Course for reviewers
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•579 views
This document outlines how to be a constructive reviewer for journal articles and conference papers. It discusses assessing papers based on criteria like title/abstract, audience, arguments, evidence, and references. Reviewers should produce a review presenting whether a paper needs minor revisions, substantial changes, or is inappropriate. The workshop aims to explore the reviewer's role through critical reading questions and a group review activity. Participants reflect on reviewing skills gained from hands-on experience and workshop targets achieved.
Report
Share
Report
Share
!['How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refereeing for journal articles and conference papers’ Susie Andretta [email_address]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/reviewcourse-110413030258-phpapp01/85/Course-for-reviewers-1-320.jpg)
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Andretta - How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refere...
Andretta - How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refere...IL Group (CILIP Information Literacy Group)
This document discusses how to be a critical but constructive reviewer for journal articles and conference papers. It explores the role of the reviewer in evaluating the quality of a paper according to criteria like the appropriateness of the title and abstract, targeted audience, quality of arguments and evidence, and referencing. The document provides guidance on producing a review for a paper and using a review form to determine whether a paper should be accepted with or without changes or is inappropriate. It also includes critical reading questions and discusses the targets and outcomes of the workshop.Thesis Writing 2013-14 Week7
The document provides tips for conducting a literature review. It advises the reviewer to ask questions to define the scope and problems of the review, evaluate how each source is relevant to the research questions, and ensure the review synthesizes sources and identifies gaps or controversies in the literature. A literature review must configure sources directly related to the research problems, result in a synthesis summary, and formulate new questions for further research.
Scientific literature & format of journal article
This document discusses the format of a scientific journal article. It begins by explaining that journal articles are considered primary literature. It then outlines the typical sections of a journal article which include: the title, authors, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, tables/figures, discussion, and references. Each section is described briefly, with the title summarizing the study, the abstract concisely outlining the rationale, results and interpretation, and the references supporting the information presented.
Tools for writing Review Article
This presentation describes important steps before starting writing any paper:
Types of Articles
Comparison of Review Article and Research Paper
Structure of Manuscript
Tools used to prepare a manuscript
Types of Review
The flow of Research Process
How to write a technical paper
This document provides guidance on how to write technical papers for journals. It discusses key aspects of research such as the difference between research and development. It also outlines important elements of a successful research paper such as having a knowledgeable guide, conducting thorough research, and publishing in a well-established journal. The document then covers various sections of a technical paper like the title, author byline, abstract, keywords, and body content. It provides best practices and common mistakes to avoid for writing each section effectively. Overall, the document serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers on structuring, formatting and strengthening their technical papers.
6. Are you ready to write your methodology?
Ready to Write Methodology: Outstanding Methodology Chapters Reviewed: Are your Ready to Write your Methodology? James & Slater (2014)
Guidelines review article
This document provides guidelines for writing a review article, including the typical elements and structure. It discusses the purpose and audience of review articles and describes the most common types. The guidelines explain each section of a review article in detail, from the title to the references. Examples of high-quality review articles are also provided from plant science journals to illustrate best practices. The 18-step process for preparing a thorough review article is outlined.
Step 6
You really want to write a review paper, yes here is all you need to start writing your introduction, next comes what you need to get your methodology ready, just keep following. we will get there together
Recommended
Andretta - How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refere...
Andretta - How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refere...IL Group (CILIP Information Literacy Group)
This document discusses how to be a critical but constructive reviewer for journal articles and conference papers. It explores the role of the reviewer in evaluating the quality of a paper according to criteria like the appropriateness of the title and abstract, targeted audience, quality of arguments and evidence, and referencing. The document provides guidance on producing a review for a paper and using a review form to determine whether a paper should be accepted with or without changes or is inappropriate. It also includes critical reading questions and discusses the targets and outcomes of the workshop.Thesis Writing 2013-14 Week7
The document provides tips for conducting a literature review. It advises the reviewer to ask questions to define the scope and problems of the review, evaluate how each source is relevant to the research questions, and ensure the review synthesizes sources and identifies gaps or controversies in the literature. A literature review must configure sources directly related to the research problems, result in a synthesis summary, and formulate new questions for further research.
Scientific literature & format of journal article
This document discusses the format of a scientific journal article. It begins by explaining that journal articles are considered primary literature. It then outlines the typical sections of a journal article which include: the title, authors, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, tables/figures, discussion, and references. Each section is described briefly, with the title summarizing the study, the abstract concisely outlining the rationale, results and interpretation, and the references supporting the information presented.
Tools for writing Review Article
This presentation describes important steps before starting writing any paper:
Types of Articles
Comparison of Review Article and Research Paper
Structure of Manuscript
Tools used to prepare a manuscript
Types of Review
The flow of Research Process
How to write a technical paper
This document provides guidance on how to write technical papers for journals. It discusses key aspects of research such as the difference between research and development. It also outlines important elements of a successful research paper such as having a knowledgeable guide, conducting thorough research, and publishing in a well-established journal. The document then covers various sections of a technical paper like the title, author byline, abstract, keywords, and body content. It provides best practices and common mistakes to avoid for writing each section effectively. Overall, the document serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers on structuring, formatting and strengthening their technical papers.
6. Are you ready to write your methodology?
Ready to Write Methodology: Outstanding Methodology Chapters Reviewed: Are your Ready to Write your Methodology? James & Slater (2014)
Guidelines review article
This document provides guidelines for writing a review article, including the typical elements and structure. It discusses the purpose and audience of review articles and describes the most common types. The guidelines explain each section of a review article in detail, from the title to the references. Examples of high-quality review articles are also provided from plant science journals to illustrate best practices. The 18-step process for preparing a thorough review article is outlined.
Step 6
You really want to write a review paper, yes here is all you need to start writing your introduction, next comes what you need to get your methodology ready, just keep following. we will get there together
Structure of a research paper
This document provides guidance on writing academic papers and evaluating journals. It discusses the different types of papers, elements to include in various sections like the abstract and introduction, how to write the literature review, and tips for organizing the paper. Key aspects covered include defining the structure of papers, evaluating journals based on indexing, impact factors and payment models, and how to write titles, introduce topics, synthesize literature, and structure paragraphs.
Why my paper got rejected
Most of us write to publish in high graded journals. But often our paper got rejected. Know the reasons and improve your paper.
Slides_on_Publishing_Simon_French
There are several reasons for publishing research, both positive and negative. Positively, publishing allows researchers to share ideas, results, and data in order to advance science and potentially change the world. However, researchers may also publish for less ideal reasons like getting a job, meeting publication quotas, or simply being told to publish. When deciding how and where to publish, researchers should consider their objectives, intended audience, career goals, and the appropriate outlet for their topic and results. They should also plan their writing process carefully and seek feedback to produce the highest quality publication. An overall publication strategy is important to balance these various factors and objectives over time.
Components of an academic paper
The document outlines the key components of an academic paper, including conducting research, including a thesis statement that states the paper's purpose, creating an outline as a roadmap, writing an introduction to tell the reader what will be discussed, using the body to tell the story, citing sources in a bibliography or works cited section, and concluding by stating what was discussed for the reader.
Guidelines for article review assignment
This document provides guidelines for writing an article review assignment. Students are asked to write a 3 to 4 page review concisely discussing the key aspects of an assigned research article and important questions it raises. The goal is to examine the article's complexities, not judge its quality. Students should refer to guidelines on evaluating articles and tips for writing a critical review. The review should follow academic writing conventions, be clear, accurate and error-free.
Orglitrev
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review, including how to organize, write, and critically analyze sources. It explains that a literature review discusses current knowledge on a topic supported by research findings, and lays the foundation for a new study. Key steps include searching literature, critically analyzing each source, organizing findings into an outline, writing the review, and summarizing to present a rationale for one's own study. The document provides guidance on critically analyzing sources and organizing findings using a tree diagram outline before writing the literature review in APA style.
Components of a review paper
The document provides guidance on how to write a review paper. It explains that a review paper synthesizes and analyzes the findings of several primary research sources to develop a coherent argument or description about a topic. The review paper should include an introduction that defines the topic, its relevance, and the thesis. The body should analyze, synthesize and interpret sources rather than just summarizing them. The conclusion should connect the main points back to the thesis and discuss the paper's significance. All sources must be accurately cited in the references section.
How to write review article
This document provides guidance on how to write a review article. It explains that a review article summarizes scholarly research on a topic and evaluates other works. Reviews organize, evaluate, and identify trends in literature, as well as research gaps. A review article follows a standard format including a title, list of authors, abstract, introduction, body, conclusion, and references. The body organizes and compares studies on the topic. Writing a review article involves narrowing the topic, researching literature, outlining the structure, drafting sections, revising, and editing.
Content (reading & writing)
The document discusses different types of academic writing such as book reviews, literature reviews, research reports, project proposals, and position papers. It provides guidance on the unique features and requirements for each type of writing. The document also covers professional correspondence such as resumes, college applications, job applications, and office correspondence.
For this discussion, provide a summary of the scholarly article
The document provides instructions for students to find a scholarly article related to their discipline and the 12 themes of qualitative inquiry using the Capella university library. It explains that students should describe the keywords used in their search, why they selected those keywords, how they found the article, and how their search methods could be improved. The document lists the 12 themes of qualitative inquiry under the categories of design strategies, data collection and observational strategies, and analysis strategies to guide the students' search.
How to write a review paper
The document provides guidelines for writing a review paper, including collecting relevant literature, consolidating findings, writing sections, formatting, and submitting the paper. Key steps include identifying keywords, conducting a citation study, compiling literature in a spreadsheet, writing sections by citing evidence, including figures/tables, summarizing each section, and getting mentor feedback before selecting a journal for submission while meeting its reference style and checking for plagiarism. The guidelines recommend a minimum of 120 referred papers cited, avoiding duplicated content, and ensuring each section helps future researchers. An example review paper is briefly described to illustrate the process.
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
ash edu 671 week 2 assignment action research project,ash edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix,ash edu 671 week 2 dq 1 the literature review debate,ash edu 671 new,edu 671 new,ash edu 671 new week 2 tutorial,edu 671 new week 2 assignment,ash edu 671 new week 2 help
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
ash edu 671 week 2 assignment action research project,ash edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix,ash edu 671 week 2 dq 1 the literature review debate,ash edu 671 new,edu 671 new,ash edu 671 new week 2 tutorial,edu 671 new week 2 assignment,ash edu 671 new week 2 help
Developing Learners’ Critical Reading Strategies in ESP Settings & Beyond
This document discusses developing critical reading strategies for language learners. It outlines 3 levels of reading comprehension (literal, interpretive, critical) and identifies reading strategies like skimming and scanning versus reading skills. Some questions are posed about differences between first and second language reading. Five steps are proposed for teaching critical literacy: familiarizing learners with strategies, selecting readings collaboratively, asking critical questions, discussing questions, and writing reflections. An activity is described using an article by Mortimer Adler on marking books to develop critical reading abilities.
ex week7
This document provides guidance on writing an effective literature review. It explains that a literature review should convey the key points of existing research precisely, critically appraise prior studies from a neutral perspective, and synthesize results into a summary of what is known and still unknown. The review should define the research question, scope, and purpose. When examining sources, the writer should evaluate the problems addressed, theoretical perspectives, logical analyses, importance to the topic, and ease of understanding. Finally, an effective literature review presents themes in sections with related theories and quotes sources in context of the research questions.
How to review a scientific journal article: Writing summaries and critiques
Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article. Both types of writing ask you first to read and understand an article from the primary literature about your topic. The summary involves briefly but accurately stating the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article. There are ten tips for reviewing scientific manuscripts and 5 red flags. The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author’s research. Summaries and critiques help you learn to synthesize information from different sources and are usually limited to two pages maximum.
How to get published in Scopus/ IEEE journals
The document provides guidance on publishing research theses in scholarly journals. It discusses reasons for disseminating research, choosing the right journal, preparing articles for submission, and the editorial review process. The key steps are evaluating a journal's reputation and scope, structuring the article appropriately, and addressing any revisions requested during peer review to improve the work for resubmission or publication in another journal if rejected. Getting published involves persistence in responding constructively to reviewer feedback.
Nzcom writing for the journal.pptx with sound
This document provides tips for writing an article for publication in the NZCOM Journal. It discusses identifying an interesting topic and perspective to write about. Authors should consider co-authoring with someone experienced like a supervisor. The writing process involves drafting, getting feedback, and revising. Key sections of an article are outlined such as the introduction, methods, findings and discussion. Formatting guidelines and the editorial review process are also summarized to help authors successfully publish their work.
Lesson
Lesson1231231 sdsad d grt tynj mjm sdfsd fsa gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdfs gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
andretta_conulfeb06
This document discusses information literacy and its role as a catalyst for educational change. It begins by defining information literacy and outlining some of its key aspects. It then examines some of the challenges of implementing information literacy in higher education, such as supporting lifelong learning skills, developing a learning culture, and addressing diverse student needs through flexible teaching approaches. The document argues that information literacy can empower both learners and librarians when implemented through a clear collaborative strategy between faculty, libraries, and administrators. When adopted as a pedagogical framework, information literacy can support lifelong learning and increase institutional and national competitiveness.
Transliteracy the latest stage of the literacy continuum.
Transliteracy is the latest stage of literacy that involves consumers of information becoming producers of information across various media. It combines traditional literacy skills with skills using new technologies like Web 2.0. Transliteracy allows information to be communicated innovatively in new forms like six word stories. Some challenges in practicing transliteracy include technological barriers, lack of staff engagement, and beliefs that social media is not appropriate for libraries.
Reviewcourse
This document outlines how to be a constructive reviewer for journal articles and conference papers. It discusses assessing papers based on criteria like title/abstract, audience, arguments, evidence, citations, and referencing. Reviewers should produce a review presenting if a paper needs no changes, minor revisions, or substantial changes. The document provides critical reading questions and discusses learning outcomes from workshops on reviewing papers.
More Related Content
What's hot
Structure of a research paper
This document provides guidance on writing academic papers and evaluating journals. It discusses the different types of papers, elements to include in various sections like the abstract and introduction, how to write the literature review, and tips for organizing the paper. Key aspects covered include defining the structure of papers, evaluating journals based on indexing, impact factors and payment models, and how to write titles, introduce topics, synthesize literature, and structure paragraphs.
Why my paper got rejected
Most of us write to publish in high graded journals. But often our paper got rejected. Know the reasons and improve your paper.
Slides_on_Publishing_Simon_French
There are several reasons for publishing research, both positive and negative. Positively, publishing allows researchers to share ideas, results, and data in order to advance science and potentially change the world. However, researchers may also publish for less ideal reasons like getting a job, meeting publication quotas, or simply being told to publish. When deciding how and where to publish, researchers should consider their objectives, intended audience, career goals, and the appropriate outlet for their topic and results. They should also plan their writing process carefully and seek feedback to produce the highest quality publication. An overall publication strategy is important to balance these various factors and objectives over time.
Components of an academic paper
The document outlines the key components of an academic paper, including conducting research, including a thesis statement that states the paper's purpose, creating an outline as a roadmap, writing an introduction to tell the reader what will be discussed, using the body to tell the story, citing sources in a bibliography or works cited section, and concluding by stating what was discussed for the reader.
Guidelines for article review assignment
This document provides guidelines for writing an article review assignment. Students are asked to write a 3 to 4 page review concisely discussing the key aspects of an assigned research article and important questions it raises. The goal is to examine the article's complexities, not judge its quality. Students should refer to guidelines on evaluating articles and tips for writing a critical review. The review should follow academic writing conventions, be clear, accurate and error-free.
Orglitrev
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review, including how to organize, write, and critically analyze sources. It explains that a literature review discusses current knowledge on a topic supported by research findings, and lays the foundation for a new study. Key steps include searching literature, critically analyzing each source, organizing findings into an outline, writing the review, and summarizing to present a rationale for one's own study. The document provides guidance on critically analyzing sources and organizing findings using a tree diagram outline before writing the literature review in APA style.
Components of a review paper
The document provides guidance on how to write a review paper. It explains that a review paper synthesizes and analyzes the findings of several primary research sources to develop a coherent argument or description about a topic. The review paper should include an introduction that defines the topic, its relevance, and the thesis. The body should analyze, synthesize and interpret sources rather than just summarizing them. The conclusion should connect the main points back to the thesis and discuss the paper's significance. All sources must be accurately cited in the references section.
How to write review article
This document provides guidance on how to write a review article. It explains that a review article summarizes scholarly research on a topic and evaluates other works. Reviews organize, evaluate, and identify trends in literature, as well as research gaps. A review article follows a standard format including a title, list of authors, abstract, introduction, body, conclusion, and references. The body organizes and compares studies on the topic. Writing a review article involves narrowing the topic, researching literature, outlining the structure, drafting sections, revising, and editing.
Content (reading & writing)
The document discusses different types of academic writing such as book reviews, literature reviews, research reports, project proposals, and position papers. It provides guidance on the unique features and requirements for each type of writing. The document also covers professional correspondence such as resumes, college applications, job applications, and office correspondence.
For this discussion, provide a summary of the scholarly article
The document provides instructions for students to find a scholarly article related to their discipline and the 12 themes of qualitative inquiry using the Capella university library. It explains that students should describe the keywords used in their search, why they selected those keywords, how they found the article, and how their search methods could be improved. The document lists the 12 themes of qualitative inquiry under the categories of design strategies, data collection and observational strategies, and analysis strategies to guide the students' search.
How to write a review paper
The document provides guidelines for writing a review paper, including collecting relevant literature, consolidating findings, writing sections, formatting, and submitting the paper. Key steps include identifying keywords, conducting a citation study, compiling literature in a spreadsheet, writing sections by citing evidence, including figures/tables, summarizing each section, and getting mentor feedback before selecting a journal for submission while meeting its reference style and checking for plagiarism. The guidelines recommend a minimum of 120 referred papers cited, avoiding duplicated content, and ensuring each section helps future researchers. An example review paper is briefly described to illustrate the process.
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
ash edu 671 week 2 assignment action research project,ash edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix,ash edu 671 week 2 dq 1 the literature review debate,ash edu 671 new,edu 671 new,ash edu 671 new week 2 tutorial,edu 671 new week 2 assignment,ash edu 671 new week 2 help
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
ash edu 671 week 2 assignment action research project,ash edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix,ash edu 671 week 2 dq 1 the literature review debate,ash edu 671 new,edu 671 new,ash edu 671 new week 2 tutorial,edu 671 new week 2 assignment,ash edu 671 new week 2 help
Developing Learners’ Critical Reading Strategies in ESP Settings & Beyond
This document discusses developing critical reading strategies for language learners. It outlines 3 levels of reading comprehension (literal, interpretive, critical) and identifies reading strategies like skimming and scanning versus reading skills. Some questions are posed about differences between first and second language reading. Five steps are proposed for teaching critical literacy: familiarizing learners with strategies, selecting readings collaboratively, asking critical questions, discussing questions, and writing reflections. An activity is described using an article by Mortimer Adler on marking books to develop critical reading abilities.
ex week7
This document provides guidance on writing an effective literature review. It explains that a literature review should convey the key points of existing research precisely, critically appraise prior studies from a neutral perspective, and synthesize results into a summary of what is known and still unknown. The review should define the research question, scope, and purpose. When examining sources, the writer should evaluate the problems addressed, theoretical perspectives, logical analyses, importance to the topic, and ease of understanding. Finally, an effective literature review presents themes in sections with related theories and quotes sources in context of the research questions.
How to review a scientific journal article: Writing summaries and critiques
Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article. Both types of writing ask you first to read and understand an article from the primary literature about your topic. The summary involves briefly but accurately stating the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article. There are ten tips for reviewing scientific manuscripts and 5 red flags. The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author’s research. Summaries and critiques help you learn to synthesize information from different sources and are usually limited to two pages maximum.
How to get published in Scopus/ IEEE journals
The document provides guidance on publishing research theses in scholarly journals. It discusses reasons for disseminating research, choosing the right journal, preparing articles for submission, and the editorial review process. The key steps are evaluating a journal's reputation and scope, structuring the article appropriately, and addressing any revisions requested during peer review to improve the work for resubmission or publication in another journal if rejected. Getting published involves persistence in responding constructively to reviewer feedback.
Nzcom writing for the journal.pptx with sound
This document provides tips for writing an article for publication in the NZCOM Journal. It discusses identifying an interesting topic and perspective to write about. Authors should consider co-authoring with someone experienced like a supervisor. The writing process involves drafting, getting feedback, and revising. Key sections of an article are outlined such as the introduction, methods, findings and discussion. Formatting guidelines and the editorial review process are also summarized to help authors successfully publish their work.
Lesson
Lesson1231231 sdsad d grt tynj mjm sdfsd fsa gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdf gdfs gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
What's hot (19)
For this discussion, provide a summary of the scholarly article
For this discussion, provide a summary of the scholarly article
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
Uop edu 671 week 2 assignment literature review matrix uop
Developing Learners’ Critical Reading Strategies in ESP Settings & Beyond
Developing Learners’ Critical Reading Strategies in ESP Settings & Beyond
How to review a scientific journal article: Writing summaries and critiques
How to review a scientific journal article: Writing summaries and critiques
Viewers also liked
andretta_conulfeb06
This document discusses information literacy and its role as a catalyst for educational change. It begins by defining information literacy and outlining some of its key aspects. It then examines some of the challenges of implementing information literacy in higher education, such as supporting lifelong learning skills, developing a learning culture, and addressing diverse student needs through flexible teaching approaches. The document argues that information literacy can empower both learners and librarians when implemented through a clear collaborative strategy between faculty, libraries, and administrators. When adopted as a pedagogical framework, information literacy can support lifelong learning and increase institutional and national competitiveness.
Transliteracy the latest stage of the literacy continuum.
Transliteracy is the latest stage of literacy that involves consumers of information becoming producers of information across various media. It combines traditional literacy skills with skills using new technologies like Web 2.0. Transliteracy allows information to be communicated innovatively in new forms like six word stories. Some challenges in practicing transliteracy include technological barriers, lack of staff engagement, and beliefs that social media is not appropriate for libraries.
Reviewcourse
This document outlines how to be a constructive reviewer for journal articles and conference papers. It discusses assessing papers based on criteria like title/abstract, audience, arguments, evidence, citations, and referencing. Reviewers should produce a review presenting if a paper needs no changes, minor revisions, or substantial changes. The document provides critical reading questions and discusses learning outcomes from workshops on reviewing papers.
Quantitativeanalysis
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Transliteracy: take a walk on the wild side
Keynote presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage", 23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy.
Seraphim11april
Social media platforms are changing how people access and share information, requiring information literacy skills to adapt. A seminar discussed how the rise of social media necessitates rethinking how information literacy is conceptualized and taught. The seminar explored social media's impact on information behaviors and what new literacy skills are needed to evaluate and engage with information online.
25barrierstoweb2implimentation 101129161749-phpapp02
The document lists 25 perceived barriers to implementing Web 2.0 technologies in organizations. It argues that these barriers often stem from unfounded fears and a reluctance to change. It encourages readers to change their mindset from asking "who will let me?" to "who will stop me?" when considering using new technologies.
andretta_lilac05
Empowering the learner "against all odds" Paper presented at LILAC 2005: Librarians' Information Literacy Annual Conference. April 4-6 2005, Imperial College, London.
Belfast04
Information literacy: developing the reflective practitioner
Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, August 31 - September 2 2004, Belfast, Ireland.
Viewers also liked (9)
Transliteracy the latest stage of the literacy continuum.
Transliteracy the latest stage of the literacy continuum.
25barrierstoweb2implimentation 101129161749-phpapp02
25barrierstoweb2implimentation 101129161749-phpapp02
Similar to Course for reviewers
Reviewing a journal article - Professor Jenny Rowley
Reviewing a journal article - Professor Jenny RowleyPostgraduate Arts & Humanities Centre (PAHC), Manchester Metropolitan University
This document provides guidance for research students on peer reviewing for academic journals. It discusses the purpose and process of peer review, how to prepare for and conduct reviews, and key aspects to consider when writing a review. The peer review process involves submitting articles to journals to be evaluated by independent experts. Reviewers provide feedback to authors to improve their work and inform the editor's publication decision. The document reviews what peer review entails, its benefits for students, factors to consider before accepting a review invitation, typical review stages and formats, elements to address in a review, and how to evaluate example reviews. The overall aim is to encourage and support students' involvement in peer reviewing.Literature Review- Dr Ryan Thomas Williams
A review of the previous experiments and investigations done within our chosen topic area.
Shows how your chosen topic fits with the research that has gone before and puts this into context.
‘A researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field’ (Boote and Beile, 2005: 3)
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx
1
Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing.
The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar.
The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles.
Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article.
Link to peer reviewed article one:
http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341
1) APA reference for article #1
2)Introductionand core study elements
· Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed.
· Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)?
· What were the research questions?
· What were the key findings and conclusions of the study?
3) Evaluate literature reviewed
· Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing?
4) Evaluate theoretical framework
· What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study?
5) Evaluate methods
· What research method and designs are used in this study?
· How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)?
· Do the m ...
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
This document provides guidance for students on completing their critical review and professional artefact assignments for the BA (Hons) programme. It discusses the structure and content required for the critical review, including an introduction, evaluation of the inquiry process, analysis of findings, and critical reflection. It also provides examples of how to analyze different types of data collected, such as observations, surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Finally, it addresses formatting requirements, use of citations and references, and responding to common student questions about distinguishing the critical review from the professional artefact.
How to write a research paper?
These slides are related to our last event at the Sapienza University of Rome for the graduate students. Please follow our website: https://www.facebook.com/psa.sapienza
The Peer Review Process
The document outlines the academic peer review process. It involves submitting a paper to a conference, which is then assigned to an area chair and sent to reviewers. The reviewers create scores and feedback, which are used by the area chair to write a summary and determine if the paper is accepted or rejected. The process relies on expert reviewers to evaluate the validity and significance of contributions. The document also provides guidance on conducting a detailed peer review, including performing multiple reads of the paper, checking for flaws, structuring a review report, and focusing on strengths as well as areas for improvement.
literaturereview-skills-PowerPoint.pptx
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review for an undergraduate dissertation. It discusses what a literature review is and its purpose, the structure of a literature review, critical reading, synthesizing information from sources, and concluding the literature review. Key points covered include demonstrating an in-depth understanding of the topic area, identifying major thinkers and research gaps, and convincing the reader that the research questions are important and the thesis will make an original contribution.
Writing-a-Journal-Article-Review-1i.pptx
The document provides guidance for writing a journal article review. It begins by defining what a journal article is and explains that a review asks the reader to evaluate an article beyond just summarizing it. The document then lists detailed questions to guide the evaluation of an article's purpose and argument, organization of information, methods, and data. It provides an example of a sample journal article review, which includes an annotated bibliography, summary, and actual review. Finally, it provides instructions for a student's first quarter exam, which involves choosing a journal article to review based on their research group's approved topic.
What it needs to Write a Review Paper
This presentation gives an insight of what is a review paper,
Purpose & Objective, functions of Review Articles, Difference between Research and Review Articles, Types of Review Articles
Key points to write Review Article, Writing a Scientific Literature Review, Parts of review paper, elements of a review paper, how to write different sections of a review article
MSc thesis_structure and content.2020.pptx
This document provides guidance on writing an MSc thesis. It discusses that good research and writing are both important, with good research being more essential. It outlines the typical structure of an MSc thesis, including chapters for the introduction, literature review, methods, findings, discussion, and conclusion. It emphasizes that the thesis should demonstrate rigorous research methods and analysis. The document also discusses assessing reliability and validity, presenting findings through tables and graphs, and referencing sources using an author-year system.
如何撰寫並投稿專業論文至SCI/SSCI期刊-三星統計陳建宏顧問-20130717
This document provides information about a workshop on publishing for success offered by Dr. Charlie C. Chen. The workshop aims to help participants improve their academic writing skills and ability to publish papers. Dr. Chen is a tenured professor who has authored multiple books and papers.
The workshop covers key elements of academic publications like abstracts, introductions, literature reviews, and conclusions. It teaches writing strategies for each element and has participants apply the strategies to improve their own works-in-progress. Participants will also provide peer reviews and receive feedback to further strengthen their papers. The goal is for attendees to gain confidence in their writing and publishing abilities.
Critical analysis with exercise.compressed
What is behind critical analysis -that elusive task that all supervisors ask for. How to prepare for performing it. Exercise to practice.
10.11.11 review of analysis and learning 3760
This document provides guidance for students completing a critical review assignment. It outlines the structure and content required, including an introduction, evaluation of the inquiry process, analysis of findings, and critical reflection. Students are advised to consider their research questions, data collection tools, literature review, findings, and implications for practice. The document also addresses formatting requirements, citing sources, managing data, and relating the critical review to a accompanying professional artifact.
Mba dissertation
This document provides guidance on structuring an MBA dissertation. It discusses the overall framework, which includes sections like the introduction, literature review, methodology, data presentation and analysis, discussion, and conclusions. The dissertation should be 20,000-25,000 words not including references or appendices. Plagiarism is unacceptable. Students should begin work early and meet regularly with their supervisor. The research proposal should define the research question and objectives, and describe the methodology and analysis. Specific aspects like the abstract, literature review, and data presentation/analysis are also addressed.
Assignment Writing
This document provides guidance on writing an academic assignment. It outlines the typical structure, which includes sections like the title page, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, findings and conclusions. Key elements of each section are defined. The importance of critical analysis and synthesis is emphasized. Tips are provided on topics selection, reading literature, using sources, being critical, structure, writing style, and meeting assignment requirements. Analysis involves breaking down concepts while synthesis combines elements to form a coherent whole.
seminar.pdf
HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT ENGINERING EXAM AND ANSWER-2
Salon 2 14 kasim 11.00 12.00 john albarran
1) The document provides a step-by-step strategy for getting published in a peer-reviewed journal, beginning with identifying a novel topic and choosing the right journal, and including developing a writing plan, ensuring originality, conducting quality assurance reviews, and properly submitting the paper.
2) Key steps include identifying a topic you are passionate about, researching what has already been published on the topic, choosing the right journal based on its aims and scope, developing a writing plan with targets and regular writing sessions, getting feedback from others, and carefully following the journal's author guidelines when submitting.
3) Common mistakes include presenting too much background, overstating problems or solutions, including too many ideas in one paper, and
How to write a great research paper
This document provides guidance on writing a research paper, outlining its typical structure and key elements. It discusses the importance of writing a research paper, as well as the standard sections - introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. It also covers best practices for titles, keywords, citations, and avoiding plagiarism. The document aims to help students and researchers improve their written reports and research papers.
So you want to write a technical paper!
This presentation takes you through the 6 KEY STEPS to writing a technical or white paper to accelerate your career and become known as an expert in your organization.
WriteTEL: Session2
This document provides an overview of a workshop on planning academic papers. It discusses developing an outline for a paper, including typical sections like introduction, background, methodology, results, discussion and conclusions. Last sessions covered types of publications and what makes a good paper. This session will focus on paper structure and developing an outline, with tips like choosing a paper type, finding an example paper, and starting with a generic structure to customize. The goal is for participants to understand common paper elements and be able to start developing their own outline by the end of the workshop.
Similar to Course for reviewers (20)
Reviewing a journal article - Professor Jenny Rowley
Reviewing a journal article - Professor Jenny Rowley
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
Recently uploaded
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Recently uploaded (20)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Course for reviewers
- 1. 'How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refereeing for journal articles and conference papers’ Susie Andretta [email_address]
- 5. Critical reading questions What is the author’s purpose? What key questions or problems does the author raise? What information, data, and evidence does the author present? What key concepts guide the author’s reasoning? What key conclusions is the author coming to? Are those conclusions justified? What are the author’s primary assumptions? What is the author’s viewpoint? What are the implications of the author’s reasoning?
- 6. Group work: review the paper and present your feedback to the group What did you find easy/difficult about the review? Hands-on experience of reviewing a paper and reflection of the reviews produced
- 7. Plenary What can you do now that you could not do before the workshop? Can you identify at least one target/outcome as a result of this workshop?