2. Social and cultural awareness
Writing about a group that the consumer donât have first hand experiences of is something that is commonly done
in journalism. Even though you would think this would be an uninteresting news story, media producers will be
trying to communicate their ideologies on certain groups that may become a big issue in the UK and therefore, it
will be in the public interest. In this scenario, these journalists must ensure that they arenât creating an untrue or
biased account of this group.
In news reporting, there has been many examples of where groups havenât been portrayed in the best light and
therefore this group have been misrepresented to the consumer of that particular media product. Some examples
include:
Asylum Seekers
As you can see from the image on the top right, The Daily Telegraph have misrepresented Asylum Seekers in a bad
light and therefore hasnât thought about social and cultural awareness when producing this story. This particular
news producer has published other stories on the matter and each time they have misrepresented the asylum
seekers. Even though this group might have a bad name amongst some British people, when reporting the news,
which should be in a factual manner, you canât bring personal ideologies into the story. On the other hand, some
media producers look at it the other way and show how asylum seekers can be positive in terms of economy and
financial stability of the country. This is all well and good if itâs factual and hasnât been take out of context.
Therefore, the right thing to do when trying to represent a group is what the Daily Express have done on this
occasion (bottom right) they have reported what is happening in terms of asylum seekers and is communicating the
situation in a factual manner.
Benefit claimers
Even though The Daily Express got it right in the last section, on this occasion, they have fallen short of representing
benefit claimers in a balanced and fair nature. This article by the media producer features no facts to back up their
claims and no expert opinions communicating some form of statistic to the consumer to try and make this headline
that The Daily Express have gone with more credible. Instead, the news report has jumped to conclusions and
reported the negative side to the story. Even though migrant benefits have been banned, they fail to mention that
some migrants can still claim benefits and some migrants actually earn an honest wage in some of the most highly
regarded sectors. Therefore, without any of these features, The Daily Express disregards any social and cultural
awareness in this article.
3. NUJ Codes of practice
If journalists are unsure if they have shown disregard for social and cultural awareness while writing a news article,
they can check the NUJ codes of practice. These are a set of rules that journalists choose to follow if they are in this
particular union. However, the problem is that journalists doesnât have to opt into this union and can therefore
choose not to follow the codes and fall short of the ethical codes that journalists should follow, which sometimes
includes the legal codes also. The codes are as follows:
⢠âAt all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right
of the public to be informedâ â This means that a news story that is controversial has to be reported because itâs in
the public interest to do so, which means, the public needs to know. However, on very controversial stories,
journalists may have to break some later codes to get the story published. For example, media producers like The
Times, found it necessary to publish the story on tax avoiders, due to them believing that the general public should
be informed on the matter. This resulted in an angry, and most say rightful, backlash on the tax avoiders, due to the
working and middle class having to pay more in tax to make up for those that arenât.
⢠âStrives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fairâ â News stories canât be
made up or the information canât be taken out of context, it must be presented through facts and how it would be
seen if the consumers were actually there at the time. An example of this would be the story on the right hand side,
second from the top. This story communicated to the consumer that fans in the Hillsborough disaster picked the
pockets of the victims and were beating up police officers that were helping the victims. These allegations by The
Sun were later found to be false and dishonest. This story gave a bad name to the fans of both teams of the
Hillsborough disaster, as well as breaking this and a few other NUJ codes in the process.
⢠âDoes her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuraciesâ â This involves journalists correcting information that they
see or know to be false. This can be the editor of a newspaper/magazine that corrects a copy writers inaccuracies or
this can be a newspaper correcting facts and reporting the truth, even if they have received the distorted
information from another media outlet. Newspapers have to sell and be striking to the audience, they need stories
that are interesting. However, these stories must be obtained legally and ethically and must stick to the other NUJ
codes. On The Sun website, the media producer did correct the harmful inaccuracy that they had made by publishing
that story and apologised and put the record straight. However, this was too late, the damage to the fans and the
credibility of the newspaper was already done. On one hand, they broke this code because they failed to amend the
information before publishing the story, while they did correct it second time round, meaning they still broke the
code but tried to make up for it (Baring in mind, it wasnât of their own accord, it was done because they were pulled
up about it from consumers and official publishing bodies)
4. NUJ Codes of practice
⢠âDifferentiates between fact and opinionâ â This falls under the same bracket as biased information, which I covered in
Task 2. Journalists, according to the NUJ, are meant to report stories in a factual and unbiased manner and must not put
their own opinions in this piece of news reporting, which involves the journalist deciding whether a certain piece of
information they have received or collected falls in the fact or opinion category. The Daily Mail have broken this NUJ
code by been unable to differentiate between fact and opinion on this article (top right). From the headline of âThe Mail
accuses these men ok killing. If we are wrong, let them sue usâ you can tell that the producer of this article has already
started opinionated and biased from the outset. As the article continues, the sheer biased nature also continues, with
the Mail accusing these five men of been murderers without any proven information, which isnât then factual, or any
official quotes from people such as the police. Incapability to tell the difference between fact and opinion in news
reporting could lead to what the Mail expressed in the headline, a lawsuit.
⢠âObtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both
overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward meansâ â
This means that information generated by the journalist must fit an ethical and legal specification and the information
hasnât been found by illegitimate means. As the quote states, there ere some exceptions, which only apply f itâs very key
for the public to know about the story and if so, this information can be obtained through any means possible (this is
only in very extraordinary circumstances and it doesnât happen often). The most notable breach of this NUJ code is the
phone hacking of the news of the world journalists, which then led to the Levesson inquiry to be set up. The code states
that information must be obtained using open and straightforward means, unless itâs overwhelmingly in the publics
interest. The hacking of high profile celebrities and dead schoolgirl, Millie Dowlerâs phones was not an open means of
generating information and it wasnât crucial for the public to know about it. Therefore, the news of the world journalists
(Clive Goodman, Glenn Mulcaire, Andrew Coulson and Rebecca Brooks) had broken this NUJ by hacking phones for the
media producer.
⢠âDoes nothing to intrude into anybodyâs private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the
public interestâ â This is linked to the previous NUJ code and states that journalists should not intrude on peopleâs lives,
especially when they are in grief or distress. Like most NUJ codes, people think the line of intrusion is different and due
to the fact there isnât a regulatory body on these NUJ codes, the media producer canât be adjudged to have gone too far.
Some news outlets do step the wrong side of the line on occasion. A high profile case of this would be the Madeleine
McCann abduction news story. While it was reported factually at the time of the event and most newspapers managed
to follow the NUJ codes at the time of the abduction, since then, media producers have pestered and intruded on the
lives of Madeleine's parents, Kate and Gerry McCann. This involved going round to the house, trying to generate
information while they were mourning the death of their daughter and multiple other forms of intrusion.
5. NUJ Codes of practice
⢠âProtects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his workâ
â Many newspapers choose to collect sources from people to back up and give their stories more content, while the consumer
may trust the story if they have information provided from someone in the know, whether this is an expert or a trusted
person. This also involves the newspapers giving those sources that wish to remain anonymous, anonymity. If they fail to do
so, their credibility as well as the person who has leaked the information to the media outlet will be challenged. Edward
Snowden, the man who leaked many US government and world secrets, had anonymity from the newspapers (The Guardian
in particular) when he first started to leak this information. When he first started to rendezvous with Guardian Journalist
Glenn Greenwald in 2012, The Guardian kept Snowden secret and only published the information that the American was
providing to the media producer. The newspaper headline on the top right proves that The Guardian were profiting on
information from Snowden at that time and producing various articles about world secrets before other news reporters from
newspapers like The Times and Telegraph, knew about them. Of course, Edward Snowden was eventually unmasked but this
had nothing to do with The Guardian outing him, he was eventually unmasked by the NSA, by which time Snowdenâs period of
anonymity was over. For all that time, Glenn Greenwald and The Guardian had kept the secret, they had upheld this particular
NUJ code.
⢠Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal
advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledgeâ â This means
that journalist should not take or give bribes in the form of money or threatening abuse to generate information for their
news stories. This, of course, would give them an advantage when collecting information and is one of the most serious NUJ
codes of them all. Continuing on from the news of the world hacking scandal, Journalists from this this particular news outlet
bribed senior officials and high up police chiefs to gain information for their stories. It was reported by The Guardian that
News Of The World journalists were paying these sources ÂŁ100,000 to give them official and classified information. This
worked and the media producer published a few stories with this bribed information, before the corporation were found
guilty at the hacking scandal (formally The Levesson Inquiry) and eventually was shut down in 2011, with a few of the
journalists in question going to jail for this offence.
⢠âProduces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a personâs age, gender, race, colour,
creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientationâ â While I covered this NUJ code in the social and cultural
awareness section, the code goes into more detail and documents every group that you canât show discrimination or
prejudice against and what kind of hatred is not tolerated in news reporting. Even though journalists should be clear on
discrimination already, this NUJ jut reiterates what isnât tolerated when reporting the news. Newspapers like this headline by
The Daily Express are exactly what this NUJ code is there to prevent. A racist and discriminatory statement about the beliefs
and dress of other religions and faiths is the main theme of this article and falls short of this NUJ code. This isnât the first time
this media producer has fallen short of the codes, a few weeks before this article, they produced a similar story that had the
headline âBan Itâ on. Aside from the NUJ codes, this newspaper can be seen to break the legal and ethical requirements we
expect from a media outlet in the UK.
6. NUJ Codes of practice
⢠âDoes not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for
the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employedâ â This means that journalists canât
actively endorse products or companies in their articles or any other form of media. In print media, this mistake is rarely
made when mentioning a particular company but if a media producer does, they take the same approach as the BBC; they
normally state âother brands/products are availableâ and this will cover them legally as a media outlet.
⢠âA journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a
story about her/his welfareâ â With celebrity culture such a huge part of news reporting these days, so too is celebrities
children. However, there are codes protecting the children of those celebrities, which involves consent been given to the
journalist by the celebrities, or if they are members of he public, parents. If this consent is not achieved, the adults can sue
the newspaper for publishing content without consent. Many celebrities have had their children pictured over time, some
have been done wit consent, while some have not. None other than Halle Berry had images of her daughter published in US
and UK publications without giving consent to those paparazzi, which led her to join the anti-paparazzi debate, which was
reported by The Guardian earlier this year (middle right)
⢠âAvoids plagiarismâ â You would think this NUJ code would be always avoided by journalists. Copying someone elseâs work
is the direct definition of plagiarism and in news reporting, copying the work and then not crediting the original owner is
also considered plagiarism too. Johann Hari, a journalist for The Independent, was caught up in a plagiarism storm when it
was pointed out by Private Eye in 2003 and again by Yahoo Ireland editor Brain Whelan in 2011 that his interviews were
similar to others that had been published by other journalists that had interviewed the same subject. What followed was an
investigation into Hari by The Independent and then Hariâs decision to leave the media producer in 2012.
Conscience clause
This new clause that was established a little after the Levesson Inquiry and states that journalists donât have to produce
work that their editor or other members of seniority are asking them to produce because it breaches on of the twelve NUJ
codes. In addition, the NUJ website (https://www.nuj.org.uk/about/nuj-code/) states that: âThe NUJ believes a journalist
has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the
NUJ code of practiceâ before going on to say âThe NUJ will support journalists who act according to the codeâ which means
that the NUJ will support journalists if they are punished for refusing a particular task they feel breaks the rules of the NUJ.
This is one advantage of been in the National Union Of Journalists. Like I mentioned earlier, you donât have to be in the NUJ
but if you arenât, scenarios where you feel youâve been unfairly treated will have to be handled by yourself and not the
union.
7. Connotation
Journalists have an important job in terms of conveying the news to the public; their words can shape our views on a certain
topic, group or person, itâs important they use the right words when reporting the news. If they select the wrong words, the
connotations of that word may misrepresent or lead to discrimination and hate toward that certain group. A connotation is
the feeling that a word or phrase creates as well as the denotation (the literal meaning of the word).
Connation in an every day sense is that the colour red may connote anger and rage, while black may connote sadness and
sorrow. While these connotation can be transferred to a media sense, there are stronger connotations in news stories than
colours. After all, the overall view of a group is in the balance when a media outlet is reporting on them.
The newspaper example by The Daily Mail on the top right uses the word âAsylumâ in the headline, this connotes that the
people who have immigrated here are here wrongly and should be sent back to their native country. Even though this whole
headlines should possibly be changed, the word asylum could have been substituted for a word such as immigrants. This
article may have prompted the viewer ship of The Daily Mail to have a negative view on immigrants and their impact on the
British economy.
Another example I have found of a newspaper article that connotes a negative view against a particular group of people.
This time, people who claim benefits are the target of this article. However, instead of using the phrase âpeople on benefitsâ
or âbenefit claimersâ The Daily Express have used the word âscroungersâ. This connotes the feeling that these people are
wrongfully claiming from the government and donât deserve these benefits, while they are doing all the rest of the general
public a disservice by claiming these benefits, despite some people needing these said benefits to survive in this country, a
view that the media outlet hasn't thought about when producing this article.
The thing with connotation is that people interpret words in a different way to others. For example, some may see the
article on the bottom right and identify with the word âhomoâ, however, most of us would see this terms as derogatory and
discriminatory towards gay people. This 2007 newspaper article by The Sunday Paper uses the word which was extensively
complained about. Like the last example, this whole headline is wrong but because the particular word the media producer
has used has negative ties towards it and when teamed with the word in the headline, it makes it seem like itâs a problem in
society, when in actuality, this is a problem that a small minority in society has. A word such as âgayâ would have been less
offensive to the particular group and would have avoided much, but not all, of the discriminatory nature.
If news producers are unclear on the rules when news reporting, they can read the NUJ codes or consult the NUJ
themselves, through the phone line that the union have set up for journalists. If they have any queries on which words will
cause least offence and not be challenged legally, journalists will consult the materials available.
8. Alternative readings
Most media outlets have a target audience they have established through viewership statistics, but they must also account
for alternate viewers consuming their work also. While they donât have to make their products accessible for other
demographics, they have to be open minded and not discriminatory against certain groups of people. Before publishing
their work, journalists have to think about the possibility of other groups reading their works and if the article is biased
toward a certain group or will hatred be generated toward a certain group if they publish it. Cultural theorist Stuart Hall
explored the use of alternative reading and reception theory and came up with the encoding and decoding model, which
helps to explain how a consumer decodes messages and connotations within media and other walks of life.
For example, different people may have a different view on an article, compared to another person from a different group.
A British male may not have the same reading as an African American male, while this is true for all different groups. It of
course depends on the certain persons experiences of life and what they have one through before they resd the article in
question, have they been a victim of a crime, gone through poverty or war or have they gone through mass tragedy, can
they link themselves to the article and understand what a certain person or group is going through because they have been
through the same ordeal, and some may not, some may not fully understand the extent and severity of certain subjects if
they have not been there themselves.
Newspapers will often report on the same story from a different viewpoint each time, this is to please all groups, however, I
would be much more simpler to generate a balanced argument that pleases all groups of people. As well as this, before all
the versions have been generated, there is always a particular group that will be discriminated against in the article, unless
they over all viewpoints in the same publication but on separate pages.
The information in the article in the top right is biased against mental patients and therefore an alternative reading can be
taken from it. They state that 1,200 people are killed by mental patients each year but they donât state a balanced argument
or even an element of stating some form of sympathising element with the mental patients, instead, deciding to create this
hatred towards them, which may become part of the newspaper readers ideologies. If you put the encoding and decoding
model in place on this article, it doesnât take long to decode the negative messages from the headline alone, you can tell it
will be a negative story towards the mental patients, while the media producer hasnât even taken into consideration people
who have been or are going through mental illness reading this article.
As for the other article, it shows a disregard for anyone who is in the group that have been victim of this article. The Daily
Express state that if youâre an asylum seeker and gay, you will automatically be given preferential treatment. This leaves no
interpretation for readers in the affected groups and is generating hatred towards them. If the story showed some form of
proof with official statistics and toned down the headline, while reporting in a factual manner, this news story would be
following the NUJ codes and would be open to an alternative reading from certain group.