Competing Values Framework
Case Study – PT Apexindo Pratama Duta
Presented by
Aditya Narendra Maharsi
Angie Pritta Caroline
Ahmad Ardiansyah Zein
Bambang Wijarnako
Pranoto Satrio Wicaksono
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
The Content
Company Profile
Theoretical Background
Performances
Competing Values Analysis
Conclusion & Recommended Strategies
Company Profile
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Company Profile
Founder
Hertriono Kartowisastro
Vision
A world-class drilling contractor offering
quality without compromise
Mission
• Maintaining a high standard of Safety, Health, and
Environment (SHE) to ensure the safety an welfare of
employees and to protect the surrounding environment.
• Providing maximum value to all of stakeholders and
making a positive impact to the society and the
environment.
• Developing human resources with global-standard
quality and competency.
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Company Profile : Milestone
1984
Established as an Indonesian
offshore Drilling contractor
1992
First submersible
swampbarge rig, Maera
2005
ISO 9001 :2000 Certification in
Quality Management System
2007
Super premium Jack up rig,
Soehanah
2008
Upgrade the ISO 9001 :2008
version
2009
The Safety Campaign
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Company Profile : Milestone
2000
Expand operation to Middle
East
2001
Merged with PT Medco
Antareja
2002
IPO : 10 July 2002
2012
PT Apexindo Energi Investama
become the new majority
shareholder of the Company
2009
Settled IDR Bonds Apexindo
Pratama Duta
2011
Certification of ISO
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Company Profile : Operation
Onshore
Offshore
FPSO (Floating Production,
Storage, and Offloading)
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Company Profile
Theoretical Background
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
COMPETING VALUE
Kerangka budaya organisasi yang dikembangkan oleh
Cameron dan Quinn (1999) berdasarkan model teoritis
disebut “Competing Values Framework” atau “Kerangka
Nilai Bersaing“.
Parameter atau Variabel yang dianalisa :
• Concern for Task vs. Concern for People
• Stability and Efficiency vs. Flexibility and Innovation
• Internal vs external focus.
• Long Term vs Short Term.
• etc
Theoretical Background
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Theoretical Background
CREATE
COMPETECONTROL
COLLABORATE
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Theoretical Background
Kuadran Ukuran Kuadran Pendekatan finansial yang digunakan
Control Quality Gross margin
Efficiency Asset turnover
Compete Profit EVA
Speed Change in EVA growth
Create Growth Sales growth
Innovation Standard deviations of market model errors
Collaborate Knowledge Future growth values
Community Sales/number of employees
CREATING CVF FROM FINANCIAL EMPIRICAL DATA
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Differentiation
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Cost Leadership
Type of Organization
Theoretical Background
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Fit
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Stretch
Type of Organization
Theoretical Background
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Best Cost
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Best Cost – Blue Ocean
Type of Organization
Theoretical Background
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
COMPETING VALUE INDUSTRY VS
COMPANY (example)
Theoretical Background
Performances
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Performances
No Type of Listing Listed Shares Listed Date
1 IPO (First Issue) @ Rp550,- 200,000,000 10-Jul-02
2 Company Listing 1,545,000,000 10-Jul-02
3 Rights Issue I 25:12 @Rp550 837,600,000 26-Sep-05
4 ESOP Converted (2005 to 2008) 77,250,000
5 Delisting -2,659,850,000 27-Apr-09
6 Relisting @ Rp1,562,- 2.659.850.000 05-Jun-20013
Listing History
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Performances
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Stock Price Movement (1st Month)
Offering Price at relisting (IPO) Rp. 1.562 (5 June 2013)
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Performances
Financial Statement
2013 2012 ∆
Current Assets 152,051,043 465,143,375 -67%
Non Current Assets 638,859,911 246,580,991 159%
Liabilities And Equity 119,109,331 79,115,039 51%
Non Current
Liabilities 389,280,099 399,189,027 -2%
Equity 282,521,524 233,420,300 21%
Revenue 259,595,002 208,757,661 24%
Direct Costs 161,331,971 136,394,546 18%
Gross Profit 98,263,031 72,363,115 36%
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Performances
Financial Statement
2013 2012 ∆
Income Before Tax
Expense 68,855,235 35,449,657 94%
Income Tax Expense - Net (19,616,096) (12,357,313)
Net Income for the year 49,239,139 23,092,344 113%
Other Comprehensive
Income (137,915) (45,462)
Total Comprehensive
Income 49,101,224 23,046,882
Net income for the year 49,239,139 23,092,344
Total comprehensive
income 49,101,224 23,046,882
Basic Earning Per Share 0.0185 0.0087 113%
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Performances
3865
4946.09
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14
APEX
IHSG
Stock Price Comparison
Competing Values Analysis
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Competing Values Analysis
Financial data PT Apexindo Pratama Duta for creating CVF
Quadrant
Measures for
quadrant
Proxies used
Company Sector
Actual Adjusted Actual Adjusted
Create
Growth Sales growth 0.97 0.97 11.4 11.4
Innovation Standard deviation of market model errors 0 0.12 0.95 0.95
Compete
Profit EVA (Economic Value Added)/ROA 6.55 6.55 7.23 7.23
Speed Change in EVA grwoth/ROA Avg 0 6.55 12.14 12.14
Control
Quality Gross margin 37.85 37.85 26.79 26.79
Efficiency Asset turnover 0.35 0.35 0.81 0.81
Collaborate
Knowledge Future growth values/capital spending 35.38 35.38 8.47 8.47
Community Sales/number of employess 6897311232 689.7311232 3334958240 333.495824
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Competing Values Analysis
Industry vs competing value company
PT Apexindo Pratama Duta
Type of organization
0.1
1
10
100
1000
I
Innovation
Growth
II
Speed
Profit
III
Efficiency
Quality
IV
Community
Knowledge
Company
Sector
Innovation
Growth
Speed
Profits
Efficiency
Quality
Community
Developement
Best Cost
Conclusion & Recommended Strategies
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Conclusion
• APEX could be categorized as the company with Compete and
Collaborate culture.
• In term of Quality, Community and Knowledge, APEX’s scores are
higher than average sector’s scores.
• In term of Innovation, Growth, speed and Efficiency, APEX’s
scores are far lower than average sector’s scores.
• APEX should have strategies to escalate the Growth, Speed and
efficiency score at least close to the average sector’s scores.
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Recommended Strategies
• Increasing the ROA
• Escalating the satisfaction of the existing clients and increasing the
company performance to attract potential clients and investors.
• Escalating QHSE Performance
• Developing cost reduction (Cost Efficiency) Program
• Developing Training and Development Program to increase the
competency of the employee in order to support Cost Efficiency
program and increasing the productivity.
• Utilizing available IT system to support Cost Efficiency Program and
Increasing the productivity.
• Re-structuring the existing organization to achieve the efficient and
Effective organization.
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Strategic Mapping
Financial PerspectiveCustomer Perspective
Internal
Business
Process
Perspective
Learning and
Growth
Perspective
ROA
Satisfaction
Trust
Safety
Perfor.
Cost Efficiency
Productivity
Competency Restructuring IT System
Competing Values Analysis - APEX
Balance Score Card
Perspective Objective Measures Target
Financial Escalating the ROA The growth of ROA 10 %
Customer
Increasing the satisfaction of
the existing clients
Client’s complain 0
Complain
Escalating the trust of
potential clients
New Project 1/year
Internal Business
Process
Escalating the safety
performance
FATALITY 0
Property Damage 50 %
Cost Efficiency Total Asset Turnover 10 %
Increasing Productivity Total
Revenue/Employee
20 %
Learning and
Growth
Training and Development
Program
hour of employee
Trained per year
16 h
Using available IT Technology Business Intelligent 100 %
Rel.
Re-structuring No of Position 10 %
Conclusion & Recommended Strategies
Thank You

Competing Value Framework

  • 1.
    Competing Values Framework CaseStudy – PT Apexindo Pratama Duta Presented by Aditya Narendra Maharsi Angie Pritta Caroline Ahmad Ardiansyah Zein Bambang Wijarnako Pranoto Satrio Wicaksono
  • 2.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX The Content Company Profile Theoretical Background Performances Competing Values Analysis Conclusion & Recommended Strategies
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Company Profile Founder Hertriono Kartowisastro Vision A world-class drilling contractor offering quality without compromise Mission • Maintaining a high standard of Safety, Health, and Environment (SHE) to ensure the safety an welfare of employees and to protect the surrounding environment. • Providing maximum value to all of stakeholders and making a positive impact to the society and the environment. • Developing human resources with global-standard quality and competency.
  • 5.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Company Profile : Milestone 1984 Established as an Indonesian offshore Drilling contractor 1992 First submersible swampbarge rig, Maera 2005 ISO 9001 :2000 Certification in Quality Management System 2007 Super premium Jack up rig, Soehanah 2008 Upgrade the ISO 9001 :2008 version 2009 The Safety Campaign
  • 6.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Company Profile : Milestone 2000 Expand operation to Middle East 2001 Merged with PT Medco Antareja 2002 IPO : 10 July 2002 2012 PT Apexindo Energi Investama become the new majority shareholder of the Company 2009 Settled IDR Bonds Apexindo Pratama Duta 2011 Certification of ISO
  • 7.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Company Profile : Operation Onshore Offshore FPSO (Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading)
  • 8.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Company Profile
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX COMPETING VALUE Kerangka budaya organisasi yang dikembangkan oleh Cameron dan Quinn (1999) berdasarkan model teoritis disebut “Competing Values Framework” atau “Kerangka Nilai Bersaing“. Parameter atau Variabel yang dianalisa : • Concern for Task vs. Concern for People • Stability and Efficiency vs. Flexibility and Innovation • Internal vs external focus. • Long Term vs Short Term. • etc Theoretical Background
  • 11.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Theoretical Background CREATE COMPETECONTROL COLLABORATE
  • 12.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Theoretical Background Kuadran Ukuran Kuadran Pendekatan finansial yang digunakan Control Quality Gross margin Efficiency Asset turnover Compete Profit EVA Speed Change in EVA growth Create Growth Sales growth Innovation Standard deviations of market model errors Collaborate Knowledge Future growth values Community Sales/number of employees CREATING CVF FROM FINANCIAL EMPIRICAL DATA
  • 13.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Differentiation Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Cost Leadership Type of Organization Theoretical Background
  • 14.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Fit Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Stretch Type of Organization Theoretical Background
  • 15.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Best Cost Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Best Cost – Blue Ocean Type of Organization Theoretical Background
  • 16.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX COMPETING VALUE INDUSTRY VS COMPANY (example) Theoretical Background
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Performances No Type of Listing Listed Shares Listed Date 1 IPO (First Issue) @ Rp550,- 200,000,000 10-Jul-02 2 Company Listing 1,545,000,000 10-Jul-02 3 Rights Issue I 25:12 @Rp550 837,600,000 26-Sep-05 4 ESOP Converted (2005 to 2008) 77,250,000 5 Delisting -2,659,850,000 27-Apr-09 6 Relisting @ Rp1,562,- 2.659.850.000 05-Jun-20013 Listing History
  • 19.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Performances 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Stock Price Movement (1st Month) Offering Price at relisting (IPO) Rp. 1.562 (5 June 2013)
  • 20.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Performances Financial Statement 2013 2012 ∆ Current Assets 152,051,043 465,143,375 -67% Non Current Assets 638,859,911 246,580,991 159% Liabilities And Equity 119,109,331 79,115,039 51% Non Current Liabilities 389,280,099 399,189,027 -2% Equity 282,521,524 233,420,300 21% Revenue 259,595,002 208,757,661 24% Direct Costs 161,331,971 136,394,546 18% Gross Profit 98,263,031 72,363,115 36%
  • 21.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Performances Financial Statement 2013 2012 ∆ Income Before Tax Expense 68,855,235 35,449,657 94% Income Tax Expense - Net (19,616,096) (12,357,313) Net Income for the year 49,239,139 23,092,344 113% Other Comprehensive Income (137,915) (45,462) Total Comprehensive Income 49,101,224 23,046,882 Net income for the year 49,239,139 23,092,344 Total comprehensive income 49,101,224 23,046,882 Basic Earning Per Share 0.0185 0.0087 113%
  • 22.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Performances 3865 4946.09 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 APEX IHSG Stock Price Comparison
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Competing Values Analysis Financial data PT Apexindo Pratama Duta for creating CVF Quadrant Measures for quadrant Proxies used Company Sector Actual Adjusted Actual Adjusted Create Growth Sales growth 0.97 0.97 11.4 11.4 Innovation Standard deviation of market model errors 0 0.12 0.95 0.95 Compete Profit EVA (Economic Value Added)/ROA 6.55 6.55 7.23 7.23 Speed Change in EVA grwoth/ROA Avg 0 6.55 12.14 12.14 Control Quality Gross margin 37.85 37.85 26.79 26.79 Efficiency Asset turnover 0.35 0.35 0.81 0.81 Collaborate Knowledge Future growth values/capital spending 35.38 35.38 8.47 8.47 Community Sales/number of employess 6897311232 689.7311232 3334958240 333.495824
  • 25.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Competing Values Analysis Industry vs competing value company PT Apexindo Pratama Duta Type of organization 0.1 1 10 100 1000 I Innovation Growth II Speed Profit III Efficiency Quality IV Community Knowledge Company Sector Innovation Growth Speed Profits Efficiency Quality Community Developement Best Cost
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Conclusion • APEX could be categorized as the company with Compete and Collaborate culture. • In term of Quality, Community and Knowledge, APEX’s scores are higher than average sector’s scores. • In term of Innovation, Growth, speed and Efficiency, APEX’s scores are far lower than average sector’s scores. • APEX should have strategies to escalate the Growth, Speed and efficiency score at least close to the average sector’s scores.
  • 28.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Recommended Strategies • Increasing the ROA • Escalating the satisfaction of the existing clients and increasing the company performance to attract potential clients and investors. • Escalating QHSE Performance • Developing cost reduction (Cost Efficiency) Program • Developing Training and Development Program to increase the competency of the employee in order to support Cost Efficiency program and increasing the productivity. • Utilizing available IT system to support Cost Efficiency Program and Increasing the productivity. • Re-structuring the existing organization to achieve the efficient and Effective organization.
  • 29.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Strategic Mapping Financial PerspectiveCustomer Perspective Internal Business Process Perspective Learning and Growth Perspective ROA Satisfaction Trust Safety Perfor. Cost Efficiency Productivity Competency Restructuring IT System
  • 30.
    Competing Values Analysis- APEX Balance Score Card Perspective Objective Measures Target Financial Escalating the ROA The growth of ROA 10 % Customer Increasing the satisfaction of the existing clients Client’s complain 0 Complain Escalating the trust of potential clients New Project 1/year Internal Business Process Escalating the safety performance FATALITY 0 Property Damage 50 % Cost Efficiency Total Asset Turnover 10 % Increasing Productivity Total Revenue/Employee 20 % Learning and Growth Training and Development Program hour of employee Trained per year 16 h Using available IT Technology Business Intelligent 100 % Rel. Re-structuring No of Position 10 %
  • 31.
    Conclusion & RecommendedStrategies Thank You