This document compares column and beam design requirements between the Egyptian Code of Practice (ECP), British Standard Institute (BSI), and American Concrete Institute (ACI) codes. For column design, key differences are noted in the calculation of axial load capacity, minimum reinforcement, and effective height considerations. The ECP uses more conservative safety factors. For beams, differences are outlined in critical shear section location and equations for nominal shear strength.
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode IIijtsrd
National building codes have been formulated in different countries to lay down guidelines for the design and construction of structures. The codes have been evolved from the collective wisdom of expert structural engineers, gained over the years. These codes are periodically revised to bring them in line with current research, and often current trends. The main function of the design codes is to ensure adequate structural safety, by specifying certain essential minimum reinforcement for design. They render the task of the designer relatively easy and simple, results are often formulated in formulas or charts. The codes ensure a certain degree of consistency among different designers. Finally, they have some legal validity in that they protect the structural designer from any liability due to structural failures that are caused by inadequate supervision and or faulty material and construction. The aim of this project is to compare the design codes of IS 456-2007, ACI 318-11code and Eurocode II. The broad design criteria like stress strain block parameters, L D ratio, load combinations, formula will be compared along with the area of steel for the major structural members like beams, slab, columns, footing to get an over view how the codes fair in comparison with each other. The emphasis will be to put the results in tabular and graphical representation so as to get a better clarity and comparative analysis. Iqbal Rasool Dar "Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456:2000 and Eurocode II" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-1 , December 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18949.pdf
http://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/18949/comparision-of-design-codes-aci-318-11-is-4562000-and-eurocode-ii/iqbal-rasool-dar
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
This resource material is exclusively for the purpose of knowledge dissemination for the use of Civil engineering Fraternity, professionals & students.
This file contains state of art techniques adopted & practiced as per IS456 code provisions for analysis design & detailing of flat slab structural systems.
The presentation aims to provide clear,concise, technical details of flat slabs design.
The presentation deals with structural actions & behavior of flat slabs with visual representations obtained through finite element analysis.
The knowledge gained can be used for designing building structures frequently encountered in construction.
The presentation covers an important feature of slab systems supported on rigid & flexible support & clearly demarcates the minimum beam dimensions required to consider the supports to be either rigid or flexible.
The presentation alsoincludes clear technical drawings to highlight the importance of detailing w.r.t. rebar lay out - positioning & curtailment. Typical section drawing through middle & column strips are also included for visualizing rebar patterns in 3 -d views.
This presentation is an outcome of series of lectures for undergrad & grad students studying in civil engineering.
My next presentation would be on Analysis & design of deep beams.
Kindly mail me ( vvietcivil@gmail.com) your questions & valuable feedback.
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode IIijtsrd
National building codes have been formulated in different countries to lay down guidelines for the design and construction of structures. The codes have been evolved from the collective wisdom of expert structural engineers, gained over the years. These codes are periodically revised to bring them in line with current research, and often current trends. The main function of the design codes is to ensure adequate structural safety, by specifying certain essential minimum reinforcement for design. They render the task of the designer relatively easy and simple, results are often formulated in formulas or charts. The codes ensure a certain degree of consistency among different designers. Finally, they have some legal validity in that they protect the structural designer from any liability due to structural failures that are caused by inadequate supervision and or faulty material and construction. The aim of this project is to compare the design codes of IS 456-2007, ACI 318-11code and Eurocode II. The broad design criteria like stress strain block parameters, L D ratio, load combinations, formula will be compared along with the area of steel for the major structural members like beams, slab, columns, footing to get an over view how the codes fair in comparison with each other. The emphasis will be to put the results in tabular and graphical representation so as to get a better clarity and comparative analysis. Iqbal Rasool Dar "Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456:2000 and Eurocode II" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-1 , December 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18949.pdf
http://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/18949/comparision-of-design-codes-aci-318-11-is-4562000-and-eurocode-ii/iqbal-rasool-dar
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
This resource material is exclusively for the purpose of knowledge dissemination for the use of Civil engineering Fraternity, professionals & students.
This file contains state of art techniques adopted & practiced as per IS456 code provisions for analysis design & detailing of flat slab structural systems.
The presentation aims to provide clear,concise, technical details of flat slabs design.
The presentation deals with structural actions & behavior of flat slabs with visual representations obtained through finite element analysis.
The knowledge gained can be used for designing building structures frequently encountered in construction.
The presentation covers an important feature of slab systems supported on rigid & flexible support & clearly demarcates the minimum beam dimensions required to consider the supports to be either rigid or flexible.
The presentation alsoincludes clear technical drawings to highlight the importance of detailing w.r.t. rebar lay out - positioning & curtailment. Typical section drawing through middle & column strips are also included for visualizing rebar patterns in 3 -d views.
This presentation is an outcome of series of lectures for undergrad & grad students studying in civil engineering.
My next presentation would be on Analysis & design of deep beams.
Kindly mail me ( vvietcivil@gmail.com) your questions & valuable feedback.
Design of tension and compression members – Tanks, pipes and poles – Partial prestressing –
Definition, methods of achieving partial prestressing, merits and demerits of partial prestressing.
Design of concrete structures-Nilson-15th-EditionBahzad5
DESIGN of
CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Fifteenth Edition
David Darwin
Ph.D., P.E., Distinguished Member of ASCE
Fellow of ACI, Fellow of SEI
Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor and Chair
of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
University of Kansas
Charles W. Dolan
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of PCI
H. T. Person Professor of Engineering, Emeritus
University of Wyoming
Arthur H. Nilson
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of ASCE
Late Professor of Structural Engineering
Cornell University
Erbil Polytechnic University
Erbil Technical Engineering College
#Reinforced Concrete.
Lecture is in support of:
• Building Support Structures, Analysis and Design with SAP2000 Software, 2nd ed., eBook by Wolfgang Schueller, 2015. The SAP2000V15 Examples and Problems SDB files are available on the Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) website: http://www.csiamerica.com/go/schueller
• The Design of Building Structures (Vol.1, Vol. 2), rev. ed., PDF eBook by Wolfgang Schueller, 2016, published originally by Prentice Hall, 1996, 868 pages
General provisions for structureal steel building and structure (bnbc)Ferdous Kabir
General Provisions for Structural Steel Building and Structure (BNBC)
This section states the scope of the specification summarizes reference specification, Code and standard document and provides requirements for material and contract document
American Society of Civil Engineers
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
2010
--------------------------
Te invito a que visites mis sitios en internet:
_*Canal en youtube de ingenieria civil_*
https://www.youtube.com/@IngenieriaEstructural7
_*Blog de ingenieria civil*_
https://thejamez-one.blogspot.com
This publication provides a concise compilation of selected rules in the Eurocode 8, together with relevant Cyprus National Annex, that relate to the design of common forms of concrete building structure in the South Europe. It id offers a detail view of the design of steel framed buildings to the structural Eurocodes and includes a set of worked examples showing the design of structural elements with using software (CSI ETABS). It is intended to be of particular to the people who want to become acquainted with design to the Eurocodes. Rules from EN 1998-1-1 for global analysis, type of analysis and verification checks are presented. Detail design rules for steel composite beam, steel column, steel bracing and composite slab with steel sheeting from EN 1998-1-1, EN1993-1-1 and EN1994-1-1 are presented. This guide covers the design of orthodox members in steel frames. It does not cover design rules for regularities. Certain practical limitations are given to the scope.
Design and analysis of reinforced concrete multistory commercial building usi...Estisharaat Company
Design of multistory building by solving a sample manually ans rest of the building by solving on autodesk robot analysis, complete detailing of r.c members,final year project,complete ,how to design slabs, how to design beams, how to design rc column, how to make final year project, design of stairs,how to design foundations , how to prepare a project before using it in software for analysis,
Analysis and design of pre engineered building using is 800:2007 and Internat...Pratik R. Atwal
Abstract: In this report, comparison is made between IS800:2007 & International standards. The entire range of preengineered building is studied while doing this comparison. A school building is designed using IS800:2007 & International standards by keeping the loading parameters similar, all the loads are applied accordance with Indian codes. An attempt is made to study the variation in tonnage as per IS800:2007 & International standards & possible reasons for variation in respective results.
Design of tension and compression members – Tanks, pipes and poles – Partial prestressing –
Definition, methods of achieving partial prestressing, merits and demerits of partial prestressing.
Design of concrete structures-Nilson-15th-EditionBahzad5
DESIGN of
CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Fifteenth Edition
David Darwin
Ph.D., P.E., Distinguished Member of ASCE
Fellow of ACI, Fellow of SEI
Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor and Chair
of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
University of Kansas
Charles W. Dolan
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of PCI
H. T. Person Professor of Engineering, Emeritus
University of Wyoming
Arthur H. Nilson
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of ASCE
Late Professor of Structural Engineering
Cornell University
Erbil Polytechnic University
Erbil Technical Engineering College
#Reinforced Concrete.
Lecture is in support of:
• Building Support Structures, Analysis and Design with SAP2000 Software, 2nd ed., eBook by Wolfgang Schueller, 2015. The SAP2000V15 Examples and Problems SDB files are available on the Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) website: http://www.csiamerica.com/go/schueller
• The Design of Building Structures (Vol.1, Vol. 2), rev. ed., PDF eBook by Wolfgang Schueller, 2016, published originally by Prentice Hall, 1996, 868 pages
General provisions for structureal steel building and structure (bnbc)Ferdous Kabir
General Provisions for Structural Steel Building and Structure (BNBC)
This section states the scope of the specification summarizes reference specification, Code and standard document and provides requirements for material and contract document
American Society of Civil Engineers
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
2010
--------------------------
Te invito a que visites mis sitios en internet:
_*Canal en youtube de ingenieria civil_*
https://www.youtube.com/@IngenieriaEstructural7
_*Blog de ingenieria civil*_
https://thejamez-one.blogspot.com
This publication provides a concise compilation of selected rules in the Eurocode 8, together with relevant Cyprus National Annex, that relate to the design of common forms of concrete building structure in the South Europe. It id offers a detail view of the design of steel framed buildings to the structural Eurocodes and includes a set of worked examples showing the design of structural elements with using software (CSI ETABS). It is intended to be of particular to the people who want to become acquainted with design to the Eurocodes. Rules from EN 1998-1-1 for global analysis, type of analysis and verification checks are presented. Detail design rules for steel composite beam, steel column, steel bracing and composite slab with steel sheeting from EN 1998-1-1, EN1993-1-1 and EN1994-1-1 are presented. This guide covers the design of orthodox members in steel frames. It does not cover design rules for regularities. Certain practical limitations are given to the scope.
Design and analysis of reinforced concrete multistory commercial building usi...Estisharaat Company
Design of multistory building by solving a sample manually ans rest of the building by solving on autodesk robot analysis, complete detailing of r.c members,final year project,complete ,how to design slabs, how to design beams, how to design rc column, how to make final year project, design of stairs,how to design foundations , how to prepare a project before using it in software for analysis,
Analysis and design of pre engineered building using is 800:2007 and Internat...Pratik R. Atwal
Abstract: In this report, comparison is made between IS800:2007 & International standards. The entire range of preengineered building is studied while doing this comparison. A school building is designed using IS800:2007 & International standards by keeping the loading parameters similar, all the loads are applied accordance with Indian codes. An attempt is made to study the variation in tonnage as per IS800:2007 & International standards & possible reasons for variation in respective results.
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...azhar ahmad
The mode of driving precast reinforced concrete piles on site is without doubt among the most ‘error prone’ trades of a construction process. The short comings of driving pre designated piles at pin point accuracy at exactly the correct position on the ground has given rise to the caption of ‘pile eccentricity’ of nearly all individual piles within a pile group.
This then raises questions of integrity or how safe and reliable are pile caps that has been designed earlier with zero pile eccentricities. Questions of how much an eccentricity limit can be allowed for each pile or rather pile group arrangements such that previous pile cap designs are still safe and applicable has to be addressed. Thus one of the aims of this study is to evaluate the maximum allowable eccentricity of several common pile group arrangements. Results of this study indicates that the norm of adopting a maximum allowable eccentricity value of 75 mm for each individual pile irrespective of pile size, pile working load, pile spacing & column loads is quite misleading and may result in an unsafe pile group performance! Rather, results from this study suggests that the critical factor is not the eccentricity of individual piles but the overall net pile group eccentricity. This causes eccentric moments to act in the pile group which in turn governs the redistributed load to each individual pile within the pile group. This redistributed loads are then compared to the pile safe working load to establish a ‘Pass-Fail’ criteria.
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide LaboratoryBahzad5
الجامعة التكنولوجية
قسم هندسة البناء والإنشاءات
فرع هندسة الطرق والجسور
مختبر الأسفلت
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية
Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
:أعداد
م.د. زينب ابراهيم قاسم
م شرف مختبر الاسفلت
University of Technology
Building and Construction
Engineering Department
Highways and Bridges Engineering Branch
Asphalt Laboratory
CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR WORKS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONBahzad5
FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DES INGENIEURS-CONSEILS
CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT
FOR WORKS OF CIVIL
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
PART I GENERAL CONDITIONS
WITH FORMS OF TENDER AND AGREEMENT
FOURTH EDITION 1987
Reprinted 1988 with editorial amendments
Reprinted 1992 with further amendments
الشروط العامة لمقاولات اعمال الهندسة المدنيةBahzad5
الشروط العامة لمقاولات اعمال الهندسة المدنية ((بقسميها الاول والثاني)) المعدة من وزارة التخطيط مع اخر التعديلات عليها بغداد 2002
توزيع المكتبة القانونية - بغداد
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR CONTRACTS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING WORKS Bahzad5
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ
MINISTRY OF PLANNING
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
FOR
CONTRACTS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING WORKS
PART I & II
PREPARED BY SPECIAL COMMITTEE AND
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD
JUNE 1973
Dar Al-Hurriyah
Al-Jamhurriyah Press, Baghdad
The Planning Board at its fifth meeting held on 12/6/1972 approved
these conditions vide resolution No. 2 and enforced the distribution
thereof to Ministries and Public establishments to act accordingly when
announcing tenders and adhering to the application thereof in all
contracts of civil engineering works together with the observance of
accuracy in the application of the second part for these conditions as to
harmonize with the volume and nature of each contract.
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)ClaraZara1
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024) will provide an excellent international forum for sharing knowledge and results in theory, methodology and applications of on Machine Learning & Applications.
Hierarchical Digital Twin of a Naval Power SystemKerry Sado
A hierarchical digital twin of a Naval DC power system has been developed and experimentally verified. Similar to other state-of-the-art digital twins, this technology creates a digital replica of the physical system executed in real-time or faster, which can modify hardware controls. However, its advantage stems from distributing computational efforts by utilizing a hierarchical structure composed of lower-level digital twin blocks and a higher-level system digital twin. Each digital twin block is associated with a physical subsystem of the hardware and communicates with a singular system digital twin, which creates a system-level response. By extracting information from each level of the hierarchy, power system controls of the hardware were reconfigured autonomously. This hierarchical digital twin development offers several advantages over other digital twins, particularly in the field of naval power systems. The hierarchical structure allows for greater computational efficiency and scalability while the ability to autonomously reconfigure hardware controls offers increased flexibility and responsiveness. The hierarchical decomposition and models utilized were well aligned with the physical twin, as indicated by the maximum deviations between the developed digital twin hierarchy and the hardware.
We have compiled the most important slides from each speaker's presentation. This year’s compilation, available for free, captures the key insights and contributions shared during the DfMAy 2024 conference.
HEAP SORT ILLUSTRATED WITH HEAPIFY, BUILD HEAP FOR DYNAMIC ARRAYS.
Heap sort is a comparison-based sorting technique based on Binary Heap data structure. It is similar to the selection sort where we first find the minimum element and place the minimum element at the beginning. Repeat the same process for the remaining elements.
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningSUTEJAS
This presentation explores the concept of inductive bias in machine learning. It explains how algorithms come with built-in assumptions and preferences that guide the learning process. You'll learn about the different types of inductive bias and how they can impact the performance and generalizability of machine learning models.
The presentation also covers the positive and negative aspects of inductive bias, along with strategies for mitigating potential drawbacks. We'll explore examples of how bias manifests in algorithms like neural networks and decision trees.
By understanding inductive bias, you can gain valuable insights into how machine learning models work and make informed decisions when building and deploying them.
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
Student information management system project report ii.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project explains about the student management. This project mainly explains the various actions related to student details. This project shows some ease in adding, editing and deleting the student details. It also provides a less time consuming process for viewing, adding, editing and deleting the marks of the students.
Water billing management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project entitled “Water Billing Management System” aims is to generate Water bill with all the charges and penalty. Manual system that is employed is extremely laborious and quite inadequate. It only makes the process more difficult and hard.
The aim of our project is to develop a system that is meant to partially computerize the work performed in the Water Board like generating monthly Water bill, record of consuming unit of water, store record of the customer and previous unpaid record.
We used HTML/PHP as front end and MYSQL as back end for developing our project. HTML is primarily a visual design environment. We can create a android application by designing the form and that make up the user interface. Adding android application code to the form and the objects such as buttons and text boxes on them and adding any required support code in additional modular.
MySQL is free open source database that facilitates the effective management of the databases by connecting them to the software. It is a stable ,reliable and the powerful solution with the advanced features and advantages which are as follows: Data Security.MySQL is free open source database that facilitates the effective management of the databases by connecting them to the software.
3. INTRODUCTION
This comparison between codes provides minimum requirements
for design and construction of structural concrete members of any
structure in different codes, That doesn't mean that the structural
design safe in code and unsafe at the other one But this difference
due to factor of safety used, the quality control of materials used in
the construction …etc. as a result we have to study carefully those
differences between codes in order to we can do a smart design.
6. - Pu : العمود مقاومة
- Cc : الخرساني القطاع مقاومة
- Cs : العمود تسليح مقاومة
- : Factor of safety for material .
𝝲𝐶=1.5[(
7
6
)- (
et
3
)] ,
Egyptian code (2007)
𝝲s=1.15[(
7
6
)- (
et
3
)]
7. - The Existence of moment leads to a reduction in axial load capacity.
Thus the code impose a further reduction on the column strength by
reducing the capacity by 10% So, the equation:
Egyptian code (2007)
10. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
t ≤ 4 b
t ≤ 4 b
t ≤ 5 b
Conditions for column
(not shear wall)
The shape of cross
section of column isn't
taken into
consideration
The shape of cross
section of column is
taken into
consideration
The shape of cross
section of column is
taken into consideration.
Effect of shape of
column in slenderness
ratio.
11. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
0.4
100
Ag
1
100
Ag
0.6
100
Ag
Asmin
6% Ag
8% Ag
4% Ag for Interior col.
5% Ag for Edge col.
6% Ag for Corner col.
Asmax
155 mm
6 inch=150 mm
250 mm
Smax
30mm
25mm
70mm
Smin
12. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
Braced &
Un Braced
Sway & non- Sway
Braced & Unbraced
Classification of structure
according to buckling design.
Slenderness Limits For
Columns 𝐿0 < 60𝑏
Slenderness of
unbraced Columns
𝐿0 =
100𝑏2
ℎ
≤ 60𝑏
not braced against side sway
𝐾 𝐿𝑢
𝑟
≤ 22
braced against side sway
𝐾 𝐿𝑢
𝑟
≤34 – 12(M1/M2) ≤ 40
Rec. Circular
Braced 30 25
Unbraced 23 18
Maximum slenderness ratio.
𝐿𝑒 = 𝛽𝐿0
Values of 𝛽 for braced
columns
Non-sway
K Lu
r
≤ 34 -12 (
𝑀1
𝑀2
) ≤ 40
Sway
𝐾 𝐿𝑢
𝑟
≤ 22
Braced
𝐾𝐻
𝑏1 𝑜𝑟 𝑡1
< 15
Unbraced
𝐾𝐻
𝑏1 𝑜𝑟 𝑡1
< 10
Neglect slenderness effect if :
13. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Values of 𝛽 for
unbraced columns
Where:
𝐿0: clear height
between end restraints
b: width of column
h: depth of cross
section
𝐿𝑒:effective height of
column
K: effective length factor (for
braced (non sway) frame ≤ 1
Lu: unsupported height of
column from top of floor to the
bottom of the beams or slab in
the slab above
R: radius of gyration, equal to 0.3
and 0.25 times the overall depth
of rectangular and circular
columns , respectively
M1/M2: ratio of the moments at
the two ends of the column
حالة فى
يؤ جانبيا المقيدة المبانى فى األعمدة
طول خذ
االنبعاج
He
من لألصغر مساويا
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 0.7 + 0.05 𝛼1 + 𝛼2 ≤ 𝐻0
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 0.85 + 0.05 𝛼𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≤ 𝐻0
جانب مقيدة الغير المبانى فى األعمدة حالة وفى
يؤخذ يا
االنبعاج طول
He
من لألصغر مساويا
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 1 + 0.15 𝛼1 + 𝛼2 ≥ 𝐻0
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 2 + 0.3 𝛼𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≥ 𝐻0
α = Σ
Σ
𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑐
𝐻0
𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑏
𝐿𝑏
أن حيث
𝐻0
الخالص العمود ارتفاع هو
و
𝛼𝑚𝑖𝑛
من األصغر القيمة هى
𝛼1
الطرف عند
و السفلى
𝛼2
العلوى الطرف عند
Neglect slenderness
effect if :
14. BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
-Concrete not exposed to
weather or in contact
with ground:
Primary reinforcement,
Ties, stirrups, spirals………....40
Cover
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
15. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
- Notes:
- Column according to ( ECP ) is unsafe due to large factor of
safety although it is safe according to ( BSI & ACI ).
- As (BSI) < As (ACI)
21. BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
0.75dt or four times the web
thickness for flanged members
When V exceeds 1.8Vc, the
maximum spacing should be
reduced to 0.5dt .
∗ 𝑑/2
∗
𝑑
2
𝑜𝑟 200𝑚𝑚
𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚
Max spacing between
stirrups
Minimum practical spacing
≈ 3 in. or 4 in.
100𝑚𝑚
Min spacing between
stirrups
45° 𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒
30° 𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒
45°
Stirrups indention
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
24. Egyptian code (2007)
من التأكد أوال يتم
الخرساني القطاع
انه
آمن
اال المعادلة باستخدام
تية
:
𝑑 = 𝐶1
𝑀𝑢 ∗ 105
𝑏 ∗ 𝐹𝑐𝑢
Where:
d : depth of SEC.
Mu : Ultimate Moment Affecting on SEC.
b : Width of SEC.
Fcu : Characteristic Concrete Strength
C : Factor where Cmin=2.65 & Cmax=4.85
26. 𝑨𝒔 =
𝑴𝒖
𝑭𝒚 ∗ 𝒅 ∗ 𝑱
Where
Fy : Yield Stress
d : depth of SEC
Mu: Ultimate Moment Affecting on
Section
J: Factor Get It's Value From Table
According to Value Of C1
Egyptian code (2007)
27. قطاع من التأكد أوال يتم
الخرساني
المعادلة باستخدام امن انه
االتية
ال قيمة اليجاد
Rn
:
∅ 𝑅𝑛 =
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 ………… We can get Rn=√√√
Where
d: depth of Section.
Mu: Ultimate Moment Affecting on Section.
b: Width of Section.
∅ = 0.9
ACI CODE
28. Rn From Table (1-C) depend on Fc' & B1
𝑹𝒏 = 𝝆(𝟏 −
𝟎.𝟓𝝆𝑭𝒚
𝟎.𝟖𝟓 𝑭𝒄′) 𝝆 𝒎𝒊𝒏 ≤ 𝝆 ≤ 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙
ACI CODE
𝝆 𝒎𝒊𝒏 =
𝟑 𝑓𝑐′
𝑭𝒚 𝝆 𝒎𝒂𝒙 =
0.319 β1𝑓𝑐′
𝑭𝒚
Where Rn :STANDS FOR NOMINAL RESISTANCE (STRENGTH)
ρ: ratio of As to bd
β1 = 0.85 … for fc’ ≤ 4000 psi
= 0.85 - 0.05 (
𝑓𝑐′−4000
1000
) .… for 4000 psi < fc’ < 8000 psi
= 0.65 … for fc’ ≤ 8000 psi
31. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
0.0035
0.003
0.003
The Strain Of Concrete
𝜻𝑐𝑢
𝑏 +
𝐿
10
𝑏 +
𝐿
5
0.12𝐿 𝑂𝑟 6𝑡𝑠
0.25 L Or 8ts
𝑘𝐿
10
+ 𝑏 𝑜𝑟 6𝑡𝑠 + 𝑏 (L section)
𝑘𝐿
5
+ 𝑏 𝑜𝑟 16𝑡𝑠 + 𝑏 ((T section)
B1 section
32. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
Table (1-2)
* 3 𝑓𝑐′𝑏𝑤
𝑑
𝑓𝑦
Where:
3 𝑓𝑐′𝑏𝑤
𝑑
𝑓𝑦
≥ 200bw
d
fy
1.1
𝐹𝑦
𝑏𝑑
The least
1.3𝐴𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑞
the biggest
0.15
100
𝑏𝑑 𝐻.𝑇.𝑆
Minimum Area Steel
Asmin
0.9 c
0.85 c
0.8 c
Depth of compression
block
33. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
L.L > D.L
L.L > 3 D.L
L.L > 1.5D.L
Spans difference not exceed 20%
Conditions For using
Empirical Methods
Hagg + 5mm
Bigger
2.5cm
∅ ≥ 1 𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ
H.agg. + 5mm
Bigger ∅ 𝑚𝑎𝑥
∅ 𝑚𝑎𝑥
2.5cm
Min spacing
We Can neglect Normal
Force if:
𝑁 ≤ 0.1 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝑏𝑡
We Can neglect Normal if
e=M/N≤(1 in. or 0.05h)
We can neglect Normal
Force if :
𝑁 ≤ 0.04 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝑏𝑡
Moment & Normal
Sections
34. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
0.09 FL
𝑊𝐿2
16
=0.0625 𝑊𝐿2
=0.0625 F L
𝑊𝐿2
12
=0.083 𝑊𝐿2
= 0.083 F L
One Way slab
(+ve moment)
Intermediate span
Empirical
0.67
𝐹𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
0.85 fc'
0.67
𝐹𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
Concrete Strength
𝐾𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
= 5.5
𝑓𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑚
4490 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
=
= 57000 𝑓𝑐′ Ps
= 4200 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
= 4700 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
4400 𝐹𝑐𝑢 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
Concrete Young's
Modulus
36. BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
-Concrete not exposed to
weather or in contact
with ground:
Primary reinforcement, ties,
stirrups,
spirals..……….. 40
Cover
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
41. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
• One way slab
-simply supported slab
tmin =
𝑙
20
-one end continuous
tmin =
𝑙
24
-both ends continuous
tmin =
𝑙
28
-cantilever
tmin =
𝑙
10
Where 𝑙 is the direction of the
load
• One way slab
-simply supported slab
tmin =
𝑙
30
-one end continuous
tmin =
𝑙
35
-both ends continuous
tmin =
𝑙
40
-cantilever
tmin =
𝑙
𝟏0
Where 𝑙 is the direction of
the load
Thickness of slabs
42. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
• Two way slab
-fy = 280 (N/𝑚𝑚2
)
tmin =
𝑙
36
-fy = 420 (N/𝑚𝑚2
)
tmin =
𝑙
33
-fy = 520 (N/𝑚𝑚2
)
tmin =
𝑙
28
* Where
𝑙 : is long span length measured
face to face from support
• Two way slab
-simply supported slab
tmin =
𝑙
35
-one end continuous
tmin =
𝑙
40
-both ends continuous
tmin =
𝑙
45
* Where
𝑙 :is short span length
measured from center to
center
Thickness of slabs
43. BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
-Shells, folded plate members:
No. 19 bar and larger.....…..20
No. 16 bar, MW200 or MD200
wire, and smaller…………… 13
Cover
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
45. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
* Where
𝑙 :is long span length
measured from center to
center
Thickness of slabs
46. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
𝑙
𝟑
≤ Ldrop
tdrop min. = 1.25 tslab
𝑙
𝟑
≤ Ldrop
tdrop min. = 1.25 tslab
𝑙𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡
3
< Ldrop <
𝑙𝑚𝑖𝑛
2
Drop panel
47. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
tBeam ≥ 1.5 tslab
Effective beam section :
• Edge beam
b + hw ≤ b + 4 tslab
• Interior beam
b + 2 hw ≤ b + 8 tslab
tBeam ≥ 2.5 tslab
tBeam ≥ 3 tslab
Marginal
beam
48. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
1-Holes in areas bounded by column
strips:
that their greatest dimension in a
direction parallel to a centre-line of
the panel does not exceed 0.4 ɭ .
2-Holes in areas common to two
column strips:
that in aggregate their length or
width does not exceed one-tenth of
the width of the column strip
3-Holes in areas common to a
column strip and middle strip:
that in aggregate their length or
width does not exceed one- quarter
of the width of the column strip
In case of col. Strip intersecting with
col. Strip:
Lvoid ≤ ɭ1 / 16
In case of col. Strip intersecting with
middle strip :
Lvoid ≤ ɭ1 / 8
In case of middle Strip intersecting
with middle strip :
Opening in
the slab
49. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
And steel
Vu ≤ ∅ Vn ___ safe punching
Where : Vn = Vc+ Vs
Vs =
𝐴𝑣 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
𝑆
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
And steel
𝑞𝑝𝑢 ≤ 𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 ___ safe punching
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 only
Check punching
50. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Actual Punching Stress
ʋ=
𝛽 𝑽
𝒖 𝑑
Allowable Shear Stress (ʋc)
refer to table (2.1)
Max. Shear Stress
ʋmax= 0. 𝟖 𝒇𝒄𝒖
Check for Wide-beam action
Shear :
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅𝑉𝑛
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅(2𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑤𝑑
Check for Two way Shear
𝑉
𝑢 ≤ 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓:
1- 2 +
4
𝛽
𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
2-
𝛼𝑠 𝑑
𝑏𝑜
+ 2 𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
3- 4𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
Actual Punching Stress
𝑞𝑝𝑢 =
𝛽 𝑄𝑝𝑢
𝑏𝑜𝑑
Allowable Punching Stress
Min. of
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316(0.5 +
𝑎
𝑏
)
𝑓𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316 0.2 +
α𝑑
𝑏𝑜
𝑓𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
And not exceed that
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316
𝑓𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
Check
punching
51. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
If 1.6 ʋc < v ≤ 2 ʋc use :
If v > 2 ʋc use :
• Increase fc’
• increase slab thickness by
Using drop panel
• Providing shear
reinforcement
Av =
𝑉𝑢−∅ 𝑉𝑐 𝑆
∅ 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
if un safe punching
• Increase fc’
• increase slab thickness by
Using drop panel
• Providing shear reinforcement
( bars, wires , steel I shape
Or headed shear studs )
if un safe punching
• Increase slab thickness
• Use drop panel
Check punching
53. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Where :
ʋc : design concrete shear stress
V :design ultimate value of the
concentrated load.
uo : effective length of the perimeter
which touches a loaded area.
ʋ : design shear stress.
u : effective length of the outer
perimeter of the zone.
β: 1.15 for Interior columns
1.25 for Edge columns
1.40 for Corner columns
ΣAsv :is the area of shear reinforcement
fyv :is the characteristic strength of
shear reinforcement (in N/mm2
)
α : is the angle between the shear
reinforcement and the plane of the
slab.
Where :
V : Punching Force
𝛽: ratio of (long side/ short side) of
the column concentrated load or
reaction area
𝛼𝑠: 40 for interior columns
30 for edge columns
20 for corner columns
bo : perimeter of critical
section
Where :
Qpu : Punching Force
bo : Length of the Perimeter
of
Critical Sec
d : Effective depth of slab
𝛽: 1.15 for Interior columns
1.30 for Edge columns
1.50 for Corner columns
Check punching
54. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
1st take critical sec. at
distance (1.5d)
If ʋ ≤ ʋc use then no further
checks are needed.
If not
- take the critical sec. at
distance d/2 and get As for
shear
for Wide-beam action Shear
- Take critical sec. at distance
(d) from support.
for Two way Shear
- Take critical sec. at distance
(d/2) from support.
- take critical sec. at distance
(d/2)
Critical sec.
57. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
-In situ ribs should be
spaced at centers not
exceeding 1.5 m & should
not exceed four times their
width
-PAN WIDE (500-750)mm
PANS FORM
58. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
The minimum width of rib will be
determined by considerations of
cover , bar spacing and fire.
Standard depth :
6,8,10,12,14,16&20
We can use tapered rib
with dimension
RIBS
59. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
One at mid for span ( 6-9 )m
& 2 ribs at third points for spans over
(9) m.
Cross rib
60. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
-not less than 20mm or
1/10 clear distance between
ribs
Slab thickness over permanent
fillers shall be not less than
one-twelfth the clear distance
between ribs ,nor less than 40
mm .
Cover Slab
61. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Cover slab Rein.
Consideration should be
given to providing a single
layer of welded steel fabric,
having a cross-sectional area
of not less than 0.12 % of the
topping, in each direction;
the spacing between wires
should not be greater than
half the center-to-center
distance between ribs.
Reinforcement
62. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
1 hour:
(20)mm for slab
2 hour:
(25)mm for slab
Fire
resisting
63. BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
Shells, folded plate members:
No. 19 bar and larger ....... 20
No. 16 bar, MW200 or MD200
wire, and smaller……………. 13
Cover
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
65. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
Assume Thickness and Check
Shear
Assume Overall Footing
Thickness=33 in
Check Shear
< 300 mm
Thickness
70mm
75mm
mm50
للهواء والمعرضة المغمورة
mm70
والجفاف للبلل المعرضة
Min Cover
66. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Actual Punching Stress
ʋ=
𝛽 𝑽
𝒖 𝑑
Allowable Shear Stress (ʋc)
refer to table (2.1)
Max. Shear Stress
ʋmax= 0. 𝟖 𝒇𝒄𝒖
Check for Wide-beam action
Shear :
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅𝑉𝑛
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅(2𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑤𝑑
Check for Two way Shear
𝑉
𝑢 ≤ 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓:
1- 2 +
4
𝛽
𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
2-
𝛼𝑠 𝑑
𝑏𝑜
+ 2 𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
3- 4𝜆 𝑓𝑐′ 𝑏𝑜𝑑
Check shear
Actual Shear Stress
𝑞𝑢 =
𝑄𝑢
𝑏𝑑
Allowable Shear Stress
𝑞𝑠𝑢 = 0.15
𝐹𝑐𝑢
𝛾𝑐
Check punching
Actual Punching Stress
𝑞𝑝𝑢 =
𝛽 𝑄𝑝𝑢
𝑏𝑜𝑑
Allowable Punching Stress
As slabs
Check punching
Check shear
67. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
If 1.6 ʋc < v ≤ 2 ʋc use :
If v > 2 ʋc use :
• Increase fc’
• increase footing thickness
or
Using drop panel
• Providing shear
reinforcement
Av =
𝑉𝑢−∅ 𝑉𝑐 𝑆
∅ 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
if un safe punching
• Increase fc’
• increase footing thickness or
Using drop panel
• Providing shear reinforcement
stirrups
if un safe punching
• Increase footing
thickness
• Use drop panel
Check punching
68. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of
comparison
Where :
ʋc : design concrete shear stress
V :design ultimate value of the
concentrated load.
uo : effective length of the perimeter
which touches a loaded area.
ʋ : design shear stress.
u : effective length of the outer
perimeter of the zone.
β: 1.15 for Interior columns
1.25 for Edge columns
1.40 for Corner columns
ΣAsv :is the area of shear reinforcement
fyv :is the characteristic strength of
shear reinforcement (in N/mm2
)
α : is the angle between the shear
reinforcement and the plane of the
slab.
Where :
V : Punching Force
𝛽: ratio of (long side/ short side) of
the column concentrated load or
reaction area
𝛼𝑠: 40 for interior columns
30 for edge columns
20 for corner columns
bo : perimeter of critical
section
Where :
Qpu : Punching Force
bo : Length of the Perimeter
of
Critical Sec
d : Effective depth of slab
𝛽: 1.15 for Interior columns
1.30 for Edge columns
1.50 for Corner columns
Check punching
69. - COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
BSI
ACI
ECP
Point of comparison
If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
And steel
Vu ≤ ∅ Vn ___ safe punching
Where : Vn = Vc+ Vs
Vs =
𝐴𝑣 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
𝑆
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
And steel
𝑞𝑝𝑢 ≤ 𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 ___ safe punching
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 only
Check punching