This document discusses the history of concepts of the plant community in ecology. It describes how in the 18th century, naturalists like Linnaeus recognized that plants were interconnected ecologically and vegetation was distributed geographically. However, it was not until the early 19th century that Alexander von Humboldt established the study of vegetation as its own field. Humboldt advocated for empirically studying plant communities as discrete associations defined by their constituent species. This approach was adopted by many European and North American botanists in the 19th century, though there was debate around how to define and classify plant communities. The document traces the development of concepts like formations and associations used to characterize communities based on physiognomy or floristics.
The document traces the history and development of ecology from its early roots in the 18th century through present day. It discusses key figures like Carl Linnaeus, Alexander von Humboldt, Charles Darwin, and others and their contributions to establishing ecology as a recognized scientific discipline. Major developments included the establishment of biogeography, the ecosystem concept, succession theory, and recognition of humans as an ecological factor. Conservation efforts also stemmed from the growing field of ecology.
This document provides an overview of the history and development of botany, the scientific study of plants. It discusses how botany originated in prehistory as herbalism and the identification of edible, medicinal and poisonous plants. It then outlines key developments in botany, including the earliest recorded plant classifications from ancient texts, the contributions of Theophrastus and Pedanius Dioscorides in ancient Greece, the founding of botanical gardens in 16th century Italy, the development of plant taxonomy and binomial nomenclature by Carl Linnaeus in the 18th century, and modern developments in microscopy, genetics and molecular biology in the 19th-20th centuries.
This document provides an overview of botany and the history of botanical study. It discusses how botany originated from herbalism and the identification of medicinal plants. Key developments included the earliest plant classifications in ancient Greece and China, the modern binomial naming system of Linnaeus in the 18th century, and advances in microscopy that allowed the discovery of cells and tissues. Modern botany utilizes various techniques including molecular genetics, genomics, and biotechnology to study plant structure, function, development, taxonomy, and relationships at the molecular and ecological level.
1) Ecology developed as a field of study over thousands of years, with early concepts found in ancient Hindu and Greek texts from 600 BC and 370 BC.
2) In the 18th and 19th centuries, key thinkers like Linnaeus, Darwin, and Humboldt made important contributions relating to biogeography, natural selection, and interactions between organisms and their environment.
3) The term "ecology" was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866, and the field expanded in the 20th century with pioneering work by Shelford, Elton, Tansley, and Eugene Odum on concepts like food webs, ecosystems, and ecosystem ecology.
2 - Una breve historia de la sostenibilidad.pdfFabricioLozano2
The document provides a history of sustainability from ancient times to the modern environmental movement. It discusses how early thinkers like Malthus, Thoreau, and Marsh questioned beliefs around unlimited growth. The science of ecology developed in the 20th century and viewed nature as interconnected systems rather than isolated resources. The environmental movement emerged in the 1960s-70s sparked by books like Silent Spring and events like the first Earth Day. New laws in the 1970s protected the environment and addressed issues like hazardous waste sites.
An ecosystem consists of all the organisms and physical environment that interact in a specific area. Early Greek philosophers made early observations on natural history and ecosystems. Concepts like food chains and species relationships were developed starting in the 1700s. The term "ecology" was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 to describe the interactions between organisms and their environment. Ecology became an important field in the 1960s and 1970s as the environmental movement grew.
The document provides information on plant systematics and the history of botanical nomenclature. It discusses:
1) Plant systematics aims to reconstruct plant evolutionary history and divides plants into taxonomic groups using various data.
2) Three approaches to plant classification - cladistics, phenetics, and phyletics - are described.
3) The establishment of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) in 1930 provided internationally accepted rules for naming plants. The ICBN has been modified over time at successive International Botanical Congresses.
Ecology has a complex origin dating back to ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle who made early observations of natural history. Modern ecology emerged in the late 19th century as a more rigorous science. Key figures included Ernst Haeckel who coined the term "ecology" and Charles Darwin whose theory of evolution was a cornerstone of ecological thought. Ecology is defined as the scientific study of the interactions between organisms and their environment, and includes variables like species distribution, abundance, and changing states within ecosystems. It is a multidisciplinary field with applications in conservation, natural resource management, and human social systems.
The document traces the history and development of ecology from its early roots in the 18th century through present day. It discusses key figures like Carl Linnaeus, Alexander von Humboldt, Charles Darwin, and others and their contributions to establishing ecology as a recognized scientific discipline. Major developments included the establishment of biogeography, the ecosystem concept, succession theory, and recognition of humans as an ecological factor. Conservation efforts also stemmed from the growing field of ecology.
This document provides an overview of the history and development of botany, the scientific study of plants. It discusses how botany originated in prehistory as herbalism and the identification of edible, medicinal and poisonous plants. It then outlines key developments in botany, including the earliest recorded plant classifications from ancient texts, the contributions of Theophrastus and Pedanius Dioscorides in ancient Greece, the founding of botanical gardens in 16th century Italy, the development of plant taxonomy and binomial nomenclature by Carl Linnaeus in the 18th century, and modern developments in microscopy, genetics and molecular biology in the 19th-20th centuries.
This document provides an overview of botany and the history of botanical study. It discusses how botany originated from herbalism and the identification of medicinal plants. Key developments included the earliest plant classifications in ancient Greece and China, the modern binomial naming system of Linnaeus in the 18th century, and advances in microscopy that allowed the discovery of cells and tissues. Modern botany utilizes various techniques including molecular genetics, genomics, and biotechnology to study plant structure, function, development, taxonomy, and relationships at the molecular and ecological level.
1) Ecology developed as a field of study over thousands of years, with early concepts found in ancient Hindu and Greek texts from 600 BC and 370 BC.
2) In the 18th and 19th centuries, key thinkers like Linnaeus, Darwin, and Humboldt made important contributions relating to biogeography, natural selection, and interactions between organisms and their environment.
3) The term "ecology" was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866, and the field expanded in the 20th century with pioneering work by Shelford, Elton, Tansley, and Eugene Odum on concepts like food webs, ecosystems, and ecosystem ecology.
2 - Una breve historia de la sostenibilidad.pdfFabricioLozano2
The document provides a history of sustainability from ancient times to the modern environmental movement. It discusses how early thinkers like Malthus, Thoreau, and Marsh questioned beliefs around unlimited growth. The science of ecology developed in the 20th century and viewed nature as interconnected systems rather than isolated resources. The environmental movement emerged in the 1960s-70s sparked by books like Silent Spring and events like the first Earth Day. New laws in the 1970s protected the environment and addressed issues like hazardous waste sites.
An ecosystem consists of all the organisms and physical environment that interact in a specific area. Early Greek philosophers made early observations on natural history and ecosystems. Concepts like food chains and species relationships were developed starting in the 1700s. The term "ecology" was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 to describe the interactions between organisms and their environment. Ecology became an important field in the 1960s and 1970s as the environmental movement grew.
The document provides information on plant systematics and the history of botanical nomenclature. It discusses:
1) Plant systematics aims to reconstruct plant evolutionary history and divides plants into taxonomic groups using various data.
2) Three approaches to plant classification - cladistics, phenetics, and phyletics - are described.
3) The establishment of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) in 1930 provided internationally accepted rules for naming plants. The ICBN has been modified over time at successive International Botanical Congresses.
Ecology has a complex origin dating back to ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle who made early observations of natural history. Modern ecology emerged in the late 19th century as a more rigorous science. Key figures included Ernst Haeckel who coined the term "ecology" and Charles Darwin whose theory of evolution was a cornerstone of ecological thought. Ecology is defined as the scientific study of the interactions between organisms and their environment, and includes variables like species distribution, abundance, and changing states within ecosystems. It is a multidisciplinary field with applications in conservation, natural resource management, and human social systems.
Zoology is the branch of biology relating to the animal kingdom, including the structure, evolution, classification, habits, and distribution of animals. The history of zoology traces the study of animals from ancient times through the modern era. Key developments included the scientific revolution, cell theory, and Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Modern zoology involves research in fields like structural biology, physiology, evolution, systematics, ethology, and biogeography.
John William Harshberger is considered the "Father of Ethnobotany" for coining the term in 1895 to describe "the study of plants used by primitive and aboriginal people". Ethnobotany studies the interrelationships between human cultures and the plants and animals in their environment. It examines how indigenous groups use, view, and understand the importance of plants in their cultural and ecological contexts. Ethnobotany requires fieldwork to document traditional ecological knowledge through observation and gathering first-hand data on how communities have used various flora for numerous purposes over time.
Ecology is the scientific study of the interactions between organisms and their environments. The term was coined in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel, though ideas about ecology have existed for much longer. Key developments included Alexander von Humboldt describing relationships between plants and climate in the early 1800s, and Arthur Tansley coining the term "ecosystem" in 1935 to describe the interactions within a biological community and its non-living environment. Modern ecology research examines topics like population dynamics, community interactions, ecosystem processes, and human impacts on natural systems.
Ecology is the scientific study of the relationships between living organisms and their environment. It includes the study of ecosystems, communities, populations, and individual organisms. Some key areas of ecology include ecosystem ecology, behavioral ecology, community ecology, molecular ecology, human ecology, and metapopulation ecology. Metapopulation ecology examines population dynamics across patches within a landscape. Community ecology studies the interactions between species that coexist in a geographic area. Molecular ecology uses genetic techniques to study evolutionary and ecological questions.
During the 17th century, important developments in botany included Robert Hooke inventing the microscope in 1665, allowing close examination of plant cells. Anton van Leeuwenhoek later observed live cells under a microscope. Johannes van Helmont conducted experiments on tree water uptake. During the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus introduced modern taxonomy and plant classification. Gregor Mendel's experiments in the 19th century laid the foundations for genetics. In the 20th century, technology advanced the study of plant structures and genetics at the cellular level, while ecology emerged as a separate discipline. Modern research continues to enhance understanding of plant functions and applications in agriculture.
This document provides an overview of the taxonomy and classification of cultivated plants. It discusses the history of plant taxonomy from ancient Greek and Roman times through Linnaeus' establishment of binomial nomenclature in the 1700s. It also describes the development of different nomenclature codes and rules over time to standardize naming, including the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. The document uses examples like rice taxonomy to illustrate hierarchical classification systems and discusses ongoing debates around defining taxonomic ranks.
This document discusses several key concepts related to communities and succession in ecology. It defines a community as a group of interacting species living together in a shared habitat. Succession is introduced as the process of community changes over time, with species composition shifting as environmental conditions change. Several models of succession are described, including Clements' idea of orderly stages leading to a climax community and Gleason's more individualistic view. The roles of dispersal, biotic interactions, and environment in driving successional changes are also noted. Major global biomes like deserts and tundra are briefly outlined.
Topics Include :
Ecology
History
Habitat
Biome
Biosphere
Food Chain
Food Web
Tropical Level
Ecology
Definition
Ecology is the scientific study of the relationships between organisms and their environment. It examines how organisms interact with each other and with their physical surroundings, including other living organisms, the atmosphere, the soil, and the water. Ecology encompasses a wide range of scales, from individual organisms to entire ecosystems and even the biosphere as a whole.
Ecology
History of ecology
Certainly! Here's a more detailed overview of the history of ecology:
Ancient Ecological Knowledge: Ecological understanding can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where people observed and interacted with their natural surroundings. Ancient cultures, such as the Babylonians, Egyptians, and Indigenous peoples, practiced sustainable land and resource management based on their ecological knowledge.
The Enlightenment and Natural History: In the 18th century, the Enlightenment period brought a renewed interest in natural history and exploration. Naturalists like Carl Linnaeus classified and described species, while Alexander von Humboldt conducted extensive studies of ecosystems during his expeditions.
The Birth of Modern Ecology: The formal development of ecology as a distinct scientific discipline occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Several key figures made significant contributions:
Ernst Haeckel: Coined the term "ecology" in 1866 and emphasized the interrelationships between organisms and their environments.
Charles Darwin: Introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection, which laid the foundation for understanding the diversity of species and their interactions with the environment.
Frederic Clements: Developed the concept of plant communities and proposed the theory of ecological succession, which described the predictable changes in vegetation over time.
Henry Gleason: Challenged Clements' ideas and advocated for a more individualistic approach to plant communities, emphasizing the importance of individual species' responses to the environment.
Quantitative Ecology: In the early 20th century, ecologists increasingly employed quantitative and statistical approaches to study ecological processes. Individuals such as Raymond Lindeman and Arthur Tansley made important contributions to the development of mathematical models and statistical techniques in ecology.
Community Ecology and Food Webs: During the mid-20th century, ecologists focused on understanding the structure and dynamics of ecological communities. G. Evelyn Hutchinson emphasized the role of species interactions in community ecology, and Robert Paine conducted influential studies on keystone species and the importance of predation in maintaining ecosystem balance.
Systems Ecology and Ecosystems: In the 1960s and 1970s, ecologists shifted their attention to studying ecosystems as integrated systems. Pioneers like Howard
Ecology is the scientific study of organisms `at home' which is called as the `environment'. The term `environment' refers to those parts of the world or the total set of circumstances which surround an organism or a group of organisms.
This document discusses the history and definitions of ecological niches. It describes how early researchers like Grinnell, Elton, and Gause studied niches in birds, predator-prey relationships, and species competition. Hutchinson formally defined the niche in 1959 as the activity range along every environmental dimension. The niche includes all resources and conditions needed for a species to survive and reproduce. Hutchinson modeled niches as multidimensional hypervolumes. A species' fundamental niche is the total suitable conditions without competition, while its realized niche is the portion it actually occupies.
The document discusses key concepts related to environment, environmentalism, environmental science, and ecology. It defines environment as all conditions that surround and influence organisms. Environmentalism is described as a social movement focused on protecting the environment. Environmental science is defined as the interdisciplinary study of interactions between physical, chemical, and biological components of the environment and their effects on organisms. Ecology is presented as the scientific study of relationships between organisms and their environments.
History of insect ecology and components of environmentManish pal
The document provides a history of insect ecology, beginning with Ernst Haeckel coining the term "ecology" in 1869. Some important early contributors included Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in the 1600s, who developed concepts of food chains and population regulation, and Charles Darwin in the 1800s, who established the theory of evolution by natural selection. Foundations of modern ecology emerged in the early 1900s through the work of plant and animal physiologists studying insect environments and factors like climate, temperature, and humidity. Key developments in insect ecology concepts and models occurred throughout the 1900s, including works on niches, habitats, and predator-prey relationships. Modern insect ecology analyzes both abiotic environmental
Human ecology is an interdisciplinary field that studies the relationship between humans and their natural, social, and built environments. It draws from various disciplines like ecology, geography, sociology, and anthropology. Human ecology views populations as operating within specific space-time contexts and examines how environmental factors influence human demographics, behavior, and culture. It also considers how human activities impact the biosphere. Concepts in human ecology include carrying capacity, which represents the maximum population size an environment can sustain, and cultural ecology, which focuses on how the environment shapes human societies and cultures.
Plant communities are groups of interacting plant populations that occupy a common habitat. They can be characterized by their physiognomy, species richness, and other attributes. Historically, there have been three paradigms for understanding plant communities: Clements' view of communities as stable, climax superorganisms; Gleason's individualistic view of communities as arbitrary sections along environmental gradients; and the modern synthesis that communities are dynamic and influenced by both environmental factors and historical processes. Plant species distributions are constrained by abiotic factors like climate and soils as well as biotic interactions like mutualism and competition, causing non-random assemblages along environmental gradients. Habitats provide the biotic and abiotic context for plant niches within communities
The tallgrass prairies are dynamic ecosystems influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. Different plant species dominate in different areas depending on moisture levels and nutrient availability, which are impacted by factors like fires, grazing, and the activities of species like bison. Plants are the foundation of ecosystems, converting sunlight to energy and cycling nutrients, and they provide habitat and influence climate. Plant ecology studies the relationships between plants and their environment from individual to ecosystem levels.
This document provides an overview of taxonomy and the classification of life. It discusses the early development of taxonomy from Aristotle through Linnaeus and the establishment of the binomial nomenclature system. It also describes how Darwin's theory of evolution influenced taxonomy by establishing that classification should reflect evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry. Modern taxonomy incorporates various lines of evidence including morphology, embryology, biochemistry, and molecular data to reconstruct evolutionary history and classify organisms appropriately.
This document provides an overview of the history and development of taxonomy, the science of classifying living organisms. It discusses how early taxonomists like Aristotle and Linnaeus grouped organisms based on visible characteristics. Charles Darwin later established that taxonomy should reflect evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry. The document also outlines the major kingdoms and domains proposed by scientists over time to classify the diversity of life, from the original plant and animal kingdoms to the current three domain system of bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Molecular evidence now supports or refines previous taxonomic classifications.
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as Evo.docxrjoseph5
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as "Evolutionarily, endangered species preservation in the form of fossils and other forms indicates preservation of culture just as argued in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 whereby, organisms ought to be preserved even after death to mark their existence and evolution over the years." How do fossils apply to the ESA? And how can organisms be preserved after death, except in the case of museum specimens? From now on, please focus on explaining the ideas of our authors in your own words, rather than trying to sound "academic" or overly-complicated.
--
For next time, focus on answering the specific questions that are asked in the assignment. Rather than including information that appears to be from external sources, such as the genetically-oriented definition of evolution--which you NEED to cite to avoid committing plagiarism--this assignment should focus on the 3 Barrow rationales and relevant links from the Kingsland article.
Ecologists have long endeavored to improve ecologi-cal literacy. This goal goes beyond informing stu-
dents about environmental issues: one must excite their
interest in ecological science, regardless of whether or
not they intend to pursue the more advanced technical
and mathematical education that modern ecology
requires (Golley 1998). The challenge is to motivate
people to tackle difficult ecological problems. Fifty
years ago, G Evelyn Hutchinson (1953) observed that,
while students did not hesitate to dive into complicated
activities concerned with “electronic amplifiers and
with the explosive combustion of hydrocarbons”, they
traditionally viewed the majority of complex activities
as boring duties. “What we have to do”, Hutchinson
wrote, “is to show by example that a very large number
of diversified, complicated, and often extremely diffi-
cult constructive activities are capable of giving enor-
mous pleasure”. The kind of pleasure that Hutchinson
was thinking of involved the formulation of theory,
discovery, and problem-solving. Repairing the bios-
phere and the human societies within it, he believed,
ought to be as much fun as repairing the family car.
While people today are better informed about environ-
mental problems , engaging students in ecological
research and conveying what ecology is about to the
public is still challenging because of the complexity of
the science.
I will draw on historical examples to illustrate ways of
thinking that are characteristic of an ecological
approach to the study of nature. My list is by no means
complete. I touch only lightly on the classics of the eco-
logical canon, which are discussed elsewhere (Real and
Brown 1991; Keller and Golley 2000). Instead, I include
some lesser known examples from medical science to
highlight different contexts in which thinking ecologi-
cally has been important. Students should appreciate
that this kind of thinking integrates methods derived
from many fields of science an.
This document summarizes the concept of ecological niche. It discusses niche as a species' habitat requirements, its functional role in an ecosystem, and its position within a local community. Key concepts covered include the fundamental niche representing all conditions a species can persist in, versus the realized niche reflecting interactions with other species; competitive exclusion and limiting similarity regarding how similar niches can be for coexistence; and modes of coexistence such as niche differentiation and dominance hierarchies.
Zoology is the branch of biology relating to the animal kingdom, including the structure, evolution, classification, habits, and distribution of animals. The history of zoology traces the study of animals from ancient times through the modern era. Key developments included the scientific revolution, cell theory, and Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Modern zoology involves research in fields like structural biology, physiology, evolution, systematics, ethology, and biogeography.
John William Harshberger is considered the "Father of Ethnobotany" for coining the term in 1895 to describe "the study of plants used by primitive and aboriginal people". Ethnobotany studies the interrelationships between human cultures and the plants and animals in their environment. It examines how indigenous groups use, view, and understand the importance of plants in their cultural and ecological contexts. Ethnobotany requires fieldwork to document traditional ecological knowledge through observation and gathering first-hand data on how communities have used various flora for numerous purposes over time.
Ecology is the scientific study of the interactions between organisms and their environments. The term was coined in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel, though ideas about ecology have existed for much longer. Key developments included Alexander von Humboldt describing relationships between plants and climate in the early 1800s, and Arthur Tansley coining the term "ecosystem" in 1935 to describe the interactions within a biological community and its non-living environment. Modern ecology research examines topics like population dynamics, community interactions, ecosystem processes, and human impacts on natural systems.
Ecology is the scientific study of the relationships between living organisms and their environment. It includes the study of ecosystems, communities, populations, and individual organisms. Some key areas of ecology include ecosystem ecology, behavioral ecology, community ecology, molecular ecology, human ecology, and metapopulation ecology. Metapopulation ecology examines population dynamics across patches within a landscape. Community ecology studies the interactions between species that coexist in a geographic area. Molecular ecology uses genetic techniques to study evolutionary and ecological questions.
During the 17th century, important developments in botany included Robert Hooke inventing the microscope in 1665, allowing close examination of plant cells. Anton van Leeuwenhoek later observed live cells under a microscope. Johannes van Helmont conducted experiments on tree water uptake. During the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus introduced modern taxonomy and plant classification. Gregor Mendel's experiments in the 19th century laid the foundations for genetics. In the 20th century, technology advanced the study of plant structures and genetics at the cellular level, while ecology emerged as a separate discipline. Modern research continues to enhance understanding of plant functions and applications in agriculture.
This document provides an overview of the taxonomy and classification of cultivated plants. It discusses the history of plant taxonomy from ancient Greek and Roman times through Linnaeus' establishment of binomial nomenclature in the 1700s. It also describes the development of different nomenclature codes and rules over time to standardize naming, including the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. The document uses examples like rice taxonomy to illustrate hierarchical classification systems and discusses ongoing debates around defining taxonomic ranks.
This document discusses several key concepts related to communities and succession in ecology. It defines a community as a group of interacting species living together in a shared habitat. Succession is introduced as the process of community changes over time, with species composition shifting as environmental conditions change. Several models of succession are described, including Clements' idea of orderly stages leading to a climax community and Gleason's more individualistic view. The roles of dispersal, biotic interactions, and environment in driving successional changes are also noted. Major global biomes like deserts and tundra are briefly outlined.
Topics Include :
Ecology
History
Habitat
Biome
Biosphere
Food Chain
Food Web
Tropical Level
Ecology
Definition
Ecology is the scientific study of the relationships between organisms and their environment. It examines how organisms interact with each other and with their physical surroundings, including other living organisms, the atmosphere, the soil, and the water. Ecology encompasses a wide range of scales, from individual organisms to entire ecosystems and even the biosphere as a whole.
Ecology
History of ecology
Certainly! Here's a more detailed overview of the history of ecology:
Ancient Ecological Knowledge: Ecological understanding can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where people observed and interacted with their natural surroundings. Ancient cultures, such as the Babylonians, Egyptians, and Indigenous peoples, practiced sustainable land and resource management based on their ecological knowledge.
The Enlightenment and Natural History: In the 18th century, the Enlightenment period brought a renewed interest in natural history and exploration. Naturalists like Carl Linnaeus classified and described species, while Alexander von Humboldt conducted extensive studies of ecosystems during his expeditions.
The Birth of Modern Ecology: The formal development of ecology as a distinct scientific discipline occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Several key figures made significant contributions:
Ernst Haeckel: Coined the term "ecology" in 1866 and emphasized the interrelationships between organisms and their environments.
Charles Darwin: Introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection, which laid the foundation for understanding the diversity of species and their interactions with the environment.
Frederic Clements: Developed the concept of plant communities and proposed the theory of ecological succession, which described the predictable changes in vegetation over time.
Henry Gleason: Challenged Clements' ideas and advocated for a more individualistic approach to plant communities, emphasizing the importance of individual species' responses to the environment.
Quantitative Ecology: In the early 20th century, ecologists increasingly employed quantitative and statistical approaches to study ecological processes. Individuals such as Raymond Lindeman and Arthur Tansley made important contributions to the development of mathematical models and statistical techniques in ecology.
Community Ecology and Food Webs: During the mid-20th century, ecologists focused on understanding the structure and dynamics of ecological communities. G. Evelyn Hutchinson emphasized the role of species interactions in community ecology, and Robert Paine conducted influential studies on keystone species and the importance of predation in maintaining ecosystem balance.
Systems Ecology and Ecosystems: In the 1960s and 1970s, ecologists shifted their attention to studying ecosystems as integrated systems. Pioneers like Howard
Ecology is the scientific study of organisms `at home' which is called as the `environment'. The term `environment' refers to those parts of the world or the total set of circumstances which surround an organism or a group of organisms.
This document discusses the history and definitions of ecological niches. It describes how early researchers like Grinnell, Elton, and Gause studied niches in birds, predator-prey relationships, and species competition. Hutchinson formally defined the niche in 1959 as the activity range along every environmental dimension. The niche includes all resources and conditions needed for a species to survive and reproduce. Hutchinson modeled niches as multidimensional hypervolumes. A species' fundamental niche is the total suitable conditions without competition, while its realized niche is the portion it actually occupies.
The document discusses key concepts related to environment, environmentalism, environmental science, and ecology. It defines environment as all conditions that surround and influence organisms. Environmentalism is described as a social movement focused on protecting the environment. Environmental science is defined as the interdisciplinary study of interactions between physical, chemical, and biological components of the environment and their effects on organisms. Ecology is presented as the scientific study of relationships between organisms and their environments.
History of insect ecology and components of environmentManish pal
The document provides a history of insect ecology, beginning with Ernst Haeckel coining the term "ecology" in 1869. Some important early contributors included Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in the 1600s, who developed concepts of food chains and population regulation, and Charles Darwin in the 1800s, who established the theory of evolution by natural selection. Foundations of modern ecology emerged in the early 1900s through the work of plant and animal physiologists studying insect environments and factors like climate, temperature, and humidity. Key developments in insect ecology concepts and models occurred throughout the 1900s, including works on niches, habitats, and predator-prey relationships. Modern insect ecology analyzes both abiotic environmental
Human ecology is an interdisciplinary field that studies the relationship between humans and their natural, social, and built environments. It draws from various disciplines like ecology, geography, sociology, and anthropology. Human ecology views populations as operating within specific space-time contexts and examines how environmental factors influence human demographics, behavior, and culture. It also considers how human activities impact the biosphere. Concepts in human ecology include carrying capacity, which represents the maximum population size an environment can sustain, and cultural ecology, which focuses on how the environment shapes human societies and cultures.
Plant communities are groups of interacting plant populations that occupy a common habitat. They can be characterized by their physiognomy, species richness, and other attributes. Historically, there have been three paradigms for understanding plant communities: Clements' view of communities as stable, climax superorganisms; Gleason's individualistic view of communities as arbitrary sections along environmental gradients; and the modern synthesis that communities are dynamic and influenced by both environmental factors and historical processes. Plant species distributions are constrained by abiotic factors like climate and soils as well as biotic interactions like mutualism and competition, causing non-random assemblages along environmental gradients. Habitats provide the biotic and abiotic context for plant niches within communities
The tallgrass prairies are dynamic ecosystems influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. Different plant species dominate in different areas depending on moisture levels and nutrient availability, which are impacted by factors like fires, grazing, and the activities of species like bison. Plants are the foundation of ecosystems, converting sunlight to energy and cycling nutrients, and they provide habitat and influence climate. Plant ecology studies the relationships between plants and their environment from individual to ecosystem levels.
This document provides an overview of taxonomy and the classification of life. It discusses the early development of taxonomy from Aristotle through Linnaeus and the establishment of the binomial nomenclature system. It also describes how Darwin's theory of evolution influenced taxonomy by establishing that classification should reflect evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry. Modern taxonomy incorporates various lines of evidence including morphology, embryology, biochemistry, and molecular data to reconstruct evolutionary history and classify organisms appropriately.
This document provides an overview of the history and development of taxonomy, the science of classifying living organisms. It discusses how early taxonomists like Aristotle and Linnaeus grouped organisms based on visible characteristics. Charles Darwin later established that taxonomy should reflect evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry. The document also outlines the major kingdoms and domains proposed by scientists over time to classify the diversity of life, from the original plant and animal kingdoms to the current three domain system of bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Molecular evidence now supports or refines previous taxonomic classifications.
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as Evo.docxrjoseph5
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as "Evolutionarily, endangered species preservation in the form of fossils and other forms indicates preservation of culture just as argued in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 whereby, organisms ought to be preserved even after death to mark their existence and evolution over the years." How do fossils apply to the ESA? And how can organisms be preserved after death, except in the case of museum specimens? From now on, please focus on explaining the ideas of our authors in your own words, rather than trying to sound "academic" or overly-complicated.
--
For next time, focus on answering the specific questions that are asked in the assignment. Rather than including information that appears to be from external sources, such as the genetically-oriented definition of evolution--which you NEED to cite to avoid committing plagiarism--this assignment should focus on the 3 Barrow rationales and relevant links from the Kingsland article.
Ecologists have long endeavored to improve ecologi-cal literacy. This goal goes beyond informing stu-
dents about environmental issues: one must excite their
interest in ecological science, regardless of whether or
not they intend to pursue the more advanced technical
and mathematical education that modern ecology
requires (Golley 1998). The challenge is to motivate
people to tackle difficult ecological problems. Fifty
years ago, G Evelyn Hutchinson (1953) observed that,
while students did not hesitate to dive into complicated
activities concerned with “electronic amplifiers and
with the explosive combustion of hydrocarbons”, they
traditionally viewed the majority of complex activities
as boring duties. “What we have to do”, Hutchinson
wrote, “is to show by example that a very large number
of diversified, complicated, and often extremely diffi-
cult constructive activities are capable of giving enor-
mous pleasure”. The kind of pleasure that Hutchinson
was thinking of involved the formulation of theory,
discovery, and problem-solving. Repairing the bios-
phere and the human societies within it, he believed,
ought to be as much fun as repairing the family car.
While people today are better informed about environ-
mental problems , engaging students in ecological
research and conveying what ecology is about to the
public is still challenging because of the complexity of
the science.
I will draw on historical examples to illustrate ways of
thinking that are characteristic of an ecological
approach to the study of nature. My list is by no means
complete. I touch only lightly on the classics of the eco-
logical canon, which are discussed elsewhere (Real and
Brown 1991; Keller and Golley 2000). Instead, I include
some lesser known examples from medical science to
highlight different contexts in which thinking ecologi-
cally has been important. Students should appreciate
that this kind of thinking integrates methods derived
from many fields of science an.
This document summarizes the concept of ecological niche. It discusses niche as a species' habitat requirements, its functional role in an ecosystem, and its position within a local community. Key concepts covered include the fundamental niche representing all conditions a species can persist in, versus the realized niche reflecting interactions with other species; competitive exclusion and limiting similarity regarding how similar niches can be for coexistence; and modes of coexistence such as niche differentiation and dominance hierarchies.
Similar to Community_concepts_in_plant_ecology_from_Humboldtian.pdf (20)
This document discusses plant physiology and the relationship between plants and water. It specifically mentions transport of water and transpiration as key topics. The document was prepared by a group of 4 students: Alvenaya Hindayageni, Fadhila Humaira, Fira Wahyuni Putri, and Bilu Priscilia.
This document discusses plant taxonomy and classification. It describes the three subkingdoms that make up the plant kingdom: Protophyta, Thallophyta, and Embryophyta. Key characteristics and examples are provided for each subkingdom and their constituent phyla. The document also examines the class Angiospermae in depth, describing the distinguishing features of monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Common medicinal plant families from each group are listed. The structure of flowers and systems used to diagram and describe their parts are also summarized.
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...Sérgio Sacani
We present the JWST discovery of SN 2023adsy, a transient object located in a host galaxy JADES-GS
+
53.13485
−
27.82088
with a host spectroscopic redshift of
2.903
±
0.007
. The transient was identified in deep James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)/NIRCam imaging from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Photometric and spectroscopic followup with NIRCam and NIRSpec, respectively, confirm the redshift and yield UV-NIR light-curve, NIR color, and spectroscopic information all consistent with a Type Ia classification. Despite its classification as a likely SN Ia, SN 2023adsy is both fairly red (
�
(
�
−
�
)
∼
0.9
) despite a host galaxy with low-extinction and has a high Ca II velocity (
19
,
000
±
2
,
000
km/s) compared to the general population of SNe Ia. While these characteristics are consistent with some Ca-rich SNe Ia, particularly SN 2016hnk, SN 2023adsy is intrinsically brighter than the low-
�
Ca-rich population. Although such an object is too red for any low-
�
cosmological sample, we apply a fiducial standardization approach to SN 2023adsy and find that the SN 2023adsy luminosity distance measurement is in excellent agreement (
≲
1
�
) with
Λ
CDM. Therefore unlike low-
�
Ca-rich SNe Ia, SN 2023adsy is standardizable and gives no indication that SN Ia standardized luminosities change significantly with redshift. A larger sample of distant SNe Ia is required to determine if SN Ia population characteristics at high-
�
truly diverge from their low-
�
counterparts, and to confirm that standardized luminosities nevertheless remain constant with redshift.
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...Sérgio Sacani
Wereport the study of a huge optical intraday flare on 2021 November 12 at 2 a.m. UT in the blazar OJ287. In the binary black hole model, it is associated with an impact of the secondary black hole on the accretion disk of the primary. Our multifrequency observing campaign was set up to search for such a signature of the impact based on a prediction made 8 yr earlier. The first I-band results of the flare have already been reported by Kishore et al. (2024). Here we combine these data with our monitoring in the R-band. There is a big change in the R–I spectral index by 1.0 ±0.1 between the normal background and the flare, suggesting a new component of radiation. The polarization variation during the rise of the flare suggests the same. The limits on the source size place it most reasonably in the jet of the secondary BH. We then ask why we have not seen this phenomenon before. We show that OJ287 was never before observed with sufficient sensitivity on the night when the flare should have happened according to the binary model. We also study the probability that this flare is just an oversized example of intraday variability using the Krakow data set of intense monitoring between 2015 and 2023. We find that the occurrence of a flare of this size and rapidity is unlikely. In machine-readable Tables 1 and 2, we give the full orbit-linked historical light curve of OJ287 as well as the dense monitoring sample of Krakow.
Microbial interaction
Microorganisms interacts with each other and can be physically associated with another organisms in a variety of ways.
One organism can be located on the surface of another organism as an ectobiont or located within another organism as endobiont.
Microbial interaction may be positive such as mutualism, proto-cooperation, commensalism or may be negative such as parasitism, predation or competition
Types of microbial interaction
Positive interaction: mutualism, proto-cooperation, commensalism
Negative interaction: Ammensalism (antagonism), parasitism, predation, competition
I. Mutualism:
It is defined as the relationship in which each organism in interaction gets benefits from association. It is an obligatory relationship in which mutualist and host are metabolically dependent on each other.
Mutualistic relationship is very specific where one member of association cannot be replaced by another species.
Mutualism require close physical contact between interacting organisms.
Relationship of mutualism allows organisms to exist in habitat that could not occupied by either species alone.
Mutualistic relationship between organisms allows them to act as a single organism.
Examples of mutualism:
i. Lichens:
Lichens are excellent example of mutualism.
They are the association of specific fungi and certain genus of algae. In lichen, fungal partner is called mycobiont and algal partner is called
II. Syntrophism:
It is an association in which the growth of one organism either depends on or improved by the substrate provided by another organism.
In syntrophism both organism in association gets benefits.
Compound A
Utilized by population 1
Compound B
Utilized by population 2
Compound C
utilized by both Population 1+2
Products
In this theoretical example of syntrophism, population 1 is able to utilize and metabolize compound A, forming compound B but cannot metabolize beyond compound B without co-operation of population 2. Population 2is unable to utilize compound A but it can metabolize compound B forming compound C. Then both population 1 and 2 are able to carry out metabolic reaction which leads to formation of end product that neither population could produce alone.
Examples of syntrophism:
i. Methanogenic ecosystem in sludge digester
Methane produced by methanogenic bacteria depends upon interspecies hydrogen transfer by other fermentative bacteria.
Anaerobic fermentative bacteria generate CO2 and H2 utilizing carbohydrates which is then utilized by methanogenic bacteria (Methanobacter) to produce methane.
ii. Lactobacillus arobinosus and Enterococcus faecalis:
In the minimal media, Lactobacillus arobinosus and Enterococcus faecalis are able to grow together but not alone.
The synergistic relationship between E. faecalis and L. arobinosus occurs in which E. faecalis require folic acid
SDSS1335+0728: The awakening of a ∼ 106M⊙ black hole⋆Sérgio Sacani
Context. The early-type galaxy SDSS J133519.91+072807.4 (hereafter SDSS1335+0728), which had exhibited no prior optical variations during the preceding two decades, began showing significant nuclear variability in the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) alert stream from December 2019 (as ZTF19acnskyy). This variability behaviour, coupled with the host-galaxy properties, suggests that SDSS1335+0728 hosts a ∼ 106M⊙ black hole (BH) that is currently in the process of ‘turning on’. Aims. We present a multi-wavelength photometric analysis and spectroscopic follow-up performed with the aim of better understanding the origin of the nuclear variations detected in SDSS1335+0728. Methods. We used archival photometry (from WISE, 2MASS, SDSS, GALEX, eROSITA) and spectroscopic data (from SDSS and LAMOST) to study the state of SDSS1335+0728 prior to December 2019, and new observations from Swift, SOAR/Goodman, VLT/X-shooter, and Keck/LRIS taken after its turn-on to characterise its current state. We analysed the variability of SDSS1335+0728 in the X-ray/UV/optical/mid-infrared range, modelled its spectral energy distribution prior to and after December 2019, and studied the evolution of its UV/optical spectra. Results. From our multi-wavelength photometric analysis, we find that: (a) since 2021, the UV flux (from Swift/UVOT observations) is four times brighter than the flux reported by GALEX in 2004; (b) since June 2022, the mid-infrared flux has risen more than two times, and the W1−W2 WISE colour has become redder; and (c) since February 2024, the source has begun showing X-ray emission. From our spectroscopic follow-up, we see that (i) the narrow emission line ratios are now consistent with a more energetic ionising continuum; (ii) broad emission lines are not detected; and (iii) the [OIII] line increased its flux ∼ 3.6 years after the first ZTF alert, which implies a relatively compact narrow-line-emitting region. Conclusions. We conclude that the variations observed in SDSS1335+0728 could be either explained by a ∼ 106M⊙ AGN that is just turning on or by an exotic tidal disruption event (TDE). If the former is true, SDSS1335+0728 is one of the strongest cases of an AGNobserved in the process of activating. If the latter were found to be the case, it would correspond to the longest and faintest TDE ever observed (or another class of still unknown nuclear transient). Future observations of SDSS1335+0728 are crucial to further understand its behaviour. Key words. galaxies: active– accretion, accretion discs– galaxies: individual: SDSS J133519.91+072807.4
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Candidate young stellar objects in the S-cluster: Kinematic analysis of a sub...Sérgio Sacani
Context. The observation of several L-band emission sources in the S cluster has led to a rich discussion of their nature. However, a definitive answer to the classification of the dusty objects requires an explanation for the detection of compact Doppler-shifted Brγ emission. The ionized hydrogen in combination with the observation of mid-infrared L-band continuum emission suggests that most of these sources are embedded in a dusty envelope. These embedded sources are part of the S-cluster, and their relationship to the S-stars is still under debate. To date, the question of the origin of these two populations has been vague, although all explanations favor migration processes for the individual cluster members. Aims. This work revisits the S-cluster and its dusty members orbiting the supermassive black hole SgrA* on bound Keplerian orbits from a kinematic perspective. The aim is to explore the Keplerian parameters for patterns that might imply a nonrandom distribution of the sample. Additionally, various analytical aspects are considered to address the nature of the dusty sources. Methods. Based on the photometric analysis, we estimated the individual H−K and K−L colors for the source sample and compared the results to known cluster members. The classification revealed a noticeable contrast between the S-stars and the dusty sources. To fit the flux-density distribution, we utilized the radiative transfer code HYPERION and implemented a young stellar object Class I model. We obtained the position angle from the Keplerian fit results; additionally, we analyzed the distribution of the inclinations and the longitudes of the ascending node. Results. The colors of the dusty sources suggest a stellar nature consistent with the spectral energy distribution in the near and midinfrared domains. Furthermore, the evaporation timescales of dusty and gaseous clumps in the vicinity of SgrA* are much shorter ( 2yr) than the epochs covered by the observations (≈15yr). In addition to the strong evidence for the stellar classification of the D-sources, we also find a clear disk-like pattern following the arrangements of S-stars proposed in the literature. Furthermore, we find a global intrinsic inclination for all dusty sources of 60 ± 20◦, implying a common formation process. Conclusions. The pattern of the dusty sources manifested in the distribution of the position angles, inclinations, and longitudes of the ascending node strongly suggests two different scenarios: the main-sequence stars and the dusty stellar S-cluster sources share a common formation history or migrated with a similar formation channel in the vicinity of SgrA*. Alternatively, the gravitational influence of SgrA* in combination with a massive perturber, such as a putative intermediate mass black hole in the IRS 13 cluster, forces the dusty objects and S-stars to follow a particular orbital arrangement. Key words. stars: black holes– stars: formation– Galaxy: center– galaxies: star formation
Signatures of wave erosion in Titan’s coastsSérgio Sacani
The shorelines of Titan’s hydrocarbon seas trace flooded erosional landforms such as river valleys; however, it isunclear whether coastal erosion has subsequently altered these shorelines. Spacecraft observations and theo-retical models suggest that wind may cause waves to form on Titan’s seas, potentially driving coastal erosion,but the observational evidence of waves is indirect, and the processes affecting shoreline evolution on Titanremain unknown. No widely accepted framework exists for using shoreline morphology to quantitatively dis-cern coastal erosion mechanisms, even on Earth, where the dominant mechanisms are known. We combinelandscape evolution models with measurements of shoreline shape on Earth to characterize how differentcoastal erosion mechanisms affect shoreline morphology. Applying this framework to Titan, we find that theshorelines of Titan’s seas are most consistent with flooded landscapes that subsequently have been eroded bywaves, rather than a uniform erosional process or no coastal erosion, particularly if wave growth saturates atfetch lengths of tens of kilometers.
PPT on Alternate Wetting and Drying presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Anti-Universe And Emergent Gravity and the Dark UniverseSérgio Sacani
Recent theoretical progress indicates that spacetime and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory. These ideas are best understood in Anti-de Sitter space, where they rely on the area law for entanglement entropy. The extension to de Sitter space requires taking into account the entropy and temperature associated with the cosmological horizon. Using insights from string theory, black hole physics and quantum information theory we argue that the positive dark energy leads to a thermal volume law contribution to the entropy that overtakes the area law precisely at the cosmological horizon. Due to the competition between area and volume law entanglement the microscopic de Sitter states do not thermalise at sub-Hubble scales: they exhibit memory effects in the form of an entropy displacement caused by matter. The emergent laws of gravity contain an additional ‘dark’ gravitational force describing the ‘elastic’ response due to the entropy displacement. We derive an estimate of the strength of this extra force in terms of the baryonic mass, Newton’s constant and the Hubble acceleration scale a0 = cH0, and provide evidence for the fact that this additional ‘dark gravity force’ explains the observed phenomena in galaxies and clusters currently attributed to dark matter.
ESA/ACT Science Coffee: Diego Blas - Gravitational wave detection with orbita...Advanced-Concepts-Team
Presentation in the Science Coffee of the Advanced Concepts Team of the European Space Agency on the 07.06.2024.
Speaker: Diego Blas (IFAE/ICREA)
Title: Gravitational wave detection with orbital motion of Moon and artificial
Abstract:
In this talk I will describe some recent ideas to find gravitational waves from supermassive black holes or of primordial origin by studying their secular effect on the orbital motion of the Moon or satellites that are laser ranged.
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptxshubhijain836
Centrifugation is a powerful technique used in laboratories to separate components of a heterogeneous mixture based on their density. This process utilizes centrifugal force to rapidly spin samples, causing denser particles to migrate outward more quickly than lighter ones. As a result, distinct layers form within the sample tube, allowing for easy isolation and purification of target substances.
CLASS 12th CHEMISTRY SOLID STATE ppt (Animated)eitps1506
Description:
Dive into the fascinating realm of solid-state physics with our meticulously crafted online PowerPoint presentation. This immersive educational resource offers a comprehensive exploration of the fundamental concepts, theories, and applications within the realm of solid-state physics.
From crystalline structures to semiconductor devices, this presentation delves into the intricate principles governing the behavior of solids, providing clear explanations and illustrative examples to enhance understanding. Whether you're a student delving into the subject for the first time or a seasoned researcher seeking to deepen your knowledge, our presentation offers valuable insights and in-depth analyses to cater to various levels of expertise.
Key topics covered include:
Crystal Structures: Unravel the mysteries of crystalline arrangements and their significance in determining material properties.
Band Theory: Explore the electronic band structure of solids and understand how it influences their conductive properties.
Semiconductor Physics: Delve into the behavior of semiconductors, including doping, carrier transport, and device applications.
Magnetic Properties: Investigate the magnetic behavior of solids, including ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and ferrimagnetism.
Optical Properties: Examine the interaction of light with solids, including absorption, reflection, and transmission phenomena.
With visually engaging slides, informative content, and interactive elements, our online PowerPoint presentation serves as a valuable resource for students, educators, and enthusiasts alike, facilitating a deeper understanding of the captivating world of solid-state physics. Explore the intricacies of solid-state materials and unlock the secrets behind their remarkable properties with our comprehensive presentation.
2. 96 M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology
1789). Similar ideas had, however, already been well devel-
oped in the earlier work of Carl Linnaeus (Egerton, 2007).
As a widely travelled, practical collector of plants, Lin-
naeus knew that plant species tended to grow in characteris-
tic “stations”, a concept broadly similar to the modern idea
of “habitat” (Linnaeus, 1762; Limoges, 1972). He observed,
moreover, that groups of different species tend to be found
growing together in similar situations, as in his famous floris-
tic characterisations of the bog and marsh vegetation of Scan-
dinavia (Du Rietz, 1957). Linnaeus also described the zona-
tion of vegetation around the shores of lakes, and noted how,
over time, the plants of one zone replaced those of another.
Both Linnaeus and Albrecht von Haller described the alti-
tudinal zonation of vegetation on the slopes of mountains
(Browne, 1983).
Eighteenth-century naturalists were, thus, well aware that
vegetation was distributed geographically and that species
were interdependent upon one another. Botanists frequently
found it convenient to refer to vegetational features, em-
ploying layperson’s terminology for this purpose. Such ref-
erences were often quite specific. Linnaeus, for example, in
his Philosophia Botanica of 1751 distinguished twenty-five
different plant habitats and gave the genera characteristic of
each one (Moss, 1910, p. 27). He was often very perceptive
in his remarks on the distribution of vegetation. But all his
observations on vegetation in this context were made as an
adjunct to his concerns in plant collecting and systematics –
they were secondary to his floristic activities. Reference to
vegetational features allowed him to specify more accurately
the species he was describing and where it was to be found.
Around the turn of the eighteenth century, the German
botanist Karl Ludwig Willdenow made observations of, and
theorised about, the relationship between climate and the ge-
ography of plants (1792, 1805, p. 337). His Principles of
Botany contained much fine observation of vegetation. There
was, for instance, a perceptive account of what was later to
be termed “plant succession”:
The decay of these mosses and smaller plants pro-
duces, by degrees, a thin stratum of earth, which
increases with years, and now even allows some
shrubs and trees to grow in it, till finally, after
a long series of years, where once naked barren
rocks stood, larger forests with their magnificent
branches delight the wanderer’s eye (Willdenow,
1805, p. 393–394).
Willdenow also described the corresponding successional
process which begins with open water. But, like Linnaeus,
Willdenow did not investigate vegetation for its own sake.
His remarks on vegetational development, as on other vege-
tational matters, remained incidental to his floristic concerns.
3 Alexander von Humboldt and the origins of
vegetational geography
However, it was the work of one of Willdenow’s students
that established the study of vegetation as a distinctive and
autonomous form of scientific inquiry (Nicolson, 1987). In
1793, Alexander von Humboldt first set out the programme
for a new form of plant geography, which was distinctively
different from the floristic studies of the Linnean tradition.
He argued that botanists should not confine themselves to the
study of descriptive taxonomy and nomenclature, nor should
they be preoccupied with the distribution of individual plant
species. The central concern of the plant geographer should
be, by contrast, the collective phenomena of vegetation:
Observation of individual parts of trees or grass
is by no means to be considered plant geography;
rather plant geography traces the connections and
relations by which all plants are bound together
among themselves, designates in what lands they
are found, in what atmospheric conditions they live
(von Humboldt, 1793, p. 9–10; Hartshorne, 1958,
p. 100).
Fourteen years later, Humboldt published a fuller outline
of the new plant geography, the Essai sur la géographie
des plantes (von Humboldt and Bonpland, 1807, 2009).
The Essai contains an elaborate engraving, entitled Tableau
physique des Andes et pays voisins, which depicts a cross-
sectional profile of the Andes, from coast to coast. In this pic-
ture are mapped or tabulated: which plant and animal species
live where, where the altitudinal zones of vegetation begin
and end, the underlying geological structures, and physical
or meteorological data. The object was to give, in a single il-
lustration, a complete impression of a natural vegetational re-
gion – the “régions équinoctiales” of South America (Nicol-
son, 1996a).
The Tableau physique also represented more local differ-
entiation. Within the “régions équinoctiales” were found,
high on the mountains, a “région des lichens” and, lower
down, a “région des Cinchona”. These smaller sorts of veg-
etational region were characterised by physiognomic life
forms, by the general appearance and habit of growth of
the constituent plants. For example, “régions des lichens”
were distinguishable by the obvious profusion of a number
of species, all with the same lichenous life form. The study of
plant physiognomy was an important feature of Humboldt’s
botanical enterprise and was one of the most decisive ways in
which he departed from Linnaean taxonomic methods. Clas-
sification of vegetation by life form was essentially indepen-
dent of floristic systems.
Humboldt’s plant geography was a thoroughly empirical
investigation of the environment of plants. A large number
of instruments were used to measure a wide variety of phys-
ical parameters. The readings were tabulated, compared be-
tween different sites, and correlated with the occurrence of
Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013 www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/
3. M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology 97
the various types of vegetation. It was hoped that such corre-
lations would reveal the laws that governed the distribution
of vegetation.
Humboldt was the first to call communities of plants “as-
sociations”. He used the term informally: “The heaths, that
association of erica vulgaris, of erica tetralix and the lichens
icmadophilia and haemotomma” (von Humboldt and Bon-
pland, 1807, p. 17, my translation). But it was not long be-
fore the term “association” became a technical one meaning
a more or less definite plant community.
4 Humboldtian plant geography in the nineteenth
century
The Danish botanist, Joachim Schouw, was one of the first
to embrace Humboldt’s programme for a vegetational plant
geography. In 1823, he invented a nomenclature for associ-
ations, adding the suffix “-etum” to the generic name of the
dominant plant. For example, “Fagetum” indicated a com-
munity dominated by a species of Fagus, the beech tree
(Schouw, 1823, p. 165).
Another early exponent of Humboldtian plant geography
was Franz Meyen, whose Grundriss der Pflanzengeographie
appeared in 1836, with an English translation (Outline of
the Geography of Plants) ten years later. Meyen made a
sustained attempt to correlate the distribution of vegetation
with physical variables, such as heat and moisture. Follow-
ing Humboldt, one of Meyen’s main concerns was the study
of physiognomy, and his identification of vegetational units
was based principally upon life form (Meyen, 1846).
The classification of vegetation according to physiognomy
was further developed by August Grisebach, who introduced
a new vegetational term, “formation”:
I would term a group of plants which bears a defi-
nite physiognomic character, such as meadow ...
a phytogeographic formation. The latter may be
characterized by a single social species, by a com-
plex of dominant species belonging to one family,
or ... it may show an aggregate of species, which,
although of various taxonomic character, have a
common peculiarity; thus the alpine meadow con-
sists almost exclusively of perennial herbs (Grise-
bach, 1838; Clements, 1916a, p. 116–117).
It became conventional to use the term “association”, often
with the “-etum” suffix, to refer to vegetation types charac-
terised by floristic criteria, and the term ‘formation’ to refer
to types characterised by physiognomy, as in Grisebach’s ex-
amples. Grisebach’s programme of research culminated with
the publication, in 1872, of his monumental Die Vegetation
der Erde nach Ihrer Klimatischen Anordnung (The Vegeta-
tion of the Earth according to its Climatic Arrangement), the
first attempt to provide a comprehensive description and clas-
sification of the world’s vegetation. Fifty-four physiognomic
groups were recognised (Grisebach, 1872).
In the German-speaking countries, in France, and in Scan-
dinavia, the Humboldtian style of vegetational plant geog-
raphy was widely adopted (Nicolson, 1996b). Notable ex-
ponents were the Swiss botanists, Oswald Heer (1835) and
Jules Thurmann. Thurman made a very clear distinction be-
tween the study of flora and the study of vegetation:
A region’s flora is the enumeration and description
of all the species growing there ... without refer-
ence to their abundance ... a region’s vegetation
is the plant life by which it is covered; it consists
of the associated species of the flora in varying
quantity and size, some playing a prominent role,
others scattered and lost in the background ... A
land’s flora and its vegetation are two quite differ-
ent things which should not be confused: the first
means the numbers of the distinct plant species
which one observes, the second their proportions
and associations (Thurman, 1849, p. 22, my trans-
lation, emphasis in original).
In an important theoretical discussion, Henri Lecoq, Profes-
sor of Natural History at Clermont-Ferrand, clarified the dis-
tinction between “sociabilitie” – many plants of the same
species living together – and “association” – many plants of
different species living together (Lecoq, 1854, p. 58–90).
The Swedish botanist, Hampus von Post, and the Finn,
Ragnar Hult, both applied the methods of Humboldtian plant
geography to the vegetation of Northern Europe (Nicolson,
1996b). Von Post urged his fellow Scandinavian botanists to
follow Humboldt and adopt a physiognomic approach to the
investigation of “those associations of several plant species
which together occupy a similar place ... on the earth’s sur-
face” (von Post, 1862). In his work on the vegetation of Swe-
den, von Post organised individual plots into associations
and then classified these local associations into vegetations-
grupper, a category roughly corresponding in status to Grise-
bach’s “formation”, if smaller in size (Whittaker, 1962). Von
Post also emphasised the importance of studying the interac-
tions between the different species of plants within the asso-
ciation.
Like von Post, Hult developed a strictly physiognomic sys-
tem in which both life forms and the vegetation units based
upon them were narrowly defined. He argued that classifica-
tion should be based solely upon the plant life forms and not
upon features of the physical environment:
Because if one is to go ... to a moor in the mid-
dle of Finland, one can see there in an area, where
no differences in the chemical or physical condi-
tions can be shown, at least two sharply divided
plant groupings alternating in patches. One is an
even and dense mass of Clandina silvatica, with
other lichens sprinkled in, as well as Polytricha and
low Empetrum; the other is a similarly thick and
even mat of Calluna vulgaris, with a sparse under-
growth of Cladonia, Hylcomia and Polytricha, as
www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/ Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013
4. 98 M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology
well as ... a few other plants. Here we can thus see
an intimate mixture on the same location of two
plant communities, which are in sharp contrast to
each other (Hult, 1881, p. 9).
In these accounts of Nordic vegetation, we can discern em-
phases that were to become characteristic of the Uppsala
school of phytosociology in the twentieth century – the
recognition of relatively small vegetation units by physiog-
nomic criteria and species composition rather than by envi-
ronmental factors (Moss, 1910).
Thus, by the end of the nineteenth century, vegetation
science was a flourishing enterprise and regional schools
had begun to differentiate. In Southern Europe, the Zurich–
Montpellier style of plant geography was developed by
Carl Schröter and Charles Flahault (Becking, 1957; Braun-
Blanquet, 1968). Schröter and his colleagues employed a
concept of the plant community that was recognisable largely
by floristic criteria. Schröter and Flahault’s definition of the
basic unit of vegetation was adopted by the International
Botanical Congress in 1910:
An association is a plant community of definite
floristic composition, presenting a uniform phys-
iognomy and growing in uniform habitat condi-
tions (Pavillard, 1935, p. 211).
The Swiss/French emphasis on floristic composition as
the principal basis for the recognition of plant communi-
ties was further developed in the influential writings of
Robert Gradmann (1909) and, especially, Josias Braun-
Blanquet. Braun-Blanquet’s (1928) publication Pflanzensozi-
ologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde (translated into En-
glish in 1932 as Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Commu-
nities) became regarded as the paradigmatic text of the floris-
tic Zurich–Montpellier school of vegetation science (Van der
Maarel, 1975).
One of the leading pioneers of German plant geography
was Oscar Drude (1852–1933), who had worked with Grise-
bach and who continued his style of investigation. Like his
mentor, Drude put a strong emphasis on the unitary integrity
of the regional formation, the character of which was de-
termined by the regional climate (Drude, 1896). Formations
were, however, recognised as being internally heterogeneous
due to the impact of topography and soil type upon the plant
cover. Drude characterised the formation rather more floris-
tically than Grisebach, recognising smaller subsidiary units,
identifiable by locally dominant species.
The legacy of Grisebach’s Die Vegetation der Erde stimu-
lated many other botanists to study the relationship between
vegetation and environment, notably Eugen Warming (Good-
land, 1975; Coleman, 1986), whose major work Plantesam-
fund was published in Danish in 1895. An English trans-
lation, Oecology of Plants: An Introduction to the Study of
Plant Communities, appeared in 1909. Warming defined the
purpose of “Oecological plant-geography” as being to ad-
dress three questions – “Why each species has its own special
habitat? Why the species congregate to form definite com-
munities? Why these have a characteristic physiognomy?”
(Warming, 1909, p. 2–3). Warming sought to correlate the
distribution of vegetation with climatic and other physical
parameters, holding that physiognomic growth forms “stand
in perfect harmony with the environment” and that “plants
possess a peculiar inherent ... faculty by the exercise of
which they directly adapt themselves” to their surroundings
(Warming, 1909, p. 369–370). In other words, vegetation is
the creation and the expression of the environment – a very
Humboldtian conception.
Developments in morphology, evolution and physiology
also impacted upon the subject, as exemplified by Andreas
Schimper’s major textbook of 1898, Pflanzengeographie auf
Physiologischer Grundlage, translated into English in 1902
as Plant Geography upon a Physiological Basis. Schimper
classified the world’s vegetation into regions, formations and
smaller units, and investigated the different forms of environ-
mental interrelationships, drawing upon the developing un-
derstanding of plant physiology. Unlike Warming, Schimper
was a strict Darwinian (Cittadino, 1990, p. 97–133), holding
that the characteristics of each plant species were determined
by the mechanism of natural selection.
5 Divergent views – plant sociology, the
superorganism, or the individualistic hypothesis
Thus, by the beginning of the twentieth century, Humbold-
tian plant geography had been developed in a variety of ways
in different parts of Europe. In some places, floristic compo-
sition was regarded as the most important feature by which
plant communities were to be distinguished. Other schools
made physiognomy central to their classification systems.
In still other research programmes, greater weight was put
upon the relation between the plant community and the phys-
ical environment, which could be conceived of in either Dar-
winian or Neo-Lamarckian ways. However, for most of the
twentieth century there was an almost complete consensus
among plant ecologists that vegetation was indeed made up
of natural communities, recognisable, in principle, as dis-
crete entities with real boundaries. These units were held to
be part of the fabric of the natural world; they were not re-
garded as being the product of particular methods of classi-
fying vegetation. The pre-eminent British ecologist, Arthur
Tansley, succinctly outlined this research programme:
[I]f we admit, as everyone who has worked at the
subject does admit, that vegetation forms natural
units which have an individuality of their own and
that these units owe their existence to the interac-
tion of individual plants of different species with
their environment, then it becomes clear that a
mere study of the distribution of species as species
cannot form the basis of the science of vegeta-
tion. We have instead to focus our attention on
Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013 www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/
5. M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology 99
the vegetational units themselves (Tansley, 1920,
p. 120–121).
Similar views were expressed in the United States, for in-
stance by George Nichols, who defined the association as
“a vegetation-unit characterised by its essentially constant
physiognomy and by its essentially constant floristic com-
position” (Nichols, 1923, p. 17).
However, despite the fact that there was broad agreement
as to the existence of natural units of vegetation, there was
no consensus regarding the nature and extend of the puta-
tive unit or the exact basis on which it should be recognised.
According to some schools, particularly in Western Europe,
the vegetation unit was a small-scale, homogeneous com-
munity, whereas to most American ecologists, the associa-
tion was a large-scale unit encompassing much local vari-
ation. Thus H. S. Conard, using the methods of European
phytosociology, described 71 associations in central Long Is-
land, whereas Clements recognised only three in the entire
eastern deciduous forest of the USA (Conard, 1935; Weaver
and Clements, 1938; McIntosh, 1958). The level of integra-
tion which pertained within the community, however charac-
terised, was also a moot question.
In the early twentieth century, the study of the plant com-
munity developed rapidly in the United States. In 1898,
Roscoe Pound and Frederic Clements produced The Phyto-
geography of Nebraska, which was explicitly modelled on
Oscar Drude’s Deutschlands Pflanzengeographie. Clements
followed this with an impressive series of publications, cul-
minating in 1916 with Plant Succession: An Analysis of the
Development of Vegetation, which has been regarded as the
paradigmatic presentation of the Clementsian system (Tobey,
1981).
To Clements, the primary unit of vegetation was the “for-
mation”, which was large in area, encompassing much vari-
ation and including several regional “associations”. Forma-
tions were essentially physiognomic. Clements held, as a
matter of definition, that the true dominants of any formation
had all to be of the same life form, which was determined by
the regional climate. The formation was, thus, defined as the
“climax” community of an area over which the climate was
effectively uniform.
Clements credited the plant formation with a very high
degree of internal integration, describing the formation as a
“complex-” or “super-organism”.
The developmental study of vegetation necessar-
ily rests upon the assumption that the unit or cli-
max formation is an organic entity. As an organ-
ism, the formation arises, grows, matures and dies
(Clements, 1916a, p. 3).
Individual stands of climax vegetation were considered to be
the constituent parts of the formation as organism, presum-
ably to be thought of as the equivalent of the tissues or cells
of an individual, although Clements did not specify a pre-
cise analogy. Stands of vegetation within the area of a forma-
tion but physiognomically distinct were said to be connected
developmentally with the climax vegetation. These were the
immature forms of the superorganism.
Thus, to Clements, whatever vegetation fell within an area
of “effectively uniform” climate was, of necessity, all part of
the formation characteristic of, and controlled by, that cli-
mate. The processes of vegetational succession, soil matura-
tion and geomorphological base-levelling would, eventually,
if the climate were to remain constant, allow all the vegeta-
tion growing with the geographical limits of the formation
to develop into the highest form of vegetation possible under
the given climate. Only a single vegetation type could be re-
garded as true climax within any given climate. This was the
“monoclimax” theory.
In Plant Succession, Clements examined the effects of an-
imals upon plant communities and began to suggest that a
more complete understanding of the development of ecolog-
ical phenomena would emerge if the study of natural com-
munities encompassed animal populations:
No adequate treatment of this subject is possible,
however, until the interaction of plant and animal
communities at the present time is much better un-
derstood. Indeed, it seems certain that this will in-
volve not only the articulation of distinct but as-
sociated plant and animal communities, but the
recognition of actual biotic communities, in which
certain plants and animals are at least as closely
and definitely interdependent as the plants or an-
imals are among themselves (Clements, 1916a,
p. 319).
In the year that Plant Succession was published, Clements
explicitly expanded the scope of his basic community con-
cept. The principal unit of his ecological system became
the “biotic community or biome”, which comprised “all the
species of plants and animals at home in a particular habitat”
(Clements, 1916b, p. 120). To Clements, the biome forma-
tion was a highly organised entity with holist and emergent
characteristics:
One of the first consequences of regarding succes-
sion as the key to vegetation was the realisation
that the community ... is more that the sum of its
individual parts, it is indeed an organism of a new
order (Clements and Shelford, 1939, p. 21).
Clements supported this view of the plant community by
claiming affinity for it with other holistic theorists, such as
the philosopher and mathematician A. N. Whitehead, the en-
tomologist, William Morton Wheeler, and J. C. Smuts, the
author of Holism and Evolution (1926). There was a con-
siderable vogue for holism in the United States at this time.
Clements pointed, in particular, to the similarity between his
conception of the plant community and the views of Her-
bert Spencer on the emergent properties of human societies
www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/ Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013
6. 100 M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology
(Clements, 1935, p. 35; Nicolson, 1989). By “emergent”
properties was meant those features of the whole that were
not predictable from the study of its parts.
In according a central importance to succession in the
understanding of the plant community, Clements was in-
fluenced by the seminal studies of the sand dunes of Lake
Michigan that Henry Cowles had undertaken around the turn
of the century (Cowles, 1901). Cowles did not rival Clements
as a prolific author, but his students, such as W. S. Cooper,
dominated American ecology between the wars. Cooper ac-
cepted that plant communities were real entities, but did
not endorse Clements’ identification of them as highly inte-
grated superorganisms (Cooper, 1926). He also differed from
Clements in defending a polyclimax view, believing that
some local associations, of non-climax life form, were effec-
tively permanent, within any reasonable timescale. Cooper’s
view might be regarded as representative of the mainstream
of ecological opinion in the United States and Great Britain.
Nevertheless, he and most of his contemporaries agreed with
Clements that plant communities were discrete, natural enti-
ties, the main issue of debate being the degree and extent of
their internal integration.
There was one dissenting voice. Henry Gleason advanced
what he called an “individualistic concept” of the plant asso-
ciation (Gleason, 1917, 1926, 1939; McIntosh, 1975; Nicol-
son, 1990; Nicolson and McIntosh, 2002; for an alternative
perspective, Eliot, 2007, 2011). Gleason acknowledged that
plant communities could be studied and mapped in the field
and that their structure was the product of interaction be-
tween and among species. However, he denied that associ-
ations were highly integrated and that they were the funda-
mental units of vegetation. Gleason asserted that associations
have no functional properties beyond the sum of the agencies
and interactions of their constituent plants. Vegetation was
an assemblage of individual plants, with each species being
distributed according to its own physiological requirements
and competitive interactions with other plants. Species com-
position varied constantly in time and continuously in space.
The classification of vegetation was merely a matter of con-
venience.
6 Ecosystem theory
Gleason’s thesis was influential among the pioneers of gradi-
ent analysis of the 1960s, such as John Curtis (1959; McIn-
tosh, 1993; Nicolson, 2001) and Robert Whittaker (1951,
1953; Westman and Peet, 1982). However, ideas similar to
Clements’ concept of a high level of interspecific integra-
tion within the community unit may be discerned within
early systems ecology (Hagen, 1992; Simberloff, 1980). Eu-
gene Odum, for instance, emphasised that “unique princi-
ples ... emerge at the supra-individual levels or organisation”
(Odum, 1977, p. 1289; Taylor, 1988) and that adjustment to
the environment took place at the level of the ecosystem as a
whole:
We theorized that new systems properties emerge
in the course of ecological development, and that
it is these properties that largely account for the
species and growth form changes that occur ...
[T]here is a holistic strategy for ecosystem devel-
opment (Odum, 1977, p. 1290).
But these views were not universally accepted (McIntosh,
1980, p. 239–44). John Curtis, for instance, reacted strongly
against the approach to ecological theory developed by Eu-
gene Odum and his brother Howard: “Only by getting many
people to see the weakness of the Odum techniques will this
evangelistic school be restrained” (Curtis, 1961). Curtis par-
ticularly denigrated Howard Odum’s assertion that the then
current understanding of the tropical rain forest permitted
it being represented as embodying a stable “steady state”
(Curtis, 1961). Likewise the British ecologist, John Harper,
“harked back to the ‘individualistic’ interpretation of vege-
tation” (Harper, 1977a, p. 146) and vigorously expressed his
dissent from the homeostatic and maximal productivity the-
ses of the system ecologists:
For a long time (and still in some quarters) the view
has prevailed that the ecosystems of nature are too
complex for understanding – that all we can do is
to describe them – or to measure their function as
if they were whole organisms. This was the view
of some biochemists in the 30’s about the struc-
ture of proteins yet great leaps of understanding
were made by those who were prepared to sim-
plify the complexity and, as an act of faith, assume
that the complex whole is no more than the sum of
the components and their interactions. The devel-
opment of plant ecology into a predictive and rigid
science depends on a similar willingness (Harper,
1977a, p. 154).
Harper, moreover, regarded the holism of systems ecology as
incompatible with the Darwinian Synthesis.
A theory of natural selection that is based on the
fitness of individuals leaves little room for the evo-
lution of populations or species toward some op-
timum, such as better use of environmental re-
sources, higher productivity per area of land, more
stable ecosystems or even the view that plants in
some way become more efficient than their ances-
tors (Harper, 1977b, p. 777).
And indeed, more recent studies have tended to emphasise
that even complex ecosystems are characterised by instability
and non-equilibrium conditions (Bocking, 2013).
One looks in vain for any consensus as to the essential
characteristics of natural communities, or how best to clas-
sify them. As Robert Whittaker acknowledged, the roots of
Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013 www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/
7. M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology 101
these controversies seem to lie too deep for scientific obser-
vation or experiment ever to wither them away:
The basis of understanding and judging classifica-
tions cannot be one of literal verisimilitude or fi-
delity to nature. Rather than this, one finds that
classifications develop in accordance with whole
systems of interbalanced ... judgements ... A clas-
sification must be viewed as a cultural product,
understood in a context which includes both cul-
tural values and ecological conditions, and judged
in its functional relation to present understanding
and practice (Whittaker, 1962, p. 123).
Acknowledgements. I am particularly grateful to Sigidur
Oladottir, who rendered the work of the Nordic Humboldtians
accessible to me. Thanks also to the reviewers of an earlier version
of this essay.
Edited by: K. Jax
Reviewed by: F. N. Egerton and two anonymous referees
References
Becking, R. W.: The Zurich-Montpellier School of Phytosociology,
Bot. Rev., 23, 411–488, 1957.
Bocking, S.: The ecosystem: research and practice in North Amer-
ica, Web Ecol., 13, 43–47, doi:10.5194/we-13-43-2013, 2013.
Bradley, R.: New Improvements of Planting and Gardening, both
Philosophical and Practical, London, 3 Vols., 1718.
Braun-Blanquet, J.: Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetation-
skunde, Berlin, Springer, 1928.
Braun-Blanquet, J.: Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Communi-
ties, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1932.
Braun-Blanquet, J.: L’école phytosociologique zuricho-
montpelliéraine et la S.I.G.M.A., Vegetatio, 16, 1–78, 1968.
Browne, J.: The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeogra-
phy, New Haven, Yale U.P., 1983.
Cittadino, E.: Nature as Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the
German Empire, 1880–1900, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P., 1990.
Clements, F. E.: Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development
of Vegetation, Washington, D.C., Carnegie Institute, 1916a.
Clements, F. E.: The Development and Structure of Biotic Commu-
nities, J. Ecol., 5, 12–21, 1916b.
Clements, F. E.: Social Origins and Processes among Plants, in: A
Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by: Murchison, C. and
Worcester, M. A., Clark University Press, 1935.
Clements, F. E. and Shelford, V. E.: Bioecology, New York, Wiley,
1939.
Coleman, W.: Evolution into Ecology? The Strategy of Warming’s
Ecological Plant Geography, J. Hist. Biol., 19, 181–196, 1986.
Conard, H. C.: Plant Associations of Central Long Island: A Study
in Descriptive Phytosociology, Amer. Mid. Nat., 16, 433–516,
1935.
Cooper, W. S.: The Fundamentals of Vegetational Change, Ecology,
7, 391–413, 1926.
Cowles, H. C.: The Physiographic Ecology of Chicago and Vicinity:
A Study of the Origin, Development and Classification of Plant
Societies, Bot. Gaz., 31, 73–108, 145–182, 1901.
Curtis, J. T.: The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant
Communities, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1959.
Curtis, J. T.: Letter to H. J. Oosting, 10 February, 1961, Curtis
Papers, University Archives, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
1961.
Drude, O.: Deutschlands Pflanzengeographie: Ein Geographisches
Charakterbild der Flora von Deutschland und den Angrenzenden
Alpen-sowie Karpathenländern, Stuttgart, Engelhorn, 1896.
Du Rietz, G. E.: Linnaeus as a Phytogeographer, Vegetatio, 5, 161–
168, 1957.
Egerton, F. N.: Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature, Quart.
Rev. Biol., 48, 322–350, 1973.
Egerton, F. N.: A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 23: Lin-
naeus and the Economy of Nature, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer., 88,
72–88, 2007.
Eliot, C.: Method and Metaphysics in Clements’s and Gleason’s
Ecological Explanations, Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci.,
38, 85–109, 2007.
Eliot, C.: The Legend of Order and Chaos: Communities and Early
Community Ecology, in: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science
11: Philosophy of Ecology, edited by: de Laplante, K., Brown,
B., and Peacock, K. A., Philadelphia, Elsevier, 49–107, 2011.
Gleason, H. A.: The Structure and Development of the Plant Asso-
ciation, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 43, 463–481, 1917.
Gleason, H. A.: The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Associa-
tion, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 53, 7–26, 1926.
Gleason, H. A.: The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Associa-
tion, Amer. Mid. Nat., 21, 92–111, 1939.
Goodland, R. J.: The Tropical Origin of Ecology: Eugen Warming’s
Jubilee, Oikos, 26, 240–245, 1975.
Gradmann, R.: Über Begriffsbildung in der Lehre von den Planzen-
formationen, Bot. Jahr., 43, 91–103, 1909.
Grisebach, A. H. R.: Über den Einfluss des Climas auf die Be-
gränzung eer Natürlichen Floren, Linnaea, 12, 159–200, 1838.
Grisebach, A. H. R.: Die Vegetation der Erde nach ihrer Klimatis-
chen Anordnung, Leipzig, Englemann, 1872.
Hagen, J. B.: An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecol-
ogy, New Brunswick, Rutgers U.P., 1992.
Harper, J. L.: The Contributions of Terrestrial Plant Studies to the
Development of the Theory of Ecology, in: Changing Scenes in
the Life Sciences, 1776–1976, edited by: Goulden, C. E., Special
Publ. 12, Acad. Nat. Sei. Phila., Penn., 139–157, 1977a.
Harper, J. L.: The Population Biology of Plants, New York, Aca-
demic Press, 1977b.
Hartshorne, R.: The Concept of Geography as a Science of Space,
from Kant and Humboldt to Hettner, Annal. Assoc. Amer. Geog.,
48, 97–108, 1958.
Heer, O.: Beitrage zur Pflanzengeographie, Zurich, Orelli, 1835.
Hult, R.: Försök till Analytisk Behandling av Växtformationerna,
Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica Meddelanden, 8, 1–155,
1881.
Lecoq, H.: Etudes sur la Géographie Botanique de l’Europe, 9 Vols.,
4, Paris, Baillière, 1854.
Linnaeus, C.: De Oeconomia Naturae, in: Miscellaneous Tracts re-
lating to Natural History, Husbandry and Physick, edited by:
Stillingfleet, B., 2nd Edn., London, 37–129, 1762.
www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/ Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013
8. 102 M. Nicolson: Community concepts in plant ecology
Limoges, C.: Charles Linné: L’équilibre de la Nature, Paris, Vrin,
1972.
McIntosh, R. P.: Plant Communities, Science, 128, 115–120, 1958.
McIntosh, R. P.: Henry Allan Gleason, individualistic ecologist
1882–1975, his contribution to ecological theory, Bull. Torrey
Bot. Club, 102, 253–273, 1975.
McIntosh, R. P.: The Background and Some Current Problems of
Theoretical Ecology, Synthese, 43, 195–255, 1980.
McIntosh, R. P.: The Continuum Continued: John T. Curtis’s Influ-
ence on Ecology, in: Fifty Years of Wisconsin Plant Ecology,
edited by: Fralish, J. S., Loucks, O. C., and McIntosh, R. P.,
Madison, Wisconsin Acad. Sci., 1993.
Meyen, F.: Outline of the Geography of Plants, London, Ray Soci-
ety, 1846, reprinted by New York, Arno Press, 1977.
Moss, C. E.: The Fundamental Units of Vegetation, New Phytol., 9,
18–53, 1910.
Nichols, G. E.: A Working Basis for the Ecological Classification
of Plant Communities, Ecology, 4, 11–23, 1923.
Nicolson, M.: Alexander von Humboldt, Humboldtian science, and
the Origins of the Study of Vegetation, Hist. Sci., 25, 167–194,
1987.
Nicolson, M.: National Styles, Divergent Classifications: A Com-
parative Case Study from the History of French and American
Plant Ecology, Knowledge and Society, 8, 139–186, 1989.
Nicolson, M.: Henry Allan Gleason and the Individualistic Hypoth-
esis of the Plant Community: The Structure of a Botanist’s Ca-
reer, Bot. Rev., 56, 91–161, 1990.
Nicolson, M.: Alexander von Humboldt and the Geography of Veg-
etation, in: Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by: Jardine,
N. and Cunningham, A., Cambridge, Cambridge U.P., 169–185,
1996a.
Nicolson, M.: Humboldtian Plant Geography after Humboldt: The
Link to Ecology, Brit. J. Hist. Sci., 29, 289–310, 1996b.
Nicolson, M.: “Towards establishing ecology as a science instead
of an art”: the work of John T. Curtis on the plant community
continuum, Web Ecol., 2, 1–6, doi:10.5194/we-2-1-2001, 2001.
Nicolson, M. and McIntosh, R. P.: H.A. Gleason and the Individual-
istic Hypothesis Revisited, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer., 83, 133–142,
2002.
Odum, E. P.: The Emergence of Ecology as a New Integrative Dis-
cipline, Science, 195, 1289–1293, 1977.
Pavillard, J.: The Present Status of the Plant Association, Bot. Rev.,
1, 210–232, 1935.
Pound, R. and Clements, F. E.: The Phytogeography of Nebraska,
North, Lincoln, 1898.
Schimper, A. F. W.: Pflanzengeographie auf Physiologischer
Grundlage, Jena, Fischer, 1898.
Schouw, J. F.: Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Pflanzengeographie,
Berlin, Reimer, 1823.
Simberloff, D. S.: A Succession of Paradigms in Ecology, Essential-
ism to Materialism and Probabilism, Synthese, 42, 3–39, 1980.
Smuts, J. C.: Holism and Evolution, Macmillan, London, 1926.
Tansley, A. G.: The Classification of Vegetation and the Concept of
Development, J. Ecol., 8, 118–148, 1920.
Taylor, P. J.: Technocratic Optimism, H. T. Odum, and the Partial
Transformation of the Ecological Metaphor after World War II,
J. Hist. Biol., 21, 213–244, 1988.
Thurman, J.: Essai de Phytostatique Appliqué a la Chaine du Jura
et aus Contrées Voisines, Berne, 1849.
Tobey, R. C.: Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding
School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955, Berkeley, Uni-
versity of California Press, 1981.
Van der Maarel, E.: The Braun-Blanquet Approach in Perspective,
Vegetatio, 30, 213–219, 1975.
von Humboldt, A.: Flora Fribergensis Specimen, Berlin, 1793.
von Humboldt, A. and Bonpland, A.: Essai sur la Géographie des
Plantes, Schoelle, Paris, 1807.
von Humboldt, A. and Bonpland, A.: Essay on the Geography of
Plants, translated by: Romanowski, S., edited by: Jackson, S. T.,
Chicago, Chicago U.P., 2009.
von Post, H.: Försök till en Systematisk Uppställning af Vexställena
i Mellersta Sverige, Stockholm, 1862.
Warming, E.: Plantesamfund: Grundtraek af den Økologiske Plante-
geografi, Copenhagen, Philipsens, 1895.
Warming, E.: Oecology of Plants: An Introduction to the Study
of Plant Communities, Oxford, Oxford U.P., 1909, reprinted by
New York, Arno Press, 1977.
Weaver, J. E. and Clements, F. C.: Plant Ecology, 2nd Edn., New
York, McGraw-Hill, 1938.
White, G.: The Natural History and Antiquities of Selborne, Lon-
don, 1789.
Whittaker, R. H.: A Criticism of the Plant Association and Climatic
Climax Concepts, Northwest Sci., 25, 17–31, 1951.
Whittaker, R. H.: A Consideration of Climax Theory: The Climax
as Population and Pattern, Ecol. Monogr., 23, 41–78, 1953.
Whittaker, R. H.: Classification of Natural Communities, Bot. Rev.,
28, 1–239, 1962, reprinted by New York, Arno Press, 1977.
Willdenow, K. L.: Grundriss der Kräuterkunde, Berlin, 1792.
Willdenow, K. L.: The Principles of Botany, and of Vegetable Phys-
iology, Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1805.
Westman, W. E. and Peet, R. K.: Robert H. Whittaker (1920–1980):
The Man and His Work, Vegetatio, 48, 98–122, 1982.
Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013 www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/