Choosing the right medium for
municipal eParticipation based
  on stakeholder expectations




     Marius Rohde Johannessen, Leif S. Flak & Øystein Sæbø
                       Department of Information Systems
                               University of Agder, Norway
Outline

 • Whoare the stakeholders in eParticipation at the
  municipal level?


 • What are their communication needs and media
  preferences?


 • How can practitioners choose media for various
  types of communication?


                                                      2
Method

• Stakeholder   analysis


• Delphi   study of the various stakeholder groups


• survey   to stakeholders not in Delphi


•    Applied findings to prev. conceptual research to
    outline a media choice framework

                                                        3
Context: Case description

• Mid-sized   Norwegian municipality


• 8000    inhabitants, 390 sq. km

• Threelarge fjords have led to a scattered
 population, with about half living in the centre, and
 the rest spread out across the municipality.


• Highly   interested in technology and research

                                                         4
Who are the stakeholders?




                            5
What are their communication needs?

• Brainstorming   phase of Delphi provided 31 items


• Consolidationphase reduced these to ten items,
 grouped in three categories




                                                      6
What are their communication needs?




Communication needs by stakeholder group




                                           7
What are their communication needs?




Ranking of comunication needs, all stakeholder groups




                                                        8
Media preferences




• Municipal web site and E-mail most wanted media
• F2F meetings more popular than social media for debate
• But social media scores fairly high on dialogue categories
                                                               9
Towards a framework for media choice

• Combining
          genre analysis and analysis of available
 communication media


• Three   steps:
  •   Analyse communication genres
  •   Analyse available media
  •   Compare needs of genres with capabilities of medium




                                                            10
Towards a framework for media choice
• Genre   analysis




                                       11
Towards a framework for media choice

• Analysis   of medium




                                       12
Limitations & future research
 • Whilebased on Delphi, our findings are qualitative and
  interpretive, and within the contextual limitations of a
  small Norwegian municipality


 • Our   framework is based on theory and needs testing:
   •   verify the framework through testing it in government.
   •   validation of a common list of communication needs +
       appropriate technology to support each communication need




                                                                13
Thank you for listening!




                           marius.johannessen@uia.no
                                      leif.flak@uia.no
                                 Oystein.sabo@uia.no
                                                         14

Choosing the right medium for municipal eParticipation based on stakeholder expectations

  • 1.
    Choosing the rightmedium for municipal eParticipation based on stakeholder expectations Marius Rohde Johannessen, Leif S. Flak & Øystein Sæbø Department of Information Systems University of Agder, Norway
  • 2.
    Outline • Whoarethe stakeholders in eParticipation at the municipal level? • What are their communication needs and media preferences? • How can practitioners choose media for various types of communication? 2
  • 3.
    Method • Stakeholder analysis • Delphi study of the various stakeholder groups • survey to stakeholders not in Delphi • Applied findings to prev. conceptual research to outline a media choice framework 3
  • 4.
    Context: Case description •Mid-sized Norwegian municipality • 8000 inhabitants, 390 sq. km • Threelarge fjords have led to a scattered population, with about half living in the centre, and the rest spread out across the municipality. • Highly interested in technology and research 4
  • 5.
    Who are thestakeholders? 5
  • 6.
    What are theircommunication needs? • Brainstorming phase of Delphi provided 31 items • Consolidationphase reduced these to ten items, grouped in three categories 6
  • 7.
    What are theircommunication needs? Communication needs by stakeholder group 7
  • 8.
    What are theircommunication needs? Ranking of comunication needs, all stakeholder groups 8
  • 9.
    Media preferences • Municipalweb site and E-mail most wanted media • F2F meetings more popular than social media for debate • But social media scores fairly high on dialogue categories 9
  • 10.
    Towards a frameworkfor media choice • Combining genre analysis and analysis of available communication media • Three steps: • Analyse communication genres • Analyse available media • Compare needs of genres with capabilities of medium 10
  • 11.
    Towards a frameworkfor media choice • Genre analysis 11
  • 12.
    Towards a frameworkfor media choice • Analysis of medium 12
  • 13.
    Limitations & futureresearch • Whilebased on Delphi, our findings are qualitative and interpretive, and within the contextual limitations of a small Norwegian municipality • Our framework is based on theory and needs testing: • verify the framework through testing it in government. • validation of a common list of communication needs + appropriate technology to support each communication need 13
  • 14.
    Thank you forlistening! marius.johannessen@uia.no leif.flak@uia.no Oystein.sabo@uia.no 14