Chapter 3
Interpersonal Communication and the Self
1
Section 1
COMMUNICATION AND
THE SELF-CONCEPT
Interplay
2
Communication and the Self-Concept
Self-concept: relatively stable set of perceptions you hold of
yourself
Self-esteem: part of the self-concept that involves evaluations
of self-worth
How does high or low self-esteem affect communication
behavior?
All individuals hold a specific perception of themselves, and
one piece of such perceptions is feelings of self-worth. People
who feel good about themselves have positive expectations
about how they will communicate, and those feelings increase
the chances that communication will be successful (the same is
true for negative evaluations).
3
How the Self-Concept Develops
Reflected appraisal: A mirroring of the judgments of those
around you
Significant others: People whose evaluations are especially
influential
Social comparison: Evaluating ourselves in terms of how we
compare with others
Reference groups: People against whom we evaluate our own
characteristics
An individual’s self-concept develops over time, influenced by
supportive messages from others, especially those who are
particularly influential in our lives, and the way we compare
ourselves to other people.
4
Characteristics of the Self-Concept
The self-concept is subjective
We inflate and/or underestimate our self-perception
Why?
Obsolete information
Distorted feedback
The myth of perfection
Social expectations
Sometimes we view ourselves more harshly than others view us,
and sometimes we view ourselves more favorably than others
view us. This is related to the fact that sometimes we let our
past influence the way we view ourselves, we let overly critical
messages influences us the most, we try to be perfect, and we
live in a society that tends to reward those who actually
downplay their strengths.
5
Characteristics of the Self-Concept
A healthy self-concept is flexible
The self-concept resists change
Cognitive conservatism: Seeking information that conforms to
an existing self-concept
Human beings change overtime, and the self-concept can
change, too – but typically, it is difficult for such changes to
occur because we often try to confirm our existing self-concept
instead of allowing it to adjust.
6
The Self-Fulfilling
Prophecy and Communication
Self-fulfilling prophecy: When a person’s expectations of an
event and his or her behavior based on those expectations make
the outcome more likely to occur than would otherwise have
been the case.
Four stages:
Holding expectation (for yourself or for others)
Behaving in accordance with that expectation
The expectation coming to pass
Reinforcing the original expectation
Sometimes, the things we expect to happen influence our
behaviors to the point that those things we expect are even more
likely to occur because the belief is being reinforced.
7
Types of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Self-imposed prophecies
Your own expectations influence your behavior
Other-imposed prophecies
When one person’s expectations govern another’s actions,
whether positive or negative
Observer must communicate their belief for the prediction to
have an effect
Setting your own expectations can often influence your own
behaviors, and setting your expectations for others can also
influence their behaviors if those expectations are effectively
communicated.
8
Section 2
PRESENTING THE SELF
Interplay
9
Public and Private Selves
Perceived self: The person you believe yourself to be in
moments of honest self-reflection
Presenting self: Public image—the way we want to appear to
others
Facework: Verbal and nonverbal ways we act in order to
maintain our presenting image and the image of others
People tend to try to manage the impression they make on
others, which is based on how one perceives oneself (which may
or may not be accurate) and what one believes to be a socially
approved image; we use nonverbals and verbals to maintain face
with others.
10
Characteristics of Impression Management
We strive to construct multiple identities
Impression management is collaborative
We improvise scenes where our character reacts with others
Impression management can be deliberate or unconscious
Impression management involves attempting to use the
appropriate identity for a situation, which typically features
others who are also trying to manage the impression of others.
This process can be both intentional and unintentional.
11
Face-to-Face Impression Management
Manner
Words
Nonverbal actions
Appearance
Personal items people use to shape an image
Setting
Physical items we use to influence how others view us
In order to manage how people see us in face-to-face settings,
we use words and nonverbals, alter our physical appearance,
and use our surroundings to add to the impression.
12
Impression Management in
Social Media
The Internet offers an opportunity for people to present
themselves in a variety of ways
In mediated identity management, how do the factors of manner,
appearance, and setting change?
How do these changes make it easier or more difficult to
manage identity?
Social networking platforms provide opportunities to share or
withhold certain types of information in order to manage how
other people see them.
13
Impression Management and Honesty
People sometimes misrepresent themselves to gain the trust of
others
Deception in cyberspace is common
There is not only one honest way to behave in every
circumstance
Impression management involves deciding which face—which
part of yourself—to reveal
People have to make choices about how they will represent
themselves in every situation, and sometimes those choices can
be deceptive, which invites certain questions about when it is
okay to withhold certain details about oneself.
14
Section 3
DISCLOSING THE SELF
Interplay
15
Disclosing the Self
Self-disclosure: Information about the self that is purposefully
communicated to another person
Distinguishing factors of self-disclosure:
Honesty
Depth
Availability of information
Context of sharing
Self-disclosure is a process that features the self as the subject,
is intentional and directed at another person, is honest and
revealing, contains information generally unavailable from
others, and with its intimate nature often determined by context.
16
Models of Self-Disclosure
Degrees of Self-Disclosure: The Social Penetration Model
(Altman and Taylor)
Two dimensions:
Breadth of information shared
Depth of information shared
Development of a relationship is a progression from the
periphery of the model to its center
Types of information revealed:
Clichés—ritualized, stock responses
Facts
Opinions
Feelings
The Social Penetration Model provides a framework to represent
how people share information. The model represents the range
of information shared and how personal those messages are,
which influences the level of intimacy in the relationship.
17
Social Penetration Model
The Social Penetration Model represents the variety of topics to
be discussed and how personal those topics can get.
18
Johari Window Model
The Johari Window Model illustrates different areas that
represent things about you that are known to yourself and to
others. Whether or not you are willing to share that information
depends on whether that information is known to yourself and
others, not known to the self, not known to others, or not known
to any parties involved.
19
Benefits and Risks of Self-Disclosure
Benefits:
Catharsis
Self-clarification
Self-validation
Reciprocity
Impression formation
Relationship maintenance and enhancement
Moral obligation
Neither all-out disclosure nor complete privacy is ideal, but
there are obvious benefits to sharing information about oneself,
which include feeling better, clarifying beliefs or opinions,
confirming beliefs about yourself, others sharing with you,
making ourselves look more attractive, maintaining our
relationships or making them better, and because it might be
morally right to do so.
20
Benefits and Risks of Self-Disclosure
Risks:
Rejection
Negative impression
Decrease in relational satisfaction
Loss of influence
Loss of control
Hurt the other person
Opening up to others can involve risks, such as feeling rejected,
giving a negative impression, feeling less satisfied with a
relationship, loss of control of how others view you, or hurting
the person you’re sharing with.
21
Guidelines for Self Disclosure
Is the other person important to you?
Is the risk of disclosing reasonable?
Is the self-disclosure appropriate?
Is the disclosure reciprocated?
Will the effect be constructive?
In order to self-disclose effectively, it is important to consider
whether the person is someone you wish to grow closer with,
whether the benefits of disclosing outweigh the risks, whether it
is appropriate information to share, whether the other person
will self-disclose to you, and whether the disclosure will be
helpful.
22
Alternatives to Self-Disclosure
Silence
Lying
Benevolent lies—not malicious
Equivocation
Equivocal language: Two or more plausible meanings
Hinting
Seeks to get desired response from other person
If self-disclosure doesn’t seem to be appropriate, there are a few
things you can do. You might choose to keep your thoughts and
feelings to yourself, deliberately hide the truth, make statements
that avoid unpleasantness, or send a message that is direct while
still saving face.
23
The Ethics of Evasion
Provides a way to manage difficult situations
Times when honesty is the right approach, even when painful
Consider:
Are the effects of a lie worth the deception?
Is the indirect message in the interest of the receiver?
Is evasion the only way to behave?
How would others respond if they knew what you were really
thinking/feeling?
Sometimes it is most appropriate to be honest, and in those
cases it is useful to weigh the effects of telling a lie, whether
what you are saying is in the best interests of the receiver of the
message, if there is another option besides evasion, and how
people would respond if they knew what you were really
thinking.
24

Chapter 3Interpersonal Communication and the Self

  • 1.
    Chapter 3 Interpersonal Communicationand the Self 1 Section 1 COMMUNICATION AND THE SELF-CONCEPT Interplay 2 Communication and the Self-Concept Self-concept: relatively stable set of perceptions you hold of yourself Self-esteem: part of the self-concept that involves evaluations of self-worth How does high or low self-esteem affect communication behavior?
  • 2.
    All individuals holda specific perception of themselves, and one piece of such perceptions is feelings of self-worth. People who feel good about themselves have positive expectations about how they will communicate, and those feelings increase the chances that communication will be successful (the same is true for negative evaluations). 3 How the Self-Concept Develops Reflected appraisal: A mirroring of the judgments of those around you Significant others: People whose evaluations are especially influential Social comparison: Evaluating ourselves in terms of how we compare with others Reference groups: People against whom we evaluate our own characteristics An individual’s self-concept develops over time, influenced by supportive messages from others, especially those who are particularly influential in our lives, and the way we compare ourselves to other people. 4 Characteristics of the Self-Concept
  • 3.
    The self-concept issubjective We inflate and/or underestimate our self-perception Why? Obsolete information Distorted feedback The myth of perfection Social expectations Sometimes we view ourselves more harshly than others view us, and sometimes we view ourselves more favorably than others view us. This is related to the fact that sometimes we let our past influence the way we view ourselves, we let overly critical messages influences us the most, we try to be perfect, and we live in a society that tends to reward those who actually downplay their strengths. 5 Characteristics of the Self-Concept A healthy self-concept is flexible The self-concept resists change Cognitive conservatism: Seeking information that conforms to an existing self-concept Human beings change overtime, and the self-concept can
  • 4.
    change, too –but typically, it is difficult for such changes to occur because we often try to confirm our existing self-concept instead of allowing it to adjust. 6 The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and Communication Self-fulfilling prophecy: When a person’s expectations of an event and his or her behavior based on those expectations make the outcome more likely to occur than would otherwise have been the case. Four stages: Holding expectation (for yourself or for others) Behaving in accordance with that expectation The expectation coming to pass Reinforcing the original expectation Sometimes, the things we expect to happen influence our behaviors to the point that those things we expect are even more likely to occur because the belief is being reinforced. 7 Types of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies Self-imposed prophecies Your own expectations influence your behavior Other-imposed prophecies When one person’s expectations govern another’s actions, whether positive or negative Observer must communicate their belief for the prediction to have an effect
  • 5.
    Setting your ownexpectations can often influence your own behaviors, and setting your expectations for others can also influence their behaviors if those expectations are effectively communicated. 8 Section 2 PRESENTING THE SELF Interplay 9 Public and Private Selves Perceived self: The person you believe yourself to be in moments of honest self-reflection Presenting self: Public image—the way we want to appear to others Facework: Verbal and nonverbal ways we act in order to maintain our presenting image and the image of others People tend to try to manage the impression they make on
  • 6.
    others, which isbased on how one perceives oneself (which may or may not be accurate) and what one believes to be a socially approved image; we use nonverbals and verbals to maintain face with others. 10 Characteristics of Impression Management We strive to construct multiple identities Impression management is collaborative We improvise scenes where our character reacts with others Impression management can be deliberate or unconscious Impression management involves attempting to use the appropriate identity for a situation, which typically features others who are also trying to manage the impression of others. This process can be both intentional and unintentional. 11 Face-to-Face Impression Management Manner Words Nonverbal actions Appearance Personal items people use to shape an image Setting Physical items we use to influence how others view us
  • 7.
    In order tomanage how people see us in face-to-face settings, we use words and nonverbals, alter our physical appearance, and use our surroundings to add to the impression. 12 Impression Management in Social Media The Internet offers an opportunity for people to present themselves in a variety of ways In mediated identity management, how do the factors of manner, appearance, and setting change? How do these changes make it easier or more difficult to manage identity? Social networking platforms provide opportunities to share or withhold certain types of information in order to manage how other people see them. 13 Impression Management and Honesty People sometimes misrepresent themselves to gain the trust of others Deception in cyberspace is common There is not only one honest way to behave in every circumstance Impression management involves deciding which face—which part of yourself—to reveal
  • 8.
    People have tomake choices about how they will represent themselves in every situation, and sometimes those choices can be deceptive, which invites certain questions about when it is okay to withhold certain details about oneself. 14 Section 3 DISCLOSING THE SELF Interplay 15 Disclosing the Self Self-disclosure: Information about the self that is purposefully communicated to another person Distinguishing factors of self-disclosure: Honesty Depth Availability of information Context of sharing Self-disclosure is a process that features the self as the subject,
  • 9.
    is intentional anddirected at another person, is honest and revealing, contains information generally unavailable from others, and with its intimate nature often determined by context. 16 Models of Self-Disclosure Degrees of Self-Disclosure: The Social Penetration Model (Altman and Taylor) Two dimensions: Breadth of information shared Depth of information shared Development of a relationship is a progression from the periphery of the model to its center Types of information revealed: Clichés—ritualized, stock responses Facts Opinions Feelings The Social Penetration Model provides a framework to represent how people share information. The model represents the range of information shared and how personal those messages are, which influences the level of intimacy in the relationship. 17 Social Penetration Model
  • 10.
    The Social PenetrationModel represents the variety of topics to be discussed and how personal those topics can get. 18 Johari Window Model The Johari Window Model illustrates different areas that represent things about you that are known to yourself and to others. Whether or not you are willing to share that information depends on whether that information is known to yourself and others, not known to the self, not known to others, or not known to any parties involved. 19 Benefits and Risks of Self-Disclosure Benefits: Catharsis Self-clarification Self-validation Reciprocity Impression formation Relationship maintenance and enhancement Moral obligation Neither all-out disclosure nor complete privacy is ideal, but there are obvious benefits to sharing information about oneself, which include feeling better, clarifying beliefs or opinions,
  • 11.
    confirming beliefs aboutyourself, others sharing with you, making ourselves look more attractive, maintaining our relationships or making them better, and because it might be morally right to do so. 20 Benefits and Risks of Self-Disclosure Risks: Rejection Negative impression Decrease in relational satisfaction Loss of influence Loss of control Hurt the other person Opening up to others can involve risks, such as feeling rejected, giving a negative impression, feeling less satisfied with a relationship, loss of control of how others view you, or hurting the person you’re sharing with. 21 Guidelines for Self Disclosure Is the other person important to you? Is the risk of disclosing reasonable? Is the self-disclosure appropriate? Is the disclosure reciprocated? Will the effect be constructive?
  • 12.
    In order toself-disclose effectively, it is important to consider whether the person is someone you wish to grow closer with, whether the benefits of disclosing outweigh the risks, whether it is appropriate information to share, whether the other person will self-disclose to you, and whether the disclosure will be helpful. 22 Alternatives to Self-Disclosure Silence Lying Benevolent lies—not malicious Equivocation Equivocal language: Two or more plausible meanings Hinting Seeks to get desired response from other person If self-disclosure doesn’t seem to be appropriate, there are a few things you can do. You might choose to keep your thoughts and feelings to yourself, deliberately hide the truth, make statements that avoid unpleasantness, or send a message that is direct while still saving face. 23 The Ethics of Evasion Provides a way to manage difficult situations Times when honesty is the right approach, even when painful Consider:
  • 13.
    Are the effectsof a lie worth the deception? Is the indirect message in the interest of the receiver? Is evasion the only way to behave? How would others respond if they knew what you were really thinking/feeling? Sometimes it is most appropriate to be honest, and in those cases it is useful to weigh the effects of telling a lie, whether what you are saying is in the best interests of the receiver of the message, if there is another option besides evasion, and how people would respond if they knew what you were really thinking. 24