Dr. Malaka Munasinghe
Registrar in Anaesthesia
2015.09.17
Significance!!!
USA stats by 2010
-2 million visits to ETU
- 0.3 million admissions
- 55,000 deaths ( 30% of all injury related deaths)
- COST
76 BILLION DOLLARS
Current lines of Management
-supportive
- Focus on,
reducing secondary brain damage
- No effective definitive therapy
BUT - EMERGING
CELL BASED THERAPY
Pathophysioloy of TBI
Mechanism
-Direct impact
- Acceleration and deceleration/ rotational forces
- Primary phase
- Secondary phase
Primary phase
-immediate
- Massive neuronal depolarization
Release of neurotransmitters
- monocyte/macrophage mediated phagocytosis
- Complement mediated cytolysis
- Diffuse neuronal dysfunction
- disrupted blood brain barrier
- Expressed GLUT-1
- Synthesis and release of NO
cerebral vasodilatation
ICP
Worsen primary brain injury
Secondary phase
- Few hours after TBI
- Last several days
- Intracellular Ca2+ influx
- Free radical formation and lipid peroxidation
- Mitochondrial dysfunction
-Neuronal apoptosis ( focal and diffuse)
hippocampus- more vulnerable
- Upregulation of NGF/BDNF
- Downregulation of neutrophin-3 advantageous
BUT,
- NOT EFFECTIVE for Endogenous stem cell function
In repairing
AS,
Acute inflammatory enviorenment after TBI
( May last several weeks)
CELL BASED THERAPY FOR TBI
Cell types used
 Mesenchymal stem cells(MSC)
 Neural progenitor cells(NPC)
 Ntera 2(NT2) cells
 Embryonic stem cells
 Multipotent adult progenitor cells
 Endothelial progenitor cells
Mechanisms of action of cell based therapy
 Differentiaton in to locoregional cells
 Reduction of oedema and inflammation in TBI
 Secretion of chemokine and growth factors
 Enhancing neurogenesis,angiogenesis and
vasculogenesis
 Stabilizing damaged cells by gene and protein
transfer (fusion or intercellular contact)
 Enhancing migration of host neurogenic cells to the
area of TBI
Delivery of cells
 Intravenous
 Lateral ventricle
 Internal carotid artery
 Stereotactic method
Scaffolds used for cell delivery
 Fibrin
 Matrigel
 Collagen
 Gelatin
( provides an extracellular matrix
Maintain viability)
Timing of delivery of cells
 Just after the TBI to one week after
 No study analysing effectiveness in different timings
 BUT-
even with late administrations- improvement +
Assessment of improvement(ANIMAL MODELS)
 Motor function ; stepping or balance beam tests
 Learning ability ; morris walter maze test
 Reduction in cerebral lesion volume
- histology
- MRI/PET
 Reduced proinflammatory cytokines(IL1/6/TNF α)
CURRENT CLINICAL TRIALS
 Cox and colleagues- 2011
- prospective, non-random ,open label, phase 1/2
trial
- 1O chlidren aged 5-14 years with post resuscitation
GCS-58
- Autologus bone marrow derived cells
- administered 48 hrs later/followed up to 6 months
- three patients –complete recovery
Cox and colleagues- 2011 ctd…
BUT
ALL- SOME NEUROLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT!!!
-No post injury seizures
- No refractory intracranial pressure
-No new ischemic events
- No alteration in CPP
Tian and colleagues 2013…
- prospective, non-random ,open label, phase 1/2
trial
- 97 patients in subacute phase of TBI
- Intrathecal administration of autologus bone marrow
derived cells 02months after the injury
- Followed up for 40 days
- ¼-improved motor functions
- 11 out of 24 patients in vegetative state- improved
consciousness
Ongoing trials +++
One- to determine optimal route for delivery of cells
Concerns….
- Optimal route and timing yet to be deciced
- Stereotactic administration- invasive/need a
neurosurgeon
- Monitoring parameters to assess safety and efficacy
options - MRI to assess cerebral perfusion+ lesion
- concnt. of systemic pro and anti
inflammatory markers
- comprehensive neurological testing
- assessing functional recovery of
hippocampus
- gnerating,processing ,storage of stem/progenitor
cells- costly
- Difficulty in differentiating iatrogenic tumour foci
from inflamed tissue
Summary
- Traumatic brain injury is a major public health issue
- Cell based therapy would be a promising approach
- Animal and phase 1/2 human trials have shown
positive results
- Though, more studies are needed in understanding
the therapeutic mechanisms of stem cell therapy.
 References
-
THANK YOU….

Cell based therapy for traumatic brain injury

  • 1.
    Dr. Malaka Munasinghe Registrarin Anaesthesia 2015.09.17
  • 2.
    Significance!!! USA stats by2010 -2 million visits to ETU - 0.3 million admissions - 55,000 deaths ( 30% of all injury related deaths) - COST 76 BILLION DOLLARS
  • 3.
    Current lines ofManagement -supportive - Focus on, reducing secondary brain damage - No effective definitive therapy BUT - EMERGING CELL BASED THERAPY
  • 4.
    Pathophysioloy of TBI Mechanism -Directimpact - Acceleration and deceleration/ rotational forces - Primary phase - Secondary phase
  • 5.
    Primary phase -immediate - Massiveneuronal depolarization Release of neurotransmitters - monocyte/macrophage mediated phagocytosis - Complement mediated cytolysis - Diffuse neuronal dysfunction
  • 6.
    - disrupted bloodbrain barrier - Expressed GLUT-1 - Synthesis and release of NO cerebral vasodilatation ICP Worsen primary brain injury
  • 7.
    Secondary phase - Fewhours after TBI - Last several days - Intracellular Ca2+ influx - Free radical formation and lipid peroxidation - Mitochondrial dysfunction -Neuronal apoptosis ( focal and diffuse) hippocampus- more vulnerable
  • 8.
    - Upregulation ofNGF/BDNF - Downregulation of neutrophin-3 advantageous BUT, - NOT EFFECTIVE for Endogenous stem cell function In repairing AS, Acute inflammatory enviorenment after TBI ( May last several weeks)
  • 9.
    CELL BASED THERAPYFOR TBI Cell types used  Mesenchymal stem cells(MSC)  Neural progenitor cells(NPC)  Ntera 2(NT2) cells  Embryonic stem cells  Multipotent adult progenitor cells  Endothelial progenitor cells
  • 10.
    Mechanisms of actionof cell based therapy  Differentiaton in to locoregional cells  Reduction of oedema and inflammation in TBI  Secretion of chemokine and growth factors  Enhancing neurogenesis,angiogenesis and vasculogenesis  Stabilizing damaged cells by gene and protein transfer (fusion or intercellular contact)  Enhancing migration of host neurogenic cells to the area of TBI
  • 11.
    Delivery of cells Intravenous  Lateral ventricle  Internal carotid artery  Stereotactic method
  • 12.
    Scaffolds used forcell delivery  Fibrin  Matrigel  Collagen  Gelatin ( provides an extracellular matrix Maintain viability)
  • 13.
    Timing of deliveryof cells  Just after the TBI to one week after  No study analysing effectiveness in different timings  BUT- even with late administrations- improvement +
  • 14.
    Assessment of improvement(ANIMALMODELS)  Motor function ; stepping or balance beam tests  Learning ability ; morris walter maze test  Reduction in cerebral lesion volume - histology - MRI/PET  Reduced proinflammatory cytokines(IL1/6/TNF α)
  • 15.
    CURRENT CLINICAL TRIALS Cox and colleagues- 2011 - prospective, non-random ,open label, phase 1/2 trial - 1O chlidren aged 5-14 years with post resuscitation GCS-58 - Autologus bone marrow derived cells - administered 48 hrs later/followed up to 6 months - three patients –complete recovery
  • 16.
    Cox and colleagues-2011 ctd… BUT ALL- SOME NEUROLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT!!! -No post injury seizures - No refractory intracranial pressure -No new ischemic events - No alteration in CPP
  • 17.
    Tian and colleagues2013… - prospective, non-random ,open label, phase 1/2 trial - 97 patients in subacute phase of TBI - Intrathecal administration of autologus bone marrow derived cells 02months after the injury - Followed up for 40 days - ¼-improved motor functions - 11 out of 24 patients in vegetative state- improved consciousness
  • 18.
    Ongoing trials +++ One-to determine optimal route for delivery of cells
  • 19.
    Concerns…. - Optimal routeand timing yet to be deciced - Stereotactic administration- invasive/need a neurosurgeon - Monitoring parameters to assess safety and efficacy options - MRI to assess cerebral perfusion+ lesion - concnt. of systemic pro and anti inflammatory markers - comprehensive neurological testing - assessing functional recovery of hippocampus
  • 20.
    - gnerating,processing ,storageof stem/progenitor cells- costly - Difficulty in differentiating iatrogenic tumour foci from inflamed tissue
  • 21.
    Summary - Traumatic braininjury is a major public health issue - Cell based therapy would be a promising approach - Animal and phase 1/2 human trials have shown positive results - Though, more studies are needed in understanding the therapeutic mechanisms of stem cell therapy.
  • 22.
  • 23.