The document discusses the increasing emphasis on strategic planning by local authorities in the UK. It outlines the government's push for more joint strategic plans developed across local authority boundaries to coordinate infrastructure, housing, and growth. Several initiatives and policies are highlighted that encourage or require greater cooperation between authorities, including strengthened requirements in the Duty to Cooperate, joint infrastructure funding opportunities, and new powers for the Secretary of State to direct joint plan-making. The first new joint strategic plans are being prepared, with the West of England plan being the first to undergo examination. Overall the trend is toward more integrated strategic planning at a regional scale.
A presentation from the Planning Advisory Service's Duty to Cooperate event by Karl Roberts, Assistant Director Planning & Economic Regeneration, Arun District Council
At our June planning club we covered the following topics:
- air quality and the implications for planning
- viability assessment in relation to S106 agreements
- an update on the NPPF.
To view further information and training visit our website - https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/sectors/public-sector
Plan making - getting your plan in place (July 2013) PAS_Team
This presentation is for councillors leading the production of the local plan. It looks at the main aspects of the plan-making process, sets out the key plan-making principles and steps that authorities need to take in order to get a robust plan in place. The material can be delivered by a council officer or by PAS at your authority and can be tailored to be delivered over a whole day, half day or evening.
Выступление Алистера Бланта (Варшава, Польша) в ходе панельной дискуссии "Комплексный подход к планированию пространственного и
экономического развития городов" на Форуме Городов 2017 (Бишкек, Кыргызстан). Версия на английском языке
2010 Can LEPs fill the strategic void? - pugalis and townsendLee Pugalis
For the first time since 1947, England is without a recognised strategic planning framework following the revocation of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSSs). Articles in the June and July/August issues of this journal have variously criticised the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government for opening up a ‘NIMBY charter’ and inviting ‘chaos’ through an ‘act now, think later’ policy approach of ‘rampaging through the English planning system’. By removing the layer of strategic planning in one fell swoop, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has left the planning fraternity to muddle through the mess. It is not our intent to retrace these arguments here. Instead we look, through a pragmatic lens, at the Coalition’s new policy innovation – the Local Enterprise Partnership – and consider how far this may go to filling the strategic void. We argue that there is a strong case for ‘the suggestion that Local Enterprise Partnerships may fulfil a planning function’, as currently being examined by the Communities and Local Government Committee (CLG) Inquiry into the Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies. However, as we sketch out a role for planning in the Government’s economic transition plan, we draw attention to several potential pitfalls along the way.
A presentation from the Planning Advisory Service's Duty to Cooperate event by Karl Roberts, Assistant Director Planning & Economic Regeneration, Arun District Council
At our June planning club we covered the following topics:
- air quality and the implications for planning
- viability assessment in relation to S106 agreements
- an update on the NPPF.
To view further information and training visit our website - https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/sectors/public-sector
Plan making - getting your plan in place (July 2013) PAS_Team
This presentation is for councillors leading the production of the local plan. It looks at the main aspects of the plan-making process, sets out the key plan-making principles and steps that authorities need to take in order to get a robust plan in place. The material can be delivered by a council officer or by PAS at your authority and can be tailored to be delivered over a whole day, half day or evening.
Выступление Алистера Бланта (Варшава, Польша) в ходе панельной дискуссии "Комплексный подход к планированию пространственного и
экономического развития городов" на Форуме Городов 2017 (Бишкек, Кыргызстан). Версия на английском языке
2010 Can LEPs fill the strategic void? - pugalis and townsendLee Pugalis
For the first time since 1947, England is without a recognised strategic planning framework following the revocation of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSSs). Articles in the June and July/August issues of this journal have variously criticised the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government for opening up a ‘NIMBY charter’ and inviting ‘chaos’ through an ‘act now, think later’ policy approach of ‘rampaging through the English planning system’. By removing the layer of strategic planning in one fell swoop, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has left the planning fraternity to muddle through the mess. It is not our intent to retrace these arguments here. Instead we look, through a pragmatic lens, at the Coalition’s new policy innovation – the Local Enterprise Partnership – and consider how far this may go to filling the strategic void. We argue that there is a strong case for ‘the suggestion that Local Enterprise Partnerships may fulfil a planning function’, as currently being examined by the Communities and Local Government Committee (CLG) Inquiry into the Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies. However, as we sketch out a role for planning in the Government’s economic transition plan, we draw attention to several potential pitfalls along the way.
OECD - Fiscal Network Work Programme (Item5)OECDtax
Presentation delivered during the 13th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, 23-24 November 2017, Paris, France.
The making of responsive innovation policies: varieties of evidence and their...Orkestra
Article by Edurne Magro and Alexander Kleibrink about the making of responsive innovation policies published by Palgrave Communications on June of 2018. Includes evidence in the Basque Country.
The impacts of strategic spatial planning on land change in European urban r...Private
From plans to land change: how strategic spatial planning contributes to the development of urban regions (CONCUR) http://www.wsl.ch/fe/landschaftsdynamik/projekte/CONCUR/index_EN
Oliveira & Hersperger (2016)
Challenges and opportunities created by globalization for subnational governm...OECDtax
Presentation delivered during the 13th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, 23-24 November 2017, Paris, France.
2008 a framework for regeneration more questions than answers - pugalisLee Pugalis
A recent consultation report from the Department of Communities and Local Government which goes by the rhetorical title of, Transforming places; changing lives A framework for regeneration, goes some way to laying the groundwork for proposals first set out in the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration (SNR). The framework proclaims to set out ‘an ambitious package of proposals – for consultation – that aim to shape the way that regeneration is carried out in future in England’. Yet upon reading the report’s 159 pages one is left with a strange feeling of déjà vu. This is followed by a suspicion that much of what Government are suggesting is already a done deal; with many economic development officers and policy-makers already busy working on the package of proposals. I shall briefly summarise the key measures of the framework before questioning the timing of this consultation in light of the determination of regional funding allocations.
Pugalis, L. (2008) 'A framework for regeneration: more questions than answers', The Journal of the Institution of Economic Development, (106), pp. 7.
So you want to apply for the Planning Skills Delivery Fund PAS Events August ...PAS_Team
So you want to apply for the Planning Skills Delivery Fund?
The Planning Skills Delivery Fund (PSDF) will provide £24 million over two years to local authorities to help with clearing backlogs of planning applications and prepare for the implementation of proposed planning reform. It's part of a wider programme of work designed to address the capability and capacity of planning services. Local planning authorities can apply for funding for up to £100,000, which can be used to hire additional planning officers and other specialist resources.
Planning Advisory Service recently held two events to help councils think about whether to apply and if they needed to find time over the Summer to make an application. Here is the presentation with all you need to know about the fund.
Presentation from Dan Knowles, Planning Policy Officer at Guildford Borough Council on their approach to adopted 20% biodiversity net gain in their Local Plan
Infrastructure Levy Technical Consultation (Workshop 2 Spending the levy and ...PAS_Team
Infrastructure Levy Technical Consultation (Workshop 2 Spending the levy and delivering infrastructure) - A copy of the presentation given by DLUHC at a PAS workshop
PAS Natural England Biodiversity Net Gain update 18_04_23PAS_Team
Nick White, Principal Adviser - Net Gain from Natural England provided an update on the latest on Biodiversity Net Gain to an audience of over 500 on 18 April 2023.
Up the Ratios Bylaws - a Comprehensive Process of Our Organizationuptheratios
Up the Ratios is a non-profit organization dedicated to bridging the gap in STEM education for underprivileged students by providing free, high-quality learning opportunities in robotics and other STEM fields. Our mission is to empower the next generation of innovators, thinkers, and problem-solvers by offering a range of educational programs that foster curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
At Up the Ratios, we believe that every student, regardless of their socio-economic background, should have access to the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in today's technology-driven world. To achieve this, we host a variety of free classes, workshops, summer camps, and live lectures tailored to students from underserved communities. Our programs are designed to be engaging and hands-on, allowing students to explore the exciting world of robotics and STEM through practical, real-world applications.
Our free classes cover fundamental concepts in robotics, coding, and engineering, providing students with a strong foundation in these critical areas. Through our interactive workshops, students can dive deeper into specific topics, working on projects that challenge them to apply what they've learned and think creatively. Our summer camps offer an immersive experience where students can collaborate on larger projects, develop their teamwork skills, and gain confidence in their abilities.
In addition to our local programs, Up the Ratios is committed to making a global impact. We take donations of new and gently used robotics parts, which we then distribute to students and educational institutions in other countries. These donations help ensure that young learners worldwide have the resources they need to explore and excel in STEM fields. By supporting education in this way, we aim to nurture a global community of future leaders and innovators.
Our live lectures feature guest speakers from various STEM disciplines, including engineers, scientists, and industry professionals who share their knowledge and experiences with our students. These lectures provide valuable insights into potential career paths and inspire students to pursue their passions in STEM.
Up the Ratios relies on the generosity of donors and volunteers to continue our work. Contributions of time, expertise, and financial support are crucial to sustaining our programs and expanding our reach. Whether you're an individual passionate about education, a professional in the STEM field, or a company looking to give back to the community, there are many ways to get involved and make a difference.
We are proud of the positive impact we've had on the lives of countless students, many of whom have gone on to pursue higher education and careers in STEM. By providing these young minds with the tools and opportunities they need to succeed, we are not only changing their futures but also contributing to the advancement of technology and innovation on a broader scale.
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Canadian Immigration Tracker March 2024 - Key SlidesAndrew Griffith
Highlights
Permanent Residents decrease along with percentage of TR2PR decline to 52 percent of all Permanent Residents.
March asylum claim data not issued as of May 27 (unusually late). Irregular arrivals remain very small.
Study permit applications experiencing sharp decrease as a result of announced caps over 50 percent compared to February.
Citizenship numbers remain stable.
Slide 3 has the overall numbers and change.
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Catriona riddell strategic planning 1st & 7th & 14th
1. The New World of Joint Strategic Plans
Catriona Riddell
PAS Strategic Planning Workshop
February 2019
2. Government Technical Consultation highlights “the advantages of strong strategic plan-making across local planning
authority boundaries, in particular in addressing housing need across housing market areas” . Local Plan Expert Group
identifies challenges around strategic planning as key barrier to local plan preparation and growth and recommends changes to
provide ‘more teeth’ to the Duty to Cooperate, most of which have subsequently been taken forward by Government
Government set out initial proposals for planning reform in Housing White Paper - new ‘strategic’ local plan option preferably
with “…more and more local authorities working together to produce a strategic plan over a wider area on the functional
economic geography that is right for their part of the world...”; more robust approach to be introduced to Duty to Cooperate
through mandatory ‘statements of common ground’ (to include county councils) and new examination ‘tests of soundness’.
Further details set out in the later Right Homes in Right Places consultation.
Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 provides statutory requirement to set out ‘strategic priorities’ through planning ‘portfolio’,
more LP intervention powers and new powers to allow the Secretary of State to direct the preparation of a joint local plan where
this would “facilitate the more effective planning of the development and use of land in the area”.
Joint working over strategic areas key criterion on Government decisions on Housing Infrastructure Fund and Planning Delivery
Fund aimed at supporting “greater collaboration between councils, a more strategic approach to planning, housing and
infrastructure…”
SoS LP intervention process initiated for first 15 LPAs- SoS decisions to be “informed by the wider planning context in each
area (specifically the extent to which authorities are working cooperatively to put strategic plans in place)”.
Need for more effective strategic and infrastructure planning emphasised in wider Government announcements with Budget
2017 endorsing Cam-MK-Ox Corridor and proposals for new ‘strategic infrastructure tariff’ (SIT) and 5 new towns in South East;
and Industrial Strategy White Paper emphasising support for “greater collaboration between councils, a more strategic
approach to planning housing and infrastructure…”
First new style Joint Strategic Plan submitted for examination (West of England) with four others being prepared. Other LAs
considering a move to the new strategic plans on joint basis.
Revised NPPF published July 2018 confirming support for joint plans and development plan ‘portfolio’
In September, Kit Malthouse emphasises the importance of strategic planning in government funding decisions
The journey back to effective strategic planning
2016
2017
2018
3. Strategic planning 2019
"Our general thrust is for groups of
local authorities to come together
to form a kind of strategic
partnership and vision for a
particular region or area,
fundamentally so that we can fund
the infrastructure that's related to
it.”
"We are unable to put the
infrastructure that's required
through the [Housing
Infrastructure Fund] against
proposals unless they have that
kind of pan-regional or cross-area
coordination."
Kit Malthouse, Minister for Housing, September 2018
4. Overall Government priority:
increase housing delivery to 300k
per annum
Quicker and more effective plan-making
More effective
strategic planning
• New local plan ‘portfolio’ approach introduced with
emphasis on joint planning
• Duty to Cooperate strengthened through Statement of
Common Ground and new tests of soundness to
ensure DtC is ‘duty to agree’- Strategic policies to be
“informed by agreements with other authorities” and
“based on effective joint working on cross-boundary
strategic matters that have been dealt with rather than
deferred, as evidenced by the statement of common
ground”.
• Strategic Infrastructure Tariff to be introduced - but can
only be levied by combined authorities or through
statutory joint local plan committee (as currently
proposed).
• Increasing number of housing and growth deals with
more effective joint planning a key part.
• Fiscal incentives offered for more effective strategic
planning through government infrastructure & capacity
funding.
• Strategic planning key factor in government agency
priorities e.g. Highways/ Homes England.
• Strategic approach to transport beginning to emerge
through Sub-national transport bodies
• Strong influence beginning to emerge from Local
Industrial Strategies that will set out 20 year strategies,
including some spatial priorities
• National spatial priorities begin to emerge from
Government e.g. CAMKOX Corridor, Thames Estuary,
Northern Powerhouse, new towns (in South East)
Speed up delivery
of local plans
(e.g. intervention, use of
planning ‘freedoms &
flexibilities’, HDT, standard
methodology)
Strategic planning 2019
6. Five groups of authorities preparing new
style Joint Strategic Plans: Greater
Exeter, Oxfordshire, South Essex, South
West Herts, West of England
Long term strategic investment
strategies with statutory status being
prepared within wider growth
ambitions.
All are changing the spatial strategy over
the long term (in most cases to 2050)
All are S28 joint plans but with no joint
decision-making (S29 committee)
therefore decisions are made by
individual LPAs. In two-tier areas county
councils are part of governance but have
no decision-making responsibility.
Joint Strategic Plans 2019
7. A more coordinated and focused approach to investment and supporting growth, with priority given to
strategic solutions, for example, transport growth corridors and new communities
Considered to be only way of getting over very high Duty to Cooperate hurdle provided by Government’s new
approach to strategic planning.
To provide more opportunities - bigger spatial canvas- for effective place-shaping and deliver sound and legally
compliant planning frameworks – many areas facing significantly increased challenges around housing
provision since 2012 therefore different spatial options now needed (some prompted by DtC failures).
A move back to ‘place’ and away from ‘planning by numbers’, recognising that long term spatial priorities
must be fully aligned with infrastructure, economic priorities (and other priorities e.g. health, environment).
Opportunities to maximise investment and funding across sub-regional areas (follow the money) – e.g.
through government devolution and growth deals, government infrastructure and capacity funding bids, and
making more effective/ efficient use of local infrastructure funding through pooling. Clear winners where
statutory joint plans being prepared.
Challenges around the long term sustainable growth of cities, particularly where the administrative
boundaries are tightly bound and there is a need to rely on the support of neighbouring areas.
Delivery of immediate and potentially significant cost savings as a result of a combined plan-making process
(e.g. examinations; public consultation and stakeholder engagement; evidence-base) and a more efficient and
effective use of staff resources and expertise.
The incentives for Joint strategic plans
8. The Planning ‘Portfolio’ 2018
(Managed through a Statement of Common Ground / MoU)
Joint Strategic Plan
• High level planning framework for local policies with
small number of strategic policies.
• Will address critical Duty to Cooperate issues including
overall housing target & distribution and strategic
infrastructure
• Do not have to include site allocations provided it can
be demonstrated that these are to be dealt with
through other mechanisms such as brownfield registers
or non-strategic policies
• Must be based on a shared vision / ambition
Local Policies/ plans
(Not a requirement)
• More flexible approach to planning tools focusing on
managing change on the ground
• Do not need to be full site allocations plans
• E.g. Site allocation documents (where needed beyond
Brownfield Register), (joint) area action plans,
neighbourhood plans
• Brownfield Register(s)
• Local Industrial Strategy
• Strategic infrastructure
priorities
Statutory Development Plan
Minerals & Waste
Plans
Where not included in Strategic
Plan
NPPF
Joint Strategic Plans 2019
9. Sub-national Transport Bodies/
Local Enterprise Partnerships/
Local Nature Partnerships
County/ CA/ Sub-regional level
growth & infrastructure
frameworks
Joint Strategic Plans
Local
Plans
Joint Strategic Plans: Ensuring integration
Vertical alignment across wider
strategic geographies is just as
important as horizontal alignment
across local planning areas.
National priorities e.g.
NPPF
Industrial Strategy,
25 Year Environment Plan,
Homes England,
Highways England,
National Rail
National Infrastructure Plan
"To create new homes and places for
people to live, infrastructure such as
transport, healthcare, schools and
utilities must be in place, but this is
difficult as government departments
are not required to tie their
investment strategies with local
authorities’ infrastructure plans,
creating uncertainty about how
some infrastructure will be funded.”
National Audit Office, February 2019
10. • In 2013 recognition that ‘effective strategic planning
mechanism’ was joint plan
• 4 LPAs (all UAs) working within ‘voluntary’
governance arrangements - final decision-making
remains with individual LAs
• Strategic focus & planning scope – only 7 policies,
key diagram with no site allocations
• Sets general extent of Green Belt and identifies
areas where detailed boundary need to be
reviewed to accommodate strategic growth.
• Supported by more detailed DPDs prepared in
parallel (but one stage behind to reflect JSP)
• Joint transport strategy prepared alongside JSP
• Will be first to be tested at Examination (Hearings
due to start in May 2019).
• First phase housing deal agreed with Government
to secure delivery of infrastructure and strategic site
& includes £3m to establish strategic delivery team.
West of England Joint Spatial Plan
https://www.jointplanningwofe.org.uk/consult.ti
11. • Oxfordshire Authorities (5 districts and 1 county) have been
working closely for a number of years to manage strategic
infrastructure investment and the growth of Oxford City.
• Oxfordshire Growth Board (formal joint committee) established
to facilitate joint working on economic development, strategic
planning and growth. Board also includes strategic stakeholders
as co-opted, non-voting members.
• Board oversees the delivery of projects that the councils of
Oxfordshire are seeking to deliver collaboratively, such as the
growth deals agreed with Government.
• Oxfordshire is part of the NIC’s Cambridge-Milton Keynes- Oxford
growth corridor which aims to provide 1m new homes by 2050.
• Joint work started with SHMA and strategic infrastructure
framework – small steps
• Strategic collaboration paying dividends with recent growth deal
agreed to secure 100k new homes (to 2031) with £230m for first
5 years to support infrastructure and affordable housing delivery.
• Joint strategic plan agreed as part of the deal, including ‘planning
freedoms and flexibilities’ & £5m capacity funding.
• First stage (pre-Reg 18) consultation document just published
highlighting significant issues that will need to be addressed
through plan process.
Oxfordshire Joint Strategic Spatial Plan
https://oxfordshireplan.org/
12. South Essex Joint Strategic Plan
https://www.castlepoint.gov.uk/news/south-essex-
councils-set-out-vision-for-regions-growth-2015/
• Significant challenges across the area (high proportion of GB, high
housing need, poor delivery – former growth area)
• Catalysts for joint working – DtC failure of Castle Point in 2017 &
recognition that need to be in control of own destiny.
• 4 districts, 2 UAs and 1 county council involved in joint
arrangements with decisions made by individual LPAs
• All work done on ‘South Essex’ basis with no LA boundaries.
• JSP being developed within wider ‘South Essex 2050’ place ambition
developed by Leaders (supported by EELGA) through Association of
South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) - 3 main workstreams being
implemented covering strategic planning (joint plan), infrastructure
and local industrial strategy.
• New governance structures & working arrangements being
implemented, including shared office.
• Successful bid to Government’s PDF - £900k
• Current challenges around SoS intervention impacting on 3 LPs,
transition management & Thames Estuary Commission suggesting
significant increase in housing delivery over current target of 90k for
next 20 years.
• Strategic planning coverage for all Essex now beginning to emerge
but different approaches being adopted (e.g. North Essex Aligned
Strategy).
13. • There is no rule book yet –this is new to everyone. Learning from each other but many issues to be tested
through WoE plan in May.
• The purpose of JSPs is different from traditional local plans - JSPs should be considered as long term strategic
investment plans steering growth which is delivered over 10, 20 and 30 year periods, with clear and focused
scope on critical issues that will support growth. But there are challenges around the fact that they are also
statutory plans and therefore have to be legally and policy compliant.
• JSP should set out a clear narrative around ‘place’ – it is not all about housing numbers.
• Partnership working is always challenging but strategic planners have key ringmaster role to play within
clear governance structures. Leadership will need to be robust to drive the JSP through politically challenging
process, especially where changing politics as result of elections. Governance structures therefore need to be
robust.
• Stakeholder engagement and communications strategy is critical - ALL councillors need to be on board with
JSP and understand what it is (and what it isn’t i.e. a local plan) before being asked to make decisions. Also
important to have buy-in from key stakeholders especially if they are to play a role in delivery, and local MPs.
Regular and consistent briefings needed.
• LEPs and Sub-national Transport Bodies will be key players in delivery – Major funding streams will be
delivered through these bodies therefore priorities need to be aligned. Local Industrial Strategies will have a
clear narrative around what the industrial / sector priorities are and how (and where) these will be delivered
over 20 years.
• More creative and innovative funding solutions need to be developed with interventions needed to deliver
overall strategy clearly identified. Also need to be clear about the critical path to delivery and what
stakeholders are essential to this e.g. Highways England.
Joint Strategic Plans - some lessons so far
14. • JSPs are integral to local planning and need to be treated as part of the day job by all involved and right level
of officers involved to make decisions about priorities and resources. Process is proving useful in terms of
addressing skills/ capacity issues.
• Managing the transition is challenging where LPs are not in same place - particularly where some LPs
progressing faster than JSP (or are subject to intervention). Need to have clear phasing periods which LPs can
reflect with more certainty in first 5-10 yrs and more flexibility in longer term to deliver JSP spatial strategy
(which is likely to be very different).
• There needs to be flexibility in the timetables to reflect changes as the plans are prepared – most
partnerships include more than 5 LAs with most having annual elections and potential political changes. This
needs to be factored in to any potential approaches to Government for a growth deal.
• There is no perfect strategic geography – often more than one HMA included. JSP cover larger area that earlier
joint plans, some on whole county basis. Larger scale provides more strategic approach but more than 5-6
LPAs involved will add (potentially significant) time to preparation process due to individual decision-making
needed.
• Budget & Resources – Although JSPs will provide significant efficiency savings e.g. through shared evidence
base, overall budget will be approximately £2-3m, PDF award has been essential. Other savings though
through joint working/ sharing knowledge and skills. long term investment needed both in terms of finance
and staffing. Need to rebuild capacity in strategic planning and in delivery skills and expertise
• Keeping things strategic – Scope! Scope! Scope! JSPs are focused plans with a small number of strategic
policies and generally no site allocations – maintaining a strategic approach has been challenging especially
keeping the evidence base focused. No allocations approach will be tested in WoE examination.
Joint Strategic Plans - some lessons so far