- The survey was sent to parents of students at Cassidy Elementary in April 2013 to gather feedback on parent satisfaction. 209 parents responded, representing 284 students.
- Parents were highly satisfied overall with Cassidy, its teachers and staff, curriculum, and communication. Areas needing most improvement included opportunities for physical activity, cafeteria food quality, and emphasis on standardized testing.
- Satisfaction levels varied by grade, with highest satisfaction in kindergarten and lowest in 4th grade. Parent comments provided additional feedback on specific teachers, subjects like Spanish, discipline issues, and academic challenges or lack thereof for some students.
Race Brook School Annual Report 2013 2014Lynn McMullin
The first 10 slides of this presentation are from a student presentation on PBIS given on December 9, 2013. The slides which follow are Principal Mike Gray's Annual Report also given the same night.
Race Brook School Annual Report 2013 2014Lynn McMullin
The first 10 slides of this presentation are from a student presentation on PBIS given on December 9, 2013. The slides which follow are Principal Mike Gray's Annual Report also given the same night.
Parent Teacher Conferences: What's new, fresh ideas and best practices from education thought leaders and technology specialists. Sponsored by McGraw-Hill Education and VolunteerSpot, the leading FREE, easy online parent-teacher conference scheduling tool.
Aim of opening session to a school or college is
To usher or initiate the first year students into the school /college community and
Introduce them formally to life and activities that exist within this small society, a microcosm in a macrocosm.
This equips them with the requisite knowledge they need
For a successful stay and
To be able to achieve their goal or target in view.
The aim of any academic institution curriculum expects nothing but excellent academic performance of students who come out of the education programmes
This excellence prepares them to fill vacancy created by the old, weak and weary adult citizens, functioning to the expectation of society. Questions thus arise areWhat exactly academic excellence is?
Who should contributes to manifest it?
What one does to ensure academic excellence?
What benefits an academic excellent person derives?
What challenges are involved in the quest to achieving this academic excellence?
Henderson International School hosted a Ramp-Up for current 5th grade Families to highlight the values of a PS-8 program and to discuss our middle school program.
Presentation given to Year 7 Parents on 3rd September at Countesthorpe Leysland Community College with useful tips and advice on how best to support your child.
Parent Teacher Conferences: What's new, fresh ideas and best practices from education thought leaders and technology specialists. Sponsored by McGraw-Hill Education and VolunteerSpot, the leading FREE, easy online parent-teacher conference scheduling tool.
Aim of opening session to a school or college is
To usher or initiate the first year students into the school /college community and
Introduce them formally to life and activities that exist within this small society, a microcosm in a macrocosm.
This equips them with the requisite knowledge they need
For a successful stay and
To be able to achieve their goal or target in view.
The aim of any academic institution curriculum expects nothing but excellent academic performance of students who come out of the education programmes
This excellence prepares them to fill vacancy created by the old, weak and weary adult citizens, functioning to the expectation of society. Questions thus arise areWhat exactly academic excellence is?
Who should contributes to manifest it?
What one does to ensure academic excellence?
What benefits an academic excellent person derives?
What challenges are involved in the quest to achieving this academic excellence?
Henderson International School hosted a Ramp-Up for current 5th grade Families to highlight the values of a PS-8 program and to discuss our middle school program.
Presentation given to Year 7 Parents on 3rd September at Countesthorpe Leysland Community College with useful tips and advice on how best to support your child.
A Road MAP to Success: Strategies to Transform Students’ Mathematical PathNWEA
A Road MAP to Success: Strategies to Transform Students’ Mathematical Path
Jeff Ridlehoover, Associate Principal, Kristen Addonizio, Teacher, Nicole Jockisch, Research & Assessment, Wayzata Public Schools, MN
Fusion 2012, the NWEA summer conference in Portland, Oregon
This session will describe the use of MAP data to identify struggling 9th grade math learners as well as track their growth after intensive and innovative intervention. We will discuss the process of setting up this intervention class as well as the structure and practices used in our classroom. We will provide examples of practices to incorporate into any existing class as well as make a case to include a more intensive intervention option within your school. Administrators and teachers interested in making significant progress for all learners, as measured by NWEA’s MAP test, should attend.
Learning Outcome:
- How to use data to measure progress in a high school math classroom
- How to positively impact student achievement within an existing school structure
- How to use data to identify the right students in need of intervention
Audience:
-District leadership
- Curriculum and Instruction
Wayzata School District #284 is a suburban district in Minnesota that has been administering MAP for 10 years at the elementary and middle school level. We first started using the MAP tests at the high school three years ago. We use the philosophy of Madeline Hunter to guide our instructional planning and have recently placed a district-wide emphasis on the creation and implementation of Professional Learning Communities. Our team includes a high school associate principal and two high school math teachers.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
1. Cassidy Elementary
SBDM Parent Satisfaction Survey
2012-2013
SBDM Survey Committee:
Lisa Zent, Jennifer Alexander,
Tricia Mitcham & Meredith Wells Lepley
Report prepared by Meredith Wells Lepley, Ph.D.
with support from
UK’s Institute for Workplace Innovation
May 2013
2. Procedure
• SBDM Survey Committee began reviewing last year’s
survey and editing questions in December 2012
• Cassidy principal and teachers were asked for input
on survey questions
• Final survey approved by principal in March 2013
• Survey sent to all Cassidy parents in the manner in
which they receive Tuesday folders (electronically or
on paper) in April 2013
2
3. Response Rate
• 209 surveys were completed representing 284
of the 672 Cassidy students
• Response rate of 42%
3
4. Parent Participants
• 80% female vs. 20% male
• 88% White, 6% Asian, 2% Black, < 1% Hispanic/
Latino, < 1% Native American, 3% Other
• 10% have children on free & reduced lunch
• Most (66%) have had children at Cassidy 0-3 years
4
9. Comments
Spanish
• Widespread dissatisfaction with this special & curriculum
• Class not as effective as it was under previous teacher and format
• low level work, parents expect more
• Infrequent classes make immersion difficult
Art
• Need more variety in curriculum. Same projects every year
• Grading too subjective
• No progression in skills
P.E.
• Need more movement, more physical activity
• Activities always the same, no variety
9
10. Extra-curricular Activities
• More physical activity
• DRUM to include girls
• Track/Archery
• Yoga
• French
• Chinese
• Arts and Crafts
• Any athletic team
• Self defense
10
• Chess
• Dance
• Morning clubs
• Acting/stage
• Golf
• Music
• Tennis
• Lego Robotics Team
Parents suggest the following:
11. Communication
Parents of children in all grade levels prefer to
communicate with teacher via:
1. email
2. meetings
3. phone or teacher newsletters
11
12. Use Accelerated Reader
Online
53%
50%
50%
59%
13%
16%
5th grade
4th grade
3rd grade
2nd grade
1st grade
kindergarten
Note: Significantly higher for every grade except first which took big dip from 36%. 13%
Note: 56% of 4th grade parents and 68% of 5th grade parents use Infinite Campus.
12
13. PTA
3.07
4.03
4.04
4.11
4.32
1 2 3 4 5
Use Cassidy PTA Facebook page
Feel informed about purpose of
fundraisers
Believe fundraising is appropriate
Feel welcome to attend meetings
Satisfied with level of communication
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral,
4=agree, 5=strongly agree
13
14. SBDM
3.82
3.85
3.78
3.88
3.84
1 2 3 4 5
Satisfied with level of participation in
decision-making
Know about curricula meetings
Feel opinions on policy are considered
Feel welcome to attend SBDM meetings
Understood purpose of SBDM before
reading about it on survey
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral,
4=agree, 5=strongly agree
14
Note: Scores represent 0.22 - 0.30 increases from 2012.
15. Satisfaction with Teacher
by Grade
4.44
4.19
4.20
4.35
4.71
4.82
1 2 3 4 5
5th grade
4th grade
3rd grade
2nd grade
1st grade
Kindergarten
15
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral,
4=agree, 5=strongly agree
Note: Increases from 2012 for kindergarten and 1st grade.
Decreases for 2nd through 5th grades.
17. Cassidy Does Well…
• Teachers and staff--excellent
• Curriculum
• Communication
• Activities & events
17
18. Cassidy Could Improve…
• Physical activity
• Curriculum/AR
• Less emphasis on testing
• Cafeteria food
• Enforcement of carpool rules
18
19. PTA Does Well…
• Communicating and informing
• Fundraisers
• Teacher appreciation
19
20. PTA Could Improve…
• Fundraising (desire for fewer, different,
& less expensive fundraisers)
• Communication (some want more,
others less)
20
21. Additional Comments
• Overwhelmingly positive comments, many
expressions of thanks and love for the school
and the staff
• Concern about nutritional value of lunches
• Some parents still not following carpool
protocol
21
22. Conclusions
Parents are very satisfied with:
• Cassidy overall
• Administrators, staff, and teachers (particularly
those in grades K, 1, 5)
• Curriculum
• Most specials
• Communication from school and PTA
• Activities and events
22
23. Conclusions
Parents are least satisfied with:
• Food quality
• Opportunities for physical activity
• Emphasis on testing
• Too little challenge for bright students (most
parents who report that academic level is not
appropriate say it’s too low vs. too high)
• Too much review at beginning of year
• Spanish class
• Lack of effective response to bullying
23
25. Kindergarten –
Satisfaction with Teacher
0%
2%
2%
7%
90%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.82
25
26. Kindergarten
4.74
4.17
4.49
4.61
4.64
4.36
4.58
4.59
1 2 3 4 5
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
26
27. Kindergarten
4.61
4.79
4.84
4.04
4.18
4.70
4.65
4.65
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
27
28. Kindergarten
• 89% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 7% too low and 4% too high
• Children are anxious about…
28
66%
7%
5%
7%
14%
9%
9%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
29. Kindergarten-Comments
• Overwhelmingly happy with teachers
• Too much testing, academics, and homework for
kindergarten
• Desire for more movement and "rest or down
time" during the school day
29
30. First Grade –
Satisfaction with Teacher
0%
0%
4%
21%
75%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.71
30
31. First Grade
4.63
4.27
4.48
4.44
4.33
4.44
4.35
4.02
1 2 3 4 5
well informed about child's performance
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
31
32. First Grade
4.48
4.67
4.73
4.19
4.35
4.58
4.56
4.65
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
32
33. First Grade
• 90% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 6% too low and 4% too high
• Children are anxious about…
33
70%
2%
2%
4%
14%
2%
14%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
34. First Grade-Comments
• Overwhelmingly positive
• Good communication
• Love for specific teachers
• Excessive expectations on 6 year-olds
• Recess too late for 6 year-olds
• Need more teacher attention on playground
34
35. Second Grade –
Satisfaction with Teacher
5%
0%
8%
28%
58%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.35
35
36. Second Grade
4.47
4.38
4.31
4.29
4.19
4.22
4.19
3.98
1 2 3 4 5
well informed about child's performance
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
36
37. Second Grade
4.54
4.43
4.67
3.76
4.03
4.46
4.53
4.49
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
37
38. Second Grade
• 78% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 20% too low and 2% too high
• Children are anxious about…
38
62%
10%
8%
8%
22%
12%
13%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
39. Second Grade-Comments
• Most had very positive experience
• Very positive comments about some teachers
(one in particular) and negative for another
• Too many new teachers
• Too much review at beginning of the year
• Lack of response to some “bullying” behavior
• Too little challenge for bright children
39
40. Third Grade –
Satisfaction with Teacher
2%
7%
9%
32%
50%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.20
40
41. Third Grade
4.34
4.23
4.27
4.32
4.23
4.34
4.34
3.82
1 2 3 4 5
well informed about child's performance
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
41
42. Third Grade
4.23
4.27
4.43
4.20
4.27
4.39
4.39
4.28
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
42
43. Third Grade
• 91% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 7% too low and 2% too high
• Children are anxious about…
43
47%
8%
9%
9%
16%
13%
24%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
44. Third Grade-Comments
• Good communication
• Lots of positive feedback for 1 teacher
• Teachers push children to meet expectations
• Teachers able to identify strengths
• Problem with discipline (lack of control and
excessive punishment)
• Several said 3rd grade was a poor experience
• Students are anxious
• AR goals too high
• Lack of flexibility in math groupings
44
45. Fourth Grade –
Satisfaction with Teacher
3%
9%
9%
22%
56%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.19
45
46. Fourth Grade
4.15
3.82
4.26
4.38
4.09
4.35
4.44
4.06
1 2 3 4 5
well informed about child's performance
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
46
47. Fourth Grade
4.44
4.29
4.50
4.00
4.26
4.32
4.15
4.21
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
47
48. Fourth Grade
• 79% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 14% too low and 6% too high
• Children are anxious about…
48
53%
15%
3%
12%
26%
15%
18%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
49. Fourth Grade-Comments
• Teachers very good, care about students, provide
welcoming environments, understand the children’s
needs
• Students had positive growth both academically and
personally
• Highly satisfied with the 4-H camp experience
• Improvement needed to the literacy & writing plans
• Over-emphasis on testing not appropriate for some
children’s learning styles.
49
50. Fifth Grade –
Satisfaction with Teacher
3%
9%
9%
22%
56%
strongly disagree
disagree
neither agree nor disagree
agree
strongly agree
Mean = 4.44
50
51. Fifth Grade
4.36
4.08
4.38
4.47
4.15
4.38
4.36
3.67
1 2 3 4 5
well informed about child's performance
teacher follows homework policy
child made year's growth in literacy
child made year's growth in math
satisfaction - monthly AR goal
satisfaction - literacy curriculum
satisfaction - math curriculum
opportunities to be physically active
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
51
52. Fifth Grade
4.36
4.23
4.46
3.97
4.21
4.38
4.46
4.44
1 2 3 4 5
satisfaction - opportunities to volunteer in class
confidence problems would be resolved
comfort approaching teacher with concerns
understand other standardized testing
understand how MAP testing affects placement
satisfaction - discussion of parent-teacher conf
satisfaction -number parent-teacher conferences
satisfaction - communication with teacher
1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree
52
53. Fifth Grade
• 90% say academic level is appropriate for their
child vs. 7% too low and 3% too high
• Children are anxious about…
53
40%
15%
10%
7%
18%
5%
28%
none
other
lunchroom
curriculum
homework
teacher
peers
54. Fifth Grade-Comments
• Parents pleased with the Cassidy experience when looking
from perspective of an exiting student
• Praise for the personal growth seen in children
• Lots of praise for specific teachers
• Frustration with teachers’ & administrators’ inability to
control bullying & discussion of ramifications it has on kids
• Student-led conferences not informative or effective, and
parents would like time to talk to teachers privately
• Too many projects
• Entrepreneur Fair expensive, laborious for parents, & too
many selling food
• Some children not challenged enough
54
55. Acknowledgements
The SBDM Survey Committee would like to thank the
following people for their assistance with the survey:
• Rhonda Fister and Cassidy teachers who gave input
on survey questions
• Robyn Birch for providing parent email addresses
• All Cassidy parents who completed the survey
• The Institute for Workplace Innovation (iwin) for
materials and time
• iwin research associate, Nick Coomer, for assistance
with Qualtrics survey software
55