This document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and its relevance and applications. It provides an overview of key aspects of the CEFR including its aims to stimulate reflection on language teaching practices and provide common reference points for describing language proficiency levels. It describes the CEFR levels and their salient characteristics. It also discusses how the CEFR can be used for joined-up thinking in language planning, teaching, and assessment. Specifically, it discusses how the CEFR can be used to provide "can do" statements to signpost learning objectives, and how its descriptors can help specify teaching content and assessment criteria.
CEFR Common European Framework of Reference for LanguagesJoel Acosta
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, abbreviated as CEFR, is a guideline used to describe achievements of learners of foreign languages across Europe and, increasingly, in other countries (for example, Colombia and the Philippines). It was put together by the Council of Europe as the main part of the project "Language Learning for European Citizenship" between 1989 and 1996. Its main aim is to provide a method of learning, teaching and assessing which applies to all languages in Europe.
Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)Sreeram Bojja
This document helps the language learners to understand what they know and do not know. This also serves as a tool to assess one's self and then to set appropriate learning goals.
Developed through a process of scientific research and wide consultation, the Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR), sponsored by the European Council, provides a practical tool for setting clear standards to be attained at successive stages of learning and for evaluating outcomes in an internationally comparable manner.
This presentation gives a rudimentary explanation of each level of the CEFR, including the exams tested; also a summary of the grammar areas to be covered in each level is provided. Notice that the presentation contains active links.
CEFR Common European Framework of Reference for LanguagesJoel Acosta
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, abbreviated as CEFR, is a guideline used to describe achievements of learners of foreign languages across Europe and, increasingly, in other countries (for example, Colombia and the Philippines). It was put together by the Council of Europe as the main part of the project "Language Learning for European Citizenship" between 1989 and 1996. Its main aim is to provide a method of learning, teaching and assessing which applies to all languages in Europe.
Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)Sreeram Bojja
This document helps the language learners to understand what they know and do not know. This also serves as a tool to assess one's self and then to set appropriate learning goals.
Developed through a process of scientific research and wide consultation, the Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR), sponsored by the European Council, provides a practical tool for setting clear standards to be attained at successive stages of learning and for evaluating outcomes in an internationally comparable manner.
This presentation gives a rudimentary explanation of each level of the CEFR, including the exams tested; also a summary of the grammar areas to be covered in each level is provided. Notice that the presentation contains active links.
#ELTchat - hashtagged conversations and CPD through social networkingMarisa Constantinides
Every Wednesday at 19:00 p.m. GMT, a great number of ELT teachers from all over the world log into their Twitter account and for one hour they hold an online discussion (chat) on a topic they have selected.
#ELTchat is a hashtag which appears on all tweets in this online conversation, it’s searchable and anyone who ‘searches’ for it and uses it can converse with any other Twitter user following the same hashtag. It’s followed by hundreds of ELT teachers every week.
This short presentation will look at how hashtagged discussions such as #ELTchat can
- create a feeling of community online amongst ELT professionals
- disseminate information, publications and research which would otherwise remain obscure to the average teacher
- engage and inspire teachers by sharing materials and links
- encourage teachers to keep abreast of new publications and new technologies
- help teachers maintain their interest in their profession
- provide support and create important relationships and connections
The result of this is an expanded and strong Personal Learning Network (PLN) which can help teachers personally and professionally and keep them motivated and connected by maintaining their relationship with an ever expanding PLN through other Social Networks such as
• Facebook
• Linked In
• Google+
It can develop dialogues and disseminate blog posts and materials shared – thus becoming a tool tools for Continuous Professional Development which is free, autonomous, and self-directed.
Recording (23min):
http://lancelot.adobeconnect.com/p6eu0wupb69/
"The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach him accordingly" Ausubel, D..P. (1960) Thia short presentation hopes to show the value of using a variety of tools including graphics organizers which function as 'advance organizers' in Ausubel's quote above and help the teacher scaffold learning
This seminar-workshop was developed at the request of Ephesians Publishing Inc. for the Manila Central University teacher training series for elementary school and high school teachers. This was conducted on May 29, 2013.
Participants will review different lesson-design models and strategies for organizing and delivering instruction. Presenters will share specific examples of techniques that integrate language and content and provide a coherent learning experience for students. Through hands-on activities, participants will examine a variety of instructional sequences that exemplify the components of an effective lesson.
A presentation about assessment in Moroccan high school. The standards-based approach to the teaching of English suggested in this Slideshare requires performance-based assessment.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
3. CEFR Aims
Stimulate Reflection
– Consider relevant aspects
– Evaluate current practice: Does it make
sense?
Provide Common Reference Points
– CEFR levels, illustrative descriptors
4. Common Reference Points
Specifying content:
– What is taught and assessed
Stating criteria:
– How performance is interpreted
Describing the levels of programmes,
tests and exams:
– How comparisons can be made
5. Common Reference Points
Descriptors and Levels:
– Categories of descriptors
– Profiles
– Salient characteristics of levels
Relevance of CEFR:
– Networking
– Joined up thinking
– Learner focus
6. Descriptors
Informal Discussion B2
• Can take an active part in informal discussion in
familiar contexts.
• Can with some effort catch much of what is said
around him/her in discussion, but may find it difficult
to participate effectively in discussion with several
native speakers who do not modify their language in
any way.
• Can account for and sustain his/her opinions in
discussion by providing relevant explanations,
arguments and comments.
7. Communicative Activities
Communicative
Strategies
Communicative
Language Competencies
Reception Production
Understanding
a native speaker
Conversation
Informal
Discussion
Formal
Discussion
Obtaining Goods
and Services
Interviewing &
being interviewed
Spoken Written
Interaction Mediation
Overall Language Proficiency
Communicative
Activities
Communicative
Strategies
Communicative
Language Competencies
Reception Production
Understanding
a native speaker
Conversation
Informal
Discussion
Formal
Discussion
Obtaining Goods
and Services
Interviewing &
being interviewed
Spoken Written
Interaction Mediation
Overall Language Proficiency
Communicative
Activities
9. Aspects of Quality B2
• Range: Has a sufficient range of language to be able to
give clear descriptions, express viewpoints on most general
topics, without much conspicuous searching for words,
using some complex sentence forms to do so.
• Accuracy: Shows a relatively high degree of grammatical
control. Does not make errors which cause
misunderstanding, and can correct most of his/her
mistakes.
• Fluency: Can produce stretches of language with a fairly
even tempo; although he/she can be hesitant as he/she
searches for patterns and expressions, there are few
noticeably long pauses.
24. Salient Characteristics A1
The point at which the learner can:
• interact in a simple way
• ask and answer simple questions about
themselves
• respond to statements in areas of immediate
need
rather than relying purely on a rehearsed
repertoire of phrases
25. Salient Characteristics A2
The majority of descriptors stating social
functions:
• greet people, ask how they are and react to news
• handle very short social exchanges
• discuss what to do, where to go and make
arrangements
Descriptors on getting out and about:
• make simple transactions in shops, banks etc.
• get simple information about travel and services
26. Salient Characteristics B1
Maintain interaction & get across what you
want:
• give or seek personal views and opinions
• express the main point comprehensibly
• keep going comprehensibly, even though pausing
evident, especially in longer stretches
Cope flexibly with problems in everyday life:
• deal with most situations likely to arise when
travelling
• enter unprepared into conversations on familiar
27. Salient Characteristics B2
Effective argument:
• account for and sustain opinions in discussion by providing
relevant explanations and arguments
• explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages
and disadvantages of various options
Holding your own in social discourse:
• interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes
regular interaction with native speakers possible
• adjust to changes of direction, style and emphasis
A new degree of language awareness:
• make a note of "favourite mistakes" and monitor
speech/writing for them
28. Salient Characteristics C1
Fluent, well-structured language:
• good command of a broad lexical repertoire
allowing gaps to be readily overcome with
circumlocutions
• express self fluently and spontaneously, almost
effortlessly
• produce clear, smoothly-flowing, well-structured
speech, showing controlled use of organisational
patterns, connectors and cohesive devices
29. Salient Characteristics C2
Precision and ease with the language:
• convey finer shades of meaning precisely by using,
with reasonable accuracy, a wide range of
modification devices
• show great flexibility reformulating ideas in
differing linguistic forms to give emphasis, to
differentiate and to eliminate ambiguity
30. Relevance of the CEFR
• Networking and communication
• Joined up thinking:
– planning
– teaching
– assessment
• Learner Focus
31. Learner focus
• Teaching unplugged
• Learner as social user: needs analysis
• Learner as subject – not object: learner
experience at centre; personal meaning
• Links to previous knowledge, knowledge of the
world, real world skills
• Learner as plurilingual being – strategies/skills
transfer
• Steps towards self-direction (European
Language Portfolio)
32. Relevance of the CEFR
• Networking and communication
• Joined up thinking:
– planning
– teaching
– assessment
• Learner Focus
33. Joined-up thinking
• Planning:
– Curriculum aims, schemes of work
– “Sign-posting” with Can Dos
• Teaching:
– Action-oriented approach: language
and activity
– Practice and error
– A strategic approach
• Assessment and Certification
34. Signposting with Can Do‘s
• learners see why they are learning things
• learners and teachers set priorities
• teachers select appropriate communicative
tasks
• learners focus on form during
communicative tasks
• learners and teachers to assess progress
• schools to report progress to parents
36. Listening
Understand everyday conversations and discussions
Understand a recorded story narrated clearly
Spoken Interaction
Ask for & give information about feelings and news
Talk about likes, dislikes and problems
Discuss opinions
Organise an event and solve problems
Give advice and recommendations
Talk about possibilities in the future
Communicate confidently during travelling and sightseeing
Compare and contrast choices. e.g. where to go and what to do
Explain a problem face-to-face or on the phone
Spoken Production
Describe and compare places
Describe hopes and ambitions
Give detailed directions and instructions
Describe events or experiences, express feelings and reactions
Communicative
Tasks
The most
important things
you need to do in
the language at
this level.
Reading
Understand descriptions of events and reactions to them (e.g. in personal letters)
Understand signs and notices and instructions
Understand the main points of a story
Understand letters, notes and emails from friends
Writing
Write a short letter (e.g. postcard)
Write 400 Chinese characters
Grammar
Use different adverbs like just
Use different expressions: besides, some… others,
Make questions with ba and rang
Make comparisons (bi) and not as good as
Language
Resources
The grammar and
vocabulary you
need to
communicate
successfully in
the
communicative
tasks listed
above.
Vocabulary
Cultural topics e.g. music, films
Feelings and emotions
Professions and work
Products
Language for giving opinions, agreeing and disagreeing
Telephone language
Travel and services vocabulary
37. Listening
Understand everyday conversations and discussions
Understand a recorded story narrated clearly
Spoken Interaction
Ask for & give information about feelings and news
Talk about likes, dislikes and problems
Discuss opinions
Organise an event and solve problems
Give advice and recommendations
Talk about possibilities in the future
Communicate confidently during travelling and sightseeing
Compare and contrast choices. e.g. where to go and what to do
Explain a problem face-to-face or on the phone
Spoken Production
Describe and compare places
Describe hopes and ambitions
Give detailed directions and instructions
Describe events or experiences, express feelings and reactions
Communicative
Tasks
The most
important things
you need to do in
the language at
this level.
Reading
Understand descriptions of events and reactions to them (e.g. in personal letters)
Understand signs and notices and instructions
Understand the main points of a story
Understand letters, notes and emails from friends
Writing
Write a short letter (e.g. postcard)
Write 400 Chinese characters
38. Joined-up thinking
• Planning:
– Curriculum aims, schemes of work
– “Sign-posting” with Can Dos
• Teaching:
– Action-oriented approach: language
and activity
– Practice and error
– A strategic approach
• Assessment and Certification
39. Teaching Activity Sequence
The difference between good and bad language teaching
= mainly the connections between Language + Activity
Task-oriented:
Task-based:
40. Practice
• Task-orientation does not at all make practice
obsolete
• Learning a sport/skill requires controlled
practice, plus knowledge; players go jogging,
study tactics
• Learning a sport requires realistic experience
• Autonomous learners: Exposure > Systematic
Practice (form) > Non-systematic practice (sit.s)
• Contextualised practice (a) shifts new things into
“stable” competence; (b) enables automaticity
41. Implications
• Don’t focus on grammar and errors; use of new
structures, breath of expression, fluency, are
more important
• Don’t race through the book - recycle. Learners
need space, meaning-negotiation for transfer
• Do give fluency practice linking and activity
(grammar games, broader, structured tasks )
• Do demand accuracy with what should be
“scripts” learnt as a chunk for certain scenarios
42. Strategies: train students
• how to work in groups: setting a frame;
formulating deep questions; summarising progress
(Interaction strategies)
• how to formulate and check a hypothesis of text
meaning; to infer meaning of new words, log and
practice new words (Reception strategies)
• how to plan (graphic organisers), use
circumlocution, consult dictionaries, draft /
redraft, monitor and correct “favourite mistakes”
(Production strategies)
43. Joined-up thinking
• Planning:
– Curriculum aims, schemes of work
– “Sign-posting” with Can Dos
• Teaching:
– Action-oriented approach: language
and activity
– Practice and error
– A strategic approach
• Assessment and Certification
44. Start with Familiarisation
• People think they know the levels without
consulting descriptors & samples
• People associate CEFR levels with ones
they are familiar with
• People interpret the written word
differently – in descriptors too
45. Assessing CEFR level
• Specification:
– relating the curriculum to Can Do’s
– teacher (and self- ) assessment checklists
– defining/selecting activities, tests
• Standardisation:
– training with documented performance samples
– bench-marking “local” performance samples
• Validation:
– two sources (test/teachers; two assessors)
47. Why do Standardisation?
Levels: See and agree – not just documents
Performance: What should we expect?
– Imperfect performances: Accuracy declines at B1
– Teachers often have unrealistic expectations
Assessment “Errors”:
– Using own, private concepts and criteria
– Unconscious lead criterion (accuracy / fluency)
– Severity / lenience
– Refusal to give top grade/mark
48. EAQUALS Resources
Curriculum
• Can Do’s (with plus levels)
• Core Inventory: English / French (November)
• Scenarios for teaching modules (in above)
• Curriculum self-help pack
• Curriculum case studies
Assessment
• Performance samples
• Standardisation packs (speaking) E, D, F, I
• Assessment tasks (listen & reading) Eng, Fre (?)
Certification Scheme