This presentation gives a rudimentary explanation of each level of the CEFR, including the exams tested; also a summary of the grammar areas to be covered in each level is provided. Notice that the presentation contains active links.
Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)Sreeram Bojja
This document helps the language learners to understand what they know and do not know. This also serves as a tool to assess one's self and then to set appropriate learning goals.
Developed through a process of scientific research and wide consultation, the Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR), sponsored by the European Council, provides a practical tool for setting clear standards to be attained at successive stages of learning and for evaluating outcomes in an internationally comparable manner.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides a common basis for describing language ability across Europe. It describes what language learners need to know and be able to do to use a language for communication. The CEFR defines six reference levels of language proficiency from A1 for basic users to C2 for mastery. It also outlines the grammatical structures and competencies required at each level. The CEFR takes a communicative approach, focusing on learners' needs and basing teaching on developing communicative competence through everyday interactions and cultural understanding.
Common European Framework of Reference for LanguagesCamila Roldán
This webinar provided an overview of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It explained that the CEFR is a framework used to describe language proficiency in a standardized way across languages and locations. It described the six levels of language ability in the CEFR from A1 to C2. The webinar also discussed how the CEFR can be used by language teachers, learners, exam boards and others. It reviewed the different components of the CEFR including the global scale, illustrative scales, and self-assessment grid.
Can-do statements are learning objectives that describe what a student can do in English at a particular level of proficiency. They are clear, easily understandable, and achievable goals. The document discusses why can-do statements are better for setting course objectives than TOEIC scores alone. It proposes that teachers agree on can-do standards from the CEFR and use textbooks aligned with those standards. It also suggests steps the language center could take to support the use of can-do statements, such as trialing them, providing materials, and standardizing assessment. Opinions are requested on these proposals.
The document provides a self-assessment grid based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. It outlines 6 levels - A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2 - for 4 language skills: Listening, Reading, Spoken Interaction, Spoken Production, and Writing. For each level and skill, it provides a brief 3 sentence description of the language abilities and tasks that someone at that level would be expected to demonstrate. The grid allows language learners to assess their own abilities and proficiency level in different skills.
Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)Sreeram Bojja
This document helps the language learners to understand what they know and do not know. This also serves as a tool to assess one's self and then to set appropriate learning goals.
Developed through a process of scientific research and wide consultation, the Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR), sponsored by the European Council, provides a practical tool for setting clear standards to be attained at successive stages of learning and for evaluating outcomes in an internationally comparable manner.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides a common basis for describing language ability across Europe. It describes what language learners need to know and be able to do to use a language for communication. The CEFR defines six reference levels of language proficiency from A1 for basic users to C2 for mastery. It also outlines the grammatical structures and competencies required at each level. The CEFR takes a communicative approach, focusing on learners' needs and basing teaching on developing communicative competence through everyday interactions and cultural understanding.
Common European Framework of Reference for LanguagesCamila Roldán
This webinar provided an overview of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It explained that the CEFR is a framework used to describe language proficiency in a standardized way across languages and locations. It described the six levels of language ability in the CEFR from A1 to C2. The webinar also discussed how the CEFR can be used by language teachers, learners, exam boards and others. It reviewed the different components of the CEFR including the global scale, illustrative scales, and self-assessment grid.
Can-do statements are learning objectives that describe what a student can do in English at a particular level of proficiency. They are clear, easily understandable, and achievable goals. The document discusses why can-do statements are better for setting course objectives than TOEIC scores alone. It proposes that teachers agree on can-do standards from the CEFR and use textbooks aligned with those standards. It also suggests steps the language center could take to support the use of can-do statements, such as trialing them, providing materials, and standardizing assessment. Opinions are requested on these proposals.
The document provides a self-assessment grid based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. It outlines 6 levels - A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2 - for 4 language skills: Listening, Reading, Spoken Interaction, Spoken Production, and Writing. For each level and skill, it provides a brief 3 sentence description of the language abilities and tasks that someone at that level would be expected to demonstrate. The grid allows language learners to assess their own abilities and proficiency level in different skills.
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and its relevance for modern foreign language (MFL) classrooms. It provides an overview of the CEFR, including its origins in the Council of Europe and objectives of establishing a common system for language learning, teaching and assessment. It outlines key CEFR principles like learner autonomy and plurilingualism. It also discusses how the CEFR's "can-do" approach and use of language portfolios can support learning and teaching in MFL classrooms by focusing on what learners can do and facilitating reflection.
BrianNorthWhat does the CEFR mean in practice? What's new?eaquals
This document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and its relevance and applications. It provides an overview of key aspects of the CEFR including its aims to stimulate reflection on language teaching practices and provide common reference points for describing language proficiency levels. It describes the CEFR levels and their salient characteristics. It also discusses how the CEFR can be used for joined-up thinking in language planning, teaching, and assessment. Specifically, it discusses how the CEFR can be used to provide "can do" statements to signpost learning objectives, and how its descriptors can help specify teaching content and assessment criteria.
The document discusses how using the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) can help with curriculum development and language teaching. It describes how the CEFR provides a common basis for setting learning goals, organizing courses, and assessing proficiency levels. Specific benefits mentioned include orienting courses towards real-world language needs, facilitating communication between teachers and other stakeholders, and allowing students and schools to track language progress.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides common standards for teaching, learning, and assessing foreign languages across Europe. Published in 2001 by the Council of Europe, the CEFR describes foreign language proficiency at six levels from A1 to C2. It helps teachers set goals, select materials, and evaluate progress. Teachers can use the CEFR's detailed descriptions of language skills and example "can do" statements to guide instruction and help students self-assess. The CEFR also encourages students to reflect on their learning through language portfolios and take ownership of their progress toward communication goals.
This document provides an overview and introduction to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. It acknowledges contributions from language experts across Europe who helped develop the Framework. The Framework aims to encourage reflection on language learning and teaching and to help practitioners set clear objectives and describe what learners should achieve. It provides a comprehensive descriptive scheme to define language competencies and map learner progress across common reference levels. The Framework is not prescriptive but intended as a tool for practitioners to define objectives and describe methods and outcomes in a transparent, coherent manner.
This document outlines assessment criteria for Paper 2 (written assignment) for both SL and HL students. It is divided into three criteria:
1. Language - Evaluates effective and accurate use of language, range of vocabulary, and sentence structure.
2. Message - Assesses how clearly and coherently ideas are developed and organized and how appropriate supporting details are.
3. Format - Judges how well the required text type is produced and how appropriate conventions of the text type are.
Scores range from 0 to 10 for each criterion. Descriptors provide guidance for assessing performance within each score range. Comments sections are included for examiner notes. Failure to meet the minimum word count results in a 1-mark
Brian North: Recent updates to CEFR Riga 2017_finaleaquals
1. The document discusses recent updates made to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), including updating descriptors, developing new scales for mediation, and replacing the phonology scale.
2. It proposes considering language proficiency in terms of four modes (interaction, production, reception, mediation) rather than four skills. Descriptors are provided for each mode at different CEFR levels.
3. The new scales for mediation assess abilities like summarizing information from different written/spoken sources, explaining data and processing texts in speech or writing.
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It provides an overview of what the CEFR aims to do, which includes stimulating reflection on language teaching practices and providing common reference points for describing language proficiency levels. It describes some key aspects of the CEFR, such as the descriptive scales for language skills, communicative language competencies, and qualitative aspects of proficiency levels. The CEFR is intended to facilitate networking, joined-up thinking in language planning, teaching and assessment, and keeping the learner experience as the focus.
Mansour and Arvids are taking a Cambridge Key English Test (KET) speaking exam. They are assessed as
level A2 speakers. [1] Mansour can exchange basic information using simple phrases but makes frequent
errors. [2] Arvids also uses basic structures with hesitation, characterized by systematic errors. [3] Both
candidates can communicate simple information and interact with support despite language limitations.
The common european framework of reference for languagesJheyswat
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) was developed between 1993 and 1996 by an international working party and published in 2001 by the Council of Europe. It introduced six common reference levels (A1-C2) to standardize descriptions of language ability. The CEFR aims to provide a transparent, coherent and comprehensive framework that can be used flexibly for various purposes including curriculum design, assessment, and comparing language abilities across different countries and educational systems.
The document certifies that Laila Orsi has qualified at the following ACTFL proficiency levels in Portuguese:
1) Advanced Mid level speaker based on an OPIc test taken on April 22, 2015.
2) Advanced Low level listener based on a Listening Proficiency Test taken on May 12, 2015.
3) Advanced Low level reader based on a Reading Proficiency Test taken on May 12, 2015.
It also provides brief descriptions of the language abilities characteristic of Advanced Mid speakers and Advanced Low listeners and readers according to the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines.
Lorenzo Gregory successfully completed the ACTFL Writing Proficiency Test in Spanish and was rated at the Intermediate High level. The Intermediate High level means he can write compositions and summaries about work or school and narrate and describe past, present and future events. His writing may have some errors but is generally comprehensible to Spanish speakers.
The document is a score report for Jacqueline Strebe who took an English proficiency exam. She scored 500 out of 500 in overall English abilities as well as in each sub-section of speaking, listening, reading and writing. This places her at the highest level of English mastery, with native-like abilities in all areas. The report also provides sample responses and descriptions of her language skills based on the test results.
John de Jong - Understanding rating scales eaquals
The document discusses understanding rating scales and language proficiency levels. It provides detailed descriptors for levels within the Common European Framework of Reference (CEF) from below A1 to C2. It also discusses using a global scale of English from 10 to 90 that maps onto CEF levels to address some disadvantages of the CEF. The document contains examples of interpreting exam data to determine the difficulty levels of test items based on candidate performance.
The document summarizes information about the Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) exam, which tests English proficiency at level C1, the second highest level of the Common European Framework of Reference. It describes who typically takes the exam, including those pursuing university studies or careers requiring advanced English skills. The exam comprehensively tests all areas of language ability through five papers assessing reading, writing, use of English, listening, and speaking. It aims to evaluate if candidates can effectively communicate and understand complex written and spoken English, as outlined by specific language abilities defined for level C1. Candidates will receive a certificate stating their proficiency level of C1, C2, or B2 based on their exam results.
Literacy instruction in the naf curriculum, andy rothsteinNAFCareerAcads
The document discusses the NAF literacy approach, which focuses on four critical experiences that drive literacy instruction: responding to texts, composing oral and written works, studying language patterns, and sustained self-selected reading. It also discusses developing vocabulary through word stories, genres that inform comprehension and writing, and the five-part cycle for literacy development that guides NAF courses. Key literacy strategies used in NAF include defining formats, taxonomies, anticipation guides, and the reading comprehension teaching cycle of before, during, and after reading activities.
Summary:The Common European Framework of Reference for Language JrPanaifo
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), which was created by the Council of Europe to standardize language assessments across Europe. The CEFR describes language proficiency through 6 levels from A1 to C2. It is used by curriculum developers, teachers, exam boards, and publishers to determine the language skills required for educational programs and jobs. While initially criticized for its broad levels, the CEFR provides a common system for comparing language qualifications internationally.
El documento presenta una introducción general a los conceptos fundamentales de la ecología, incluyendo biomas, biosfera, ecosistemas, ciclos biogeoquímicos, factores bióticos y abióticos, redes tróficas, sucesión ecológica, y las amenazas antropogénicas como la deforestación, contaminación y cambio climático. También describe la importancia de relacionar estos temas con cuestiones científicas, tecnológicas, éticas y sociales para lograr un desarrollo
El documento proporciona recetas para hacer diferentes materiales de arte y manualidades, como masa de sal, papel maché y arcilla, además de incluir anexos con fotos de niños realizando manualidades como canastas de aserrín, porta lápices, llaveros y animales marinos utilizando estos materiales.
Valentine's Day Gifts and Gift Baskets Specially for your valentine on the valentine 2014 only at giftblooms.com. Shop different gifts for your valentine.
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and its relevance for modern foreign language (MFL) classrooms. It provides an overview of the CEFR, including its origins in the Council of Europe and objectives of establishing a common system for language learning, teaching and assessment. It outlines key CEFR principles like learner autonomy and plurilingualism. It also discusses how the CEFR's "can-do" approach and use of language portfolios can support learning and teaching in MFL classrooms by focusing on what learners can do and facilitating reflection.
BrianNorthWhat does the CEFR mean in practice? What's new?eaquals
This document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and its relevance and applications. It provides an overview of key aspects of the CEFR including its aims to stimulate reflection on language teaching practices and provide common reference points for describing language proficiency levels. It describes the CEFR levels and their salient characteristics. It also discusses how the CEFR can be used for joined-up thinking in language planning, teaching, and assessment. Specifically, it discusses how the CEFR can be used to provide "can do" statements to signpost learning objectives, and how its descriptors can help specify teaching content and assessment criteria.
The document discusses how using the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) can help with curriculum development and language teaching. It describes how the CEFR provides a common basis for setting learning goals, organizing courses, and assessing proficiency levels. Specific benefits mentioned include orienting courses towards real-world language needs, facilitating communication between teachers and other stakeholders, and allowing students and schools to track language progress.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides common standards for teaching, learning, and assessing foreign languages across Europe. Published in 2001 by the Council of Europe, the CEFR describes foreign language proficiency at six levels from A1 to C2. It helps teachers set goals, select materials, and evaluate progress. Teachers can use the CEFR's detailed descriptions of language skills and example "can do" statements to guide instruction and help students self-assess. The CEFR also encourages students to reflect on their learning through language portfolios and take ownership of their progress toward communication goals.
This document provides an overview and introduction to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. It acknowledges contributions from language experts across Europe who helped develop the Framework. The Framework aims to encourage reflection on language learning and teaching and to help practitioners set clear objectives and describe what learners should achieve. It provides a comprehensive descriptive scheme to define language competencies and map learner progress across common reference levels. The Framework is not prescriptive but intended as a tool for practitioners to define objectives and describe methods and outcomes in a transparent, coherent manner.
This document outlines assessment criteria for Paper 2 (written assignment) for both SL and HL students. It is divided into three criteria:
1. Language - Evaluates effective and accurate use of language, range of vocabulary, and sentence structure.
2. Message - Assesses how clearly and coherently ideas are developed and organized and how appropriate supporting details are.
3. Format - Judges how well the required text type is produced and how appropriate conventions of the text type are.
Scores range from 0 to 10 for each criterion. Descriptors provide guidance for assessing performance within each score range. Comments sections are included for examiner notes. Failure to meet the minimum word count results in a 1-mark
Brian North: Recent updates to CEFR Riga 2017_finaleaquals
1. The document discusses recent updates made to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), including updating descriptors, developing new scales for mediation, and replacing the phonology scale.
2. It proposes considering language proficiency in terms of four modes (interaction, production, reception, mediation) rather than four skills. Descriptors are provided for each mode at different CEFR levels.
3. The new scales for mediation assess abilities like summarizing information from different written/spoken sources, explaining data and processing texts in speech or writing.
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It provides an overview of what the CEFR aims to do, which includes stimulating reflection on language teaching practices and providing common reference points for describing language proficiency levels. It describes some key aspects of the CEFR, such as the descriptive scales for language skills, communicative language competencies, and qualitative aspects of proficiency levels. The CEFR is intended to facilitate networking, joined-up thinking in language planning, teaching and assessment, and keeping the learner experience as the focus.
Mansour and Arvids are taking a Cambridge Key English Test (KET) speaking exam. They are assessed as
level A2 speakers. [1] Mansour can exchange basic information using simple phrases but makes frequent
errors. [2] Arvids also uses basic structures with hesitation, characterized by systematic errors. [3] Both
candidates can communicate simple information and interact with support despite language limitations.
The common european framework of reference for languagesJheyswat
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) was developed between 1993 and 1996 by an international working party and published in 2001 by the Council of Europe. It introduced six common reference levels (A1-C2) to standardize descriptions of language ability. The CEFR aims to provide a transparent, coherent and comprehensive framework that can be used flexibly for various purposes including curriculum design, assessment, and comparing language abilities across different countries and educational systems.
The document certifies that Laila Orsi has qualified at the following ACTFL proficiency levels in Portuguese:
1) Advanced Mid level speaker based on an OPIc test taken on April 22, 2015.
2) Advanced Low level listener based on a Listening Proficiency Test taken on May 12, 2015.
3) Advanced Low level reader based on a Reading Proficiency Test taken on May 12, 2015.
It also provides brief descriptions of the language abilities characteristic of Advanced Mid speakers and Advanced Low listeners and readers according to the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines.
Lorenzo Gregory successfully completed the ACTFL Writing Proficiency Test in Spanish and was rated at the Intermediate High level. The Intermediate High level means he can write compositions and summaries about work or school and narrate and describe past, present and future events. His writing may have some errors but is generally comprehensible to Spanish speakers.
The document is a score report for Jacqueline Strebe who took an English proficiency exam. She scored 500 out of 500 in overall English abilities as well as in each sub-section of speaking, listening, reading and writing. This places her at the highest level of English mastery, with native-like abilities in all areas. The report also provides sample responses and descriptions of her language skills based on the test results.
John de Jong - Understanding rating scales eaquals
The document discusses understanding rating scales and language proficiency levels. It provides detailed descriptors for levels within the Common European Framework of Reference (CEF) from below A1 to C2. It also discusses using a global scale of English from 10 to 90 that maps onto CEF levels to address some disadvantages of the CEF. The document contains examples of interpreting exam data to determine the difficulty levels of test items based on candidate performance.
The document summarizes information about the Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) exam, which tests English proficiency at level C1, the second highest level of the Common European Framework of Reference. It describes who typically takes the exam, including those pursuing university studies or careers requiring advanced English skills. The exam comprehensively tests all areas of language ability through five papers assessing reading, writing, use of English, listening, and speaking. It aims to evaluate if candidates can effectively communicate and understand complex written and spoken English, as outlined by specific language abilities defined for level C1. Candidates will receive a certificate stating their proficiency level of C1, C2, or B2 based on their exam results.
Literacy instruction in the naf curriculum, andy rothsteinNAFCareerAcads
The document discusses the NAF literacy approach, which focuses on four critical experiences that drive literacy instruction: responding to texts, composing oral and written works, studying language patterns, and sustained self-selected reading. It also discusses developing vocabulary through word stories, genres that inform comprehension and writing, and the five-part cycle for literacy development that guides NAF courses. Key literacy strategies used in NAF include defining formats, taxonomies, anticipation guides, and the reading comprehension teaching cycle of before, during, and after reading activities.
Summary:The Common European Framework of Reference for Language JrPanaifo
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), which was created by the Council of Europe to standardize language assessments across Europe. The CEFR describes language proficiency through 6 levels from A1 to C2. It is used by curriculum developers, teachers, exam boards, and publishers to determine the language skills required for educational programs and jobs. While initially criticized for its broad levels, the CEFR provides a common system for comparing language qualifications internationally.
El documento presenta una introducción general a los conceptos fundamentales de la ecología, incluyendo biomas, biosfera, ecosistemas, ciclos biogeoquímicos, factores bióticos y abióticos, redes tróficas, sucesión ecológica, y las amenazas antropogénicas como la deforestación, contaminación y cambio climático. También describe la importancia de relacionar estos temas con cuestiones científicas, tecnológicas, éticas y sociales para lograr un desarrollo
El documento proporciona recetas para hacer diferentes materiales de arte y manualidades, como masa de sal, papel maché y arcilla, además de incluir anexos con fotos de niños realizando manualidades como canastas de aserrín, porta lápices, llaveros y animales marinos utilizando estos materiales.
Valentine's Day Gifts and Gift Baskets Specially for your valentine on the valentine 2014 only at giftblooms.com. Shop different gifts for your valentine.
Este documento describe los peligros físicos en el lugar de trabajo y cómo identificar y evaluar los riesgos. Define términos como accidente laboral, enfermedad profesional y riesgo aceptable. Explica los peligros laborales como máquinas sin protección y contaminantes químicos y biológicos. Finalmente, cubre la identificación de peligros y la evaluación de riesgos.
This presentation has HOWs and WHYs, tips and examples of organizations who were successful in creating strong internal brands and aligning their communications both internally and externally for better ROI.
We are a national marketing agency and data company that thinks like a startup but has the resources of an established company. We are modern, creative, fun, and experts in the latest digital marketing solutions with unmatched access to first-party consumer data. While not restricted to Northeast Ohio like a traditional newspaper company of the past, we are here to work with clients and not just sell to them or restrict ourselves based on who we were.
This document summarizes a study that used computational methods to predict the low-energy conformations of the CCR5 receptor and the binding sites for various ligands. It found that different ligands bind to different receptor conformations. It then validated the predictions by experimentally testing the effects of 11 single point mutations on ligand binding. The predicted binding energies from the mutant receptor conformations matched well with experimental results, supporting the concept that each ligand can stabilize a different receptor conformation.
Este documento describe las características del melanoma de extensión superficial. Es la segunda forma más común de melanoma y se presenta como una mácula o placa asimétrica de bordes irregulares. Microscópicamente se caracteriza por la proliferación de melanocitos atípicos formando nidos en la epidermis. El tratamiento consiste en la extirpación quirúrgica completa de la lesión antes de que se produzcan metástasis.
Este documento trata sobre la lateralidad. Explica que la lateralidad es la superioridad funcional de un lado del cuerpo sobre el otro y que es importante para facilitar la integración perceptiva y el desarrollo del esquema corporal. También describe las etapas prelaterales desde los 0 a los 4 años que son cruciales para el desarrollo de la dominancia lateral. Finalmente, concluye que las dificultades de aprendizaje pueden deberse a una lateralización atípica del cerebro y que la lateralización del lenguaje en el hemisferio izquierdo
Faramarz Didar was awarded a Master of Science degree with Commendation from the University of Hertfordshire for completing an approved program in Dermatology Skills and Treatment. The degree was conferred on July 14, 2015 and was signed by Professor Quintin McKellar, the Vice-Chancellor of the university.
La psicomotricidad es importante en los primeros años de vida para el desarrollo intelectual, afectivo y social de los niños. Influye en su relación con el entorno y en el establecimiento de necesidades e intereses individuales. A nivel motor, cognitivo y social-afectivo, la psicomotricidad permite a los niños dominar su movimiento corporal, mejorar su memoria, atención y creatividad, y relacionarse con los demás con más seguridad. Algunas áreas de la psicomotricidad son el esque
A quiz buzzer designed for 12 teams or less with push switches and beacons using a Microcontroller.
Partner: Swastik Technologies- Chennai.
Client: Muscat Codex - Oman.
El documento resume los principales temas relacionados con la globalización. En primer lugar, define la globalización como un proceso económico, tecnológico, social y cultural a escala global que consiste en la creciente interdependencia entre los países del mundo. Luego, analiza algunos aspectos clave como el capitalismo, el neoliberalismo en México y los efectos de la globalización en México y la salud. Finalmente, identifica tanto ventajas como desventajas generadas por el proceso de globalización.
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) was created by the Council of Europe to provide a common basis for designing language syllabuses and curriculum guidelines. It describes what language learners need to know and be able to do to use a language for communication, and defines six levels of language proficiency from A1 for beginners to C2 for mastery. The CEFR emphasizes a communicative approach to language teaching focused on learners' needs and using language pragmatically in real-life situations.
The document discusses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) developed by the Council of Europe to provide a common basis for describing language learning, teaching and assessment across Europe. It describes the CEFR's six levels of proficiency from A1 for beginners to C2 for mastery. It also outlines the CEFR's approach to classifying language skills into domains and communicative activities, and provides examples of "can do" statements describing what learners should be able to do at each level.
Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference ...Nelly Zafeiriades
This document provides information about relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It discusses how the CEFR describes levels of language proficiency in different skill areas. It also provides forms and checklists for describing reading comprehension and writing examinations based on CEFR levels. Sample reading comprehension questions and descriptions of writing tasks are presented along with indications of which CEFR levels they correspond to. The goal is to provide a common basis for describing and measuring language ability across examinations.
This document provides an introduction to the CAE Gold Plus coursebook. It describes the target student level as those planning to take the Cambridge Certificate in Advanced English exam. It outlines the coursebook's focus on consolidating and extending students' language skills and exam preparation. Each of the 14 units provides practice for all five CAE exam papers through grammar, vocabulary, reading, listening, writing and speaking exercises with a theme. It describes the additional included materials like the exam maximizer, CD-ROM and teacher's book to supplement the coursebook.
This document provides information about the IELTS exam format and scoring. It describes the four components of the IELTS exam - Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking. For each component, it outlines the question types, timing, scoring criteria, and level of difficulty. It also explains the 9-band scoring scale used to assess examinees' overall English proficiency and skill in each component.
The document provides information about the Achieve English test, including the four scores test-takers receive and details about the different sections. It discusses that test-takers receive an overall score, reading score, writing score, and CEFR band. It describes the writing section requires a 250-word essay based on a single prompt. The reading section includes questions on grammar, vocabulary, comprehension and inference skills. It provides practice resources and contact information for teachers to assist students.
This syllabus outlines a course to help students prepare for the TOEFL exam. The 16-session course covers key TOEFL test sections like listening, reading, grammar, and error recognition. Students will practice sample questions, learn test-taking strategies, and have opportunities for discussion. Assessment includes quizzes, assignments, a midterm, and a final exam. The goal is for students to improve their English proficiency in areas tested on the TOEFL so they can feel confident in their ability to succeed on the exam.
Alex Thorp: Testing tests. Realising the potential of assessment practiceseaquals
The document discusses testing and assessment practices. It provides an overview of contemporary testing approaches, outlines concerns with summative assessment, and presents a test analysis framework. The framework examines test tasks based on candidate characteristics, context validity, and cognitive validity. An example task is analyzed in detail to demonstrate how the framework can determine if a test is fit for its intended purpose.
The Preliminary English Test (PET) and PET for Schools are exams that assess intermediate English language ability. PET is for those wanting to improve work, study, and travel prospects and shows an understanding of instructions, conversations in work environments, and tourism. PET focuses on CEFR level B1 and tests reading, writing, speaking, listening, grammar, and vocabulary. PET for Schools is designed for school-aged learners and shows an ability to use English for everyday social and study purposes at a CEFR B1 level through assessing the same skills.
This document is a certificate certifying that Kun Lv completed the Speexx Active - English B1.2 course from July 14, 2014 to February 3, 2015. The certificate indicates that Kun Lv achieved a result of 100 points, passing with merit. The certificate equivalates Kun Lv's level to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B1.2 level. The document also outlines the learning objectives defined by the CEFR for levels A1 through C1.
1) The 2010 English SOLs place increased emphasis on nonfiction texts, text structures, vocabulary, and rigor. Reading passages will include more complex texts requiring inferences and conclusions.
2) Vocabulary assessment makes up 7 of 40 reading questions, focusing on prefixes, suffixes, Greek/Latin roots, and context clues. Sample lesson plans are provided for word study skills.
3) Passages and items will assess identifying text structures like sequence, main idea and details, cause/effect, and comprehension through graphic organizers and summarizing. Partial credit will not be given on reading test items.
This document appears to be a resume or CV for Mohammed Abdulshakoor Abdualrahman Mohammed, who works as a human resources development trainer in English. The summary provides his contact information, work experience from 2008-2014 training at various centers, skills including report writing and leadership, courses taught on topics like marketing and human resources, English language activities conducted, and memberships in professional organizations. It also lists universities and organizations he has participated in workshops with.
This document provides information about an English as a second language (ESL) course offered by CIP. The course offers various formats from premium to intensive levels that include different combinations of one-on-one and small group classes with native and non-native English speakers. Students can choose from options focused on travel, academics, or beginner English and will participate in 9 hours of regular and optional classes daily to improve their reading, writing, speaking, listening, vocabulary and grammar skills. The course aims to help students communicate effectively in English for personal or professional purposes.
Trường Anh ngữ CIP – thành phố Clark
Học tiếng Anh lớp 1:1 với giáo viên bản ngữ (Anh, Mỹ, Úc, Canada, New Zeland…) tại thành phố Clark – gần thủ đô Manila
Trường Anh ngữ CIP (Clark Institution of the Philippines) thành lập năm 2007, là trường dạy tiếng Anh theo mô hình 1:1 (1 học viên học trực tiếp với 1 giáo viên) với giáo viên bản ngữ từ Anh, Mỹ, Úc, Canada, New Zealand… và giáo viên Filipino. CIP chấp nhận học viên từ 7 tuổi trở lên từ các quốc gia khác nhau như Hàn Quốc, Nhật Bản, Việt Nam, Trung Quốc, Đài Loan, Brazil, Yemen, Nga…
Học viên có thể ghi danh vào các khóa đào tạo phù hợp với nhu cầu của mình gồm tiếng Anh cơ bản đến nâng cao (Intensive Premium, A, B, C & D), luyện thi IELTS, TOEIC, TOEFL, tiếng Anh thương mại & LCCI, Anh văn cho trẻ em (A & C), Anh văn cho người mới bắt đầu với lớp 1:1 do giáo viên bản ngữ dạy lớp 1:1 và tất cả các lớp học nhóm.
✈ Liên hệ với MICE để được hỗ trợ chi tiết về Du học tiếng Anh Philippines:
Điện thoại: 0904 13 74 71
Email: info@tienganhtaiphi.com
Skype: tienganhtaiphi.com
Website: http://tienganhtaiphi.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tienganhtaiphilippines
Khu phố 1, P. Tăng Nhơn Phú B, Quận 9, TPHCM.
This seminar-workshop was developed at the request of Ephesians Publishing Inc. for the Manila Central University teacher training series for elementary school and high school teachers. This was conducted on May 29, 2013.
This document provides an overview of the IELTS exam, including its various modules and sections. It describes the formats, timings, tasks, and assessment criteria for the Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking components of both the Academic and General Training modules. For the writing sections, it highlights some key differences between the Academic and General Training tasks and response expectations. It also provides sample questions, text types, and scoring bands for the various IELTS components.
Here are the steps in order:
1. The Interlocutor welcomes the candidates and checks their names.
b The Interlocutor introduces Part 2 and gives instructions to Candidate A.
c Candidate A speaks for 1 minute on their topic.
d The Interlocutor introduces Part 3 and gives instructions to the candidates.
e The candidates discuss their topic and answer the decision question.
f The Interlocutor introduces Part 1 and asks questions to the candidates.
g The Interlocutor thanks the candidates and ends the test.
h The Assessor and Interlocutor complete assessment forms.
i The Interlocutor introduces the Speaking test and checks the candidates are ready
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17Celine George
Custom modules offer the flexibility to extend Odoo's capabilities, address unique requirements, and optimize workflows to align seamlessly with your organization's processes. By leveraging custom modules, businesses can unlock greater efficiency, productivity, and innovation, empowering them to stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape. In this tutorial, we'll guide you step by step on how to easily download and install modules from the Odoo App Store.
BPSC-105 important questions for june term end exam
CEFR in EFL Classroom
1. Using CEFR in the EFL classroom
Mohamed Aboul Ela Abdel Mageed
mohamedaboulela1@gmail.com
2. Objectives
By the end of this presentation, attendees will be able to:
1. Understand each levels of the CEFR
2. Decide grammar areas to be taught at each level of CEFR
3. Assess learners in view of the CEFR
4. Give learners constructive feedback on their progress
3. The Common European Framework of Reference
for Languages (CEF or CEFR) was put together by
the Council of Europe as a way of standardising
the levels of language exams in different regions.
It is very widely used internationally, and all
important exams are mapped to the CEFR.
What is CEFR?
5. C2
Mastery
Description
The capacity to deal with material which is
academic or cognitively demanding, and to
use language to good effect at a level of
performance which may in certain respects be
more advanced than that of an average native
speaker.
Example
CAN scan texts for relevant information, and
grasp main topic of text, reading almost as
quickly as a native speaker.
• Cambridge English
Proficiency (CPE)
• IELTS 8.5-9
• Michigan ECPE
• PTE General Level 5
• PTE Academic 85+
6. C1
Effective Operational Proficiency
Description
The ability to communicate with the
emphasis on how well it is done, in
terms of appropriacy, sensitivity and the
capacity to deal with unfamiliar topics.
Example
CAN deal with hostile questioning
confidently. CAN get and hold onto
his/her turn to speak.
• Cambridge English
Advanced (CAE)
• BEC Higher
• IELTS 7-8
• TOEFL iBT 110-120
• TOEIC 880
• PTE General Level 4
• PTE Academic 76-84
7. B2
Vantage
Description
The capacity to achieve most goals
and express oneself on a range of
topics.
Example
CAN show visitors around and give
a detailed description of a place.
• Cambridge English First (FCE)
• BEC Vantage
• IELTS 5-6.5
• TOEFL iBT 87-109
• Michigan ECCE
• PTE General Level 3
• PTE Academic 59-75
• Trinity ISE II
8. B1
Threshold
Description
The ability to express oneself in
a limited way in familiar situations
and to deal in a general way with
non-routine information.
Example
CAN ask to open an account at
a bank, provided that the procedure
is straightforward.
• Cambridge English
Preliminary (PET)
• BEC Prelim
• IELTS 4-4.5
• TOEFL iBT 57-86
• TOEIC 550
• PTE General Level 2
• PTE Academic 43-58
• Trinity ISE I
9. A2
Way stage
Description
An ability to deal with simple,
straightforward information and
begin to express oneself in familiar
contexts.
Example
CAN take part in a routine
conversation on simple predictable
topics.
• Cambridge English Key (KET)
• PTE General Level 1
• PTE Academic 30-42
10. A1
Breakthrough
Description
A basic ability to communicate and exchange information
in a simple way.
Example
CAN ask simple questions about a menu and understand
simple answers.
12. A1
Adjectives: common and demonstrative
Adverbs of frequency
Comparatives and superlatives
Going to
How much/how many and very
common uncountable nouns
I’d like
Imperatives (+/-)
Intensifiers - very basic
Modals: can/can’t/could/couldn’t
Past simple of “to be”
Past Simple
Possessive adjectives
Possessive s
Prepositions, common
Prepositions of place
Prepositions of time, including in/on/at
Present continuous
Present simple
Pronouns: simple, personal
Questions
There is/are
To be, including question+negatives
Verb + ing: like/hate/love
13. A2Adjectives –comparative, – use of
than and definite article
Adjectives –superlative – use of definite article
Adverbial phrases of time, place and frequency – including word order
Adverbs of frequency
Articles – with countable and
uncountable nouns
Countables and Uncountables:
much/many
Future Time (will andgoing to)
Gerunds
Going to
Imperatives
Modals – can/could
Modals – have to
Modals – shouldPast continuous
Past simple
Phrasal verbs – common
Possessives – use of ‘s, s’
Prepositional phrases (place, time and movement)
Prepositions of time: on/in/at
Present continuous
Present continuous for future
Present perfect
Questions
Verb + ing/infinitive: like/
want-would like
Wh-questions in past
Zero and 1st conditional
14. B1
Adverbs
Broader range of intensifiers such
as too, enough
Comparatives andsuperlatives
Complex question tags
Conditionals, 2nd and3rd
Connecting words expressing
cause and effect, contrast etc.
Future continuous
Modals - must/can’t deduction
Modals – might, may, will, probably
Modals – should have/might have/etc
Modals: must/have to
Past continuous
Past perfect
Past simple
Past tense responses
Phrasal verbs, extended
Present perfect continuous
Present perfect/past simple
Reported speech(range of tenses)
Simple passive
Wh- questions in the past
Will and going to, for prediction
15. B2
Adjectives and adverbs
Future continuous
Future perfect
Future perfect continuous
Mixed conditionals
Modals – can’t have, needn’t have
Modals of deduction and speculation
Narrative tenses
Passives
Past perfect
Past perfect continuous
Phrasal verbs, extended
Relative clauses
Reported speech
Will and going to, for prediction
Wish
Would expressing habits, in the past
16. C1
Futures (revision)
Inversion with negative adverbials
Mixed conditionals in past, present
and future
Modals in the past
Narrative tenses for experience,
incl. passive
Passive forms, all
Phrasal verbs, especially splitting
Wish/if only regrets