Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
•
0 likes•500 views
This document summarizes key discussions from breakout groups at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting. The groups discussed how the 2018 Facilitative Dialogue can enhance climate action and provide predictability for investments by showcasing good practices and highlighting mitigation opportunities. They also noted that the modalities and format of the Facilitative Dialogue are important as they can influence outcomes by allowing for simple, focused, and dynamic discussions. A second group discussed upcoming discussions on new and updated NDCs and how the structure and timing of the Facilitative Dialogue process could affect the content agreed upon at COP24.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Breakout Group A and D summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
The document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting on accounting for nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Key points discussed include:
1) The purpose of mitigation accounting is to transparently explain and track progress towards greenhouse gas emission targets. Greenhouse gas inventories are the fundamental tool to do so consistently over time.
2) Issues to resolve include whether targets should be single- or multi-year, how to account for land use emissions, and how to handle NDCs with multiple targets.
3) Accounting guidance is needed before, during, and after NDC implementation to inform communication, track progress, and account for changes over time in things like business as usual projections
Breakout Group 4 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Non-party stakeholders such as sub-national governments, businesses, intergovernmental organizations, and non-governmental organizations could provide analysis on the status of climate change science, data, models, and policy and economic analysis by sector to inform the facilitative dialogue process. Their recommendations, highlighting of best practices and positive stories could help parties narrow emissions gaps and incentivize further climate action. While non-party stakeholders' information and actions are important, there was no agreement on their direct involvement in the facilitative dialogue process due to open questions around how their input would be determined and structured.
Breakout Group B and C summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
This document summarizes key discussions from a climate change expert group meeting regarding transparency of reporting on mitigation actions. The group discussed that countries base UNFCCC reporting on domestic systems not primarily designed for climate, and these systems may need changing to better reflect NDCs. There is varied experience reporting across countries, with current focus often on greenhouse gas inventories. Processes leading to improved reporting include domestic legal arrangements increasing information sharing and coordination across agencies, as well as peer review and analysis processes. The group also discussed that guidelines should focus on continuous improvement while acknowledging realities, and reporting of improvement plans by countries could help address challenges.
Breakout Group 2 and 3 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Reporting on climate finance provided and mobilized should distinguish between amounts provided and amounts mobilized from the private sector, with multilateral development banks collectively reporting private finance mobilized. Incremental changes like increased transparency around assumptions and methodologies could improve reporting. Reporting on climate finance received and needed is at an early stage but building on existing work and defining a minimum reporting format could help, and reporting on both received and needed finance could build capacity while highlighting domestic benefits.
Enhancing transparency lessons learned from capacity development, Rebecca Carman
This document summarizes lessons learned from a capacity development program to support climate change mitigation and transparency efforts in 38 countries. Key lessons include: (1) assigning climate relevance to financial flows and obtaining private sector data is challenging; (2) data availability and quality for transparency remains a fundamental issue; and (3) country-driven approaches that build on existing systems through engagement over time are most effective. The program delivered various outputs to support NDCs and transparency, but further targeted technical support is now needed for implementation.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017 Opening Plenary Investing in Climate, Invest...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017 Opening Plenary Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth by Simon Buckle
Transparency and national climate institutions reflections from the indian ex...
Transparency and national climate institutions reflections from the indian experience, Navroz Dubash
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group A and B summary slides
There are benefits to tracking national progress on climate change adaptation through monitoring and evaluation (M&E). M&E systems can facilitate mainstreaming adaptation efforts and prioritizing spending, though balancing standardized indicators with context is important. Tracking inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes provides information but can be data and resource intensive. The purpose of M&E should be learning rather than just indicators. Aggregating local and sub-national adaptation progress to the national and global level is challenging but not straightforward. Stakeholder buy-in and clear responsibilities are also critical for effective M&E.
Recommended
Breakout Group A and D summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
The document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting on accounting for nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Key points discussed include:
1) The purpose of mitigation accounting is to transparently explain and track progress towards greenhouse gas emission targets. Greenhouse gas inventories are the fundamental tool to do so consistently over time.
2) Issues to resolve include whether targets should be single- or multi-year, how to account for land use emissions, and how to handle NDCs with multiple targets.
3) Accounting guidance is needed before, during, and after NDC implementation to inform communication, track progress, and account for changes over time in things like business as usual projections
Breakout Group 4 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Non-party stakeholders such as sub-national governments, businesses, intergovernmental organizations, and non-governmental organizations could provide analysis on the status of climate change science, data, models, and policy and economic analysis by sector to inform the facilitative dialogue process. Their recommendations, highlighting of best practices and positive stories could help parties narrow emissions gaps and incentivize further climate action. While non-party stakeholders' information and actions are important, there was no agreement on their direct involvement in the facilitative dialogue process due to open questions around how their input would be determined and structured.
Breakout Group B and C summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
This document summarizes key discussions from a climate change expert group meeting regarding transparency of reporting on mitigation actions. The group discussed that countries base UNFCCC reporting on domestic systems not primarily designed for climate, and these systems may need changing to better reflect NDCs. There is varied experience reporting across countries, with current focus often on greenhouse gas inventories. Processes leading to improved reporting include domestic legal arrangements increasing information sharing and coordination across agencies, as well as peer review and analysis processes. The group also discussed that guidelines should focus on continuous improvement while acknowledging realities, and reporting of improvement plans by countries could help address challenges.
Breakout Group 2 and 3 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Reporting on climate finance provided and mobilized should distinguish between amounts provided and amounts mobilized from the private sector, with multilateral development banks collectively reporting private finance mobilized. Incremental changes like increased transparency around assumptions and methodologies could improve reporting. Reporting on climate finance received and needed is at an early stage but building on existing work and defining a minimum reporting format could help, and reporting on both received and needed finance could build capacity while highlighting domestic benefits.
Enhancing transparency lessons learned from capacity development, Rebecca Carman
This document summarizes lessons learned from a capacity development program to support climate change mitigation and transparency efforts in 38 countries. Key lessons include: (1) assigning climate relevance to financial flows and obtaining private sector data is challenging; (2) data availability and quality for transparency remains a fundamental issue; and (3) country-driven approaches that build on existing systems through engagement over time are most effective. The program delivered various outputs to support NDCs and transparency, but further targeted technical support is now needed for implementation.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017 Opening Plenary Investing in Climate, Invest...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017 Opening Plenary Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth by Simon Buckle
Transparency and national climate institutions reflections from the indian ex...
Transparency and national climate institutions reflections from the indian experience, Navroz Dubash
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group A and B summary slides
There are benefits to tracking national progress on climate change adaptation through monitoring and evaluation (M&E). M&E systems can facilitate mainstreaming adaptation efforts and prioritizing spending, though balancing standardized indicators with context is important. Tracking inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes provides information but can be data and resource intensive. The purpose of M&E should be learning rather than just indicators. Aggregating local and sub-national adaptation progress to the national and global level is challenging but not straightforward. Stakeholder buy-in and clear responsibilities are also critical for effective M&E.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group 3 and 4 summary slides
The document discusses communicating mitigation contributions and developing guidance on information for communicating transparency and understanding (CTU). It notes the challenge of balancing specificity with flexibility to update contributions over time. Options were discussed for managing this, such as supplementary annexes. Experience with communicating intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) was also helpful for development, though some elements of guidance could be improved for the post-Paris context. Developing CTU guidance should maintain consistency across guidance types while information categories evolve over time. CTU will need information on NDC features, and timing of applying different guidance needs detailed discussion.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group C and D summary slides
The document discusses information needs to assess progress towards the global goal on adaptation to climate change. It notes that the global adaptation goal still needs to be operationalized and clarified. Information will be needed at different levels but some, such as gender and mainstreaming data, will be difficult to collect and compare. Existing UNFCCC reporting vehicles are indispensable but need enhancement in content and periodicity. A minimum set of information to be reported should be defined. Assessing collective progress will require linking to other reporting frameworks and using existing third party information from regional, scientific, and issue-specific organizations. Determining effectiveness and adequacy of adaptation efforts also poses a challenge.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 Information needs of the 2018 facilitative dial...
The document discusses the information needs and challenges for the 2018 facilitative dialogue under the Paris Agreement. The two main objectives of the dialogue are to take stock of progress towards long-term climate goals and inform the preparation of new nationally determined contributions. Several components must be examined to fully address these objectives, but it is unclear if all will be treated explicitly. Challenges include non-comparable and incomplete data, but input from experts could help fill information gaps. The document outlines the dialogue's mandate and concludes that understanding information needs can help focus discussions.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Breakout Group E summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Climate Change Expert Group discussed key takeaways from their breakout group on capacity needs for transparency. They agreed that transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement should be opportunities, not burdens, and each country should identify domestic benefits to implementing their commitments. They also concluded that capacity building efforts need innovation through stronger connections between donor resources and developing country needs. An effective approach may be strengthening demand-driven, technical, peer-to-peer networks in the global south based on shared elements like language or culture.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...
This document discusses accounting issues related to countries' Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It notes that most current NDCs reference a "business as usual" scenario but does not define how this baseline is established. It also examines how countries may account for and report on their targets over time, considering things like base years, baseline emissions, reduction rates, and emission levels. It raises questions about how different target types like absolute, intensity and business as usual targets will be quantified and accounted for. It discusses the negotiations underway to develop guidance on accounting and suggests more clarity is needed on accounting for national targets and sectoral policies and measures.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 by Gu Zihua
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 - Information needed to take stock of the collective efforts of parties by Gu Zihua
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo
1) The document discusses countries' net-zero emissions targets and how to understand them. It analyzes countries' targets based on their sectoral coverage, governance mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, terminology, and timeframe.
2) While more countries setting net-zero targets is positive, the details and pathways to achieving the targets vary greatly between countries and need more clarity.
3) Translating long-term net-zero targets into near-term climate policies and plans, through mechanisms like NDCs, sector strategies, and low-emissions development plans, is important for implementation and assessing implications for the Paris Agreement's temperature goal.
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance...
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance lessons from GIZ experiences, Klaus Wenzel
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Alice Alpert
The document discusses preparations for the upcoming Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. So far, discussions among parties have focused mainly on logistics, but more thought needs to go into how to achieve the stated goal of informing parties on enhancing their climate actions and cooperation. Specifically, opportunities and examples of good practices should be highlighted to provide clear positive messages from parties' experiences. Additional considerations include managing the large volume of inputs, repeating themes in technical dialogues, and ensuring information moves beyond interactive sessions to inform parties.
CCXG Global Forum March 2017 Breakout group 1 and 2 summary slides
The document summarizes 5 key takeaways from a climate change expert group discussion on the 2018 facilitative dialogue. The group emphasized that the dialogue should focus on opportunities to increase climate action and ambition. They also felt the process should not be overloaded so as to confuse outcomes. While national climate plans may not provide full details, this should not limit the dialogue. Useful information is already available or forthcoming. Consideration should also be given to sequencing information and setting the 2018 process based on COP23 in 2017.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Key Takeaways
The document discusses key takeaways from a climate change expert group meeting on reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement, countries' net-zero emissions targets, the role of international carbon markets, and preparations for the Global Stocktake. Some of the main points discussed include needing further clarity in some Article 6 reporting provisions, opportunities to clarify details of reporting and review at COP26 and beyond, the importance of implementation plans and review processes for net-zero targets, and ensuring the Global Stocktake achieves its intended outcome of informing updated climate commitments and action.
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCX...
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCXG GF September 2016
Breakout A
CCXG, Forum, March 2020, Key Takeaways
The document summarizes key discussions from a virtual climate change forum. It addresses transparency issues around common reporting formats to track climate progress and links between Article 6 negotiations and reporting. It also discusses country experiences with updating NDCs, emphasizing ownership and coordination. Finally, it notes the importance of long-term climate strategies to drive short-term targets, and challenges posed by COVID-19 to climate processes.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating M...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating Mitigation NDCs by Joseph Viandrito
Designing and Implementing LCDS
The Sino-German Climate Partnership project aims to intensify cooperation between China and Germany on climate change issues. It provides technical support to the bilateral working group on climate change and facilitates expert exchanges through activities like training and dialogue. The project supports the development and implementation of low-carbon development strategies in both countries, with a focus on policy collaboration in areas like renewable energy and energy efficiency in buildings and transportation. It also helps China meet its 12th Five-Year Plan targets for reducing carbon intensity and increasing non-fossil fuel energy use by 2015. The project adopts a flexible, demand-driven approach to capacity building at the local and regional levels.
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An Introduction
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation: Issues and options for an enhanced framework by Sara Moarif
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of collective mitigation efforts by Helen Plume, notes
Capacity Building Programme on Climate Change: Programme Overview
This presentation was delivered as part of the "Developing Building Blocks of a Global Mitigation Architecture" workshop series.
CCXG global forum, April 2024, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo
The document discusses key considerations for countries in preparing their next Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) following the outcome of the first global stocktake (GST). NDCs are meant to represent increased ambition over time and be informed by the GST. The GST signals the need for more ambitious economy-wide emission reduction targets across all greenhouse gases and sectors. Translating the GST signals into enhanced NDCs requires aligning NDCs with long-term strategies and developing implementation plans and investment plans. Follow-up will be important to implement course corrections from the GST and keep the goals of the Paris Agreement achievable.
Global NDC Conference Report
The Global NDC Conference 2017:
integrated governance, finance and
transparency for delivering climate
goals took place in Berlin, Germany,
from 2-6 May 2017.
The conference was jointly organized by the GIZ Support
Project for the Implementation of the Paris Agreement
(SPA) and the UNDP Low Emission Capacity Building
(LECB) Programme for the IKI NDC Support Cluster,
and the Low Emission Development Strategies Global
Partnership (LEDS GP). More than 250 participants from
80 countries and several international organizations
shared their perspectives and experiences in the themes
covered by the conference. They exchanged good
practices and lessons on strategies for countries to
advance low carbon resilient development through the
implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions
(NDCs), built peer-networks, engaged with the private
sector and identified gaps and opportunities for support
to explore further action.
All conference material is available at
www.ndcconference2017.org.
More Related Content
What's hot
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group 3 and 4 summary slides
The document discusses communicating mitigation contributions and developing guidance on information for communicating transparency and understanding (CTU). It notes the challenge of balancing specificity with flexibility to update contributions over time. Options were discussed for managing this, such as supplementary annexes. Experience with communicating intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) was also helpful for development, though some elements of guidance could be improved for the post-Paris context. Developing CTU guidance should maintain consistency across guidance types while information categories evolve over time. CTU will need information on NDC features, and timing of applying different guidance needs detailed discussion.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group C and D summary slides
The document discusses information needs to assess progress towards the global goal on adaptation to climate change. It notes that the global adaptation goal still needs to be operationalized and clarified. Information will be needed at different levels but some, such as gender and mainstreaming data, will be difficult to collect and compare. Existing UNFCCC reporting vehicles are indispensable but need enhancement in content and periodicity. A minimum set of information to be reported should be defined. Assessing collective progress will require linking to other reporting frameworks and using existing third party information from regional, scientific, and issue-specific organizations. Determining effectiveness and adequacy of adaptation efforts also poses a challenge.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 Information needs of the 2018 facilitative dial...
The document discusses the information needs and challenges for the 2018 facilitative dialogue under the Paris Agreement. The two main objectives of the dialogue are to take stock of progress towards long-term climate goals and inform the preparation of new nationally determined contributions. Several components must be examined to fully address these objectives, but it is unclear if all will be treated explicitly. Challenges include non-comparable and incomplete data, but input from experts could help fill information gaps. The document outlines the dialogue's mandate and concludes that understanding information needs can help focus discussions.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Breakout Group E summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Climate Change Expert Group discussed key takeaways from their breakout group on capacity needs for transparency. They agreed that transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement should be opportunities, not burdens, and each country should identify domestic benefits to implementing their commitments. They also concluded that capacity building efforts need innovation through stronger connections between donor resources and developing country needs. An effective approach may be strengthening demand-driven, technical, peer-to-peer networks in the global south based on shared elements like language or culture.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...
This document discusses accounting issues related to countries' Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It notes that most current NDCs reference a "business as usual" scenario but does not define how this baseline is established. It also examines how countries may account for and report on their targets over time, considering things like base years, baseline emissions, reduction rates, and emission levels. It raises questions about how different target types like absolute, intensity and business as usual targets will be quantified and accounted for. It discusses the negotiations underway to develop guidance on accounting and suggests more clarity is needed on accounting for national targets and sectoral policies and measures.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 by Gu Zihua
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 - Information needed to take stock of the collective efforts of parties by Gu Zihua
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo
1) The document discusses countries' net-zero emissions targets and how to understand them. It analyzes countries' targets based on their sectoral coverage, governance mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, terminology, and timeframe.
2) While more countries setting net-zero targets is positive, the details and pathways to achieving the targets vary greatly between countries and need more clarity.
3) Translating long-term net-zero targets into near-term climate policies and plans, through mechanisms like NDCs, sector strategies, and low-emissions development plans, is important for implementation and assessing implications for the Paris Agreement's temperature goal.
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance...
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance lessons from GIZ experiences, Klaus Wenzel
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Alice Alpert
The document discusses preparations for the upcoming Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. So far, discussions among parties have focused mainly on logistics, but more thought needs to go into how to achieve the stated goal of informing parties on enhancing their climate actions and cooperation. Specifically, opportunities and examples of good practices should be highlighted to provide clear positive messages from parties' experiences. Additional considerations include managing the large volume of inputs, repeating themes in technical dialogues, and ensuring information moves beyond interactive sessions to inform parties.
CCXG Global Forum March 2017 Breakout group 1 and 2 summary slides
The document summarizes 5 key takeaways from a climate change expert group discussion on the 2018 facilitative dialogue. The group emphasized that the dialogue should focus on opportunities to increase climate action and ambition. They also felt the process should not be overloaded so as to confuse outcomes. While national climate plans may not provide full details, this should not limit the dialogue. Useful information is already available or forthcoming. Consideration should also be given to sequencing information and setting the 2018 process based on COP23 in 2017.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Key Takeaways
The document discusses key takeaways from a climate change expert group meeting on reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement, countries' net-zero emissions targets, the role of international carbon markets, and preparations for the Global Stocktake. Some of the main points discussed include needing further clarity in some Article 6 reporting provisions, opportunities to clarify details of reporting and review at COP26 and beyond, the importance of implementation plans and review processes for net-zero targets, and ensuring the Global Stocktake achieves its intended outcome of informing updated climate commitments and action.
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCX...
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCXG GF September 2016
Breakout A
CCXG, Forum, March 2020, Key Takeaways
The document summarizes key discussions from a virtual climate change forum. It addresses transparency issues around common reporting formats to track climate progress and links between Article 6 negotiations and reporting. It also discusses country experiences with updating NDCs, emphasizing ownership and coordination. Finally, it notes the importance of long-term climate strategies to drive short-term targets, and challenges posed by COVID-19 to climate processes.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating M...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating Mitigation NDCs by Joseph Viandrito
Designing and Implementing LCDS
The Sino-German Climate Partnership project aims to intensify cooperation between China and Germany on climate change issues. It provides technical support to the bilateral working group on climate change and facilitates expert exchanges through activities like training and dialogue. The project supports the development and implementation of low-carbon development strategies in both countries, with a focus on policy collaboration in areas like renewable energy and energy efficiency in buildings and transportation. It also helps China meet its 12th Five-Year Plan targets for reducing carbon intensity and increasing non-fossil fuel energy use by 2015. The project adopts a flexible, demand-driven approach to capacity building at the local and regional levels.
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An Introduction
Presentation by Anika Terton, IISD, at the Peer Learning Summit on "The role of the NAP process in NDC implementation" held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Oct 1-2. This Forum was co-hosted by Thailand's Office of National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) and the NAP Global Network.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation: Issues and options for an enhanced framework by Sara Moarif
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of collective mitigation efforts by Helen Plume, notes
Capacity Building Programme on Climate Change: Programme Overview
This presentation was delivered as part of the "Developing Building Blocks of a Global Mitigation Architecture" workshop series.
What's hot (20)
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group 3 and 4 summary slides
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group 3 and 4 summary slides
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group C and D summary slides
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 breakout group C and D summary slides
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 Information needs of the 2018 facilitative dial...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 Information needs of the 2018 facilitative dial...
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...
Breakout Group E summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
Breakout Group E summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 by Gu Zihua
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 Facilitative dialogue 2018 by Gu Zihua
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance...
Building institutions and capacity for transparency of mitigation and finance...
CCXG Global Forum March 2017 Breakout group 1 and 2 summary slides
CCXG Global Forum March 2017 Breakout group 1 and 2 summary slides
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCX...
Institutions and Capacity for Transparency of Finance, Syamsidar Thamrin, CCX...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating M...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG3 Indonesia NDC Experience in Communicating M...
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An Introduction
Alignment to Advance Climate-Resilient Development: An Introduction
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation...
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGC Transparency of reporting on mitigation...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG1 2018 Facilitative Dialogue: Taking stock of...
Capacity Building Programme on Climate Change: Programme Overview
Capacity Building Programme on Climate Change: Programme Overview
Similar to Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
CCXG global forum, April 2024, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo
The document discusses key considerations for countries in preparing their next Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) following the outcome of the first global stocktake (GST). NDCs are meant to represent increased ambition over time and be informed by the GST. The GST signals the need for more ambitious economy-wide emission reduction targets across all greenhouse gases and sectors. Translating the GST signals into enhanced NDCs requires aligning NDCs with long-term strategies and developing implementation plans and investment plans. Follow-up will be important to implement course corrections from the GST and keep the goals of the Paris Agreement achievable.
Global NDC Conference Report
The Global NDC Conference 2017:
integrated governance, finance and
transparency for delivering climate
goals took place in Berlin, Germany,
from 2-6 May 2017.
The conference was jointly organized by the GIZ Support
Project for the Implementation of the Paris Agreement
(SPA) and the UNDP Low Emission Capacity Building
(LECB) Programme for the IKI NDC Support Cluster,
and the Low Emission Development Strategies Global
Partnership (LEDS GP). More than 250 participants from
80 countries and several international organizations
shared their perspectives and experiences in the themes
covered by the conference. They exchanged good
practices and lessons on strategies for countries to
advance low carbon resilient development through the
implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions
(NDCs), built peer-networks, engaged with the private
sector and identified gaps and opportunities for support
to explore further action.
All conference material is available at
www.ndcconference2017.org.
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 2018 Facilitative dialogue by Harro van As...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 2018 Facilitative dialogue: Information needed to take stock of collective mitigation efforts under Article 4.1 by Harro van Asselt
CCXG Forum, March 2023, Sirini Jeudy-Hugo
The document discusses considerations for a successful outcome of the first global stocktake (GST1) under the Paris Agreement. It outlines the GST process and defines a successful outcome as one that informs national climate actions and enhances international cooperation. It argues a successful GST1 requires: 1) a well-designed consideration of outputs process, 2) a package of targeted technical and political outputs, and 3) follow-up processes to maintain momentum beyond 2023 towards implementing recommendations. The presentation concludes GST1 provides an opportunity to course correct climate actions if outputs translate technical discussions into strong recommendations and lessons learned.
CCXG Global Forum March 2015 - Breakout group 1- Summary Slide
This document discusses strategic reviews of nations' climate change mitigation contributions and the use of carbon markets. It notes that a strategic review process could enhance countries' climate ambitions over time. There is debate over whether reviews should focus on current or future commitments and whether recommendations should be prescriptive. The document also stresses the importance of enabling carbon markets in nations' climate plans to engage the private sector and ensure environmental integrity, while details can be determined later.
CCXG Global Forum 19 March 2015 Breakout Group 1 summary
This document discusses strategic reviews of nations' climate change mitigation contributions and the use of carbon markets. It notes that a strategic review process could enhance countries' climate ambitions over time. There is debate over whether reviews should focus on current or future commitments and whether recommendations should be prescriptive. The document also stresses the importance of enabling carbon markets in nations' climate plans to engage the private sector and ensure environmental integrity, while details can be determined later.
CCXG Forum, March 2023, Key takeaways
The document summarizes discussions from a climate change expert group forum on mitigation, climate finance, and the first global stocktake. Key points include: lessons need to be learned from past UNFCCC events to ensure mitigation work programme exchanges generate concrete results; focusing mitigation and investment events on specific topics could facilitate knowledge sharing and action; and the first global stocktake provides an opportunity to deliver a strong call to action, develop implementation tools, and establish review processes to maintain momentum on climate goals.
Research paper-nepal-s-position-paper-for-the-en-negotiations-cop15-by-shreed...
This research paper is a country representation paper for Nepal prepared on Climate change diplomacy talks. It deals with the major condition and climate change theories
Developing synergistic policy - Rebecca Nadin
This presentation explains the findings of a report written by INTASAVE for WWF: Lessons in Climate-Smart policies: A Framework For Integrated Low Carbon Resilient Development.
Climate finance kato(oecd) finance in 2015 agreement-ccxg gf sep2014
This document outlines a discussion on how the 2015 climate agreement could mobilize climate finance. It identifies four ways the agreement could contribute: 1) strengthening international institutional arrangements, 2) enhancing enabling environments in recipient countries, 3) supporting the use of a full range of financial instruments, and 4) elaborating and broadening measurement, reporting and verification systems. Specific options discussed for the agreement include encouraging coordination and information sharing, as well as addressing issues like definitions, tracking private finance, and building capacity for monitoring progress. The goal is for the agreement to indirectly facilitate scaling up climate finance through long-term shifts toward green financial flows.
Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies, Peter Janoska C...
Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies by Peter Janoska CCXG GF September 2016 Breakout 3
CCXG Forum, September 2023, Key takeaways
The document discusses key takeaways from a climate change expert group forum. It summarizes discussions on accelerating climate action through existing initiatives, delivering the mitigation work programme, establishing an annual decision on the MWP, tracking progress on climate finance goals, and lessons for a just transition work programme. The final section outlines elements for a successful first global stocktake, including recognizing gaps, responding with concrete actions, and generating ownership and political will.
CCXG October 2019 Breakout Group 1 - Part I, II & III summary
The document discusses a Climate Change Expert Group meeting focused on the challenges and opportunities of developing long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies (LT-LEDS). It notes that there are strong synergies between LT-LEDS and national climate pledges as the long-term vision of LT-LEDS can inform future pledges and back-casting from long-term goals can raise short-term ambition. It also states that developing LT-LEDS is an ongoing process that allows periodic reviews to incorporate new information and changing conditions, and that the process aims to include stakeholders across government agencies and society through co-creation.
NAP Training Viet Nam - Session 2 Conceptual Understanding of the NAP Process
The document provides an overview of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process. It discusses key aspects of the NAP including that it is country-driven, flexible, integrated into development planning, improves climate risk management, and involves learning and evaluation. The NAP aims to reduce vulnerability and mainstream climate adaptation. Support for the NAP comes from the UNFCCC, development partners, and various funding sources. The document compares the NAP to other national adaptation and planning processes in Vietnam and discusses how the NAP can help link adaptation priorities to development needs while building on existing work and efforts.
CCXG Forum, March 2023, Paula Sanmiguel
1. The document discusses guidelines and considerations for structuring the outcomes of the first Global Stocktake (GST1) under the Paris Agreement to maximize its impact.
2. It notes that the GST1 should inform parties by providing a science-based assessment of progress, hold parties accountable through its established review cycle, and guide and catalyze increased climate action.
3. The document suggests translating the GST1 findings into decisions that focus on a set of policy opportunities and levers for transformational change to close the ambition gap and achieve the Paris Agreement goals over the critical current decade and beyond. This would include a CMA decision, political declaration, and technical annex outlining specific sectoral actions.
Breakout B summary slides CCXG GF September 2016
Breakout B summary slides CCXG GF September 2016
Tracking the use, impact and estimated results of support received
CCXG Forum, September 2022, Lydie-Line Paroz
1) The document discusses modalities for a new Mitigation Work Programme established under the UNFCCC to urgently scale up climate change mitigation efforts this decade.
2) It proposes that the Work Programme include sectoral dialogues, ministerial roundtables, and accountability moments to advance ambition and implementation. Non-Party stakeholders would provide input to help direct investments and policy.
3) The Work Programme is intended to complement and inform the Global Stocktake process under the Paris Agreement by translating long-term goals into near-term action and feeding lessons back to the Stocktake.
Breakout 3 summary points CCXG GF September 2016
Breakout 3 summary points CCXG GF September 2016 Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Vicente Yu
1) The document outlines key questions to consider for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, including questions about collective progress on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, and capacity building.
2) It discusses assessing whether the goals of the Paris Agreement are being achieved, and identifying opportunities and challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations to strengthen climate action.
3) The document raises questions about how to ensure an integrated consideration of inputs across topics during the technical assessment and how to inform parties of outputs to enhance climate commitments and cooperation.
CCXG Forum, September 2023, Noura Alissa
The document discusses elements for a successful outcome of the first global stocktake (GST1) under the Paris Agreement at COP28. It explores what is needed to reach a robust outcome and concrete follow-up actions. Key elements identified include a balanced, party-driven process that comprehensively assesses progress across mitigation, adaptation, finance and other areas. The outcome should highlight opportunities and challenges, identify political messages to strengthen action, and inform updated climate commitments without being overly prescriptive. Follow-up is needed to ensure new climate pledges by 2030 and enhanced international cooperation on climate action.
Similar to Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017 (20)
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 2018 Facilitative dialogue by Harro van As...
CCCXG Global Forum March 2017 BG2 2018 Facilitative dialogue by Harro van As...
CCXG Global Forum March 2015 - Breakout group 1- Summary Slide
CCXG Global Forum March 2015 - Breakout group 1- Summary Slide
CCXG Global Forum 19 March 2015 Breakout Group 1 summary
CCXG Global Forum 19 March 2015 Breakout Group 1 summary
Research paper-nepal-s-position-paper-for-the-en-negotiations-cop15-by-shreed...
Research paper-nepal-s-position-paper-for-the-en-negotiations-cop15-by-shreed...
Climate finance kato(oecd) finance in 2015 agreement-ccxg gf sep2014
Climate finance kato(oecd) finance in 2015 agreement-ccxg gf sep2014
Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies, Peter Janoska C...
Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies, Peter Janoska C...
CCXG October 2019 Breakout Group 1 - Part I, II & III summary
CCXG October 2019 Breakout Group 1 - Part I, II & III summary
NAP Training Viet Nam - Session 2 Conceptual Understanding of the NAP Process
NAP Training Viet Nam - Session 2 Conceptual Understanding of the NAP Process
More from OECD Environment
PPTs - TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Su...
Presentations from the TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Supervisory Framework for Assessing Nature-related Financial Risks to the Hungarian financial sector, 7 June 2024.
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...
Water is critical for meeting commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our economies rely on water, with recent estimates putting the economic value of water and freshwater ecosystems at USD 58 trillion - equivalent to 60% of global GDP. At the same time, water related risks are increasing in frequency and scale in the context of climate change.
How are investments shaping our economies and societies exposure to water risk? What role can the financial system play in supporting water security? And how can increased understanding of how finance both impacts and depends on water resources spur action towards greater water security?
This OECD Green Talks LIVE on Tuesday 14 May 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00 CEST discussed the evolving landscape for assessing water risks to the financial system.
OECD Policy Analyst Lylah Davies presented key findings and recommendations from recent OECD work on assessing the financial materiality of water-related risks, including the recently published paper “Watered down? Investigating the financial materiality of water-related risks” and was joined by experts to discuss relevant initiatives underway.
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdf
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdf
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdf
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Laurent Drouet - Physical and Economic Risks of Climate Change.pdf
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Shinichiro Fujimori - Biodiversity modeling in AIM (Asia pacific Integrated M...
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
HyeJin Kim and Simon Smart - The biodiversity nexus across multiple drivers: ...
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
GREEN Action Task Force - Full Presentations.pdf
Presentations from the 2024 GREEN Action Task Force meeting held in the Republic of Moldova, 16-17 April 2024.
Case Study: Peptides-based Plant Protection Product (harpin proteins*) by Ros...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Additional Considerations for Pesticide Formulations Containing Microbial Pes...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Role of genome sequencing (WGS) in microbial biopesticides safety assessment ...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Considerations for Problem Formulation for Human Health Safety Assessments of...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
How to Identify and Quantify Mixtures What is Essential to Know for Risk Asse...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
APVMA outcome-focussed approach to data requirements to support registration ...
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
The U.S. Perspective on Problem Formulation for Biopesticides: Shannon BORGES
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
More from OECD Environment (20)
PPTs - TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Su...
PPTs - TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Su...
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdf
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdf
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdf
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdf
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdf
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdf
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...
Laurent Drouet - Physical and Economic Risks of Climate Change.pdf
Laurent Drouet - Physical and Economic Risks of Climate Change.pdf
Shinichiro Fujimori - Biodiversity modeling in AIM (Asia pacific Integrated M...
Shinichiro Fujimori - Biodiversity modeling in AIM (Asia pacific Integrated M...
HyeJin Kim and Simon Smart - The biodiversity nexus across multiple drivers: ...
HyeJin Kim and Simon Smart - The biodiversity nexus across multiple drivers: ...
Case Study: Peptides-based Plant Protection Product (harpin proteins*) by Ros...
Case Study: Peptides-based Plant Protection Product (harpin proteins*) by Ros...
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...
Additional Considerations for Pesticide Formulations Containing Microbial Pes...
Additional Considerations for Pesticide Formulations Containing Microbial Pes...
Role of genome sequencing (WGS) in microbial biopesticides safety assessment ...
Role of genome sequencing (WGS) in microbial biopesticides safety assessment ...
Considerations for Problem Formulation for Human Health Safety Assessments of...
Considerations for Problem Formulation for Human Health Safety Assessments of...
How to Identify and Quantify Mixtures What is Essential to Know for Risk Asse...
How to Identify and Quantify Mixtures What is Essential to Know for Risk Asse...
APVMA outcome-focussed approach to data requirements to support registration ...
APVMA outcome-focussed approach to data requirements to support registration ...
The U.S. Perspective on Problem Formulation for Biopesticides: Shannon BORGES
The U.S. Perspective on Problem Formulation for Biopesticides: Shannon BORGES
Recently uploaded
XP 2024 presentation: A New Look to Leadership
Presentation slides from XP2024 conference, Bolzano IT. The slides describe a new view to leadership and combines it with anthro-complexity (aka cynefin).
Using-Presentation-Software-to-the-Fullf.pptx
Slides on 7 Commonly Used Presentation Softwares; thier usage and features.
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – ČORBA – June 2024 OECD discus...
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – ČORBA – June 2024 OECD discus...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Carrer goals.pptx and their importance in real life
Career goals serve as a roadmap for individuals, guiding them toward achieving long-term professional aspirations and personal fulfillment. Establishing clear career goals enables professionals to focus their efforts on developing specific skills, gaining relevant experience, and making strategic decisions that align with their desired career trajectory. By setting both short-term and long-term objectives, individuals can systematically track their progress, make necessary adjustments, and stay motivated. Short-term goals often include acquiring new qualifications, mastering particular competencies, or securing a specific role, while long-term goals might encompass reaching executive positions, becoming industry experts, or launching entrepreneurial ventures.
Moreover, having well-defined career goals fosters a sense of purpose and direction, enhancing job satisfaction and overall productivity. It encourages continuous learning and adaptation, as professionals remain attuned to industry trends and evolving job market demands. Career goals also facilitate better time management and resource allocation, as individuals prioritize tasks and opportunities that advance their professional growth. In addition, articulating career goals can aid in networking and mentorship, as it allows individuals to communicate their aspirations clearly to potential mentors, colleagues, and employers, thereby opening doors to valuable guidance and support. Ultimately, career goals are integral to personal and professional development, driving individuals toward sustained success and fulfillment in their chosen fields.
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussionOECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – ROBSON – June 202...
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – ROBSON – June 202...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Professor Alex Robson, Deputy Chair of Australia’s Productivity Commission, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie Wells
Insight: In a landscape where traditional narrative structures are giving way to fragmented and non-linear forms of storytelling, there lies immense potential for creativity and exploration.
'Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity' is a micro report from Rosie Wells.
Rosie Wells is an Arts & Cultural Strategist uniquely positioned at the intersection of grassroots and mainstream storytelling.
Their work is focused on developing meaningful and lasting connections that can drive social change.
Please download this presentation to enjoy the hyperlinks!
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – OECD – June 2024 ...
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – OECD – June 2024 ...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
The remarkable life of Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya.pptx
The remarkable life of Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya.pptx
BRIC_2024_2024-06-06-11:30-haunschild_archival_version.pdf
These are the slides of my presentation at BRIC 2024 about global science overlay maps using OpenAlex.
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – COLANGELO – June 2024...
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – COLANGELO – June 2024...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Professor Giuseppe Colangelo, Jean Monnet Professor of European Innovation Policy, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussionOECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
2024-05-30_meetup_devops_aix-marseille.pdf
Slides de notre meetup DevOps AixMarseille du 30 mai 2024 chez SmarTribune
Sujets: platform engineering / terragrunt / test containers
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – CAPEL – June 2024 OEC...
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – CAPEL – June 2024 OEC...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Tim Capel, Director of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office Legal Service, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – LANE – June 2024 OECD discussion
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – LANE – June 2024 OECD discussionOECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Disaster Management project for holidays homework and other uses
It talks about disaster management in a helful way.
IEEE CIS Webinar Sustainable futures.pdf
The importance of sustainable and efficient computational practices in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning has become increasingly critical. This webinar focuses on the intersection of sustainability and AI, highlighting the significance of energy-efficient deep learning, innovative randomization techniques in neural networks, the potential of reservoir computing, and the cutting-edge realm of neuromorphic computing. This webinar aims to connect theoretical knowledge with practical applications and provide insights into how these innovative approaches can lead to more robust, efficient, and environmentally conscious AI systems.
Webinar Speaker: Prof. Claudio Gallicchio, Assistant Professor, University of Pisa
Claudio Gallicchio is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Pisa, Italy. His research involves merging concepts from Deep Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Randomized Neural Systems, and he has co-authored over 100 scientific publications on the subject. He is the founder of the IEEE CIS Task Force on Reservoir Computing, and the co-founder and chair of the IEEE Task Force on Randomization-based Neural Networks and Learning Systems. He is an associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS).
Suzanne Lagerweij - Influence Without Power - Why Empathy is Your Best Friend...
This is a workshop about communication and collaboration. We will experience how we can analyze the reasons for resistance to change (exercise 1) and practice how to improve our conversation style and be more in control and effective in the way we communicate (exercise 2).
This session will use Dave Gray’s Empathy Mapping, Argyris’ Ladder of Inference and The Four Rs from Agile Conversations (Squirrel and Fredrick).
Abstract:
Let’s talk about powerful conversations! We all know how to lead a constructive conversation, right? Then why is it so difficult to have those conversations with people at work, especially those in powerful positions that show resistance to change?
Learning to control and direct conversations takes understanding and practice.
We can combine our innate empathy with our analytical skills to gain a deeper understanding of complex situations at work. Join this session to learn how to prepare for difficult conversations and how to improve our agile conversations in order to be more influential without power. We will use Dave Gray’s Empathy Mapping, Argyris’ Ladder of Inference and The Four Rs from Agile Conversations (Squirrel and Fredrick).
In the session you will experience how preparing and reflecting on your conversation can help you be more influential at work. You will learn how to communicate more effectively with the people needed to achieve positive change. You will leave with a self-revised version of a difficult conversation and a practical model to use when you get back to work.
Come learn more on how to become a real influencer!
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – SCHREPEL – June 2024 OECD dis...
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – SCHREPEL – June 2024 OECD dis...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Recently uploaded (20)
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – ČORBA – June 2024 OECD discus...
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – ČORBA – June 2024 OECD discus...
Carrer goals.pptx and their importance in real life
Carrer goals.pptx and their importance in real life
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – ROBSON – June 202...
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – ROBSON – June 202...
Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie Wells
Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie Wells
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – OECD – June 2024 ...
Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations – OECD – June 2024 ...
The remarkable life of Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya.pptx
The remarkable life of Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya.pptx
BRIC_2024_2024-06-06-11:30-haunschild_archival_version.pdf
BRIC_2024_2024-06-06-11:30-haunschild_archival_version.pdf
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – COLANGELO – June 2024...
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – COLANGELO – June 2024...
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – OECD – June 2024 OECD discussion
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – CAPEL – June 2024 OEC...
The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy – CAPEL – June 2024 OEC...
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – LANE – June 2024 OECD discussion
Pro-competitive Industrial Policy – LANE – June 2024 OECD discussion
Disaster Management project for holidays homework and other uses
Disaster Management project for holidays homework and other uses
Suzanne Lagerweij - Influence Without Power - Why Empathy is Your Best Friend...
Suzanne Lagerweij - Influence Without Power - Why Empathy is Your Best Friend...
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – SCHREPEL – June 2024 OECD dis...
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – SCHREPEL – June 2024 OECD dis...
Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017
- 1. Climate Change Expert Group www.oecd.org/env/cc/ccxg.htm Facilitative dialogue: Key takeaways Co-facilitators: Ilze Prūze and Kaveh Guilanpour CCXG GFE 13 September 2017
- 2. 2 Climate Change Expert Group Breakout group 1: Outputs and outcomes Outputs from FD 2018 should enable it to achieve its outcomes o E.g. enhance political momentum and provide clarity on long-term climate action & predictability for investments o inspire action, influence decision-makers How can we ramp up action? o Showcase good practice, lessons learned o Highlight mitigation opportunities (technical) Modalities & format of FD important, influence possible outcomes o Need simplicity, focus, dynamic discussions, speak to all stakeholders in their language
- 3. 3 Climate Change Expert Group Breakout group 5: Where to next? Discussions on new/updated NDCs o E.g. increased ambition, increased information, and/or technical clarifications o Different implications for, and tensions between, NDCs to 2025 & 2030 Structure/timing of FD process will affect its influence on content of CTU package at COP24 What happens between COP24 and new/updated NDCs in 2020?