Individual Freedoms Limited by Ethnicity and Religion

Brave New World and Individual Freedom
The Motto of the World State is Community, Identity, Stability.
With detailed reference to the novel, how do you view this in relation to individual freedom?
"Community, Identity, Stability."–– The motto that shapes and defines the entire civilized world. Civilians like Lenina believe that the motto has
given them their individual freedom. "I am free. Free to have the most wonderful time. Everybody's happy nowadays." (Page 79) Ironically, Huxley
was trying to convey the exact opposite message. The motto really speaks of a heavy price paid –– freedom in exchange for collective happiness.
Freedom to feel, freedom of identity, and the freedom to know and create. It is too heavy a price, perhaps, because freedom is never dear at any ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly all family relations must be completely abolished. People no longer know what monogamy, romance, families and mothers are, and along
with that, stripped of the right to practice them. Then there is the use of soma. As Mustapha Mond exclaims, you can now carry half your morals
around in a bottle, because the slightest bouts of any negative emotions can be instantly cured by the drug. Like ostriches the whole civilized world
choose to bury themselves in their soma holiday in face of the tiniest adversity. Living in that bubble of false happiness, they have lost all ability and
freedom to have emotions. John the Savage believes that being happy all the time is a prison on its own, and he claims the "right to be unhappy".
After all, being a human, even at its most abject and abased state, is about the right to feel, to love and to hate.
The citizens of the World Statehave also lost their right to know and to create. They are all intellectually degraded, even for an Alpha Plus. Watsons
himself, the most distinguished Emotional Engineer admits that the hypnopaedic lines he writes are "idiotic, writing when there's nothing to say".
(Page 194) Mustapha Mond explains the reason why they couldn't afford to have people becoming too intellectual. After centuries of war, famine,
poverty, diseases, heartbreaks and chaos, one day The Ford came along and decided that it is too hard
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Individual Freedom In To Kill A Mockingbird
Individual Freedoms are Limited by one's Ethnicity
" You never understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... until you climb into his skin and walk around in it" ( Atticus Finch,
TKAM). There are two characters that come to mind when thinking of this theme. Elie Weisel the main character from the novel Night a horrendous
first person point of view from the Holocaust and Tom Robinson a black man falsely accused because of his race from To Kill A Mockingbird. Both of
these people are quickly judged because of their race/ religion. In conclusion, both of these characters demonstrate that individual freedoms are
limited by one's ethnicity. Individual freedoms are limited in Harper Lee's novel through Tom Robinson. He is judged and accused of a major
crime because of his skin color. In the 1930's African americans were discriminated against for no apparent reason except they had darker skin " she
was white , and she tempered a black man she did something in our society is unspeakable she kissed a black man " (Lee 272). Maycomb the small
town which Tom lives in is very prejudice towards other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The holocaust was a mass killing of Jews because they were Jewish. Hitler ordered jews out of their homes and forced them to concentration
camps where they were left to die our main character Ellie was part of this. Ellie was forced out of his house into a ghetto and then sent on his
journey to Auschwitz where he and many other Jews were supposed to die. Ellie unlike many Jews survived the concentration camp and lived until
2016 " god knows what I would have given to be able to sleep a few moments but deep inside, I knew to sleep meant to die and something inside me
rebelled against death" (Weisel 89). Jews were seen differently because they believed what Hitler did not and we are all entitled to our own opinion and
to be murdered because of it individual freedom is limited by jews

A Separation of Church and State Ensures our Individual...
Religion has no place in politics, therefore, church and state must remain separate if we are to preserve our individual freedoms. The United States of
America is a land of great diversity and a nation built on equality. In order to explore religion and politics in America, we must first begin with our
country's roots in 17th century Europe. At the time there was heavy conflict, over religion, involving the Catholics and the Protestants of England.
They were two different religions, but they shared a common belief. Both shared the principle that there should be one religion, everyone should be
forced to follow it, and that government should enforce it. Therein lay the problem, how can there be only one religion when there are... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some states even had official state supported churches. All was still not equal when it came to religion. So how then were we any different than
England? We were no different, pure and simple. The right to to worship as you choose was lacking, and thereligious persecution had followed our
citizens across the "pond".
Religion was such a hot button that a person could be executed for following the wrong one, depending on your geographical location in the
colonies. Violence was not in short supply, as religious differences led to much bloodshed. Definitely not the sunshine lollipops and rainbows
version of our nation's history, as it is painted for us in primary school. In New York City, on July 12, 1871, violence erupted between Catholics
and Protestants. It lead to the death of 62 colonists, and another 100 were injured. Theses riots, the Orange Riots, were a prime example of how little
progress we had made toward religious freedom in the colonies. What subject could lead to such violence? Why it was all about the Bible in Public
Schools, of course. Colonists were discriminated against, tortured and executed all under the umbrella of religious differences. Aside from the
violence, religion elicited in colonial times, civil rights were also not what they are today. Laws were passed over the next several decades, to prevent
Catholics from owning anything, worshiping, and educating their young. We were an intolerant group, it would seem,

External Boundaries
Every individual has their own boundaries. These external boundaries allow people to know their limitations on other individual. It allows a person to
know until where can an individual push things and not hurt another person. However, when an individual imposed their own boundaries to another
person, it makes an individual feel like he/she lacks his/her own independence. Although, sometimes the way we act towards these boundaries depend
on how we view it. In the poem "I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings" by Maya Angelou, and the biblical story "The Prodigal Son", both characters
demonstrates the impact of their external boundaries on their actions to find and feel the freedom that was exploited from them. However, in my own
experience external ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the poem "I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings" by Maya Angelou, the poem demonstrated a sample of external boundary being imposed on an
individual. For instance, a line in the poem states, "his wings are clipped and his feet are tied." The bird in a cage can be assumed that it is a
metaphor of a person dealing with external boundaries. This individual feels like he is imprisoned by someone else's boundaries and he is unable
to do anything about it. "So he opens his throat to sing." This line shows how the bird persevered to get out of his current condition, but no matter
how much he tried no one was able to help him. Due to the fact that he sings he fearful trill. The outcome of his action made the bird feel impotent
because nothing happened to him. Additionally, when an individual believe that he is powerless, it makes him feel like he is living in a sorrowful
life. "His shadow shouts on a nightmare scream." This line demonstrates that the bird is feeling miserable and remorseful because he cannot change
anything about his current situation. This section also shows how the bird feels scared because the line states how he is screaming in a nightmare.
Therefore, having a boundary that is being imposed on an individual makes this person feel like his freedom is lacking and makes a person feel like he
has an unfortunate

Individual Freedoms During The Enlightenment
In the 17th and 18th Century, a new age erupted in Europe that shaped the world and it's ideas to this day, called the Enlightenment Period or the Age
of Reason. During the Enlightenment Period, hundreds of individual ideas were expressed between philosophers as well as the citizens of England and
France. Interestingly enough, most of these ideas seemed to share one central theme together. This theme was around individual freedoms that people
can and should have, and the natural rights they should also hold. In these discussions of individual freedoms, sprouted innovative ideas regarding
politics, economics, religion, and social rights.
During the Enlightenment, it was not uncommon to see interesting new ideas that would change a certain ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many have come a long way and used the philosopher's standards as national rights, such as Wollstonecraft's social construct of the sexes having equal
opportunity at an education, or Voltaire's thoughts about having the freedom to balance multiple religions in one society at the same time. Even
though all of these ideas have very broad differences, they all tie in to one subject, to one key point. This key point is indeed that of an individual's
rights and freedoms, which no one should be able to take from said individual. This is what set the Enlightenment Period, the Age of Reason, so unique
and above all other revolutions in Europe, no matter how

The Importance Of Government Regulation On Individual Freedom
Milton Freidman and Rose Freidman were two economists who met in Chicago, were married in 1938, and continued their careers together as
economists. The two of them firmly held the belief that any government regulation was an infringement on individual freedom. Freidman and
Freidman's minor thesis is that the government in a free society should be entirely limited to the following areas: enforcing law and order, preventing
coercion of one individual by another, enforcing legally binding contracts and rights of private property owners, and providing resources for the
defense and the monetary system. They construct their assertion of government regulation being an infringement on individual rights by generously
providing a multitude of arguments in favor of their political view. They commence by first stating that economic freedom, the freedom consumers
possess to buy and sell whatever they so choose, is a "component of freedom properly understood," (p. 220) and therefore to alter it is to place a curb
on freedom. For example, if the government comes to a decision to pass a law placing a quota on a manufactured good that consumers would have the
aspiration to purchase but are incapable of procuring enough money to purchase said product because its price has been altered to become prohibitive,
the freedom of the individual is henceforth imposed upon. Similarly, if the government forces people to use the government–provided postal service,
then my freedom to set up a competitive business in competition with the government service is curtailed. I only partially agree with this political
view. The government should actively attempt to interfere as little as possible, but not to the extent Freidman and Freidman argue. Countries should
have a free market but also set price caps to forestall price gouging like during Hurricane Irma. In order to protect the people, the people themselves
have to sacrifice a certain amount of freedom. It is up to the people to decide how much. For example, if we gave up every shred up freedom to the
government and the government protected us by never allowing us the privilege of exiting our homes, a dramatic reduction in murders and robberies
would take place, but we would not

Freedom Is A Fundamental Right Of Individual Autonomy
Freedom of expression has become one of the most valued features of a free and democratic society. Freedom of speech and expression are a set of
valued rights that allow citizens to openly debate, political issues, political leaders, and government policies. Free flow of information is evidence of
a healthy democracy. Therefore, freedom is a fundamental right of individual autonomy. However, it is very important to show contrast that there is a
vast difference between the allowance of freedom of expression in in Canada, compared to free speech in the United States, where all forms freedom
of speech is protected under the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. (Tarnopolsky 1983) However, under the 1982Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms under Section 2b, it states that "Everyone has the right to the following fundamental freedoms... thought, belief, opinion and expression,
including freedom of the press and other media communication." (Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 2b) While section 2b is
guaranteed to protect freedom of expression, it is subject to Section 1, which states that all Charter rights can be struck down within reasonable limits.
The Oakes Test has been an important tool that has been used to determine whether the proportionality and rational of invoking Section 1 was done
under a justifiable and positive measures that outweigh the negatives. In this essay I examine R v. Keegstra, R v. Zundel, R v. Whatcott, R v. Sharpe
and R v. Butler. It

An Individual 's Identity Is Shaped By Many Aspects Of...
An individual's identity is shaped by many aspects of their life, but the ones where they either experienced hardship or were oppressed are the most
prominent in defining their identity. Individuals who identify as LGBTQ often have to deal with issues of inequality in their everyday lives, because
the dominant group, straight individuals, create an environment where others feel oppressed. In many situations the dominant group feels as though
anyone not like them needs to change, and because they believe sexual orientation is a choice, they should just be straight. The importance of
maintaining individual freedom, even when laws that oppress people and discrimination is very prevalent, ultimately allows people to feel free. Many
aspects of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While he was talking about race, the argument still applies to sexuality, and necause LGBTQ individuals had to endure this injustice it was not only
their privilege, but their right to take action against it. Taking this initiative to create an equal society was best accomplished through nonviolent
resistance. Martin Luther King Jr., a large proponent of nonviolent campaigns, writes about how there are four basic steps in creating a campaign. First
the collection of the facts to determine whether injustice exists, which in this case it does based on the definition of an unjust law. Next,
self–purification, this is having the confidence to unwaveringly believe in a cause and not stray from non–violence resistance. Third direct action
which is used to create enough tension in the community so that something happens, in this case causing friction between the government and LGBTQ
individuals. Finally, negotiation, where people worked with the government to change the law so that LGBTQ individuals have the right to get
married. While, this does not have an affect on societal view it at least makes individuals freedoms legal. Martin Luther King Jr., believe in talking the
initiative to challenge unjust laws that revoke personal freedom and accepted all sorts of punishment, from the dominant group, for it. This was similar
to what LGBTQ individuals were willing to do for equality, but with regards to sexual orientation not race. Individual expression is another way that the

Public Health Over Individual Freedom Research Paper
Public Health Over Individual Freedom
With health risks on the rise, and people getting careless, a change needs to take place. Our society is built upon freedom, but in some cases that
freedom needs to be restricted. A simple choice throughout someone's day can affect the health of everyone around them. Even though freedom is one
of the most important things in life, the public health has a wide outcome that could affect the rest of the world. Public health should be put before
freedom because it affects more than one person, determines the generations to come, and this is what laws are based upon..
To begin with, freedom can affect more than one person. Being healthy is a freedom that most people tend to clench on to.Smoking or drinking is
another. But what happens if a smoker wants to have a cigarette around all of the others? Some believe it is that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Millions would speed and not follow the law in various ways. This affects everyone around them. Public safety laws are in effect for a reason, and they
are based upon keeping the mass of society healthy. Putting others health before individual freedom shows the integrity in humans. This shows that
they know the right thing to do and why doing some actions is wrong.
In the long run, putting health before freedom saves many lives other than making one happy. Along with that, it determines what the generations
ahead will be like and makes the outcome predictable. Finally, public safety laws are in effect for a reason and this helps the mass population stay
healthy. There are many reasons why putting public health before individual freedom is important and these are just a few to think about. Public safety
is important because it affects more than one person, determines the next generation, and helps public safety laws stay in

Individual Freedom Is Often Seen As The Core Value Of...
Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of Liberalism. Nevertheless, freedom can be divided into two categories: negative and positive.
Negative freedom, which is traditionally associated with Classical Liberalism, advocates the belief in non–interference and the absence of all external
constraints upon the individual. This absence of limits implies that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests, free from outside
restrictions or pressures. Negative freedom, however does not mean that individuals should have absolute and unrestricted freedom. Classical liberals,
such as J.S. Mill, believe that if freedom is Unlimited, it can lead to "license", namely the right to harm others or to infringe upon their personal... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They have to either start completely over or go back to where they began. To be free, a person can do what they want with no interference from
anyone else, but there has to be limitations on freedom in a country and government. Berlin states "You lack political liberty or freedom only if you
are prevented from attaining a goal by human beings. Mere incapacity to attain a goal is not lack of political freedom." Positive liberty may be
understood as self–mastery, and includes one 's having a role in choosing who governs the society of which one is a part. Berlin argued, the liberty in
choosing their government granted to citizens, and extolled, most famously, by Pericles. Berlin granted that both concepts of liberty represent valid
human ideals, and that both forms of liberty are necessary in any free and civilised society. Smith argued that the government should intervene as little
as possible into business. He saw that when wealthy corporations, as commonly happened, wrested tax incentives, monopolies, and other unfair
advantages from governments, this impeded free trade and competition. Because a few companies received special favors, they did not need to run
efficiently, and their unfair advantages discouraged other companies from competing with them. I feel that this is completely unfair for the other

State Of Nature, Reciprocal Equality For Individual Rights...
When Locke wrote his Two Treaties of Government he was under the employment or had the Earl of Shaftesbury which ended up giving the
philosophical ammo to the founding fathers to give the shaft to England after we won the Revolutionary War. Locke disagreed with and argued that
a legitimate king would have their sovereign powers and duties endowed to them by God. Locke also introduced three important ideas, State of
Nature, reciprocal equality for individual rights balanced with individual freedom duties which I will call responsibilities and third the idea that
these laws arise from and are formed or shaped to us by the laws of nature. Locke's philosophy had an intense and direct deterministic impact on the
language used by the founding fathers. While it took Locke several thousands of words to detail his meaning, the founding fathers seemed to have
distilled it into five sentences, 202 words. He believed that no one should have power over someone else, "there being nothing more evident, that
creatures of the same species and rank... should be able to use the same facilities, should also be equal amongst another without Subjection or
Subordination." He goes on to speak to how with his principals "There must be no taxation without representation by consent" It is striking how much
that sounds like the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all Men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain

Transgression Of The Truth By Ayn Rand 's Anthem, And The...
Transgression of the Truth
Self is a person's identity, character, and personality. Self differentiates a person from a population by creating the individual through soul, spirit, and
state of mind. Self is the basis of humanity. In Ayn Rand's Anthem, by the laws of a government based on bettering your brothers (21), the concept of
solitude is closely related to ego; an idea so horrid the word is declared unspeakable (49, 105), and the freedom of individual thought is denied (22).
Rand traps her characters in a totalitarian society of primitive technology to showcase that viewing society as one results in the failure to embrace
individualism. This causes a lack of awareness as the primary focus of people is to replicate the norm rather than to strive for their own success.
Technological progress is established via unique ideas of a single being––like Equality––because the crowd of dependent people has neither the capable
thought process nor courage to stand out. A stunted society results from undeveloped individuals. The primitive conditions throughout Anthem are
displayed through incorrect teachings (23), and due to the fact that the development of the most recent discoveries take place a century prior (24); the
stagnation is caused by ignorance of the environment. This is demonstrated when The Council of Scholars dismisses Equality's thoughts as he ponders
the "mysteries in the sky" (23) by simply denying the possibility. Equality did not question the Council's response

Adam Truman Individual Freedom
The act of possessing individual freedom and not conforming is an American ideal. American Ideal of Individual freedom is exemplified by
"Fashion" by Anna Cora Mowatt, "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave" by Frederick Douglass, Zitkala–Sa's autobiography,
and The Awakening by Kate Chopin.
The play "Fashion" presents the very definition of individuality fighting conformity by the character Adam Truman. Adam Truman as a whole
character is based on honesty, integrity, and hard work. These traits translate into a great spokesperson for individual freedom. Truman exhibits great
bouts of anger and violence towards those around him acting based off of immoral motives and this continues to show that this man acts based off
only himself and what he deems to be the correct way, further pushing his individual freedom to the net level. He is not held to the social standard of
politeness and other norms when interacting with other people. When Ms. Tiffany keeps bringing up what is and what is not in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Truman's character is seen in many other works of American writing. J. Hector St. John the CrГЁvecoeur states,"Here the rewards of his industry
follow with equal steps the progress of his labour; his labour is founded on the basis of nature, self interest; can it want a stronger allurement?"(de
Crevecoeur, 109). The American ideal of individuality is rooted in self reliance. If a person cannot take care of themselves, they do not have the
qualifications to be recognized as an individual. Ralph Waldo Emersonalso writes about the problems regarding individual freedom."The virtue in most
request is conformity. Self–reliance is its aversion" (Emerson). This challenge of conformity is a threat of controversy across the American identity.
Conformity is in direct conflict with personal independence for Emerson. This does not allow for any conformity to happen, Mr. Truman is an
excellent example of not conforming and being an individual above all

The Freedom Of The Individual
Enhance the Freedom of the Individual
I think liberalism sets out the best way to organize society. The liberal ideology originated from intellectuals who had an appreciation for the unique
qualities different humans possess. Liberalism promoted that in a satisfactory society, everyone would have the opportunity to express their musical,
mental, athletic ability or any other talent they had, to it's fullest potential. In terms of liberalism, this removes the factor of being told what to do or
how to act, requiring full responsibility upon ones actions (Shively p. 29). These are the strengths of liberalism because the individuals of a society
are the initial instigators of the ideology showing the promise for success due to demand. Another reason why liberalism is the best way to organize
a society is the acquired responsibility of one's actions, allowing for growth due to feeling the consequences of those actions. All in all, the society as a
whole would benefit from the ability to grow and learn from their mistakes. Although other ideologies such as, conservatives, communitarians and
Marxist, raise valid objections to my claim, I believe the liberal ideology holds the most promise to a structured society.
Conservatism emphasizes the importance of a society progressing as a group for greater happiness, rather than what they could accomplish
individually. Therefore, a conservative could readily argue that liberalism is an unfulfilling life with lack of connection and

The Principles Of Individual Responsibility And Freedom
Governments across the world manipulate their subjects into believing that the only way they can survive is through the government. The ideas of life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are what this country was founded upon. At that time of our founding fathers in 1776, the people controlled the
government. In our day and age, the government controls the people by manipulation and convincing citizens that mandatory taxation is charitable,
when the very definition of charity states that charity is voluntary and heartfelt, not forced and done out of fear of retaliation. When it comes down to
it, the government has too much power over the people; telling them that they cannot succeed except under a collective authority instead of being
individually motivated and driven to succeed by the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. On July 4, 1776, a new nation was
formed: The United States of America. The principles of individual responsibility and freedom were brought into full swing. The founding fathers
wrote the Declaration of Independence; one that will forever stand as an example for all nations who have ever sought, and will seek independence
from an unethical or forceful regime. "We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.––That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among

The Principles Of Freedom Of An Individual
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
The principle of freedom of an individual is the core tenet of liberalism. The foundation of liberalism is categorized into three. The first is the freedom
from arbitrary rule, termed "negative freedom" which includes freedom of the press, equality before the law, freedom of conscience and right to
property. The second set of rights ensures the protection and promotion of the capacity and opportunity for freedom, which is called the "positive
freedom." Example of such rights are the social and economic rights to health care, education, gainful employment, for human dignity and participation
in the society. Thirdly, political rights of democratic representation or participation i.e., right to vote or be voted for to ensure that the other two rights
are not infringed on (Kant & Political Philosophy, 1993. p. 173).
Liberalism today could slightly be different with earlier views as a result of changes in time and history however the fundamental tent of liberty and
the ideals of freedom, equality, independence as expressed by Kant remains the same and paramount. Several philosophical views regarding modern
political thought on state of nature, social contract and division of powers has immensely been written by both Locke and Kant in their era.
REFERENCES
CHAPTER TWO
MAIN BODY
The philosopher emmanuel kant: introduction to profound political thought
He was an eighteenth–century philosopher during a period dominated by the ideas of the

Individualism or Collectivism in Society Essay
Debate Question: Which ideological group has had the greatest impact on modern society? Individualism or Collectivism. Terms: Individualism–>
when you value the freedom and worth of the individual, sometimes over the security and harmony of the group or a belief in the importance of the
individual and the virtue of self–reliance and personal independence
Collectivism–> is basically when you think that values and the goals of the group and the common good over the goals of any one individual are the
most beneficial. It stresses human interdependence and the importance of a collective, rather than the importance of separate individuals
Ideological–> the way we view the world and other people through our beliefs and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If we all work together to help people out we can get a lot of ideas put together and do a lot of good for the group. In Canada we are a mostly
collective country especially next to the states. We have universal health care which widely helps out people who wouldn't otherwise be able to see a
doctor or dentist without it.
If the government helps people out then the standard of living would increase. Poverty could be diminished, health problems could be cured, and
people would be able to afford leisurely activities putting money back into the government to help others out. Health care would be free and
widely available to all to use. No having to pay for expensive prescriptions and doctors visits cutting back on the spread of diseases and sick people.
Public property is used and is managed by a collective to benefit everyone in the community. All kids can go to school no matter their parents
financial state giving them a chance to finish and go on to post secondary and get a good paying job. In Saudi Arabia and Sweden schooling is
paid for by the government from kindergarten all the way to post secondary education. It benefits everyone because everyone can go to school
regardless of their wealth. It inspires people to get a good education and a good job. Of course you have to have the marks to get into post secondary
but its paid for. Studies have shown that people living in a collective society have lower crime rates than those who are living in a

Analysis Of Anthem By Ayn Rand
Imagine a world where everyone is equal; living a life that feels almost programmed. Humans may not realize the impact freedom, technology, and
independence has on our daily lives; however, Anthem by Ayn Rand demonstrates the importance of these rights. The story portrays the life of a young
man, Equality 7–2521, living in a society that is built on severe rules and laws. These laws are designed to eliminate individuality, resulting in an
extremely controlled environment. Due to the laws, Equality 7–2521 rebels against the society. For example, Equality 7–2521 was given the job as a
Street Sweeper but realized life was unchallenging for him, and was punished for going beyond his limitations. Equality 7–2521 understands that
solitude is... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the end of the story, Equality 7–2521 wants to live in a world without the rules and controls the council has set forth. Equality 7–2521 re–invents
electricity, surpassing the best Scholars in his society. As well, Equality 7–2521's brilliance continues, as shown as at the end of the novel, when he's
writing philosophies on the meaning of life. The story proves that even though society is equal, human creativity creates a more diverse way of life.
Equality 7–2521 is unable to express creativity, which minimized the number of freedoms and individuality throughout the society. Rand indicates how
the pronoun affects Equality 7–2521's society. "The word "We" is as lime poured over men, which sets and hardens to stone, and crushes all beneath
it, and that which is white and that which is black are lost equally in the grey of it" (Rand 97). The pronoun "we," deteriorates the society from being
able to be an individual and from basic freedoms. Equality 7–2521 wasn't assigned a name, but assigned a label that society forced to abide with.
Being assigned a name acts as principal as well as "we." In addition, individuals have no identity of their own"...we repeat to ourselves whenever we
are tempted: "we are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, One, indivisible and forever" (Rand 19). Freedoms such as
freedom of speech and the right to equal justice, are nonexistent

Individual Freedom In Ender's Game
In Ender's Game, Colonel Graff shares with Ender his perspective on individual freedom and humanity's demand for survival. He claims that individual
liberty may be sacrificed for the greater good. In context of the book, I agree with Graff's evaluation. Human beings have a responsibility to contribute
to humanity, because the development of society depends on our individual benefactions.
Disregarding the fact that the buggers were innocent, humanity's need for survival easily overrode Ender's personal life. With the entire human species
at risk, individuals should have dismissed their own interests and assisted the community. After all, freedom wouldn't exist if everyone were dead. For
example, during the Roman Republic, Cincinnatus, lived his life contently on a small farm alongside his wife. However, when Rome was under the
threat of an enemy, the citizens urgently searched for a strong leader. They agreed to nominate Cincinnatus as their dictator, for his integrity and
initiative. Although Cincinnatus was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was the most capable human being in determining humanity's fate; therefore, if Ender couldn't defeat the buggers, then no one else could. That is
to say, Ender was remarkably intellectual and gifted. Furthermore, he was able to derive both Peter's ruthlessness and Valentine's compassion. The two
characteristics established a spirit perfect for a military commander. With humans conceiving the bugger threat, it was mandatory for Ender to do his
duty, because not everyone else was as brilliant and ingenious as him. His talents and skills were humanity's only chance for survival. It was rare to
find a common citizen with the aptitude to defeat the buggers, so when there was someone, like Ender, who retained the potential, people relied upon
them to contribute. In today's society, people with the strongest traits and abilities are expected to strengthen and aid the

The Freedom Of Freedom, And Self Actualization As An...
In order to answer the question of what is required for an individual as he exists in society to be free, we must first understand what freedom is. In
synthesizing ideas from the texts studied this semester, thus far, I have arrived at the conclusion that freedom can be described as the ability to pursue
activities that fulfill oneself, and contribute to our own happiness, and self–actualization as an individual. To say that freedom can be "defined" would
imply placing limits on freedom, and would be counterintuitive. Erich Fromm states that "[Freedom's] meaning changes according to the degree of
man's awareness and conception of himself as an independent and separate being (23)." The less a person is bound to obligations albeit moral,
economic, social, or political, and more self–actualized, the more likely he will be to seek happiness through activities that are free from influence of
these aforementioned entities. The notion of freedom that will be discussed in this paper is strongly tied to Freud's suggestion that individuals must
"strive after happiness; [we] want to become happy and remain so (42)." Freud suggests that we accomplish this by channeling our instincts and
regulate them, as to not be a slave to them, or indulging our libido, by accomplishing personal goals, and pursuing creative endeavors which are free
from outside influence. Freud offers other ways to cope with the misery we find from our own decaying selves, the external world, and other people,

Individual Freedom In America
In a discussion a few days ago a gentleman asked me, "what is individual freedom?" It really caused me pause for a moment, for I, like most
Americans, have always taken it for granted. Since being born and raised in America, I have never personally experienced government oppression, as
have so many billions of people all over this world. So I began a search to answer for myself the real meaning of INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, and also
Is America an exceptional country because of it? Barack Obama said publicly he does not believe it is. Hearing a president of the United States make
that statement struck me like a bolt of lightning.
I learned in my search, of all the things America is about, that INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM is our most precious and greatest treasure.... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
I here declare to you, that work will never be finished.
Barack Obama campaigned on "fundamental change in America." Had he given us the details of what he meant by that, I seriously doubt he would
have been elected. Americans were not looking to change INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM for subjugation to an expanding Federal government with more
and more regulation of almost every aspect of our lives. We have become a strong an exceptional nation through the self reliance of INDIVIDUAL
FREEDOM.
Our great nation is a Representative Republic not one of Socialism. Americans every where, we had better get involved and take a stand against
government control of our lives. Now is not the time to be silent as Barrack Obama attempts to dismantle this great country and bring it down to a
lower level of the countries of Europe. Now is the time to devote ourselves and be resolved to defend our INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. He does not
believe we are an exceptional nation. I think you, like I, believe we

An Individual 's Freedom Of Expression
America's forefathers placed great importance on an individual's freedom of expression. The First Amendment of the Constitution specifically
guarantees civil freedoms such as the right of freedom of speech without interference or constraint by government and prohibited Congress from
making a law or in any way prohibiting such rights ("First Amendment"). That has not kept those freedoms from being challenged, however. Many
court cases have been tied into the First Amendment, with a notable one being Citizens United v. FEC. The Supreme Court in 2010 ruled that political
spending is a form of protected speech, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce
individual candidates through advertisements and other marketing tools. (Dunbar) The Supreme Court's willingness to equate money with speech has
been to "effectively gut campaign finance law" in the United States erected to prevent corruption and limit the influence of special interests on
American politics (O'Connor et al. 374). Bernie Sanders, a U.S. Senator from Vermont and an independent presidential candidate vying for the
Democratic Party's nomination, called the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling a "disastrous decision," and wants it overturned.
Interest groups participating in amicus curae briefs (defined as friends of the court) arguing for First Amendment protection in the Citzens United
ruling included groups like the Alliance Defense Fund, American Civil

Essay On Individuality In The Giver
"Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of progress"– John F. Kennedy. Pacific Trails planning committee is debating whether to create a
utopian society based on conformity or individuality and they want to be sure to decide the right choice for an ideal community. Individuality is
the better choice because there's a greater life experience and there are more contributions to society. In a society built on individualism, there is a
more vivid life experience as shown in The Giver by Lois Lowry. "[Jonas] He found he was angry now: irrationally angry at his group mates that
they were satisfied with their lives which had none of the vibrance his own was taking in"(Lowry #99). Jonas, being the new Receiver, has been
given memories of things he has never experienced first hand, such as color and weather, and it made him happy. In any society, the contentedness of
citizen is what at the end of the day keeps it together as seen in Jonas's own community. In the Pacific Trails society, a more evocative life will
ultimately keep the society functioning and prevent citizens from questioning the way the society is run.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"The animals had never seen anything of this kind before( for the farm was an old–fashioned one and had only the most primitive technology) and they
listened in astonishment while Snowball conjured up pictures of fantastic machine which would do the work for them while they grazed at their ease
in the fields..."(Orwell #34). Under their own leadership, the animals were able to create inventions catered to their own needs. Mr. Jones never
listened and didn't care for the animals, therefore, they started the revolution hoping for more food, and longer lives. As for the utopia individual
citizens are given the freedom to address flaws they see in society and improve

The Between Positive And Positive Freedom On The Relations...
Freedom is a difficult doctrine to definite in politics (Berlin, 1969). Philosophy emphasized entirely determined by the public, particularly in sociology
and economics (Swift, 2007). Liberty can clarify the distinction between negative and positive liberty, the following part of this essay covers two
issues (Berlin, 1969). Meanwhile, the second purpose in this essay is to explore the implication of negative and positive freedom on the relationship
between the individual and the states which will utilize different real instance in the world.
Modern liberalism tends to advocate as positive freedom which prefers to sacrifice personal interest toward general will (Berlin, 1969). General will is
meant that the public strives to one purpose ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Something may bring harm impact on political activities, the generation of Hitler 's Germany which takes over in positive freedom as autocracy
(Loflin, 2014). On the hand, majority rule has been decided by minority participation during the democratic process like Hong Kong. In Hong Kong,
the administration which has decided from 1,200 people to represents 7 million citizens (Leg Co, 2014). Some critic claims that the minority may not
in accordance with the real interest of human. Moreover, some people disputed that people may suffer from oppression in the positive liberty. Actually,
if the state would not stand at a boundary of positive freedom obviously that may lose the object toward the common good and make the individual
tends to be a subordinate role , no matter the state would be a dominant on this relationship.
Second, the negative concept of freedom is most commonly assumed in liberal defenses of the constitutional liberties typical of liberal–democratic
societies, for example, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech, and prevention of paternalist or moralist state intervention
(Swift, 2007). The government aims the citizens should achieve self–sufficient and self–realization, also would not rely on the state (Tansey, 1995).
Negative freedom (Formal freedom) can describe two diversities term (Barry, 2000). Firstly, law has been the main restriction of human freedom
(Barry, 2000). Undoubtedly, freedom advocates self–determinate as the

Freedom From An Individual And State Perspective
The concept of freedom has been a point of contention since the inception of political thought. Political theorist and their thought each conceive
freedom differently dependent on their source of thinking. This paper in concerns with analysing the concept of freedom from the political thinkers of
Karl Marx and his communist critique, and Emma Goldman from an Anarchist perspective. The question presented states to compare and contrast how
two of the thinkers conceive of "liberty" or "freedom". In so doing, this paper will break down the investigation into two sections comparing and
contrasting the concept of freedom from an individual and state perspective of Emma Goldman and Karl Marx and a variety of their works.
It is important before breaking down the thinks conceptions of freedom, to examine the basis for which they ground their claims. Both Marx and
Goldman agree that the starting point for a vision of the politics of a society is the state. This remains at the heart of their political theories despite their
conflicting analysis at times. Anarchist freedom can largely be defined through the quote: "the liberation of the human body from the dominion of
property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government" which will be further analysed within the paper. Additionally, as quoted by Marx,
"Beyond begins that development of human energy which is an end in itself, the true realm of freedom, which, however, can blossom forth only with
this realm of necessity

Why Is Individual Freedom Important In The American...
Individual Freedom was important in the American Revolution because it's one of the biggest things that the American people fought for. The people
wanted to become an independent Country out of British rule. "We are a people of cultivators, scattered over an immense territory communicating
with each other by means of good roads and navigable rivers, united by the silken bands of mild government, all respecting the laws, without
dreading their power, because they are equitable. We are all animated with the spirit of an industry which is unfettered and unrestrained, because each
person works for himself." This quote was in Letters from an American Farmer and the first sentence shows how the common people believe that the
people are equal. The second sentence shows individualism by saying each person works for himself. These are what the American people really want
is to be able to do what they want with their lives and not... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that
among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to
abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their safety and happiness." This is the most popular quote in the Declaration of Independence saying the same as the quote from
the first paragraph saying that the people are equal and should be able to do whatever they want to do with their own

Transcendentalism In The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn...
The individual is the center of the universe, everything should be made for the usage of an individual. In Song of Myself, written by Walt Whitman
depicts that an individual felt that they had little power or influence in society. Whitman supports his statements by the usage of the word
transcendentalism, which means that valued nature and individuals belonging in it. Also shown by Mark Twain, satiric novel in 1884, TheAdventures of
Huckleberry Finn, Twain depicts Huck as an illiterate and uneducated 14 year old white boy that can be described as truthful, honest, and transparent.
Twain's purpose is to show white society's standards and the shrewdness to those who defy the social norms of their judgement. Finally, James
McPherson recognizing the notion of independence and individualism by describing the North's desire to live in peace and freedom of slaves.
Mcpherson contemplates about how Confederates fought for independence, for their own property and way of life, for their very survival. Each of the
texts validates that the expression of society to defiance of social norms can lead an individual to seek freedom and leave the imprisonment of society's
judgement, society's judgement is depicted as shrewdness of forcing an individual to be the same as others. Furthermore, as illustrated in The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain reveals Huck's character to be illiterate, and feel isolated as an individual that does not believe the
principles of society; as a result,

Explain How The Constitution Protects Individual Freedoms
The Constitution protects individual freedoms. Its fundamental principles govern the United States of America. The Constitution also places the
government's power in the hands of the citizens. It limits the power of the government and establishes a system of checks and balances. Also the
framework for the freedoms that are granted to each American. It was written during the Philadelphia Convention, it took place from May 25, 1787 to
September 17, 1787. It was signed on September 17, 1787 in the Assembly Room of Pennsylvania State House. It did not go into effect until June 21,
1788 when nine states ratified it. James Madison often was referred to as the Father of the Constitution because many of his philosophies are reflected
in the document.

1984 and Equilibrium
Duhamel 1 Sarah Duhamel Mrs. K. Venturini ENG4U Friday, June 7th, 2013 Battles for Individual Freedom Dystopia is an imagined place or state
in which everything is unpleasant or bad, typically a totalitarian or environmentally degraded one (The Free Dictionary). Characteristics of a dystopian
society are shown throughout George Orwell's novel 1984, and in the 2002 film Equilibrium directed by Kirk Wimmer. Winston Smith, in 1984, is a
lower ranked member of society, with an outer party member job. He is watched twenty–four hours a day, seven days a week through telescreens set up
throughout Oceania. He always finds the Party's omniscient leader staring back; also known as Big Brother. Winston becomes over–whelmed with all
of the strict... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Goldstein is the "enemy of people". This is called the "two minutes of hate". Winston secretly rebels against the Party by having a diary and by having
secret meeting with Julia, a young lady who also works in the Ministry of Truth building for the Junior Anti–Sex League. During one of Winston and
Julia's meetings in the Golden Country, Winston says, "I have purity. I hate goodness. I don't want virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone to be
corrupt to the bones"(Orwell 127). One might argue that the rules of sexual relations and marriage the Party holds its members related to purity, virtue
and goodness, but this relation is in the actions only, not on the emotion behind them. "Have you done this before? Of course. Hundreds of times–well,
scores of times, anyway." (Orwell 131). To achieve this goal of eventually defeating the Party, both Winston and Julia agree that they are willing "to lie,
to steal, to forge, to murder, to encourage drug–taking and prostitution, to disseminate Duhamel 4 venereal diseases, to throw vitriol in a child's face"
(Orwell 273). These are all characteristics of dehumanization Winston has to face. Similarly in the 2002 film Equilibrium directed by Kirk Wimmer the
main character John Preston portrayed by Christian Bale faces dehumanization just like Winston. Preston is head of

An Air Of Controversy Regarding Laws Promoting Personal...
There is an air of controversy concerning laws promoting personal and social responsibility and individual freedom. After all, there is a dire need for
social change in a society that is becoming ever more self–centered and materialistic. This social change might come from laws that encourage some
sort of responsibility. For example, in Texas, a future policy forsocial responsibility could be a ban on texting and driving. Personal responsibility
policies could be limits on welfare benefits and childhood immunization requirements. While a welfare reform would ease the burden of taxpayers and
bans on texting and driving and requirements of immunization would protect society from harm, these policies encourage quite a bit of debate.
Basically, it is difficult to enact laws that are for the benefit of society as a whole without interfering or restrictingindividual freedoms, and vice versa.
In the modern day and age, there are many groups who either demand to keep their rights protected, like minority groups, or emerging groups that want
legislation passed to protect their rights, like the homosexual community. Of course, there is nothing wrong with these rights, after all, the basic
foundation of democracy guarantees equality. However, the problem arises, as Lloyd put it, when society becomes "selfish" and "materialistic"–
focusing only on "lack of rights" and creating a moral dilemma that is slowly ruining society. Haskins broadens this by defining personal responsibility
as

society can be seen as a malevolent force, bringing about...
'Society can be seen as a malevolent force, bringing about the dehumanisation of the individual'
To what extent is this idea shown in 'The Handmaid's Tale' and 'We' by comparing the writers presentation of the pressures society brings to bear on
the individual. "A rat in a maze is free to go anywhere, as long as it stays inside the maze." Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale
To understand what is meant by the term 'dehumanisation' one must first ascertain what it is that makes us human. The Oxford English Dictionary
defines 'dehumanisation' as 'the deprivation of positive human qualities'. This would imply that it is qualities ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Though Offred's mind has been affected by the indoctrination, she still expresses her individualism throughout the novel. This is seen through small
acts of rebellion like when she takes the butter to use as moisturizer and by manipulating language to retain what is left of her sense of humour. It 's an
event, a small defiance of rule, so small as to be undetectable, but such moments are the rewards [she] hold[s] out for [her]self, like the candy [she]
hoarded, as a child, at the back of a drawer. Offred relies on these 'rewards' because they symbolize an opportunity for individuality, whether it is
sneaking a look at one of the guardians or touching herself during the night, she attempts to clutch at what arguably makes her human. Contrastingly,
when given a substantial choice by the doctor, she remains indecisive and almost apathetic which leads to the diminishment of the readers sympathy.
This would suggest that it isn't the society that is responsible for the dehumanisation of the individual, it is the individual themselves.
The most substantial difference, however is the way in which both writers convey the importance of retaining individualism in society. Zamyatin uses
the characters D–503 and I–330 in contrast to each other to display different schools of thought in the situation – surrendering ones individualism for a
collective dream and rebelling because (as

What Is True Individual Freedom In The Story Of An Hour
"True individual freedom cannot exist without independence," was a quote Franklin D. Roosevelt once said. What is meant by this statement is you
cannot have freedom without independence and vice versa. It's like the peanut butter needed in a jelly sandwich. Mrs Mallard represents this quote
in the short story The Story of An Hour by Kate Chopin. One day, Mrs. Mallard, the protagonist received the news that her husband had died in a
railroad accident. Once she had heard this, she went to her room and started to sob. She was sad that her husband died, yet she often had not loved
him. But then, she realized that she can be free and independent since her husband is dead. Mrs. Mallard, also known as Louise, starts to pray that her
life... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mallard starts to feel free and independent since her husband isn't around the house anymore. She came to her consensus that there are positive
things that are coming from this. In the story, Mrs. Mallard says "'Free Body and soul free!' she kept whispering" (15). The reader learns that Mrs.
Mallard is now feeling like waves of freedom have washed over her, instead of gloomy ones. She realized that she is now not held back by anyone,
as she was seemingly restricted by her husband to do things she had always dreamed of doing, by herself. Her body and soul are free, looking
forward to fun days later on in her life. She could finally have the freedom and independence she had always wanted. A little further into the story,
Mrs. Mallard's thoughts are "Spring and summer days, and all sorts of days that would be her own. She breathed a quick prayer that life might be
long" (18). This is another example of the author showing Mrs. Mallard's independence and freedom. She is looking forward to free and independent
spring and summer days in the future. She also makes a quick prayer that life might be long because she now wants to experience fun days with her
two new traits. Mrs. Mallard wants her freedom and independence to be the longest it possibly can, up until she dies. Mrs. Mallard wants to experience
her freedom and independence now since her husband has

Most Powerful Influence
Individuality, The Most Powerful Influence Being an individual is something that many people wish or want to be; however, standing out means
standing alone, which presents a challenge that not many people are willing to accept. I myself have experienced it, such as while other teenagers
prefer black in everything and you entering in school wearing a bright purple jacket which you find personable but others, however, find it weird.
Thus, most people in today's society try to step out of the world of conformity, but eventually, they step back in due to their fear of not being liked.
Most of all, the significance is worthwhile, as soon as you forget about other people in the world, individuality is one of the best feelings

Essay about Individual Freedom in Melville's Bartleby,...
Individual Freedom in Melville's Bartleby, the Scrivener
What motivates you to go to work everyday? What motivates you to dress the way you do? What motivates you to be reasonable when it comes to
normal requests? Ah, the ultimate question in need of an answer: Who determines what is reasonable and normal, and should we not determine these
matters for ourselves? Chaos would result, you say, if every individual were granted that freedom. Yet, we all do have that freedom, and Herman
Melville (1819–1891) through the interpretation of a man who prefers to follow his own path in "Bartleby, the Scrivener", subjectively conveys the
mental anguish he experienced as a writer and man when the literary world attempted to steal that freedom. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To force himself to live by the standards of normalcy set forth by society would be to kill the man who lived within. Bartleby did choose physical
death over conformity at the end of the story. Melville chose a different path than Bartleby, not a physical death, but a death all the same.
Through Bartleby, Melville describes the deadness he feels within when having to conform his writings to the reasonable standards and common
usage of literature. For Melville, the doorway that would lead to acceptance in the literary world was barred shut to his entry, the hinge held firmly
in place by his own creativity, sparred by his own internal sense of reason. To walk across the threshold would require the loosening of the hinge.
With the axis of his soul sliding downward, Melville stepped through the doorway. Melville quickly realized it was the doorway to hell. He had stepped
into a world of mental torment; mental torment that even the good Reverend Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) whose sermons of fiery damnation could
not measure up to (503). He had sold into slavery his mind and soul to the bidders of the celebrated literary world. Melville's gains were minimal when
weighed against his losses. He shared with Nathaniel Hawthorne his inner turmoil, "What I feel most moved to write, that is banned, – it will not pay.
Yet, altogether, write the other way I cannot.

Happiness And Happiness : The State Of Happiness
Happiness. The only known definition to branch off of this word is, "the state of being happy". Happiness. Is there only one definition of what
happiness truly is? As we indulge in the world of We, we are often confronted with this theme and must decipher the meaning ourselves. Constructed
and constricted happiness follows this dystopian society as the protagonist records his daily occurrences in each chapter. Stripped of individuality,
these people live in homes made of glass so they can be monitored with ease by the authority inside the walls. Notably, identical blue uniforms drape
themselves over the bodies of each and every person, who is commonly known as a number. Scheduling their days by following an hourly advent
procedure, these numbers only have two hours in a day of recreational activity. As assumed, this recreational time is structured in a way where
numbers march along in groups of four with the anthem of the Single State plays triumphantly throughout the streets. During the weeks, a number is
often given one hour every few days to engage in sexual activities with another number who owns a pink slip. In like manner, love and marriage do
not exist in this society so quantities of pink slips are given out based on a number's need for sexual interaction. These pink slips are used entirely for
recreation and not procreation. According to the One State, happiness and freedom are incompatible within a society. Because of this, the State has
removed freedom from these

Individual Freedom In The Novel 1984 By George Orwell
Throughout the 1940's, the society in America was full of change because of World War II. After the war the Totalitarian government roles arise as an
absolute government that permits no individual freedom. In this time of period it had an enormous impact in many of the successful works that were
inspired by this time of era. The novel 1984 by George Orwell is considered one of the most influential novels that greatly impacted readers all
around the world . Orwell's objective was to give the people an insight of what it would be like to have a society like Oceania and what
possibilities would arise if it were to become reality. Orwell promotes individual freedom and represents the readers with a dreadful view of a
controlled life. The greatest impact Orwell made is that the people became afraid and gave the sense of believe to rebel against the Totalitarian state.
He lived during the biggest destructive events like the rise of Nazi in Germany, WWI, the Great Depression, and the Communist China. The novel
draws an argument parallels to the imagery of the real–world government to persuade the audience in the novel 1984. The theme is ignorance
compared to strength The novel takes place in the capital of Oceanian making it Dystopian. Orwell organizes it with real–world situations that occurred
in the 40's and to the day the novel was realized. Orwell manages to put vivid characters that add a significance to his book about modern society and
manipulative propaganda. For

Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties Essay
Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties
The purpose which Rousseau ostensibly gives his social contract is to free man from the illegitimate chains to which existing governments have
shackled him. If this is his aim, then it follows that he should be most concerned with the preservation of freedom in political society, initially so that
savage man might be lured out of nature and into society in the first place, and afterwards so that Rousseau's framework for this society will prevent the
present tyranny from reasserting itself. Indeed, in his definition of purpose for man's initial union into society, he claims that, despite his membership in
an association to which he must necessarily have some sort of obligation if the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because man himself has been changed in this transition, the loss of his natural freedom is not a loss at all because he can no longer make any use of
a freedom that requires only self–interest to exercise, whereas the freedom gained–the civil freedom that gives him a part in all the society's
undertakings–is suited perfectly to his new, moral nature.
In light of this change in man's nature, several of Rousseau's more shocking claims can be reconciled. The most striking–that man must be "forced to be
free" by compelling him to obey if he does not wish to abide by the decision of the general will voluntarily–appears much less paradoxical when viewed
in the context of society's shaping effect on the individual. Rousseau sees human nature as a constantly changing set of predispositions, and law is one
of the forces shaping these dispositions. This is most clearly seen in his justification of censorship, in which he contends that "not nature but opinion
determines the choice of [people's] pleasures" and that "when legislation weakens, morals degenerate," establishing a causative relationship between
good laws and good natures (IV.vii.3–4). Thus, for a man to be forced to be free is merely for his nature to be fully

Rousseau 's Views On Freedom Of The Individual
Over the course of history this idea of freedom has been developed and defined by many famous political and philosophical thinkers. Many of
Jean–Jacques Rousseau's ideas are acknowledged in the "Discourse on the Origin of Inequality" and more notably the "The Social Contract". John
Stuart Mill's major points originate from a book called "On Liberty". All of these works are still read today and taught in schools around the world.
In particular, their ideas on freedom and liberty have drawn a considerable amount of attention. For instance, Rousseau is well known for his idea
of "forcing citizens to be free", while Mill claims that freedom can be found in "pursing our own good in our own way". Therefore, it is evident
that fundamental differences occur between Rousseau's and Mill's ideas on liberty and freedom. Rousseau's rejects this classical liberal idea of
freedom of the individual, and instead argues that the highest quality of freedom is achieved through a social contract where collective decisions
represent the law and people have a duty to the state, while Mill sees freedom as not being constrained by the government (freedom from laws) and
pursuing one's own good as long as it does no harm to others. According to Rousseau man was born "naturally good". However, when man began to
acquire private property it created a society where the naturally good of individuals became corrupted. Modern institutions like private property are the
driving force behind an immoral

Balancing Individual Privacy with Press Freedom
Balancing Individual Privacy with Press Freedom
Alan F. Westin, a privacy expert at Columbia University, once wrote: Privacy is the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for
themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others (self information control right). In this age of mass media,
individual privacy has become a casualty of journalists' feeding frenzy and it has become really hard for societies to determine the nature and process
of information in the public domain. In this article I reflect on the problem in Nepal's context.
Despite being a social animal, every human being seeks seclusion and solitude within the open mirror of society. Privacy is inherent in the behavior ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The current interim constitution (article 28) stipulates that except on the circumstance as provided by the law, the privacy of the person, his or her
residence, property, document, statistics, correspondence and character is inviolable
Similarly, the constitution of the country also guarantees freedom of the press (article 15 interim constitution, 2063). It ensures the right to freedom of
press and publication. This right was included as a specific fundamental right in previous Constitution of Nepal 2047.
Freedom of the press means the right to print and publish without any interference from the state or any public authority. The liberty of the press
consists freedom from prior restraints upon publication of content. Freedom of the press also means freedom of dissemination, news and views from
diverse and antagonistic sources for the knowledge and welfare of the people.
The Press and Publication Act (2048), a new version of the earlier Press and Publication Act (2039), also guaranteed the constitutional freedom of the
press. The Gali Beizzati Ain 2016 (such as in article 3 and 8) recognizes freedom of the press. It says that every human being shall enjoy free press,
without any discrimination on the ground of race, color, sex etc.
There are, however, very few International Conventions which guarantee right to privacy, but there are several conventions regarding press freedom.
For example, the right to privacy is enumerated in article 12 of the Universal

Individual Freedoms Limited by Ethnicity and Religion

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Brown

More from Jennifer Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Individual Freedoms Limited by Ethnicity and Religion