The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy, which is a framework for categorizing educational learning objectives into levels of complexity and specificity. It was created in the 1950s by Benjamin Bloom and categorizes learning into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The cognitive domain deals with mental skills and knowledge and includes categories like remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The document provides detailed explanations and examples of each category in Bloom's Taxonomy. It also discusses revisions made to Bloom's Taxonomy in the 1990s.
This document discusses learning outcomes and their key features. Learning outcomes describe what a learner should know, understand, and be able to do as a result of learning. They are specific statements about the skills and knowledge students will demonstrate at the end of a course. Learning outcomes are assessable, not just goals, and are simply and clearly described with an emphasis on the learner and their abilities. The document also contrasts learning outcomes with learning objectives, which describe what content a teacher intends to cover rather than what students will achieve. It provides examples of learning objectives and outcomes and discusses different types of outcomes like conceptual, process, and skill outcomes.
This document discusses the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and improving student thinking. It provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, noting that the revised version changes the terminology, structure, and emphasis. The goal is to help teachers develop lessons and assessments that engage students in higher-order thinking skills like analysis, evaluation, and creation.
This document describes Bloom's Taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into six levels: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. It provides examples of the cognitive processes and thinking skills demonstrated at each level, from the basic recall and understanding at the lower levels, to the more complex abilities to evaluate, create new ideas, and make judgments at the higher levels. Question cues are also given to help assess the level of learning being tested.
Here are my slides for my report for my Advanced Measurements and Evaluation subject on Educational Measurement and Evaluation. #Polytechnic University of the Philippines. #GraduateSchool
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies learning objectives into six levels: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Each level is defined and examples of learning objectives for that level are given. The document also discusses using Bloom's Taxonomy to design classroom lectures and assessments that target different cognitive abilities.
The document discusses learning outcomes, which are formal statements that articulate what students are able to do after instruction and why. Assessing learning outcomes allows teachers to show evidence of student learning and use that evidence for accountability, accreditation, and continuous program improvement. Effective learning outcomes should be measurable, clear, integrated, use appropriate Bloom's Taxonomy levels, and articulate what students need to know and be able to do and why.
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 to promote higher forms of thinking in education beyond memorization and rote learning. It categorizes levels of thinking skills moving from basic recall to more complex and abstract levels of critical thinking. The cognitive domain includes six levels - knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, evaluation, and creation - moving from remembering to generating new ideas. The taxonomy provides a framework to organize learning objectives to help teachers plan instruction and assessment aligned to the objectives.
This document discusses learning outcomes and their key features. Learning outcomes describe what a learner should know, understand, and be able to do as a result of learning. They are specific statements about the skills and knowledge students will demonstrate at the end of a course. Learning outcomes are assessable, not just goals, and are simply and clearly described with an emphasis on the learner and their abilities. The document also contrasts learning outcomes with learning objectives, which describe what content a teacher intends to cover rather than what students will achieve. It provides examples of learning objectives and outcomes and discusses different types of outcomes like conceptual, process, and skill outcomes.
This document discusses the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and improving student thinking. It provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, noting that the revised version changes the terminology, structure, and emphasis. The goal is to help teachers develop lessons and assessments that engage students in higher-order thinking skills like analysis, evaluation, and creation.
This document describes Bloom's Taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into six levels: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. It provides examples of the cognitive processes and thinking skills demonstrated at each level, from the basic recall and understanding at the lower levels, to the more complex abilities to evaluate, create new ideas, and make judgments at the higher levels. Question cues are also given to help assess the level of learning being tested.
Here are my slides for my report for my Advanced Measurements and Evaluation subject on Educational Measurement and Evaluation. #Polytechnic University of the Philippines. #GraduateSchool
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies learning objectives into six levels: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Each level is defined and examples of learning objectives for that level are given. The document also discusses using Bloom's Taxonomy to design classroom lectures and assessments that target different cognitive abilities.
The document discusses learning outcomes, which are formal statements that articulate what students are able to do after instruction and why. Assessing learning outcomes allows teachers to show evidence of student learning and use that evidence for accountability, accreditation, and continuous program improvement. Effective learning outcomes should be measurable, clear, integrated, use appropriate Bloom's Taxonomy levels, and articulate what students need to know and be able to do and why.
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 to promote higher forms of thinking in education beyond memorization and rote learning. It categorizes levels of thinking skills moving from basic recall to more complex and abstract levels of critical thinking. The cognitive domain includes six levels - knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, evaluation, and creation - moving from remembering to generating new ideas. The taxonomy provides a framework to organize learning objectives to help teachers plan instruction and assessment aligned to the objectives.
Reflective teaching involves critical reflection on one's own teaching practices and styles. It has three levels: reflection-in-action during teaching, reflection-on-action after teaching through analysis of lessons, and reflection-for-action to decide on future actions. Effective reflection requires self-reflection through tools like teaching portfolios and journals. Teachers can also reflect through peer observation, action research, and developing critical friendships with colleagues to discuss practices and seek advice. The goal of reflection is to improve teaching and student outcomes by distinguishing effective methods from less successful ones.
Cognitive Domain(Bloom Taxonomy) In Curriculum DevelopmentTasneem Ahmad
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, which is a classification system used to define educational goals and objectives. It identifies three domains of learning - cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The cognitive domain involves thinking and knowledge-based skills, and contains six levels: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The levels progress from basic recall to more complex thinking skills. The document provides definitions and examples of educational objectives for each of the six levels in the cognitive domain.
An instructional objective describes what a learner will be able to do after instruction. Objectives should be SMART: specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound. There are four components of an objective: the action verb, conditions, standard, and intended audience. Bloom's Taxonomy classifies educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Within the cognitive domain are six categories of increasing complexity: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
This document discusses the qualities of effective teachers. It identifies three broad categories of qualities: motivating personality, orientation toward success, and professional demeanor. Some key traits of motivating personality include enthusiasm, variety, warmth and humor. Orientation toward success refers to teachers believing in their own and students' ability to succeed. Professional demeanor means focusing on helping students learn and being professionally knowledgeable and credible. The document also lists exclusive qualities needed for an Islamic studies teacher, such as having an attractive personality like the Prophet Muhammad, knowledge of both education and Islamic principles, and forgiveness.
The conceptual approach is choosing and defining content to be taught through big ideas that lead students to discover laws and principles of a subject. It uses a conceptual scheme including terms, concepts, generalizations, and principles to synthesize facts into a simple statement of truth. The conceptual attainment process defines concepts by comparing examples and non-examples until a definition is derived through inductive learning. Conceptual formation helps students think effectively by refining their understanding when approaching new information.
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/ja.maica.393
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
Definition of Taxonomy
Benjamin Samuel Bloom
History of Bloom's Taxonomy
Three Domains
Six Levels of Cognitive Domain
Appropriate Verbs
Products and Model Questions
The document discusses best practices for writing learning objectives that are aligned with instruction and assessment. It emphasizes that objectives should have three parts: a measurable action verb, the condition or context of the performance, and the criteria or standard for acceptable performance. Learning objectives should be specific, measurable, and focus on what students will be able to do rather than just know. They provide the targets and expectations for what students will learn. Objectives should incorporate a range of cognitive levels and be assessable.
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives which organizes learning objectives into three domains: 1) Cognitive objectives involve knowledge and mental skills, ranging from basic recall to evaluation; 2) Affective objectives concern attitudes, interests and values; 3) Psychomotor objectives involve physical skills and movements. Within each domain are levels of complexity, and examples are given of verbs that can be used to formulate objectives at each level.
Bloom Taxonomy of Instructional ObjectivesAMME SANDHU
This document presents information on Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. It discusses the three domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor objectives. The cognitive domain involves knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The affective domain involves receiving, responding, valuing, organization, and characterization. The psychomotor domain involves perception, set, guided response, mechanism, and complex overt response. Bloom's Taxonomy provides a framework to classify educational goals and objectives to promote higher-order thinking and allow selection of appropriate assessment techniques.
The document summarizes revisions made to Bloom's Taxonomy of learning domains. The original taxonomy developed in 1956 categorized learning objectives using nouns. It was revised in 2001 to use active verbs and be more relevant for teachers. The categories were renamed and the hierarchy was adjusted with Synthesis and Evaluation changing places. The revised taxonomy is also two-dimensional, with knowledge and cognitive process dimensions instead of being one-dimensional. It provides examples of applying the taxonomy to the story of Goldilocks.
The document summarizes Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains, which identifies three main domains of educational activities: Cognitive (mental skills/knowledge), Affective (growth in feelings/attitudes), and Psychomotor (manual/physical skills). It provides details on the hierarchical subdivisions within each domain, ranging from basic/simple behaviors and skills to more complex ones. The cognitive domain includes categories like knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The affective domain includes receiving phenomena, responding, valuing, organization, and internalizing values. The psychomotor domain includes categories like perception, set, guided response, mechanism, complex overt response, adaptation, and origination.
Set induction refers to the steps a teacher takes at the beginning of a lesson to introduce the topic and engage students. It is important for gaining students' attention, motivating them, and getting them focused on the lesson. There are several ways to conduct an effective set induction, including using attention-grabbing methods like starting a lesson in a low tone of voice, employing interest methods like showing real-world examples, putting the lesson in context by assessing prior knowledge and linking it to new content, and utilizing advance organizers like a simple statement or mind map to establish a framework.
This document provides an introduction to educational research. It defines educational research as a formal, systematic process to solve problems related to education through careful investigation. The characteristics of educational research include investigating both the science and art of education through testing hypotheses, correcting errors, and suggesting improvements. Educational research has historically developed in four phases from before 1900 to the present day. The document outlines different types of research such as basic research, applied research, and action research. It also discusses the need for educational research and some limitations to educational research, such as the complexity of studying human behavior and difficulties in observation, replication, and measurement.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, which is a classification of learning objectives into different levels of complexity and specificity. It describes the three domains of the taxonomy - cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The cognitive domain involves knowledge and intellectual skills, ranging from basic recall or recognition to more complex processes like analysis, synthesis and evaluation. The affective domain describes the way attitudes, values and appreciation develop, from basic awareness to internalizing values. The psychomotor domain involves physical skills and ranges from basic perception to highly complex skills that are adapted to new situations.
Bloom's Taxonomy provides a framework to promote higher-order thinking skills. It organizes six levels of cognitive complexity: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Questions and assessments for each level progress from basic recall to more complex thinking, such as analyzing information and creating new ideas. The taxonomy can help teachers design lessons that develop critical thinking at all cognitive levels.
A great deal of your time university will be spent thinking; thinking about what people have said,
what you have read, what you yourself are thinking and how your thinking has changed. It is
generally believed that the thinking process involves two aspects: reflective thinking and critical
thinking. They are not separate processes; rather, they are closely connected (Brookfield 1987).
Bloom's Taxonomy outlines six levels of cognitive skills moving from lower to higher order thinking skills: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom and his team created this taxonomy to categorize educational goals and intellectual abilities. The taxonomy provides a framework to ensure educational objectives incorporate higher level tasks that develop critical thinking skills necessary for success in formal assessments.
This document defines models of teaching as instructional designs that specify environmental situations to cause student interaction and behavioral change. A model of teaching consists of guidelines for designing educational activities and environments to achieve instructional goals. The document discusses the assumptions, functions, elements, features, and families of models of teaching, noting they help teachers plan activities and curriculum according to learning outcomes, environment, and performance criteria. Models are classified into information processing, social, personal, and behavioral systems families based on psychological learning theories and instructional goals.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education. It was created in 1956 and identifies six levels of cognitive complexity: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. These levels help ensure instruction develops students' higher-order thinking skills. The taxonomy is a multi-tiered model used to classify objectives according to complexity of thinking. It encourages students to advance to higher levels of thought. The document also discusses the affective domain of learning involving attitudes, values, and emotions, and the psychomotor domain involving physical skills and movements.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills that was created by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom in 1956. It divides thinking skills into six categories moving from basic recall or recognition of facts through increasingly more complex and abstract mental levels of comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The document provides details on the origins and development of Bloom's Taxonomy, including its domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. It also explains the categories within each domain and provides classroom examples of activities and assessments for each thinking skill level.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy and higher-order thinking skills. It discusses the original taxonomy developed by Benjamin Bloom in the 1950s and the revised version created by Lorin Anderson in the 1990s. The taxonomy organizes six levels of thinking from basic recall to more complex levels of analysis, evaluation and creation. It also discusses the importance of questioning and applying the taxonomy to lesson planning.
Reflective teaching involves critical reflection on one's own teaching practices and styles. It has three levels: reflection-in-action during teaching, reflection-on-action after teaching through analysis of lessons, and reflection-for-action to decide on future actions. Effective reflection requires self-reflection through tools like teaching portfolios and journals. Teachers can also reflect through peer observation, action research, and developing critical friendships with colleagues to discuss practices and seek advice. The goal of reflection is to improve teaching and student outcomes by distinguishing effective methods from less successful ones.
Cognitive Domain(Bloom Taxonomy) In Curriculum DevelopmentTasneem Ahmad
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, which is a classification system used to define educational goals and objectives. It identifies three domains of learning - cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The cognitive domain involves thinking and knowledge-based skills, and contains six levels: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The levels progress from basic recall to more complex thinking skills. The document provides definitions and examples of educational objectives for each of the six levels in the cognitive domain.
An instructional objective describes what a learner will be able to do after instruction. Objectives should be SMART: specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound. There are four components of an objective: the action verb, conditions, standard, and intended audience. Bloom's Taxonomy classifies educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Within the cognitive domain are six categories of increasing complexity: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
This document discusses the qualities of effective teachers. It identifies three broad categories of qualities: motivating personality, orientation toward success, and professional demeanor. Some key traits of motivating personality include enthusiasm, variety, warmth and humor. Orientation toward success refers to teachers believing in their own and students' ability to succeed. Professional demeanor means focusing on helping students learn and being professionally knowledgeable and credible. The document also lists exclusive qualities needed for an Islamic studies teacher, such as having an attractive personality like the Prophet Muhammad, knowledge of both education and Islamic principles, and forgiveness.
The conceptual approach is choosing and defining content to be taught through big ideas that lead students to discover laws and principles of a subject. It uses a conceptual scheme including terms, concepts, generalizations, and principles to synthesize facts into a simple statement of truth. The conceptual attainment process defines concepts by comparing examples and non-examples until a definition is derived through inductive learning. Conceptual formation helps students think effectively by refining their understanding when approaching new information.
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/ja.maica.393
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
Definition of Taxonomy
Benjamin Samuel Bloom
History of Bloom's Taxonomy
Three Domains
Six Levels of Cognitive Domain
Appropriate Verbs
Products and Model Questions
The document discusses best practices for writing learning objectives that are aligned with instruction and assessment. It emphasizes that objectives should have three parts: a measurable action verb, the condition or context of the performance, and the criteria or standard for acceptable performance. Learning objectives should be specific, measurable, and focus on what students will be able to do rather than just know. They provide the targets and expectations for what students will learn. Objectives should incorporate a range of cognitive levels and be assessable.
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives which organizes learning objectives into three domains: 1) Cognitive objectives involve knowledge and mental skills, ranging from basic recall to evaluation; 2) Affective objectives concern attitudes, interests and values; 3) Psychomotor objectives involve physical skills and movements. Within each domain are levels of complexity, and examples are given of verbs that can be used to formulate objectives at each level.
Bloom Taxonomy of Instructional ObjectivesAMME SANDHU
This document presents information on Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. It discusses the three domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor objectives. The cognitive domain involves knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The affective domain involves receiving, responding, valuing, organization, and characterization. The psychomotor domain involves perception, set, guided response, mechanism, and complex overt response. Bloom's Taxonomy provides a framework to classify educational goals and objectives to promote higher-order thinking and allow selection of appropriate assessment techniques.
The document summarizes revisions made to Bloom's Taxonomy of learning domains. The original taxonomy developed in 1956 categorized learning objectives using nouns. It was revised in 2001 to use active verbs and be more relevant for teachers. The categories were renamed and the hierarchy was adjusted with Synthesis and Evaluation changing places. The revised taxonomy is also two-dimensional, with knowledge and cognitive process dimensions instead of being one-dimensional. It provides examples of applying the taxonomy to the story of Goldilocks.
The document summarizes Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains, which identifies three main domains of educational activities: Cognitive (mental skills/knowledge), Affective (growth in feelings/attitudes), and Psychomotor (manual/physical skills). It provides details on the hierarchical subdivisions within each domain, ranging from basic/simple behaviors and skills to more complex ones. The cognitive domain includes categories like knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The affective domain includes receiving phenomena, responding, valuing, organization, and internalizing values. The psychomotor domain includes categories like perception, set, guided response, mechanism, complex overt response, adaptation, and origination.
Set induction refers to the steps a teacher takes at the beginning of a lesson to introduce the topic and engage students. It is important for gaining students' attention, motivating them, and getting them focused on the lesson. There are several ways to conduct an effective set induction, including using attention-grabbing methods like starting a lesson in a low tone of voice, employing interest methods like showing real-world examples, putting the lesson in context by assessing prior knowledge and linking it to new content, and utilizing advance organizers like a simple statement or mind map to establish a framework.
This document provides an introduction to educational research. It defines educational research as a formal, systematic process to solve problems related to education through careful investigation. The characteristics of educational research include investigating both the science and art of education through testing hypotheses, correcting errors, and suggesting improvements. Educational research has historically developed in four phases from before 1900 to the present day. The document outlines different types of research such as basic research, applied research, and action research. It also discusses the need for educational research and some limitations to educational research, such as the complexity of studying human behavior and difficulties in observation, replication, and measurement.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, which is a classification of learning objectives into different levels of complexity and specificity. It describes the three domains of the taxonomy - cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The cognitive domain involves knowledge and intellectual skills, ranging from basic recall or recognition to more complex processes like analysis, synthesis and evaluation. The affective domain describes the way attitudes, values and appreciation develop, from basic awareness to internalizing values. The psychomotor domain involves physical skills and ranges from basic perception to highly complex skills that are adapted to new situations.
Bloom's Taxonomy provides a framework to promote higher-order thinking skills. It organizes six levels of cognitive complexity: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Questions and assessments for each level progress from basic recall to more complex thinking, such as analyzing information and creating new ideas. The taxonomy can help teachers design lessons that develop critical thinking at all cognitive levels.
A great deal of your time university will be spent thinking; thinking about what people have said,
what you have read, what you yourself are thinking and how your thinking has changed. It is
generally believed that the thinking process involves two aspects: reflective thinking and critical
thinking. They are not separate processes; rather, they are closely connected (Brookfield 1987).
Bloom's Taxonomy outlines six levels of cognitive skills moving from lower to higher order thinking skills: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom and his team created this taxonomy to categorize educational goals and intellectual abilities. The taxonomy provides a framework to ensure educational objectives incorporate higher level tasks that develop critical thinking skills necessary for success in formal assessments.
This document defines models of teaching as instructional designs that specify environmental situations to cause student interaction and behavioral change. A model of teaching consists of guidelines for designing educational activities and environments to achieve instructional goals. The document discusses the assumptions, functions, elements, features, and families of models of teaching, noting they help teachers plan activities and curriculum according to learning outcomes, environment, and performance criteria. Models are classified into information processing, social, personal, and behavioral systems families based on psychological learning theories and instructional goals.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education. It was created in 1956 and identifies six levels of cognitive complexity: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. These levels help ensure instruction develops students' higher-order thinking skills. The taxonomy is a multi-tiered model used to classify objectives according to complexity of thinking. It encourages students to advance to higher levels of thought. The document also discusses the affective domain of learning involving attitudes, values, and emotions, and the psychomotor domain involving physical skills and movements.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills that was created by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom in 1956. It divides thinking skills into six categories moving from basic recall or recognition of facts through increasingly more complex and abstract mental levels of comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The document provides details on the origins and development of Bloom's Taxonomy, including its domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. It also explains the categories within each domain and provides classroom examples of activities and assessments for each thinking skill level.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy and higher-order thinking skills. It discusses the original taxonomy developed by Benjamin Bloom in the 1950s and the revised version created by Lorin Anderson in the 1990s. The taxonomy organizes six levels of thinking from basic recall to more complex levels of analysis, evaluation and creation. It also discusses the importance of questioning and applying the taxonomy to lesson planning.
Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives
Developed in 1950’s
Means of expressing qualitatively different kinds of thinking
• Been adapted for classroom use as a planning tool
• Continues to be one of the most universally applied models
• Provides a way to organize thinking skills into six levels, from the most basic to the more complex levels of thinking
These gentlemen are the primary authors of the revisions to what had become known as Bloom’s Taxonomy — an ordering of cognitive skills.
Both of these primary authors were in a perfect position to orchestrate looking at the classic taxonomy critically.
They called together a group of educational psychologists and educators to help them with the revisions.
Lorin Anderson was once a student of the famed Benjamin Bloom, and
David Krathwohl was one of Bloom’s partners as he devised his classic cognitive taxonomy.
Their combined efforts led to Bloom’s Taxonomy revised.
• The names of six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms.
• As the taxonomy reflects different forms of thinking and thinking is an active process verbs were used rather than nouns.
• The subcategories of the six major categories were also replaced by verbs and some subcategories were reorganized.
• The knowledge category was renamed. Knowledge is an outcome or product of thinking not a form of thinking per se. Consequently, the word knowledge was inappropriate to describe a category of thinking and was replaced with the word remembering instead.
• Comprehension and synthesis were retitled to understanding and creating respectively, in order to better reflect the nature of the thinking defined in each category.
• The revision's primary focus was on the taxonomy in use. Essentially, this means that the revised taxonomy is a more authentic tool for curriculum planning, instructional delivery and assessment.
• The revision is aimed at a broader audience. Bloom’s Taxonomy was traditionally viewed as a tool best applied in the earlier years of schooling (i.e. primary and junior primary years). The revised taxonomy is more universal and easily applicable at elementary, secondary and even tertiary levels.
• The revision emphasizes explanation and description of subcategories.
l
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills. It provides an overview of the original taxonomy developed in the 1950s and revisions made in the 1990s. The revisions include changing the categories from nouns to verbs and emphasizing explanation over memorization. The taxonomy helps teachers design lessons and assessments that engage students at different levels of thinking from remembering to creating.
St. Cecilia Teaching Strategies that Work.pptxMilanWanderland
This document discusses various teaching strategies and perspectives on effective teaching. It begins by outlining the key components of teaching, including content knowledge, teaching skills, the ability to articulate ideas, enthusiasm, understanding students, adaptability, and openness. It then presents different teaching styles like formal lectures versus more discussion-based approaches. Overall, it advocates for student-centered, active learning strategies like discussions and discovery learning rather than purely teacher-centered lecture methods, noting that these types of involvement and participation can better contribute to lifelong learning. The document explores concepts like activating prior knowledge, building understanding, and culminating learning. It also contrasts traditional versus more modern, facilitating approaches to teaching.
This document discusses developing social studies inquiry skills through concept attainment strategies. It provides examples of concepts taught in social studies like historical eras and core democratic values. Concept attainment engages students in developing concepts through identifying attributes, examples, comparisons, and generalizations. The strategy helps students organize facts and understand relationships between concepts in a way that facilitates deeper learning and ability to apply knowledge in new contexts.
The document discusses principles and methods for teaching mathematics. It covers:
1) The spiral progression approach which revisits math basics each grade level with increasing depth and breadth.
2) Principles like balancing standard-based and integrated approaches, using problem-solving, and assessment-driven instruction.
3) Bruner's three-tiered learning theory of enactive, iconic, and symbolic representation.
4) Teaching methods like problem-solving, concept attainment strategies, concept formation strategies, direct instruction, and experiential/constructivist approaches.
This document provides information on writing lesson objectives using Bloom's Taxonomy. It discusses Bloom's original and revised taxonomies, which classify learning objectives according to the type of learning involved - from basic recall or comprehension to more complex skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The document provides examples of verbs to use in writing objectives targeting different levels of learning. It also discusses best practices for writing clear, measurable objectives and assessing whether objectives were achieved.
Module 5 Engaging Students in Learning – Promoting Reflective InquiryMELINDA TOMPKINS
- The document discusses developing social studies inquiry skills through activities that engage students in investigating the social world and developing their knowledge of social studies concepts.
- It outlines developmental stages of inquiry skills from K-12, including asking questions, planning investigations, gathering and analyzing data, and communicating findings.
- Effective instruction allows students to interact, model skills, and transfer skills between contexts with practice over time.
The document discusses developing social studies inquiry skills through concept attainment strategies. It describes inquiry skills like classifying, predicting, observing, and measuring that help students develop explanations and understand concepts. Concept attainment involves identifying attributes of concepts, examples and non-examples, and relationships between concepts to build generalizations. The strategy scaffolds student understanding by having them uncover patterns in information.
The document discusses Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and how it was updated in the 1990s by Lorin Anderson to be more relevant for 21st century teaching and learning. The original six categories were changed from nouns to verbs and the structure was modified to emphasize its use for curriculum planning, instruction, and assessment. The updated taxonomy aims to better prepare students with skills like critical thinking, problem solving, and synthesis of ideas.
The document discusses Benjamin Bloom and his influential taxonomy of educational objectives, including his initial work developing the cognitive domain with Ralph Tyler. It describes revisions to Bloom's Taxonomy led by Lorin Anderson in the 1990s that updated the terminology to verb forms and restructured it for 21st century use in curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
This document discusses lesson planning and effective teaching strategies. It defines what a lesson plan is and outlines the typical components of a lesson plan, including the opening, introduction of new material, guided and independent practice, and closing. It also addresses how to write measurable objectives, ensure rigor and relevance, engage students, differentiate instruction, and select teaching strategies based on a rigor/relevance framework. The document emphasizes the importance of planning, preparing, setting clear objectives, and serving as a positive role model for students.
This document provides several strategies to support neurodiverse learners and improve learning for all students. It recommends reducing "catastrophic loss" in working memory through whole-class strategies. Specific strategies include using check sheets, listening frames, modeling, keyword displays, mind maps, and a "Wonder Wall" for student questions. The document emphasizes linking new knowledge to prior knowledge and students' interests. It also stresses the importance of multisensory learning techniques, building "stickability" or retention through visuals, activities, examples from students' lives, and incorporating left and right brain approaches. The overall goal is to make each lesson into a clear "learning journey" that helps students see connections and progress in their understanding.
This document discusses learning intentions and success criteria. It defines learning intentions as what students should know or be able to do by the end of a lesson. Success criteria describe how students can recognize their own success. The document provides examples of learning intentions and success criteria. It explains that sharing these with students helps students understand expectations and focus their learning.
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, which organizes thinking skills into six levels from basic to more complex. It provides an overview of the original taxonomy and changes made in the revision, including renaming categories from nouns to verbs and shifting emphasis to applications in curriculum planning. Productive Pedagogies are also mentioned, which aim to engage students in higher-order thinking for a greater portion of lessons.
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, which organizes thinking skills into six levels from basic to more complex. It provides an overview of the original taxonomy and changes made in the revision, including renaming categories from nouns to verbs and emphasizing explanation over lists. Examples are given of classroom activities and assessments for each of the six levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, which organizes thinking skills into six levels from basic to more complex. It provides an overview of the original taxonomy and changes made in the revision, including renaming categories from nouns to verbs and emphasizing explanation over lists. Examples are given of classroom activities and assessments for each of the six levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
This document discusses using images to aid learning and provides examples of strategies for doing so. It describes how images connect directly to long-term memory and help learners acquire knowledge in chunks by visualizing concepts. Several strategies are outlined for using images in the classroom, including using picture books to teach comprehension strategies, having students analyze photos to learn Bloom's Taxonomy, comparing and contrasting different images, and doing an "Image Detective" activity by posing and answering questions about photos. Both benefits and challenges of using teacher-created materials are presented.
Similar to Blooms taxonomy cognitive domain. MAJ ppt (20)
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Physiology and chemistry of skin and pigmentation, hairs, scalp, lips and nail, Cleansing cream, Lotions, Face powders, Face packs, Lipsticks, Bath products, soaps and baby product,
Preparation and standardization of the following : Tonic, Bleaches, Dentifrices and Mouth washes & Tooth Pastes, Cosmetics for Nails.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. Bloom's Taxonomy was
created by Benjamin Bloom
during the 1950s and is a
way to categorize the levels
of reasoning skills required in
classroom situations.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
3. Definition: Bloom's
Taxonomy refers to a
hierarchy of question
stems that teachers use
to guide their students
through the learning
process
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
4. "Taxonomy” simply means “classification”, so
the well-known taxonomy of learning
objectives is an attempt to classify forms and
levels of learning. It identifies three
“domains” of learning :
•Cognitive: mental skills (Knowledge)
•Affective: growth in feelings or emotional
areas (Attitude)
•Psychomotor: manual or physical skills
(Skills)
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
5. Three domains of learning:
• Benjamin Bloom
(Cognitive Domain),1956
• David Krathwohl
(Affective Domain), 1964
• Anita Harrow
(Psychomotor/Kinesthetic
Domain).1970
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
6. Factual Knowledge
The basic elements students must know to be acquainted with a
discipline or solve problems in it
Conceptual Knowledge
The interrelationships among the basic elements within a larger
structure that enable them to function together
Procedural Knowledge
How to do something, methods of inquiry, and criteria for using skills,
algorithms, techniques, and methods
Metacognitive Knowledge
Knowledge of cognition in general as well as awareness and knowledge
of one’s own cognition
THE KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION
9 / 9 / 2 0 2 1
D R M A R Y A N N E J Y R W A
8. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
• Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives
• 1950s- developed by Benjamin Bloom
• Means of expressing qualitatively different kinds of thinking
• Adapted for classroom use as a planning tool
• Continues to be one of the most universally applied models
• Provides a way to organise thinking skills into six levels, from the
most basic to the higher order levels of thinking
• 1990s- Lorin Anderson (former student of Bloom) revisited the
taxonomy
• As a result, a number of changes were made.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
9. Original Terms New Terms
• Evaluation
• Synthesis
• Analysis
• Application
• Comprehension
• Knowledge
•Creating
•Evaluating
•Analysing
•Applying
•Understanding
•Remembering
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
10. BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY
Creating
Generating new ideas, products, or ways of viewing things
Designing, constructing, planning, producing, inventing.
Evaluating
Justifying a decision or course of action
Checking, hypothesising, critiquing, experimenting, judging
Analysing
Breaking information into parts to explore understandings and relationships
Comparing, organising, deconstructing, interrogating, finding
Applying
Using information in another familiar situation
Implementing, carrying out, using, executing
Understanding
Explaining ideas or concepts
Interpreting, summarising, paraphrasing, classifying, explaining
Remembering
Recalling information
Recognising, listing, describing, retrieving, naming, finding
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
12. Change in Terms
• The names of six major categories were changed from noun to
verb forms.
• As the taxonomy reflects different forms of thinking and
thinking is an active process verbs were more accurate.
• The subcategories of the six major categories were also replaced
by verbs
• Some subcategories were reorganised.
• The knowledge category was renamed. Knowledge is a product
of thinking and was inappropriate to describe a category of
thinking and was replaced with the word remembering instead.
• Comprehension became understanding and synthesis was
renamed creating in order to better reflect the nature of the
thinking described by each category.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
13. Change in Emphasis
• More authentic tool for curriculum
planning, instructional delivery and
assessment.
• Aimed at a broader audience.
• Easily applied to all levels of schooling.
• The revision emphasises explanation and
description of subcategories.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
14. Remembering:
In this level, questions are asked solely to test
whether a student has gained specific
information from the lesson. For example, have
they memorized the dates for a particular war
or the names of the different clouds. It also
includes knowledge of the main ideas that are
being taught. You are probably writing
knowledge questions when you use words like
tell, list, label, name,define,name,identify, etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
15. Knowledge/Remembering
The learner is able to recall, restate and remember
learned information.
– Recognising
– Listing
– Describing
– Identifying
– Retrieving
– Naming
– Locating
– Finding
Can you recall information?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
16. Remembering: Potential Activities and
Products
• Make a story map showing the main events of the
story.
• Make a time line of your typical day.
• Make a concept map of the topic.
• Write a list of keywords you know about….
• What characters were in the story?
• Make a chart showing…
• Recite a poem you have learnt.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
17. Understanding:
This level of Bloom's Taxonomy has students go past
simply recalling facts and instead has them
understanding the information. With this level, they
will be able to interpret the facts. Instead of simply
being able to name the various types of clouds, for
example, the students would be able to understand
why each cloud has formed in that manner. You are
probably writing comprehension questions when you
use words like describe, contrast, discuss,
predict,explain,illustrate,compare, etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
18. Comprehension/Understanding
The learner grasps the meaning of information by
interpreting and translating what has been learned.
– Interpreting
– Exemplifying
– Summarising
– Inferring
– Paraphrasing
– Classifying
– Comparing
– Explaining
Can you explain ideas or concepts?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
19. Understanding: Potential Activities and
Products
• Write in your own words…
• Cut out, or draw pictures to illustrate a particular event in the story.
• Report to the class…
• Illustrate what you think the main idea may have been.
• Make a cartoon strip showing the sequence of events in the story.
• Write and perform a play based on the story.
• Write a brief outline to explain this story to someone else
• Explain why the character solved the problem in this particular way
• Write a summary report of the event.
• Prepare a flow chart to illustrate the sequence of events.
• Make a colouring book.
• Paraphrase this chapter in the book.
• Retell in your own words.
• Outline the main points.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
20. Applying:
Application questions are those where students
have to actually apply, or use, the knowledge
they have learned. They might be asked to solve
a problem with the information they have
gained in class being necessary to create a
viable solution. For example, a student might be
asked to solve a legal question using the
Constitution and its amendments. You are
probably writing application questions when
you use words like complete, solve, examine,
illustrate, show, etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
21. Applying
The learner makes use of information in a context different
from the one in which it was learned.
– Implementing
– Carrying out
– Using
– Executing
Can you use the information in another
familiar situation?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
22. Applying: Potential Activities and Products
• Construct a model to demonstrate how it looks or works
• Practise a play and perform it for the class
• Make a diorama to illustrate an event
• Write a diary entry
• Make a scrapbook about the area of study.
• Prepare invitations for a character’s birthday party
• Make a topographic map
• Take and display a collection of photographs on a particular topic.
• Make up a puzzle or a game about the topic.
• Write an explanation about this topic for others.
• Dress a doll in national costume.
• Make a clay model…
• Paint a mural using the same materials.
• Continue the story…
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
23. Analysing:
In this level, students will be required to go
beyond knowledge and application and actually
see patterns that they can use to analyze a
problem. For example, an English teacher might
ask what the motives were behind the
protagonist's actions during a novel. This
requires students to analyze the character and
come to a conclusion based on this analysis. You
are probably writing analysis questions when
you use words like analyze, explain, investigate,
infer, etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
24. Analysing
The learner breaks learned information into its parts to best
understand that information.
– Comparing
– Organising
– Deconstructing
– Attributing
– Outlining
– Finding
– Structuring
– Integrating
Can you break information into parts to explore
understandings and relationships?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
25. Analysing: Potential Activities and Products
• Design a questionnaire to gather information.
• Survey classmates to find out what they think about a particular
topic. Analyse the results.
• Make a flow chart to show the critical stages.
• Classify the actions of the characters in the book
• Construct a graph to illustrate selected information.
• Make a family tree showing relationships.
• Devise a role-play about the study area.
• Write a biography of a person studied.
• Prepare a report about the area of study.
• Conduct an investigation to produce information to support a
view.
• Review a work of art in terms of form, colour and texture.
• Draw a graph
• Complete a Decision Making Matrix to help you decide which
breakfast cereal to purchase
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
26. Evaluation:
The top level of Bloom's Taxonomy is
evaluation. Here students are expected
to assess information and come to a
conclusion such as its value or the bias
behind it. You are probably writing
evaluation questions when you use
words like select, judge, debate,
recommend, etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
27. Evaluating
The learner makes decisions based on in-depth
reflection, criticism and assessment.
– Checking
– Hypothesising
– Critiquing
– Experimenting
– Judging
– Testing
– Detecting
– Monitoring
Can you justify a decision or course of action?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
28. Evaluating: Potential Activities and
Products
• Write a letter to the editor
• Prepare and conduct a debate
• Prepare a list of criteria to judge…
• Write a persuasive speech arguing for/against…
• Make a booklet about five rules you see as important. Convince
others.
• Form a panel to discuss viewpoints on….
• Write a letter to. ..advising on changes needed.
• Write a half-yearly report.
• Prepare a case to present your view about...
• Evaluate the character’s actions in the story
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
29. Creating:
With Creating, students are required to use the
given facts to create new theories or make
predictions. They might have to pull in
knowledge from multiple subjects and
synthesize this information before coming to a
conclusion. For example, if a student is asked to
invent a new product or game they are being
asked to Create. You are probably writing
synthesis/Creating questions when you use
words like invent, imagine, create, compose,
etc.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
30. Creating
The learner creates new ideas and information using
what has been previously learned.
– Designing
– Constructing
– Planning
– Producing
– Inventing
– Devising
– Making
Can you generate new products, ideas, or ways of
viewing things?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
31. Creating: Potential Activities and Products
• Invent a machine to do a specific task.
• Design a robot to do your homework.
• Create a new product. Give it a name and plan a marketing campaign.
• Write about your feelings in relation to...
• Write a TV show play, puppet show, role play, song or pantomime
about..
• Design a new monetary system Eg...Rupee symbol
• Develop a menu for a new restaurant using a variety of healthy foods
• Design a record, book or magazine cover for...
• Sell an idea...Eg. Start up
• Devise a way to...
• Make up a new language and use it in an example
• Write a jingle to advertise a new product.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
32. Blooming Questions
• Questioning should be used purposefully to achieve
well-defines goals.
• Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of thinking
organised by level of complexity. It gives teachers
and students an opportunity to learn and practice a
range of thinking and provides a simple structure for
many different kinds of questions and thinking.
• The taxonomy involves all categories of questions.
• Typically a teacher would vary the level of questions
within a single lesson.
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
33. Lower and Higher Order Questions
• Lower level questions are those at the remembering,
understanding and lower level application levels of
the taxonomy.
• Usually questions at the lower levels are appropriate
for:
• Evaluating students’ preparation and
comprehension
• Diagnosing students’ strengths and weaknesses
• Reviewing and/or summarising content
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
34. Lower and Higher Order Questions
• Higher level questions are those requiring complex
application, analysis, evaluation or creation skills.
• Questions at higher levels of the taxonomy are
usually most appropriate for:
• Encouraging students to think more deeply and
critically
• Problem solving
• Encouraging discussions
• Stimulating students to seek information on their
own
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
35. Questions for Remembering
• What happened after...?
• How many...?
• What is...?
• Who was it that...?
• Can you name ...?
• Find the definition of…
• Describe what happened after…
• Who spoke to...?
• Which is true or false...?
(
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
36. Questions for Understanding
• Can you explain why…?
• Can you write in your own words?
• How would you explain…?
• Can you write a brief outline...?
• What do you think could have happened next...?
• Who do you think...?
• What was the main idea...?
• Can you clarify…?
• Can you illustrate…?
• Does everyone act in the way that …….. does?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
37. Questions for Applying
• Do you know of another instance where…?
• Can you group by characteristics such as…?
• Which factors would you change if…?
• What questions would you ask of…?
• From the information given, can you develop a
set of instructions about…?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
38. Question for Analysing
• Which events could not have happened?
• If. ..happened, what might the ending have been?
• How is...similar to...?
• What do you see as other possible outcomes?
• Why did...changes occur?
• Can you explain what must have happened when...?
• What are some or the problems of...?
• Can you distinguish between...?
• What were some of the motives behind..?
• What was the turning point?
• What was the problem with...?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
39. Questions for Evaluating
• Is there a better solution to...?
• Judge the value of... What do you think about...?
• Can you defend your position about...?
• Do you think...is a good or bad thing?
• How would you have handled...?
• What changes to.. would you recommend?
• Do you believe...? How would you feel if. ..?
• How effective are. ..?
• What are the consequences..?
• What influence will....have on our lives?
• What are the pros and cons of....?
• Why is ....of value?
• What are the alternatives?
• Who will gain & who will loose?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
40. Questions for Creating.
• Can you design a...to...?
• Can you see a possible solution to...?
• If you had access to all resources, how would you
deal with...?
• Why don't you devise your own way to...?
• What would happen if ...?
• How many ways can you...?
• Can you create new and unusual uses for...?
• Can you develop a proposal which would...?
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa
41. A good teacher makes
you think even when
you don’t want to.
(Fisher, 1998, Teaching Thinking)
9/9/2021 Dr Mary Anne Jyrwa