This document provides information on transmission and distribution (T&D) losses and Aggregate Technical and Commercial (AT&C) losses in the Indian power sector from 2001-2004. Some key points: - T&D losses were historically overstated due to issues in accounting, and AT&C losses provide a clearer measure of efficiency by accounting for technical, commercial and collection losses. - Many states showed improvements over this period, with some reducing AT&C losses below 25%, while others remained above 50%. Reform efforts focused on metering, energy auditing and establishing regulatory commissions. - The Accelerated Power Development and Reforms Programme was launched to strengthen infrastructure and provide incentives to reduce cash losses from

1. Orissa
Nagaland
1
W.B.
Uttaranchal
U.P.
Tripura
T.N.
Sikkim
Rajasthan
Punjab
17.16
25.96
31.01
35.17
34.12
49.23
46.44
43.74
41.44
45.54
57.09
54.99
55
55.54
60
Mizoram
16.73
20
Meghalaya
32.07
45.05
43.66
42.55
65.18
70
Manipur
21.63
23.29
25.35
22.78
24.2
36.68
NationalAverage
32. 53 %
Maharashtra
M.P.
Kerala
Karnataka
Jharkhand
J&K
H.P.
Haryana
Gujarat
Goa
Delhi
Chattisgarh
Bihar
39.31
40
Assam
47.54
50
Arunachal
27.73
30
A.P.
State-wise T&D Loss (%) 2003-04
10

2. 21.41
21.13
93-94
94-95
2
32.54
32.53
03-04
33.98
32.86
30.93
02-03
01-02
00-01
99-00
26.45
24.79
97-98
98-99
24.53
96-97
22.27
21.8
92-93
95-96
22.83
91-92
T&D LOSS IN THE COUNTRY
(In %)
(Source : CEA)

3. ANOMALIES IN T&D
LOSS COMPUTATION
• In absence of feeder metering in the past, substantial portion of
T&D loss, including theft of electricity gets attributed to
agricultural consumption. While, agricultural consumption is
around 20-25%, utilities were showing it as 35-40% and
correspondingly T&D losses shown as 20-25%.
• Also, T&D loss was being computed taking into account electricity
bills issued to consumers as accrued income & not on actual
collection. Therefore, T&D loss figures did not capture the major
gap between the billing and the collection, apart from large amount
of theft.
• To get over this problem, concept of Aggregate Technical &
Commercial (AT&C) loss was introduced.
3

4. AT&C LOSS
 It is the difference between units input into the system and the units
for which the payment is collected.
 T&D Loss do not capture losses on account of non-realisation of
payments.
 AT&C Loss is the clearest measure of overall efficiency of the
distribution business as it measures technical as well as commercial
losses.
 AT&C Loss(%) = (Energy Input – Energy Realised)X100
Energy Input
 Energy Realised = Energy Billed X Collection Efficiency
 Collection Efficiency (%) = Amount Realised X100
Amount Billed
4

5. 2002-03
2003-04
5
JVVNL (Rajasthan)
Chattisgarh
HESCOM
(Karnataka)
Tripura
Gujarat
BESCOM
(Karnataka)
Kerala
2001-02
MESCOM
(Karnataka)
Meghalaya
Punjab
APCPDCL
Tamilnadu
APEPDCL
APSPDCL
APNPDCL
23
22
19
24
28
32
31
29
27
26
39
41
41
41
59
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %

6. 2002-03
2003-04
6
Pashchimanchal
VVNL (U.P.)
Poorvanchal VVNL
(U.P.)
DHBVNL (Haryana)
Goa
WESCO (Orissa)
BRPL
NDPL (Delhi)
2001-02
Madhyanchal VVNL
(U.P.)
AVVNL (Rajasthan)
Maharashtra
GESCOM(Karnataka)
Uttaranchal
JDVVNL (Rajasthan)
West Bengal
Pondicherry
0
35
41
41
39
49
47
47
49
48
48
47
46
53
57
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %

7. 2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
7
Himachal Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Sikkim
Manipur
Mizoram
Bihar
Jammu& Kashmir
Jharkhand
Nagaland
Dakshinachal
VVNL (U.P.)
Assam
BYPL
UHBVNL
(Haryana)
Madhya Pradesh
SESCO (Orissa)
CESCO(Orissa)
NESCO (Orissa)
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %

8. AT&C LOSS BELOW 25%
State/Utility
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
APNPDCL
26.14
26.84
10.41
APSPDCL
24.45
27.26
17.17
APEPDCL
27.29
19.32
17.79
Tamilnadu
19.26
20.50
18.00
APCPDCL
28.80
29.68
19.12
Punjab
27.66
26.52
22.39
Meghalaya
21.64
24.97
24.20
8

9. Utilities With AT&C Loss between 25-50%
State/Utility
MESCOM (Kar)
Kerala
BESCOM (Kar)
Tripura
Gujarat
HESCOM (Kar)
Chattisgarh
JVVNL (Raj)
Pondicherry
JDVVNL (Raj)
GESCOM (Kar)
Maharashtra
AVVNL (Raj)
MVVNL (UP)
NDPL (Del)
BRPL (Del)
WESCO (Or)
Goa
DHBVNL (Har)
PoVVNL (UP)
PaVVNL (UP)
2001-02
40.50
30.76
40.50
32.10
23.28
40.50
39.03
59.31
38.97
52.77
40.50
45.70
49.04
46.92
48.10
48.10
57.18
48.52
40.69
46.92
46.92
2002-03
2003-04
26.66
29.08
26.05
34.17
31.24
34.35
37.47
40.11
41.67
42.17
31.01
45.13
41.42
31.78
47.79
47.40
47.30
46.38
39.75
31.78
31.78
9
26.01
27.44
29.20
31.05
31.05
31.82
35.40
38.62
41.01
41.56
43.74
44.18
44.57
44.57
44.86
45.07
46.18
48.39
48.68
48.82
49.70

10. Utilities With More Than 50% AT&C Loss
State/Utility
CESCO (Orissa)
SESCO (Orissa)
BYPL (Delhi)
Assam
M.P.
UHBVNL (Haryana)
DVVNL (U.P.)
Nagaland
Jharkhand
J&K
Bihar
Mizoram
Manipur
Sikkim
2001-02
63.64
52.80
57.2
36.95
40.32
45.92
46.92
61.00
63.29
69.10
79.74
74.35
81.37
2002-03
55.04
49.76
61.89
37.53
49.92
42.82
31.78
57.86
53.00
61.71
68.64
75.15
76.88
80.5
2003-04
51.10
51.56
54.29
54.41
52.56
52.84
59.30
59.76
65.00
67.58
68.50
72.41
72.62
78.27
10

11. (Source:Plg. Comm/ PFC)
11
Fig Rs. in Crore
03-04
02-03
01-02
2K-01
99-2K
98-99
97-98
96-97
95-96
93-94
93-94
92-93
91-92
6125
5060
4560
3000
8770
13963
11305
20623
21064
20860
27068
25259
26353
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LOSSES OF
SEBs/UTILITIES
(WITHOUT SUBSIDY)

12. TOTAL LOSS OF UTILITIES W/O SUBSIDY
(% OF TURN OVER)
41.29
37.17
33.00
24.61
26.22
24.57
15.79
13.59
96-97
97-98
98-99
(Source : Plng. Comm./PFC)
99-00
00-01
01-02
02-03
12
03-04

13. ACS, ARR & REVENUE GAP
(Power Input Basis)
250
225
39.00
71.03
175
150
125
100
ACS
ARR
13
2003-04
2002-03
2001-02
2000-01
1999-00
1998-99
1997-98
1996-97
75
1995-96
Paise
200

14. REASONS FOR AT&C LOSSES
•
Technical Losses:
–
–
–
–
–
•
Overloading of existing lines and substation equipments
Absence of up gradation of old lines and equipments
Low HT: LT ratio
Poor repair and Maintenance of equipments
Non-installation of sufficient capacitors
Commercial Losses:
–
–
–
–
Low metering/billing/collection efficiency
Theft & Pilferage and tampering of meters
Low accountability of employees
Absence of Energy Accounting & Auditing
14
Contd..

15. ONE OF THE MAIN REASON FOR INCREASE IN
LOSSES IN THE SECTOR IS LOW INVESTMENT IN
THE T&D IN COMPARISON TO THE GENERATION.
1.4
1.2
Investment in generation and T&D including RE should be 1:1
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1st
PLAN
T&D + RE
2nd
PLAN
3rd Three
PLAN Ann
4th
5th Annual 6th
PLAN PLAN Plan PLAN
7th Annual Annula 8th
PLAN Plan Plan PLAN
INVESTMENT/EXPENDITURE ON T&D AND RE Vs
15
INVESTMENT/EXPENDITURE ON GENERATION
9th
PLAN

16. INITIATIVES TAKEN BY MINISTRY
FOR REDUCTION OF AT&C LOSS
1. CHIEF MINISTERS’ CONFERENCE:
Held in March 2001.
Main resolutions:
(A) Energy audit at all 11kV feeders:
97% feeder metering achieved.
(B) Full metering of all consumers:
87% consumer metering achieved.
Majority of un-metered connections
belong to flat rate category
16
Contd..

17. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
C) SERC:
23 states constituted and 4 states notified.
18 SERCs have issued tariff orders
D) Commercial Viability to be achieved through
• Profit Centre:
13 SEBs/EDs unbundled & corporatised. 9 are expected
shortly.
• Franchisees:
Adopted With different models in Assam, Karnataka, Orissa &
Nagaland and under active consideration of Andhra, Gujarat,
Bihar, W. Bengal.
• Privatisation :
• Delhi & Orissa. Uttar Pradesh has invited EOIs.
17

18. STATUS OF REFORMS
STATE
SERC
Number of
T/O by SERC
Feeder Metering
(%)
Consumer Metering
(%)
Energy Audit
initiated
Andhra Pradesh
1999
6
100
91
√
Delhi
1999
4
100
100
√
Gujarat
1998
2
100
93
√
Maharashtra
1999
3
100
87
√
U.P.
1998
5
100
91
T.N.
1999
1
100
81
√
W.B.
1999
3
100
97
√
Karnataka
1999
4
100
82
√
Haryana
1998
3
100
92
H.P.
2001
2
90
100
Goa
2002
100
97
√
Assam
2001
2
100
90
√
Punjab
1999
3
100
84
√
Rajasthan
1999
2
100
94
√
Jharkhand
2003
1
86
75
√
18

19. STATUS OF REFORMS
STATE
SERC
Const.
Number of
T/O by SERC
Feeder Metering
(%)
Consumer Metering
(%)
Energy Audit
Initiated
Uttaranchal
2002
2
100
92
√
Orissa
1996
5
95
81
M.P.
1998
3
100
72
Kerala
2002
1
100
100
Bihar
2005
41
50
√
Tripura
2004
100
81
√
Chattisgarh
2001
91
68
J&K
2004
95
40
Sikkim
Notified
49
87
Manipur
Notified
21
82
Meghalaya
Notified
100
50
Mizoram
Notified
92
96
Nagaland
50
61
Arunachal
0
46
1
19
√

20. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
2.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
States were to sign MOU for assistance from Govt of India and
mandate taking up reforms in the power sector. Key parameters are :
Obligation of the State Government
Setting up of SERC & Rationalisation of Tariffs
Reorganisation of State Electricity Boards
Metering of 11 kV feeders & of all consumers
Energy Audit at all level
100% Electrification of villages and hamlets
Support from Government of India
Supply of additional power wherever feasible: 4000 MW allocated to various states
Assistance for distribution system: APDRP
Funding for 100% rural electrification: Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana
Strengthening & improvement of transmission network by POWERGRID:
2990 Ckt. Km added during 2004-05
Concessional financing by PFC: Interest rate for distribution work @ 8.25%
20
Contd..

21. INITIATIVES TAKEN…..
3. Accelerated Power Development &
Reforms Programme
The programme aims at :




Reduction of AT&C losses
Bring about Commercial viability
Reduce outages & interruptions
Increase consumer satisfaction
The programme has two components:
INVESTMENT COMPONENT covers strengthening and
upgradation of sub-transmission & distribution
INCENTIVE COMPONENT is a grant for states / Utilities
towards reduction of cash losses with 2000-01 as the base
21
year

22. 2003-04
Sanctions
2004-05
Releases
2005-06
Utilisation
Year Wise cumulative status of APDRP (As on 31.05.2005)
22
7166
5541
6709
5541
19489
4113
3306
16603
1756
587
14704
2002-03
19489
INITIATIVES TAKEN…..
Investment Component

23. Investment Growth in Power Sector
• As per the report of Economic Intelligence ServiceDec. 2004, the growth in power sector during the
previous year was 27.3% (as of Oct ’04) which includes
growth in generation 23% and in distribution 53%.
• The overall investment in Power Sector was Rs.
5,37,885 Cr. compared to Rs. 4,22,246 Cr. last year.
Whereas, the investment in distribution sector was Rs.
21,072 Cr. as compared to Rs. 13,764 Cr. last year.
Source: CMIE
23

24. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
Incentive Component
Sl. Name of States Year
Reduction in Eligibility
Incentive
Cash Loss
for Incentive Released
1.
Gujarat
2001-02
472.76
236.38
236.38
2.
Haryana
2001-02
210.98
105.49
105.49
3.
Maharashtra
2001-02
275.78
137.89
137.89
4.
Rajasthan
2001-02
275.42
137.71
137.71
5.
Andhra Pradesh
2002-03
530.22
265.11
265.11
6.
West Bengal
2002-03
146.00
73.00
73.00
2003-04
605.52
302.76
302.76
2002-03
129.88
64.94
64.94
2942.66
1323.28
1323.28
7. Kerala
Total
Incentive claims of Gujarat & Punjab are pending for release with MOF
24
Contd..

25. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
4.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)
UNDER APDRP
•The Main features are:
 Constitution of Distribution Reform Committee for
monitoring of reforms, APDRP implementation etc.
 100% feeder & consumer metering
 Energy accounting and auditing
 Setting up of performance benchmark parameters
 Policy for franchisee & outsourcing
 Turnkey execution of APDRP schemes
 Operation of circle & feeder as profit centre
25
Contd..

26. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
Theft Control
5.
ANTI-THEFT
PROVISIONS
IN
ELECTRICITY
ACT- 2003 (Sec:135-137, 153)
– Provides legal frame work for making theft
of electricity a Cognizable offence.
–
States to set up special courts & special
police stations
– To
provide
special
powers
to
utility
personnel for checking the installations.
26
Contd..

27. ACTION TAKEN BY STATES FOR THEFT CONTROL
STATE
Implementation Of
theft provisions of
Electricity Act ‘03
A.P
Yes
Chattisgarh
Yes
Spl. Police
Stations
Yes
Theft cases
detected (Nos)
Cases
convicted (Nos)
Yes
Delhi
Special
courts
342620
Yes
81.89
30
Gujarat
Yes
Haryana
Yes
0.21
48510
Yes
50.75
30350
H.P
1656
239
0.15
3846
Yes
Yes
Yes
107
3.20
26606
35.98
3195
Kerala
12.82
63.45
M.P
Yes
Yes
271094
Maharashtra
Yes
Yes
15288
Orissa
Yes
Yes
186
15.66
Yes
Punjab
Rajasthan
13.09
Yes
Jharkhand
Karnataka
38.11
9.17
Goa
J&K
7286
Amount realised
(In Cr.)
195641
Yes
Yes
Tamilnadu
Uttar Pradesh
Yes
Yes
Yes
West Bengal
Yes
Yes
46.00
23.80
Yes
Uttaranchal
9408
209112
Yes
104.93
4.40
109
Yes
2348
27
0.01
2.46

28. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
6.
Consumer Indexing for Energy audit
7.
11 kv Feeder Management required for Energy Audit
8.
IT Initiatives to improve efficiency in metering, billing &
collection
9.
Installation of Capacitors to improve power factor
10. High Voltage Distribution
System (HVDS) for preventing
theft and pilferage, better power management
11. Consumer Care for improved consumer satisfaction – to
attend consumer grievances regarding metering, billing, no
power supply
28

29. Other Initiatives By Utilities
STATE
Feeder
Mgmt.
Initiated
Consumer
Indexing
started
Consumer
Care Centre
started
Spot
Billing
initiated
Computerised
Billing
started
HVDS
SCADA under
impl.
A.P.
√
√
√
√
√
√
Hyderabad
Delhi
√
√
√
√
√
√
NDPL
Gujarat
√
√
√
√
√
√
Vadodara
Maharashtra
√
√
√
√
√
√
BEST, BSES
U.P.
√
√
√
√
√
√
T.N.
√
√
√
W.B.
√
√
√
Karnataka
√
√
√
Haryana
√
√
√
H.P.
Goa
√
Chennai
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
29

30. Other Initiatives By Utilities
STATE
Feeder
Mgmt.
Initiated
Consumer
Indexing
started
Consumer
Care Centre
started
Spot
Billing
initiated
Computerised
Billing started
Assam
√
√
√
√
√
Punjab
√
√
√
Rajasthan
√
√
√
√
√
Jharkhand
Uttaranchal
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
Kerala
√
√
Jaipur
√
M.P.
SCADA
under impl.
√
Orissa
HVDS
√
Bihar
Tripura
√
√
Trivendrum
√
√
√
J&K
30

31. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
12. WORKSHOP ON BEST PRACTICES
•
3 days National level workshop in Dec. 2004 on Best
Practices adopted by State utilities in distribution sector was
organised covering consumer indexing, metering, billing,
revenue management, maintenance, project execution, quality
management, IT enabling, outsourcing, loss reduction, MIS,
customer satisfaction, HR initiatives etc.
13. CAPACITY BUILDING:
•
Training of utility personnel undertaken to
upgrade
knowledge in the areas of project formulation, project
management, operation & maintenance etc. PMI (NTPC) &
NPTI have trained more than 1800 personnel from various
utilities.
•
Training of 25,000 utility personnel has been taken up under
DRUM Project in association with USAID. More than 350
31
personnel have been already trained
Contd..

32. State-wise participation In
PMI Training Programmes
Sl
State
Total
Sl
Participants
Total
Participants
State
1
Gujarat
324
13
Kerala
38
2
Maharashtra
178
14
Himachal Pradesh
29
3
Madhya Pradesh
143
15
Chattisgarh
27
4
West Bengal
120
16
Andhra Pradesh
27
5
Rajasthan
117
17
Uttaranchal
18
6
Punjab
101
18
Meghalaya
16
7
Bihar
79
19
A&N
08
8
Karnataka
78
20
J&K
07
9
Tamilnadu
66
21
Jharkhand
07
10
Assam
57
22
Uttar Pradesh
06
11
Haryana
47
12
Goa
38
23
Nagaland
03
32

33. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
14. Distribution Reform Upgrades & Management
(DRUM) Project: In collaboration with USAID
•
To adopt best commercial and technological practices to
improve quality and reliability of last mile power distribution
in 4 pilots projects in urban and rural areas.
•
•
Delhi,
•
Anand (Gujarat) &
•
•
Aurangabad (Maharashtra),
Doddballapura (Karnataka)
Financial assistance of US $ 20 million.
33

34. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
15. RANKING OF UTILITIES:
To evaluate performance of utilities and to assess their
improvements. CRISIL & ICRA engaged
 Parameters
o External:
 State Govt. related
:
19 points
 SERC related
:
13 points
o Internal:
 Business Risk Analysis :
27 points
 Financial Risk Analysis
:
20 points
o Attaining commercial viability :
16 points
o IT adoption etc
:
05 points
Total
:
100 Points
–
Three Reports released
•
•
•
JAN 2003,
JAN 2004 AND
MARCH 2005
34
Contd..

35. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
RANKING OF UTILITIES
State
(Source ICRA/CRISIL)
Mar 2005
Points
Jan 2004
Rank
Points
Rank
Andhra Pradesh
57.03
1
56.75
2
Gujarat
Delhi
Karnataka
Tamilnadu
Goa
Himachal Pradesh
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Chattisgarh
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Punjab
Haryana
53.61
51.91
51.46
50.94
50.45
49.91
44.60
42.14
39.91
37.50
37.25
36.82
35.16
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
50.99
57.00
51.25
39.63
43.20
44.16
40.89
40.85
13.83
41.83
37.75
46.00
49.63
4
1
3
12
8
7
10
11
22
9
13
6
5
35
Contd..

36. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
RANKING OF UTILITIES
State
(Source ICRA/CRISIL)
Mar 2005
Points
Jan 2004
Rank
Points
Rank
Tripura
Kerala
Assam
Meghalaya
Madhya Pradesh
Sikkim
Uttaranchal
Nagaland
Orissa
Jammu & Kashmir
Arunachal Pradesh
Mizoram
Manipur
Bihar
31.65
31.48
27.32
26.72
22.79
19.07
18.60
15.80
13.63
9.43
9.20
7.88
6.55
5.78
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.60
34.25
27.43
23.03
24.75
15.87
37.75
14.13
20.31
8.50
9.05
10.80
- 11.90
10.63
23
15
16
18
17
20
14
21
19
27
26
24
29
25
Jharkhand
3.00
29
0.00
28
There has been change in rating parameters in 2004 & 05 exercise with respect
to 2003 as earlier parameters were not capturing total performance.
36
Contd..

37. INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
16.
RELIABILITY INDEX (RI):
The Reliability Index of the power supply is being monitored for
select towns at 11kV feeder level. RI at Distribution transformer
level and consumer level to be established subsequently.
17.
MONITORING BY MINISTRY OF POWER:
• APDRP Steering committee: 8 meetings held
•
Frequent Reviews of Utilities at Regional/State level by
Minister, Secretary (Power) & JS (D);
• Review by state level Distribution Reform Committees;
• NTPC, POWERGRID & CEA for monitoring at the field level
• Dedicated APDRP Cell in the Ministry
37

38. AT&C LOSS: BEST 15 TOWNS (%)
Town
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Salem ( urban)`
9.45
9.28
7.52
Tiruchengode
8.92
8.86
7.79
Sherilingampally
9.28
8.36
7.83
Kakinada
8.92
7.61
7.98
Uppal
8.13
8.11
8.00
18.68
8.13
8.02
Kapra
8.07
8.07
8.04
Amalapuram
8.87
6.66
8.13
Chennai
8.68
8.59
8.22
Adilabad
44.56
19.82
8.23
8.35
8.35
8.30
Edapady
14.10
11.25
8.52
Bheemili
15.60
5.85
9.54
Erode (Urban)
10.48
11.33
9.95
Nizamabad
23.28
12.21
10.68
Ludhiana (West)
Malkajigiri
38

39. AT&C LOSS: WORST 15 TOWNS (%)
Sl.
Town
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
1
Jamtara
83.33
81.26
80.35
2
Garwha
82.30
82.10
76.15
3
Latehar
75.58
75.66
74.54
4
Aizwal
88.39
77.08
73.70
5
Pakur
74.14
72.99
71.89
6
Naharlagun
84.27
71.37
7
Osmanabad
76.70
75.98
69.04
8
Daltonganj
80.03
66.00
68.20
9
Darbhanga
67.57
10
Pesu (West)
66.73
11
Sahibganj
12
Gaya
13
Dumka
69.86
65.27
62.30
14
Chhatarpur
62.09
40.16
60.01
15
Roorkee
52.50
53.93
59.85
69.67
70.32
66.23
63.35
39

40. AT&C LOSSES OF PRIVATE DISCOMS (%)
SL.
DISCOM
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
-
10.49
-
-
11.32
1
NOIDA POWER (UP)
2
BSES (Maharashtra)
3
CESC (W. B.)
19.60
18.00
17.16
4
BYPL (Delhi)
61.89
54.29
33.79
5
WESCO (ORISSA)
47.30
46.18
40.60
6
BRPL (Delhi)
47.40
45.07
40.64
7
NESCO (ORISSA)
52.25
50.36
42.96
8
SOUTHCO (ORISSA)
49.76
51.56
45.71
9
CESCO (ORISSA)
55.04
51.10
49.37
10
NDPL (Delhi)
47.79
44.86
50.12
11
AEC (GUJRAT)
18.74
16.68
-
12
SEC (GUJRAT)
14.23
12.98
-

41. DT FAILURE RATE: BEST 15 TOWNS (%)
Town
Sl.
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
1
Kakinada
0.70
0.65
0.63
2
Chengleputtu
6.00
4.00
0.68
3
Rajahmundry
0.93
0.87
0.82
4
Anakapalli
2.50
1.50
1.00
5
Anantapur
1.00
1.00
1.00
6
Alappuzha
4.00
3.00
1.00
7
Kollam
3.00
2.00
1.00
8
Kozhikkode
3.00
2.00
1.00
9
Bhusawal
8.00
8.00
1.00
10
Coimbatore (Metro)
2.10
1.03
11
Kancheepuram
1.80
1.11
1.06
12
Trichy
2.17
1.78
1.08
13
Kadiri
7.76
8.16
1.60
14
Tiruchengode
4.62
1.30
1.80
15
Vijaywada
2.35
1.93
41

42. DT FAILURE RATE: WORST 15 TOWNS (%)
Town
Sl.
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
1
Daltonganj
26.00
27.00
26.00
2
Ramchandrapuram
22.42
21.69
21.66
3
Suryapet
25.68
27.45
20.11
4
Nandayal
30.00
20.00
20.00
5
Deogarh
34.46
19.58
6
Jalgaon
14.51
19.48
7
Roorkee
20.59
15.74
19.10
8
Warangal
25.60
18.20
19.04
9
Latur
19.20
19.27
18.30
10
Surat
11
Alwar
28.93
34.04
17.76
12
Mysore
21.17
19.90
17.53
13
Kapra
21.60
20.80
17.50
14
Yellandu
30.00
15
Dhanbad
17.00
18.00
15.20
16.00
15.00
42

43. OUTAGE DURATION PER FEEDER (IN MIN.)
Sl.
Town
1.
Mumbai (BSES)
2.
Kolkata
3.
No. of
11kV
feeders
Outage
Duration
Per Feeder
590
5.88
1138
19.19
Thane
43
22.44
3.
Thiruvanthapuram
53
27.28
4.
Surat
309
27.35
5.
Jabalpur
65
30.35
6.
Mulund
27
33.51
7.
Ahmedabad
664
40.57
8.
Trichy
32
41.06
9.
Coimbatore
50
46.28
10.
Bhandup
39
64.98
11.
Chennai
665
67.74
12.
Madurai
39
67.75
13.
Vishakapatnam
73
76.37
14.
Amritsar
115
162.53
15.
Hyderabad
464
163.41
43
Mar 2005

44. TOTAL No. of TRIPPINGS Best 15 towns
March 2005
Sl.
Town
1.
Vishakapatnam
2.
Surat
3.
Trivandurm
3.
Thane
4.
Bhandup
5.
Trichy
6.
Mulund
7.
Madurai
8.
Kolkata
9.
Mumbai (sub)
10.
Ahmedabad
11.
Raipur
12.
Jabalpur
13.
Coimbatore
14.
Delhi
15.
Vijaywada
No. of 11kV
feeders
73
309
53
43
39
32
27
39
1138
590
664
65
65
50
548
63
44
No. of
Trippings
47
48
62
64
72
88
93
107
146
185
224
273
307
339
606
744

45. 45