Researchers used RNA-seq to analyze gene expression in the blueberry cultivar 'Arlen' and the pathogen Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi that causes mummy berry disease. They extracted RNA from different tissues of 'Arlen' and assembled a transcriptome of 49,803 contigs. A higher percentage of reads from infected fruit mapped to the M. vaccinii-corymbosi genome assembly compared to uninfected tissues. Principal component analysis showed infected and uninfected tissues clustered separately based on gene expression levels in the blueberry reference genome. Differentially expressed genes between the groups may be involved in mummy berry infection or resistance.
Software Entomology or Where Do Bugs Come From?Noah Sussman
An internal training talk that Michelle D'Netto and I periodically give for Customer Support representatives at Etsy. Introduces advanced Software Quality concepts such as the halting problem, the impossibility of complete testing and the extreme difficulty of discovering all of the significant bugs in one's own software. Winds up by encouraging anyone responsible for online customer experience, to envision themselves as a participant observer embedded in the rapidly-evolving culture of the Web.
Hi there,
This was topic on which I presented a talk in our department. As we know Insecticide such as pyrethroids are being most widely used for controlling insect pest in agriculture because of their safe, cheap, effective and long-lasting nature (Bulter et al. 2011). However, the widespread development of insecticide resistance, especially resistance to pyrethroid and the fact that resistance to an insecticide generally confers cross-resistance to other insecticides has become a serious problem challenging the control of agriculturally, economically, and medically important insect pests and resulting in increase of insect vector-borne diseases in many parts of the world (Zaim 2002; Bulter 2011). Three major mechanisms are involved in insecticide resistance: (1) increased metabolic detoxification of insecticides; (2) decreased sensitivity of the target proteins on which an insecticide acts, known as target site insensitivity; and (3) decreased cuticular penetration/or increased sequestration/storage.
Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt)Cry protein is one of the most effective biopesticides that can act against a large group of insect orders like Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera etc. But through the course of evolution insects have developed resistance so that they can combat against Bt. Mutation(s) in the target site; reduced protease activity; sequestration of toxin molecules; mutations in the ABCC2 transporter protein are few mechanisms which govern resistance in insects against Cry protein. Therefore, it has become prime importance to understand the molecular basis of insect resistance and what could be the strategies by which the efficacy of the Cry protein can be enhanced. The strategies for improving the efficacy of Cry toxin are (i) Expression of chitinase gene along with Cry toxins; (ii) Expression of hybrid toxin; (iii) Introduction of intramolecular cleavage sites. The insects have developed resistance against different groups of Cry proteins such as Cry2Aa, Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab etc. But the relative fitness (such as larval and pupal weight, pupal duration, and survival rate, etc.) in resistant larvae is much lower than the susceptible larvae because of genetic changes in insects. One of such genes that affects the relative fitness in Helicoverpa armigera is death associated LIM only protein (Ha-DALP) which is basically involved in cell signalling, cell fate determination, transcriptional regulation of gene expression etc.
Novel insecticides, New chemistry, Novel mode of action, New group of insecticides, New insect control chemicals, Novel chemicals for insect management
Comparative sequence studies of the repeat elements in diverse insect species can provide useful information on how to make use of them for developing abundant markers that can be used in those species;
$ At the moment, a total of 8 species are in genome assembly stages and another 35 are in progress for genome sequencing;
$ Different molecular marker systems in the field of entomology are expected to provide new directions to study insect genomes in an unprecedented way in the years to come
Genome Mapping And Biological Resources Slides.pptxAqsaZakaria
Genome Mapping is the process of determining the precise sequence of DNA nucleotides that make up an organism's genome.In rapidly evolving fields of Bioinformatics genome mapping & Biological resources interwine enabling groundbreaking discoveries in biological research. It helps in understanding life intricacies, paving a way for innovative applications in different fields.It helps in understanding the structure and function of genes, identifying genetic variations, and studying the genetic basis of diseases. Techniques like DNA sequencing and genetic markers are used for genome mapping.
In summery, Genome mapping provides critical insights into genetic makeup of biological resources ,enpowering researchers and stakeholders to utlilize these resources in different fields.
Dr. Jay Calvert - Viral genetics and application to vaccine developmentJohn Blue
Viral genetics and application to vaccine development - Dr. Jay Calvert, Zoetis, Inc, from the 2017 North American PRRS/National Swine Improvement Federation Joint Meeting, December 1‐3, 2017, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2017-north-american-prrs-nsif-joint-meeting
Process whereby a marker is used for indirect selection of a genetic determinant or determinants of a trait of interest (i.e. productivity, disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and/or quality).
Trait of interest is selected not based on the trait itself but on a marker linked to it.
The assumption is that linked allele associates with the gene and/or quantitative trait locus (QTL) of interest. MAS can be useful for traits that are difficult to measure, exhibit low heritability, and/or are expressed late in development.
Pre-Requisites: Two pre-requisites for marker assisted selection are: (i) a tight linkage between molecular marker and gene of interest, and (ii) high heritability of the gene of interest.
Markers Used: The most commonly used molecular markers include amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP), restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeats (SSR) or micro satellites, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), etc. The use of molecular markers differs from species to species also.
Molecular Breeding in Plants is an introduction to the fundamental techniques...UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
This slide describe the process of molecular breeding in plants which involves the application of molecular markers for Marker Assisted Selection and Marker Assisted Breeding.
B4FA 2012 Nigeria: Cassava Research in Nigeria - Emmanual Okogbeninb4fa
Presentation by Dr Emmanuel Okogbenin, National Root Crops Research Centre, Umudike, Nigeria
Delivered at the B4FA Media Dialogue Workshop, Ibadan, Nigeria - September 2012
www.b4fa.org
70-80% of people worldwide rely chiefly on traditional, largely herbal, medicines.
The global demand for herbal medicine is not only large but growing.
Various technologies- adopted for enhancing bioactive molecules in medicinal plants.
Biotechnological tools are important for the multiplication and genetic enhancement of medicinal plants.
In vitro regeneration and genetic transformation are the Techniques adopted.
Marker Assisted Selection in Crop BreedingPawan Chauhan
Marker Assisted Selection is a value addition to conventional methods of Crop Breeding. It has been gaining importance in plant breeding with new generation of plant breeders and to get accurate and fast desired result from plant breeding.
What is Genome,Genome mapping,types of Genome mapping,linkage or genetic mapping,Physical mapping,Somatic cell hybridization
Radiation hybridization ,Fish( =fluorescence in - situ hybridization),Types of probes for FISH,applications,Molecular markers,Rflp(= Restriction fragment length polymorphism),RFLPs may have the following Applications;Advantages of rflp,disAdvantages of rflp, Rapd(=Random amplification of polymorphic DNA),Process of rapd, Difference between rflp &rapd
1. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes for Mummy Berry
(Monilinia vaccinii‐corymbosi) Resistance in Blueberry
Ashley Yow1, Kathleen Burchhardt2 , Marc Cubeta2, Hamid Ashrafi1
1North Carolina State University, Department of Horticulture
2North Carolina State University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology
BACKGROUND
• Molecular data for blueberries is severely lacking.
• Economic loss due to mummy berry has been repeatedly documented across N.
America.
• Molecular data is needed to truly understand the genetic mechanisms behind
pathogen resistance.
• Next‐generation sequencing can generate large amounts of genomic data within a
few weeks.
• RNA‐seq is a powerful tool for measuring differential gene expression.
• In this study, we used a susceptible cultivar, ‘Arlen’, for RNA‐seq analysis.
OBJECTIVES
• To develop transcriptome sequences of a blueberry cultivar (Arlen) from total RNA
extracted from leaves, roots, and different developmental stages of flowers and
fruit.
• Mapping cv. ‘Arlen’ transcriptome reads to the ‘W85‐20’ reference genome is a good
indication of up‐ and down‐regulated genes.
• To develop transcriptome sequences of a blueberry cultivar (Arlen) for mature
fruit both infected and uninfected with mummy berry.
• To make a transcriptome assembly of cv. ‘Arlen’ from Illumina short reads.
• To make a genome assembly of M. vaccinii‐corymbosi from Roche 454 reads.
• To identify candidate genes related to mummy berry resistance and genes related
to the infection process.
METHODS
• Samples were freeze dried in the field and transferred to ‐80⁰C freezer on dry ice.
• RNA was extracted from leaves, flowers, and fruits.
• cDNA libraries were created using the KAPA mRNA‐Seq kit for Illumina platforms.
• 200‐300bp desired insert size
• Libraries were run using the Illumina Miseq
• 150bp read length, single‐end
• 454 read sequences for M. vaccinii‐corymbosi were obtained from Dr. Marc
Cubeta.
• CLC Genomics v. 9.0.1 was used for trimming reads, de Novo assembly, RNA‐seq
mapping, and expression analysis.
• Arlen sequences were mapped to both the ‘W85‐20’ blueberry reference genome and an
assembled genome for an NC isolate of M. vaccinii‐corymbosi
• For de novo assembly of cv. ‘Arlen‘ we used a word size of 31, bubble size of 150, and
minimum contig length of 300bp
• For de novo assembly of M. vaccinii‐corymbosi we used a word size of 19, bubble size of
334, and minimum contig length of 200bp
• BLASTx v. 2.4.0+ was used in Linux terminal for blasting contigs to the full NCBI
non‐redundant protein database.
RESULTS
• We were able to assemble 49,803 contigs from our cv. ‘Arlen’ transcriptome reads
after filtering out reads associated with the M. vaccinii‐corymbosi fungus.
• The contig N50 for this assembly was 1,084 bp long and our largest contig was 15,731 bp
long.
• As expected, we had a higher percentage of transcriptome reads from our
infected mature fruits that mapped to the M. vaccinii‐corymbosi genome
assembly due to the presence of the pathogen in the fruit.
• 38.97% for mummy fruit rep 1 and 41.08% for mummy fruit rep 2.
• These two tissues also had the lowest percentage of reads map to the ‘W85‐20’ diploid
blueberry reference genome.
• The Principal Component Analysis showed that our mummy infected fruits were
clustered together and uninfected tissues were clustered together based on RPKM
of scaffolds in the ‘W85‐20’ blueberry genome.
• Scaffolds in the ‘W85‐20’ blueberry genome with a high fold‐difference between
our infected and non‐infected tissue groups are of interest because they may
contain genes that play a role in mummy berry infection.
• Scaffold 66203; Scaffold 35130; Scaffold 88151; Scaffold 35999
CONCLUSIONS
• Some of the cv. ‘Arlen’ transcriptome reads did not map to either the M. vaccinii‐
corymbosi genome or the ‘W85‐20’ diploid blueberry reference genome.
• The reason for this could be due to differences between cv. ‘Arlen’ and the ‘W85‐20’
accession, or it could be due to an incomplete blueberry reference genome.
• Annotation on our ‘W85‐20’ diploid blueberry reference genome will be needed in
order to identify genes related to mummy berry infection. Currently, the genome
is in the form of scaffolds, which could contain multiple genes.
• In the future, we will also include more cultivars on the extreme ends of the
spectrum of resistance.
• In particular we are interested in performing analyses on cv. ‘Blue Gold’, which is known to
be highly susceptible to mummy berry.
Arlen Transcriptome Reads Mapping Stats
CV. Arlen Location
Number of
Reads
Reads Mapped
to W85‐20
% of Reads
Mapped
Reads Mapped
to M. vaccinii‐
corymbosi
% of Reads
Mapped
Fruit Stage 1 Castle Hayne 1,257,005 767,816 61.08 7,283 0.58
Fruit Stage 2 Castle Hayne 1,271,969 789,008 62.03 3,084 0.24
Fruit Stage 3 Castle Hayne 1,487,476 855,195 57.49 6,573 0.44
Fruit Stage 4 Castle Hayne 1,206,255 731,511 60.64 3,164 0.26
Fruit Stage 4
Rep 2
Castle Hayne 987,653 584,972 59.23 2,492 0.25
Mummy Fruit
Stage 4
Castle Hayne 1,150,852 169,709 14.75 448,469 38.97
Mummy Fruit
Stage 4 Rep 2
Castle Hayne 982,291 156,014 15.88 403,572 41.08
Fruit Stage 3 Sandhills 1,121,100 617,924 55.12 7,897 0.70
Fruit Stage 3
Rep 2
Sandhills 1,139,034 681,415 59.82 4,895 0.43
Fruit Stage 4 Sandhills 1,104,765 680,120 61.56 3,267 0.30
Fruit Stage 4
Rep 2
Sandhills 1,031,052 636,119 61.70 3,371 0.33
FL1 Castle Hayne 820,782 505,015 61.53 6,170 0.75
FL3 Castle Hayne 1,021,020 583,335 57.13 8,058 0.79
FL5 Castle Hayne 1,031,618 567,937 55.05 10,578 1.03
L Castle Hayne 893,901 502,060 56.17 5,898 0.66
R Castle Hayne 1,193,456 718,407 60.20 6,357 0.53
All Tissues ‐‐ 17,700,229 9,546,557 53.93 931,128 5.26
Table 2: Statistics for cv. ‘Arlen’ transcriptome reads mapping to the diploid blueberry ‘W85‐20’ reference genome as well as
M. vaccinii‐corymbosi genome assembly
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was partially supported by Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium Award No. 2016 R‐04 and North Carolina
State University.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Kathleen Burchhardt to collect and sequence one isolates of M. vaccinium corymbosi.
The authors would like to acknowledge NCSU’s Genomic Sciences Lab for performing the sequencing using Illumina MiSeq.
The authors would like to thank Mr. Terry Bland for his help with tissue collection.
REFERENCES
CLC Genomics Workbench 9.0.1 (https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/)
American Phytopathological Society & Oregon State Univeristy
(http://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/fungi/ascomycetes/Pages/MummyBerry.aspx)
University of Georgia Plant Pathology , University of Georgia, Bugwood.org
Assembly Stats
Arlen
Transcriptome
Assembly Contig
Measurements
M. vaccinii‐
corymbosi
Assembly Contig
Measurements
N50 1,084 bp 838 bp
Minimum 300 bp 200 bp
Maximum 15,731 bp 14,120 bp
Average 870 bp 754 bp
Count 49,803 contigs 18,988 contigs
Total 43,309,250 bp 14,320,408 bp
Table 1: Cv. ‘Arlen’ Transcriptome Assembly and M.
vaccinii‐corymbosi Genome Assembly Summary
Statistics
Figure 1: Tissues collected for RNA extraction
Figure 2: Workflow for performing RNA‐Seq analysis
Figure 3: Visualization of mummy berry infection in
blueberry fruits
EDGE test for cv. ‘Arlen’
transcriptome reads mapped
to blueberry genome
Principal Component Analysis
for cv. ‘Arlen’ transcriptome
reads mapped to blueberry
genome
Figure 4: Hierarchical
Clustering of Samples for cv.
‘Arlen’ transcriptome reads
mapped to ‘W85‐20’ blueberry
reference genome