SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement Through
Transgenesis
Introduction
Genetic engineering is the direct manipulation of an organism's genes using biotechnology. It is
a set of technologies used to change the genetic makeup of cells, including the transfer of genes
within and across species boundaries to produce improved or novel organisms. New DNA is
obtained by either isolating and copying the genetic material of interest using recombinant DNA
methods or by artificially synthesising the DNA. In the current scenario, the most critical
challenge faced by the human race is to provide food security for a growing population. By 2050,
the human population will reach 10 billion and to feed the world, global food production needs
to increase by 60–100%. Besides the growing population rate, extreme weather, reduced
agricultural land availability, increasing biotic and abiotic stresses are significant constraints for
farming and food production. Development of technologies that can contribute to crop
improvement can increase production to some extent. Genetic manipulation techniques using
physical, chemical and biological (T-DNA insertion/transposons) mutagenesis have contributed
majorly in studying the role of genes and identifying the biological mechanisms for the
improvement of crop species in the past few decades. For the past three decades, transgenic
techniques have been used to understand basic plant biology and also used for crop
improvement. However, the integration of transgenes into the host genome is non-specific,
sometimes unstable and is a matter of public concern when it comes to edible crop species. A
construct is usually created and used to insert this DNA into the host organism. The first
recombinant DNA molecule was made by Paul Berg in 1972 by combining DNA from the
monkey virus SV40 with the lambda virus. As well as inserting genes, the process can be used to
remove, or "knock out", genes. The new DNA can be inserted randomly, or targeted to a specific
part of the genome.Genetic modification for crop improvement. Genetic modification (GM) of
crops involves the transfer of genes for specific traits between distantly related plant species
using recombinant DNA technology known as transgenesis. Although there is a scientific
consensus that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human
health than conventional food, GM food safety is a leading concern with critics. Gene flow,
impact on non-target organisms, control of the food supply and intellectual property rights have
also been raised as potential issues. Even before the creation of transgenics, the alteration of
crops to improve their production was performed through selection. In fact, this selection has
been going on for thousands of years and only in the past few centuries has it become a dedicated
science onto itself. So, why has there been a push to switch from selection to the use of genetic
techniques (transgenics) to improve crops over the recent decades? Simply put, to manipulate
plants through selection takes many generations (i.e. large investments of time) and does not
always work. Through the use of transgenics, one can produce plants with desired traits and even
2
increase yields to allow for more crops that last longer and withstand pests and disease. The
Flavr Savr was engineered to have a longer shelf life, but most current GM crops are modified to
increase resistance to insects and herbicides.
What is a Transgenic Crop?
A transgenic crop is a genetically modified organism (GMO). Transgenic indicates that a transfer
of genes has occurred using recombinant DNA technology [1]. Generally a transgenic crop
contains one or more genes that have been inserted artificially either from an unrelated plant or
from different species altogether.
Why do we use Transgenic Crops?
Plants have been modified for many reasons over the years but the most common purpose is to
produce the best products possible. Before recombinant DNA technology, it was possible to
produce some improved products, although it was very difficult to do and many things could not
be improved or changed. An improved product may involve changing the color or the size of a
plant, making it more appealing to the buyer’s eye. Or it may be more practical, allowing
increased tolerance to cold, frost, or drought; all making a crop easier to grow in a constantly
changing environment. Goals like these are unattainable with traditional selection programs and
thus transgenics is now preferred when trying to come up with new products to improve sales.
One of the hottest areas right now is the modification of crops to increase the resistance of plants
to insects and diseases they may carry. Improving resistance to these diseases and insects also
reduces the need for herbicides and pesticides. This makes the plants safer for the consumer and
allows the farmer to save money on chemicals. In conclusion, transgenic crops are an
economically safer method of producing crop products, which makes them appealing and
potentially profitable.
Climate Change and Its Impact on Plant Genetic Resources
The most profound and direct impacts of climate change over previous decade and the next few
decades will surely be on agriculture and food security. The effects of climate change will also
depend on current production conditions. The area where already being obstructed by other
stresses, such as pollution and will likely to have more adverse impact by changing climate.
Food production systems rely on highly selected cultivars under better endowed environments
but it might be increasingly vulnerable to climate change impacts such as pest and disease
spread. If food production levels decreases over the year, there will be huge pressure to cultivate
the crops under marginal lands or implement unsustainable practices that, over the long-term,
degrade lands and resources and adversely impact biodiversity on and near agricultural areas. In
fact, such situations have already been experienced by most of the developing countries. These
changes have been seen to cause a decrease in the variability of those genetic loci (alleles of a
gene) controlling physical and phenotypic responses to changing climate. Therefore, genetic
variation holds the key to the ability of populations and species to persist over evolutionary
3
period of time through changing environments . If this persists, neither any organism can predict
its future (and evolutionary theory does not require them to) nor can any of those organisms be
optimally adapted for all environmental conditions. Nonetheless, the current genetic composition
of a crop species influences how well its members will adapt to future physical and biotic
environments.The population can also migrate across the landscape over generations. By
contrast, populations that have a narrow range of genotypes and are more phenotypically uniform
may merely fail to survive and reproduce at all as the conditions become less locally favorable.
Such populations are more likely to become extirpated (locally extinct), and in extreme cases the
entire plant species may end up at risk of extinction. For example, the Florida Yew (Torreya
taxifolia) is currently one of the rarest conifer species in North America. But in the early
Holocene (10,000 years ago), when conditions in southeastern North America were cooler and
wetter than today, the species was probably widespread. The reasons for that are not completely
understood, but T. taxifolia failed to migrate towards the northward as climate changed during
the Holocene. Today, it is restricted to a few locations in the Apalachicola River Basin in
southern Georgia and the Florida panhandle. As the T. taxifolia story illustrates, once plant
species are pushed into marginal habitat at the limitations of their physiological tolerance, they
may enter an extinction vortex, a downward cycle of small populations, and so on. Reduced
genetic variability is a key step in the extinction vortex. Gene banks must be better to respond to
novel and increased demands on germplasm for adapting agriculture to climate change. Gene
banks need to include different characteristics in their screening processes and their collections
need to be comprehensive, including what are now considered minor crops, and that may come
with huge impact on food baskets.
Genetic Engineering for crop improvement
Genetic engineering becomes a powerful technique that applicable for altering the genetic make
up of the crop plants. It is achieved through transgenic or recombinant DNA technology. The
crop plants having so many desired characters but due the presence of one or few unfavourable
characters makes the crop to limit in its area and production. This makes the farmers to
forcefully have to shift to other crops. And also to overcome the malnutritional problems facing a
huge mass of the people of the world, transgenic technology helps in mitigating this problem in
an effective manner. Recombinant technology is also helpful in solving the problems arising due
to biotic and abiotic stresses. To over come all these problems, transgenic technology helps to
transfer desired characters from various sources to required crop plants by identification and
isolating the gene of our interest. The technology of genetic modification trough transgenic
approach is more directed and the inserted genes can be easily followed. In contrast to green
revolution that only emphasis on three main crops (rice, wheat and maize) and produced
ambivalent results, the gene revolution represents a technical and ethical advance and can be use
to improve the characteristics of all targeted plants with significantly enhanced social impacts.
However, genetic engineering is not set to replace conventional plant breeding but is a modern
tool for use of plant breeders to fasten the breeding programme.
4
The varieties of maize, tobacco, cotton etc., that are resistance to herbicide were developed by
transformation of plants with glyphosate resistant gene through Agrobacterium mediated
transformation. Transgenic technology yielded genetically modified (GM) crops having novel
genes with favourable characteristics like higher yields, herbicide resistant, insect and disease
resistant, drought resistant, salinity resistant, etc.
Depending upon their preference, there are three methods for transformation of the novel genes
are as follows:
 Biological method
 Mechanical method
 Chemical method
1. Biological method:
This method involves the use of biological systems for transformation of the desired gene or
genes.
 Agrobacterium mediated transformation: Agrobacterium remains on the preferred
mechanism to introduce exogenous genes into plant cells. One of the reasons for this is
the wide spectrum of plants that are susceptible to transformation by this bacterium.
 A modified T-DNA region of the Ti (Tumor inducing) plasmid in which the genes
responsible for tumor formation are removed and inserted the foreign novel gene by
genetic engineering.
 Viruses: Phages (Viruses that infect bacteria) and Tobacco Mosaic virus can be used as
vectors for transformation of genes into plant cells. The technique is still being
developed.
2. Mechanical method:
It includes the use of equipments for transformation of gene is as follows;
•Electrophoration: Is a process whereby electric pulses of high field strength are used to
reversibly permiabilise cell membranes to facilitate uptake of
DNA. Electrophoration has been successfully used for transforming plants in which efficient
regeneration of plants from protoplast is possible.
•Microinjection: In this case needles used for injecting DNA are with a diameter greater than
cell diameter. DNA (0.3 ml) solution is injected with conventional syringe into region of plant
which will develop into floral tillers fourteen days before meiosis.
5
•Biolistic or Microprojectile for DNA transfer: This method involves bombardment of particles
carrying DNA or RNA of interest into target cells using high velocity transfer mechanism. This
method can be used for any plant cells, leaves, root sections, embryo seeds and pollens.
3. Chemical method: This method using polyethylene glycol and calcium phosphate for gene
transfer.
How are Transgenic Crops Made?
For many years plant breeding entailed the selection of the finest plants to get the best crops. In
those days, variation occurred through induced mutation or hybridization where two or more
plants were crossed. Selection occurred through nature, using a “selection of the fittest” concept,
where only the seeds best adapted to that environment succeeded. For example, farmers selected
only the biggest seeds with non-shattering seed heads, assuming these to be the best. Today,
scientists can not only select, but also create crops by inserting genes to make a seeds bare any
trait desired.
In order to make a transgenic crop, there are five main steps: extracting DNA, cloning a gene of
interest, designing the gene for plant infiltration, transformation, and finally plant breeding.
Figure: Overview of how transgenic crops are created.
To understand this process, one must first known a bit about DNA (deoxyribonucleic acids).
DNA is the universal programming language of all cells and stores their genetic information. It
contains thousands of genes, which are discrete segments of DNA that encode the information
necessary to produce and assemble specific proteins. All genes require specific regions in order
to be utilized (or expressed) by a cell. These regions include (see Figure 2):
1. A promoter region, which signals where a gene begins and it used to express the gene;
6
2. A termination sequence, which signals the end of a gene;
3. And the coding region, which contains the actual gene to be expressed.
All these regions together allow a gene to create a protein. Once a gene is transcribed into a
protein, it can then function as an enzyme to catalyze biochemical reactions or as a structural unit
of a cell, both of which will contribute to the appearance of a particular trait in that organism.
Figure: Gene Regions.
All species are capable of turning DNA into protein through a process known as translation. This
capability makes it possible to artificially put genes from one organism into another-a process
generally termed transgenics. But just isolating random DNA and inserting it into another
organism is not practical. We must first know what particular segments of DNA, and in
particular what genes, to insert. Unfortunately, with reference to producing new crops, not much
is known about which genes are responsible for increased plant yield, tolerance to different
stresses and insects, color, or various other plant characteristics. Much of the research in
transgenics is now focused on how to identify and sequence genes contributing to these
characteristics.
Genes that are determined to contribute to certain traits then need to be obtained in a significant
amount before they can be inserted into another organism. In order to obtain the DNA
comprising a gene, DNA is first extracted from cells and put into a bacterial plasmid. A plasmid
is a molecular biological tool that allows any segment of DNA in be put into a carrier cell
(usually a bacterial cell) and replicated to produce more of it. A bacterial cell (i.e. E. coli) that
contains a plasmid can put aside and used over and over again to produce copies of the gene the
researcher is interested in, a process that is generally referred to as “cloning” the gene. The word
“cloning” referring to how many identical copies of the original gene can now be produced at
will. Plasmids containing this gene can be used to modify the gene in any way the researcher
sees fit, allowing novel effects on the gene trait to be produced .
Once the gene of interest has been amplified, it is time to introduce it into the plant species we
are interested in. The nucleus of the plant cell is the target for the new transgenic DNA. There
are many methods of doing this but the two most common methods include the “Gene Gun” and
Agrobacterium method.
The “Gene Gun” method, also known as the micro-projectile bombardment method, is most
commonly used in species such as corn and rice. As its name implies, this procedure involves
7
high velocity micro-projectiles to deliver DNA into living cells using a gun. It involves sticking
DNA to small micro-projectiles and then firing these into a cell. This technique is clean and safe.
It enables scientists to transform organized tissue of plant species and has a universal delivery
system common to many tissue types from many different species1. It can give rise to un-wanted
side effects, such as the gene of interest being rearranged upon entry or the target cell sustaining
damage upon bombardment. Nevertheless, it has been quite useful for getting transgenes into
organisms when no other options are available.
The Agrobacterium method involves the use of a soil-dwelling bacteria known as Agrobacterium
tumefaciens, which has the ability to infect plant cells with a piece of its DNA. The piece of
DNA that infects a plant is integrated into a plants chromosome through a tumor-inducing
plasmid (Ti plasmid), which can take control of the plant’s cellular machinery and use it to make
many copies of its own bacterial DNA. The Ti plasmid is a large circular DNA particle that
replicates independently of the bacterial chromosome .
Figure : Transfer DNA on a plasmid in Agrobacterium
The importance of this plasmid is that it contains regions of transfer DNA (tDNA), where a
researcher can insert a gene, which can be transferred to a plant cell through a process known as
a floral dip. A floral dip involves dipping flowering plants into a solution of Agrobacterium
carrying the gene of interest, followed by the transgenic seeds being collected directly from the
plant. This process is useful in that it is a natural method of transfer and therefore thought of as a
more acceptable technique. In addition, Agrobacterium is capable of transferring large fragments
of DNA very efficiently without substantial rearrangements, followed by maintaining high
stability of the gene that was transferred . One of the biggest limitations of Agrobacterium is that
not all important food crops can be infected by this bacteria.
Significance of Genetic Conservation of Crop Plants
The growing population pressure and urbanization of agricultural lands and rapid modernization
in every field of our day-to-day activities that create biodiversity are getting too eroded in direct
and indirect way. For instance, land degradation, deforestation, urbanization, coastal
development, and environmental stress are collectively leading to large-scale extinction of plant
species especially agriculturally important food crops. On the other hand, system driven famine
such as, Irish potato famine and Southern corn leaf blight epidemic in USA are the two instances
of food crises caused by large-scale cultivation of genetically homogenous varieties of potato
and corn, respectively. Even after these historical events, the importance of PGR had only got
8
popular recognition when the spread of green revolution across cultivated crops threatened the
conservation of land races. Green revolution technologies introduced improved crop varieties
that have higher yields, and it was hoped that they would increase farmers’ income.
Consequently, the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Researches (CIGAR)
initiated gene banks and research centers of domestication for conserving PGR in most of the
stable food crops around the world. Center for domestication: maize (Mexico), wheat and barley
(middle/near East and North Africa), rice (North China), and potatoes (Peru); for further
information see http://www.cigar.org/center/index.html.) The Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) supported the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (ITPGR) and UN
supported the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) which are the international agreements
that recognize the important role of genetic diversity conservation. Such treaty still plays in
current and future food production as one of the major supremo.
Genetic diversity is the key pillar of biodiversity and diversity within species, between species,
and of ecosystems, which was defined at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit. However, the
problem is that modern crop varieties, especially, have been developed primarily for high
yielding potential under well endowed production conditions. Such varieties are often not
suitable for low income farmers in marginal production environments as they are facing highly
variable stress conditions. Land races or traditional varieties have been found to have higher
stability (adaptation over time) in low-input agriculture under marginal environments, thus, their
cultivation may contribute farm level resilience in face of food production shocks. This is
especially true in some part of Ethiopia where agroclimatic conditions are challenging,
technological progress is slow, and market institutions are poorly developed and have no
appropriate infrastructure. The goal of conservation genetics is to maintain genetic diversity at
many levels and to provide tools for population monitoring and assessment that can be used for
conservation planning. Every individual is genetically unique by nature. Conservation efforts and
related research are rarely directed towards individuals but genetic variation is always measured
in individuals and this can only be estimated for collections of individuals in a
population/species. It is possible to identify the genetic variation from phenotypic variation
either by quantitative traits (traits that vary continuous and are governed by many genes, e.g.,
plant height) or discrete traits traits that fall into discrete categories and are governed by one or
few major genes (e.g., white, pink, or red petal color in certain flowers) which are referred to as
qualitative traits. Genetic variation can also be identified by examining variation at the level of
enzymes using the process of protein electrophoresis. Further, genetic variations can also be
examined by the order of nucleotides in the DNA sequence.
Applications of Genetic Engineering in crop improvement
Transgenic breeding enables the transfer of genes across taxonomic boundaries unlike
conventional breeding where it is possible to transfer genes from closely related species only. It
9
also offers new avenues of plant improvement in shorter period compared to conventional
breeding and new possibility of incorporating new genes without problems incompatibility.
1. Herbicide resistant: herbicides normally affect processes like photosynthesis or
biosynthesis of essential amino acids. Transformation of cereal cropswith Glyphosate
resistant gene (Glyphosate = herbicide). Herbicide tolerant (HT) soybean and canola are
released for commercial cultivation.
2. Insect resistant: the genes which responsible for the production of delta-endotoxine in
Bacillus thuringiensis is used as biological insecticide. Thetransgene Cry 1AC has been
transferred to many crops for example looper resistance in soybean, pod borer resistance in
groundnut, head borer resistance in sunflower, semi-looper resistance in castor etc. snowdrop
lectin gene from snow drop (Galanthus nivalis) was transferred to brassica and safflower for
aphid resistant.
3. Resistance against viral infection: coat protein gene from Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV)
was transferred to develop resistant varieties of crop plants.The resistant varieties developed
in crop plants like soybean for resistant to yellow mosaic virus, groundnut for resistant to
bud and stem necrosis, clump and stripe virus resistance, whereas in sunflower, resistance
developed for bud necrosis.
4. Resistance against bacterial and fungal pathogens: Chitinase genes was transferred to
crops like Brassica, Soybean, Sunflower, Sesame etc foralternaria leaf spot disease, where
Figure: Applications of Genetic Engineering in crop
improvement
10
as in case of groundnut which was introduced against leaf spot and alternaria blight and in
castor for Botrytis resistance. Acetyl transferase gene was transferred for wildfire disease of
tobacco caused by pseudomonas syringae.
5. Improvement of the nutritional qualities in crop plants: The carotene gene has been
transferred from daphoddils to rice grains (Golden Rice) forincreasing Beta-carotene
content in grains and for solving the blindness in childerns. Antisense Fae 1 gene transferred
to Brassica napus and Brassica juncea for low erucic acid content and also for low linolenic
acid content in case of linseed. Antisense ricin gene transferred to castor for reduction of
ricin content and RCA endosperm in castor seeds. Antisense sterol desaturase/ + ac1
inserted into sunflower for developing high oleic acid containing types.
6. Improvement of crop plants against abiotic stresses: transcription factor genes, structural
genes, regulatory genes were introduced into the groundnut,soybean, Brassica juncea, B. napus
to develop drought and salinity tolerant types.
7. Development of transgenic male sterile lines: transgenic male sterile lines of safflower
Brassica juncea were developed through the transfer of
Barnase gene from Bacteria (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens).
8. A long term goal in agriculture is to introduce the genes (Nif genes) for nitrogen fixation in
crop plants.
There is a need to establish reliable protocols for genetic engineering of crop plants so that these
crops also could be brought under the umbrella of crops amenable for genetic engineering. This
technology also increased our capacity to reduce disease susceptible varieties and enhance the
efficiency of production. The greatest challenge in agriculture is to improve food grain
production and eradication of malnutritional problem in the developing countries and hopefully
this technique will be applied to the regions where food shortage is greatest. By knowing the
present problems of farmers and also health point of view, developing safe and efficient
transgenic plants is needed. For achieving these, there is need of intensifying research at national
and international levels to ensure that biotechnology leads to second revolution in agriculture,
which both productive and sustainable. Synergy between GM breeding and traditional plant
breeding needs to be further strengthened.
Presentstatus of transgenic crops
The first transgenic plant product marketed commercially was the well‐ known ‘Flavr Savr’
tomato which had been modified to contain reduced levels of the cell wall softening enzyme
polygalacturonase. Tomato purée with a similar type of modification has been on the market in
the UK since February 1996. Since that time, however, there has been a massive expansion in the
11
growth of transgenic field crops, particularly maize, soybean, oilseed rape, and cotton, such that
in North America transgenic varieties now represent the majority of the acreage of these crops.
For example, it is now estimated that 70% of the Canadian oilseed rape crop in 1999 will be
genetically modified. Most of the varieties grown to date have been modified with genes for
herbicide or insect resistance, both of which provide a significant economic benefit for the
farmer. Material from these modified crops, particularly soybean and maize, is now imported
into the European Union in large quantities. However, in several European countries there is now
considerable consumer resistance to food products containing such GM constituents, either in the
native form or as processed derivatives (e.g. soya lecithin).
In the UK this resistance seems to be based primarily on a mistrust of the government regulatory
process, allied to a strong desire for choice (to date the commodity GM products have not been
segregated from their non‐ GM equivalent). These concerns have led to many retailers removing
GM soya and maize products from sale, though enzymes and vitamins from GM microbes
remain as common components of many foods and drinks. Pending the outcome of ‘farm scale’
trials designed to monitor the environmental impact of GM crops, there has been an associated
delay in the granting of permits for the growth of such crops for sale.
Figure : Present status of transgenic crops
12
Advantages of Transgenic Plant:
1.Food supplies become predictable.
When crop yields become predictable, then the food supply becomes predictable at the same
time. This gives us the ability to reduce the presence of food deserts around the world, providing
a greater population with a well-rounded nutritional opportunity that may not have existed in the
past.
2. Nutritional content can be improved.
Genetic modifications do more than add pest resistance or weather resistance to GMO crops. The
nutritional content of the crops can be altered as well, providing a denser nutritional profile than
what previous generations were able to enjoy. This means people in the future could gain the
same nutrition from lower levels of food consumption. The UN Food and Agricultural
Organization notes that rice, genetically modified to produce high levels of Vitamin A, have
helped to reduce global vitamin deficiencies.
3. Genetically modified foods can have a longer shelf life.
Instead of relying on preservatives to maintain food freshness while it sits on a shelf, genetically
modified foods make it possible to extend food life by enhancing the natural qualities of the food
itself. According to Environmental Nutrition, certain preservatives are associated with a higher
carcinogen, heart disease, and allergy risk.
4. We receive medical benefits from GMO crops.
Through a process called “pharming,” it is possible to produce certain proteins and vaccines,
along with other pharmaceutical goods, thanks to the use of genetic modifications. This practice
offers cheaper methods of improving personal health and could change how certain medications
are provided to patients in the future. Imagine being able to eat your dinner to get a tetanus
booster instead of receiving a shot in the arm – that’s the future of this technology.
5. It creates foods that are more appealing to eat.
Colors can be changed or improved with genetically modified foods so they become more
13
pleasing to eat. Spoon University reports that deeper colors in foods changes how the brain
perceives what is being eaten. Deeper red colors make food seem to be sweeter, even if it is not.
Brighter foods are associated with better nutrition and improved flavors.
6. Genetically modified foods are easierto transport.
Because GMO crops have a prolonged shelf life, it is easier to transport them greater distances.
This improvement makes it possible to take excess food products from one community and
deliver it to another that may be experiencing a food shortage. GMO foods give us the
opportunity to limit food waste, especially in the developing world, so that hunger can be
reduced and potentially eliminated.
7. Herbicides and pesticides are used less often.
Herbicides and pesticides create certain hazards on croplands that can eventually make the soil
unusable. Farmers growing genetically modified foods do not need to use these products as often
as farmers using traditional growing methods, allowing the soil to recover its nutrient base over
time. Because of the genetic resistance being in the plant itself, the farmer still achieves a
predictable yield at the same time.
DisadvantagesofTransgenic Plant
1.GMO crops may cause antibiotic resistance.
Iowa State University research shows that when crops are modified to include antibiotics and
other items that kill germs and pests, it reduces the effectiveness of an antibiotic or other
medication when it is needed in the traditional sense. Because the foods contain trace amounts of
the antibiotic when consumed, any organisms that would be affected by a prescription antibiotic
have built an immunity to it, which can cause an illness to be more difficult to cure.
2. Farmers growing genetically modified foods have a greater legal liability.
Crops that are genetically modified will create seeds that are genetically modified. Cross-
pollination is possible between GMO crops and non-GMO crops as well, even when specified
farming practices are followed. Because many of the crops and seeds that produce GMO crops
are patented, farmers that aren’t even involved in growing these foods are subjected to a higher
14
level of legal liability. Farmers that do grow GMO crops could also face liabilities for letting
seeds go to other fields or allowing cross-pollination to occur.
3. Genes go into different plant species.
Crops share fields with other plants, including weeds. Genetic migrations are known to occur.
What happens when the genes from an herbicide-resistant crop get into the weeds it is designed
to kill? Interactions at the cellular level could create unforeseen complications to future crop
growth where even the benefits of genetically modified foods may not outweigh the problems
that they cause. One example: dozens of weed species are already resistant to atrazine.
4. Independent research is not allowed.
6 companies control most of the genetically modified foods market at the core level. Because
most GMO foods are made from corn, wheat, or soybeans, even food manufacturers that use
these crops are at the mercy of the manufacturer’s preferences. Over 50% of the seed producers
that have created the GMO foods market prohibit any independent research on the final crops as
an effort to protect their profits.
5. Some genetically modified foods may present a carcinogen exposure risk.
A paper that has been twice-published, but retracted once as well, showed that crops tolerant to
commercial pesticides greatly increased the risk of cancer development in rats. The information
from this research study, though limited, has been widely circulated and creates the impression
that all GMO foods are potentially hazardous.
The advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified foods can spark a bitter debate. There
is an advantage in providing the world with better food access, but more food should not come at
the expense of personal health. GMO foods must be labeled in Europe and petitions in the US are
seeking the same thing. We deserve to know what we’re eating and how that food is grown.
Knowing more about genetically modified foods allows us to do just that.
The future of CRISPR technologiesin agriculture
Conventional plant breeding is unlikely to meet increasing food demands and other
environmental challenges. By contrast, CRISPR technology is erasing barriers to genome editing
and could revolutionize plant breeding. However, to fully benefit from the CRISPR revolution,
we should focus on resolving its technical and regulatory uncertainties.Genetic diversity is a key
source for trait improvement in plants. Creating variations in the gene pool is the foremost
15
requirement for developing novel plant varieties. Once the desired alterations are achieved,
transgenes can be crossed out from the improved variety. Crop improvement has been done for
years via traditional plant breeding techniques or through various physical, chemical (e.g.,
gamma radiation, ethyl methanesulfonate) and biological methods (e.g., T-DNA, transposon
insertion) leading to point mutations, deletions, rearrangements, and gene duplications. The
advent of site-specific nucleases (SSNs) highlighted the importance of site directed mutagenesis
over random mutagenesis (Osakabe et al., 2010; Sikora et al., 2011). Random mutagenesis has
also its own list of shortcomings too. It produces multiple undesirable rearrangements and
mutations, which are expensive and very complex to screen. Gene editing uses engineered SSNs
to delete, insert or replace a DNA sequence. Development of the engineered
endonucleases/mega-nucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector
nucleases (TALENs) and type II clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat
(CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) paved the way for single nucleotide excision
mechanism for crop improvement. These genome-editing technologies use programmable
nucleases to increase the specificity of the target locus. Genome editing modifies a specific
genome in precise and predictable manner. There could be varieties of genes, which could be
altered in different cell types and organisms with the aid of nucleases that offer targeted
alterations. ZFNs is one of the oldest gene editing technologies, developed in the 1990s and
owned by Sangamo BioSciences. ZFNs are premeditated restriction enzymes having sequence
specific DNA binding zinc finger motifs and non-specific cleavage domain of Fok1
endonuclease. The emergence of CRISPR technology supersedes ZFNs and TALENs and used
widely as a novel approach from “methods of the year” in 2011 to “breakthrough of the year” in
2015 for their captivated genome editing. This prokaryotic system is promptly accepted for
genome editing in eukaryotic host cells. CRISPR has an added advantage of gene knockout over
RNAi, which is a well-known technique for gene knockdown. CRISPR targets the endogenous
genes that are impossible to specifically target using RNAi technology with more precision and
simplicity. The CRISPR edited tomatoes will be expected to have enhanced flavor, sugar content
and aroma as compared to modern commercial varieties; corn is made resistant to drought with
high yield per hectare; wheat is edited against powdery mildew disease, and mushrooms are
targeted to reduce the melanin content. These genome-editing technologies use programmable
nucleases to increase the specificity of the target locus. Genome editing modifies a specific
genome in precise and predictable manner.
16
Different plasmids with specific Cas9 activity:
Crop Plasmid Gene/insert
name
Promoter Selectable
Marker
Cas
9
type
Significance Reference
sgRNA
expressio
n
Cas9
expression
Oryza sativa pRGEB3
2
PTG1/Cas9 U3
snoRNA
Rice
ubiquitin
Hygromycin Cut Enhanced
multiplex
editing
capability via
endogenous
tRNA
processing
system
Xie et al.,
2015
Zea mays pHSE401 gRNA
scaffold
AtU6-26 35S Hygromycin Cut Improved
designingof
CRISPR/Cas9
binary vector.
Easy method
for one or
more gRNA
assembly in
expression
cassette, high
efficiency
mutant
generation
Xinget al.,
2014
Arabidopsis
thaliana
pKI 1.1R Human codon
optimized
spCas9
U6-26p CaMV35S
, WOX2,
RPS5A
Hygromycin Cut pKIR vector
harboring
RPS5A
maintains
high
constitutive
expression
andheritable
muatations at
all
developmenta
l stages
Tsutsui and
Higashiyama
, 2017
Arabidopsis,
Nicotiana
benthamiana
, Oryza
sativa
pYPQ159 hSpCas9D10
A (human
codon
optimized)
AtU6-26 2× 35S Spectinomyci
n
Nick This toolbox
provides
reagents to
efficiently
assemble
DNA
constructs for
monocots and
dicots using
Golden Gate
Lowder et
al., 2015
17
Should We Use Transgenic Crops?
In the end, the perceived advantages and disadvantages of transgenic crops must be married to
each other to provide a crop that is environmentally sound and non-hazardous. Producers of
transgenic crops and the agencies that study their effects are aware of this point. However, to
date, there has been little evidence to support either case. More research is required in this field
to determine the true safety of these plants and to decide whether they are safe for both the
environment and for those who consume these products over the ages. At the least, most would
agree that the potential advantage of producing crops that provide the human population with
more and cheaper food makes transgenic technology a useful invention.
Conclusion
The primary advantage of genetically modified foods is that crop yields become more consistent
and productive, allowing more people to be fed. According to Oxfam, the world currently
produced about 20% more food calories than what is required for every human being to be
healthy. GMOs are not without disadvantages. Although there are no conclusive links, Brown
University concluded that changes to foods on a genetic level combine proteins that humans are
not used to consuming. This may increase the chances of an allergic reaction occurring. Since
1999, the rates of food allergies in children has increased from 3.4% to 5.1%.
References
1. Stephens J., Barakate A. (2017). “Gene editing technologies – ZFNs, TALENs, and
CRISPR/Cas9,” in Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences 2 Edn eds Thomas B., Murray B.
G., Murphyp D. J., editors. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; ) 157–161. 10.1016/B978-0-12-
394807-6.00242-2
2. Ma X, Zhu Q, Chen Y, Liu YG,Mol Plant. 2016 Jul 6; 9(7):961-74.
3.Chawla HS. 2000. Introduction to Plant Biotechnology. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers
Inc.
4. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn DD, Rees M. 2001. Transgenic crops in natural
habitats. Nature 409: 682-3.
5. Ferber D. 1999. Risks and benefits: GM crops in the cross hairs. Science 286: 1662-6.
18
6. Gasser CS, Fraley RT. 1989. Genetically engineered plants for crop improvement. Science
244(4910): 1293-9.
7. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. 1999. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature
399(6733): 214.
Additional Reading and Texts Consulted
1. Colorado State University. 2002. Transgenic Crops: An introduction and resource guide.
2. Animation of the process of cloning genes
3. Animation of how a gene gun works
4. Buchanan B. 2001. Genetic engineering and the allergy issue. Plant Physiology 126:5-7.
Web link :
 faostat3.fao.org
 vittana.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Gene transformation methods
Gene transformation methodsGene transformation methods
Somatic embryogenesis
Somatic embryogenesisSomatic embryogenesis
Somatic embryogenesis
Kanimoli Mathivathana
 
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plantsGenetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Nisha Nepoleon
 
Somaclonal variation
Somaclonal variationSomaclonal variation
Somaclonal variation
Rakesh Kumar
 
Barnase and bartar system
Barnase and bartar systemBarnase and bartar system
Barnase and bartar system
Alicia Tiny
 
somatic hybridization
somatic hybridizationsomatic hybridization
somatic hybridization
Sreeraj Thamban
 
Gene pyramiding
Gene pyramidingGene pyramiding
Gene pyramiding
Dhanya AJ
 
role of biotechnology in agriculture
role of biotechnology in agriculturerole of biotechnology in agriculture
role of biotechnology in agriculture
Ruchi Priya
 
Molecular farming
Molecular farmingMolecular farming
Molecular farming
Nirmal Kumar
 
Genetic improvement of microbial strains
Genetic improvement of microbial strainsGenetic improvement of microbial strains
Genetic improvement of microbial strains
Abhinava J V
 
Chloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationChloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformation
Sachin Ekatpure
 
Plant transformation methods
Plant transformation methodsPlant transformation methods
Plant transformation methods
Mohammed Sami
 
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
Sachin Ekatpure
 
Molecular tagging
Molecular tagging Molecular tagging
Molecular tagging
Dr. Kirti Mehta
 
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transferAgrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Nishanth S
 
Molecular pharming
Molecular pharmingMolecular pharming
Molecular pharming
Upasana Mohapatra
 
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvement
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvementBiotechnological approaches for crop improvement
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvement
Shafqat Farooq
 
Artificial seed
Artificial seedArtificial seed
Role of insect resistance in plants
Role of insect resistance in plantsRole of insect resistance in plants
Role of insect resistance in plants
Rachana Bagudam
 

What's hot (20)

Gene transformation methods
Gene transformation methodsGene transformation methods
Gene transformation methods
 
Anther culture
Anther cultureAnther culture
Anther culture
 
Somatic embryogenesis
Somatic embryogenesisSomatic embryogenesis
Somatic embryogenesis
 
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plantsGenetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
Genetic engineering and development of transgenic plants
 
Somaclonal variation
Somaclonal variationSomaclonal variation
Somaclonal variation
 
Barnase and bartar system
Barnase and bartar systemBarnase and bartar system
Barnase and bartar system
 
somatic hybridization
somatic hybridizationsomatic hybridization
somatic hybridization
 
Gene pyramiding
Gene pyramidingGene pyramiding
Gene pyramiding
 
role of biotechnology in agriculture
role of biotechnology in agriculturerole of biotechnology in agriculture
role of biotechnology in agriculture
 
Molecular farming
Molecular farmingMolecular farming
Molecular farming
 
Genetic improvement of microbial strains
Genetic improvement of microbial strainsGenetic improvement of microbial strains
Genetic improvement of microbial strains
 
Chloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationChloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformation
 
Plant transformation methods
Plant transformation methodsPlant transformation methods
Plant transformation methods
 
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
Biosaftey issues related to gm crops and transgenic variety release
 
Molecular tagging
Molecular tagging Molecular tagging
Molecular tagging
 
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transferAgrobacterium mediated gene transfer
Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
 
Molecular pharming
Molecular pharmingMolecular pharming
Molecular pharming
 
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvement
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvementBiotechnological approaches for crop improvement
Biotechnological approaches for crop improvement
 
Artificial seed
Artificial seedArtificial seed
Artificial seed
 
Role of insect resistance in plants
Role of insect resistance in plantsRole of insect resistance in plants
Role of insect resistance in plants
 

Similar to Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis

Traditional vs modern biotechnology
Traditional vs modern biotechnologyTraditional vs modern biotechnology
Traditional vs modern biotechnology
Janna Naypes
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmograce
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmo
grace dingle
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmo
grace dingle
 
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFETHE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
SAPTAKBHATTACHARJEE
 
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-Cpowerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
Maureen Villamora
 
GMF.pptx
GMF.pptxGMF.pptx
GMF.pptx
KishanKoyani2
 
Genetically modified foods
Genetically modified foodsGenetically modified foods
Genetically modified foods
atmapandey
 
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human HealthA Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
Lori Moore
 
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
theijes
 
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONGMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONNorma Rubi
 
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docxAfter receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
normanlane62630
 
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docxGuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
shericehewat
 
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDF
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDFGenetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDF
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDFGordana Zdjelar
 
Genetically modified crop
Genetically modified cropGenetically modified crop
Genetically modified crop
PPThelperkid
 
Genetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organismsGenetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organisms9931
 
Genetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organismsGenetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organisms9931
 

Similar to Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis (20)

GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODSGENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
 
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODSGENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
 
Traditional vs modern biotechnology
Traditional vs modern biotechnologyTraditional vs modern biotechnology
Traditional vs modern biotechnology
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmo
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmo
 
Con to gmo
Con to gmoCon to gmo
Con to gmo
 
Powerpoint lhyn
Powerpoint lhynPowerpoint lhyn
Powerpoint lhyn
 
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFETHE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
THE IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MODERN LIFE
 
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-Cpowerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
powerpoint presentation about GMO by maureen villamora BSED I-C
 
GMF.pptx
GMF.pptxGMF.pptx
GMF.pptx
 
Genetically modified foods
Genetically modified foodsGenetically modified foods
Genetically modified foods
 
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human HealthA Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
A Review On Impacts Of Genetically Modified Food On Human Health
 
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
 
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONGMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GMO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
 
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docxAfter receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made s.docx
 
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docxGuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
GuestCommentaryValeria Jefferson,R.E.H.S., C.F.S.P., M.docx
 
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDF
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDFGenetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDF
Genetically Modified Crops – A Potential Risk for Sustainable Agriculture.PDF
 
Genetically modified crop
Genetically modified cropGenetically modified crop
Genetically modified crop
 
Genetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organismsGenetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organisms
 
Genetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organismsGenetically modified organisms
Genetically modified organisms
 

More from Anik Banik

Different Molecular Techniques
Different Molecular TechniquesDifferent Molecular Techniques
Different Molecular Techniques
Anik Banik
 
Southern Blotting
Southern BlottingSouthern Blotting
Southern Blotting
Anik Banik
 
Motif & Domain
Motif & DomainMotif & Domain
Motif & Domain
Anik Banik
 
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
Anik Banik
 
In silico characterization of enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
In silico characterization of  enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...In silico characterization of  enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
In silico characterization of enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
Anik Banik
 
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through TransgenesisApplication of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
Anik Banik
 
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
Anik Banik
 
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infectionSalmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Anik Banik
 
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infectionSalmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Anik Banik
 
Food biotechnology in bangladesh
Food biotechnology in bangladesh Food biotechnology in bangladesh
Food biotechnology in bangladesh
Anik Banik
 
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver CarcinomaImmunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
Anik Banik
 
Rotating biological contactor
Rotating biological contactorRotating biological contactor
Rotating biological contactor
Anik Banik
 
Genetically Modified crop
Genetically Modified cropGenetically Modified crop
Genetically Modified crop
Anik Banik
 
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning VectorPlasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Anik Banik
 
Genetically Modified Crop
Genetically Modified CropGenetically Modified Crop
Genetically Modified Crop
Anik Banik
 
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning VectorPlasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Anik Banik
 

More from Anik Banik (16)

Different Molecular Techniques
Different Molecular TechniquesDifferent Molecular Techniques
Different Molecular Techniques
 
Southern Blotting
Southern BlottingSouthern Blotting
Southern Blotting
 
Motif & Domain
Motif & DomainMotif & Domain
Motif & Domain
 
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
 
In silico characterization of enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
In silico characterization of  enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...In silico characterization of  enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
In silico characterization of enzymes like protease, cellulase and pectinase...
 
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through TransgenesisApplication of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis
 
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
“Microbial Biomass” A Renewable Energy For The Future
 
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infectionSalmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infection
 
Salmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infectionSalmonella and E.coli infection
Salmonella and E.coli infection
 
Food biotechnology in bangladesh
Food biotechnology in bangladesh Food biotechnology in bangladesh
Food biotechnology in bangladesh
 
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver CarcinomaImmunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
Immunological Abnormalities in Liver Carcinoma
 
Rotating biological contactor
Rotating biological contactorRotating biological contactor
Rotating biological contactor
 
Genetically Modified crop
Genetically Modified cropGenetically Modified crop
Genetically Modified crop
 
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning VectorPlasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
 
Genetically Modified Crop
Genetically Modified CropGenetically Modified Crop
Genetically Modified Crop
 
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning VectorPlasmid as a Cloning Vector
Plasmid as a Cloning Vector
 

Recently uploaded

Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
DhatriParmar
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 

Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement through Transgenesis

  • 1. 1 Application of Genetic Engineering in Crop Improvement Through Transgenesis Introduction Genetic engineering is the direct manipulation of an organism's genes using biotechnology. It is a set of technologies used to change the genetic makeup of cells, including the transfer of genes within and across species boundaries to produce improved or novel organisms. New DNA is obtained by either isolating and copying the genetic material of interest using recombinant DNA methods or by artificially synthesising the DNA. In the current scenario, the most critical challenge faced by the human race is to provide food security for a growing population. By 2050, the human population will reach 10 billion and to feed the world, global food production needs to increase by 60–100%. Besides the growing population rate, extreme weather, reduced agricultural land availability, increasing biotic and abiotic stresses are significant constraints for farming and food production. Development of technologies that can contribute to crop improvement can increase production to some extent. Genetic manipulation techniques using physical, chemical and biological (T-DNA insertion/transposons) mutagenesis have contributed majorly in studying the role of genes and identifying the biological mechanisms for the improvement of crop species in the past few decades. For the past three decades, transgenic techniques have been used to understand basic plant biology and also used for crop improvement. However, the integration of transgenes into the host genome is non-specific, sometimes unstable and is a matter of public concern when it comes to edible crop species. A construct is usually created and used to insert this DNA into the host organism. The first recombinant DNA molecule was made by Paul Berg in 1972 by combining DNA from the monkey virus SV40 with the lambda virus. As well as inserting genes, the process can be used to remove, or "knock out", genes. The new DNA can be inserted randomly, or targeted to a specific part of the genome.Genetic modification for crop improvement. Genetic modification (GM) of crops involves the transfer of genes for specific traits between distantly related plant species using recombinant DNA technology known as transgenesis. Although there is a scientific consensus that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional food, GM food safety is a leading concern with critics. Gene flow, impact on non-target organisms, control of the food supply and intellectual property rights have also been raised as potential issues. Even before the creation of transgenics, the alteration of crops to improve their production was performed through selection. In fact, this selection has been going on for thousands of years and only in the past few centuries has it become a dedicated science onto itself. So, why has there been a push to switch from selection to the use of genetic techniques (transgenics) to improve crops over the recent decades? Simply put, to manipulate plants through selection takes many generations (i.e. large investments of time) and does not always work. Through the use of transgenics, one can produce plants with desired traits and even
  • 2. 2 increase yields to allow for more crops that last longer and withstand pests and disease. The Flavr Savr was engineered to have a longer shelf life, but most current GM crops are modified to increase resistance to insects and herbicides. What is a Transgenic Crop? A transgenic crop is a genetically modified organism (GMO). Transgenic indicates that a transfer of genes has occurred using recombinant DNA technology [1]. Generally a transgenic crop contains one or more genes that have been inserted artificially either from an unrelated plant or from different species altogether. Why do we use Transgenic Crops? Plants have been modified for many reasons over the years but the most common purpose is to produce the best products possible. Before recombinant DNA technology, it was possible to produce some improved products, although it was very difficult to do and many things could not be improved or changed. An improved product may involve changing the color or the size of a plant, making it more appealing to the buyer’s eye. Or it may be more practical, allowing increased tolerance to cold, frost, or drought; all making a crop easier to grow in a constantly changing environment. Goals like these are unattainable with traditional selection programs and thus transgenics is now preferred when trying to come up with new products to improve sales. One of the hottest areas right now is the modification of crops to increase the resistance of plants to insects and diseases they may carry. Improving resistance to these diseases and insects also reduces the need for herbicides and pesticides. This makes the plants safer for the consumer and allows the farmer to save money on chemicals. In conclusion, transgenic crops are an economically safer method of producing crop products, which makes them appealing and potentially profitable. Climate Change and Its Impact on Plant Genetic Resources The most profound and direct impacts of climate change over previous decade and the next few decades will surely be on agriculture and food security. The effects of climate change will also depend on current production conditions. The area where already being obstructed by other stresses, such as pollution and will likely to have more adverse impact by changing climate. Food production systems rely on highly selected cultivars under better endowed environments but it might be increasingly vulnerable to climate change impacts such as pest and disease spread. If food production levels decreases over the year, there will be huge pressure to cultivate the crops under marginal lands or implement unsustainable practices that, over the long-term, degrade lands and resources and adversely impact biodiversity on and near agricultural areas. In fact, such situations have already been experienced by most of the developing countries. These changes have been seen to cause a decrease in the variability of those genetic loci (alleles of a gene) controlling physical and phenotypic responses to changing climate. Therefore, genetic variation holds the key to the ability of populations and species to persist over evolutionary
  • 3. 3 period of time through changing environments . If this persists, neither any organism can predict its future (and evolutionary theory does not require them to) nor can any of those organisms be optimally adapted for all environmental conditions. Nonetheless, the current genetic composition of a crop species influences how well its members will adapt to future physical and biotic environments.The population can also migrate across the landscape over generations. By contrast, populations that have a narrow range of genotypes and are more phenotypically uniform may merely fail to survive and reproduce at all as the conditions become less locally favorable. Such populations are more likely to become extirpated (locally extinct), and in extreme cases the entire plant species may end up at risk of extinction. For example, the Florida Yew (Torreya taxifolia) is currently one of the rarest conifer species in North America. But in the early Holocene (10,000 years ago), when conditions in southeastern North America were cooler and wetter than today, the species was probably widespread. The reasons for that are not completely understood, but T. taxifolia failed to migrate towards the northward as climate changed during the Holocene. Today, it is restricted to a few locations in the Apalachicola River Basin in southern Georgia and the Florida panhandle. As the T. taxifolia story illustrates, once plant species are pushed into marginal habitat at the limitations of their physiological tolerance, they may enter an extinction vortex, a downward cycle of small populations, and so on. Reduced genetic variability is a key step in the extinction vortex. Gene banks must be better to respond to novel and increased demands on germplasm for adapting agriculture to climate change. Gene banks need to include different characteristics in their screening processes and their collections need to be comprehensive, including what are now considered minor crops, and that may come with huge impact on food baskets. Genetic Engineering for crop improvement Genetic engineering becomes a powerful technique that applicable for altering the genetic make up of the crop plants. It is achieved through transgenic or recombinant DNA technology. The crop plants having so many desired characters but due the presence of one or few unfavourable characters makes the crop to limit in its area and production. This makes the farmers to forcefully have to shift to other crops. And also to overcome the malnutritional problems facing a huge mass of the people of the world, transgenic technology helps in mitigating this problem in an effective manner. Recombinant technology is also helpful in solving the problems arising due to biotic and abiotic stresses. To over come all these problems, transgenic technology helps to transfer desired characters from various sources to required crop plants by identification and isolating the gene of our interest. The technology of genetic modification trough transgenic approach is more directed and the inserted genes can be easily followed. In contrast to green revolution that only emphasis on three main crops (rice, wheat and maize) and produced ambivalent results, the gene revolution represents a technical and ethical advance and can be use to improve the characteristics of all targeted plants with significantly enhanced social impacts. However, genetic engineering is not set to replace conventional plant breeding but is a modern tool for use of plant breeders to fasten the breeding programme.
  • 4. 4 The varieties of maize, tobacco, cotton etc., that are resistance to herbicide were developed by transformation of plants with glyphosate resistant gene through Agrobacterium mediated transformation. Transgenic technology yielded genetically modified (GM) crops having novel genes with favourable characteristics like higher yields, herbicide resistant, insect and disease resistant, drought resistant, salinity resistant, etc. Depending upon their preference, there are three methods for transformation of the novel genes are as follows:  Biological method  Mechanical method  Chemical method 1. Biological method: This method involves the use of biological systems for transformation of the desired gene or genes.  Agrobacterium mediated transformation: Agrobacterium remains on the preferred mechanism to introduce exogenous genes into plant cells. One of the reasons for this is the wide spectrum of plants that are susceptible to transformation by this bacterium.  A modified T-DNA region of the Ti (Tumor inducing) plasmid in which the genes responsible for tumor formation are removed and inserted the foreign novel gene by genetic engineering.  Viruses: Phages (Viruses that infect bacteria) and Tobacco Mosaic virus can be used as vectors for transformation of genes into plant cells. The technique is still being developed. 2. Mechanical method: It includes the use of equipments for transformation of gene is as follows; •Electrophoration: Is a process whereby electric pulses of high field strength are used to reversibly permiabilise cell membranes to facilitate uptake of DNA. Electrophoration has been successfully used for transforming plants in which efficient regeneration of plants from protoplast is possible. •Microinjection: In this case needles used for injecting DNA are with a diameter greater than cell diameter. DNA (0.3 ml) solution is injected with conventional syringe into region of plant which will develop into floral tillers fourteen days before meiosis.
  • 5. 5 •Biolistic or Microprojectile for DNA transfer: This method involves bombardment of particles carrying DNA or RNA of interest into target cells using high velocity transfer mechanism. This method can be used for any plant cells, leaves, root sections, embryo seeds and pollens. 3. Chemical method: This method using polyethylene glycol and calcium phosphate for gene transfer. How are Transgenic Crops Made? For many years plant breeding entailed the selection of the finest plants to get the best crops. In those days, variation occurred through induced mutation or hybridization where two or more plants were crossed. Selection occurred through nature, using a “selection of the fittest” concept, where only the seeds best adapted to that environment succeeded. For example, farmers selected only the biggest seeds with non-shattering seed heads, assuming these to be the best. Today, scientists can not only select, but also create crops by inserting genes to make a seeds bare any trait desired. In order to make a transgenic crop, there are five main steps: extracting DNA, cloning a gene of interest, designing the gene for plant infiltration, transformation, and finally plant breeding. Figure: Overview of how transgenic crops are created. To understand this process, one must first known a bit about DNA (deoxyribonucleic acids). DNA is the universal programming language of all cells and stores their genetic information. It contains thousands of genes, which are discrete segments of DNA that encode the information necessary to produce and assemble specific proteins. All genes require specific regions in order to be utilized (or expressed) by a cell. These regions include (see Figure 2): 1. A promoter region, which signals where a gene begins and it used to express the gene;
  • 6. 6 2. A termination sequence, which signals the end of a gene; 3. And the coding region, which contains the actual gene to be expressed. All these regions together allow a gene to create a protein. Once a gene is transcribed into a protein, it can then function as an enzyme to catalyze biochemical reactions or as a structural unit of a cell, both of which will contribute to the appearance of a particular trait in that organism. Figure: Gene Regions. All species are capable of turning DNA into protein through a process known as translation. This capability makes it possible to artificially put genes from one organism into another-a process generally termed transgenics. But just isolating random DNA and inserting it into another organism is not practical. We must first know what particular segments of DNA, and in particular what genes, to insert. Unfortunately, with reference to producing new crops, not much is known about which genes are responsible for increased plant yield, tolerance to different stresses and insects, color, or various other plant characteristics. Much of the research in transgenics is now focused on how to identify and sequence genes contributing to these characteristics. Genes that are determined to contribute to certain traits then need to be obtained in a significant amount before they can be inserted into another organism. In order to obtain the DNA comprising a gene, DNA is first extracted from cells and put into a bacterial plasmid. A plasmid is a molecular biological tool that allows any segment of DNA in be put into a carrier cell (usually a bacterial cell) and replicated to produce more of it. A bacterial cell (i.e. E. coli) that contains a plasmid can put aside and used over and over again to produce copies of the gene the researcher is interested in, a process that is generally referred to as “cloning” the gene. The word “cloning” referring to how many identical copies of the original gene can now be produced at will. Plasmids containing this gene can be used to modify the gene in any way the researcher sees fit, allowing novel effects on the gene trait to be produced . Once the gene of interest has been amplified, it is time to introduce it into the plant species we are interested in. The nucleus of the plant cell is the target for the new transgenic DNA. There are many methods of doing this but the two most common methods include the “Gene Gun” and Agrobacterium method. The “Gene Gun” method, also known as the micro-projectile bombardment method, is most commonly used in species such as corn and rice. As its name implies, this procedure involves
  • 7. 7 high velocity micro-projectiles to deliver DNA into living cells using a gun. It involves sticking DNA to small micro-projectiles and then firing these into a cell. This technique is clean and safe. It enables scientists to transform organized tissue of plant species and has a universal delivery system common to many tissue types from many different species1. It can give rise to un-wanted side effects, such as the gene of interest being rearranged upon entry or the target cell sustaining damage upon bombardment. Nevertheless, it has been quite useful for getting transgenes into organisms when no other options are available. The Agrobacterium method involves the use of a soil-dwelling bacteria known as Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which has the ability to infect plant cells with a piece of its DNA. The piece of DNA that infects a plant is integrated into a plants chromosome through a tumor-inducing plasmid (Ti plasmid), which can take control of the plant’s cellular machinery and use it to make many copies of its own bacterial DNA. The Ti plasmid is a large circular DNA particle that replicates independently of the bacterial chromosome . Figure : Transfer DNA on a plasmid in Agrobacterium The importance of this plasmid is that it contains regions of transfer DNA (tDNA), where a researcher can insert a gene, which can be transferred to a plant cell through a process known as a floral dip. A floral dip involves dipping flowering plants into a solution of Agrobacterium carrying the gene of interest, followed by the transgenic seeds being collected directly from the plant. This process is useful in that it is a natural method of transfer and therefore thought of as a more acceptable technique. In addition, Agrobacterium is capable of transferring large fragments of DNA very efficiently without substantial rearrangements, followed by maintaining high stability of the gene that was transferred . One of the biggest limitations of Agrobacterium is that not all important food crops can be infected by this bacteria. Significance of Genetic Conservation of Crop Plants The growing population pressure and urbanization of agricultural lands and rapid modernization in every field of our day-to-day activities that create biodiversity are getting too eroded in direct and indirect way. For instance, land degradation, deforestation, urbanization, coastal development, and environmental stress are collectively leading to large-scale extinction of plant species especially agriculturally important food crops. On the other hand, system driven famine such as, Irish potato famine and Southern corn leaf blight epidemic in USA are the two instances of food crises caused by large-scale cultivation of genetically homogenous varieties of potato and corn, respectively. Even after these historical events, the importance of PGR had only got
  • 8. 8 popular recognition when the spread of green revolution across cultivated crops threatened the conservation of land races. Green revolution technologies introduced improved crop varieties that have higher yields, and it was hoped that they would increase farmers’ income. Consequently, the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Researches (CIGAR) initiated gene banks and research centers of domestication for conserving PGR in most of the stable food crops around the world. Center for domestication: maize (Mexico), wheat and barley (middle/near East and North Africa), rice (North China), and potatoes (Peru); for further information see http://www.cigar.org/center/index.html.) The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) supported the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (ITPGR) and UN supported the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) which are the international agreements that recognize the important role of genetic diversity conservation. Such treaty still plays in current and future food production as one of the major supremo. Genetic diversity is the key pillar of biodiversity and diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems, which was defined at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit. However, the problem is that modern crop varieties, especially, have been developed primarily for high yielding potential under well endowed production conditions. Such varieties are often not suitable for low income farmers in marginal production environments as they are facing highly variable stress conditions. Land races or traditional varieties have been found to have higher stability (adaptation over time) in low-input agriculture under marginal environments, thus, their cultivation may contribute farm level resilience in face of food production shocks. This is especially true in some part of Ethiopia where agroclimatic conditions are challenging, technological progress is slow, and market institutions are poorly developed and have no appropriate infrastructure. The goal of conservation genetics is to maintain genetic diversity at many levels and to provide tools for population monitoring and assessment that can be used for conservation planning. Every individual is genetically unique by nature. Conservation efforts and related research are rarely directed towards individuals but genetic variation is always measured in individuals and this can only be estimated for collections of individuals in a population/species. It is possible to identify the genetic variation from phenotypic variation either by quantitative traits (traits that vary continuous and are governed by many genes, e.g., plant height) or discrete traits traits that fall into discrete categories and are governed by one or few major genes (e.g., white, pink, or red petal color in certain flowers) which are referred to as qualitative traits. Genetic variation can also be identified by examining variation at the level of enzymes using the process of protein electrophoresis. Further, genetic variations can also be examined by the order of nucleotides in the DNA sequence. Applications of Genetic Engineering in crop improvement Transgenic breeding enables the transfer of genes across taxonomic boundaries unlike conventional breeding where it is possible to transfer genes from closely related species only. It
  • 9. 9 also offers new avenues of plant improvement in shorter period compared to conventional breeding and new possibility of incorporating new genes without problems incompatibility. 1. Herbicide resistant: herbicides normally affect processes like photosynthesis or biosynthesis of essential amino acids. Transformation of cereal cropswith Glyphosate resistant gene (Glyphosate = herbicide). Herbicide tolerant (HT) soybean and canola are released for commercial cultivation. 2. Insect resistant: the genes which responsible for the production of delta-endotoxine in Bacillus thuringiensis is used as biological insecticide. Thetransgene Cry 1AC has been transferred to many crops for example looper resistance in soybean, pod borer resistance in groundnut, head borer resistance in sunflower, semi-looper resistance in castor etc. snowdrop lectin gene from snow drop (Galanthus nivalis) was transferred to brassica and safflower for aphid resistant. 3. Resistance against viral infection: coat protein gene from Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV) was transferred to develop resistant varieties of crop plants.The resistant varieties developed in crop plants like soybean for resistant to yellow mosaic virus, groundnut for resistant to bud and stem necrosis, clump and stripe virus resistance, whereas in sunflower, resistance developed for bud necrosis. 4. Resistance against bacterial and fungal pathogens: Chitinase genes was transferred to crops like Brassica, Soybean, Sunflower, Sesame etc foralternaria leaf spot disease, where Figure: Applications of Genetic Engineering in crop improvement
  • 10. 10 as in case of groundnut which was introduced against leaf spot and alternaria blight and in castor for Botrytis resistance. Acetyl transferase gene was transferred for wildfire disease of tobacco caused by pseudomonas syringae. 5. Improvement of the nutritional qualities in crop plants: The carotene gene has been transferred from daphoddils to rice grains (Golden Rice) forincreasing Beta-carotene content in grains and for solving the blindness in childerns. Antisense Fae 1 gene transferred to Brassica napus and Brassica juncea for low erucic acid content and also for low linolenic acid content in case of linseed. Antisense ricin gene transferred to castor for reduction of ricin content and RCA endosperm in castor seeds. Antisense sterol desaturase/ + ac1 inserted into sunflower for developing high oleic acid containing types. 6. Improvement of crop plants against abiotic stresses: transcription factor genes, structural genes, regulatory genes were introduced into the groundnut,soybean, Brassica juncea, B. napus to develop drought and salinity tolerant types. 7. Development of transgenic male sterile lines: transgenic male sterile lines of safflower Brassica juncea were developed through the transfer of Barnase gene from Bacteria (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens). 8. A long term goal in agriculture is to introduce the genes (Nif genes) for nitrogen fixation in crop plants. There is a need to establish reliable protocols for genetic engineering of crop plants so that these crops also could be brought under the umbrella of crops amenable for genetic engineering. This technology also increased our capacity to reduce disease susceptible varieties and enhance the efficiency of production. The greatest challenge in agriculture is to improve food grain production and eradication of malnutritional problem in the developing countries and hopefully this technique will be applied to the regions where food shortage is greatest. By knowing the present problems of farmers and also health point of view, developing safe and efficient transgenic plants is needed. For achieving these, there is need of intensifying research at national and international levels to ensure that biotechnology leads to second revolution in agriculture, which both productive and sustainable. Synergy between GM breeding and traditional plant breeding needs to be further strengthened. Presentstatus of transgenic crops The first transgenic plant product marketed commercially was the well‐ known ‘Flavr Savr’ tomato which had been modified to contain reduced levels of the cell wall softening enzyme polygalacturonase. Tomato purée with a similar type of modification has been on the market in the UK since February 1996. Since that time, however, there has been a massive expansion in the
  • 11. 11 growth of transgenic field crops, particularly maize, soybean, oilseed rape, and cotton, such that in North America transgenic varieties now represent the majority of the acreage of these crops. For example, it is now estimated that 70% of the Canadian oilseed rape crop in 1999 will be genetically modified. Most of the varieties grown to date have been modified with genes for herbicide or insect resistance, both of which provide a significant economic benefit for the farmer. Material from these modified crops, particularly soybean and maize, is now imported into the European Union in large quantities. However, in several European countries there is now considerable consumer resistance to food products containing such GM constituents, either in the native form or as processed derivatives (e.g. soya lecithin). In the UK this resistance seems to be based primarily on a mistrust of the government regulatory process, allied to a strong desire for choice (to date the commodity GM products have not been segregated from their non‐ GM equivalent). These concerns have led to many retailers removing GM soya and maize products from sale, though enzymes and vitamins from GM microbes remain as common components of many foods and drinks. Pending the outcome of ‘farm scale’ trials designed to monitor the environmental impact of GM crops, there has been an associated delay in the granting of permits for the growth of such crops for sale. Figure : Present status of transgenic crops
  • 12. 12 Advantages of Transgenic Plant: 1.Food supplies become predictable. When crop yields become predictable, then the food supply becomes predictable at the same time. This gives us the ability to reduce the presence of food deserts around the world, providing a greater population with a well-rounded nutritional opportunity that may not have existed in the past. 2. Nutritional content can be improved. Genetic modifications do more than add pest resistance or weather resistance to GMO crops. The nutritional content of the crops can be altered as well, providing a denser nutritional profile than what previous generations were able to enjoy. This means people in the future could gain the same nutrition from lower levels of food consumption. The UN Food and Agricultural Organization notes that rice, genetically modified to produce high levels of Vitamin A, have helped to reduce global vitamin deficiencies. 3. Genetically modified foods can have a longer shelf life. Instead of relying on preservatives to maintain food freshness while it sits on a shelf, genetically modified foods make it possible to extend food life by enhancing the natural qualities of the food itself. According to Environmental Nutrition, certain preservatives are associated with a higher carcinogen, heart disease, and allergy risk. 4. We receive medical benefits from GMO crops. Through a process called “pharming,” it is possible to produce certain proteins and vaccines, along with other pharmaceutical goods, thanks to the use of genetic modifications. This practice offers cheaper methods of improving personal health and could change how certain medications are provided to patients in the future. Imagine being able to eat your dinner to get a tetanus booster instead of receiving a shot in the arm – that’s the future of this technology. 5. It creates foods that are more appealing to eat. Colors can be changed or improved with genetically modified foods so they become more
  • 13. 13 pleasing to eat. Spoon University reports that deeper colors in foods changes how the brain perceives what is being eaten. Deeper red colors make food seem to be sweeter, even if it is not. Brighter foods are associated with better nutrition and improved flavors. 6. Genetically modified foods are easierto transport. Because GMO crops have a prolonged shelf life, it is easier to transport them greater distances. This improvement makes it possible to take excess food products from one community and deliver it to another that may be experiencing a food shortage. GMO foods give us the opportunity to limit food waste, especially in the developing world, so that hunger can be reduced and potentially eliminated. 7. Herbicides and pesticides are used less often. Herbicides and pesticides create certain hazards on croplands that can eventually make the soil unusable. Farmers growing genetically modified foods do not need to use these products as often as farmers using traditional growing methods, allowing the soil to recover its nutrient base over time. Because of the genetic resistance being in the plant itself, the farmer still achieves a predictable yield at the same time. DisadvantagesofTransgenic Plant 1.GMO crops may cause antibiotic resistance. Iowa State University research shows that when crops are modified to include antibiotics and other items that kill germs and pests, it reduces the effectiveness of an antibiotic or other medication when it is needed in the traditional sense. Because the foods contain trace amounts of the antibiotic when consumed, any organisms that would be affected by a prescription antibiotic have built an immunity to it, which can cause an illness to be more difficult to cure. 2. Farmers growing genetically modified foods have a greater legal liability. Crops that are genetically modified will create seeds that are genetically modified. Cross- pollination is possible between GMO crops and non-GMO crops as well, even when specified farming practices are followed. Because many of the crops and seeds that produce GMO crops are patented, farmers that aren’t even involved in growing these foods are subjected to a higher
  • 14. 14 level of legal liability. Farmers that do grow GMO crops could also face liabilities for letting seeds go to other fields or allowing cross-pollination to occur. 3. Genes go into different plant species. Crops share fields with other plants, including weeds. Genetic migrations are known to occur. What happens when the genes from an herbicide-resistant crop get into the weeds it is designed to kill? Interactions at the cellular level could create unforeseen complications to future crop growth where even the benefits of genetically modified foods may not outweigh the problems that they cause. One example: dozens of weed species are already resistant to atrazine. 4. Independent research is not allowed. 6 companies control most of the genetically modified foods market at the core level. Because most GMO foods are made from corn, wheat, or soybeans, even food manufacturers that use these crops are at the mercy of the manufacturer’s preferences. Over 50% of the seed producers that have created the GMO foods market prohibit any independent research on the final crops as an effort to protect their profits. 5. Some genetically modified foods may present a carcinogen exposure risk. A paper that has been twice-published, but retracted once as well, showed that crops tolerant to commercial pesticides greatly increased the risk of cancer development in rats. The information from this research study, though limited, has been widely circulated and creates the impression that all GMO foods are potentially hazardous. The advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified foods can spark a bitter debate. There is an advantage in providing the world with better food access, but more food should not come at the expense of personal health. GMO foods must be labeled in Europe and petitions in the US are seeking the same thing. We deserve to know what we’re eating and how that food is grown. Knowing more about genetically modified foods allows us to do just that. The future of CRISPR technologiesin agriculture Conventional plant breeding is unlikely to meet increasing food demands and other environmental challenges. By contrast, CRISPR technology is erasing barriers to genome editing and could revolutionize plant breeding. However, to fully benefit from the CRISPR revolution, we should focus on resolving its technical and regulatory uncertainties.Genetic diversity is a key source for trait improvement in plants. Creating variations in the gene pool is the foremost
  • 15. 15 requirement for developing novel plant varieties. Once the desired alterations are achieved, transgenes can be crossed out from the improved variety. Crop improvement has been done for years via traditional plant breeding techniques or through various physical, chemical (e.g., gamma radiation, ethyl methanesulfonate) and biological methods (e.g., T-DNA, transposon insertion) leading to point mutations, deletions, rearrangements, and gene duplications. The advent of site-specific nucleases (SSNs) highlighted the importance of site directed mutagenesis over random mutagenesis (Osakabe et al., 2010; Sikora et al., 2011). Random mutagenesis has also its own list of shortcomings too. It produces multiple undesirable rearrangements and mutations, which are expensive and very complex to screen. Gene editing uses engineered SSNs to delete, insert or replace a DNA sequence. Development of the engineered endonucleases/mega-nucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and type II clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) paved the way for single nucleotide excision mechanism for crop improvement. These genome-editing technologies use programmable nucleases to increase the specificity of the target locus. Genome editing modifies a specific genome in precise and predictable manner. There could be varieties of genes, which could be altered in different cell types and organisms with the aid of nucleases that offer targeted alterations. ZFNs is one of the oldest gene editing technologies, developed in the 1990s and owned by Sangamo BioSciences. ZFNs are premeditated restriction enzymes having sequence specific DNA binding zinc finger motifs and non-specific cleavage domain of Fok1 endonuclease. The emergence of CRISPR technology supersedes ZFNs and TALENs and used widely as a novel approach from “methods of the year” in 2011 to “breakthrough of the year” in 2015 for their captivated genome editing. This prokaryotic system is promptly accepted for genome editing in eukaryotic host cells. CRISPR has an added advantage of gene knockout over RNAi, which is a well-known technique for gene knockdown. CRISPR targets the endogenous genes that are impossible to specifically target using RNAi technology with more precision and simplicity. The CRISPR edited tomatoes will be expected to have enhanced flavor, sugar content and aroma as compared to modern commercial varieties; corn is made resistant to drought with high yield per hectare; wheat is edited against powdery mildew disease, and mushrooms are targeted to reduce the melanin content. These genome-editing technologies use programmable nucleases to increase the specificity of the target locus. Genome editing modifies a specific genome in precise and predictable manner.
  • 16. 16 Different plasmids with specific Cas9 activity: Crop Plasmid Gene/insert name Promoter Selectable Marker Cas 9 type Significance Reference sgRNA expressio n Cas9 expression Oryza sativa pRGEB3 2 PTG1/Cas9 U3 snoRNA Rice ubiquitin Hygromycin Cut Enhanced multiplex editing capability via endogenous tRNA processing system Xie et al., 2015 Zea mays pHSE401 gRNA scaffold AtU6-26 35S Hygromycin Cut Improved designingof CRISPR/Cas9 binary vector. Easy method for one or more gRNA assembly in expression cassette, high efficiency mutant generation Xinget al., 2014 Arabidopsis thaliana pKI 1.1R Human codon optimized spCas9 U6-26p CaMV35S , WOX2, RPS5A Hygromycin Cut pKIR vector harboring RPS5A maintains high constitutive expression andheritable muatations at all developmenta l stages Tsutsui and Higashiyama , 2017 Arabidopsis, Nicotiana benthamiana , Oryza sativa pYPQ159 hSpCas9D10 A (human codon optimized) AtU6-26 2× 35S Spectinomyci n Nick This toolbox provides reagents to efficiently assemble DNA constructs for monocots and dicots using Golden Gate Lowder et al., 2015
  • 17. 17 Should We Use Transgenic Crops? In the end, the perceived advantages and disadvantages of transgenic crops must be married to each other to provide a crop that is environmentally sound and non-hazardous. Producers of transgenic crops and the agencies that study their effects are aware of this point. However, to date, there has been little evidence to support either case. More research is required in this field to determine the true safety of these plants and to decide whether they are safe for both the environment and for those who consume these products over the ages. At the least, most would agree that the potential advantage of producing crops that provide the human population with more and cheaper food makes transgenic technology a useful invention. Conclusion The primary advantage of genetically modified foods is that crop yields become more consistent and productive, allowing more people to be fed. According to Oxfam, the world currently produced about 20% more food calories than what is required for every human being to be healthy. GMOs are not without disadvantages. Although there are no conclusive links, Brown University concluded that changes to foods on a genetic level combine proteins that humans are not used to consuming. This may increase the chances of an allergic reaction occurring. Since 1999, the rates of food allergies in children has increased from 3.4% to 5.1%. References 1. Stephens J., Barakate A. (2017). “Gene editing technologies – ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9,” in Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences 2 Edn eds Thomas B., Murray B. G., Murphyp D. J., editors. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; ) 157–161. 10.1016/B978-0-12- 394807-6.00242-2 2. Ma X, Zhu Q, Chen Y, Liu YG,Mol Plant. 2016 Jul 6; 9(7):961-74. 3.Chawla HS. 2000. Introduction to Plant Biotechnology. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers Inc. 4. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn DD, Rees M. 2001. Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 409: 682-3. 5. Ferber D. 1999. Risks and benefits: GM crops in the cross hairs. Science 286: 1662-6.
  • 18. 18 6. Gasser CS, Fraley RT. 1989. Genetically engineered plants for crop improvement. Science 244(4910): 1293-9. 7. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. 1999. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399(6733): 214. Additional Reading and Texts Consulted 1. Colorado State University. 2002. Transgenic Crops: An introduction and resource guide. 2. Animation of the process of cloning genes 3. Animation of how a gene gun works 4. Buchanan B. 2001. Genetic engineering and the allergy issue. Plant Physiology 126:5-7. Web link :  faostat3.fao.org  vittana.org