Prospects
for
India’s Emerging
Apple Market
Apple production
 Average production=1.98 million tonn(7th
largest
producer)2008-2009 in 274,000 hectare. (source:
NHB Database 2009)
 Production characterized by slow growth and low
yield
 Most orchard and cultivars are old
Source :NHB Database2009,National Horticulture Board
1.35
kg/year
•Slow consumption growth rate
despite raising income
 High Apple prices reduce demand
•Income and price responsiveness of Apple
demand
Apple Trade
 Apple imports small but rising.
 U.S. apple holds largest share of a
competitive market.
 Seasonal factors influence trade
 Apple tariff high relative to other fruit
 Non tariff measures affecting trade
 Measures of protection for Indian apple
 Quality and price creates separate market for
domestic and imported apples
….
Seasonal factors influence trade
United states 19501 MT (33.3%)
China 18858 MT (32.3%)
Chile 14873 MT (25.5%)
New Zealand 3762 MT (6.4%)
Australia 1039 MT (1.7%)
Italy 156 MT (0.26%)
Others 213 MT (0.36%)
Total 58402 MT
India’s total import and share of exporter
(2007) IN METRIC TON
SOURCE: FAOSTAT 2007
China is a potential competitor of U.S.
in apple export to India
 Worlds largest producer of apple
(29.85 million ton 2008-09),
NHB database,2009
 Price competitiveness
 Sweet tasted Fuji variety getting popularity
 Large exportable surplus
 Extended supply period (Nov.-July)
 Fruits packed in individual styrofoam packing
Fuji variety
Washington red
Apple marketing
 Grower price risk impedes market
improvement
 Post harvest handling practices are poor
 Wholesale price formation
 Domestic market poorly integrated
 Retail prices of domestic and imported
apples
 Lack of investment for domestic apples
Conclusion
 Expanding high middle class consumers will
be potential customer of imported apples
 Domestic produce is far behind the quality and
less competitive.
 High tariff rates with higher intermediaries
margin
 Phytosanitory requirements, pesticide residue,
food safety rules potential barrier for import
 China is a potential competitors of U.S.
(accounts 40% of the world production), source: FAO
website 10.2.2010
 Reduction in the marketing margins,
tariff , and import price are key concern
area for U.S.A’s apple export to India
Om Prakash Gupta
 PGDMA10-12
National Academy of Agricultural Research
Management
Hyderabad, India

Apple presentation

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Apple production  Averageproduction=1.98 million tonn(7th largest producer)2008-2009 in 274,000 hectare. (source: NHB Database 2009)  Production characterized by slow growth and low yield  Most orchard and cultivars are old
  • 4.
  • 6.
    1.35 kg/year •Slow consumption growthrate despite raising income
  • 7.
     High Appleprices reduce demand •Income and price responsiveness of Apple demand
  • 8.
    Apple Trade  Appleimports small but rising.  U.S. apple holds largest share of a competitive market.  Seasonal factors influence trade
  • 9.
     Apple tariffhigh relative to other fruit
  • 10.
     Non tariffmeasures affecting trade  Measures of protection for Indian apple  Quality and price creates separate market for domestic and imported apples ….
  • 11.
  • 12.
    United states 19501MT (33.3%) China 18858 MT (32.3%) Chile 14873 MT (25.5%) New Zealand 3762 MT (6.4%) Australia 1039 MT (1.7%) Italy 156 MT (0.26%) Others 213 MT (0.36%) Total 58402 MT India’s total import and share of exporter (2007) IN METRIC TON SOURCE: FAOSTAT 2007
  • 13.
    China is apotential competitor of U.S. in apple export to India  Worlds largest producer of apple (29.85 million ton 2008-09), NHB database,2009  Price competitiveness  Sweet tasted Fuji variety getting popularity  Large exportable surplus  Extended supply period (Nov.-July)  Fruits packed in individual styrofoam packing Fuji variety Washington red
  • 14.
    Apple marketing  Growerprice risk impedes market improvement  Post harvest handling practices are poor  Wholesale price formation  Domestic market poorly integrated  Retail prices of domestic and imported apples  Lack of investment for domestic apples
  • 16.
    Conclusion  Expanding highmiddle class consumers will be potential customer of imported apples  Domestic produce is far behind the quality and less competitive.  High tariff rates with higher intermediaries margin  Phytosanitory requirements, pesticide residue, food safety rules potential barrier for import
  • 17.
     China isa potential competitors of U.S. (accounts 40% of the world production), source: FAO website 10.2.2010  Reduction in the marketing margins, tariff , and import price are key concern area for U.S.A’s apple export to India
  • 19.
    Om Prakash Gupta PGDMA10-12 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management Hyderabad, India