The document discusses the difference between a summary and analysis. A summary maintains the key ideas and events from the original work but uses simpler language and shorter sentences. An analysis breaks down the parts of the original work and examines each component. It makes arguments and inferences about the author's assumptions through critical thinking and observations. While a summary simply reports the sequence of events that happened, an analysis evaluates and examines the work.

1. Analysis Vs Summary

2. The Lecture Video was very interesting, since im a international student sometimes its very hard to identify the difference but this video helped me out erasing all the doubts because the video was very clear and consistent.

3. Summary : is when you make a reduction of history, essay or any source of writting maitining the same idea, and also using the same format and wording that the author is projecting. You can idenify this writting when the author or the writting who wrote the summary uses the words or phrases like ¨the story is about…¨ ¨the writters idea was…¨etc Summarization its done preatty much by telling the story or basic idea with out making an argument or an examination like analizys.

4. Almost every author has a pourpose for his writting, for example Informative writting, poetry, persuasive writting, historycal writting. And most of the time authors are always sending messages trying to inform, persuade etc and its the readers problem to undestand and analyze each message. How can you do this? Analyzing! My assumptions of analysis are that it goes above summarization you actually take apart in pieces the entire document or poetry and you examine each and every part of it, so you can point out what you think is valuable and what its not. You are analyzing when you take closer look to the document or any source of writting, making arguments and convining you thoughts with the authors assumptions