Case Study
Karamchand Appliances Pvt. Ltd. (KAPL)KAPL’s Brand ‘All Out’ is almost a generic	 name for liquid vaporizers.Liquid Mosquito Vaporizers is a Rs.4 bn Segment in India with ‘All Out’ having 69% market share in 1999.( Result of conversion of large no. of customers to vaporizer users).KAPL managed to wrest market share amidst stiff competition from corporate giants like Godrej Sara Lee Ltd (GSLL) and Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL).Background
Technological innovations1stMover AdvantageAggressive MarketingReasons for Success
Product: First of its kind/ New variantQuality/ Technologically soundTransition – Cord to plugProduct FeaturesHigh Quality PackagingMarketing Mix Analysis
Price: Price was initially high to recover cost of initial investmentFlexible pricing strategyMarketing Mix Analysis
Place: Behind its competitors in terms of accessibilityThe only P in which KAPL was behind its major competitors was “Place”.GSLL and R&C were multi-product giants whereas KAPL was a newcomer with a single product. Hence the former companies (before launching vaporizers) already had well established distribution networks.Marketing Mix Analysis
Promotion: Unconventional advertising strategyHindi Movie Video CassettesFM RadioEvening News Program/ Test Cricket CommentaryMovie Songs/fight sequence on Doordarshan and SitiCableSeries of failed ads by agencies followed by cost effective approach by promotersAdapting ideas from the parent companyHigh mind recallMarketing Mix Analysis
Invested heavily in other categories while ALL OUT had a single point focusCould not catch up initially with the advertising challenges poised by ALL OUTEntry into the vaporizer segment led to the  overall expansion of the marketOther Competitors - Failure
SWOT AnalysisWeaknessHarmful effect of chemicals
Advertising criticized by the industry
Major profits only through 1 productStrengthsAdvertising Strategy

All Out case study

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Karamchand Appliances Pvt.Ltd. (KAPL)KAPL’s Brand ‘All Out’ is almost a generic name for liquid vaporizers.Liquid Mosquito Vaporizers is a Rs.4 bn Segment in India with ‘All Out’ having 69% market share in 1999.( Result of conversion of large no. of customers to vaporizer users).KAPL managed to wrest market share amidst stiff competition from corporate giants like Godrej Sara Lee Ltd (GSLL) and Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL).Background
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Product: First ofits kind/ New variantQuality/ Technologically soundTransition – Cord to plugProduct FeaturesHigh Quality PackagingMarketing Mix Analysis
  • 5.
    Price: Price wasinitially high to recover cost of initial investmentFlexible pricing strategyMarketing Mix Analysis
  • 6.
    Place: Behind itscompetitors in terms of accessibilityThe only P in which KAPL was behind its major competitors was “Place”.GSLL and R&C were multi-product giants whereas KAPL was a newcomer with a single product. Hence the former companies (before launching vaporizers) already had well established distribution networks.Marketing Mix Analysis
  • 7.
    Promotion: Unconventional advertisingstrategyHindi Movie Video CassettesFM RadioEvening News Program/ Test Cricket CommentaryMovie Songs/fight sequence on Doordarshan and SitiCableSeries of failed ads by agencies followed by cost effective approach by promotersAdapting ideas from the parent companyHigh mind recallMarketing Mix Analysis
  • 8.
    Invested heavily inother categories while ALL OUT had a single point focusCould not catch up initially with the advertising challenges poised by ALL OUTEntry into the vaporizer segment led to the overall expansion of the marketOther Competitors - Failure
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Major profits onlythrough 1 productStrengthsAdvertising Strategy