The document discusses the integration of AI tools, like ChatGPT, in educational practices at Karolinska Institutet, highlighting both student perspectives and the implications for teaching. A survey of Swedish university students showed that while they are generally familiar with AI and supportive of its use, there is uncertainty about its regulation and concerns regarding cheating. The text emphasizes the importance of subjective experiences, collaboration, and the role of educators in adapting these technologies to enhance learning and assessment processes.

1. AI och ChatGPT - Användarsperspektivet
Presenterad av Andrew Maunder – IKT pedagog, UoL
PPT anpassad från Mats Brenner, Educational developer at UoL

2. Mål
• Att få tillfälle använda, pröva på att producera, utforska/upptäcka och
undersöka lärverktyg som använder ChatGPT/AI
• Att få tillfälle reflektera vad ChatGPT/AI i praktiken kan innebära kring ett
nytänkande om sin egen undervisnings- och examinationspraktik
• Att få möjlighet till erfarenhetsutbyte och kollegialt lärande kring ChatGPT/AI
• Att få möljighet sammanfatta och identifiera sina utforskande erfarenheter
på ett kortfattat sätt.
• Att få tillfälle avgöra, jämföra och relatera till sina egen undervisnings- och
examinationspraktik.
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 2

3. Invasive species? (to deal with rapid change)
• AI-influenser med så kallad disruptiv och kreativ
destruktion – ses alltså som invasiv
• Vi vill kunna tygla, tygla, hålla tillbaka och tämja
teknik enligt våra kärnvärden
• Från stabilitet till instabil
• Var nostalgisk, men inte sentimental
• Känner förlust
• Stå inför en förändring – bra att vara medveten om
vad du tänker göra med den
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 4

4. Benefit realization - stakeholder analysis
(nyttorealisering, digg.se)
Stakeholder Quantitative benefit Qualitative benefit
Teacher Create discussion question ?
Examinator Create MCQ questions ?
Researcher ? Manage datasets
Students ? ?
Administrators ? ?
Librarians Information Retrieval (IR) ?
University - research ? ?
Business - market ? ?
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 5

5. Använda eller förbjuda?
• NEWS ARTICLE, THU, MAY 11, 2023: Students
positive towards AI, but uncertain about what
counts as cheating REF: Students positive towards
AI, but uncertain about what counts as cheating -
Chalmers (cision.com)
• Report, 2023: Chatbots and other AI for learning:
A survey of use and views among university
students in Sweden - 5,894 students from
across Swedish universities were surveyed about
their use of and attitudes towards AI for learning
purposes, both about chatbots (such ChatGPT)
and other AI language tools (such as Grammarly).
REF: Chatbots and other AI for learning: A survey of
use and views among university students in
Sweden (chalmers.se)
Summary of results
• 95 percent of students are familiar with ChatGPT,
while awareness of other chatbots is very low.
• 56 percent are positive about using chatbots in
their studies; 35 percent use ChatGTP regularly.
• 60 percent are opposed to a ban on chatbots, and
77 percent are against a ban on other AI tools (such
as Grammarly) in education.
• More than half of the students do not know if their
institution has guidelines for how AI can be used in
education; one in four explicitly says that
their institution lack such regulations.
• 62 percent believe that using chatbots during
examinations is cheating.
• Students express some concern about AI
development, and there is particular concern over the
impact of chatbots on future education.
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 6

6. Förstår studenterna reglerna?
7
Malmström, H., Stöhr, C., & Ou, A. W. (2023). Chatbots and other AI for learning: A survey of use
and views among university students in Sweden. (Chalmers Studies in Communication and Learning in
Higher Education 2023:1) https://doi.org/10.17196/cls.csclhe/2023/01

7. Lärarperspektivet
"In organizations, we should ask what
the meaning of policy, routine,
protocols, systems and
documentation is – and only do things
that can be justified and really
contribute to a better activities"
Mats Alvesson, Prof Univ of Bath & Anna
Jonsson, Docent org. Researcher Lund univ.
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 8
4 oktober 2023

8. Befintliga AI-system och integrationer
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 9
AI search tool Keenious - Stockholm University Library (su.se)

9. Exempel: Produktions- och inlärningsverktyg med AI
Inse riskerna med att använda AI,
• partiskhet (bias),
• upphovsrätt
• GDPR och
• Andra relaterade policyer och procedurer är
också viktiga.
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 10
REF: AI Tools for Teachers – Rachel Arthur writes

10. Minska arbetsbelastningen med AI
"Given that around 2,000 new AI
tools were launched in March (2023)
alone, it's almost impossible for
teachers to stay up to date on the
latest and greatest tools.
After all, we want AI to reduce our
workload, not increase it with
constant innovation."
Rachel Arthur - Head of Computing - Programme Development at
Teach First
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 11

11. Different perspectives – Prosumer / Prosument
Perspective
Prosumer
Consumer
Producer
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 12

12. Perspective Prosumer
• Learning tools for produce and consume, example https://teachermatic.com/
• Perpective "producer", "consumer" or as curator vis-à-vis Prosumer - in social
networks we are often both consumers and producers, we ourselves contribute to the
content.
• See what futurologist Alvin Toffler (1984) in his book "The Third Wave" calls
prosumers. A merger of producer and consumer.
• A prosumer can challenge the traditional image of a consumer, by embracing the
characteristics of our traditional image of the producer.
REF: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosument och Prosumer - Wikipedia
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 13

13. Student generated content (SGC)
• "Content that is produced by students, often for sharing with peers and/or a wider audience on the Internet, as distinct
from instructor-supplied content such as course notes and textbooks. It is arguable that the main benefits to be gained
from student-generated content lie in the processes of content creation and knowledge construction, as opposed
to the end products themselves." REF: What is Student-Generated Content | IGI Global (igi-global.com)
• Questions: "who creates the lecture? ✦ who creates study questions? ✦ who creates quiz/exam questions? ✦
who creates the exam rubric ✦ who creates seminar/discussion questions?"
• "Student generated content (SGC) promotes a digital learning environment where students are prosumers; that is,
both content producers and consumers, co-creating, collaborating and sharing their work with other students.
Meanwhile, the tutor takes on the role of facilitator encouraging students to search for a deeper
understanding of the subject matter via discussion & analysis in seminars. For students, a wide range of
cognitive disciplines are needed to successfully filter subject reading material and to identify content useful
for: presentation to their peers; peer assessment; and course examination." REF: Satish Patel, student generated
content - Home (weebly.com)
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 14

14. SGC and ABC Learning Design
• The normative learning & teaching environment in most educational establishments at all levels is that of students having to
consume content made by others. Although students have always generated their own content by way of essays, papers, lab
reports, etc. this form of generated content is, for the most part, used for testing and examination purposes. Very little is
actually shared among students for socially constructed newer meaning. REF: Satish Patel (2013), UMU
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 15

15. Different perspectives – Prosumer
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 17
Producer Consumer
Prosumer

16. Example: Teachermatic – ease of use with ChatGPT
• Create MCQ faster and easier
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 18

17. Creating Rubrics
• Create grading criteria
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 19

18. Create Flashcards
• Create multiple Flashcards faster
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 20

19. Example: Can reduce the workload for teachers –
"saves time"
• Designing all the resources teachers need to teach,
assess and support takes a lot of time; time they can
spend engaging students or developing their teaching
or examination.
• TeacherMatic partly helps to start the creative
process for the teacher by producing initial "drafts" of
what the teacher is working on but has to work with.
• Using TeacherMatic can reduce the time it takes to
revise or produce a new teaching resource.
• Teachers make the "first drafts" that TeacherMatic
produces. The teacher corrects, modifies to suit the
need. First draft can "save" teachers significant time and
effort.
• TeacherMatic produces, but it is still required that the
teacher checks and changes if necessary.
TeacherMatic doesn't know if anything is right!
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 21
There are over 20 features in TeacherMatic

20. Kontodetaljer
Logga in på https://teachermatic.com/
Användarnamn: teachermatictrial2@teachermatic.com
Lösenord: Hogwarts
Karolinska Institutet - ett medicinskt universitet 4 oktober 2023 22