1. The document discusses massive gravity and proposes that giving the graviton a small mass could potentially explain dark matter and dark energy without needing to introduce those concepts.
2. It reviews several models of massive gravity, including the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model, which produces cosmic acceleration similar to dark energy. Kaluza-Klein theory is also discussed as producing massive gravitons.
3. Nonlinear extensions of the Pauli-Fierz theory are examined, finding solutions only with singularities. The "Goldstone" description of massive gravity is introduced as a way to better understand nonlinear effects like the Vainshtein mechanism.
While most of the singularities of General Relativity are expected to be safely hidden behind event horizons by the cosmic censorship conjecture, we happen to live in the causal future of the classical big bang singularity, whose resolution constitutes the active field of early universe cosmology...
Motions for systems and structures in space, described by a set denoted Avd. ...Premier Publishers
In order to describe general motions and matter in space, functions for angular velocity and density are assumed and denoted Avd, as an abbreviation. The framework provides a unified approach to motions at different scales. It is analysed how Avd enters and rules, in terms of results from equations, in field experiments and observations at Earth. Chaos may organize according to Avd, such that more order, Cosmos, appear in complex nonlinear dynamical systems. This reveals that Avd may be governing and that deterministic systems can be created without assuming boundaries and conditions for initial values and forces from outside. A mathematical model for the initiation of Logos (when a paper accelerates into a narrow circular orbit), was described, and denoted local implosion; Li. The theorem for dl, provides discrete solutions to a power law, and this is related to locations of satellites and moons.
While most of the singularities of General Relativity are expected to be safely hidden behind event horizons by the cosmic censorship conjecture, we happen to live in the causal future of the classical big bang singularity, whose resolution constitutes the active field of early universe cosmology...
Motions for systems and structures in space, described by a set denoted Avd. ...Premier Publishers
In order to describe general motions and matter in space, functions for angular velocity and density are assumed and denoted Avd, as an abbreviation. The framework provides a unified approach to motions at different scales. It is analysed how Avd enters and rules, in terms of results from equations, in field experiments and observations at Earth. Chaos may organize according to Avd, such that more order, Cosmos, appear in complex nonlinear dynamical systems. This reveals that Avd may be governing and that deterministic systems can be created without assuming boundaries and conditions for initial values and forces from outside. A mathematical model for the initiation of Logos (when a paper accelerates into a narrow circular orbit), was described, and denoted local implosion; Li. The theorem for dl, provides discrete solutions to a power law, and this is related to locations of satellites and moons.
Dynamical Systems Methods in Early-Universe CosmologiesIkjyot Singh Kohli
Talk I gave at The Southern Ontario Numerical Analysis Day (SONAD): http://www.math.yorku.ca/sonad2014/ on General Relativity, Dynamical Systems, and Early-Universe Cosmologies.
In this paper we have tried to describe a gauge group for gravitational potential associated with the elementary particle as described by their spiral structure in accordance with the standard model. It relates to the framework of quantum field theory considering the Dark Potential Waves which constitutes the Universe to be destructively interfering through Symmetry which breaks spontaneously through autocatalysis to initiate the Higgs Mechanism which consecutively defines the gravitational potential resulting in various spiral forms of particles. It also redefines the formation of Spiral Structure of Elementary Particles in context to formation of Sea Shells.
Understanding the experimental and mathematical derivation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. Simple application for estimating single degree of freedom particle in a potential free environment is also discussed.
Dynamical Systems Methods in Early-Universe CosmologiesIkjyot Singh Kohli
Talk I gave at The Southern Ontario Numerical Analysis Day (SONAD): http://www.math.yorku.ca/sonad2014/ on General Relativity, Dynamical Systems, and Early-Universe Cosmologies.
In this paper we have tried to describe a gauge group for gravitational potential associated with the elementary particle as described by their spiral structure in accordance with the standard model. It relates to the framework of quantum field theory considering the Dark Potential Waves which constitutes the Universe to be destructively interfering through Symmetry which breaks spontaneously through autocatalysis to initiate the Higgs Mechanism which consecutively defines the gravitational potential resulting in various spiral forms of particles. It also redefines the formation of Spiral Structure of Elementary Particles in context to formation of Sea Shells.
Understanding the experimental and mathematical derivation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. Simple application for estimating single degree of freedom particle in a potential free environment is also discussed.
El 7 de noviembre de 2016, la Fundación Ramón Areces organizó el Simposio Internacional 'Solitón: un concepto con extraordinaria diversidad de aplicaciones inter, trans, y multidisciplinares. Desde el mundo macroscópico al nanoscópico'.
EMU M.Sc. Thesis Presentation
Thesis Title: "Dark Matter; Modification of f(R) or WIMPS Miracle"
Student: Ali Övgün
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Mustafa Halilsoy
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
20 Comprehensive Checklist of Designing and Developing a WebsitePixlogix Infotech
Dive into the world of Website Designing and Developing with Pixlogix! Looking to create a stunning online presence? Look no further! Our comprehensive checklist covers everything you need to know to craft a website that stands out. From user-friendly design to seamless functionality, we've got you covered. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource! Check out our checklist now at Pixlogix and start your journey towards a captivating online presence today.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...Zilliz
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
A short introduction to massive gravity... or ... Can one give a mass to the graviton?
1. SUPERJEDI
Pointe aux Piments
July, the 4th 2013
A short introduction
to « massive gravity » …
or …
Can one give a mass
to the graviton
1. The 3 sins of massive
gravity (or why it is hard ?)
2. Cures
(or why it may be possible ?)
(to be discussed later)
Cédric Deffayet
(APC, CNRS Paris)
2. Part 1. the 3 sins of massive gravity
1.1. Introduction: why « massive gravity » ?
and some properties of « massless gravity »
1.2. The DGP model (as an invitation to take the trip)
1.3. Kaluza-Klein gravitons
1.4. Quadratic massive gravity: the Pauli-Fierz theory and the vDVZ
discontinuity
1.5. Non linear Pauli-Fierz theory and the Vainshtein Mechanism
1.6 The Goldstone picture (and « decoupling limit ») of non linear
massive gravity, and what can one get from it ?
3. 1.1 Introduction: Why « massive gravity » ?
• Dark matter, to explain in
particular the dynamics of
galaxies.
• Dark energy (to explain in
particular the observed
acceleration of the expansion of
the Universe) … in a form close to
that of a cosmological constant
½ » constant
Friedmann (Einstein) equation
Standard model of cosmology
requires the presence in the
matter content of the Universe of
4. Why « massive gravity » ?
One way to modify gravity at « large distances »
… and get rid of dark energy (or dark matter) ?
Changing the dynamics
of gravity ?
Historical example the
success/failure of both
approaches: Le Verrier and
• The discovery of Neptune
• The non discovery of Vulcan…
but that of General Relativity
Dark matter
dark energy ?
5. for this idea to work…
One obviously needs
a very light graviton
(of Compton length
of order of the size of
the Universe)
I.e. to « replace » the cosmological constant by a
non vanishing graviton mass…
NB: It seems one of the
Einstein’s motivations to
introduce the cosmological
constant was to try to « give a
mass to the graviton »
(see « Einstein’s mistake and the
cosmological constant »
by A. Harvey and E. Schucking,
Am. J. of Phys. Vol. 68, Issue 8 (2000))
6. Some properties of « massless gravity »
(i.e. General Relativity – GR )
In GR, the field equations (Einstein equations) take
the same form in all coordinate system (« general
covariance »)
Einstein tensor:
Second order non
linear differential
operator on the
metric g¹ º
Energy momentum
tensor: describes the
sources
Newton
constant
The Einstein tensor obeys the identities
In agreement with the conservation relations
8. If one linearizes Einstein equations around e.g. a flat metric ´¹º
one obtains the field equations for a « graviton »
given by
Kinetic operator of the graviton h¹ º :
does not contain any mass term / (undifferentiated h¹ º)
The masslessness of the graviton is guaranteed by the gauge
invariance (general covariance)
Which also results in the graviton having 2 = (10 – 4 £ 2)
physical polarisations (cf. the « photon » A¹)
9. 1.2 The DGP model
(as an invitation to take the trip)
Peculiar to
DGP model
Usual 5D brane
world action
• Brane localized kinetic
term for the graviton
• Will generically be induced
by quantum corrections
A special hierarchy between
M(5) and MP is required
to make the model
phenomenologically interesting
Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati, 2000
Leads to the e.o.m.
10. Phenomenological interest
A new way to modify gravity at large distance, with a new type
of phenomenology … The first framework where cosmic
acceleration was proposed to be linked to a large distance
modification of gravity (C.D. 2001; C.D., Dvali, Gababadze 2002)
(Important to have such models, if only to disentangle what
does and does not depend on the large distance dynamics of
gravity in what we know about the Universe)
Theoretical interest
Consistent (?) non linear massive gravity …
DGP model
Intellectual interest
Lead to many subsequent developments (massive gravity,
Galileons, …)
11. Energy density of brane localized matter
Homogeneous cosmology of DGP model
One obtains the following modified Friedmann equations (C.D. 2001)
• Analogous to standard (4D) Friedmann equations
In the early Universe
(small Hubble radii )
• Deviations at late time (self-acceleration)
Two
branches of
solutions
Light cone
Brane
Cosmic time
Equal cosmic time
Big Bang
13. • Newtonian potential on the brane behaves as
4D behavior at small distances
5D behavior at large distances
• The crossover distance between the two regimes is given by
This enables to get a “4D looking” theory of gravity out of
one which is not, without having to assume a compact
(Kaluza-Klein) or “curved” (Randall-Sundrum) bulk.
• But the tensorial structure of the graviton propagator is that of a massive
graviton (gravity is mediated by a continuum of massive modes)
Leads to the « van Dam-Veltman-Zakharov discontinuity » on
Minkowski background (i.e. the fact that the linearized theory differs
drastically – e.g. in light bending - from linearized GR at all scales)!
In the DGP model :
the vDVZ discontinuity, is believed to disappear via the « Vainshtein
mechanism » (taking into account of non linearities) C.D.,Gabadadze, Dvali,
Vainshtein, Gruzinov; Porrati; Lue; Lue & Starkman; Tanaka; Gabadadze, Iglesias;…
14. Many (open) questions about DGP model…
… but for the purpose of this talk,
just take it as an example of a
theory with some flavour of
« massive gravity »…
… and extra space dimensions.
15. 1.3. Kaluza-Klein gravitons
Massive gravitons (from the standpoint of a 4D observer) are
ubiquitous in models with extra space-time dimensions in the
form of « Kaluza-Klein » modes.
Consider first a massless scalar-mediated force in 4D.
E = - /0
N = 4 GN m
It is obtained from the Poisson equation
(e.g. for an electrostatic or a gravitationnal potential)
Yielding a force between two bodies / 1/r2
18. Inserting this into the 5D massless field equation:
with mk = R
k
Field equation for a 4D scalar
field of mass mk
A 5D massless scalar appears as a
collection of 4D massive scalars
(Tower of “Kaluza-Klein” modes):
m0 = 0
m1 = R
1
m2 = R
2
m3 = R
3
m4 = R
4
Experiments at energies much below m1
only see the massless mode
Low energy effective theory is four-
dimensional
m
2
k k
19. The same reasoning holds for the graviton:
with g (x,y) = + h (x,y)
Metric describing the
4+1D space-time
Flat metric describing
the reference cylinder
Small perturbation in the
vicinity of a reference
“cylinder” :
Decomposed in terms of a
Fourier serie :
² One massless
graviton
² A tower of massive
“Kaluza-Klein” graviton
Can one consider consistently a single
massive graviton ?
20.
21.
22.
23. N.B., the PF mass term reads
h00 enters linearly both in the kinetic
part and the mass term, and is thus a
Lagrange multiplier of the theory…
… which equation of motion enables to eliminate
one of the a priori 6 dynamical d.o.f. hij
By contrast the h0i are not Lagrange multipliers
5 propagating d.o.f. in the quadratic PF
h is transverse traceless in vacuum.
[cf. a massive photon (Proca field), which has 3
polarisation, vs a massless photon, which has 2]
24. 1.5 Non linear Pauli-Fierz theory and the Vainshtein Mechanism
Can be defined by an action of the form
The interaction term is chosen such that
• It is invariant under diffeomorphisms
• It has flat space-time as a vacuum
• When expanded around a flat metric
(g = + h , f = )
It gives the Pauli-Fierz mass term
Einstein-Hilbert action
for the g metric
Matter action (coupled
to metric g)
Interaction term coupling
the metric g and the non
dynamical metric f
Matter energy-momentum tensor
Leads to the e.o.m. M2
P G¹º =
¡
T¹º + Tg
¹º(f; g)
¢
Effective energy-momentum
tensor ( f,g dependent)
Isham, Salam, Strathdee, 1971
25. Some working examples
Look for static spherically symmetric solutions
with
H¹º = g¹º ¡ f¹º
(infinite number of models with similar properties)
Boulware Deser, 1972, BD in the following
Arkani-Hamed, Georgi, Schwarz, 2003
AGS in the following
(Damour, Kogan, 2003)
S
(2)
int = ¡
1
8
m2
M2
P
Z
d4
x
p
¡f H¹ºH¾¿ (f¹¾
fº¿
¡ f¹º
f¾¿
)
S
(3)
int = ¡
1
8
m2
M2
P
Z
d4
x
p
¡g H¹ºH¾¿ (g¹¾
gº¿
¡ g¹º
g¾¿
)
26. With the ansatz (not the most general one !)
gABdxA
dxB
= ¡J(r)dt2
+ K(r)dr2
+ L(r)r2
d-2
fABdxA
dxB
= ¡dt2
+ dr2
+ r2
d-2
Gauge transformation
g¹ºdx¹
dxº
= ¡eº(R)
dt2
+ e¸(R)
dR2
+ R2
d-2
f¹ºdx¹
dxº
= ¡dt2
+
µ
1 ¡
R¹0
(R)
2
¶2
e¡¹(R)
dR2
+ e¡¹(R)
R2
d-2
Then look for an expansion in
GN (or in RS / GN M) of the would be solution
Interest: in this form the g metric can easily be
compared to standard Schwarzschild form
27. This coefficient equals +1
in Schwarzschild solution
Wrong light bending!
Vainshtein 1972
In « some kind »
[Damour et al. 2003]
of non linear PF
…
…
O(1) ²
O(1) ²
Introduces a new length scale R in the problem
below which the perturbation theory diverges!
V
with Rv = (RSmà 4
)1=5
For the sun: bigger than solar system!
28. So, what is going on at smaller distances?
Vainshtein’72
There exists an other perturbative expansion at smaller distances,
defined around (ordinary) Schwarzschild and reading:
with
• This goes smoothly toward Schwarzschild as m goes to zero
• This leads to corrections to Schwarzschild which are non
analytic in the Newton constant
¸(R) = +RS
R
n
1 + O
³
R5=2
=R
5=2
v
´o
º(R) = ¡RS
R
n
1 + O
³
R5=2
=R
5=2
v
´o
R
¡5=2
v = m2
R
¡1=2
S
29. To summarize: 2 regimes
÷(R) = à R
RS
(1 + 32
7
ï + ::: with ï = m4R5
RS
Valid for R À Rv with Rv = (RSmà 4
)1=5
Valid for R ¿ Rv
Expansion around
Schwarzschild
solution
Crucial question: can one join the two
regimes in a single existing non singular
(asymptotically flat) solution? (Boulware Deser 72)
Standard
perturbation theory
around flat space
30. This was investigated (by numerical integration) by
Damour, Kogan and Papazoglou (2003)
No non-singular solution found
matching the two behaviours (always
singularities appearing at finite radius)
(see also Jun, Kang 1986)
In the 2nd part of this talk:
A new look on this problem using in
particular the « Goldstone picture » of
massive gravity in the « Decoupling limit. »
(in collaboration with E. Babichev and R.Ziour
2009-2010)
31. 1.6 The Goldstone picture (and « decoupling limit »)
of non linear massive gravity,
and what can one get from it ?
Originally proposed in the analysis of Arkani-Hamed,
Georgi and Schwartz using « Stückelberg » fields …
and leads to the cubic action in the scalar sector
(helicity 0) of the model
Other cubic terms omitted
With = (m4 MP)1/5
« Strong coupling scale »
(hidden cutoff of the model ?)
32. Analogous to the Stuckelberg « trick » used to introduce
gauge invariance into the Proca Lagrangian
(action for a massive photon)
F¹ºF¹º
+ m2
A¹A¹
Unitary gauge
The obtained theory has the gauge invariance
A¹ ! A¹ + @¹®
Á ! Á ¡ ®
A¹ ! A¹ + @¹ÁDo then the replacement
with the new field Á
The Proca action is just the same theory
written in the gauge, while gets a kinetic term
via the Proca mass term ( )
Á = 0 Á
m2
A¹A¹
! m2
@¹Á@¹
Á
g
f
33. Do the same for non linear massive gravity
The theory considered has the usual diffeo invariance
g¹º(x) = @¹x0¾
(x)@ºx0¿
(x)g0
¾¿ (x0
(x))
f¹º(x) = @¹x0¾
(x)@ºx0¿
(x)f0
¾¿ (x0
(x))
This can be used to go from a « unitary gauge » where
fAB = ´AB
To a « non unitary gauge » where some of the d.o.f.
of the g metric are put into f thanks to a gauge
transformation of the form
f¹º(x) = @¹XA
(x)@ºXB
(x)´AB (X(x))
g¹º(x) = @¹XA
(x)@ºXB
(x)gAB (X(x))
g¹º(x)x
¹
´AB
X
A
f¹º(x)
XA
(x)
A
Á
35. Expand the theory around the unitary gauge as
XA
(x) = ±A
¹ x¹
+ ¼A
(x)
¼A
(x) = ±A
¹ (A¹
(x) + ´¹º
@ºÁ) :
Unitary gauge
coordinates
« pion » fields
The interaction term expanded
at quadratic order in the new fields A and reads
A gets a kinetic term via the mass term
only gets one via a mixing term
M2
P m2
8
Z
d4
x
£
h2
¡ h¹ºh¹º
¡ F¹ºF¹º
¡4(h@A ¡ h¹º@¹
Aº
) ¡ 4(h@¹
@¹Á ¡ h¹º@¹
@º
Á)]
36. One can demix from h by defining
h¹º = ^h¹º ¡ m2
´¹ºÁ
And the interaction term reads then at quadratic order
S =
M2
P m2
8
Z
d4
x
n
^h2
¡ ^h¹º
^h¹º
¡ F¹ºF¹º
¡ 4(^h@A ¡ ^h¹º@¹
Aº
)
+6m2
h
Á(@¹@¹
+ 2m2
)Á ¡ ^hÁ + 2Á@A
io
The canonically normalized is given by ~Á = MP m2
Á
Taking then the
« Decoupling Limit »
One is left with …
MP ! 1
m ! 0
¤ = (m4
MP )1=5
» const
T¹º=MP » const;
37. With = (m4 MP)1/5
E.g. around a heavy source: of mass M
+ + ….
Interaction M/M of
the external source
with þà
P The cubic interaction above generates
O(1) coorrection at R = Rv ñ (RSmà 4
)1=5
In the decoupling limit, the Vainshtein radius is kept fixed, and
one can understand the Vainshtein mechanism as
® ( ~Á)3
+ ¯ ( ~Á ~Á;¹º
~Á;¹º
)
and ® and ¯ model dependent coefficients
« Strong coupling scale »
(hidden cutoff of the model ?)
38. An other non trivial property of non-linear Pauli-Fierz: at non
linear level, it propagates 6 instead of 5 degrees of freedom,
the energy of the sixth d.o.f. having no lower bound!
Using the usual ADM decomposition of the metric, the
non-linear PF Lagrangian reads (for flat)
With Neither Ni , nor N are
Lagrange multipliers
6 propagating d.o.f., corresponding to the gij
The e.o.m. of Ni and N determine those as
functions of the other variables
Boulware, Deser ‘72
39. Moreover, the reduced Lagrangian for
those propagating d.o.f. read
) Unbounded from below Hamiltonian
Boulware, Deser 1972
This can be understood in the « Goldstone » description
C.D., Rombouts 2005
(See also Creminelli, Nicolis, Papucci, Trincherini 2005)
Indeed the action for the scalar polarization
Leads to order 4 E.O.M. ), it describes two
scalars fields, one being ghost-like
40. Summary of the first part: the 3 sins of massive gravity
They can all be seen at the Decoupling Limit level
• 1. vDVZ discontinuity
Cured by the Vainshtein mechanism ?
• 2. Boulware Deser ghost
Can one get rid of it ?
• 3. Low Strong Coupling scale
Can one have a higher cutoff ?