Binary pulsars provide an excellent tool to test theories of gravity. The document describes several binary pulsar systems and how measurements of their orbital parameters over time have allowed for high-precision tests of general relativity in strong gravitational fields. Specifically, the double pulsar system PSR J0737-3039A/B has enabled measurements that agree with general relativity predictions to within 0.05% precision by measuring parameters like periastron advance and gravitational redshift effects.
6. The Pulsar Population
The P-P diagram
Fundamental parameters:
• Spin period
• Spin period derivative
Credit: Kramer and Stairs (2008)
Friday 02 August 2013
7. The Binary Pulsar Population
Binary pulsars are “special”
According to the ATNF
catalogue:
• 2008 pulsars
• 186 binary pulsars
Credit: Kramer and Stairs (2008)
Binaries:
• Short spin periods
• Old
• Low magnetic fields
Friday 02 August 2013
8. The Binary Pulsar Population
Binary pulsars are “special”
According to the ATNF
catalogue:
• 2008 pulsars
• 186 binary pulsars
Credit: Kramer and Stairs (2008)
Binaries:
• Short spin periods
• Old
• Low magnetic fields
Friday 02 August 2013
11. Newtonian orbits
Timing binary pulsars allows one to determine 5 Keplerian parameters:
• Orbital period
• Eccentricity
• Longitude of periastron
• Projected semimajor axis
• Epoch of periastron
Arpad Horvath (Wikipedia)
We measure radial Doppler shifts only…
=> The orbital inclination angle is unknown.
Binary Pulsar Timing
Friday 02 August 2013
12. Post-Keplerian (PK) parameters: dynamics beyond Newton.
• PKs are phenomenological corrections (theory-independent).
• PKs are functions of Keplerian parameters, M1 and M2.
Esposito-Farese (2004)
Binary Pulsar Timing
Relativistic orbits
More than 2 PKs = test of a given relativistic theory of gravity.
Friday 02 August 2013
13. • Testing gravity relies on orbital dynamics
• Ideally: pulsar + neutron star
eccentric + compact orbit
• About 12 known “relativistic” pulsar binaries
Binary Pulsar Timing
Relativistic orbits4 Weisberg & Taylor
Figure 1. Orbital decay of PSR B1913+16. The data points indicate
the observed change in the epoch of periastron with date while the
parabola illustrates the theoretically expected change in epoch for a
system emitting gravitational radiation, according to general relativity.
PSR B1913+16
• First binary pulsar discovered
(Hulse & Taylor 1975)
• First indirect evidence of gravitational wave
emission (Taylor et al. 1979)
Weisberg & Taylor (2005)
Friday 02 August 2013
15. Periastron advance
Rate of precession of the
periastron: 17°yr-1 !
It takes 21 years to complete a cycle
of precession.
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
16. Periastron advance
Rate of precession of the
periastron: 17°yr-1 !
It takes 21 years to complete a cycle
of precession.
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
17. Gravitational redshift and time dilation
Needs to climb to potential well
Clocks tick at variable rate in
gravitational potentials
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
18. Gravitational redshift and time dilation
Needs to climb to potential well
Clocks tick at variable rate in
gravitational potentials
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
19. Orbital period decay
Gravitational wave emission
Orbit shrinks 7mm/day (coalescence
timescale ~ 85 Myrs)
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
20. Orbital period decay
Gravitational wave emission
Orbit shrinks 7mm/day (coalescence
timescale ~ 85 Myrs)
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
21. Orbital period decay
Gravitational wave emission
Orbit shrinks 7mm/day (coalescence
timescale ~ 85 Myrs)
Kramer et al., 2006
Double neutron star merger as seen by a theoretician
A
B
BH
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Friday 02 August 2013
22. Shapiro delay
Light travels in curved space-time
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
23. Shapiro delay
Light travels in curved space-time
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
24. Shapiro delay
Light travels in curved spacetime
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
25. Mass ratio
Double Pulsar only:
mass ratio, R.
MA/MB = aBsin(i) / aAsin(i)
(theory-independent; at 1PN level at least)
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
26. Mass ratio
Double Pulsar only:
mass ratio, R.
MA/MB = aBsin(i) / aAsin(i)
(theory-independent; at 1PN level at least)
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
27. Testing GR and gravity
Mass ratio + 5 PK parameters
=> Yields 6-2=4 gravity tests
Best binary pulsar test
Shapiro delay “s” parameter
Agrees with GR within 0.05%
(Kramer et al. 2006)
Hulse-Taylor pulsar is 0.2%
The Double Pulsar
Testing gravity
Kramer et al., 2006
Friday 02 August 2013
28. Precession of the spin angular momentum of a body is expected in relativistic systems.
Parallel transport in a curve space-time changes the orientation of a vector relative to distant
observers.
Known as “geodetic precession” or “de Sitter – Fokker precession”.
Relativistic Spin Precession
Spin-orbit coupling induces relativistic spin precession
Friday 02 August 2013
29. Ωobs = 0.44
+0.48(4.6)
−0.16(0.24)
◦
/yr
Changes of pulse shape and polarization over time.
PSR B1913+16 (Kramer 1998, Weisberg & Taylor 2002, Clifton &
Weisberg 2008):
• Assume the predicted GR rate to map the beam
PSR B1534+12 (Stairs et al. 2004):
•
Relativistic Spin Precession
Observational evidence of precession
GEOMETRY OF PSR B1913]16 857
FIG. 1.ÈPulse proÐle of B1913]16 observed in 1995 April
At Ðrst, we measured the amplitude ratio of the leading
and trailing components using the o†-pulse rms as an
uncertainty estimator. These are presented in Figure 2,
where we also plot data from It is seen that the newWRT.
data are in good agreement with the earlier measured trend.
Performing a weighted least-squares Ðt, we obtained a ratio
change of [1.9% ^ 0.1% per year. It is interesting to note
that our Ðt is also in agreement with the component ratio
from 1978 March which was measured using the(Fig. 2),
proÐle published by & Weisberg The ampli-Taylor (1982).
tude ratio between proÐle midpoint and trailing component
seems to remain constant at a value of about 0.17 over a
time span of 20 yr within the errors.
Measuring the separation between the leading and trail-
ing components, we followed the approach of byWRT
Ðtting Gaussian curves to the central portion of each com-
ponent. The formal accuracy determined by the Ðt error can
be up to an order of magnitude better than the sampling
time, similar to a standard template matching procedure.
We note, however, that the components are asymmetric in
shape, so that the resulting centroids might be a†ected by
FIG. 2.ÈAmplitude ratio of leading and trailing components as a func-
tion of time. Filled circles were adapted from while open circlesWRT,
represent E†elsberg measurements. The dashed line represents a linear Ðt
FIG. 3.È
Closed circ
surements p
listed in Tab
the consiste
details).
the numb
In order t
tainty, we
to intensi
respective
and their
with valu
approach
1981 proÐ
levels. W
agreemen
consisten
In wha
general re
the uncer
beam exh
with inte
The Ðrst
excellent
prediction
Wh1989).
magnetic
change, t
ΩGR = 0.51◦
/yr
Kramer 1998
Friday 02 August 2013
30. Pulsar A eclipsed by pulsar B for ~30 seconds at conjunction
Rapid flux changes synchronized with pulsar B’s rotation (McLaughlin et al. 2004)
A
B
Time of arrival of
B’s pulse
Double Pulsar Eclipses
Phenomenology
Breton et al. 2008
Friday 02 August 2013
31. Double Pulsar Eclipses
Modeling using synchrotron absorption in a truncated dipole
The “doughnut model” (Lyutikov & Thompson 2006)
Friday 02 August 2013
32. Double Pulsar Eclipses
Modeling using synchrotron absorption in a truncated dipole
The “doughnut model” (Lyutikov & Thompson 2006)
Friday 02 August 2013
35. Empirical evidence of dipolar magnetic field geometry.
Eclipses are a proxy to infer the orientation of pulsar B.
Double Pulsar Eclipses
It works!
Breton et al. 2008
A
B
Friday 02 August 2013
36. Quantitative measurement of relativistic spin precession.
Testing General Relativity in a Strong Field
General relativity passes the test once again!
Breton et al. 2008
Friday 02 August 2013
37. Quantitative measurement of relativistic spin precession.
Testing General Relativity in a Strong Field
General relativity passes the test once again!
Breton et al. 2008
Friday 02 August 2013
38. Pulsar B disappeared in 2009... so no more “Double Pulsar”
Testing General Relativity in a Strong Field
By the way...
Friday 02 August 2013
39. Pulsar B disappeared in 2009... so no more “Double Pulsar”
Testing General Relativity in a Strong Field
By the way...
2024
Friday 02 August 2013
41. “Strong-field” regime:
• Still > 250 000 RSchwarzchild in separation but…
• Ebinding ~ 15% Etot
Esposito-Farese (2004)
Strong-field regime
Why are tests of gravity involving pulsars interesting?
Friday 02 August 2013
42. Generalized precession rate is (Damour & Taylor, 1992, Phys. Rev. D):
In terms of a very particular choice of observable timing parameters:
Theory-Independent Test of Gravity
Unique test... for a unique double pulsar...
Friday 02 August 2013
43. Generalized precession rate is (Damour & Taylor, 1992, Phys. Rev. D):
In terms of a very particular choice of observable timing parameters:
Test of the strong-field parameters .
Any other mixture of timing observables would
include additional strong-field parameters.
Theory-Independent Test of Gravity
Unique test... for a unique double pulsar...
Friday 02 August 2013
44. Generalized precession rate is (Damour & Taylor, 1992, Phys. Rev. D):
In terms of a very particular choice of observable timing parameters:
Test of the strong-field parameters .
Any other mixture of timing observables would
include additional strong-field parameters.
The Double Pulsar is the only double neutron star system in which both semi-
major axes can be measured independently!
Theory-Independent Test of Gravity
Unique test... for a unique double pulsar...
Friday 02 August 2013
45. Mass ratio from pulsar timing + white dwarf spectroscopy
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
The pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J1738+0333
10 Freire, Wex, Esposito-Far`ese, Verbiest et al.
mc
Pb
.
Pb
.
mc
qq
Figure 5. Constraints on system masses and orbital inclination from radio and optical measurements of PSR J1738+0333 and its WD
companion. The mass ratio q and the companion mass mc are theory-independent (indicated in black), but the constraints from the
measured intrinsic orbital decay ( ˙P Int
b , in orange) are calculated assuming that GR is the correct theory of gravity. All curves intersect,
meaning that GR passes this important test. Left: cos i–mc plane. The gray region is excluded by the condition mp > 0. Right: mp–mc
Freire et al. (2012) & Antoniadis et al. (2012)
White dwarf mass from photometry + spectroscopy
Orbital period decay from pulsar timing
Freire et al. (2012) & Antoniadis et al. (2012)
Friday 02 August 2013
46. ˙Pxs
b = ˙P
˙M
b + ˙PT
b + ˙PD
b + ˙P
˙G
b
˙PD
b −2π nbT⊙mc
q
q + 1
κD(spsr − scomp)2
spsr,comp /Mpsr,compc2
The “excess” orbital period decay:
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
Constraining dipolar gravitational waves
mass loss tides dipolar gravitational
waves
variation of
gravitational constant
where
Friday 02 August 2013
47. ˙Pxs
b = ˙P
˙M
b + ˙PT
b + ˙PD
b + ˙P
˙G
b
˙PD
b −2π nbT⊙mc
q
q + 1
κD(spsr − scomp)2
spsr,comp /Mpsr,compc2
The “excess” orbital period decay:
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
Constraining dipolar gravitational waves
mass loss tides dipolar gravitational
waves
variation of
gravitational constant
spsr = scomp
Neutron star + white dwarf binaries
have very different self-gravity
where
Friday 02 August 2013
48. ˙PD
b
˙P
˙G
b
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
Constraining dipolar gravitational waves
The most stringe
Figure 6. Limits on ˙G/G and κD derived from the measurements
of ˙P xs
b of PSR J1738+0333 and PSR J0437−4715. The inner blue
contour level includes 68.3% and the outer contour level 95.4%
seem particu
in the comp
system make
alternative g
the emission
5 and 6, we
classes of gra
more generic
perturbative
contribution
of the bodies
does not car
ple, the well
theory falls i
Under t
change in th
radiation dam
˙PD
b −2π n
are degenerateand
Combining data from PSRs J1738+0333 and J0437-4715 breaks the degeneracy
Freire et al. (2012) and, also, Lazaridis et al. (2009)
Lunar Laser Ranging
Friday 02 August 2013
49. ln A(ϕ) − ln A(ϕ0) = α0(ϕ − ϕ0) +
1
2
β0(ϕ − ϕ0)2
˜GAB ≡ G∗A2
(ϕ0) · (1 + αAαB)
γAB ≡ 1 − 2
αAαB
1 + αAαB
βA
BC ≡ 1 +
1
2
βAαBαC
(1 + αAαB)(1 + αAαC)
˜gµν ≡ A2
(ϕ)gµν
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
Constraining tensor-scalar theories
Freire et al. (2012)
Associated metric
A general tensor scalar field
Modify the behavior of gravitational constant
And the Eddington’s PPN parameters
t al.
e
a-
D
t
s-
s
r-
r
×
n
)
).
r
)
t
l.
t
e
n-
n
s
a
LLR
LLR
SEP
J1141–6545
B1534+12
B1913+16
J0737–3039
J1738+0333
−6 −4 −2 2 4 6
0
0
0
0|
10
10
10
10
10
Cassini
Figure 7. Solar-system and binary pulsar 1-σ constraints on the
matter-scalar coupling constants α0 and β0. Note that a log-
arithmic scale is used for the vertical axis |α0|, i.e., that GR
(α0 = β0 = 0) is sent at an infinite distance down this axis.
LLR stands for lunar laser ranging, Cassini for the measure-
ment of a Shapiro time-delay variation in the Solar System, and
GR
Friday 02 August 2013
50. βA
BC ≡ 1 +
1
2
βAαBαC
(1 + αAαB)(1 + αAαC)
˜g00 = A2
(ϕ)g00 ˜gij = A−2
(ϕ)gij
˜GAB = G∗(1 + αAαB)
γAB = γPPN
= 1
Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
Constraining modified newtonian dynamics
Freire et al. (2012)
Associated metric
MOND is the non-relativistic limit of tensor-vector-scalar (TeVeS) theories
Modify the behavior of gravitational constant
And the Eddington’s PPN parameters
GR
t al.
e
a
-
s
n
,
i
0
s
5
n
w
r
e
n
σ
s
-
-
)
V
-
h
r
,
t
LLR
SEP
J1141–6545
B1534+12
B1913+16
J0737–3039
J1738+0333
10
−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6
0
0|
100
Tuned
TeVeS
Inconsistent
TeVeS
10
10
10
Figure 8. Similar theory plane as in Fig. 7, but now for the (non-
conformal) matter-scalar coupling described in the text, general-
izing the TeVeS model. Above the upper horizontal dashed line,
the nonlinear kinetic term of the scalar field may be a natural
function; between the two dashed lines, this function needs to
be tuned; and below the lower dashed line, it cannot exist any
and
Friday 02 August 2013
51. Dipolar Gravitational Waves and MOND
The pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J1738+0333
Antoniadis et al. (2013)
Antoniadis et al. (2013)
MWD MWD
P
.
b
P
.
b qq
New system discovered that provides even better constraints.
Might rule out MOND within the next few years.
Friday 02 August 2013
52. |ˆα3| 5.5 × 10−20
|∆| 4.6 × 10−3
P2
orb/e2
P2
orb/(eP) P
1/3
orb /e
Pulsar + WD in low eccentricity wide orbit
Test strong equivalence principle
Test violation of momentum conservation and preferred frame-effects
More Tests of Gravity?
SEP violation, preferred-frame effects
statistical: see, e.g., Gonzalez et al. 2011, Stairs et al. 2005
individual system: see, e.g., Wex Kramer 2007
Friday 02 August 2013
53. Neutron Star Equation-of-State
Probing the upper mass limit of neutron stars
PSR B1957+20
PSR J1614-2230
Lattimer 2007
van Kerkwijk, Breton
Kulkarni (2011)
Demorest et al. (2010)
Friday 02 August 2013
54. The Future Is Bright
More pulsars, more photons
More pulsars: What if we know “all” pulsars from the Galaxy?
More binaries = many new oddballs
Not clear how this translates for gravity tests
More photons:
Accurate parallax for large number of pulsars
Improved timing on existing systems
Friday 02 August 2013
55. Conclusions
Eccentricity
OrbitalPeriod
PSR + NS
PSR + WD
spin-orbit coupling
dipolar GW
tensor-scalar
TeVeS/MOND
NS EoS
SEP
preferred-frame effects
(individual)
preferred-frame effects
(statistical)
variation of G
consistencies of theories
relativistic effects
Binary pulsars
• Excellent tools to test gravity
• Probe a different gravitational field regime
• System diversity = complementarity
PSR + BD*
Friday 02 August 2013