On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
A Report On Spot Speed Study Course No CE 454 Course Title Transportation Engineering Sessional II
1. A Report
on
Spot Speed Study
Course No: CE 454
Course Title: Transportation Engineering Sessional II
Submitted by
Shuvro Kumar Chakravorty
Student ID: 1204009
Level/Term:4/2
Section: A
Date: 11 April,2017
Submitted to
Dr. Md. Shamsul Hoque
Professor
Department Of Civil Engineering,BUET
Sanjana Hossain
Assistant Professor
Department Of Civil Engineering
Department Of Civil Engineering
Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology
2. ABSTRACT
From the definition of transportation planning we find that “Transportation planning is
the field involved with transportation facilities (generally streets, highways, sidewalks,
bike lanes and public transport lines).” Traffic Volume is increasing day by day and this is
why proper transportation planning has become very necessary nowadays. Spot Speed
Study is one of the important and basic steps of transportation planning.
The current work studies traffic characteristics in the city of Dhaka at one selected
priority junction. In this work emphasis was given on traffic volume and the analysis was
carried out through primary traffic flow surveys at Panthapath to Russel Square in
Dhaka city. Spot Speed study was conducted by manual strip method.
With the help of the data collection, an attempt had been made to calculate average
speed, draw histogram showing the relation between vehicle numbers and speed range,
plot frequency curve and cumulative frequency curve to determine different speed
parameters like modal speed, pace, design speed. Traffic control at that junction is also
dependent on the traffic flow characteristics. Hence the results from the present study
are helpful in controlling the traffic at the intersection and also in suggesting some of
the remedial measures to improve the traffic safety in the region. Remedial measures
such as widening the road or by controlling non-motorized vehicle can be recommended
based on the outcomes of the work. Some of the interesting future study scopes are
also mentioned based on the outcomes of the work.
I
3. TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT......................................................................................................... I
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................ II
LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................. IV
LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................... V
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... 1
1.1 General.................................................................................................. 1
1.2 General Objectives of Speed study .......................................... 1
1.3 Scopes of Traffic Speed Study..................................................... 1
2. LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................... 3
2.1 General.................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Traffic Speed Study.......................................................................... 3
2.3 Past Studies......................................................................................... 3
2.4 Definition of Speed.......................................................................... 4
3 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 6
3.1 General.................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Manual Method ................................................................................ 6
3.2.a. Pavement markings.......................................................................... 6
3.2. b. Enoscope or Mirror box.......................................................... 7
3.3 Automatic Method .......................................................................... 7
3.3. a. Road Detector (Pressure contact strips).......................... 8
3.3. b. Doppler-Principle Meters (Radar)...................................... 8
3.3. c. Electronic-Principle Detectors (Photography)............... 9
3.4. The Method we followed............................................................ 10
4. Data Collection............................................................................................. 11
II
4. 4.1 Date and time.......................................................................................... 11
4.2 Weather Condition................................................................................. 11
4.3 Location .................................................................................................... 11
4.4 Observation......................................................................................... 12
4.5 Method and Equipment ................................................................ 12
4.6 Number of Enumerators ............................................................... 12
4.7 Data Collection Table ............................................................................. 13
5. DATA ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 16
5.1 Speed Calculation............................................................................. 16
5.2 Weighted Average Speed Calculation..................................... 29
5.4 Histogram,Frequency and Cumulative Frequency Curve................ 30
5.4 Discussion on spot speed.............................................................. 32
6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................ 33
6.1 General................................................................................................. 33
6.2 Results from Data Analysis in tabular form.......................... 33
6.3 Limitation............................................................................................. 33
6.4 Recommendations........................................................................... 33
6.5 Scope for Further Study................................................................. 34
References......................................................................................... 35
III
5. LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Recommended Study length for various average stream speed…………………………6
Table 4.1 : Travel time in 44 feet distance by car................................................... ..........................13
Table 4.2: Travel time in 44 feet distance by Micro bus …………………………............ ..........................13
Table 4.3: Travel time in 44 feet distance by CNG ………………………… ……………………………….. 14
Table 4.4: Travel time in 44 feet distance by Motorcycle……………………………………………………………14
Table 4.5 : Travel time in 44 feet distance by Pick-up …………………………................ ..........................15
Table 4.6: Travel time in 44 feet distance by Bus …………………………. ....................... ..........................15
Table 4.7 : Travel time in 44 feet distance by Jip/Pajero …………………………........... ..........................15
Table 5.1: Speed Calculation of different vehicles …………………………. ................... ..........................28
Table 5.2: Average speed and time of different vehicles …………………………....... ..........................29
IV
6. LIST OF FIGURES
Fig 3.1: Pavement marking …………………………………………………………………………………………………......7
Figure 3.2: Enoscope Method ……………………………………………………………………….............................7
Fig 3.3: Pneumatic road tube method ………………………………………………………………………............8
Fig 3.4 : Radar Gun image ……………………………………………………………………….........................................9
Fig 3.5 : Photography method ………………………………………………………………………..................................9
Fig 4.1: Panthapath Intersection to Russel Square Intersection………………………………........11
Fig 5.1 : Histogram showing No. of vehicles and speed range ……………………30
Fig 5.2 : % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph ………….………………………………….............. ..31
Fig 5.3: Cumulative % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph ………………………………………………..32
v
7.
8. Page 1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 General:
Speed is the ratio of total distance traveled divided by the total time taken to traverse
that distance. Speeds vary with the type of road and traffic volume. It is higher along freeways
and highways and lower along collector and local streets. Speed is affected by factors such as
lane width and sight distance. Speed decreases with an increase in traffic volumes. Traffic
volume is defined as the number of vehicles that pass a point along a roadway or traffic lane
per unit time.
1.2 General Objectives of Speed study:
There are several specific objectives of traffic speed studies and are listed below:
To measure the spot speed and travel speed of vehicles and note other related traffic
characteristics.
To present detailed diagram of spot speed and travel speed calculations.
To calculate spot speeds and prepare tables for statistical analysis of spot speeds
To plot histograms, frequency curves and cumulative frequency curves of spot speeds.
To determine weighted average speed, pace, modal speed, speed limit (85th percentile
speed), design speed, etc. of spot speeds.
To find Time-Mean-Speed (TMS) and Space-Mean-Speed (SMS) using the travel speed
and compare SMS and TMS.
To determine various parameters by using these speeds and also to prove some
relationships.
To draw Speed(Space-Mean)-flow curve based on observed data.
Superimpose typical speed-flow relationship diagram (qualitative)
To find LOS of the studied road
1.3 Scopes of Traffic Speed Study:
Speed study has a huge significance in transportation engineering in both designing and
management of traffic system.
Scopes of Spot speed study:
Spot speed study is Used for:
To establish speed zones
9. Page 2
To determine whether complaints about speeding are valid
To establish passing and no-passing zones
To design geometric alignment
To analyze accident data
Specific design applications (like sight distance, breaking distance, passing distance etc.)
Specific control applications (yellow/all red timing – the size of dilemma zone depends
on speed)
To evaluate the effects of physical improvements, etc
10. Page 3
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 General:
Traffic engineers and planners need information about traffic. They need information to design
and manage road and traffic system. To design a roadway there are specific road elements that
must be determined. Some of these are the number of lanes, lane width, median type and
width, length of acceleration and deceleration lanes for on and off ramps, need for truck
climbing lanes for roadways with steep grades, curve radii required for vehicle turning, and the
roadway alignment required to provide adequate stopping and passing sight distance
(Mannering and Kilareski 1998).
2.2 Traffic Speed Study:
Traffic speed data are needed in research, planning, designing and regulation phases of traffic
engineering and are also used in establishing priorities and schedules of traffic
improvements. The traffic engineer must acquire general knowledge of traffic speeds in order
to set different limits, setting different distances i.e. passing sight distance, stopping sight
distance etc.
2.3 Past Studies:
In the recent past, researchers have tested a wide array of technologies in an attempt to find
improved methods of monitoring traffic conditions. This research in traffic surveillance has
ranged from studies of traditional loop detection methods to the use of anti-submarine warfare
technology. AVI comprises one of but many of the areas of current research. A brief survey of
technologies explored during the past decade and a half is given below to provide an
understanding of the level of research interest in traffic surveillance technologies.
Bohnke and Pfannerstill acknowledged a need for more reliable traffic data acquisition than
localized data collection generated by traditional loop detectors (1986). The pair introduced a
pattern recognition algorithm which could utilize unique vehicle presence signatures generated
by successive series of inductance loop detectors.
Ju and Maze performed simulations on incident detection strategies using the FREQ8PE
simulation model (1989). Their research evaluated a comparison of incident detection
strategies using police patrol versus the use of motorist call boxes at 1 km spacing. The motorist
call boxes formed the backbone of the modeled freeway surveillance and control system (FSCS).
This FSCS yielded a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.69 as it generated benefits from travel-time
reduction and reduced fuel consumption. These benefits were brought about by reduced
incident detection time afforded by the motorist call boxes.
Prior to the installation of an AVI system in Houston, a cellular phone demonstration project
11. Page 4
was performed (Levine and McCasland, 1994). Researchers recruited 200 volunteers to
participate in the program, which required them to call a traffic information office when they
passed specific freeway locations during their morning and evening commutes. The lessons
learned from the cell phone project aided in the development of the data analysis, processing
and dissemination techniques used for the AVI system that was later constructed. In a similar
scenario, prior to installing a large-scale AVI system in the Puget Sound area, a small-scale test
of AVI was performed (Butterfield et. al., 1994). In this test, AVI was “piggy-backed” with
existing loop detectors. Results yielded an AVI detection rate of about 80% for a fleet of tag-
equipped buses.
In this brief survey, more than ten distinct traffic surveillance technologies have been identified
as the subject of research efforts since 1986. The amount of attention given to the research
field of traffic surveillance clearly suggests that a surveillance system that can provide reliable
and accurate travel time data would have great potential.
2.4 Definition of Speed:
In simple words, speed is defined as the distance travelled in a unit time. Speed is expressed
in m/s, fps, mph etc. units. Speed is given by:
V=x/t………………2.1
V=dx/dt…………………….2.2
Where,
x = Distance (mile or meter or feet)
t = Time (second or hour)
Speed acquired by using Eq 2.1 will give the average speed. If Eq 2.2 is used the
instantaneous speed will be found. Some basic terminology is mentioned below:
Spot Speed
Spot speed is the speed of the vehicle as it passes a fixed point along a section of the
roadway. Spot speed is determined by measuring the time required for a vehicle to
traverse a specified distance along a road. Spot speed studies are conducted to draw the
speed distribution curve along a road section.
Running Speed
Running speed is determined by dividing the total distance by the total running time
for the route. That is, all stoptime delays are excluded. Overall Speed and Running
Speed studies are conducted over a specified route for determining quality of service
between alternate routes. The main purpose of all speed studies is to obtain speed
12. Page 5
distributions, identify hazardous areas (excess speed), accident analyses, traffic control
planning, and check geometric design. For speed studies, off-peak hours are used for
conducting surveys on open stretches of straight roads away from the influence of stop
signs, construction and signals.
Average Speed
Average speed is the arithmetic mean of all observed vehicle speeds (which is the sum
of all spot speeds divided by the number of recorded speeds).
Median Speed
It is the speed at the middle value in a series of spot speeds that are arranged in
ascending order. 50 percent of the speed values will be greater than the median; 50
percent will be less than the median.
Modal Speed
It is the speed value that occurs most frequently in a sample of spot speeds.
The ith-percentile
The ith-percentile Spot Speed which is the spot speed value below which i percent of
the vehicles travel; for example, 85th-percentile spot speed is the speed below which 85
percent of the vehicles travel and above which 15 percent of the vehicles travel.
Pace Speed:
It is the highest speed within a specific range of speeds that represents more
vehicles than in any other like range of speed. The range of speeds typically used is 10
km/h or 10 mph.
Design speed
Design speed is defined as the maximum safe speed that can be maintained over a
specified section of highway when conditions are so favorable that the design features
of the highway govern (ITE 1999). This definition implies that the design speed should be
selected based on drivers expectations, the type of highway and terrain and topography.
Space-Mean-Speed (SMS)
Space-Mean-Speed is the average of vehicle speeds weighted according to how long
they remain on the section of road. Mathematically it is harmonic mean of the observed
speeds.
Time-Mean-Speed (TMS)
The time mean speed is the arithmetic mean of spot speeds of all vehicles passing a
point during a specified interval of time.
13. Page 6
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 General:
When we measure the traffic parameter over a short distance, we generally measure the spot
speed. A spot speed is made by measuring the individual speeds of a sample of the vehicle
passing a given spot on a street or highway. Spot speed studies are used to determine the speed
distribution of a traffic stream at a specific location. The data gathered in spot speed studies are
used to determine vehicle speed percentiles, which are useful in making many speed-related
decisions. Methods of conducting spot speed Studies are divided into two main categories:
1. Manual Method
2. Automatic method
3.2 Manual Method:
Spot speeds may be estimated by manually measuring the time it takes a vehicle to travel
between two defined points on the roadway a known distance apart (short distance), usually less
than 90m. Distance between two points is generally depending upon the average speed of traffic
stream. Following tables gives recommended study length (in meters) for various average stream
speed ranges (in kmph)
Stream Speed(kmph) Length(m)
Below 15 30
15-25 60
Above 25 90
Table 3.1: Recommended Study length for various average stream speed
Two common manual methods are described below in brief:
3.2.a. Pavement markings:
In this method, markings of pavement are placed across the road at each end of trap. Observer
start and stops the watch as vehicle passes lines. In this method, minimum two observers
required to collect the data, of which one is stand at the starting point to start and stop the
stop watch and other one is stand at end point to give indication to stop the watch when
vehicle passes the end line. Advantages of this method are that after the initial installation no
set-up time is required, markings are easily renewed, and disadvantage of this is that
substantial error can be introduced, and magnitude of error may change for substitute studies
and this method is only applicable for low traffic conditions.
Source: Dr. Tom V. Mathew, IIT Bombay, Measurement over a Short Section,
Chapter 27, Transportation System Engineering
14. Fig 3.1: Pavement marking
3.2. b. Enoscope or Mirror box
Enoscope consists of a simple open housing containing a mirror mounted on a tripod at the side
of the road in such a way that an observer’s li
stands at one end of section and on the other end enoscope is placed and measure the time
taken by the vehicle to cross the section (fig 6.2). Advantages of this method are that it simple
and eliminate the errors due to parallax and considerable time is required to time each vehicle,
which lengthen the study period and under heavy traffic condition it may be difficult to relate
ostentatious to proper vehicle are the disadvantages of
Figure 3.2: Enoscope Method
3.3 Automatic Method:
Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATRs) offer a quick, affordable, and
data over any period and can be presented in a range of fo
Page 7
3.2. b. Enoscope or Mirror box:
Enoscope consists of a simple open housing containing a mirror mounted on a tripod at the side
of the road in such a way that an observer’s line of sight turned through 90o. The observer
stands at one end of section and on the other end enoscope is placed and measure the time
taken by the vehicle to cross the section (fig 6.2). Advantages of this method are that it simple
s due to parallax and considerable time is required to time each vehicle,
which lengthen the study period and under heavy traffic condition it may be difficult to relate
ostentatious to proper vehicle are the disadvantages of enoscope method.
Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATRs) offer a quick, affordable, and reliable way to collect vehicle
data over any period and can be presented in a range of formats to suit individual client
Enoscope consists of a simple open housing containing a mirror mounted on a tripod at the side
ne of sight turned through 90o. The observer
stands at one end of section and on the other end enoscope is placed and measure the time
taken by the vehicle to cross the section (fig 6.2). Advantages of this method are that it simple
s due to parallax and considerable time is required to time each vehicle,
which lengthen the study period and under heavy traffic condition it may be difficult to relate
reliable way to collect vehicle
rmats to suit individual client
15. Page 8
requirements. Automatic traffic count data is used for a variety of purposes to support transport
planning and design considerations. It is a highly cost effective method of collecting large volumes
of classified and/ or speed data. Accu-Traffic has always been at the forefront of the market for
collecting and presenting this data. Several automatic devices that can be used to obtain the
instantaneous speeds of vehicles at a location on a highway are now available on the market.
These automatic devices can be grouped into three main categories.
3.3. a. Road Detector (Pressure contact strips):
The pressure contact strips, either pneumatic or electric, are used to indicate the time of
entering and leaving the base length. When a vehicle passes over the tube laid at the first
reference point, an air impulse is sent, which activates an electromagnetically controlled stop
watch in the hands of the observer. When the vehicle passes over the second tube, the stop
watch automatically stops. Then the reading is noted by the observer or is auto saved into
computer. The risk of human error is reduced, and parallax error can be avoided completely.
This is the best method over short distance. It gives quite relevant data and if it is connected
through graphical recorder then it gives continuous data automatically. But Pressure contact
tubes are easily sensed by the drivers which may affect their behavior.
Fig 3.3: Pneumatic road tube method
3.3. b. Doppler-Principle Meters (Radar)
This radar meters are frequently used for measurement of spot speed.It measures speed
directly by measuring the difference in the frequency between the emitted and reflected radar
wave emitted on an oncoming vehicle. It is radar meter which is targeted to a vehicle, so the
wave, the frequency between the emitted and reflected wave that the difference is used to
calculate the speed. This is normally referred as Doppler Effect. Dynamometer actually works
based on the principle of Doppler Effect, which justifies the difference in frequency is
16. Page 9
proportional to the speed of oncoming vehicle. Using this principle the instrument is
programmed to calculate the speed of the vehicle.
This is recent advancement in speed studies; it automatically records speed, and
employs a radar transmitter-receiver unit. The apparatus transmits high frequency
electromagnetic waves as a narrow beam towards the moving vehicle, the beam changes
its frequency depending up on the vehicle’s speed and is returned to the receiver unit.
Upon calibration spot speed of the vehicle is obtained.
Fig 3.4 : Radar Gun image
3.3. c. Electronic-Principle Detectors (Photography)
In this method a camera records the distance moved by a vehicle in a selected short time. In this
exposure of photograph should be in a constant time interval and the distance travelled by the vehicle is
measured by projecting the films during the exposure interval. The main advantage of method is that, it
gives a permanent record with 100% sample obtained. This method is quite expensive and generally
adopted in a situation where evidence is required. Even video recorder can be used which give more
accurate result.
Fig 3.5 : Photography method
17. Page
10
3.4. The Method we followed:
Before going for the actual work we have conducted a reconnaissance survey on the previous
day of actual work. Due to lack of instruments we could not adopt any of the automatic
methods described in this chapter. We have selected the reference points where we collected
speed data according to Manual Strip method. A stopwatch was used for the experiment. The
marked area was 44 feet long. Each time the front of a car would enter the speed trap, the time
recording was started. When the car exited the speed trap, the timer was stopped.The limits
were measurements of time, in seconds, that corresponded to a measurement of speed, in
miles per hour. The time, location, weather and road conditions were also recorded. The safety
engineer was in charge of data. But if we could conduct the actual reconnaissance work then
we would have good understanding of the whole formation of the study zone.
18. Page
11
CHAPTER 4
DATA COLLECTION
4.1 Date and time:
The survey took place on March 23, 2017. It was Thursday. Data was collected for 10
minutes, which was took place from 08.30am to 08.40am.
4.2 Weather Condition:
Sky was clear; It was a sunny morning.
4.3 Location:
The data were collected in the Panthapath road in between Panthapath to Russel Square
intersection. Eight groups were appointed to collect traffic volume data in different points
Fig 4.1: Panthapath Intersection to Russel Square Intersection (Blue dots)
19. Page
12
4.4 Observation:
The goal of observation was to count vehicle to determine the spot speed of different type of
traffic along survey road. As a result vehicles were classified in different categories and they
were counted throughout the period.
4.5 Method and Equipment:
Traffic was counted according to Manual Strip method and for recording data a tabulated tally
sheet was prepared which come handy in recording classified vehicle count. Mobile Stop watch
was used to measure time.
4.6 Number of Enumerators:
There were 7 enumerators in the group. Every enumerator was appointed to count one or
more than one category of vehicle.
36. Page
29
Table 5.2: Average speed and time of different vehicles
5.2 Weighted Average Speed Calculation:
Speed range
(mph)
No of vehicles
observed (f)
Mid speed V
(mph)
%
Frequency
Cumulative
% Frequency
V×f
2-5 9 3.5 1.55 1.55 31.5
5-8 66 6.5 11.40 12.95 429
8-11 118 9.5 20.38 33.33 1121
11-14 160 12.5 27.63 60.97 2000
14-17 101 15.5 17.44 78.41 1565.5
17-20 59 18.5 10.19 88.60 1091.5
20-23 35 21.5 6.04 94.65 752.5
23-26 12 24.5 2.07 96.72 294
26-29 7 27.5 1.21 97.93 192.5
29-32 12 30.5 2.07 100.00 366
∑ = 579 ∑ × =7843.5
From the above table ,
Weighted average speed =
∑ ×
∑
=
.
= 13.55mph
Vehicle Babytaxi Car/Taxi Bus Truck Microbus Motorcycle Pickup Ambulance Jeep/Pajero
Utility
Vehicle
Average
Speed
(mph)
11.53 14.90 11.65 11.27 13.42 16.25 11.37 11.28 16.18 14.54
Average
Time(sec)
2.15 1.69 2.32 2.66 1.63 1.50 1.70 1.73 1.91 1.35
37. 5.3 Histogram, Frequency Curve and Cumulative
Fig 5.1 : Histogram showing No. of vehicles and speed range
9
66
118
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2-5 5-8 8-11
No
of
Vehicles
Page
30
5.3 Histogram, Frequency Curve and Cumulative Frequency Curve:
Fig 5.1 : Histogram showing No. of vehicles and speed range
118
160
101
59
35
12
11 11-14 14-17 17-20 20-23 23-26 26
Speed Range (mph)
Histogram
7
12
26-29 29-32
38. Fig 5.2 : % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph
From fig 5.2:
Modal speed (speed at the highest frequency) = 12.8 mph
Pace (range of speed) = 7-17 mph
1.55
11.40
20.38
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
3 8
%
Frequency
Page
31
Fig 5.2 : % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph
Modal speed (speed at the highest frequency) = 12.8 mph
17 mph
27.63
17.44
10.19
6.04
2.07
13 18 23
Spot Speed (mph)
Frequency Curve
Modal Speed= 12.8 mph
Pace= 7-17 mph
1.21
2.07
28
12.8 mph
17 mph
39. Fig 5.3: Cumulative % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph
From fig 5.3:
Design speed (98th
percentile) = 29 mph
Safe speed (85th
percentile) = 17.8 mph
Speed limits upper (15th
to 85th
percentile) =7 mph ~ 17.8 mph
5.4 Discussion on spot speed:
There were a large variety of speeds in the roadway we studied. It was understood when we
took data from the field. At first we assumed that the representative vehicles will fulfill our
desire of study but afterwards we felt the shortcomings of our assumptions. The percentage
frequency curve and the cumulative percentage frequency curve was smooth enough. And
from the charts we could calculate the modal speed, pace and different percentile speeds
flexibly.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3 8
Cumulative
%
Speed Cumulative Frequency Curve
15th percentile=7 mph
98th percentile= 29 mph
Page
32
Cumulative % Frequency vs Spot Speed Graph
percentile) = 29 mph
percentile) = 17.8 mph
percentile) =7 mph ~ 17.8 mph
Discussion on spot speed:
of speeds in the roadway we studied. It was understood when we
took data from the field. At first we assumed that the representative vehicles will fulfill our
desire of study but afterwards we felt the shortcomings of our assumptions. The percentage
ency curve and the cumulative percentage frequency curve was smooth enough. And
from the charts we could calculate the modal speed, pace and different percentile speeds
13 18 23 28
Spot Speed (mph)
Cumulative Frequency Curve
15th percentile=7 mph
85th percentile=17.8
mph
98th percentile= 29 mph
of speeds in the roadway we studied. It was understood when we
took data from the field. At first we assumed that the representative vehicles will fulfill our
desire of study but afterwards we felt the shortcomings of our assumptions. The percentage
ency curve and the cumulative percentage frequency curve was smooth enough. And
from the charts we could calculate the modal speed, pace and different percentile speeds
28 33
40. Page
33
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 General:
This chapter discusses on the results obtained from the analysis and their importance. This report
presented all possible analysis by the data collected from field survey.
6.2 Results from Data Analysis in tabular form:
Weighted average speed 13.55 mph
Modal speed (speed at the highest
frequency)
12.8 mph
Pace (range of speed) 7-17 mph
Design speed (98th
percentile) 29 mph
Safe speed (85th
percentile) 17.8 mph
Speed limits upper (15th
to 85th
percentile) 7-17.8 mph
6.3 Limitation:
We collected data for representative portion of traffic stream. However if it was
possible to collect data for each and every type of vehicle then a better scenario could
have been presented.
There was no free flow condition present continuously which interrupted the
experiment.
We got the data of a specific portion of a day on a particular day. But it obviously
doesn’t represent the total traffic stream in actual condition.
6.4 Recommendations:
There are some recommendations based on the study took place. They are as follows-
NMT or electrical low speed vehicles should not be permitted in this type of arterial road.
Although they typically travel on the left lane but they create a drag force which slows down
the high speed vehicles which creates congestion.
Bicycle should have specific lanes of their own which typically is placed beside the
footpath/shoulder. But there was not any specific lane in the road we studied. So it is
recommended that a lane system should be introduced to increase efficiency of the road at
the same time there should be a bicycle specific lane.
41. Page
34
6.5 Scope for Further Study:
The present study is focused mainly on traffic speed only. Various other experiments could
be conducted depending on the data we had in out possession. However due to lack of time
we conduct those extensive experiments and it is suggested that those studies should be
conducted in future to have a good understanding of the traffic condition of the roadway we
studied in this time.
42. Page
35
References
https://www.cambridgema.gov/traffic/engineeringplanning/speedstudies,
accessed on 06 April,2017, Time:11.00 pm
https://www.codot.gov/projects/contextsensitivesolutions/design/design-
speed-study/designspeedstudy-appendix-a.pdf/view, accessed on 06 April,2017,
Time:11.00 pm
http://civilengineeringlaboratory.blogspot.com/2012/02/spot-speed-
study.html, accessed on 07 April,2017, Time:12.00 pm
http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tvm/1111_nptel/522_TrSpeed/plain/, accessed on 07
April,2017, Time: 10:00 pm
http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/pubs/traffichandbook/ , accessed on 07 April,2017,
Time :12.00 pm
https://prezi.com/s8f7bimrk5ul/spot-speed-study/ , accessed on 08 April,2017,
Time : 03:30 pm
https://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tvm/1111_nptel/522_TrSpeed/fancy.pdf, accessed
on 08 April,2017 Time :10:00 pm
[American Society of Civil Engineers The Twelfth COTA International Conference
of Transportation Professionals - Beijing, China (August 3-6, 2012)] CICTP 2012 -
Study on Average Travel Speed in Road Network Calculated by Floating Car Data
in Different Sample First page:393,Last page:401
[American Society of Civil Engineers Ninth International Conference on
Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation (AATT) - Chicago, Illinois,
United States (August 13-16, 2006)] Applications of Advanced Technology in
Transportation - A Case Study on Measuring Travel Time, Speed, and Delay Using
GPS-Instrumented Test Vehicles
Nicholas J Garber Lester A Hoe, Traffic and Highway Engineering. Cengage
Learning Product, Fourth Edition, 2009.
Dr. Tom V. Mathew, IIT Bombay, Measurement over a Short Section, Chapter 27,
Transportation System Engineering.
CE 351 Class note by Professor, Dr. Md. Shamsul Hoque.