8. The Area of Distribution
G Physiological
requirements
(Abiotic)
A
Favorable biotic
environment
(Biotic)
B
Accessible to
dispersal
(Movements)
M
9. The A and B Circles
• Physiological
requirements
• Non-reactive variables.
Uncoupled
• Roughly independent of
the interactions
• Low “resolution”
• Biotic requirements and
impacts. Resource
consumption,
interactions,
competitors,
predators...
• Variables interactive,
dynamically coupled
• High resolution
A B
10. A Useful and Forgotten Distinction of
Hutchinson (1978)
• Scenopoetic variables. Non-
interacting, slowly changing
from a species point of view.
Define conditions
• Bionomic variables. Coupled,
fast changing. Define
regulation
• Hutchinson´s useful
distinction was quickly
forgotten and then
reinvented by Austin, Begon,
Jackson & Overpeck,
Meszena and others.
17. Demonstration of M Effects
• Clear demonstration of the importance of
dispersal limitation on species’ distributions
• Invasive species – originally confined to a
native distributional area
• Some transport (often human-mediated)
expands M
• Distribution expands accordingly
18. Abiotic niche
Biotic interactionsAccessibility
Area presenting
appropriate
combinations of
abiotic and
biotic conditions
(= potential
distribution)
Actual geographic distribution
(abiotic and biotic conditions fulfilled,
accessible to dispersers)
19.
20. Aedes albopictus
• Known as the “Asian Tiger
Mosquito”
• Invader; fastest spreading
mosquito in the world
• Aggressive daytime biter
and pest
• Known to transmit
Dengue, La Crosse, St.
Louis, Eastern Equine,
Ross River, Rift Valley, and
West Nile Viruses
29. Five Goals of Niche Modeling?
1. ESTIMATE THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE
2. ESTIMATE THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE
3. ESTIMATE THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE
4. ESTIMATE THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE
5. ESTIMATE THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE
30. How Would the Fundamental Niche Look?
• In any one dimension, expected to be
unimodal
• In multiple dimensions, expected to be convex
• So, simple models are probably better
• Need to take sampling and incomplete
representation into account carefully
46. Assess levels of spatial
autocorrelation in
environmental data,
adjust input point data
accordingly
Estimate ecological
niche (various
algorithms)
Evaluation reality of
model transfer results,
when possible
Transfer to other
situations—time and
space
Project niche
model to
geographic
space
Model calibration,
adjusting parameters to
maximize quality
Collate primary
biodiversity data
documenting
occurrences
Process environmental
layers to be maximally
relevant to distributional
ecology of species in
question
Collate GIS database of
relevant environmental
data layers
Assess BAM scenario for
species in question; avoid
M-limited situations
Saupe et al. 2012. Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need
for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecological Modelling, 237–238, 11-22.
Estimate M as
area of analysis
in study
Barve et al. 2011. The crucial role of the
accessible area in ecological niche modeling and
species distribution modeling. Ecological
Modelling, 222, 1810-1819.
Assess extrapolation
(MESS and MOP)
KU Ecological Niche Modeling Group. 2013.
Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche
models by limited environmental ranges on
calibration areas. In preparation.
Model evaluation
Peterson et al. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating
characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche
modelling. Ecological Modelling, 213, 63-72.
Model thresholding
Peterson et al. 2007. Transferability and
model evaluation in ecological niche
modeling: A comparison of GARP and
Maxent. Ecography, 30, 550-560.
Assess spatial precision of
occurrence data, adjust
inclusion of data (obs and
env) accordingly
General Methodological Summary:
Peterson et al. (2011) Ecological Niches
and Geographic Distributions, Princeton
University Press, Princeton.
Refine
estimate of
current
distribution via
land use, etc.
Reduce dimensionality
Compare present and
future to assess
effects of change