Nottingham Trent University and Alexander Street have
partnered to pilot an in-depth view on analytics, demonstrating
user engagement and impact of use. They will share findings
on how e-resources were used and how these analytics can
go beyond simple cost-per-use evaluation to support effective
decision making on the marketing and promotion of resources
and improve our understanding of how library users are
engaging with the resources we provide.
The case for learning analytics - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
Jisc is developing a learning analytics service in consultation with universities and colleges, suppliers and key stakeholders. The rationale is to provide universities and colleges with a basic solution that can form the basis of a complete solution to all you learning analytics requirements.
We believe Jisc are uniquely placed to provide a national infrastructure that can support the future development of learning analytics within the UK.
This session will explore the case for learning analytics, does it work and do you need it?
Infographic: Awareness of OER and OEP in HE institutions ScotlandOEPScotland
The Open Educational Practices in Scotland (OEPS) Project conducted a survey to find out about the level of awareness of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP) among HE institutions in Scotland. In total 235 valid responses were collected in a five-week period from 19th October 2015 to 23rd November 2015. This infographic highlights some of the findings. If you are interested in reading the full interim report, please visit http://www.slideshare.net/OEPScotland/awareness-of-oer-and-oep-in-scottish-higher-education-institutions-survey-results
Nottingham Trent University and Alexander Street have
partnered to pilot an in-depth view on analytics, demonstrating
user engagement and impact of use. They will share findings
on how e-resources were used and how these analytics can
go beyond simple cost-per-use evaluation to support effective
decision making on the marketing and promotion of resources
and improve our understanding of how library users are
engaging with the resources we provide.
The case for learning analytics - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
Jisc is developing a learning analytics service in consultation with universities and colleges, suppliers and key stakeholders. The rationale is to provide universities and colleges with a basic solution that can form the basis of a complete solution to all you learning analytics requirements.
We believe Jisc are uniquely placed to provide a national infrastructure that can support the future development of learning analytics within the UK.
This session will explore the case for learning analytics, does it work and do you need it?
Infographic: Awareness of OER and OEP in HE institutions ScotlandOEPScotland
The Open Educational Practices in Scotland (OEPS) Project conducted a survey to find out about the level of awareness of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP) among HE institutions in Scotland. In total 235 valid responses were collected in a five-week period from 19th October 2015 to 23rd November 2015. This infographic highlights some of the findings. If you are interested in reading the full interim report, please visit http://www.slideshare.net/OEPScotland/awareness-of-oer-and-oep-in-scottish-higher-education-institutions-survey-results
This presentation was provided by Melissa Russell and Mike Matousek, both of Cengage, during the NISO Virtual Conference, Opening Up Education, held on April 19, 2017.
A presentation delivered at the ER&L (Electronic Resources and Libraries) conference in Atlanta, March 2008. It looks at the potential of collaborative technologies and practices that could transform the management of electronic resources, particularly e-journals, in libraries today.
This webinar is based on experiences of working over the past two years with a number of further education (FE) colleges to help them increase engagement with digital resources and library services. It draws on the recommendations of a number of librarians/learning resources managers on how they have increased engagement with, and use of, their resources. The emphasis will be on non-technical approaches to enhance student experience, learning and teaching.
Lis Parcell will share recommendations which will be particularly useful for librarians and learning resources staff in FE colleges, but may also be of interest to staff working in smaller university library services. Participants will be encouraged to contribute their own views on the challenges they face in increasing engagement with their digital resources and library services. We will also highlight further support available from Jisc in this area. Lis will co-present with Elizabeth Newbold, Library Manager at Activate Learning.
Julie CleverleyLeeds Beckett UniversityIn 2017-18 we undertook a pilot project to evaluate OpenAthens, EZ Proxy and Student Record data to enable in-depth analysis of e-resources usage, student engagement and library impact. The project objective was to provide evidence and insight to inform e-resource acquisition so that our users had appropriate, impactful and value for money resources, and thus a successful learning and teaching experience. We are now starting to look at School data, comparing it with NSS results to measure the correlation between usage of and engagement with e-resources and student feedback.
Librarians are increasingly being asked to engage with
bibliometrics to help with institutional decision making.
However, few have professional qualifications in this area and
there is an onus on universities to do metrics responsibly. A
small project supported by the Lis-Bibliometrics forum and
Elsevier Research Intelligence Division is developing a set of
bibliometric competency statements to ensure practitioners are
equipped to do their work responsibly and well. This workshop
will report on progress to date and invite input into the project.
This presentation was provided by Ashley Miller of Ohio State University during the NISO Virtual Conference, Opening Up Education, held on April 19, 2017.
Prof. Salvacion M. Arlante, university librarian of the University of the Philippines Diliman, presented the challenges for librarians in the acquisitions of quality academic journals during C&E's Academic Publishing Forum on January 26, 2011 at C&E Information and Resource Center, Quezon City.
Getting ready for learning analytics - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
How ready are you to implement learning analytics in your institution?
Jisc has been offering an institutional readiness assessment to institutions involved in the development phases of the learning analytics project. Building on the learning so far we will provide participants of this workshop with questions and activities that will start you on the journey.
The workshop will explore legal and ethical issues that you may need to address; technical and data challenges that may have to be overcome and cultural issues that are required.
How Accessible Is Our Collection? Performing an E-Resources Accessibility ReviewNASIG
Michael Fernandez, presenter
While the growth and adoption of electronic resources has been exponential, there has been a concurrent lag in ensuring that e-resources are accessible by users with disabilities. Vendors have become increasingly aware of this issue and are taking steps to address it; however, given the sheer size of the library marketplace, there is a noticeable lack of consistency across vendor platforms. In the Summer of 2016, American University Library began evaluating the accessibility of its web content as part of a university-wide initiative focusing on Section 508 compliance. This review entailed not only library hosted websites, but also third party platforms for databases, e-journals, and e-books. In order to assess the accessibility of the library’s subscribed e-resources, the Electronic Resources Management Unit created an accessibility inventory. All subscribed e-resources were evaluated to gauge the efforts being made by vendors to make their products accessible. The methodology for this inventory involved seeking out voluntary product accessibility templates (VPATs), identifying clearly marked accessibility statements on the vendor site or platform, and reviewing current license agreements for verbiage that ensures a commitment to accessibility regulations and allows for remediation of accessibility issues that may be identified. This inventory represented an initial but crucial step towards e-resource accessibility. AU Library was able to identify the vendors who have already taken measures, and for those who had not, we identified the opportunity to create a dialogue. In this presentation, I’ll detail methods and resources that can be used in order to assess the status of a collection’s accessibility. Additionally, I’ll describe how AU Library was able to collaborate on this shared goal by identifying allies across the university in the offices of assistive technology and procurement. Finally, I’ll discuss our strategies for further educating and engaging with vendors.
This presentation was provided by Melissa Russell and Mike Matousek, both of Cengage, during the NISO Virtual Conference, Opening Up Education, held on April 19, 2017.
A presentation delivered at the ER&L (Electronic Resources and Libraries) conference in Atlanta, March 2008. It looks at the potential of collaborative technologies and practices that could transform the management of electronic resources, particularly e-journals, in libraries today.
This webinar is based on experiences of working over the past two years with a number of further education (FE) colleges to help them increase engagement with digital resources and library services. It draws on the recommendations of a number of librarians/learning resources managers on how they have increased engagement with, and use of, their resources. The emphasis will be on non-technical approaches to enhance student experience, learning and teaching.
Lis Parcell will share recommendations which will be particularly useful for librarians and learning resources staff in FE colleges, but may also be of interest to staff working in smaller university library services. Participants will be encouraged to contribute their own views on the challenges they face in increasing engagement with their digital resources and library services. We will also highlight further support available from Jisc in this area. Lis will co-present with Elizabeth Newbold, Library Manager at Activate Learning.
Julie CleverleyLeeds Beckett UniversityIn 2017-18 we undertook a pilot project to evaluate OpenAthens, EZ Proxy and Student Record data to enable in-depth analysis of e-resources usage, student engagement and library impact. The project objective was to provide evidence and insight to inform e-resource acquisition so that our users had appropriate, impactful and value for money resources, and thus a successful learning and teaching experience. We are now starting to look at School data, comparing it with NSS results to measure the correlation between usage of and engagement with e-resources and student feedback.
Librarians are increasingly being asked to engage with
bibliometrics to help with institutional decision making.
However, few have professional qualifications in this area and
there is an onus on universities to do metrics responsibly. A
small project supported by the Lis-Bibliometrics forum and
Elsevier Research Intelligence Division is developing a set of
bibliometric competency statements to ensure practitioners are
equipped to do their work responsibly and well. This workshop
will report on progress to date and invite input into the project.
This presentation was provided by Ashley Miller of Ohio State University during the NISO Virtual Conference, Opening Up Education, held on April 19, 2017.
Prof. Salvacion M. Arlante, university librarian of the University of the Philippines Diliman, presented the challenges for librarians in the acquisitions of quality academic journals during C&E's Academic Publishing Forum on January 26, 2011 at C&E Information and Resource Center, Quezon City.
Getting ready for learning analytics - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
How ready are you to implement learning analytics in your institution?
Jisc has been offering an institutional readiness assessment to institutions involved in the development phases of the learning analytics project. Building on the learning so far we will provide participants of this workshop with questions and activities that will start you on the journey.
The workshop will explore legal and ethical issues that you may need to address; technical and data challenges that may have to be overcome and cultural issues that are required.
How Accessible Is Our Collection? Performing an E-Resources Accessibility ReviewNASIG
Michael Fernandez, presenter
While the growth and adoption of electronic resources has been exponential, there has been a concurrent lag in ensuring that e-resources are accessible by users with disabilities. Vendors have become increasingly aware of this issue and are taking steps to address it; however, given the sheer size of the library marketplace, there is a noticeable lack of consistency across vendor platforms. In the Summer of 2016, American University Library began evaluating the accessibility of its web content as part of a university-wide initiative focusing on Section 508 compliance. This review entailed not only library hosted websites, but also third party platforms for databases, e-journals, and e-books. In order to assess the accessibility of the library’s subscribed e-resources, the Electronic Resources Management Unit created an accessibility inventory. All subscribed e-resources were evaluated to gauge the efforts being made by vendors to make their products accessible. The methodology for this inventory involved seeking out voluntary product accessibility templates (VPATs), identifying clearly marked accessibility statements on the vendor site or platform, and reviewing current license agreements for verbiage that ensures a commitment to accessibility regulations and allows for remediation of accessibility issues that may be identified. This inventory represented an initial but crucial step towards e-resource accessibility. AU Library was able to identify the vendors who have already taken measures, and for those who had not, we identified the opportunity to create a dialogue. In this presentation, I’ll detail methods and resources that can be used in order to assess the status of a collection’s accessibility. Additionally, I’ll describe how AU Library was able to collaborate on this shared goal by identifying allies across the university in the offices of assistive technology and procurement. Finally, I’ll discuss our strategies for further educating and engaging with vendors.
eBooks in Health Sciences - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (the 11th Annual ...Charleston Conference
eBooks in Health Sciences - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (the 11th Annual Health Sciences Lively Lunch)
Speakers: Nicole Gallo, Rittenhouse Book Distributors, Inc.; John Tagler, Association of American Publishers, Inc.; Deborah Blecic, The Richard J. Daley Library of the University of Illinois at Chicago; Ramune Kubilius, Northwestern University, Galter Health Sciences Library.
This session will address the current landscape and potential future direction of eBooks in the health sciences. From the perspectives of a publisher, an aggregator, and a librarian, the panel and the audience will discuss "the good, the bad, and the ugly" trends and practices facing stakeholders, as book collections become increasingly electronic.
And, as tradition dictates, Ramune Kubilius will also share her annual "Year in Review", summarizing significant developments in the world of health sciences collection development over the last 12 months.
At the American Library Association's National Library Legislative Day, Pew Internet Director Lee Rainie will discuss 11 key takeaways from the Project's libraries research.
Do the Outcomes Justify the Buzz?: An Assessment of LibGuides at Cornell Univ...Steven Adams
Springshare's LibGuides has inspired significant buzz in the library blogosphere. Touted for its "Web 2.0" functions, attractive interface, and ease of use for librarians, Libguides has transformed the way many libraries build web-based research guides. Cornell and Princeton Universities decided to collaborate on an assessment initiative to discover how these guides are valued on each campus. This study goes beyond the "2.0" dogma to empirically determine if LibGuides lives up to its publicity.
Presented By:
Steven Adams
Princeton University
Angela Horne
Director, Management Library, Cornell University
Why should you care about OER is an overview of OER and the California Open Online Library for Education (cool4ed.org) given for faculty at the Porterville College Summer Institute on May 25, 2015.
Una Daly, CCCOER Director (May 2016)
5. How We Spend our $$
Oberlin Group Data
Year 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03
Books 36% 37.3% 34.3% 32.7%
Serials 49% 50% 50.1% 51%
Electronic 11.1% 11.8% 13.3% 15.55%
Resources
6. What Can We Stop Buying?
Tri-college Study
53% said print should be kept somewhere in Tri-Colleges; 39%
said e-only is fine
DLF/CLIR Study
Over 60% of respondents said keep everything
Only 15% of respondents suggested we might not need to keep
print journals
Varied by discipline:
Physical Sciences, Law and Business 13%
All other disciplines 7-8%
Net effect of e-resources is additive, not substitutive
8. Creating the Connection:
Cataloging and Metadata
Disappearing ink: the problems of
bibliographic control of e-resources
Aggregation/Dis-aggregation
Web sites
The “I know I used that journal last month,
why can’t I get to it today” problem
9. Helping Make the Connection
Ensuring the resources are catalogued in the
OPAC
Designing Web sites that help users locate these
resources
Integrating resources into CMS
Contracting with service providers like Serials
Solutions to maintain lists of e-journals
SFX and other linking services, so that no matter
where a user starts their search, they can chain
through to needed resources
10. Why Can’t my Library Catalog
be more like Amazon?
In evaluating whether a book might be useful, the following
types of information are most helpful
Table of Contents - 88%
Reviews in Disciplinary Journals - 88%
Preface/introduction - 72%
Bibliography - 61%
First chapter - 56%
General book reviews - 56%
11. Why Can’t I Get …?
OCLC study found that a major barrier to
successful use of library resources is the
inability to access databases remotely due to
password and/or license restrictions
Printing management
Public computers: how many are enough?
12. Reference and Help Seeking
False confidence syndrome: Students are
very confident in their abilities to find
information; 3 of 4 say they are successful
in finding information needed for courses
and assignments
Only 20% ever use a reference librarian
80% prefer face to face contact when
seeking help
13. Interlibrary Loan
ILL
Lending increased 35% from last year (first
quarter data)
Borrowing increased 20% in same time period
Licenses restrict ability to ILL e-journals
14. What is our Competition?
About 30% of faculty, graduate and undergraduate
students cite the library as a very important source
for information for keeping current
Faculty most often responded that personal
subscriptions/libraries were very important
(55.9%)
Students most often responded that the open
Internet was very important
But varied by discipline
15. Faculty report that 59% of information used in
research comes from the physical or virtual library
Graduate students reported over 70%
Undergrads reported that 66% of information
needed for coursework came from the library
But they also reported using Internet sources about
the same percentage
90% of students use library’s print resources
16. Where do Faculty and Students
do their Research?
27% of Swarthmore faculty came into the library
at several times a week or more
72% used online resources from home or office
several times a week or more
Faculty reported that 74% of the time that they are
accessing info they are in their offices (contrasted
with 9.6% in library)
90% of students access library web from home
and 80% prefer that form of access
17. Where do our Students Go to do
their Assignments?
2001 study found 65% of Swarthmore students
started their research at the Catalog
OCLC Study found 79% of college students first
choice web resource for most assignments are
search engines
Only 40% said they used library web site for most
assignments
Pew Study found 73% reported using Internet
more than library for information searching
18. What do Users Value?
Convenience
Speed
Ease of Access
Quality/accuracy
Currency
Coverage
Ability to search and to print
19. Is Information Overload a
Problem?
25% of students said it was
For small colleges, 90% of the downloads
were from journals previously not owned
by the library
Downloads of articles indicate significantly
higher use than print.
Recent survey of Oberlin Group found on
average 16,000 + JSTOR articles viewed
20. Academic Libraries Respond
New collection development models
New ways to manage the administrative data
Development of digital repositories
Enhanced cataloging
Linking services
Dynamic library websites to provide alternative
ways to get to resources
21. Academic Libraries Respond
Library support for CMS
Systems to allow for remote access to these
resources
Printing and public computing management to
control costs and improve access
Online reference services
Library instruction
More support for ILL
22. Some Concluding Thoughts
What challenges remain?
Integration of open Internet and library based
resources (RedLightGreen)
Better design that reflects needs and practices
Integration between print and online
More backfiles
Greater clarity about what’s available or not
Ease of authentication for remote use of
proprietary sources