Background
• Classes: OSHA 10/30 Hour, Incident Investigation,
Confined Space, Excavation Safety, Cranes Signaling,
Rigging Safety, Fall Protection, Scaffold Competent Person,
Silica Competent Person, CHST Prep, Lockout, Machine
Guarding, OSHA Recordkeeping, and Safety Management
• Services: Mock OSHA Inspections, Site Safety Audits,
Expert Witness,
• Since 1987, he has trained over 50,000 people including
OSHA compliance officers and Fortune 500 Clients in
numerous areas of Safety and Health.
1
40 years working with top companies to
achieve world class safety in their sector.
815-354-6853 johnanewquist@gmail.com
Welcome
• Fire/Power Outages
• Restrooms/smoking
• Breaks/lunches
• Student Data Form
• Participant List initial
• DAILY sign-in
• Attendance
• 500 Trainers?
• Introductions/What we
want
• Pretest/Test
• OBJECTIVES
Objectives
• At the end of the training, the
participants will be able to:
• Explain the importance of
energy control programs,
procedures, training, audits and
methods of controlling
hazardous energy.
• Locate and determine
appropriate OSHA Lockout
Standards,
3
Topics
• Hazards and incidents
• Types of hazardous energy,
• Detecting hazardous conditions,
• Implementing control measures as they relate to the
control of hazardous energy,
• Developing and implementing energy control
programs including written isolation procedures,
• Training of authorized and affected employees, and
• Periodic inspection of energy control procedures
using the OSHA control of hazardous energy
standard.
Sep 2018
• Last year, federal OSHA
conducted more than
3,500 inspections under
the Amputations NEP,
constituting more than
10% of all federal OSHA
inspections.
• It found about 7,800
violations and assessed
more than $55 million
in civil penalties.
Control of Hazardous Energy
1910.147
Draft 3 16 2019
Control of Hazardous Energy
1910.147
Lockout/Tagout
Session 1: Definitions, Examining the Need for
Lockout
Definitions
• Affected employee.
• An employee whose job requires
him/her to operate or use a
machine or equipment on which
servicing or maintenance is being
performed under lockout or
tagout, or whose job requires
him/her to work in an area in
which such servicing or
maintenance is being performed.
Affected
• All employees who work in the area
where the energy control
procedure(s) are utilized need to
know about the prohibition against
attempting to restart or reenergize
machines or equipment that is
locked or tagged out.
Definitions
• Authorized employee.
• A person who locks out or tags
out machines or equipment in
order to perform servicing or
maintenance on that machine or
equipment.
• An affected employee becomes
an authorized employee when
that employee's duties include
performing servicing or
maintenance covered under this
section.
Authorized
Needs to be trained in:
• recognition of applicable hazardous
energy sources in the workplace;
• the type and magnitude of energy
found in the workplace;
• the means and methods of isolating
and/or controlling the energy.
Compactors have multiple
energy sources that
require lockout.
Definitions
• Capable of being locked out.
• An energy isolating device is
capable of being locked out if it
has a hasp or other means of
attachment to which, or through
which, a lock can be affixed, or it
has a locking mechanism built
into it.
• Other energy isolating devices are
capable of being locked out, if
lockout can be achieved without
the need to dismantle, rebuild, or
replace the energy isolating
device or permanently alter its
energy control capability.
Definitions
• Energized.
• Connected to an energy source or
containing residual or stored
energy.
Definitions
• Energy isolating device.
• A mechanical device that
physically prevents the
transmission or release of energy.
• Push buttons, selector switches
and other control circuit type
devices are not energy isolating
devices.
Energy Isolating Device
A mechanical device that, when utilized or activated,
physically prevents the transmission or release of
energy, including but not limited to the following:
1. A manually operated electrical circuit breaker;
2. A disconnect switch;
3. A manually operated switch by which the
conductors of a circuit can be
disconnected from all ungrounded supply
conductors, and, in addition, no pole can be operated
independently;
4. A line valve, bolted blank flange and bolted slip
blinds;
5. A block (e.g., a safety block); and
6. Any similar device used to block or isolate energy.
Energy Source
• Any source of:
– Electrical,
– Mechanical,
– Hydraulic,
– Pneumatic,
– Chemical,
– Thermal, or
– Other energy. What kind of energy
did the rock have?
What is hazardous energy?
Energy sources including:
• Electrical
• Mechanical - Kinetic
• Hydraulic
• Pneumatic
• Chemical
• Thermal
• Gravity
• Potential – pressure in vessels
• Radiation
• Other sources in machines
and equipment
Definitions
• Energy source.
• Any source of electrical,
mechanical, hydraulic,
pneumatic, chemical, thermal, or
other energy.
Definitions
• Hot tap.
• A procedure used in the repair,
maintenance and services
activities which involves welding
on a piece of equipment
(pipelines, vessels or tanks) under
pressure, in order to install
connections or appurtenances.
• It is commonly used to replace or
add sections of pipeline without
the interruption of service for air,
gas, water, steam, and
petrochemical distribution
systems.
• This standard does not apply to
the following:
• Hot tap operations involving
transmission and distribution
systems for substances such as
gas, steam, water or petroleum
products when they are
performed on pressurized
pipelines, provided that the
employer demonstrates that-
• continuity of service is essential;
• shutdown of the system is
impractical; and
• documented procedures are
followed, and special equipment
is used which will provide proven
effective protection for
employees.
Definitions
• Lockout.
• The placement of a lockout
device on an energy isolating
device, in accordance with an
established procedure, ensuring
that the energy isolating device
and the equipment being
controlled cannot be operated
until the lockout device is
removed.
Lockout
Lockout Device
• A device that uses a positive
means such as a lock, either
key or combination type, to
hold an energy-isolating
device in the safe position
and prevent the energizing
of a machine or equipment.
Definitions
• Lockout device.
• A device that utilizes a positive
means such as a lock, either key
or combination type, to hold an
energy isolating device in the safe
position and prevent the
energizing of a machine or
equipment.
• Included are blank flanges and
bolted slip blinds.
blank flanges
slip blinds
Energy Isolating Device: Lines
• Isolation procedures
– Blanking/blinding
– Double block and bleed
– Line breaking
Tank with lines entering it
Is the line or vessel
de-pressurized?
Definitions
• Normal production operations.
• The utilization of a machine or
equipment to perform its
intended production function.
Definitions
• Servicing and/or maintenance.
• Workplace activities such as
constructing, installing, setting up,
adjusting, inspecting, modifying,
and maintaining and/or servicing
machines or equipment.
• These activities include lubrication,
cleaning or unjamming of machines
or equipment and making
adjustments or tool changes, where
the employee may be exposed to
the unexpected energization or
startup of the equipment or release
of hazardous energy.
Definitions
• Setting up.
• Any work performed to prepare a
machine or equipment to
perform its normal production
operation.
Definitions
• Tagout.
• The placement of a tagout device
on an energy isolating device, in
accordance with an established
procedure, to indicate that the
energy isolating device and the
equipment being controlled may
not be operated until the tagout
device is removed.
Definitions
• Tagout device.
• A prominent warning device, such
as a tag and a means of
attachment, which can be
securely fastened to an energy
isolating device in accordance
with an established procedure, to
indicate that the energy isolating
device and the equipment being
controlled may not be operated
until the tagout device is
removed.
The Need for LOTO
• OSHA: failure to control energy accounts for nearly
10 percent of serious incidents.
• Case Studies from the NIOSH report: Guidelines for
Controlling Hazardous Energy During Maintenance
and Servicing reports the following:
Pasta machine
May 2014
• A 17-year-old has the ability to
move his right arm again,
thanks to surgery performed at
Massachusetts General
Hospital.
• Brett Bouchard severed his arm
just below the elbow while
cleaning a pasta machine at
work.
June 2016
• Columbus WI
• The teen was working at the
factory on June 27, 2016
when he was pinned in a
machine while cleaning
scrap from underneath a
laser cutter in operation.
• He later died of his injuries
on July 2, 2016.
• The teen had only been
working there two weeks
when the incident
happened.
This IS my sister-in-law's nephew !!!
Killed at 17 ... all because of company
not following safety rules, providing
proper training and equipment to ensure
lockout/tagout - DA
OSHA Oct 2016
• “We are swamped with
AMPUTATIONS”
• Aurora saw about 100-115
amputations in 2016.
• Inspection is about 40%.
• Many during setup with
machine energized.
• They inspect those with
failure of machine guarding
or lockout.
• The minor servicing
exemption comes into play.
Oct 2018
• A 61-year-old man was killed
Friday after being pulled into a
moving HVAC fan while working
at the AAM Casting
manufacturing plant in
Wauwatosa.
34
Exercise
• “A worker’s first day at work
shouldn’t be his last day on
earth,” was OSHA chief David
Michaels’ reaction to the work-
related death of Lawrence
Daquan “Day” Davis.
• The 21-year old was crushed in a
palletizer machine on August 16,
2012 at the Bacardi Bottling
facility in Jacksonville, FL.
• Davis was a temp worker hired by
Remedy Intelligent Staffing. It
was his first day on assignment to
the Bacardi plant.
What Standards?
Find a 147 c 4, 6, 7 standard
Bacardi Citations
July 2016
• Behr sentenced to probation, $350K restitution in South
Beloit plant worker's death
Aug 2015
• Bumble Bee Foods and two
managers were charged by Los
Angeles prosecutors Monday
with violating safety regulations
in the death of a worker who was
cooked in an industrial oven with
tons of tuna.
• Bumble Bee Foods will pay
$6 million for “willfully
violating worker safety
rules,” according to the Los
Angeles County District
Attorney’s office.
• $1.5 Million to the worker’s
family
Issue?
• What would kill these
workers?
Aug 2016
• Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not establish employment and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being struck
by the bi-fold door: a) Location: Worcester Academy: On or about December
9, 2015, three employee(s) using a scissor lift to repair the building trim
outside the center bi-fold door in the theater did not affix lockout devices or
otherwise disable the door to prevent unexpected or unintentional operation
of the door. Among other methods, one feasible and reasonable method to
correct this hazard would be to implement and enforce the American National
Standards Institute's standard for personnel protection-lockout/tagout of
energy sources-minimum safety requirements as specified in ANSI Z244.1-
2003(R2014). IN THE ALTERNATIVE: 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or
tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized
employees: a) Location: Worcester Academy: On or about December 9, 2015,
employee(s) using a scissor lift to repair the building trim outside the center
bi-fold door in the theater did not lockout or otherwise disable the bi-fold
door to prevent unexpected or unintentional operation of the door.
Oct 2017
February 2015
• “Upon arrival, it appeared
that a mechanic was
repairing the brake system
on a commercial truck and
trailer, when the safety
devices failed, causing the
trailer to back over the
mechanic,” the sheriff’s
office said in a late
afternoon press release.
Prevention?
The Need for LOTO
• No national are data available on the number of
fatalities due to contact with uncontrolled hazardous
energy.
• FACE Program: During 1982-1997, NIOSH
investigated 1,281 fatalities.
• 152 involved installation, maintenance, service, or
repair tasks on or near machines, equipment,
processes, or systems.
1979
• December 11
• Northbrook, IL
• Frank Heinrich was killed in an
industrial accident on the
premises of his employer when a
San-Dee Building Maintenance
Company employee activated a
trash compactor while Heinrich
was inside it, causing his death
• $300
• 5(a)(1)
• IL Supreme Court June 29, 1987.
Large trash compactor
The Need for LOTO
• UAW study [1997]: 83 of 414
fatalities among members
between 1973 and 1995 were
due to lockout/tagout
procedures.
January 2015
• A 50-year-old temporary
worker was permanently
disabled after a machine
used to package cases of
bottled water onto a pallet
for shipment started up
while he cleared a jam in
the machine.
• The worker had been on
the job for 12 days at the
Ice River Springs plant in
High Springs, FL.
Is there anything that could jam at
your place?
September 2014
• “There was one male who
was working at this metal
shredding company where
they were bailing what I
believe was metal and in
the process I guess the
machine malfunctioned.
• He went to fix the
malfunction and in the
process the machine
activated and he lost his
life,”
Could the water mixer activate like this?
Exercise
• May 2014
• Paterson, NJ
• After entering a die cutting
machine to do
maintenance, a worker
employed for 26 years at
was crushed when the die
cutter was activated by
another employee unaware
that the victim was inside.
CNC die cutting machine
What places could you be in
and others are unaware you
are in the equipment?
The Need for LOTO
Large injection
molding press
Headlines May 2014
• Company ‘willfully ignored’
safety standards in worker’s
death
• Daniel Collazo (left) was nearly
done with his shift cleaning
machines when other workers
heard his screams.
• Collazo had become caught in the
rotating screws that blend the
hummus and struggled to free
himself as slowly-winding 9-inch
blades kept turning, crushing his
arms and part of his head.
The company paid a $540,000 fine to
the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration following Collazo’s
death in 2011.
Lockout/Tagout
Session 2: Purpose & Scope of Standard
Core Components of an Energy
Control Program
• The employer shall
establish a program
consisting of:
• Energy control procedures,
• Employee training and
• Periodic rendered
inoperative.
Written Programs
• Each state consultation has a
sample program.
• Many are online.
OSHA Nov 2017
• “I’ve seen many images like this
of collaborative robot interactions
that give potential users a false
sense of security.
• ANSI-RIA conformance is no
simple matter there are countless
safety considerations, risk
assessment and validation
measures that are still catching
up to this technology.”
1910.147(a)(1) Scope
• Normal operation is
covered in 1910
Subpart O
• What is Subpart O?
Machine Guarding
• Another example involves adjustments to a printing press while it
is printing.
• The preamble explains that correcting for paper misalignments
using remote control devices is part of the production process,
and is subject to the machine guarding requirements.
• https://www.dol.gov/sol/media/briefs/dayton-10-01-2011.htm
1910.147(a)(3) Purpose
Employers are required to
establish a written program
to:
• affix lockout or tagout
devices to energy isolating
devices
• disable machines or
equipment to prevent
unexpected energization,
start up, or release of
stored energy.
OSHA GM
• “Plain language of lockout/tagout
standard unambiguously renders
it inapplicable when employee is
alerted or warned about
reactivation of machine, given
that term ‘unexpected’ connotes
element of surprise, and there
can be no surprise if employee is
given notice that machine is
being activated.”
• US Court of Appeals - 1996
Jams
• Printing presses may jam, requiring
an employee to bypass the
machine guards in order to reach
the area of the jam and clear it.
• Although the need to unjam the
machine arises during normal
production operations, it is a
servicing activity that involves
employee exposure to unexpected
activation of the machine or
release of energy, and is covered
under the Lockout/Tagout
standard.
• https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/lot
otraining/hottopics/ht-relche-1-
4.html
Unjamming
• Under no circumstances is any
part of an employee’s body ever
permitted to be exposed within a
hazardous area, such as the point
of operation or in-going nip point
area, during servicing and/or
maintenance activities while the
machine is running or energized.
• https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive
_pdf/CPL_02-00-147.pdf
1910.147(a)(1)(ii) Exemptions
• Construction, agriculture
and maritime employment;
• Electrical Utilities;
• Electrical equipment
(covered by Subpart S)
• Oil and gas well drilling and
servicing
1910.147(a)(2) Application
• Service and maintenance:
– Employee required to remove or bypass a guard or safety
device
– Employee required to place part of body into area that would
be a danger zone during machine operation cycle
OSHRC GM
• The standard [does not apply] to
servicing and maintenance that
presents minimal and readily
controlled risk . . . .
• [E]ach covered employer’s burden
is determined by the frequency
and complexity of servicing
actually undertaken. . . .
• Machines and equipment that
present no hazard are excluded
from coverage.
OSHRC GM
• Parry testified that once
that gate was opened or an
emergency stop button was
hit, there could be no
startup of any equipment
until another time-
consuming, multi-step
startup procedure was
completed, which
inevitably would alert the
servicing or maintenance
employee.
“Employee could not have
followed proper procedures
and must have entered the
machine area without using the
interlocked barrier gate as
required.”
1910.147(a)(2) Application:
The lockout standard does not
apply to work performed with
electronic equipment that is
connected to its energy source
by a cord and plug.
Exposure to this type of hazard is
controlled by the worker, who
isolates out the equipment by
unplugging it before the
servicing or maintenance and
maintains exclusive control over
the plug.
1910.147(a)(2) Application
• Does not apply to hot tap
operations in transmission and
distribution operations in
pressurized pipelines provided
that:
– Continuity of service is
essential,
– Shutdown of system is
impractical, and
– Documented procedures
and special equipment
provide proven effective
protection for employees
1910.147 LOTO
Control of Hazardous Energy
Authorized Employees – perform LOTO
1910.333 Electrical LOTO
Qualified Employees – perform LOTO
Employers covering electrical work under the 1910.147 LOTO
Program are encouraged to continue to do so. However those
workers need to have additional training and the PPE required for
1910.333(b)(2)(iv).
Compliance with 1910.331-.335 OSHA’s ESRWP & NFPA 70E
Employees must be “qualified” in addition to “authorized”
1910.147 LOTO
Control of Hazardous
Energy
(Hydraulic, Electrical etc.)
1910.333 Electrical LOTO
Shock, burns, fire,
explosion, etc
3 main elements required:
1. Specific documented
procedures
1. Photocopy of the
1910.333(b) is all that is
needed for documented
procedures
2. Training 2. Training per 1910.332 &
NFPA 70E – Qualified
Employee
3. Periodic Inspections 3. No “periodic
inspections” required
Jan 2017
Many injuries without the specific procedures needed by 1910.147
May 2014
• Milford, IL
• 3 willful at $70,000 each.
• The worker was clearing
birdseed from a large
industrial mixing tank.
• The worker’s left hand and
arm were crushed after
being caught in the moving
parts of the mixing machine.
• 147(c)(6)(i)
• 147(c)(7)(i)
• 147(d)(4)(i)
The subsequent investigation
determined Wagner’s failed to
lock out energy sources, which
would have protected the worker
from contact with rotating
components of the machine.
147(c)(6)(i)
• The employer shall
conduct a periodic
inspection of the energy
control procedure at
least annually to ensure
that the procedure and
the requirements of this
standard are being
followed.
147(c)(7)(i)
• The employer shall provide
training to ensure that the
purpose and function of the
energy control program are
understood by employees
and that the knowledge and
skills required for the safe
application, usage, and
removal of the energy
controls are acquired by
employees.
147(d)(4)(i)
• Lockout or tagout
devices shall be affixed
to each energy isolating
device by authorized
employees.
What is missing?
Removal
• 1) The use of a master key to remove a
lockout device would be deemed
equivalent (to the removal of the lock by
the person who applied it) only if it is
performed under the employer's
direction and in accordance with the
requirements established in
1910.147(e)(3)
• https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2000-02-28
Removal
• Specific procedures and training for such
removal have been developed,
documented and incorporated into the
employer's energy control program.
• Verification by the employer that the
authorized employee who applied the
device is not at the facility:
• Making all reasonable efforts to contact
the authorized employee to inform
him/her that his/her lockout or tagout
device has been removed; and
• Ensuring that the authorized employee
has this knowledge before he/she
resumes work at that facility.
Scope
LOTO covers the servicing and
maintenance of machines
and equipment to prevent
injury to workers from:
• unexpected energization or
startup of the machines or
equipment;
• release of stored energy.
How is stored air released
for compressor?
Servicing and Maintenance
Is there a potential for injury
from unexpected startup or
release of stored energy?
Normal production
operations are not taking
place.
Lockout/Tagout:
Minor Servicing Exception
Minor Servicing Exception
• §1910.147(a)(2)(ii) note.
• Minor servicing activities, which take
place during normal production
operations and which are routine,
repetitive, and integral to the use of
machine/equipment for production,
are not covered by the LOTO standard
if alternative methods provide
effective employee protection from
hazards associated with the control of
hazardous energy (e.g., unexpected
start-up).
• Compliance with the machine guarding
requirements of Subpart O is an
example of such alternative measures.
https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-147.pdf
Minor Servicing Exception
• Minor tool changes and adjustments, and
other minor servicing activities that take place
during normal production operations, are not
covered by the Lockout/Tagout standard.
• Three specific criteria can be used to
determine if the minor servicing exception
would apply to a particular activity.
• ALL THREE criteria must be met; otherwise
the Lockout/Tagout standard is applicable and
the machine or equipment must be
deenergized and all potentially hazardous
energy rendered safe.
Criteria #1
The activity must be conducted
during normal production
operations, i.e., while the machine
or equipment is actually performing
its intended production function.
Criteria #2
The activity must be:
• Routine: The activity must be a
regular course of procedure and be
in accordance with established
practices.
• Repetitive: The activity must be
regularly repeated as part of the
production process.
• Integral: The activity must be
essential to the production process.
Criteria #3
Employer must use alternative measures
to provide effective protection from the
hazardous energy, such as:
• specially designed tools,
• remote devices,
• interlocked barrier guards,
• local disconnects,
• or control switches which are under
the exclusive control of the employee
performing the minor servicing.
Using an extension tool to
prevent employee injury.
Effectiveness of Alternative Measures
• A CSHO should consider all of the steps taken
by an employer to provide alternative,
effective protection (e.g., training,
disciplinary provisions, engineering controls,
start-up alarms/delays, administrative
provisions, near miss and related-injury data,
etc.) in order to ascertain whether the
alternative, including all of its steps, reliably
prevents an employee from being injured by
hazardous energy when performing servicing
and maintenance activities under the “minor
servicing” exception.
Exception to LOTO
• Definition of Set-up – Any work to prepare a machine to
perform its normal production operation.
• By definition, set-up activities can’t take place during normal
production, so LOTO applies.
What hazards are
there during set of the
lathe?
Example - Not Meeting Exception
• Same machine: the mold
opened up too soon, the
plastic part melts in the
mold, and doesn’t fall.
• Now someone has to go
between mold with hand
tools to pry and scrape off
the material.
• This is not routine or
repetitive; it is done only as
needed, so LOTO would
apply.
Inch Jog
• Inch and jog devices have been included in
the design of machines or equipment in order
to safely perform set-up and to address
maintenance problems associated with the
straightening or feeding of material through
their processes.
• The use of properly designed and applied
control circuitry (such as the use of two hand
activation controls that are designed to
control reliability standards and are mounted
at a predetermined safety distance from the
danger zone) for the testing or positioning of
machine/equipment components, in
conjunction with LOTO, prevent employee
exposure to the hazard associated with the
movement of machine/equipment
components.
• OSHA CPL 2003
Push Buttons
Seven (7) situations can cause unexpected motor
energization or startup if this control circuit method is
used:
a. Another employee enters the motor controller (motor
starter) enclosure and manually closes the relay;
b. A malfunction of the push button;
c. A relay or motor controller failure (e.g., defective spring;
welded contacts). For example, a machine jam occurs
causing higher current in the motor circuit, resulting in the
freeze-up of the controller relay contact parts because the
current creates arcing, which in turn welds shut the relay's
plunger-coil mechanism.
This could be particularly hazardous if an employee is
relying on control circuits to clear jams as the energized
machine could start up and injure the employee;
Seven (7) situations can cause unexpected motor
energization or startup if this control circuit method is
used:
d. A loose wire contacts the conduit or enclosure;
e. Two wires short out inside a damaged conduit (e.g.,
vibration causes wires to rub and wear through the
wire’s insulation resulting in an electric short and
bridging of the control circuit);
f. Water, dirt, metal particles or other conductive foreign
debris enters the control circuit enclosure causing the
switch to operate because the material sufficiently
bridges and closes the circuit, allowing current flow; or
g. Ice, grease, dirt, wood, metal particles or other debris
causes a push type control mechanism to stick in the
closed position, allowing current to flow.
OSHA CPL 2003
Push Buttons cont.
Automated Palletizer
• Operator goes inside
this interlocked gate
to perform minor
servicing, but goes on
the back side out of
sight.
Is this effective
protection?
interlocked gates
LOTO Overview
Lockout/tagout program consists of:
a) survey of all hazardous energy
b) identifying energy-isolating devices
c) selecting and procuring protective materials and hardware
d) assigning duties and responsibilities
e) determining shut-down, de-energization, energization and
start-up sequences
f) written procedures for machines, equipment, and processes
g) training of personnel
h) auditing program elements
EXERCISE
• What is hazardous energy?
• List all Energy sources
Some machines like this plastic injection molder station might have multiple
sources of energy.
Blocking
Die Blocks
Cleaning - Conveyor
• The operator’s assistant wanted to
clean the build-up from the Doser
Conveyor.
• This process uses a high-pressure water
cleaner while the conveyor is in
position and in operational mode.
• His right arm was torn from his torso
from the shoulder.
• A section of guard near the tail drum
had been removed and placed against a
wall.
• A shirt was tightly wrapped around
the axle on one side of the tail drum
• Soft mud was moved from 2 locations
around the tail drum.
• Conveyor was not turned off or
isolated.
Tail Drum
Cleaning - Meat Grinder
• A 15-year-old worker at a
retail grocery store suffered
amputation of the right
arm.
• He was caught by the auger
of a meat grinder.
• The victim was
reassembling parts of a
grinder he had cleaned
without de-energizing and
locking out the machine's
power supply.
Cleaning - Meat Grinder
(continued)
• He inserted the auger into the
grinder's housing and reached
through the feed-throat with his
right hand to guide it into
engagement.
• He bumped against the on/off
switch.
• The grinder started, and the
auger pulled his hand and arm
into the housing.
Control Reliability• Control reliability is generally
considered safety Category-3
or -4 as defined in ISO 13849-
1/ EN954-1 Standard for all
types of circuits.
• This ISO standard regarding
Category-3 states” a single
fault in any of these parts
does not lead to the loss of
the safety function” and that
“a fault shall be detected at
or before the next demand
upon the safety function.”
• And for Category-4, “an
accumulation of undetected
faults shall not lead to the
loss of the safety function.”
Control Reliability
• Two general abnormal conditions can affect valve safety.
• The first is similar to an electrical-control fault, such as
when a relay might be stuck in the open or closed
position.
Control Reliability
• The second abnormal
condition is when a valve
develops diminished
performance, as when a
valve becomes sticky or
sluggish.
• In these cases the valve
reaches the proper
position, but slower
shifting affects safe
stopping distances or
precise timing.
Control Reliability
• The ANSI B11.19- 2003 Standard mandates a monitoring
system that detects these conditions for critical applications
and the ANSI/ PMMI B155.1 standard requires diminished
performance monitoring if stopping time can be affected.
• An easy solution is to use a self-monitoring, Category-3 or -
4 valve, designed to detect both conditions.
De-energized
• Disconnected from all energy sources and not
containing residual or stored energy (isolation).
Energized
• Connected to an energy source OR
• Containing residual or stored energy.
Momentum - Energy
Procedures may require waiting for motion to stop on some machines.
Bull Gears Flywheels
Inspecting - Press
An engineer was
looking at why paper
backing was not
feeding into a press.
His head was caught
between press and
paper roll.
Paper Roll
Jam Clearing
• Many temporary
employees get hurt or
killed when clearing jams.
• Many times machines
start up when a jam is
cleared.
• Lockout is required to
prevent re-energization. A horizontal shaft could restart
once a jam is cleared. Lockout is
required. The shaft needs to be
guarded.
Servicing and Maintenance
– Constructing
– Maintaining and/or servicing
– Installing and setting up
– Adjusting, inspecting,
modifying
– Lubricating, cleaning or un-
jamming
– Tool changes
Note: LOTO applies to all workers
performing these tasks,
regardless of their job titles.
Servicing - Polishing Machine
• 18-year-old employee, had
worked for 2 months.
• Polishing machine stopped.
• He went behind the machine.
• He opened the guard to see if
one of the empty polishing
holders would spin freely.
• He had his hand in there and
hit the start switch.
• The polishers began to spin at
a little over 1,000 rpm.
• What about the guard?
Setup – Die Cutter
• Woman was caught in a die-
cutting machine that she used to
cut graphic art products.
• The woman was pregnant; she
suffered massive head and chest
trauma and lost her baby.
• The company attorney said the
machine had been turned off.
• The woman was preparing her
next job - cutting a sign - and
was far from the control
buttons.
• The machine moved enough to
trap her.[Not actual machine]
Energy Isolating Device- Lines
• Isolation procedures
– Blanking/blinding
– Double block and bleed
– Line breaking
Tank with lines
entering it
Is the line or vessel de-
pressurized?
Setup - Die Changing
• Worker hopes that photo is
enough to convince someone to
lockout equipment.
• Worker was 20 at the time of the
injury, thought he was
“indestructible.”
• He did not follow instructions for
changing out dies.
• Photo was taken on last day of
rehab, a constant reminder of his
mistake.
• Worker is in pain and preparing
for “very early retirement.”
Stored Energy:
Release, Block, or Otherwise Rendered Safe
• Discharge capacitors
• Block or release
springs
• Relieve system
pressure
• Drain fluids
• Vent gases
• Allow system to cool
(or use PPE)
• Allow momentum of
mechanical motion to
stop
Note: some energy sources
have to be addressed by other
means.
Tagout
• Placement of tagout device
– on an energy isolating device,
– in accordance with an
established procedure,
– to indicate that energy
isolating device and
equipment being controlled
may not be operated until
tagout device is removed.
Trapped Key Interlock
Nucor Trapped Key Variance
1. Modified the electrical controls
2. Installed a trapped key control system
3. Job hazard analysis for roll grinding
- documented an electrical isolation
analysis,
- system and functional safety reviews,
- control reliability analysis
4. Locking the trapped key to the lock box
in the pulpit area inside a
secondary group lock box installed on the
roll mill floor
5. Developed detailed administrative
energy control procedures
6. Implemented detailed administrative
energy control procedures
7. Procured equipment and supplies;
8. English and Spanish for
procedures;
9. Trained authorized and affected
10. Grinding on the passes is
conducted only while using the
administrative energy control
procedures based on the trapped key
system;
11. Installed guarding
12. Minimize the potential for
authorized and affected employees
to enter between the mill stands
when harm could occur; and
13. Designated and posted the areas
as "No Entry"
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_RE
GISTER&p_id=26252 04/08/2016
Work CellsKinetic (mechanical)
energy in the moving
parts of mechanical
systems.
Energy Control Program
• 1910.147(c)(1)
• Written
• Energy control
procedures for each
type of machine
• Training and retraining
to ensure employees
understand the
program
• Periodic inspection to
ensure procedures are
being followed
• Application of energy
controls
1910.147(c)(2)(ii)
• If an energy isolating device is capable of
being locked out, the employer's energy
control program shall utilize lockout.
Pumps
• Rack out breakers
Pump Panel
Pump Gauges
How do you know if they
are de-energized?
Pump Gauges
Pump Lockout
Provide LOTO devices
• A lockout board for employees
Lockout Tags
• Paper tag .
• Not 50 lbs strength.
• Not weather-resistant.
1910.147(c)(3)
Full employee protection
The employer must
demonstrate that the a
tagout system will provide
full employee protection.
Usually OSHA will not
accept tagout.
Feb 2018
What else needs to be done?
1910.147(c)(2)(iii)
• Energy isolating devices
designed to accept lockout
devices whenever:
– Replacement or major repair,
renovation or modification of
equipment is performed, or
– New machines or equipment
are installed.
Session 3:
Energy Control Procedures
Employers must develop and document
machine-specific procedures to control
potentially hazardous energy.
1910.147(c)(4)
Energy control
procedure
• Procedures shall be
developed, documented
and utilized for the control
of potentially hazardous
energy when employees are
engaged in the activities
covered by this section.
• Called Specific Procedures
by OSHA.
1910.147(c)(4)
Energy control procedure
• Outline scope, purpose, authorization, rules, techniques
for control of hazardous energy, including:
– Specific intended use of the procedure;
– Specific steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking
and securing equipment;
– Specific steps for placement, removal, transfer of
lockout/tagout devices and responsibility for them;
– Specific requirements for testing equipment to verify
effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and
other energy control measures.
Application of the Energy
Control Procedure
(in order)
1. Prepare for shutdown
2. Shut down equipment
3. Isolate all energy sources
4. Apply locks & tags
5. Release stored energy
6. Verify equipment isolation
7. Perform the task
8. Release from Lockout
What is wrong?
Step 1: Prepare for Shutdown
• Understand equipment hazards
Before an authorized or affected employee
turns off a machine or equipment, the
authorized employee shall know the type and
magnitude of the energy, the hazards, and the
means to control it.
• Notify other workers
Step 2: Shut Down
Equipment
• Use the normal
shutdown procedures
• Turn all switches to
OFF/Neutral
Step 3: Isolate all Energy Sources
Use energy isolation
devices to prevent
transmission or release
of energy.
Step 4: Apply Locks & Tags
Apply locks and tags to:
• Valves
• Breakers/electrical
disconnects
• Mechanical blocks
Valve lockout device
Step 5:
Release or Block all Stored Energy
• Block/disconnect
lines
• Block or release
springs
• Block elevated parts
• Relieve system
pressure
• Drain fluids
• Vent gases
• Allow system to cool
(or use PPE)
• Apply any additional
locks and tags
Step 6: Verify Equipment Isolation
• Check that other workers are
clear of potential hazards
• Check that locking devices are
secure
• Attempt normal startup
• Return control to OFF/Neutral
Controls to verify
energy isolation
Step 7: Perform the Task
• Perform
maintenance
or service.
Step 8: Release from Lockout
• Ensure machinery is properly assembled and
all tools removed.
• Ensure that employees are outside of danger
zones and are notified that devices are being
removed.
• Remove LOTO devices
–Must be removed by authorized employee
who applied it.
Exercise
Specific
Procedures
• Many are
pictures
orientation so
use for lockout
procedures.
Specific Procedure Example
• Shutdown the Mixer at the
button.
• Verify that all moving parts have
stopped.
• Lock and tag the knife switch with
appropriate lockout devices. (Be
sure to use your own personal
locks with only one key for each
lock, which you hold.)
• Verify that the mixer is locked out
by pushing on the ON button and
seeing that mixer blades do not
move.
Worker locking out the mixer
Lockout Removal
• To test or reposition
machine/equipment.
• Following sequence must occur:
– Clear machine/equipment of
tools/materials
– Remove employees from area
– Remove Lockout devices
– Energize, test, or reposition
equipment
– De-energize, and reapply energy
control measures before servicing
Machine Guarding must be provided!
Every lock should have
an identifier for each
person locking out.
• Lockout?
Crane
Crane Lockout
• How?
Crane Lockout
1910.147(c)(5)
Protective materials
and hardware
• Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key
blocks, adapter pins, self-locking
fasteners, or other hardware shall
be provided by the employer for
isolating, securing or blocking of
equipment from energy sources.
1910.147(c)(5)
Protective materials and hardware
• Lockout and tagout devices must be:
– Singularly identified
– The only device(s) used for controlling
energy
– Not used for other purposes
– And shall meet the following
requirements:
1910.147(c)(5)
Protective materials and hardware
• Capable of withstanding environment for
maximum time period
• Moisture or corrosives must not make tag
deteriorate
• Standardized:
– Color
– Shape
– Size
– Print/Format
1910.147(c)(5)
Protective materials and hardware
• Lockout and tagout devices indicate identity of
employee applying devices.
Lockout
• Breaker lockout device
Lockout
• Valve lockout device
Lockout
• Gate valves locked out
Lockout
• Multiple locks on a hasp
Lockout
• Valve lockout device
Electrical Lockout Devices
Locked out electrical
panel
Locked out circuit breaker
Hasp for multiple locks
Group Lock Box
Simplifies lockout of large
equipment.
After machine or process is
locked out, keys are placed
in a lock box.
Each authorized work team
member places a personal
lock or tagout device to the
group lock box.
Fluid and Gas Lockout Devices
Valve Lockout
Improper Valve Lockout
• This photo illustrates the
air line that supplied the
debarker and is not
properly locked out
[courtesy of SCOSHA].
• The insert is a ball-valve
lockout device that can
be used to lock out the
pneumatic airline.
Close Call
• Other people became
involved with the refiner and
needed to lock out the same
breaker.
• They saw the hasp (multiple
lockout device) and placed
their locks on the hasp.
• The millwright was able to
take his lock off the breaker
and remove all other locks.
Pneumatic Valve Isolation Examples
Handle /lever
Note: Some are self-exhausting, but not all.
Piston
Gate Valve
Common Hydraulic Isolation
• Most pumps are
operated by electrical
motors.
• Open and lockout
disconnects for pump
motors.
Hydraulic pumps may be driven by
battery-powered motors, e.g., fork trucks.
Note: All stored energy
including accumulators
must also be relieved.
Disconnect
Valve Isolation
Distilled water line ball valve with
the valve handle perpendicular to
the pipe line (ball valve is closed).
Jaws of the safety lockout hasp pass
through the hole in the valve handle
and a hole fixed in the valve body.
2 padlock shackles (each with a
lockout danger tag) pass through
separate lockout points on the safety
lockout hasp (2 people working on
this task).
Pipe Isolation Examples
Blank Flange Breaking Line
Blocking Line
True “Double Block & Bleed”
PI
Double block and bleed:
method of process isolation
where there are two physical
barriers (valves, blinds, etc.) with
bleed off in between
Each barrier can be operated,
secured, and tested
independently.
Two valves in a series without
bleed-off in-between are counted
as a single valve (barrier).
Chemical
Piping Isolation
VacuBlast Cabinet w/Dust Extractor
• Type Magnitude
• Electrical 415 volts
• Pneumatic 100 psi
• Required Safety
Equipment
• Tagout Tag(s) (2)
• Interlocking Hasp(s) (2)
• Padlock(s) (2)
• Ball Valve Lockout(s)
(1)
Verify Equipment Isolation
• Check that other workers are
clear of hazards.
• Check that locking devices are
secure.
• Attempt normal startup.
• Return control to OFF/Neutral.
Controls to verify
energy isolation
Verification
• Testing circuitry, cycling, visually
inspecting position, manually
trying; monitoring movement or
discharge; observing bleeds,
gauges, indicators, etc; or other
available means.
• Use technique(s) with the best
degree of isolation assurance.
• Do not rely on pressure gages
alone to indicate pressure. They
are often inoperable.
Power Press – LOTO Procedure
Energy Sources:
• Electric motor drive-belt
drive
• Rotating flywheel –
momentum
• Ram/slide - gravity
• Air clutch – 90 PSI line
pressure
Disconnect
Motor
Power Press – LOTO Procedure
Energy Sources:
• Electric motor drive
• Rotating flywheel – momentum
• Ram/slide - gravity
• Air clutch
Procedure:
• Turn off machine and wait until flywheel stops
• Open disconnect and place lock
• Place block under ram
• Close air valve and place lock; listen for air to
bleed off
Verify:
• Try starting motor
• Observe die blocks in place
• Observe flywheel has stopped
• Observe air gage to read 0 pressure
Disconnect
Motor
Lockout Log
A written procedure should be established with a log to
track locations, time, employees and devices.
Session 4:
Required Training
• Authorized employees
– Recognition of hazardous energy sources
– Type and magnitude of energy in the workplace
– Methods for energy isolation / control
• Affected employees
– Purpose and use of energy control procedures
• Other employees in work area
– Procedures related to restarting machines
Training
● Workers clearing jam
need to lockout the
conveyor.
● The conveyor needs
an emergency stop,
guards for
belts/pulleys and
safety trip wires.
Required Training
Employees must be trained in
the following limitations of
tagout systems:
• Tags are warning devices and
do not provide the physical
restraint that is provided by a
lock.
• When a tag is attached to an
energy isolating means, it is
never to be removed without
authorization or ignored.
• Tags must be understandable by all
authorized employees, affected
employees, and all other employees
whose work operations are in the
area.
• Tags and their means of attachment
must be made of materials that will
withstand the environmental
conditions in the workplace.
• Tags may evoke a false sense of
security
• Tags must be securely attached to
energy-isolating devices so that they
cannot be detached during use.
Required Training (cont’d)
Retraining Requirements
Retraining is required in the
following cases:
– Change in job assignments
– Change in machines
– Change in energy control procedures
– Equipment or processes present new
hazards
– Inspections reveal deficiencies in
employee's knowledge of energy
control procedures
Retraining must reestablish
employee proficiency.
Sep 2018
Exercise
• Shaft
• Lockout issues?
• Other Issues?
Issue?
• Shaft lockout?
Cleaning Training
• Cleaning a machine is
not supposed to be a
hazard.
• Guards are in place to
prevent exposure to
hazardous motions.
• If guards must be
removed to clean,
lockout is required. Cleaning a conveyor is a common
source of death and amputations. This
conveyor does not have guards for the
rotation of the horizontal drive shafts.
Cleaning Training
Temps
• Maintenance locks for temp
cleaners is NOT acceptable.
• On December 16, 2011, a
28-year-old male temporary
worker (victim) was fatally
injured while cleaning and
sanitizing a double auger
screw conveyor machine
(feed pump skid).
Session 5:
Periodic Inspections
• 1910.147(c)(6)
• Performed at least annually.
• Conducted by authorized
employees.
• Intended to correct
inadequacies identified in
program.
• Certified.
Periodic Audits
• Machines where
procedures are used
• Date of inspection
• Employees included
in inspection
• Person who
performed
inspection
Audit Interpretation
• “Each energy control procedure
must be separately inspected at
least annually to ensure that the
energy control program is being
properly utilized.”
• March 9, 2004
Audit Interpretation
• “Grouping energy control
procedures for same or similar
machines or equipment for
inspection purposes may
streamline the inspection and
review process, since there will
be a smaller number of
procedure groups than individual
procedures. Thus, an employer
may elect to group procedures as
described above, and then
inspect a representative number
of such employees implementing
one procedure within each group.
“ • November 30, 2010
Audit Interpretation
• “ OSHA interprets this to mean that there must be a review between an
authorized employee designated by the employer as the "inspector"
and all other authorized employees (and all affected employee when
tagout is used to control energy) of the employee's responsibilities
under the periodic inspection being inspected.“
• June 20, 1996
Audit Interpretation
• The periodic inspection consists of two requirements.
• First, the inspector must observe a representative sample of
authorized employees performing the servicing and
maintenance operation using the lockout/tagout procedure.
• Second, the inspector must perform a review with each
authorized employee of that employee's responsibilities under
the energy control procedure being inspected.
• From OSHA Hot Topics - Lockout
Sep 2016
Sep 2016
Sep 2016
Sep 2016
Lockout Audits
• For lockout, it's important
for an authorized employee
to actually conduct the
procedure to demonstrate
that the procedure does
work.
• It's also important to test
the e-stops, although this is
better done at the end of
shift because it may be
difficult to get the
automation running again.
Lockout Audits
Audit lockout for new people right away vs waiting a year.
Lockout Audit
• Large Food Processor
• 700 workers
• 40 maintenance
• JSA with Specific
procedure.
• Every non-routine
maintenance is an audit.
Oct 2018
Sample Audit Results
• Lockout location info not
correct.
• Contractor padlock not
identified to who it was
protecting.
• PPE for lockout was not
correct for the hazard.
Nov 2018
• You’re a good man!
• Pay attention to the “forgotten
shifts”.
• We have had three fatalities and
over 12 amputations within the
last year on either 2nd or 3rd
shifts.
• Almost all of these companies
had LO/TO programs and training
but had not done any off shift
periodic inspections to verify
compliance.
• Please spread the word!
July 2013
• "Lockout the disconnect
at the knife switch on
the single pole behind
the machine."
• I looked behind the
machine.
• No disconnect.
• The closest disconnect
was to my right. I said I
would lock out this
knife switch.
Interpretation
• “Observing only a single
authorized employee
implementing each lockout
procedure, rather than a
representative number of
employees, also does not meet
the intent of the standard.”
• https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta
/lototraining/case/cs4-1y.html
Exercise
Session 6: Application of the
Energy Control Procedure
• When the authorized employee who applied the lockout or tagout device
is not available, that device may be removed under the direction of the
employer (if safety is not compromised).
• The specific procedure for removal in this situation includes:
Exception
(cont’d)
• The employer verifies that the
authorized employee who
applied the device is not at the
facility.
• The employer tries to contact
the authorized employee
(before he/she resumes work)
to tell him/her that the lockout
or tagout device has been
removed.
Additional Requirements
Testing or positioning of machines, equipment or components.
If lockout or tagout devices must be removed and the machine
or equipment energized to test or position the machine,
equipment or components, take these steps (in order):
Additional Requirements
(cont’d)
• Clear the machine or
equipment of tools and
materials in accordance with
paragraph (e)(1) of this
section;
• Remove employees from the
machine or equipment area
(e)(2);
• Remove the lockout or tagout
devices [paragraph (e)(3)].
• Energize and proceed with
testing or positioning;
• De-energize all systems and
reapply energy controls to
continue the servicing
and/or maintenance
[paragraph (d)].
Additional Requirements
(cont’d)
April 2016
Review 1
Review 1
Review 1
Review 1
Review 1
Who needs
training?
1910.332(a)
Employees in occupations listed
in Table S-4 face such a risk
and are required to be trained.
Other employees who also may
reasonably be expected to face
comparable risk of injury due to
electric shock or other electrical
hazards must also be trained.
 At a minimum, be trained in and familiar
with the following:
 The skills and techniques necessary to
distinguish exposed live parts from other
parts of electric equipment.
 The skills and techniques necessary to
determine the nominal voltage of exposed
live parts, and
 The clearance distances specified in
1910.333(c) and the corresponding
voltages to which the qualified person
will be exposed.
Table S4
➢ Blue collar supervisors
➢ Electrical and electronic
engineers
➢ Electrical and electronic
equipment assemblers
➢ Electrical and electronic
technicians
➢ Electricians
➢ Industrial machine operators
➢Material handling equipment
operators
Typical Occupational Categories of Employees Facing a
Higher Than Normal RIsk of Electrical Accident:
➢ Mechanics and repairers
➢ Painters
➢ Riggers and roustabouts
➢ Stationary engineers
➢ Welders
October 2015
1910.147(f)(2)
Outside Personnel
• Contractors and other
outside personnel:
– On-site employer and
outside employer inform
each other of lockout/tagout
procedures.
– On-site employer complies
with outside employer’s
energy control program.
1910.147(f)(3)
Group Lockout or Tagout
• Each authorized employee affixes personal
lockout/tagout device to group lockout device when
beginning work.
• Each removes personal device when stopping work
on this equipment.
Outside Contractors
• Must adhere to
standard’s
requirements.
• Must inform each
other of respective
program
responsibilities.
Shift Personnel
• Continuity must be
maintained for
orderly transfer.
• Helps minimize
exposure status, and
release of stored
energy.
December 2013
Voltage Detectors
• “Senses the steady state
electrostatic field produced
by AC voltage through
insulation without requiring
contact to the bare
conductor.
• A red glow at the tip and a
beeping noise (if not
switched OFF) indicates the
presence of voltage.” -
FLUKE
The detector will not work on DC.
Workers must test for the absence
of voltage.
AC Voltage Detectors
Source: Fluke
Read the safety limitations
from the tester mfr
•Worker died when shocked pulling out barrel fuse with pliers
•Electrical circuits must be locked out before doing any work on the
circuits if possible.
Fuse Pulling
Outdoor Signs
Worker found unconscious taking out electric receptacle while
still energized. Breakers were not locked out. No labels in panel.
Other Issues
• Orange disconnects for
the heaters
• Sticker
• Lockout?
Forklift
Vertical Bandsaw
Lathe
• Signs?
• Why do people go in?
Boiler
Boiler Valve Lockout
Color Coding
Compressor Shutoff
Compressor Air
Gauge
Pneumatic
Compressor
Food Packaging
• One finger amputation.
• Worker went to clear
jam.
• Caught in chain and
sprocket.
• Machine auto started.
• Lack of training.
Wire Drawing
• Severe injuries to
worker setting-up
equipment.
• Caught in wire
• Machine either auto
started or
malfunctioned.
• No lockout.
• Lack of training.
SIGCASE
• $207,450
• Worker cleaning
equipment in preparation
of set-up.
• Equipment not locked
out.
• Worker not trained.
• No specific procedures.
• 5 amputations.
Lockout
• Employee was fixing a
printing press without
de-energizing it.
• Each employee must
lockout if more than
one exposed.
Lockout
• Employee trying to
adjust machine while
running.
Permanent Out of Service
• Question: When equipment is placed in an "out of service" status for
business or production purposes (e.g., poor efficiency, recycled, sold, etc.)
and not related to servicing or maintenance, is the use of lockout/tagout
devices for this purpose a violation of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)?
• Reply: Yes. As you have stated in your letter, applying lockout/tagout
devices to equipment that was placed out of service for business or
production reasons would not ". . .preserve the integrity of the
Lockout/Tagout program." The preamble to the final rule states, at
54 Federal Register 36671 (Sept. 1, 1989): ". . . the sight of a distinctive
lock or tag will provide a constant message of the use that the device is
being put to and the restrictions which this device is intended to convey. If
lockout or tagout devices are used for other purposes they can lose their
significance in the workplace. For the energy control procedure to be
effective, these devices must have a single meaning to employees: 'Do not
energize the equipment when such a device is affixed to it.'"
November 2015
• This is an IMPROPERLY
wired disconnect
switch.
Exelon EEI and IBEW
• 2005 OSHRC
• The Secretary notes in her
brief that the core principle
of lockout is that each
employee who is potentially
exposed to hazardous energy
will have his own lockout or
tagout device attached to the
energy isolating device
during the servicing
operation and that the
equipment cannot be re-
energized until each
employee removes his own
lock or tag.
Court of Appeals
• OSHA expressly rejected “EEI[’s]
argument that the person removing a
lockout or tagout device need not be
the same as the person who placed
it,” and instead adopted the position
that “each employee must have the
assurance that the device is in his or
her control, and that it will not be
removed by anyone else except in an
emergency situation.”
Consensus Standards
• OSHA recognizes the valuable contributions of national
consensus standards, and in many respects, these
standards offer useful guidance for employers and
employees attempting to control hazardous energy.
• However, the OSH Act contemplates a distinction
between the national consensus standard process and
the process of OSHA rulemaking.
• While the former often produces information useful in
the latter, it is not automatically equivalent
• However, in several important respects, the ANSI
standard appears to sanction practices that may provide
less employee protection than that provided by
compliance with the relevant OSHA provisions.
Robots and Vision Scanners
Hazard Control Hierarchy
Examples:
• Eliminate pinch points (increase
clearance)
• Intrinsically safe (energy
containment)
• Automated material handling
(robots, conveyors, etc.)
• Redesign the process to eliminate
or reduce human interaction
• Reduced energy
• Substitute less hazardous chemicals
Risk Reduction Measure: Elimination or Substitution
Classification: Design Out
Influence on Risk Factors:
• Impact on overall risk (elimination)
by affecting severity and probability
of harm.
• May affect severity of harm,
frequency of exposure to the
hazard under consideration, and/or
the possibility of avoiding or
limiting harm depending on which
method of substitution is applied.
Hazard Control Hierarchy
Examples:
• Barriers
• Interlocks
• Presence sensing devices (light
curtains, safety mats, area scanners,
etc.)
• Two hand control and two-hand trip
devices
Risk Reduction Measure: Guards, Safeguarding Devices
Classification: Engineering Controls
Influence on Risk Factors:
• Greatest impact on the probability
of harm (Occurrence of hazardous
events under certain
circumstances)
• Minimal if any impact on severity
of harm
Hazard Control Hierarchy
Examples:
• Lights, beacons and strobes
• Computer warnings
• Signs and labels
• Beepers, horns and sirens
Risk Reduction Measure: Awareness Devices
Classification: Administrative Controls
Influence on Risk Factors:
• Potential impact on the probability
of harm (avoidance)
• No impact on severity of harm
Hazard Control Hierarchy
Examples:
• Safe work procedures
• Safety equipment inspections
• Training
• Lockout/Tagout/Verify
Risk Reduction Measure: Training and Procedures
Classification: Administrative Controls
Influence on Risk Factors:
• Potential impact on the probability
of harm (avoidance)
• No impact on severity of harm
Hazard Control Hierarchy
Examples:
• Safety glasses and face shields
• Ear plugs
• Gloves
• Protective footwear
• Respirators
Risk Reduction Measure: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Classification: Administrative Controls
Influence on Risk Factors:
• Potential impact on the probability
of harm (avoidance)
• No impact on severity of harm
Provisions for Alternative
Method Interruption
In situations in which alternative methods must be temporarily
discontinued so that the machine or equipment may be
energized to test or position the machine, equipment or
component thereof, the following sequence of actions shall be
followed:
• Clear the machine or equipment of tools and materials.
• Remove affected persons from the machine or equipment
area.
• Temporarily discontinue alternative methods.
• Provide a safe position for persons.
• Position the machine, equipment or process.
• Perform the task.
• When the hazardous energy is no longer needed, reapply the
alternative methods.
Evaluating Alternative Methods
In evaluating an alternative method to lockout or tagout,
the risk reduction measures that will comprise the
alternative method shall be identified. Based on current
analyses and best practices, alternative methods shall
consist of the following parameters as applicable:
Evaluating Alternative Methods
• practicability/justification analysis (clause 8.2.1)
• risk assessment based on the tasks being performed
(clause 8.2.2)
• industry best practices/methods (clause 8.2.3)
• architecture/structure (clause 8.2.4)
• using well-tried components (clause 8.2.5)
• using well-tried designs (clause 8.2.6)
• common cause failure (clause 8.2.7)
• fault tolerance (clause 8.2.8)
• exclusivity of control (clause 8.2.9)
• tamper resistance (clause 8.2.10)
• program to support (clause 8.2.11)
• procedures in place (clause 8.2.12)
• periodic checking and testing (clause 8.2.13)
• review by a qualified person (clause 8.2.14)
March 27, 2007
• OAKDALE, Calif. -- A worker at a
Hershey Co. chocolate factory lost her
arm when a machine she was
cleaning accidentally switched on,
according to the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration.
• Erica Domen, 32, of Modesto, was
cleaning a batter-sifting machine
when the accident occurred at
around 1:20 a.m. Saturday at the
company's Oakdale plant, about 15
miles northeast of Modesto, a
spokesman for the state division of
OSHA said.
Summary
• Machine safety is using lockout
and/or machine guarding.
• Every worker must know where
the hazards are on each machine
• You are either an authorized
employee who is given authority
to lockout or an affected
employee who cannot work on
the machines when trouble
occurs.
When a jam occurs, they must
have lockout or machine
guards. This food packing
machine has inadequate
guards that allow entry into
the point of operation.

7115 Lockout 2019

  • 1.
    Background • Classes: OSHA10/30 Hour, Incident Investigation, Confined Space, Excavation Safety, Cranes Signaling, Rigging Safety, Fall Protection, Scaffold Competent Person, Silica Competent Person, CHST Prep, Lockout, Machine Guarding, OSHA Recordkeeping, and Safety Management • Services: Mock OSHA Inspections, Site Safety Audits, Expert Witness, • Since 1987, he has trained over 50,000 people including OSHA compliance officers and Fortune 500 Clients in numerous areas of Safety and Health. 1 40 years working with top companies to achieve world class safety in their sector. 815-354-6853 johnanewquist@gmail.com
  • 2.
    Welcome • Fire/Power Outages •Restrooms/smoking • Breaks/lunches • Student Data Form • Participant List initial • DAILY sign-in • Attendance • 500 Trainers? • Introductions/What we want • Pretest/Test • OBJECTIVES
  • 3.
    Objectives • At theend of the training, the participants will be able to: • Explain the importance of energy control programs, procedures, training, audits and methods of controlling hazardous energy. • Locate and determine appropriate OSHA Lockout Standards, 3
  • 4.
    Topics • Hazards andincidents • Types of hazardous energy, • Detecting hazardous conditions, • Implementing control measures as they relate to the control of hazardous energy, • Developing and implementing energy control programs including written isolation procedures, • Training of authorized and affected employees, and • Periodic inspection of energy control procedures using the OSHA control of hazardous energy standard.
  • 5.
    Sep 2018 • Lastyear, federal OSHA conducted more than 3,500 inspections under the Amputations NEP, constituting more than 10% of all federal OSHA inspections. • It found about 7,800 violations and assessed more than $55 million in civil penalties.
  • 6.
    Control of HazardousEnergy 1910.147 Draft 3 16 2019
  • 7.
    Control of HazardousEnergy 1910.147 Lockout/Tagout Session 1: Definitions, Examining the Need for Lockout
  • 8.
    Definitions • Affected employee. •An employee whose job requires him/her to operate or use a machine or equipment on which servicing or maintenance is being performed under lockout or tagout, or whose job requires him/her to work in an area in which such servicing or maintenance is being performed.
  • 9.
    Affected • All employeeswho work in the area where the energy control procedure(s) are utilized need to know about the prohibition against attempting to restart or reenergize machines or equipment that is locked or tagged out.
  • 10.
    Definitions • Authorized employee. •A person who locks out or tags out machines or equipment in order to perform servicing or maintenance on that machine or equipment. • An affected employee becomes an authorized employee when that employee's duties include performing servicing or maintenance covered under this section.
  • 11.
    Authorized Needs to betrained in: • recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources in the workplace; • the type and magnitude of energy found in the workplace; • the means and methods of isolating and/or controlling the energy. Compactors have multiple energy sources that require lockout.
  • 12.
    Definitions • Capable ofbeing locked out. • An energy isolating device is capable of being locked out if it has a hasp or other means of attachment to which, or through which, a lock can be affixed, or it has a locking mechanism built into it. • Other energy isolating devices are capable of being locked out, if lockout can be achieved without the need to dismantle, rebuild, or replace the energy isolating device or permanently alter its energy control capability.
  • 13.
    Definitions • Energized. • Connectedto an energy source or containing residual or stored energy.
  • 14.
    Definitions • Energy isolatingdevice. • A mechanical device that physically prevents the transmission or release of energy. • Push buttons, selector switches and other control circuit type devices are not energy isolating devices.
  • 15.
    Energy Isolating Device Amechanical device that, when utilized or activated, physically prevents the transmission or release of energy, including but not limited to the following: 1. A manually operated electrical circuit breaker; 2. A disconnect switch; 3. A manually operated switch by which the conductors of a circuit can be disconnected from all ungrounded supply conductors, and, in addition, no pole can be operated independently; 4. A line valve, bolted blank flange and bolted slip blinds; 5. A block (e.g., a safety block); and 6. Any similar device used to block or isolate energy.
  • 16.
    Energy Source • Anysource of: – Electrical, – Mechanical, – Hydraulic, – Pneumatic, – Chemical, – Thermal, or – Other energy. What kind of energy did the rock have?
  • 17.
    What is hazardousenergy? Energy sources including: • Electrical • Mechanical - Kinetic • Hydraulic • Pneumatic • Chemical • Thermal • Gravity • Potential – pressure in vessels • Radiation • Other sources in machines and equipment
  • 18.
    Definitions • Energy source. •Any source of electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, chemical, thermal, or other energy.
  • 19.
    Definitions • Hot tap. •A procedure used in the repair, maintenance and services activities which involves welding on a piece of equipment (pipelines, vessels or tanks) under pressure, in order to install connections or appurtenances. • It is commonly used to replace or add sections of pipeline without the interruption of service for air, gas, water, steam, and petrochemical distribution systems. • This standard does not apply to the following: • Hot tap operations involving transmission and distribution systems for substances such as gas, steam, water or petroleum products when they are performed on pressurized pipelines, provided that the employer demonstrates that- • continuity of service is essential; • shutdown of the system is impractical; and • documented procedures are followed, and special equipment is used which will provide proven effective protection for employees.
  • 20.
    Definitions • Lockout. • Theplacement of a lockout device on an energy isolating device, in accordance with an established procedure, ensuring that the energy isolating device and the equipment being controlled cannot be operated until the lockout device is removed.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Lockout Device • Adevice that uses a positive means such as a lock, either key or combination type, to hold an energy-isolating device in the safe position and prevent the energizing of a machine or equipment.
  • 23.
    Definitions • Lockout device. •A device that utilizes a positive means such as a lock, either key or combination type, to hold an energy isolating device in the safe position and prevent the energizing of a machine or equipment. • Included are blank flanges and bolted slip blinds. blank flanges slip blinds
  • 24.
    Energy Isolating Device:Lines • Isolation procedures – Blanking/blinding – Double block and bleed – Line breaking Tank with lines entering it Is the line or vessel de-pressurized?
  • 25.
    Definitions • Normal productionoperations. • The utilization of a machine or equipment to perform its intended production function.
  • 26.
    Definitions • Servicing and/ormaintenance. • Workplace activities such as constructing, installing, setting up, adjusting, inspecting, modifying, and maintaining and/or servicing machines or equipment. • These activities include lubrication, cleaning or unjamming of machines or equipment and making adjustments or tool changes, where the employee may be exposed to the unexpected energization or startup of the equipment or release of hazardous energy.
  • 27.
    Definitions • Setting up. •Any work performed to prepare a machine or equipment to perform its normal production operation.
  • 28.
    Definitions • Tagout. • Theplacement of a tagout device on an energy isolating device, in accordance with an established procedure, to indicate that the energy isolating device and the equipment being controlled may not be operated until the tagout device is removed.
  • 29.
    Definitions • Tagout device. •A prominent warning device, such as a tag and a means of attachment, which can be securely fastened to an energy isolating device in accordance with an established procedure, to indicate that the energy isolating device and the equipment being controlled may not be operated until the tagout device is removed.
  • 30.
    The Need forLOTO • OSHA: failure to control energy accounts for nearly 10 percent of serious incidents. • Case Studies from the NIOSH report: Guidelines for Controlling Hazardous Energy During Maintenance and Servicing reports the following: Pasta machine
  • 31.
    May 2014 • A17-year-old has the ability to move his right arm again, thanks to surgery performed at Massachusetts General Hospital. • Brett Bouchard severed his arm just below the elbow while cleaning a pasta machine at work.
  • 32.
    June 2016 • ColumbusWI • The teen was working at the factory on June 27, 2016 when he was pinned in a machine while cleaning scrap from underneath a laser cutter in operation. • He later died of his injuries on July 2, 2016. • The teen had only been working there two weeks when the incident happened. This IS my sister-in-law's nephew !!! Killed at 17 ... all because of company not following safety rules, providing proper training and equipment to ensure lockout/tagout - DA
  • 33.
    OSHA Oct 2016 •“We are swamped with AMPUTATIONS” • Aurora saw about 100-115 amputations in 2016. • Inspection is about 40%. • Many during setup with machine energized. • They inspect those with failure of machine guarding or lockout. • The minor servicing exemption comes into play.
  • 34.
    Oct 2018 • A61-year-old man was killed Friday after being pulled into a moving HVAC fan while working at the AAM Casting manufacturing plant in Wauwatosa. 34
  • 35.
    Exercise • “A worker’sfirst day at work shouldn’t be his last day on earth,” was OSHA chief David Michaels’ reaction to the work- related death of Lawrence Daquan “Day” Davis. • The 21-year old was crushed in a palletizer machine on August 16, 2012 at the Bacardi Bottling facility in Jacksonville, FL. • Davis was a temp worker hired by Remedy Intelligent Staffing. It was his first day on assignment to the Bacardi plant. What Standards? Find a 147 c 4, 6, 7 standard
  • 36.
  • 37.
    July 2016 • Behrsentenced to probation, $350K restitution in South Beloit plant worker's death
  • 38.
    Aug 2015 • BumbleBee Foods and two managers were charged by Los Angeles prosecutors Monday with violating safety regulations in the death of a worker who was cooked in an industrial oven with tons of tuna. • Bumble Bee Foods will pay $6 million for “willfully violating worker safety rules,” according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office. • $1.5 Million to the worker’s family
  • 39.
    Issue? • What wouldkill these workers?
  • 40.
    Aug 2016 • Section5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not establish employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being struck by the bi-fold door: a) Location: Worcester Academy: On or about December 9, 2015, three employee(s) using a scissor lift to repair the building trim outside the center bi-fold door in the theater did not affix lockout devices or otherwise disable the door to prevent unexpected or unintentional operation of the door. Among other methods, one feasible and reasonable method to correct this hazard would be to implement and enforce the American National Standards Institute's standard for personnel protection-lockout/tagout of energy sources-minimum safety requirements as specified in ANSI Z244.1- 2003(R2014). IN THE ALTERNATIVE: 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: a) Location: Worcester Academy: On or about December 9, 2015, employee(s) using a scissor lift to repair the building trim outside the center bi-fold door in the theater did not lockout or otherwise disable the bi-fold door to prevent unexpected or unintentional operation of the door.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    February 2015 • “Uponarrival, it appeared that a mechanic was repairing the brake system on a commercial truck and trailer, when the safety devices failed, causing the trailer to back over the mechanic,” the sheriff’s office said in a late afternoon press release. Prevention?
  • 43.
    The Need forLOTO • No national are data available on the number of fatalities due to contact with uncontrolled hazardous energy. • FACE Program: During 1982-1997, NIOSH investigated 1,281 fatalities. • 152 involved installation, maintenance, service, or repair tasks on or near machines, equipment, processes, or systems.
  • 44.
    1979 • December 11 •Northbrook, IL • Frank Heinrich was killed in an industrial accident on the premises of his employer when a San-Dee Building Maintenance Company employee activated a trash compactor while Heinrich was inside it, causing his death • $300 • 5(a)(1) • IL Supreme Court June 29, 1987. Large trash compactor
  • 45.
    The Need forLOTO • UAW study [1997]: 83 of 414 fatalities among members between 1973 and 1995 were due to lockout/tagout procedures.
  • 46.
    January 2015 • A50-year-old temporary worker was permanently disabled after a machine used to package cases of bottled water onto a pallet for shipment started up while he cleared a jam in the machine. • The worker had been on the job for 12 days at the Ice River Springs plant in High Springs, FL. Is there anything that could jam at your place?
  • 47.
    September 2014 • “Therewas one male who was working at this metal shredding company where they were bailing what I believe was metal and in the process I guess the machine malfunctioned. • He went to fix the malfunction and in the process the machine activated and he lost his life,” Could the water mixer activate like this?
  • 48.
    Exercise • May 2014 •Paterson, NJ • After entering a die cutting machine to do maintenance, a worker employed for 26 years at was crushed when the die cutter was activated by another employee unaware that the victim was inside. CNC die cutting machine What places could you be in and others are unaware you are in the equipment?
  • 49.
    The Need forLOTO Large injection molding press
  • 50.
    Headlines May 2014 •Company ‘willfully ignored’ safety standards in worker’s death • Daniel Collazo (left) was nearly done with his shift cleaning machines when other workers heard his screams. • Collazo had become caught in the rotating screws that blend the hummus and struggled to free himself as slowly-winding 9-inch blades kept turning, crushing his arms and part of his head. The company paid a $540,000 fine to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration following Collazo’s death in 2011.
  • 51.
  • 52.
    Core Components ofan Energy Control Program • The employer shall establish a program consisting of: • Energy control procedures, • Employee training and • Periodic rendered inoperative.
  • 53.
    Written Programs • Eachstate consultation has a sample program. • Many are online.
  • 54.
    OSHA Nov 2017 •“I’ve seen many images like this of collaborative robot interactions that give potential users a false sense of security. • ANSI-RIA conformance is no simple matter there are countless safety considerations, risk assessment and validation measures that are still catching up to this technology.”
  • 55.
    1910.147(a)(1) Scope • Normaloperation is covered in 1910 Subpart O • What is Subpart O?
  • 58.
    Machine Guarding • Anotherexample involves adjustments to a printing press while it is printing. • The preamble explains that correcting for paper misalignments using remote control devices is part of the production process, and is subject to the machine guarding requirements. • https://www.dol.gov/sol/media/briefs/dayton-10-01-2011.htm
  • 59.
    1910.147(a)(3) Purpose Employers arerequired to establish a written program to: • affix lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices • disable machines or equipment to prevent unexpected energization, start up, or release of stored energy.
  • 60.
    OSHA GM • “Plainlanguage of lockout/tagout standard unambiguously renders it inapplicable when employee is alerted or warned about reactivation of machine, given that term ‘unexpected’ connotes element of surprise, and there can be no surprise if employee is given notice that machine is being activated.” • US Court of Appeals - 1996
  • 61.
    Jams • Printing pressesmay jam, requiring an employee to bypass the machine guards in order to reach the area of the jam and clear it. • Although the need to unjam the machine arises during normal production operations, it is a servicing activity that involves employee exposure to unexpected activation of the machine or release of energy, and is covered under the Lockout/Tagout standard. • https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/lot otraining/hottopics/ht-relche-1- 4.html
  • 62.
    Unjamming • Under nocircumstances is any part of an employee’s body ever permitted to be exposed within a hazardous area, such as the point of operation or in-going nip point area, during servicing and/or maintenance activities while the machine is running or energized. • https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive _pdf/CPL_02-00-147.pdf
  • 63.
    1910.147(a)(1)(ii) Exemptions • Construction,agriculture and maritime employment; • Electrical Utilities; • Electrical equipment (covered by Subpart S) • Oil and gas well drilling and servicing
  • 64.
    1910.147(a)(2) Application • Serviceand maintenance: – Employee required to remove or bypass a guard or safety device – Employee required to place part of body into area that would be a danger zone during machine operation cycle
  • 65.
    OSHRC GM • Thestandard [does not apply] to servicing and maintenance that presents minimal and readily controlled risk . . . . • [E]ach covered employer’s burden is determined by the frequency and complexity of servicing actually undertaken. . . . • Machines and equipment that present no hazard are excluded from coverage.
  • 66.
    OSHRC GM • Parrytestified that once that gate was opened or an emergency stop button was hit, there could be no startup of any equipment until another time- consuming, multi-step startup procedure was completed, which inevitably would alert the servicing or maintenance employee. “Employee could not have followed proper procedures and must have entered the machine area without using the interlocked barrier gate as required.”
  • 67.
    1910.147(a)(2) Application: The lockoutstandard does not apply to work performed with electronic equipment that is connected to its energy source by a cord and plug. Exposure to this type of hazard is controlled by the worker, who isolates out the equipment by unplugging it before the servicing or maintenance and maintains exclusive control over the plug.
  • 68.
    1910.147(a)(2) Application • Doesnot apply to hot tap operations in transmission and distribution operations in pressurized pipelines provided that: – Continuity of service is essential, – Shutdown of system is impractical, and – Documented procedures and special equipment provide proven effective protection for employees
  • 69.
    1910.147 LOTO Control ofHazardous Energy Authorized Employees – perform LOTO 1910.333 Electrical LOTO Qualified Employees – perform LOTO Employers covering electrical work under the 1910.147 LOTO Program are encouraged to continue to do so. However those workers need to have additional training and the PPE required for 1910.333(b)(2)(iv). Compliance with 1910.331-.335 OSHA’s ESRWP & NFPA 70E Employees must be “qualified” in addition to “authorized”
  • 70.
    1910.147 LOTO Control ofHazardous Energy (Hydraulic, Electrical etc.) 1910.333 Electrical LOTO Shock, burns, fire, explosion, etc 3 main elements required: 1. Specific documented procedures 1. Photocopy of the 1910.333(b) is all that is needed for documented procedures 2. Training 2. Training per 1910.332 & NFPA 70E – Qualified Employee 3. Periodic Inspections 3. No “periodic inspections” required
  • 72.
  • 73.
    Many injuries withoutthe specific procedures needed by 1910.147
  • 74.
    May 2014 • Milford,IL • 3 willful at $70,000 each. • The worker was clearing birdseed from a large industrial mixing tank. • The worker’s left hand and arm were crushed after being caught in the moving parts of the mixing machine. • 147(c)(6)(i) • 147(c)(7)(i) • 147(d)(4)(i) The subsequent investigation determined Wagner’s failed to lock out energy sources, which would have protected the worker from contact with rotating components of the machine.
  • 75.
    147(c)(6)(i) • The employershall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.
  • 76.
    147(c)(7)(i) • The employershall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.
  • 77.
    147(d)(4)(i) • Lockout ortagout devices shall be affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees. What is missing?
  • 78.
    Removal • 1) Theuse of a master key to remove a lockout device would be deemed equivalent (to the removal of the lock by the person who applied it) only if it is performed under the employer's direction and in accordance with the requirements established in 1910.147(e)(3) • https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2000-02-28
  • 79.
    Removal • Specific proceduresand training for such removal have been developed, documented and incorporated into the employer's energy control program. • Verification by the employer that the authorized employee who applied the device is not at the facility: • Making all reasonable efforts to contact the authorized employee to inform him/her that his/her lockout or tagout device has been removed; and • Ensuring that the authorized employee has this knowledge before he/she resumes work at that facility.
  • 80.
    Scope LOTO covers theservicing and maintenance of machines and equipment to prevent injury to workers from: • unexpected energization or startup of the machines or equipment; • release of stored energy. How is stored air released for compressor?
  • 81.
    Servicing and Maintenance Isthere a potential for injury from unexpected startup or release of stored energy? Normal production operations are not taking place.
  • 82.
  • 83.
    Minor Servicing Exception •§1910.147(a)(2)(ii) note. • Minor servicing activities, which take place during normal production operations and which are routine, repetitive, and integral to the use of machine/equipment for production, are not covered by the LOTO standard if alternative methods provide effective employee protection from hazards associated with the control of hazardous energy (e.g., unexpected start-up). • Compliance with the machine guarding requirements of Subpart O is an example of such alternative measures. https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-147.pdf
  • 84.
    Minor Servicing Exception •Minor tool changes and adjustments, and other minor servicing activities that take place during normal production operations, are not covered by the Lockout/Tagout standard. • Three specific criteria can be used to determine if the minor servicing exception would apply to a particular activity. • ALL THREE criteria must be met; otherwise the Lockout/Tagout standard is applicable and the machine or equipment must be deenergized and all potentially hazardous energy rendered safe.
  • 85.
    Criteria #1 The activitymust be conducted during normal production operations, i.e., while the machine or equipment is actually performing its intended production function.
  • 86.
    Criteria #2 The activitymust be: • Routine: The activity must be a regular course of procedure and be in accordance with established practices. • Repetitive: The activity must be regularly repeated as part of the production process. • Integral: The activity must be essential to the production process.
  • 87.
    Criteria #3 Employer mustuse alternative measures to provide effective protection from the hazardous energy, such as: • specially designed tools, • remote devices, • interlocked barrier guards, • local disconnects, • or control switches which are under the exclusive control of the employee performing the minor servicing. Using an extension tool to prevent employee injury.
  • 88.
    Effectiveness of AlternativeMeasures • A CSHO should consider all of the steps taken by an employer to provide alternative, effective protection (e.g., training, disciplinary provisions, engineering controls, start-up alarms/delays, administrative provisions, near miss and related-injury data, etc.) in order to ascertain whether the alternative, including all of its steps, reliably prevents an employee from being injured by hazardous energy when performing servicing and maintenance activities under the “minor servicing” exception.
  • 89.
    Exception to LOTO •Definition of Set-up – Any work to prepare a machine to perform its normal production operation. • By definition, set-up activities can’t take place during normal production, so LOTO applies. What hazards are there during set of the lathe?
  • 90.
    Example - NotMeeting Exception • Same machine: the mold opened up too soon, the plastic part melts in the mold, and doesn’t fall. • Now someone has to go between mold with hand tools to pry and scrape off the material. • This is not routine or repetitive; it is done only as needed, so LOTO would apply.
  • 91.
    Inch Jog • Inchand jog devices have been included in the design of machines or equipment in order to safely perform set-up and to address maintenance problems associated with the straightening or feeding of material through their processes. • The use of properly designed and applied control circuitry (such as the use of two hand activation controls that are designed to control reliability standards and are mounted at a predetermined safety distance from the danger zone) for the testing or positioning of machine/equipment components, in conjunction with LOTO, prevent employee exposure to the hazard associated with the movement of machine/equipment components. • OSHA CPL 2003
  • 92.
    Push Buttons Seven (7)situations can cause unexpected motor energization or startup if this control circuit method is used: a. Another employee enters the motor controller (motor starter) enclosure and manually closes the relay; b. A malfunction of the push button; c. A relay or motor controller failure (e.g., defective spring; welded contacts). For example, a machine jam occurs causing higher current in the motor circuit, resulting in the freeze-up of the controller relay contact parts because the current creates arcing, which in turn welds shut the relay's plunger-coil mechanism. This could be particularly hazardous if an employee is relying on control circuits to clear jams as the energized machine could start up and injure the employee;
  • 93.
    Seven (7) situationscan cause unexpected motor energization or startup if this control circuit method is used: d. A loose wire contacts the conduit or enclosure; e. Two wires short out inside a damaged conduit (e.g., vibration causes wires to rub and wear through the wire’s insulation resulting in an electric short and bridging of the control circuit); f. Water, dirt, metal particles or other conductive foreign debris enters the control circuit enclosure causing the switch to operate because the material sufficiently bridges and closes the circuit, allowing current flow; or g. Ice, grease, dirt, wood, metal particles or other debris causes a push type control mechanism to stick in the closed position, allowing current to flow. OSHA CPL 2003 Push Buttons cont.
  • 94.
    Automated Palletizer • Operatorgoes inside this interlocked gate to perform minor servicing, but goes on the back side out of sight. Is this effective protection? interlocked gates
  • 95.
    LOTO Overview Lockout/tagout programconsists of: a) survey of all hazardous energy b) identifying energy-isolating devices c) selecting and procuring protective materials and hardware d) assigning duties and responsibilities e) determining shut-down, de-energization, energization and start-up sequences f) written procedures for machines, equipment, and processes g) training of personnel h) auditing program elements
  • 96.
    EXERCISE • What ishazardous energy? • List all Energy sources Some machines like this plastic injection molder station might have multiple sources of energy.
  • 97.
  • 98.
    Cleaning - Conveyor •The operator’s assistant wanted to clean the build-up from the Doser Conveyor. • This process uses a high-pressure water cleaner while the conveyor is in position and in operational mode. • His right arm was torn from his torso from the shoulder. • A section of guard near the tail drum had been removed and placed against a wall. • A shirt was tightly wrapped around the axle on one side of the tail drum • Soft mud was moved from 2 locations around the tail drum. • Conveyor was not turned off or isolated. Tail Drum
  • 99.
    Cleaning - MeatGrinder • A 15-year-old worker at a retail grocery store suffered amputation of the right arm. • He was caught by the auger of a meat grinder. • The victim was reassembling parts of a grinder he had cleaned without de-energizing and locking out the machine's power supply.
  • 100.
    Cleaning - MeatGrinder (continued) • He inserted the auger into the grinder's housing and reached through the feed-throat with his right hand to guide it into engagement. • He bumped against the on/off switch. • The grinder started, and the auger pulled his hand and arm into the housing.
  • 101.
    Control Reliability• Controlreliability is generally considered safety Category-3 or -4 as defined in ISO 13849- 1/ EN954-1 Standard for all types of circuits. • This ISO standard regarding Category-3 states” a single fault in any of these parts does not lead to the loss of the safety function” and that “a fault shall be detected at or before the next demand upon the safety function.” • And for Category-4, “an accumulation of undetected faults shall not lead to the loss of the safety function.”
  • 102.
    Control Reliability • Twogeneral abnormal conditions can affect valve safety. • The first is similar to an electrical-control fault, such as when a relay might be stuck in the open or closed position.
  • 103.
    Control Reliability • Thesecond abnormal condition is when a valve develops diminished performance, as when a valve becomes sticky or sluggish. • In these cases the valve reaches the proper position, but slower shifting affects safe stopping distances or precise timing.
  • 104.
    Control Reliability • TheANSI B11.19- 2003 Standard mandates a monitoring system that detects these conditions for critical applications and the ANSI/ PMMI B155.1 standard requires diminished performance monitoring if stopping time can be affected. • An easy solution is to use a self-monitoring, Category-3 or - 4 valve, designed to detect both conditions.
  • 105.
    De-energized • Disconnected fromall energy sources and not containing residual or stored energy (isolation).
  • 106.
    Energized • Connected toan energy source OR • Containing residual or stored energy.
  • 107.
    Momentum - Energy Proceduresmay require waiting for motion to stop on some machines. Bull Gears Flywheels
  • 108.
    Inspecting - Press Anengineer was looking at why paper backing was not feeding into a press. His head was caught between press and paper roll. Paper Roll
  • 109.
    Jam Clearing • Manytemporary employees get hurt or killed when clearing jams. • Many times machines start up when a jam is cleared. • Lockout is required to prevent re-energization. A horizontal shaft could restart once a jam is cleared. Lockout is required. The shaft needs to be guarded.
  • 110.
    Servicing and Maintenance –Constructing – Maintaining and/or servicing – Installing and setting up – Adjusting, inspecting, modifying – Lubricating, cleaning or un- jamming – Tool changes Note: LOTO applies to all workers performing these tasks, regardless of their job titles.
  • 111.
    Servicing - PolishingMachine • 18-year-old employee, had worked for 2 months. • Polishing machine stopped. • He went behind the machine. • He opened the guard to see if one of the empty polishing holders would spin freely. • He had his hand in there and hit the start switch. • The polishers began to spin at a little over 1,000 rpm. • What about the guard?
  • 112.
    Setup – DieCutter • Woman was caught in a die- cutting machine that she used to cut graphic art products. • The woman was pregnant; she suffered massive head and chest trauma and lost her baby. • The company attorney said the machine had been turned off. • The woman was preparing her next job - cutting a sign - and was far from the control buttons. • The machine moved enough to trap her.[Not actual machine]
  • 113.
    Energy Isolating Device-Lines • Isolation procedures – Blanking/blinding – Double block and bleed – Line breaking Tank with lines entering it Is the line or vessel de- pressurized?
  • 114.
    Setup - DieChanging • Worker hopes that photo is enough to convince someone to lockout equipment. • Worker was 20 at the time of the injury, thought he was “indestructible.” • He did not follow instructions for changing out dies. • Photo was taken on last day of rehab, a constant reminder of his mistake. • Worker is in pain and preparing for “very early retirement.”
  • 115.
    Stored Energy: Release, Block,or Otherwise Rendered Safe • Discharge capacitors • Block or release springs • Relieve system pressure • Drain fluids • Vent gases • Allow system to cool (or use PPE) • Allow momentum of mechanical motion to stop Note: some energy sources have to be addressed by other means.
  • 116.
    Tagout • Placement oftagout device – on an energy isolating device, – in accordance with an established procedure, – to indicate that energy isolating device and equipment being controlled may not be operated until tagout device is removed.
  • 117.
  • 118.
    Nucor Trapped KeyVariance 1. Modified the electrical controls 2. Installed a trapped key control system 3. Job hazard analysis for roll grinding - documented an electrical isolation analysis, - system and functional safety reviews, - control reliability analysis 4. Locking the trapped key to the lock box in the pulpit area inside a secondary group lock box installed on the roll mill floor 5. Developed detailed administrative energy control procedures 6. Implemented detailed administrative energy control procedures 7. Procured equipment and supplies; 8. English and Spanish for procedures; 9. Trained authorized and affected 10. Grinding on the passes is conducted only while using the administrative energy control procedures based on the trapped key system; 11. Installed guarding 12. Minimize the potential for authorized and affected employees to enter between the mill stands when harm could occur; and 13. Designated and posted the areas as "No Entry" https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_RE GISTER&p_id=26252 04/08/2016
  • 119.
    Work CellsKinetic (mechanical) energyin the moving parts of mechanical systems.
  • 120.
    Energy Control Program •1910.147(c)(1) • Written • Energy control procedures for each type of machine • Training and retraining to ensure employees understand the program • Periodic inspection to ensure procedures are being followed • Application of energy controls
  • 121.
    1910.147(c)(2)(ii) • If anenergy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the employer's energy control program shall utilize lockout.
  • 122.
  • 123.
    • Rack outbreakers Pump Panel
  • 124.
  • 125.
    How do youknow if they are de-energized? Pump Gauges
  • 126.
  • 127.
    Provide LOTO devices •A lockout board for employees
  • 128.
    Lockout Tags • Papertag . • Not 50 lbs strength. • Not weather-resistant.
  • 129.
    1910.147(c)(3) Full employee protection Theemployer must demonstrate that the a tagout system will provide full employee protection. Usually OSHA will not accept tagout.
  • 130.
    Feb 2018 What elseneeds to be done?
  • 131.
    1910.147(c)(2)(iii) • Energy isolatingdevices designed to accept lockout devices whenever: – Replacement or major repair, renovation or modification of equipment is performed, or – New machines or equipment are installed.
  • 132.
    Session 3: Energy ControlProcedures Employers must develop and document machine-specific procedures to control potentially hazardous energy.
  • 133.
    1910.147(c)(4) Energy control procedure • Proceduresshall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section. • Called Specific Procedures by OSHA.
  • 134.
    1910.147(c)(4) Energy control procedure •Outline scope, purpose, authorization, rules, techniques for control of hazardous energy, including: – Specific intended use of the procedure; – Specific steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing equipment; – Specific steps for placement, removal, transfer of lockout/tagout devices and responsibility for them; – Specific requirements for testing equipment to verify effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
  • 135.
    Application of theEnergy Control Procedure (in order) 1. Prepare for shutdown 2. Shut down equipment 3. Isolate all energy sources 4. Apply locks & tags 5. Release stored energy 6. Verify equipment isolation 7. Perform the task 8. Release from Lockout
  • 138.
  • 139.
    Step 1: Preparefor Shutdown • Understand equipment hazards Before an authorized or affected employee turns off a machine or equipment, the authorized employee shall know the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards, and the means to control it. • Notify other workers
  • 140.
    Step 2: ShutDown Equipment • Use the normal shutdown procedures • Turn all switches to OFF/Neutral
  • 141.
    Step 3: Isolateall Energy Sources Use energy isolation devices to prevent transmission or release of energy.
  • 142.
    Step 4: ApplyLocks & Tags Apply locks and tags to: • Valves • Breakers/electrical disconnects • Mechanical blocks Valve lockout device
  • 143.
    Step 5: Release orBlock all Stored Energy • Block/disconnect lines • Block or release springs • Block elevated parts • Relieve system pressure • Drain fluids • Vent gases • Allow system to cool (or use PPE) • Apply any additional locks and tags
  • 144.
    Step 6: VerifyEquipment Isolation • Check that other workers are clear of potential hazards • Check that locking devices are secure • Attempt normal startup • Return control to OFF/Neutral Controls to verify energy isolation
  • 145.
    Step 7: Performthe Task • Perform maintenance or service.
  • 146.
    Step 8: Releasefrom Lockout • Ensure machinery is properly assembled and all tools removed. • Ensure that employees are outside of danger zones and are notified that devices are being removed. • Remove LOTO devices –Must be removed by authorized employee who applied it.
  • 148.
  • 150.
  • 151.
    Specific Procedure Example •Shutdown the Mixer at the button. • Verify that all moving parts have stopped. • Lock and tag the knife switch with appropriate lockout devices. (Be sure to use your own personal locks with only one key for each lock, which you hold.) • Verify that the mixer is locked out by pushing on the ON button and seeing that mixer blades do not move. Worker locking out the mixer
  • 152.
    Lockout Removal • Totest or reposition machine/equipment. • Following sequence must occur: – Clear machine/equipment of tools/materials – Remove employees from area – Remove Lockout devices – Energize, test, or reposition equipment – De-energize, and reapply energy control measures before servicing Machine Guarding must be provided! Every lock should have an identifier for each person locking out.
  • 153.
  • 154.
  • 155.
  • 156.
    1910.147(c)(5) Protective materials and hardware •Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware shall be provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of equipment from energy sources.
  • 157.
    1910.147(c)(5) Protective materials andhardware • Lockout and tagout devices must be: – Singularly identified – The only device(s) used for controlling energy – Not used for other purposes – And shall meet the following requirements:
  • 158.
    1910.147(c)(5) Protective materials andhardware • Capable of withstanding environment for maximum time period • Moisture or corrosives must not make tag deteriorate • Standardized: – Color – Shape – Size – Print/Format
  • 159.
    1910.147(c)(5) Protective materials andhardware • Lockout and tagout devices indicate identity of employee applying devices.
  • 160.
  • 161.
  • 162.
  • 163.
  • 164.
  • 165.
    Electrical Lockout Devices Lockedout electrical panel Locked out circuit breaker Hasp for multiple locks
  • 166.
    Group Lock Box Simplifieslockout of large equipment. After machine or process is locked out, keys are placed in a lock box. Each authorized work team member places a personal lock or tagout device to the group lock box.
  • 167.
    Fluid and GasLockout Devices
  • 168.
  • 169.
    Improper Valve Lockout •This photo illustrates the air line that supplied the debarker and is not properly locked out [courtesy of SCOSHA]. • The insert is a ball-valve lockout device that can be used to lock out the pneumatic airline.
  • 170.
    Close Call • Otherpeople became involved with the refiner and needed to lock out the same breaker. • They saw the hasp (multiple lockout device) and placed their locks on the hasp. • The millwright was able to take his lock off the breaker and remove all other locks.
  • 171.
    Pneumatic Valve IsolationExamples Handle /lever Note: Some are self-exhausting, but not all. Piston Gate Valve
  • 172.
    Common Hydraulic Isolation •Most pumps are operated by electrical motors. • Open and lockout disconnects for pump motors. Hydraulic pumps may be driven by battery-powered motors, e.g., fork trucks. Note: All stored energy including accumulators must also be relieved. Disconnect
  • 173.
    Valve Isolation Distilled waterline ball valve with the valve handle perpendicular to the pipe line (ball valve is closed). Jaws of the safety lockout hasp pass through the hole in the valve handle and a hole fixed in the valve body. 2 padlock shackles (each with a lockout danger tag) pass through separate lockout points on the safety lockout hasp (2 people working on this task).
  • 174.
    Pipe Isolation Examples BlankFlange Breaking Line Blocking Line
  • 175.
    True “Double Block& Bleed” PI Double block and bleed: method of process isolation where there are two physical barriers (valves, blinds, etc.) with bleed off in between Each barrier can be operated, secured, and tested independently. Two valves in a series without bleed-off in-between are counted as a single valve (barrier). Chemical Piping Isolation
  • 176.
    VacuBlast Cabinet w/DustExtractor • Type Magnitude • Electrical 415 volts • Pneumatic 100 psi • Required Safety Equipment • Tagout Tag(s) (2) • Interlocking Hasp(s) (2) • Padlock(s) (2) • Ball Valve Lockout(s) (1)
  • 177.
    Verify Equipment Isolation •Check that other workers are clear of hazards. • Check that locking devices are secure. • Attempt normal startup. • Return control to OFF/Neutral. Controls to verify energy isolation
  • 178.
    Verification • Testing circuitry,cycling, visually inspecting position, manually trying; monitoring movement or discharge; observing bleeds, gauges, indicators, etc; or other available means. • Use technique(s) with the best degree of isolation assurance. • Do not rely on pressure gages alone to indicate pressure. They are often inoperable.
  • 179.
    Power Press –LOTO Procedure Energy Sources: • Electric motor drive-belt drive • Rotating flywheel – momentum • Ram/slide - gravity • Air clutch – 90 PSI line pressure Disconnect Motor
  • 180.
    Power Press –LOTO Procedure Energy Sources: • Electric motor drive • Rotating flywheel – momentum • Ram/slide - gravity • Air clutch Procedure: • Turn off machine and wait until flywheel stops • Open disconnect and place lock • Place block under ram • Close air valve and place lock; listen for air to bleed off Verify: • Try starting motor • Observe die blocks in place • Observe flywheel has stopped • Observe air gage to read 0 pressure Disconnect Motor
  • 181.
    Lockout Log A writtenprocedure should be established with a log to track locations, time, employees and devices.
  • 182.
    Session 4: Required Training •Authorized employees – Recognition of hazardous energy sources – Type and magnitude of energy in the workplace – Methods for energy isolation / control • Affected employees – Purpose and use of energy control procedures • Other employees in work area – Procedures related to restarting machines
  • 183.
    Training ● Workers clearingjam need to lockout the conveyor. ● The conveyor needs an emergency stop, guards for belts/pulleys and safety trip wires.
  • 184.
    Required Training Employees mustbe trained in the following limitations of tagout systems: • Tags are warning devices and do not provide the physical restraint that is provided by a lock. • When a tag is attached to an energy isolating means, it is never to be removed without authorization or ignored.
  • 185.
    • Tags mustbe understandable by all authorized employees, affected employees, and all other employees whose work operations are in the area. • Tags and their means of attachment must be made of materials that will withstand the environmental conditions in the workplace. • Tags may evoke a false sense of security • Tags must be securely attached to energy-isolating devices so that they cannot be detached during use. Required Training (cont’d)
  • 186.
    Retraining Requirements Retraining isrequired in the following cases: – Change in job assignments – Change in machines – Change in energy control procedures – Equipment or processes present new hazards – Inspections reveal deficiencies in employee's knowledge of energy control procedures Retraining must reestablish employee proficiency.
  • 187.
  • 188.
    Exercise • Shaft • Lockoutissues? • Other Issues?
  • 189.
  • 190.
    Cleaning Training • Cleaninga machine is not supposed to be a hazard. • Guards are in place to prevent exposure to hazardous motions. • If guards must be removed to clean, lockout is required. Cleaning a conveyor is a common source of death and amputations. This conveyor does not have guards for the rotation of the horizontal drive shafts.
  • 191.
  • 192.
    Temps • Maintenance locksfor temp cleaners is NOT acceptable. • On December 16, 2011, a 28-year-old male temporary worker (victim) was fatally injured while cleaning and sanitizing a double auger screw conveyor machine (feed pump skid).
  • 193.
    Session 5: Periodic Inspections •1910.147(c)(6) • Performed at least annually. • Conducted by authorized employees. • Intended to correct inadequacies identified in program. • Certified.
  • 194.
    Periodic Audits • Machineswhere procedures are used • Date of inspection • Employees included in inspection • Person who performed inspection
  • 195.
    Audit Interpretation • “Eachenergy control procedure must be separately inspected at least annually to ensure that the energy control program is being properly utilized.” • March 9, 2004
  • 196.
    Audit Interpretation • “Groupingenergy control procedures for same or similar machines or equipment for inspection purposes may streamline the inspection and review process, since there will be a smaller number of procedure groups than individual procedures. Thus, an employer may elect to group procedures as described above, and then inspect a representative number of such employees implementing one procedure within each group. “ • November 30, 2010
  • 197.
    Audit Interpretation • “OSHA interprets this to mean that there must be a review between an authorized employee designated by the employer as the "inspector" and all other authorized employees (and all affected employee when tagout is used to control energy) of the employee's responsibilities under the periodic inspection being inspected.“ • June 20, 1996
  • 198.
    Audit Interpretation • Theperiodic inspection consists of two requirements. • First, the inspector must observe a representative sample of authorized employees performing the servicing and maintenance operation using the lockout/tagout procedure. • Second, the inspector must perform a review with each authorized employee of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected. • From OSHA Hot Topics - Lockout
  • 200.
  • 201.
  • 202.
  • 203.
  • 204.
    Lockout Audits • Forlockout, it's important for an authorized employee to actually conduct the procedure to demonstrate that the procedure does work. • It's also important to test the e-stops, although this is better done at the end of shift because it may be difficult to get the automation running again.
  • 205.
    Lockout Audits Audit lockoutfor new people right away vs waiting a year.
  • 206.
    Lockout Audit • LargeFood Processor • 700 workers • 40 maintenance • JSA with Specific procedure. • Every non-routine maintenance is an audit.
  • 207.
  • 208.
    Sample Audit Results •Lockout location info not correct. • Contractor padlock not identified to who it was protecting. • PPE for lockout was not correct for the hazard.
  • 209.
    Nov 2018 • You’rea good man! • Pay attention to the “forgotten shifts”. • We have had three fatalities and over 12 amputations within the last year on either 2nd or 3rd shifts. • Almost all of these companies had LO/TO programs and training but had not done any off shift periodic inspections to verify compliance. • Please spread the word!
  • 210.
    July 2013 • "Lockoutthe disconnect at the knife switch on the single pole behind the machine." • I looked behind the machine. • No disconnect. • The closest disconnect was to my right. I said I would lock out this knife switch.
  • 211.
    Interpretation • “Observing onlya single authorized employee implementing each lockout procedure, rather than a representative number of employees, also does not meet the intent of the standard.” • https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta /lototraining/case/cs4-1y.html
  • 212.
  • 213.
    Session 6: Applicationof the Energy Control Procedure • When the authorized employee who applied the lockout or tagout device is not available, that device may be removed under the direction of the employer (if safety is not compromised). • The specific procedure for removal in this situation includes:
  • 214.
    Exception (cont’d) • The employerverifies that the authorized employee who applied the device is not at the facility. • The employer tries to contact the authorized employee (before he/she resumes work) to tell him/her that the lockout or tagout device has been removed.
  • 215.
    Additional Requirements Testing orpositioning of machines, equipment or components. If lockout or tagout devices must be removed and the machine or equipment energized to test or position the machine, equipment or components, take these steps (in order):
  • 216.
    Additional Requirements (cont’d) • Clearthe machine or equipment of tools and materials in accordance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section; • Remove employees from the machine or equipment area (e)(2); • Remove the lockout or tagout devices [paragraph (e)(3)].
  • 217.
    • Energize andproceed with testing or positioning; • De-energize all systems and reapply energy controls to continue the servicing and/or maintenance [paragraph (d)]. Additional Requirements (cont’d)
  • 218.
  • 219.
  • 220.
  • 221.
  • 222.
  • 223.
  • 224.
    Who needs training? 1910.332(a) Employees inoccupations listed in Table S-4 face such a risk and are required to be trained. Other employees who also may reasonably be expected to face comparable risk of injury due to electric shock or other electrical hazards must also be trained.  At a minimum, be trained in and familiar with the following:  The skills and techniques necessary to distinguish exposed live parts from other parts of electric equipment.  The skills and techniques necessary to determine the nominal voltage of exposed live parts, and  The clearance distances specified in 1910.333(c) and the corresponding voltages to which the qualified person will be exposed.
  • 225.
    Table S4 ➢ Bluecollar supervisors ➢ Electrical and electronic engineers ➢ Electrical and electronic equipment assemblers ➢ Electrical and electronic technicians ➢ Electricians ➢ Industrial machine operators ➢Material handling equipment operators Typical Occupational Categories of Employees Facing a Higher Than Normal RIsk of Electrical Accident: ➢ Mechanics and repairers ➢ Painters ➢ Riggers and roustabouts ➢ Stationary engineers ➢ Welders
  • 226.
  • 227.
    1910.147(f)(2) Outside Personnel • Contractorsand other outside personnel: – On-site employer and outside employer inform each other of lockout/tagout procedures. – On-site employer complies with outside employer’s energy control program.
  • 228.
    1910.147(f)(3) Group Lockout orTagout • Each authorized employee affixes personal lockout/tagout device to group lockout device when beginning work. • Each removes personal device when stopping work on this equipment.
  • 229.
    Outside Contractors • Mustadhere to standard’s requirements. • Must inform each other of respective program responsibilities.
  • 230.
    Shift Personnel • Continuitymust be maintained for orderly transfer. • Helps minimize exposure status, and release of stored energy.
  • 231.
  • 232.
    Voltage Detectors • “Sensesthe steady state electrostatic field produced by AC voltage through insulation without requiring contact to the bare conductor. • A red glow at the tip and a beeping noise (if not switched OFF) indicates the presence of voltage.” - FLUKE The detector will not work on DC. Workers must test for the absence of voltage.
  • 233.
    AC Voltage Detectors Source:Fluke Read the safety limitations from the tester mfr
  • 234.
    •Worker died whenshocked pulling out barrel fuse with pliers •Electrical circuits must be locked out before doing any work on the circuits if possible. Fuse Pulling
  • 235.
    Outdoor Signs Worker foundunconscious taking out electric receptacle while still energized. Breakers were not locked out. No labels in panel.
  • 236.
    Other Issues • Orangedisconnects for the heaters
  • 237.
  • 238.
  • 239.
  • 240.
    • Signs? • Whydo people go in? Boiler
  • 241.
  • 242.
  • 243.
  • 244.
  • 245.
  • 246.
    Food Packaging • Onefinger amputation. • Worker went to clear jam. • Caught in chain and sprocket. • Machine auto started. • Lack of training.
  • 247.
    Wire Drawing • Severeinjuries to worker setting-up equipment. • Caught in wire • Machine either auto started or malfunctioned. • No lockout. • Lack of training.
  • 248.
    SIGCASE • $207,450 • Workercleaning equipment in preparation of set-up. • Equipment not locked out. • Worker not trained. • No specific procedures. • 5 amputations.
  • 249.
    Lockout • Employee wasfixing a printing press without de-energizing it. • Each employee must lockout if more than one exposed.
  • 250.
    Lockout • Employee tryingto adjust machine while running.
  • 251.
    Permanent Out ofService • Question: When equipment is placed in an "out of service" status for business or production purposes (e.g., poor efficiency, recycled, sold, etc.) and not related to servicing or maintenance, is the use of lockout/tagout devices for this purpose a violation of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)? • Reply: Yes. As you have stated in your letter, applying lockout/tagout devices to equipment that was placed out of service for business or production reasons would not ". . .preserve the integrity of the Lockout/Tagout program." The preamble to the final rule states, at 54 Federal Register 36671 (Sept. 1, 1989): ". . . the sight of a distinctive lock or tag will provide a constant message of the use that the device is being put to and the restrictions which this device is intended to convey. If lockout or tagout devices are used for other purposes they can lose their significance in the workplace. For the energy control procedure to be effective, these devices must have a single meaning to employees: 'Do not energize the equipment when such a device is affixed to it.'"
  • 252.
    November 2015 • Thisis an IMPROPERLY wired disconnect switch.
  • 253.
    Exelon EEI andIBEW • 2005 OSHRC • The Secretary notes in her brief that the core principle of lockout is that each employee who is potentially exposed to hazardous energy will have his own lockout or tagout device attached to the energy isolating device during the servicing operation and that the equipment cannot be re- energized until each employee removes his own lock or tag.
  • 254.
    Court of Appeals •OSHA expressly rejected “EEI[’s] argument that the person removing a lockout or tagout device need not be the same as the person who placed it,” and instead adopted the position that “each employee must have the assurance that the device is in his or her control, and that it will not be removed by anyone else except in an emergency situation.”
  • 255.
    Consensus Standards • OSHArecognizes the valuable contributions of national consensus standards, and in many respects, these standards offer useful guidance for employers and employees attempting to control hazardous energy. • However, the OSH Act contemplates a distinction between the national consensus standard process and the process of OSHA rulemaking. • While the former often produces information useful in the latter, it is not automatically equivalent • However, in several important respects, the ANSI standard appears to sanction practices that may provide less employee protection than that provided by compliance with the relevant OSHA provisions.
  • 257.
  • 259.
    Hazard Control Hierarchy Examples: •Eliminate pinch points (increase clearance) • Intrinsically safe (energy containment) • Automated material handling (robots, conveyors, etc.) • Redesign the process to eliminate or reduce human interaction • Reduced energy • Substitute less hazardous chemicals Risk Reduction Measure: Elimination or Substitution Classification: Design Out Influence on Risk Factors: • Impact on overall risk (elimination) by affecting severity and probability of harm. • May affect severity of harm, frequency of exposure to the hazard under consideration, and/or the possibility of avoiding or limiting harm depending on which method of substitution is applied.
  • 260.
    Hazard Control Hierarchy Examples: •Barriers • Interlocks • Presence sensing devices (light curtains, safety mats, area scanners, etc.) • Two hand control and two-hand trip devices Risk Reduction Measure: Guards, Safeguarding Devices Classification: Engineering Controls Influence on Risk Factors: • Greatest impact on the probability of harm (Occurrence of hazardous events under certain circumstances) • Minimal if any impact on severity of harm
  • 261.
    Hazard Control Hierarchy Examples: •Lights, beacons and strobes • Computer warnings • Signs and labels • Beepers, horns and sirens Risk Reduction Measure: Awareness Devices Classification: Administrative Controls Influence on Risk Factors: • Potential impact on the probability of harm (avoidance) • No impact on severity of harm
  • 262.
    Hazard Control Hierarchy Examples: •Safe work procedures • Safety equipment inspections • Training • Lockout/Tagout/Verify Risk Reduction Measure: Training and Procedures Classification: Administrative Controls Influence on Risk Factors: • Potential impact on the probability of harm (avoidance) • No impact on severity of harm
  • 263.
    Hazard Control Hierarchy Examples: •Safety glasses and face shields • Ear plugs • Gloves • Protective footwear • Respirators Risk Reduction Measure: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Classification: Administrative Controls Influence on Risk Factors: • Potential impact on the probability of harm (avoidance) • No impact on severity of harm
  • 264.
    Provisions for Alternative MethodInterruption In situations in which alternative methods must be temporarily discontinued so that the machine or equipment may be energized to test or position the machine, equipment or component thereof, the following sequence of actions shall be followed: • Clear the machine or equipment of tools and materials. • Remove affected persons from the machine or equipment area. • Temporarily discontinue alternative methods. • Provide a safe position for persons. • Position the machine, equipment or process. • Perform the task. • When the hazardous energy is no longer needed, reapply the alternative methods.
  • 265.
    Evaluating Alternative Methods Inevaluating an alternative method to lockout or tagout, the risk reduction measures that will comprise the alternative method shall be identified. Based on current analyses and best practices, alternative methods shall consist of the following parameters as applicable:
  • 266.
    Evaluating Alternative Methods •practicability/justification analysis (clause 8.2.1) • risk assessment based on the tasks being performed (clause 8.2.2) • industry best practices/methods (clause 8.2.3) • architecture/structure (clause 8.2.4) • using well-tried components (clause 8.2.5) • using well-tried designs (clause 8.2.6) • common cause failure (clause 8.2.7) • fault tolerance (clause 8.2.8) • exclusivity of control (clause 8.2.9) • tamper resistance (clause 8.2.10) • program to support (clause 8.2.11) • procedures in place (clause 8.2.12) • periodic checking and testing (clause 8.2.13) • review by a qualified person (clause 8.2.14)
  • 267.
    March 27, 2007 •OAKDALE, Calif. -- A worker at a Hershey Co. chocolate factory lost her arm when a machine she was cleaning accidentally switched on, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. • Erica Domen, 32, of Modesto, was cleaning a batter-sifting machine when the accident occurred at around 1:20 a.m. Saturday at the company's Oakdale plant, about 15 miles northeast of Modesto, a spokesman for the state division of OSHA said.
  • 268.
    Summary • Machine safetyis using lockout and/or machine guarding. • Every worker must know where the hazards are on each machine • You are either an authorized employee who is given authority to lockout or an affected employee who cannot work on the machines when trouble occurs. When a jam occurs, they must have lockout or machine guards. This food packing machine has inadequate guards that allow entry into the point of operation.