The document discusses the safety of vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, motorcyclists, and bicyclists. It notes that over 80% of road fatalities in Indonesia involve these groups. For pedestrians, it identifies the elderly, young children, disabled individuals, and intoxicated persons as being at higher risk. It recommends strategies like segregation of pedestrians from vehicles on highways, integration of pedestrians and vehicles on shared roads, and separation of pedestrians and vehicles by time or space. For motorcyclists and bicyclists, it suggests measures like consistent road design without surprises, smooth surfaces, lateral space on roads, sealed shoulders, and forgiving roadsides. The document encourages considering the needs of

1. The safety of vulnerable
road users
Semarang
19th & 20th April 2012
Phillip Jordan, Consultant
Road Safety International Pty Ltd

2. Objectives today:
• To explain why pedestrians, motorcyclists and bicyclists
deserve special attention in safety.
• To explain a few simple things you can do to help them.
• To encourage you to think carefully about them in your
blackspot investigations.

3. Part C Vulnerable Road users

4. Part C Vulnerable Road users

5. Part C Vulnerable Road users

6. Part C Vulnerable Road users
• Pedestrians • More than 80% of
• Bicyclists Indonesian road
• Motorcyclists fatalities

7. Four “special” groups of pedestrians:
• elderly - 45% of fatalities are over 60 years
• young - 20% of fatalities are aged 4-12 years
• intoxicated - 43% of night time fatalities ≥ 0.15% BAC
• disabled – need special assistance to get around

8. Pedestrians
• The young • Segregation
• The elderly • Integration
• The disabled • Separation – time
– Space
• The impaired (intoxicated)

9. Pedestrians
Young

10. young - 20% of fatalities are aged 4-12 years

11. Pedestrians
Elderly

12. Disabled

13. intoxicated - 43% of fatalities ≥ 0.15% BAC
(3 times the limit for drivers in Australia)

17. 3
There are three basic pedestrian
strategies…
3
3

18. Segregation – freeways, malls
Separation – in time or in space
Integration – where vehicles and pedestrians “share”
the road

19. Segregation – freeways

20. Segregation – malls

21. Separation – in time

22. Separation – in time

23. Separation – in time

24. Separation – in time

25. Separation – in time

26. Separation – in time

27. Bogor POS
Separation – in time

28. Bogor POS

29. Separation – in time

30. Separation – in time

31. Separation – in time

32. PUFFIN Crossing

38. But what can we do to assist pedestrians to walk along the road?

39. But what can we do to assist pedestrians to walk along the road?

40. But what can we do to assist pedestrians to walk along the road?

41. But what can we do to assist pedestrians to walk along the road?

42. Keep footpaths clear

43. Keep footpaths clear

45. What can we do to assist motorcyclists?

46. Consistency – no surprises
Smooth surface
Lateral space
Sealed shoulders
The same good traffic management that cars,
trucks and buses require
Forgiving roadsides

47. Road engineers have a dilemma
Very rough road – low speeds. Crashes
minor
Excellent (if smooth) road – higher
speed. Crashes serious

48. Sealed shoulders – shown to lead to
12% reduction in casualty crashes

49. Motorcyclists

50. Motorcyclists

51. Bicyclists

52. Give bicyclists space, connectivity, and
a smooth riding surface

53. Your vulnerable road users deserve your attention.
Your questions are welcomed