Equipment Availability Analysis

  Fred Schenkelberg, Ops A La Carte,
  LLC Angela Lo, Kaiser Permanente
Overview
• Bottling line
  – Multiple bottle sizes
  – Multiple flavors
• Build to finished goods inventory
  – Mixed shipments of FG to distribution centers
  – Daily shipments
  – Broad variation in demand of bottle size and flavor
Introduction
• Throughput directly related to inventory size
• Inventory is expensive

• Goal is to improve the throughput to
  equipment capabilities seen over long runs to
  short runs.

  How much inventory reduction is possible?
Existing Analysis
• The filler (bottleneck) has the following values




            Given a 400 bottles / min equipment average capability
Desired Improvement
• (Anecdotally) the line runs better over time

• Improve the analysis to calculate MTBF over
  various length runs

• Make the calculations time dependant
Mean Cumulative Function
Filler - Time to Failure
Filler - Time to Repair
General Renewal Process
• Assumptions
  – Time to first failure is known (Weibull)
  – Time to repair is negligible relative to runtime.


• Permit modeling of repairs that are between
  – As good as new
  – As bad as old
Cumulative Failure Intensity vs Time
New MTBF Values
  Length of
     run       120       240        480        960        1440
  (minutes)
 Cumulative
               7.17      9.29      11.56       13.26      14.16
    MTBF
Instantaneou
      s        20.75    26.53      32.57       37.45      34.72
    MTBF



The long term MTBF value is 45.6, resulting in approximate
2.63 minutes to build 1000 units. Building the same inventory
faster, permits the inventory reduction.
Results
 Length of
     run        120      240        480        960        1440
 (minutes)
Time to build   3.53     3.33       3.19       3.12       3.09
 1000 units
%Improveme
      nt        25.5     20.9       17.5       15.6       14.7
with 380/min



For a 4 hour run (240 minutes) if the equipment is improved to
a 380/minute throughput, there is at least a
20% inventory reduction
Summary & Conclusion
• Using the GPP model to estimate MTBF for
  various run time and calculate throughput
• The possible throughput improvement costs
  can now be balanced with potential cost
  savings
• The improved performance visibility
  encouraged a study of the shift change and
  restart behavior

Equipment Availability Analysis

  • 1.
    Equipment Availability Analysis Fred Schenkelberg, Ops A La Carte, LLC Angela Lo, Kaiser Permanente
  • 2.
    Overview • Bottling line – Multiple bottle sizes – Multiple flavors • Build to finished goods inventory – Mixed shipments of FG to distribution centers – Daily shipments – Broad variation in demand of bottle size and flavor
  • 3.
    Introduction • Throughput directlyrelated to inventory size • Inventory is expensive • Goal is to improve the throughput to equipment capabilities seen over long runs to short runs. How much inventory reduction is possible?
  • 4.
    Existing Analysis • Thefiller (bottleneck) has the following values Given a 400 bottles / min equipment average capability
  • 5.
    Desired Improvement • (Anecdotally)the line runs better over time • Improve the analysis to calculate MTBF over various length runs • Make the calculations time dependant
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Filler - Timeto Failure
  • 8.
    Filler - Timeto Repair
  • 9.
    General Renewal Process •Assumptions – Time to first failure is known (Weibull) – Time to repair is negligible relative to runtime. • Permit modeling of repairs that are between – As good as new – As bad as old
  • 10.
  • 11.
    New MTBF Values Length of run 120 240 480 960 1440 (minutes) Cumulative 7.17 9.29 11.56 13.26 14.16 MTBF Instantaneou s 20.75 26.53 32.57 37.45 34.72 MTBF The long term MTBF value is 45.6, resulting in approximate 2.63 minutes to build 1000 units. Building the same inventory faster, permits the inventory reduction.
  • 12.
    Results Length of run 120 240 480 960 1440 (minutes) Time to build 3.53 3.33 3.19 3.12 3.09 1000 units %Improveme nt 25.5 20.9 17.5 15.6 14.7 with 380/min For a 4 hour run (240 minutes) if the equipment is improved to a 380/minute throughput, there is at least a 20% inventory reduction
  • 13.
    Summary & Conclusion •Using the GPP model to estimate MTBF for various run time and calculate throughput • The possible throughput improvement costs can now be balanced with potential cost savings • The improved performance visibility encouraged a study of the shift change and restart behavior