The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
Crossing the line of contact (February – December 2018)DonbassFullAccess
This report summarizes a survey of civilians crossing the line of contact between the government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas of Ukraine from February to December 2018. Over 24,000 people were interviewed at 5 entry-exit checkpoints. The most common reasons for crossing were avoiding suspension of social benefits and pensions, issues with documents like pensions and IDs, visiting relatives, withdrawing cash, and shopping. Reconstruction at the checkpoints from the second half of 2018 improved conditions. Long wait times remained the top concern, along with poor infrastructure like roads and the lack of bus stations. Most respondents were over 60 years old and resided in the non-government area prior to the conflict.
Objective: to identify the attitude of citizens of Ukraine to the socio-political and economic situation in the country, to determine the electoral preferences and level of confidence towards the civil and public institutions, as well as to form an estimate of judgments of the situation in the Donbas, e-declaration and other high-profile events
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
Crossing the line of contact (February – December 2018)DonbassFullAccess
This report summarizes a survey of civilians crossing the line of contact between the government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas of Ukraine from February to December 2018. Over 24,000 people were interviewed at 5 entry-exit checkpoints. The most common reasons for crossing were avoiding suspension of social benefits and pensions, issues with documents like pensions and IDs, visiting relatives, withdrawing cash, and shopping. Reconstruction at the checkpoints from the second half of 2018 improved conditions. Long wait times remained the top concern, along with poor infrastructure like roads and the lack of bus stations. Most respondents were over 60 years old and resided in the non-government area prior to the conflict.
Objective: to identify the attitude of citizens of Ukraine to the socio-political and economic situation in the country, to determine the electoral preferences and level of confidence towards the civil and public institutions, as well as to form an estimate of judgments of the situation in the Donbas, e-declaration and other high-profile events
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
Assessment of the situation in the donbas minsk agreementsUIFuture
This document summarizes the results of a socio-political survey regarding the situation in the Donbas region of Ukraine and the Minsk agreements. Key findings include:
- Only 11.4% of respondents were familiar with the content of the Minsk agreements, while 60.3% had superficial knowledge.
- Support for Ukraine adhering to the Minsk agreements decreased from 54.9% to 42.3% compared to a previous survey.
- Respondents were pessimistic about resolving the Donbas conflict, with 37.5% believing it would be frozen for a decade.
- There was no clear consensus on how to solve the problem of occupied Donbas territories.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The USAID-funded survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of IRI, and the fieldwork was carried out by Rating Group Ukraine.
The document provides a summary of a November 2018 survey of people crossing checkpoints between government and non-government controlled areas in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- The majority (90%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas. Most common reasons for crossing differed depending on area of residence.
- The number of respondents over age 60 increased by 9% to 63% of total, likely due to pension requirements. Reconstruction continued to cause some delays at certain checkpoints.
- Weather deterioration increased safety risks at two checkpoints due to poor infrastructure conditions. Concerns about shelling remained highest at one checkpoint.
Crossing the Line of Contact - Monitoring Report, March 2018DonbassFullAccess
This report provides the results of the March 2018 round of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) with the non-government-controlled area (NGCA) administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The EECPs are located in Donetsk (Maiorske, Marinka, Hnutove and Novotroitske) and Luhansk (Stanytsia Luhanska) Oblasts.
The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of the rights of the conflict-affected population within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore the reasons and concerns of those travelling between the NGCA and the government controlled area (GCA), as well as the conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through the EECPs. It should be noted that the survey results should not be directly extrapolated onto the entire population crossing the checkpoints, but it helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts.
The data collection methodology was the same at all EECPs. R2P monitors surveyed civilians queuing at the government-controlled side of EECPs in the lines for pedestrians and for vehicles both in GCA and NGCA directions. The survey was conducted anonymously and on a voluntary basis. All persons interviewed for the survey were informed about its purpose.
This report is based on the data collected from 1 to 29 March 2018 during 44 visits to the five EECPs. This reporting period is characterized by the transition to the spring schedule of operation on the government-controlled side of the EECPs (07:00 to 18:30).
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints between government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas in Ukraine. Key findings from the August 2018 survey include:
- The majority of respondents were elderly women and residents of non-government-controlled areas.
- Over half of respondents reported spending over 4 hours to cross the line of contact, with the longest wait times at Marinka checkpoint.
- Respondents' most common reasons for crossing included visiting relatives, obtaining pensions and documents, and shopping, with reasons varying by travel direction and age.
- Respondents reported that checkpoints on the non-government-controlled side took longer to pass through, except at Stanyts
This document provides a summary of a survey conducted in September 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints along the contact line between the non-government controlled area and government-controlled area in eastern Ukraine. The survey gathered information from 1,891 respondents on their demographics, reasons for crossing the contact line, frequency of crossings, and concerns about the process. Key findings include: the majority of respondents were female residents of the non-government controlled area crossing to address documents or banking issues; reasons for crossing varied depending on destination but included visiting relatives and property checks; and the longest wait times were reported at the Marinka checkpoint, where reconstruction had little effect on traffic.
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted in June 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints along the line of contact in eastern Ukraine. The following key points were reported:
- Most respondents were female elderly residents of non-government controlled areas who cross the checkpoints quarterly to access pensions and services.
- Travel to government-controlled areas was mostly to address documents issues and withdrawals, while travel to non-government areas was to visit relatives and check property.
- Crossing times averaged 2-3 hours, with the longest waits at Maiorske checkpoint. Conditions were most difficult at Stanytsia Luhanska due to a one-hour walk between checkpoints.
- Main concerns included long
Public Opinion Survey: Residents of MoldovamResearcher
The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center
for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting.
Media consumption and political preferences in Luhanska oblastDonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the results of a media consumption survey conducted in the Luhanska oblast region of Ukraine between November 2015 and March 2017. Over 28,000 respondents were interviewed across multiple regions to understand their media preferences and political views. The document outlines the methodology, sample sizes, and key findings regarding television, radio, print, online and social media usage in Luhanska oblast and some sub-regions. Television remains the most widely consumed media, while Russian and local language content is also popular alongside Ukrainian media.
Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal SurveyRatinggroup
This document summarizes the results of municipal surveys conducted in Ukraine in 2015, 2016, and 2017. It provides ratings and indexes of satisfaction for various public goods and services, opportunities, safety, and pride across different cities in Ukraine. It also includes data on satisfaction with municipal authorities. Overall, it analyzes ratings and perceptions of life in cities across several domains to understand trends over the survey periods.
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Analysis of the results of local elections 2015Rating Pro
1) According to vote tallies, Petro Poroshenko Bloc "Solidarnist" received 19.4% of the vote, Batkivshchyna received 12%, and Opposition bloc received 11.5% in the local elections for regional councils.
2) Voter turnout was less than half of eligible voters, one of the lowest rates in Ukrainian election history, despite polls showing support for more regional power.
3) Only political forces that sharply criticized the central government, such as UKROP and Batkivshchyna, were able to increase their gains compared to the 2014 parliamentary elections.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, December 2018DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted between December 13-27, 2018. It provides details on the methodology, including that a representative sample of 2,400 Ukrainians were surveyed through in-person interviews. Key findings include that 32% said they definitely intend to vote in the 2019 presidential election, with Yulia Tymoshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi emerging as the top choices for president at 16% and 11% respectively. The document also examines potential second round matchups between candidates.
Social and political moods of Ukrainians, december 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from December 13-27, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents. It found that 32% said they definitely would vote in the 2019 presidential election, while 42% said they somewhat would vote. If the election was held the following Sunday, the top candidates respondents said they would vote for were Yulia Tymoshenko at 16%, Volodymyr Zelenskyi at 11%, and Petro Poroshenko at 9%. The survey also examined potential run-off election matchups between candidates.
Assessment of the situation in the donbas minsk agreementsUIFuture
This document summarizes the results of a socio-political survey regarding the situation in the Donbas region of Ukraine and the Minsk agreements. Key findings include:
- Only 11.4% of respondents were familiar with the content of the Minsk agreements, while 60.3% had superficial knowledge.
- Support for Ukraine adhering to the Minsk agreements decreased from 54.9% to 42.3% compared to a previous survey.
- Respondents were pessimistic about resolving the Donbas conflict, with 37.5% believing it would be frozen for a decade.
- There was no clear consensus on how to solve the problem of occupied Donbas territories.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The USAID-funded survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of IRI, and the fieldwork was carried out by Rating Group Ukraine.
The document provides a summary of a November 2018 survey of people crossing checkpoints between government and non-government controlled areas in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- The majority (90%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas. Most common reasons for crossing differed depending on area of residence.
- The number of respondents over age 60 increased by 9% to 63% of total, likely due to pension requirements. Reconstruction continued to cause some delays at certain checkpoints.
- Weather deterioration increased safety risks at two checkpoints due to poor infrastructure conditions. Concerns about shelling remained highest at one checkpoint.
Crossing the Line of Contact - Monitoring Report, March 2018DonbassFullAccess
This report provides the results of the March 2018 round of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) with the non-government-controlled area (NGCA) administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The EECPs are located in Donetsk (Maiorske, Marinka, Hnutove and Novotroitske) and Luhansk (Stanytsia Luhanska) Oblasts.
The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of the rights of the conflict-affected population within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore the reasons and concerns of those travelling between the NGCA and the government controlled area (GCA), as well as the conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through the EECPs. It should be noted that the survey results should not be directly extrapolated onto the entire population crossing the checkpoints, but it helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts.
The data collection methodology was the same at all EECPs. R2P monitors surveyed civilians queuing at the government-controlled side of EECPs in the lines for pedestrians and for vehicles both in GCA and NGCA directions. The survey was conducted anonymously and on a voluntary basis. All persons interviewed for the survey were informed about its purpose.
This report is based on the data collected from 1 to 29 March 2018 during 44 visits to the five EECPs. This reporting period is characterized by the transition to the spring schedule of operation on the government-controlled side of the EECPs (07:00 to 18:30).
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints between government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas in Ukraine. Key findings from the August 2018 survey include:
- The majority of respondents were elderly women and residents of non-government-controlled areas.
- Over half of respondents reported spending over 4 hours to cross the line of contact, with the longest wait times at Marinka checkpoint.
- Respondents' most common reasons for crossing included visiting relatives, obtaining pensions and documents, and shopping, with reasons varying by travel direction and age.
- Respondents reported that checkpoints on the non-government-controlled side took longer to pass through, except at Stanyts
This document provides a summary of a survey conducted in September 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints along the contact line between the non-government controlled area and government-controlled area in eastern Ukraine. The survey gathered information from 1,891 respondents on their demographics, reasons for crossing the contact line, frequency of crossings, and concerns about the process. Key findings include: the majority of respondents were female residents of the non-government controlled area crossing to address documents or banking issues; reasons for crossing varied depending on destination but included visiting relatives and property checks; and the longest wait times were reported at the Marinka checkpoint, where reconstruction had little effect on traffic.
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted in June 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints along the line of contact in eastern Ukraine. The following key points were reported:
- Most respondents were female elderly residents of non-government controlled areas who cross the checkpoints quarterly to access pensions and services.
- Travel to government-controlled areas was mostly to address documents issues and withdrawals, while travel to non-government areas was to visit relatives and check property.
- Crossing times averaged 2-3 hours, with the longest waits at Maiorske checkpoint. Conditions were most difficult at Stanytsia Luhanska due to a one-hour walk between checkpoints.
- Main concerns included long
Public Opinion Survey: Residents of MoldovamResearcher
The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center
for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting.
Media consumption and political preferences in Luhanska oblastDonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the results of a media consumption survey conducted in the Luhanska oblast region of Ukraine between November 2015 and March 2017. Over 28,000 respondents were interviewed across multiple regions to understand their media preferences and political views. The document outlines the methodology, sample sizes, and key findings regarding television, radio, print, online and social media usage in Luhanska oblast and some sub-regions. Television remains the most widely consumed media, while Russian and local language content is also popular alongside Ukrainian media.
Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal SurveyRatinggroup
This document summarizes the results of municipal surveys conducted in Ukraine in 2015, 2016, and 2017. It provides ratings and indexes of satisfaction for various public goods and services, opportunities, safety, and pride across different cities in Ukraine. It also includes data on satisfaction with municipal authorities. Overall, it analyzes ratings and perceptions of life in cities across several domains to understand trends over the survey periods.
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Analysis of the results of local elections 2015Rating Pro
1) According to vote tallies, Petro Poroshenko Bloc "Solidarnist" received 19.4% of the vote, Batkivshchyna received 12%, and Opposition bloc received 11.5% in the local elections for regional councils.
2) Voter turnout was less than half of eligible voters, one of the lowest rates in Ukrainian election history, despite polls showing support for more regional power.
3) Only political forces that sharply criticized the central government, such as UKROP and Batkivshchyna, were able to increase their gains compared to the 2014 parliamentary elections.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, December 2018DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted between December 13-27, 2018. It provides details on the methodology, including that a representative sample of 2,400 Ukrainians were surveyed through in-person interviews. Key findings include that 32% said they definitely intend to vote in the 2019 presidential election, with Yulia Tymoshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi emerging as the top choices for president at 16% and 11% respectively. The document also examines potential second round matchups between candidates.
Social and political moods of Ukrainians, december 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from December 13-27, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents. It found that 32% said they definitely would vote in the 2019 presidential election, while 42% said they somewhat would vote. If the election was held the following Sunday, the top candidates respondents said they would vote for were Yulia Tymoshenko at 16%, Volodymyr Zelenskyi at 11%, and Petro Poroshenko at 9%. The survey also examined potential run-off election matchups between candidates.
Ukraine National Municipal Survey, March 2015 by IRIIlya Ponomarev
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 22 regional capitals of Ukraine between March 2-20, 2015. Some key findings:
- 68% see corruption as a significant problem in their city
- 60% see nepotism as a significant problem
- 57% think Ukraine should join the EU if it could only join one economic union
- 47% would vote for Ukraine to join NATO if a referendum were held
- 35% think their city authorities are making efforts to reduce corruption at the municipal level
The survey involved over 17,000 respondents and provides insights into citizen attitudes about local governance, services, and reforms in Ukraine.
Public Opinion PollResidents of KyrgyzstanmResearcher
В исследовании приняли участие 1 483 респондентов в возрасте от 18 лет и старше – граждане, которые уже имеют право голоса на выборах. Отмечается, что выборка была однородной по возрасту, полу и прописке.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Ratinggroup
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. The survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute, with funding from the National Endowment for Democracy. A multi-stage random sample of 1,200 Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older were interviewed face-to-face.
The survey found that a majority of Ukrainians believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industrial production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a customs union with Russia. Support for the
Research which clearly shows opinion and attitude differencies between Western+Central and Southern+Eastern Ukraine. There are some questions to
- wording and formulation of questionnaire,
- some methodics of results presentation of this USA-sponsoring research,
but anyway that shows the whole picture
Звіт Міжнародного республіканського інституту США щодо ситуації в УкраїніmResearcher
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from November 15 to December 14, 2017. It provides details on:
- The national sample of 2,400 residents surveyed throughout Ukraine, excluding occupied territories.
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 residents each in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The multi-stage probability sampling method used to select respondents randomly from cities and villages proportionally.
- Response rates ranged from 58% to 76.2% and margins of error were below 2.8% for city samples and 1.7% for the national sample.
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) along the line of contact in eastern Ukraine in October 2018. Some key findings include:
- The majority (87%) of respondents were residents of the non-government controlled area (NGCA) and crossed primarily to deal with documents/payments or visit relatives.
- Most respondents (58%) spent 4-5 hours crossing, with the longest times at Marinka EECP. Crossing typically took longer on the NGCA side except at Stanytsia Luhanska.
- Reconstruction continued at two EECPs during the reporting period, leading to changes in lines and crossing times.
This report summarizes the results of a survey conducted in October 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints in eastern Ukraine. The survey explored the motivations and concerns of people traveling between government-controlled and non-government controlled areas of Ukraine. Key findings include:
- The majority (87%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas, with most traveling to solve document or payment issues, visit relatives, or withdraw cash.
- Reconstruction was ongoing at two checkpoints during the reporting period, leading to longer wait times at some locations.
- Over half of respondents spent 4-5 hours crossing checkpoints, with the longest wait times at the Marinka checkpoint.
Serzh Sargsyan leads in the polls ahead of Armenia's February 2013 presidential election, receiving around 44% of the vote according to survey results. Raffi Hovhannisyan has established himself as the leading opposition candidate with around 20% support, more than all other candidates combined. While not all parties nominated a candidate, high voter turnout is expected with around 73% saying they will certainly vote. Sargsyan receives the highest ratings for experience and political power, while Hovhannisyan is seen as more caring, credible, and likeable, though voters trust Sargsyan's political program and party affiliation more. The election seems poised for Sargsyan to win in the first round, though
The second nationwide TNS opinion poll was carried out between 31 January and 5 February 2013 by its local partner IPSC. The poll was commissioned by European Friends of Armenia (www.EuFoA.org) in order to contribute to a factual debate ahead of the elections. The sample size of the survey is 1,609.
The survey was conducted September 12–25, 2014 by Rating Group Ukraine and Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organizationon behalf of the International Republican Institute.
Data from the first wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were more likely to expect dialogue and negotiations rather than intensification of military operations to resolve the conflict within the year.
- A majority saw continued military activities by self-proclaimed separatist groups as worsening the problem, while international negotiations and sanctions on Russia were viewed as potentially helping to solve it.
- Payment of pensions in non-government controlled areas and introducing a federal system of governance in Ukraine had mixed views, while elections in separatist areas before control and separation from Ukraine were largely unacceptable.
Municipal survey_May 2023_ENG - FINAL.pdfRatinggroup
The document summarizes the results of the eighth annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey conducted in April-May 2023. It was administered in 21 regional capitals not under Russian control, to a sample of 16,800 respondents. Key findings include:
- Over half of respondents believe things in their city are going in the right direction, though this varies between 39-82% across cities.
- Most respondents said their household's economic situation stayed the same (34-45%) or worsened (27-43%) over the past year.
- Respondents were cautiously optimistic about Ukraine's economic prospects, with most expecting the situation to improve (25-38%) or stay the same (22-36%) in the next
Crossing the line of contact. Monitoring report, July 2018DonbassFullAccess
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted in July 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints along the line of contact in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings include:
- The majority of respondents were elderly women traveling to visit relatives or check on property in the non-government controlled area.
- It took respondents an average of 2-3 hours to pass through all checkpoints, with the longest wait times at the Maiorske checkpoint.
- The most common reasons for travel to the government-controlled area were to avoid payment suspensions, handle document issues, shop for food and clothes, and go on vacation.
2014 july 25 public opinion survey residents of moldova, june 7-27, 2014Rasa Alisauskiene
The survey was conducted in Moldova from June 7-27, 2014 with 1,200 respondents through face-to-face interviews. It is representative of Moldova's population by age, gender, education, region and settlement size. The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. Growing support for democracy was found, with satisfaction in democracy increasing and more believing the country is heading in the right direction. However, corruption and economic problems remain top concerns.
FUTURE AND THE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PROFILE EVENTSUIFuture
In anticipation of 2017 respondents pondered over events that might happen next year. 37.2% don't expect any fundamental changes, but 23.9% believe that next year early parliamentary elections will be held, and 17.2% think that there will be early presidential election, whereas 7.6% predict a violent overthrow of Poroshenko. One in ten anticipates that in 2017 Russia will begin a new military advance in Ukraine. Comfortingly, there is a part of the respondents optimistic about the next year: 21.6% expect the emergence of new political leaders who will change the country for the better, and 12.1% expect that there will be stabilization and economic growth in Ukraine.
This report is the fourth round of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the non-governmentcontrolled area (NGCA) administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of rights of the conflict-affected population within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore reasons and concerns of those travelling between the NGCA and the government-controlled area (GCA), as well as the conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through EECPs. The information collected in the survey helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts.
This report is based on data collected during December 2017 – January 2018, which is characterized by the holidays and deteriorating winter weather conditions.
Similar to New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, May - June 2018 (20)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
The document analyzes violations of electoral rights that occurred during elections in liberated territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in Ukraine. It describes violations during the 2014 extraordinary presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 2015 local elections, including obstacles to voting, violence against election officials, and criminal interference. The document highlights issues preventing internally displaced persons from exercising their right to vote and proposes solutions like allowing voters to change their voting address without changing their official place of residence, to integrate displaced people into their new communities while preserving electoral rights.
The document provides background information on Popasna, Ukraine and summarizes key events regarding its occupation and liberation during the 2014 conflict. It describes how Popasna came under the control of pro-Russian separatist forces in May 2014 but was liberated by Ukrainian troops on July 22, 2014. However, Popasna remained strategically important and faced repeated artillery attacks from separatists using Grads and other rocket launchers throughout the remainder of 2014, resulting in civilian casualties and property damage. The document lists numerous specific dates of artillery attacks on the city during this period.
The town of Mariinka has been at the center of conflict in eastern Ukraine since 2014. It has been repeatedly shelled by Russian-led forces, leading to numerous civilian casualties and widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure. Although a ceasefire was agreed to in Minsk, the shelling of Mariinka has continued on a near daily basis. As a result, many residents have been forced to evacuate while others live in difficult conditions, lacking basic services. Over four years of conflict, 41 residents have been killed according to official data. The constant shelling of civilian areas like Mariinka may constitute war crimes under international law.
Digest by Ukrainian Helsinki Human rights Union, April 2019DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the activities of the USAID Human Rights in Action Program implemented by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union in April 2019. It discusses the program's work on human rights monitoring, advocacy, strategic litigation, free legal aid provision, and human rights education. Key events covered include Russia simplifying citizenship for eastern Ukrainians, and the PACE keeping sanctions on Russia in place.
Discover the cutting-edge telemetry solution implemented for Alan Wake 2 by Remedy Entertainment in collaboration with AWS. This comprehensive presentation dives into our objectives, detailing how we utilized advanced analytics to drive gameplay improvements and player engagement.
Key highlights include:
Primary Goals: Implementing gameplay and technical telemetry to capture detailed player behavior and game performance data, fostering data-driven decision-making.
Tech Stack: Leveraging AWS services such as EKS for hosting, WAF for security, Karpenter for instance optimization, S3 for data storage, and OpenTelemetry Collector for data collection. EventBridge and Lambda were used for data compression, while Glue ETL and Athena facilitated data transformation and preparation.
Data Utilization: Transforming raw data into actionable insights with technologies like Glue ETL (PySpark scripts), Glue Crawler, and Athena, culminating in detailed visualizations with Tableau.
Achievements: Successfully managing 700 million to 1 billion events per month at a cost-effective rate, with significant savings compared to commercial solutions. This approach has enabled simplified scaling and substantial improvements in game design, reducing player churn through targeted adjustments.
Community Engagement: Enhanced ability to engage with player communities by leveraging precise data insights, despite having a small community management team.
This presentation is an invaluable resource for professionals in game development, data analytics, and cloud computing, offering insights into how telemetry and analytics can revolutionize player experience and game performance optimization.
PyData London 2024: Mistakes were made (Dr. Rebecca Bilbro)Rebecca Bilbro
To honor ten years of PyData London, join Dr. Rebecca Bilbro as she takes us back in time to reflect on a little over ten years working as a data scientist. One of the many renegade PhDs who joined the fledgling field of data science of the 2010's, Rebecca will share lessons learned the hard way, often from watching data science projects go sideways and learning to fix broken things. Through the lens of these canon events, she'll identify some of the anti-patterns and red flags she's learned to steer around.
Discovering Digital Process Twins for What-if Analysis: a Process Mining Appr...Marlon Dumas
This webinar discusses the limitations of traditional approaches for business process simulation based on had-crafted model with restrictive assumptions. It shows how process mining techniques can be assembled together to discover high-fidelity digital twins of end-to-end processes from event data.
We are pleased to share with you the latest VCOSA statistical report on the cotton and yarn industry for the month of May 2024.
Starting from January 2024, the full weekly and monthly reports will only be available for free to VCOSA members. To access the complete weekly report with figures, charts, and detailed analysis of the cotton fiber market in the past week, interested parties are kindly requested to contact VCOSA to subscribe to the newsletter.
2. Methodology
2
• The survey was conducted by Rating Group Ukraine on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in
Survey Research.
• The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine (except for the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas) from May 26–June
10, 2018, through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes.
• The sample consisted of 2,400 permanent residents of Ukraine aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. It is representative of
the general population by gender, age, region, and settlement size. The distribution of population by regions and settlements
is based on statistical data of the Central Election Commission from the 2014 parliamentary elections, and the distribution of
population by age and gender is based on data from the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine from January 1, 2017.
• A multi-stage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday methods for respondent
selection.
• Stage One: The territory of Ukraine was split into 25 administrative regions (24 regions of Ukraine and Kyiv). The survey
was conducted throughout all regions of Ukraine, with the exception of the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas.
• Stage Two: The selection of settlements was based on towns and villages. Towns were grouped into subtypes according
to their size:
• Cities with populations of more than 1 million
• Cities with populations of between 500,000-999,000
• Cities with populations of between 100,000-499,000
• Cities with populations of between 50,000-99,000
• Cities with populations of up to 50,000
• Villages
Cities and villages were selected by the PPS method (probability proportional to size). The number of selected
cities/villages in each region is proportional to the share of population living in cities/villages of a certain type in each
region.
• Stage Three: Households were selected by the random route method, and respondents were selected by the “last
birthday” rule.
• The margin of error does not exceed 2.0 percent for the full sample.
• The response rate is 62.7 percent.
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
• The survey was financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
3. 3
*Due to the Russian occupation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, residents of Crimea and the so-
called separatist-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts (“the Donbas”) were not surveyed in this poll.
Geographical Key
5. Generally speaking, do you think that things in Ukraine are going
in the right direction or wrong direction?
5
13% 14%
15%
18%
34%
29%
15%
17%
15%
11%
13%
11%
13%
18%
16%
14%
15% 15%
71%
66%
69%
64%
48%
51%
72%
68%
70%
76%
71% 72% 72%
68% 67%
71% 71% 70%
16%
20%
16%
17% 18%
20%
13%
15% 15%
13% 15%
17%
15%
15%
17%
15%
14% 15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Nov
2011
May
2012
May
2013
Feb
2014
April
2014
Sept
2014
July
2015
Sept
2015
Nov
2015
Feb
2016
June
2016
Sept
2016
April
2017
June
2017
Sept
2017
Dec
2017
March
2018
June
2018
Right direction Wrong direction Difficult to answer/No answer
6. Generally speaking, do you think that things in Ukraine are going
in the right direction or wrong direction?
6
(Disaggregated by age, region)
13%
17%
16%
10%
12%
16%
20%
74%
70%
66%
70%
78%
69%
65%
14%
13%
18%
20%
11%
16%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Right direction Wrong direction Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
11. Do you intend to vote in the parliamentary elections scheduled
for October 2019?
11
32%
36%
7%
16%
9%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
12. 12
(Disaggregated by age, region)
38%
29%
26%
30%
34%
35%
28%
36%
34%
38%
27%
26%
36%
50%
5%
6%
11%
13%
7%
6%
6%
12%
20%
17%
18%
23%
12%
12%
9%
10%
8%
12%
10%
11%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you intend to vote in the parliamentary elections scheduled
for October 2019?
RegionAge
14. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, which
party would you vote for?
14
20%
18%
6%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
4%
4%
5%
6%
6%
6%
7%
11%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Nash Krai
People's Front
Movement of New Forces
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
UKROP
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Svoboda
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP Solidarnist
Radical Party
Opposition Bloc
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
(All respondents)
15. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, which
political party would you vote for?
15
(Among likely voters; n=1,630)
19%
6%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
3%
5%
5%
7%
8%
8%
8%
9%
15%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Right Sector
Justice
Nash Krai
People's Front
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Movement of New Forces
UKROP
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Svoboda
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Radical Party
Opposition Bloc
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP) Solidarnist
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
16. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, which other
political party would you vote for if the party that you have
chosen above would not participate in the elections?
16
37%
21%
5%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
4%
4%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Diya of Yarosh
Right Sector
National Corps
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Socialist Party
Democratic Alliance
Movement of New Forces
Nash Krai
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP) Solidarnist
Khvylya (Wave) Party
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
People's Front
Svoboda
UKROP
Justice
Opposition Bloc
Civic Position
Radical Party
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
(All respondents)
17. 17
(Likely voters; n=1,630)
42%
7%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3%
4%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Diya of Yarosh
Right Sector
National Corps
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Democratic Alliance
Socialist Party
Movement of New Forces
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Nash Krai
Khvylya (Wave) Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP) Solidarnist
People's Front
Svoboda
UKROP
Justice
Opposition Bloc
Radical Party
Civic Position
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Self-Reliance (Samopomich)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, which other
political party would you vote for if the party that you have
chosen above would not participate in the elections?
22. 22
What do state authorities need to do to increase your trust in
them?
71%
45%
31%
26%
24%
22%
22%
9%
8%
7%
4%
3%
2%
3%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
End the war in the Donbas
Improve the economy
Fight corruption and reform the judiciary
Create jobs
Increase pensions and social assistance
Increase salaries
Improve healthcare services
Return Crimea to Ukraine
Improve infrastructure (e.g. roads)
Fight crime
Improve education services
Improve relations with Russia
Focus on closer integration with the West (EU and NATO)
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Up to three responses permitted)
23. 23
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
End the war in the Donbas 71% 68% 73% 62% 74% 76% 71%
Improve the economy 49% 46% 41% 47% 42% 49% 40%
Fight corruption and reform the
judiciary
34% 32% 29% 29% 39% 25% 27%
Create jobs 31% 26% 22% 30% 21% 31% 23%
Increase pensions and social
assistance
13% 17% 38% 25% 28% 21% 23%
Increase salaries 22% 28% 19% 24% 21% 21% 24%
Improve healthcare services 19% 22% 24% 16% 24% 22% 27%
Return Crimea to Ukraine 10% 10% 7% 10% 10% 6% 9%
Improve infrastructure (e.g. roads) 9% 9% 6% 11% 7% 6% 7%
Fight crime 7% 6% 8% 9% 7% 8% 3%
Improve education services 7% 4% 3% 5% 4% 2% 6%
Improve relations with Russia 3% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 6%
Focus on closer integration with the
West (EU and NATO)
3% 2% 2% 5% 2% 1% 2%
Other 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 5% 6%
Difficult to answer/No answer 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1%
(Up to three responses permitted; disaggregated by age, region)
What do state authorities need to do to increase your trust in
them?
24. 24
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
BPP
Solidarnist
CivicPosition
ForLifeParty
(ZaZhyttia)
Self-Reliance
Party
Opposition
Bloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
Servantofthe
People
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
End the war in the Donbas 72% 75% 69% 74% 67% 76% 78% 72% 72% 71% 67%
Improve the economy 41% 44% 44% 47% 41% 45% 43% 42% 48% 44% 47%
Fight corruption and reform the
judiciary
29% 36% 39% 31% 42% 23% 28% 38% 32% 28% 33%
Create jobs 26% 27% 14% 27% 38% 27% 24% 22% 25% 31% 25%
Increase pensions and social
assistance
31% 13% 27% 30% 19% 26% 33% 29% 14% 23% 22%
Increase salaries 29% 17% 19% 19% 27% 22% 22% 32% 22% 25% 21%
Improve healthcare services 25% 25% 25% 27% 17% 27% 24% 7% 14% 21% 19%
Return Crimea to Ukraine 8% 18% 4% 5% 8% 4% 9% 11% 19% 8% 7%
Improve infrastructure (e.g.
roads)
7% 7% 11% 6% 6% 4% 5% 13% 10% 8% 6%
Fight crime 5% 10% 11% 6% 9% 5% 8% 9% 6% 6% 7%
Improve education services 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2% 3% 8% 6% 4% 5%
Improve relations with Russia 2% 1% 2% 9% 0% 12% 0% 0% 4% 3% 2%
Focus on closer integration with
the West (EU and NATO)
3% 1% 6% 1% 3% 0% 3% 5% 1% 1% 1%
Other 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 7% 1% 2% 7% 5% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 0% 2% 3%
(Up to three responses permitted; disaggregated by political party preference)
What do state authorities need to do to increase your trust in
them?
31. Which three of the following issues are the most important for
Ukraine?
31
53%
49%
28%
27%
26%
20%
17%
16%
11%
9%
8%
8%
4%
4%
4%
3%
3%
1%
2%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Military conflict in Donbas
Corruption within the state bodies
Growth of prices
Low industry production
Unemployment
Government incompetence
Political instability
Social protection for the poor
Healthcare
Crime
Hryvnia devaluation
Relations with Russia
Russian presence in the Crimea
Lack of/possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Delay in salary/pension payments
Environment
Rights to land ownership
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
32. Which three of the following issues are the most important for you
personally?
32
65%
30%
28%
25%
24%
21%
21%
11%
11%
9%
8%
8%
5%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
5%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Growth of prices
Military conflict in Donbas
Unemployment
Healthcare
Social protection for the poor
Hryvnia devaluation
Corruption within the state bodies
Low industry production
Government incompetence
Crime
Political instability
Delay in salary/pension payments
Lack of/possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Environment
Relations with Russia
Rights to land ownership
Russian presence in the Crimea
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
33. Considering long-term trends, what has the greatest likelihood of
threatening your way of life and your children’s future?
33
51%
12%
11%
7%
7%
2%
2%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60%
War/expansion of the conflict in Ukraine
Bankruptcy and the disappearance of health and social security
systems
Collapse of banks, financial system, and general economic
collapse
Terrorism, extremism, and political violence
Loss of culture, values, and the way of life we grew up with
Climate change
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
34. Considering long-term trends, what has the greatest likelihood of
threatening your way of life and your children’s future?
34
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
War/the expansion of the conflict in Ukraine 49% 49% 54% 49% 49% 54% 55%
Bankruptcy and disappearance of health and
social security systems
10% 12% 13% 12% 13% 9% 13%
Collapse of banks, financial system, and general
economic collapse
13% 12% 10% 9% 10% 17% 8%
Terrorism, extremism, and political violence 9% 6% 7% 12% 8% 5% 5%
Loss of culture, values, and the way of life we
grew up with
7% 8% 7% 6% 9% 5% 9%
Climate change 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2%
Other 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 8% 6% 5% 8% 7% 5% 5%
(Disaggregated by age, region)
36. 36
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
36%
37%
32%
40%
42%
41%
52%
53%
59%
55%
57%
57%
55%
54%
51%
53%
54%
52%
50%
52%
52%
43%
41%
42%
37%
37%
36%
27%
24%
17%
14%
17%
15%
15%
15%
19%
18%
18%
14%
16%
18%
15%
4%
5%
6%
5%
5%
9%
6%
10%
9%
12%
12%
12%
14%
12%
14%
14%
8%
9%
10%
15%
17%
17%
17%
20%
18%
17%
14%
14%
13%
15%
20%
14%
16%
15%
19%
17%
15%
20%
24%
24%
14%
16%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2012
May 2012
September 2012
May 2013
September 2013
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
European Union Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan Other Difficult to answer/No answer
37. 37
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
(Disaggregated by age, region)
80%
54%
35%
26%
63%
53%
42%
2%
10%
27%
30%
9%
13%
21%
7%
18%
20%
25%
15%
18%
17%
11%
18%
18%
19%
12%
16%
19%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
West
Center
South
East
18-35
36-50
51+
European Union Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan Other Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
38. 38
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
(Disaggregated by political party preference)
89%
78%
77%
66%
64%
63%
53%
17%
15%
39%
50%
3%
2%
4%
12%
11%
9%
9%
49%
48%
18%
11%
2%
11%
12%
11%
11%
12%
17%
20%
23%
26%
16%
6%
9%
7%
11%
15%
15%
21%
15%
14%
17%
23%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
BPP Solidarnist
Self-Reliance Party
Svoboda
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Servant of the People
Radical Party
Opposition Bloc
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Would not vote
Undecided
European Union Customs Union Other Difficult to answer
39. 39
In your opinion, what would be the greatest benefit that Ukraine
would receive through membership in the European Union?
32%
25%
17%
17%
6%
1%
2%
<1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Access to the common market and border-free travel
Security and stability
Financial aid coming from the EU
Support for democratic governance and rule of law
Support of European culture and values
Other
Difficult to answer
No answer
(EU integration supporters; n=1,242)
40. 40
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Access to the common market and border-
free travel
36% 34% 26% 32% 32% 33% 30%
Security and stability 22% 21% 30% 21% 27% 26% 29%
Financial aid coming from the EU 15% 17% 19% 23% 14% 13% 13%
Support for democratic governance and
rule of law
17% 21% 15% 14% 19% 19% 18%
Support of European culture and values 7% 4% 7% 6% 7% 6% 2%
Other 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4%
Don’t know 2% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% 3%
No answer - 1% - - - - -
In your opinion, what would the greatest benefit be that Ukraine
would receive through membership in the European Union?
(EU integration supporters; n=1,242; disaggregated by age, region)
41. If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
41
34%
38%
43%
41%
48%
48%
45%
39%
43%
46%
40%
34%
37%
43%
43%
43%
40%
31%
30%
28%
30%
30%
32%
29%
27%
27%
26%
26%
33%
33%
9%
7%
17%
14%
8%
10%
10%
12%
11%
12%
12%
15%
12%
7%
8%
13%
15%
8%
15%
17%
13%
16%
17%
17%
14%
22%
24%
26%
17%
16%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
Would vote for Ukraine to join NATO Would vote against Ukraine joining NATO Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
42. (Disaggregated by age, region)
If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
42
73%
45%
25%
18%
50%
44%
37%
10%
29%
48%
57%
28%
31%
39%
4%
6%
13%
11%
7%
10%
7%
13%
20%
14%
14%
15%
16%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
West
Center
South
East
18-35
36-50
51+
Would vote for Ukraine to join NATO Would vote against Ukraine joining NATO Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
43. (Disaggregated by political party preference)
If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
43
81%
80%
77%
61%
51%
49%
44%
10%
9%
30%
39%
13%
4%
6%
22%
28%
27%
25%
73%
69%
40%
31%
3%
4%
4%
8%
6%
13%
9%
7%
8%
14%
7%
3%
11%
13%
9%
15%
11%
22%
10%
14%
17%
22%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Svoboda
BPP Solidarnist
Self-Reliance Party
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Servant of the People
Radical Party
Opposition Bloc
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Would not vote
Undecided
European Union Customs Union Other Difficult to answer
45. How would you assess your level of understanding of the
healthcare reform led by acting Minister of Healthcare Ulana
Suprun?
45
8%
27%
28%
31%
6%
I fully understand it
I somewhat understand it
I don't really understand it
I don’t understand it at all
Difficult to answer/No answer
46. 46
(Disaggregated by age, region)
How would you assess your level of understanding of the
healthcare reform led by acting Minister of Healthcare Ulana
Suprun?
7%
8%
8%
6%
12%
8%
6%
21%
32%
31%
22%
17%
24%
41%
31%
27%
26%
25%
25%
33%
27%
36%
26%
27%
43%
36%
27%
20%
5%
8%
8%
4%
10%
8%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
South
East
Center
West
I fully understand it I somewhat understand it I don't really understand it
I don’t understand it at all Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
47. 47
4%
13%
24%
44%
15%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you support healthcare reform, the implementation of which
began on April 1, 2018, led by acting Minister of Health Ulana
Suprun?
48. Do you support healthcare reform, the implementation of which
began on April 1, 2018, led by acting Minister of Health Ulana
Suprun?
48
2%
7%
4%
4%
31%
14%
26%
21%
24%
52%
34%
44%
16%
7%
15%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Do not understand healthcare reform; n=1,411
Understand healthcare reform; n=832
All respondents; n=2,400
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by level of knowledge of healthcare reform)
49. 49
(Disaggregated by age, region)
Do you support healthcare reform, the implementation of which
began on April 1, 2018, led by acting Minister of Health Ulana
Suprun?
3%
4%
3%
4%
3%
4%
4%
12%
13%
16%
6%
8%
13%
26%
23%
25%
23%
20%
20%
26%
25%
50%
42%
37%
62%
52%
41%
25%
12%
15%
21%
8%
17%
16%
21%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
South
East
Center
West
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
51. Did you attend a demonstration or related event during the
Revolution of Dignity (EuroMaidan) in 2013/2014?
51
11%
46%
35%
8%
Yes
No, I sympathized with the cause but did
not participate in any events
No, I did not sympathize with the cause
Difficult to answer/No answer
52. 9%
12%
14%
2%
2%
16%
17%
45%
45%
47%
35%
25%
61%
52%
40%
35%
31%
57%
59%
16%
24%
6%
9%
9%
6%
14%
7%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
South
East
West
Center
Yes
No, I sympathized with the cause but did not participate in any events
No, I did not sympathize with the cause
Difficult to answer/No answer
52
(Disaggregated by age, region)
Did you attend a demonstration or related event during the
Revolution of Dignity (EuroMaidan) in 2013/2014?
RegionAge
53. How likely would you be these days to attend a demonstration or
related event if you sympathized with the cause?
53
7%
17%
19%
37%
20%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
54. 54
2%
6%
34%
7%
8%
22%
33%
17%
16%
25%
12%
19%
62%
25%
9%
37%
12%
22%
12%
20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Did not sympathize with the cause and did not
participate in any events; n=853
Sympathized with the cause but did not
participate in any events; n=853
Participated in events related to Revolution of
Dignity; n=264
All respondents; n=2,400
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
How likely would you be these days to attend a demonstration or
related event if you sympathized with the cause?
(Disaggregated by participation in the 2013/2014 Revolution of Dignity)
55. 55
(Disaggregated by age, region)
How likely would you be these days to attend a demonstration or
related event if you sympathized with the cause?
5%
7%
10%
3%
3%
9%
11%
13%
21%
20%
9%
10%
16%
31%
19%
21%
17%
18%
18%
23%
16%
44%
31%
32%
41%
57%
29%
25%
19%
21%
21%
30%
13%
23%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
RegionAge
57. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
57
4%
4%
3%
9%
45%
53%
5%
8%
15%
13%
25%
23%
22%
25%
23%
25%
9%
7%
57%
51%
32%
39%
7%
6%
13%
11%
28%
14%
14%
11%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are the lawful protection
of Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine
Citizens of Ukraine whose native language is Russian are
under pressure or threat because of their language
During the last two years the GDP of Ukraine has grown
The war in the Donbas is an internal Ukrainian conflict
The war in the Donbas was launched by Russia and local
pro-Russian groups
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are an illegal invasion and
occupation of independent Ukraine
Fully agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Completely disagree Difficult to answer/No answer
58. 58
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are an illegal
invasion and occupation of independent Ukraine
78% 77% 74% 89% 85% 69% 48%
The war in the Donbas was launched by Russia
and local pro-Russian groups
72% 70% 67% 88% 79% 63% 31%
The war in the Donbas is an internal Ukrainian
conflict
19% 25% 22% 11% 18% 33% 30%
During the last two years the GDP of Ukraine has
grown
17% 19% 16% 19% 17% 19% 11%
Citizens of Ukraine whose native language is
Russian are under pressure or threat because of
their language
11% 15% 12% 7% 7% 19% 22%
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are the lawful
protection of Russian-speaking citizens of
Ukraine
8% 11% 8% 4% 6% 14% 15%
(“Fully agree” and “somewhat agree” combined; disaggregated by age, region)
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
59. 59
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ForLifeParty
(ZaZhyttia)
Self-Reliance
Party
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
Servantofthe
People
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are
an illegal invasion and occupation of
independent Ukraine
85% 91% 89% 56% 91% 54% 86% 96% 84% 70% 72%
The war in the Donbas was launched
by Russia and local pro-Russian
groups.
81% 90% 85% 47% 87% 48% 77% 89% 74% 61% 66%
The war in the Donbas is an internal
Ukrainian conflict
15% 16% 16% 37% 15% 39% 10% 14% 21% 26% 21%
During the last two years the GDP of
Ukraine has grown
21% 48% 15% 16% 26% 15% 17% 17% 21% 11% 11%
Citizens of Ukraine whose native
language is Russian are under
pressure or threat because of their
language
10% 5% 7% 23% 7% 30% 8% 9% 14% 14% 9%
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are
the lawful protection of Russian-
speaking citizens of Ukraine
7% 1% 7% 21% 6% 27% 3% - 9% 11% 5%
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
(“Fully agree” and “somewhat agree” combined; disaggregated by age, region)
60. 60
Watch news on Ukrainian
TV channels at least
once a month
Watch news on Russian
TV channels at least
once a month
Watch news on Western
TV channels at least
once a month
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are an illegal
invasion and occupation of independent Ukraine
80% 66% 75%
The war in the Donbas was launched by Russia and
local pro-Russian groups.
73% 55% 68%
The war in the Donbas is an internal Ukrainian
conflict
21% 26% 23%
During the last two years the GDP of Ukraine has
grown
18% 19% 29%
Citizens of Ukraine whose native language is
Russian are under pressure or threat because of
their language
12% 16% 13%
Russia’s actions toward Crimea are the lawful
protection of Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine
8% 14% 14%
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
(“Fully agree” and “somewhat agree” combined; disaggregated by media consumption)
62. Do you support the establishment of the Autocephalous Orthodox
Ukrainian Church*?
62
20%
19%
11%
18%
32%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
* Autocephaly would establish a united Ukrainian Orthodox Church independent from the Moscow Patriarchate.
63. 63
Do you support the establishment of the Autocephalous Orthodox
Ukrainian Church?
8%
17%
16%
23%
31%
20%
14%
8%
14%
32%
26%
19%
16%
12%
11%
13%
9%
11%
36%
24%
18%
6%
10%
18%
26%
39%
41%
26%
25%
32%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Orthodox, Moscow Patriarchate
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any
religion
Greek Catholic
Orthodox, Kyiv Patriarchate
All respondents
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by religious affiliation)
65. 65
Over the last five years, have you traveled outside of your city
and, if so, how often?
44%
82%
83%
89%
38%
14%
13%
8%
16%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
2%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
To other regions of Ukraine
To countries in the
Commonwealth of
Independent States
To countries of Europe
To resorts in Egypt, Turkey,
etc.
No, not during the past five years Yes, once or several times Yes, many times Difficult to answer/No answer
67. 67
How often have you watched TV news during last three months
from the following sources?
2%
6%
54%
6%
8%
25%
6%
7%
7%
8%
7%
4%
68%
64%
8%
10%
8%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Western TV channels
Russian TV channels
Ukrainian TV channels
Almost everyday Several times a week
Several times a month Less often
Not a single time during last three months Difficult to answer/No answer
68. 68
In your opinion, how often do TV channels distort information
about the situation in Ukraine?
6%
33%
24%
9%
14%
38%
7%
3%
13%
6%
1%
5%
9%
6%
4%
63%
44%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Western TV channels
Russian TV channels
Ukrainian TV channels
Almost always Sometimes Rarely Almost never Never Difficult to answer/No answer
69. 69
In your opinion, how often do TV channels distort information
about the situation in Ukraine?
(Among respondents who answered)
17%
58%
28%
23%
25%
45%
18%
5%
16%
17%
2%
6%
25%
10%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Western TV channels;
n=893
Russian TV channels;
n=1,355
Ukrainian TV channels;
n=2,029
Almost always Sometimes Rarely Almost never Never
70. 70
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Ukrainian TV channels?
46%
39%
35%
34%
23%
13%
12%
3%
10%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Political news in Ukraine
Military activities in the Donbas
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine
Realization of reforms in Ukraine
Performance of the national authorities of Ukraine
Performance of local authorities in Ukraine
International situation
Other
Information is usually presented in an objective way
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
71. 71
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Political news in Ukraine 45% 51% 44% 45% 41% 54% 49%
Military activities in the Donbas 39% 40% 38% 38% 35% 38% 50%
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine 34% 35% 35% 34% 33% 37% 36%
Realization of reforms in Ukraine 32% 35% 35% 34% 32% 38% 33%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
22% 24% 22% 20% 25% 19% 27%
Performance of local authorities
in Ukraine
13% 15% 13% 15% 12% 12% 17%
International situation 11% 13% 12% 14% 10% 11% 16%
Other 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 1% 5%
Information is usually presented
in an objective way
10% 9% 11% 17% 11% 7% 4%
Difficult to answer/No answer 21% 16% 18% 19% 21% 14% 19%
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by age, region)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Ukrainian TV channels?
72. 72
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ForLifeParty
(ZaZhyttia)
Self-RelianceParty
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
ServantofthePeople
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
Political news in Ukraine 46% 37% 47% 55% 45% 55% 41% 45% 52% 50% 46%
Military activities in the
Donbas
36% 26% 40% 46% 37% 48% 34% 40% 45% 45% 36%
Anti-corruption efforts in
Ukraine
33% 21% 44% 41% 37% 44% 26% 37% 39% 36% 33%
Realization of reforms in
Ukraine
35% 25% 40% 44% 38% 37% 32% 34% 32% 35% 30%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
19% 13% 24% 26% 20% 29% 23% 21% 25% 25% 25%
Performance of local
authorities in Ukraine
13% 9% 13% 16% 11% 14% 11% 22% 16% 13% 11%
International situation 12% 9% 10% 18% 13% 15% 12% 12% 18% 12% 9%
Other 5% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 4% 3% 2%
Information is usually
presented in an objective way
15% 20% 15% 5% 21% 7% 14% 7% 10% 5% 7%
Difficult to answer/No answer 18% 24% 11% 11% 12% 14% 21% 18% 15% 18% 24%
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by political party preference)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Ukrainian TV channels?
73. 73
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Russian TV channels?
41%
35%
21%
13%
10%
10%
8%
3%
2%
47%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Military activities in the Donbas
Political news in Ukraine
International situation
Performance of the national authorities of Ukraine
Realization of reforms in Ukraine
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine
Performance of local authorities in Ukraine
Other
Information is usually presented in an objective way
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
74. 74
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by age, region)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Russian TV channels?
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Military activities in the Donbas 45% 45% 35% 57% 35% 36% 34%
Political news in Ukraine 37% 38% 32% 45% 33% 31% 32%
International situation 25% 23% 18% 32% 20% 18% 12%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
15% 13% 12% 18% 16% 6% 11%
Realization of reforms in Ukraine 12% 11% 8% 15% 13% 4% 6%
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine 11% 10% 8% 12% 13% 3% 7%
Performance of local authorities
in Ukraine
10% 8% 6% 11% 10% 2% 7%
Other 3% 5% 2% 6% 2% 1% 2%
Information is usually presented
in an objective way
1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 44% 43% 51% 34% 53% 52% 48%
75. 75
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by political party preference)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Russian TV channels?
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ForLifeParty
(ZaZhyttia)
Self-RelianceParty
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
ServantofthePeople
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
Military activities in the
Donbas
44% 50% 50% 37% 50% 36% 41% 61% 48% 39% 30%
Political news in Ukraine 37% 43% 47% 28% 40% 31% 34% 54% 39% 35% 29%
International situation 23% 33% 23% 10% 23% 22% 23% 46% 20% 23% 15%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
14% 22% 19% 7% 14% 12% 15% 26% 17% 9% 8%
Realization of reforms in
Ukraine
8% 20% 17% 6% 16% 10% 8% 18% 15% 8% 7%
Anti-corruption efforts in
Ukraine
10% 18% 11% 2% 13% 8% 8% 25% 10% 8% 6%
Performance of local
authorities in Ukraine
8% 19% 10% 3% 10% 9% 5% 21% 7% 6% 5%
Other 5% 6% 2% - 2% 1% 2% 11% 4% 3% 1%
Information is usually
presented in an objective way
3% 2% - 2% 3% 4% 2% - 2% 2% -
Difficult to answer/No answer 42% 39% 37% 49% 38% 49% 46% 24% 36% 49% 58%
76. 76
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Western TV channels?
8%
8%
6%
3%
2%
2%
1%
2%
13%
68%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
International situation
Political news in Ukraine
Military activities in the Donbas
Realization of reforms in Ukraine
Performance of the national authorities of Ukraine
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine
Performance of local authorities in Ukraine
Other
Information is usually presented in an objective way
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
77. 77
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by age, region)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Western TV channels?
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
International situation 10% 9% 7% 14% 7% 5% 8%
Political news in Ukraine 9% 10% 6% 8% 6% 7% 13%
Military activities in the Donbas 8% 6% 5% 10% 3% 5% 8%
Realization of reforms in Ukraine 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 5%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 4%
Anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine 3% 3% 1% 4% 2% - 3%
Performance of local authorities
in Ukraine
1% 1% 1% 2% - - 2%
Other 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 1% 3%
Information is usually presented
in an objective way
17% 13% 9% 21% 12% 11% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 63% 66% 74% 56% 72% 73% 72%
78. 78
(Multiple responses permitted; disaggregated by political party preference)
In your opinion, news information on which topics is most often
distorted on Western TV channels?
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ForLifeParty
(ZaZhyttia)
Self-RelianceParty
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
ServantofthePeople
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
International situation 15% 8% 8% 11% 11% 9% 7% 12% 5% 8% 5%
Political news in Ukraine 9% 5% 12% 9% 6% 4% 7% 16% 11% 6% 8%
Military activities in the
Donbas
8% 9% 9% 6% 9% 4% 4% 12% 8% 3% 4%
Realization of reforms in
Ukraine
4% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% - 4% 2% 2%
Performance of the national
authorities of Ukraine
3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% - 9% 1% 1%
Anti-corruption efforts in
Ukraine
2% 4% 1% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1%
Performance of local
authorities in Ukraine
1% 2% 3% - 2% 1% 1% - 3% 1% -
Other 5% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 3% - 3% 3% 2%
Information is usually
presented in an objective way
16% 20% 17% 7% 20% 7% 10% 19% 18% 13% 7%
Difficult to answer/No answer 57% 61% 58% 69% 60% 78% 72% 51% 62% 73% 77%
79. 79
How frequently do you encounter information in the media,
including social media, that you believe is misleading or false?
22%
30%
15%
8%
4%
21%
Daily or almost daily
At least once a week
At least once a month
Less frequently
Never
Difficult to answer/No answer
80. 80
How frequently do you encounter information in the media,
including social media, that you believe is misleading or false?
20%
26%
22%
15%
17%
28%
37%
31%
31%
29%
27%
34%
32%
25%
16%
14%
14%
19%
13%
17%
10%
7%
8%
7%
10%
8%
5%
5%
3%
4%
5%
9%
2%
2%
3%
22%
17%
22%
20%
26%
15%
20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
West
Center
South
East
Daily or almost daily At least once a week At least once a month
Less frequently Never Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by age, region)
RegionAge
81. 81
How frequently do you encounter information in the media, including
social media, that you believe is misleading or false?
20%
26%
22%
15%
17%
28%
37%
31%
31%
29%
27%
34%
32%
25%
16%
14%
14%
19%
13%
17%
10%
7%
8%
7%
10%
8%
5%
5%
3%
4%
5%
9%
2%
2%
3%
22%
17%
22%
20%
26%
15%
20%
18-35
36-50
51+
West
Center
South
East
Daily or almost daily At least once a week At least once a month
Less frequently Never Difficult to answer/No answer
28%
20%
11%
19%
16%
16%
29%
18%
18%
34%
33%
30%
30%
28%
26%
33%
34%
23%
35%
40%
28%
30%
14%
13%
21%
16%
15%
10%
12%
25%
7%
12%
18%
4%
6%
13%
13%
9%
7%
10%
10%
8%
4%
4%
3%
3%
12%
8%
5%
6%
3%
2%
7%
5%
1%
21%
28%
15%
19%
22%
28%
23%
10%
18%
17%
14%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Would not vote
Undecided
BPP Solidarnist
Self-Reliance
Party
Fatherland
(Batkivshchyna)
Radical Party
Servant of the
People
Civic Position
Svoboda
Opposition Bloc
For Life Party (Za
Zhyttia)
(Disaggregated by political party preference)
82. 82
To what extent is misleading or false information in the media a
problem for Ukraine?
30%
37%
13%
5%
15%
Very big problem
Big problem
Small problem
No problem at all
Difficult to answer/No answer
84. Demographics
84
45%
55%
32%
26%
42%
3%
19%
39%
38%
1%
46%
34%
17%
2%
1%
26%
1%
13%
5%
28%
3%
8%
5%
4%
5%
1%
66%
34%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Non-complete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Non-complete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
City
Village
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
SETTLE
MENT
TYPE
85. 85
51%
26%
22%
<1%
0%
91%
6%
2%
1%
36%
19%
8%
1%
1%
0%
0%
4%
25%
2%
3%
96%
1%
1%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENATHOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMEBERSHIP
Demographics
86. 86
15%
34%
35%
10%
2%
<1%
3%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money for buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes,
but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a
good suit, a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing
more expensive things (e.g. appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like
a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Demographics