The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from December 13-27, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents. It found that 32% said they definitely would vote in the 2019 presidential election, while 42% said they somewhat would vote. If the election was held the following Sunday, the top candidates respondents said they would vote for were Yulia Tymoshenko at 16%, Volodymyr Zelenskyi at 11%, and Petro Poroshenko at 9%. The survey also examined potential run-off election matchups between candidates.
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Serzh Sargsyan leads in the polls ahead of Armenia's February 2013 presidential election, receiving around 44% of the vote according to survey results. Raffi Hovhannisyan has established himself as the leading opposition candidate with around 20% support, more than all other candidates combined. While not all parties nominated a candidate, high voter turnout is expected with around 73% saying they will certainly vote. Sargsyan receives the highest ratings for experience and political power, while Hovhannisyan is seen as more caring, credible, and likeable, though voters trust Sargsyan's political program and party affiliation more. The election seems poised for Sargsyan to win in the first round, though
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Sociopolitical life of Zaporizhzhia city: the directions of changes that happened during the year and existing problems. The rating of key players in the sphere of politics.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The results of sociopolitical monitoring "Zaporizhzhia: 4 months after election"MLS group
The support rating of mayor, assessment of his work, significant changes in Zaporizhzhia and its character, and also decommunization, new police and goverment headed by A. Yatsenyuk - all these topics in the first results of sociopolitical research conducted by MLS group!
Predicting State-Level 2016 Vote using MRP and a National Tracking PollLangerResearch
This document summarizes a presentation on using multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) models to predict state-level vote outcomes in the 2016 US presidential election using data from national tracking polls. Key findings include:
1) The MRP model correctly predicted the winner in 49 of 50 states and DC, and had an average error of 3.5 points on Clinton-Trump margins across states.
2) Errors were smaller than state poll averages in most swing states.
3) Comparisons to exit polls found the MRP model predicted an older and less educated electorate than polls.
4) Analyses of national tracking poll data from 2000-2016 found MRP accurately predicted winners in 48 of 51 contests
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Serzh Sargsyan leads in the polls ahead of Armenia's February 2013 presidential election, receiving around 44% of the vote according to survey results. Raffi Hovhannisyan has established himself as the leading opposition candidate with around 20% support, more than all other candidates combined. While not all parties nominated a candidate, high voter turnout is expected with around 73% saying they will certainly vote. Sargsyan receives the highest ratings for experience and political power, while Hovhannisyan is seen as more caring, credible, and likeable, though voters trust Sargsyan's political program and party affiliation more. The election seems poised for Sargsyan to win in the first round, though
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Sociopolitical life of Zaporizhzhia city: the directions of changes that happened during the year and existing problems. The rating of key players in the sphere of politics.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The results of sociopolitical monitoring "Zaporizhzhia: 4 months after election"MLS group
The support rating of mayor, assessment of his work, significant changes in Zaporizhzhia and its character, and also decommunization, new police and goverment headed by A. Yatsenyuk - all these topics in the first results of sociopolitical research conducted by MLS group!
Predicting State-Level 2016 Vote using MRP and a National Tracking PollLangerResearch
This document summarizes a presentation on using multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) models to predict state-level vote outcomes in the 2016 US presidential election using data from national tracking polls. Key findings include:
1) The MRP model correctly predicted the winner in 49 of 50 states and DC, and had an average error of 3.5 points on Clinton-Trump margins across states.
2) Errors were smaller than state poll averages in most swing states.
3) Comparisons to exit polls found the MRP model predicted an older and less educated electorate than polls.
4) Analyses of national tracking poll data from 2000-2016 found MRP accurately predicted winners in 48 of 51 contests
The 2016 Election - How and why it's President TrumpLangerResearch
Presented at AAPOR 2017 by Sofi Sinozich, Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates, and Gregory Holyk, Senior Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates
Negative Vote can improve all democraciesSam Chang 張天鷞
Negative voting, which allows voters to vote against candidates, could improve democracies according to research. It gives voters the basic right to say "no" and may increase voter participation. Negative voting could also reduce extremism by punishing extreme rhetoric and make election results better reflect the views of more people. Research in Taiwan found negative voting decreased undecided voters and increased the percentage of decided voters. It also showed some candidates saw their support drop once negative votes were included.
A 2016 Election Post-Mortem: The ABC News/Washington Post Tracking PollLangerResearch
This document summarizes the findings of a post-mortem analysis of the 2016 ABC News/Washington Post tracking poll conducted after Donald Trump's unexpected election victory. The analysis found the final poll estimate of Hillary Clinton leading by 4 points was accurate based on the poll's historical average error of 2 points. While some state polls underestimated Trump support, the national poll found no evidence of "shy" Trump voters or other issues. Overall, the national popular vote estimate was sound despite missing Trump's electoral college victory.
Socio-political life of Zaporizhzhia: the rating of key players in political ...MLS group
Sociological research "Socio-political monitoring in Zaporіzhzhia: actual problems. Round #1" was held from March 5 to 16, 2018. The poll involved 804 respondents aged 18 years. Data collection was conducted by the "face-to-face" interview method, that is, personally with the respondents at their place of residence. The results obtained are representative of the respondent's residence area, age and sex.
The results of an Indy Politics poll of this year’s upcoming City-County Council races indicates control of the body could be up for grabs. However, candidates have a long way to go to educate voters about who’s even on the ballot in their district.
Grantmakers for Southern Progress - Moving the South Forwards: A Post-Electio...Neighborhood Funders Group
http://www.nfg.org/gsp_postelection_webinar_recap
On December 16, 2016, NFG's Grantmakers for Southern Progress working group, along with the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation and Funders for LGBTQ Issues' Out in the South Initiative, co-hosted a conference call for funders to explore the impact of the 2016 election results in Southern communities.
In line with the IRR’s objective to become an authority on political market research, the Institute has undertaken its second full survey
of the electoral landscape, to supplement the first full survey carried out in September 2018, and a “snap poll” carried out in December
2018.
Mr survey analysis – pre poll for andhra pradesh(1)Ravi Rajiv
The document provides a summary of a survey analysis for the pre-poll situation in Andhra Pradesh. It analyzes demographics, the major political parties and their stances, key issues in the state including the Telangana movement, and the results of a questionnaire. The survey found that support for Telangana is strong, performance of the current government is viewed poorly, and YSR Congress leader Jagan Mohan Reddy has an advantage but support for parties is still divided across regions. An alliance in the next election is considered possible.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
Magellan Strategies Montana US Senate Survey Release April 10, 2014Magellan Strategies
Magellan Strategies survey of 2,490 likely Montana general election voters. The survey includes a voter mood question, US Senate ballot test of Steve Daines, John Walsh, and Roger Roots, and a Congressional generic ballot test.
Nigeria's February 14 elections : Popular opinions and attitudesAfrobarometer
This document summarizes findings from an Afrobarometer survey of Nigerian public opinion ahead of the February 2015 elections. Key findings include:
- Nigerians are generally dissatisfied with the economy and government performance on issues like jobs and corruption.
- Most feel free to vote as they choose but fear of political violence or intimidation has sharply risen. Views of the election commission are mixed.
- Based on December 2014 preferences, the ruling PDP and main opposition APC are in a close contest nationally for the presidency. Support levels vary significantly across Nigeria's regions.
- The election outcome is too close to predict as campaigning was still underway at the time of the survey. Nigerians widely support
This document summarizes the results of the 11th Vanderbilt University Poll conducted between April 23 and May 9, 2015 with 1,001 registered voters in Tennessee. Some key findings include:
- President Obama's approval rating among Tennessee voters was 34% in May 2015.
- Perceptions of the national economy were more positive (67%) than perceptions of the Tennessee economy (48%).
- Governor Bill Haslam had a 61% approval rating, while the Tennessee State Legislature had a 55% approval rating.
- 64% of voters supported expanding health care coverage through the "Insure Tennessee" plan, though support varied significantly by partisanship.
- 78% thought the full state legislature should
This document contains a study conducted by students at Middle College High School at HCC Gulfton on voting trends in Harris County, Texas for the 2014 election. The study found that early voter turnout has decreased since 2010 despite population growth. The students created an early voting information guide with locations, dates, and historical voter data to address the lack of centralized information and encourage more people to vote early. Their research method included collecting daily early voting data and comparing 2014 results to 2010 and 2012, finding that efforts are needed to maintain momentum in voter turnout.
The 2010 Elections for the Greek Regional AuthoritiesIoannis Andreadis
Presented at the 61st Political Studies Association Annual Conference "Transforming Politics: New Synergies", 19 - 21 April 2011, London, UK, Panel: “GPSG Panel 3 – Contemporary Challenges: Greece beyond the Crisis”. Paper available at http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/PSA2011-GPSG.pdf
Democratic primary for Hawaii lieutenant governor toplines and Dem primary fo...Honolulu Civil Beat
A poll of 729 likely Democratic primary voters in Hawaii from June 7-9 showed Tsutsui leading Hee for governor. Tsutsui had support of 45% of voters compared to 33% for Hee, with 22% undecided. Tsutsui performed best with younger voters, Japanese and Filipino respondents, liberals, Democrats, union families, and those earning over $100,000. Hee found more support among older voters, Hispanics, conservatives, independents, and non-union families. The poll also measured support for governor candidates by region, income level, and preference in the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
The 2016 Election - How and why it's President TrumpLangerResearch
Presented at AAPOR 2017 by Sofi Sinozich, Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates, and Gregory Holyk, Senior Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates
Negative Vote can improve all democraciesSam Chang 張天鷞
Negative voting, which allows voters to vote against candidates, could improve democracies according to research. It gives voters the basic right to say "no" and may increase voter participation. Negative voting could also reduce extremism by punishing extreme rhetoric and make election results better reflect the views of more people. Research in Taiwan found negative voting decreased undecided voters and increased the percentage of decided voters. It also showed some candidates saw their support drop once negative votes were included.
A 2016 Election Post-Mortem: The ABC News/Washington Post Tracking PollLangerResearch
This document summarizes the findings of a post-mortem analysis of the 2016 ABC News/Washington Post tracking poll conducted after Donald Trump's unexpected election victory. The analysis found the final poll estimate of Hillary Clinton leading by 4 points was accurate based on the poll's historical average error of 2 points. While some state polls underestimated Trump support, the national poll found no evidence of "shy" Trump voters or other issues. Overall, the national popular vote estimate was sound despite missing Trump's electoral college victory.
Socio-political life of Zaporizhzhia: the rating of key players in political ...MLS group
Sociological research "Socio-political monitoring in Zaporіzhzhia: actual problems. Round #1" was held from March 5 to 16, 2018. The poll involved 804 respondents aged 18 years. Data collection was conducted by the "face-to-face" interview method, that is, personally with the respondents at their place of residence. The results obtained are representative of the respondent's residence area, age and sex.
The results of an Indy Politics poll of this year’s upcoming City-County Council races indicates control of the body could be up for grabs. However, candidates have a long way to go to educate voters about who’s even on the ballot in their district.
Grantmakers for Southern Progress - Moving the South Forwards: A Post-Electio...Neighborhood Funders Group
http://www.nfg.org/gsp_postelection_webinar_recap
On December 16, 2016, NFG's Grantmakers for Southern Progress working group, along with the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation and Funders for LGBTQ Issues' Out in the South Initiative, co-hosted a conference call for funders to explore the impact of the 2016 election results in Southern communities.
In line with the IRR’s objective to become an authority on political market research, the Institute has undertaken its second full survey
of the electoral landscape, to supplement the first full survey carried out in September 2018, and a “snap poll” carried out in December
2018.
Mr survey analysis – pre poll for andhra pradesh(1)Ravi Rajiv
The document provides a summary of a survey analysis for the pre-poll situation in Andhra Pradesh. It analyzes demographics, the major political parties and their stances, key issues in the state including the Telangana movement, and the results of a questionnaire. The survey found that support for Telangana is strong, performance of the current government is viewed poorly, and YSR Congress leader Jagan Mohan Reddy has an advantage but support for parties is still divided across regions. An alliance in the next election is considered possible.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
Magellan Strategies Montana US Senate Survey Release April 10, 2014Magellan Strategies
Magellan Strategies survey of 2,490 likely Montana general election voters. The survey includes a voter mood question, US Senate ballot test of Steve Daines, John Walsh, and Roger Roots, and a Congressional generic ballot test.
Nigeria's February 14 elections : Popular opinions and attitudesAfrobarometer
This document summarizes findings from an Afrobarometer survey of Nigerian public opinion ahead of the February 2015 elections. Key findings include:
- Nigerians are generally dissatisfied with the economy and government performance on issues like jobs and corruption.
- Most feel free to vote as they choose but fear of political violence or intimidation has sharply risen. Views of the election commission are mixed.
- Based on December 2014 preferences, the ruling PDP and main opposition APC are in a close contest nationally for the presidency. Support levels vary significantly across Nigeria's regions.
- The election outcome is too close to predict as campaigning was still underway at the time of the survey. Nigerians widely support
This document summarizes the results of the 11th Vanderbilt University Poll conducted between April 23 and May 9, 2015 with 1,001 registered voters in Tennessee. Some key findings include:
- President Obama's approval rating among Tennessee voters was 34% in May 2015.
- Perceptions of the national economy were more positive (67%) than perceptions of the Tennessee economy (48%).
- Governor Bill Haslam had a 61% approval rating, while the Tennessee State Legislature had a 55% approval rating.
- 64% of voters supported expanding health care coverage through the "Insure Tennessee" plan, though support varied significantly by partisanship.
- 78% thought the full state legislature should
This document contains a study conducted by students at Middle College High School at HCC Gulfton on voting trends in Harris County, Texas for the 2014 election. The study found that early voter turnout has decreased since 2010 despite population growth. The students created an early voting information guide with locations, dates, and historical voter data to address the lack of centralized information and encourage more people to vote early. Their research method included collecting daily early voting data and comparing 2014 results to 2010 and 2012, finding that efforts are needed to maintain momentum in voter turnout.
The 2010 Elections for the Greek Regional AuthoritiesIoannis Andreadis
Presented at the 61st Political Studies Association Annual Conference "Transforming Politics: New Synergies", 19 - 21 April 2011, London, UK, Panel: “GPSG Panel 3 – Contemporary Challenges: Greece beyond the Crisis”. Paper available at http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/PSA2011-GPSG.pdf
Democratic primary for Hawaii lieutenant governor toplines and Dem primary fo...Honolulu Civil Beat
A poll of 729 likely Democratic primary voters in Hawaii from June 7-9 showed Tsutsui leading Hee for governor. Tsutsui had support of 45% of voters compared to 33% for Hee, with 22% undecided. Tsutsui performed best with younger voters, Japanese and Filipino respondents, liberals, Democrats, union families, and those earning over $100,000. Hee found more support among older voters, Hispanics, conservatives, independents, and non-union families. The poll also measured support for governor candidates by region, income level, and preference in the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
The second nationwide TNS opinion poll was carried out between 31 January and 5 February 2013 by its local partner IPSC. The poll was commissioned by European Friends of Armenia (www.EuFoA.org) in order to contribute to a factual debate ahead of the elections. The sample size of the survey is 1,609.
2014 july 25 public opinion survey residents of moldova, june 7-27, 2014Rasa Alisauskiene
The survey was conducted in Moldova from June 7-27, 2014 with 1,200 respondents through face-to-face interviews. It is representative of Moldova's population by age, gender, education, region and settlement size. The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. Growing support for democracy was found, with satisfaction in democracy increasing and more believing the country is heading in the right direction. However, corruption and economic problems remain top concerns.
The survey was conducted September 12–25, 2014 by Rating Group Ukraine and Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organizationon behalf of the International Republican Institute.
Research which clearly shows opinion and attitude differencies between Western+Central and Southern+Eastern Ukraine. There are some questions to
- wording and formulation of questionnaire,
- some methodics of results presentation of this USA-sponsoring research,
but anyway that shows the whole picture
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
The document summarizes political trends from a June 2012 survey in Mongolia. It finds that over 80% of respondents planned to participate in the 2012 parliamentary elections. The ruling Democratic Party polled the highest at around 42%. The document outlines two scenarios for how parliamentary seats may be distributed as a result, with the Democratic Party projected to win between 40-49 seats out of 76 total.
The document summarizes political trends from a June 2012 survey in Mongolia. It finds that over 80% of respondents planned to participate in the 2012 parliamentary elections. The ruling Democratic Party polled the highest at around 42%. The document outlines two scenarios for how parliamentary seats may be distributed as a result, with the Democratic Party projected to win between 40-49 seats out of 76 total.
ОПРОС: КТО ПОБЕДИТ ТРАМПА НА СЛЕДУЮЩИХ ВЫБОРАХmResearcher
Если президент США Дональд Трамп будет баллотироваться на второй президентский срок, он столкнется с серьезной конкуренцией со стороны американских политиков и лидеров общественного мнения
Ukrainians’ interest and expectations of the elections results in the USA Ratinggroup
The document summarizes the results of a survey of 1200 Ukrainians regarding their interest in and expectations from the 2016 US presidential election. Key findings include:
- 55% of Ukrainians followed the election, with higher interest in western regions than eastern regions. Men, older, and more educated Ukrainians followed more closely.
- 39% of Ukrainians sympathized with Hillary Clinton, 10% with Donald Trump, and 42% with neither candidate. Those with higher education favored Clinton more.
- 42% of Ukrainians do not expect changes in Ukraine-US relations after Trump's victory, while 25% expect worsening relations, especially in central and southern regions.
This document summarizes the findings of a study on voter preferences in South Africa prior to the 2019 national elections. Some key findings:
- Support for the ruling ANC party increased to 56% from 53% previously, while support declined for the main opposition parties DA and EFF.
- Receipt of a social grant had a statistically significant impact on voter preferences, making recipients more likely to support the ANC.
- Perceptions of socio-economic well-being surpassed democratic rights as a more important factor influencing voter choices.
- Trust in political institutions like the presidency and social agencies increased under President Ramaphosa, which may impact voter support.
The document summarizes the findings of a survey on Kenyan citizens' perceptions of elections, the IEBC, and electoral reforms. Key findings include:
1) 63.3% of Kenyans are willing to participate in future elections, but 36.7% are unwilling or uncertain, mainly due to mistrust in electoral processes. The youngest and those in North Eastern region expressed most unwillingness.
2) Opinions are divided on IEBC impartiality and 2017 election fairness, but 48.8% agree IEBC needs reconstitution. 50.8% believe IEBC allocated inadequate time for voter registration. 59% support electronic voting systems.
3) Focus group discussions found willingness to vote stems
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (08/12/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
This document summarizes the results of an Ipsos poll conducted for Thomson Reuters between August 10-11, 2020. It provides data on Americans' views on various political issues, including:
- Most think the country is headed in the wrong direction rather than the right direction.
- Healthcare, the economy, and unemployment are seen as the most important problems facing the country.
- Approval of Trump's job performance is around 40% overall but much higher among Republicans and lower among Democrats.
- About half approve of Trump's handling of the economy but fewer approve of his handling of healthcare and COVID-19.
- In a hypothetical election today, Biden leads Trump among all adults and registered
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Similar to Social and political moods of Ukrainians, december 2018 (20)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
The document analyzes violations of electoral rights that occurred during elections in liberated territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in Ukraine. It describes violations during the 2014 extraordinary presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 2015 local elections, including obstacles to voting, violence against election officials, and criminal interference. The document highlights issues preventing internally displaced persons from exercising their right to vote and proposes solutions like allowing voters to change their voting address without changing their official place of residence, to integrate displaced people into their new communities while preserving electoral rights.
The document provides background information on Popasna, Ukraine and summarizes key events regarding its occupation and liberation during the 2014 conflict. It describes how Popasna came under the control of pro-Russian separatist forces in May 2014 but was liberated by Ukrainian troops on July 22, 2014. However, Popasna remained strategically important and faced repeated artillery attacks from separatists using Grads and other rocket launchers throughout the remainder of 2014, resulting in civilian casualties and property damage. The document lists numerous specific dates of artillery attacks on the city during this period.
The town of Mariinka has been at the center of conflict in eastern Ukraine since 2014. It has been repeatedly shelled by Russian-led forces, leading to numerous civilian casualties and widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure. Although a ceasefire was agreed to in Minsk, the shelling of Mariinka has continued on a near daily basis. As a result, many residents have been forced to evacuate while others live in difficult conditions, lacking basic services. Over four years of conflict, 41 residents have been killed according to official data. The constant shelling of civilian areas like Mariinka may constitute war crimes under international law.
Digest by Ukrainian Helsinki Human rights Union, April 2019DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the activities of the USAID Human Rights in Action Program implemented by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union in April 2019. It discusses the program's work on human rights monitoring, advocacy, strategic litigation, free legal aid provision, and human rights education. Key events covered include Russia simplifying citizenship for eastern Ukrainians, and the PACE keeping sanctions on Russia in place.
06-18-2024-Princeton Meetup-Introduction to MilvusTimothy Spann
06-18-2024-Princeton Meetup-Introduction to Milvus
tim.spann@zilliz.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
https://x.com/paasdev
https://github.com/tspannhw
https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus
Get Milvused!
https://milvus.io/
Read my Newsletter every week!
https://github.com/tspannhw/FLiPStackWeekly/blob/main/142-17June2024.md
For more cool Unstructured Data, AI and Vector Database videos check out the Milvus vector database videos here
https://www.youtube.com/@MilvusVectorDatabase/videos
Unstructured Data Meetups -
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/
https://lu.ma/calendar/manage/cal-VNT79trvj0jS8S7
https://www.meetup.com/pro/unstructureddata/
https://zilliz.com/community/unstructured-data-meetup
https://zilliz.com/event
Twitter/X: https://x.com/milvusio https://x.com/paasdev
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zilliz/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
GitHub: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus https://github.com/tspannhw
Invitation to join Discord: https://discord.com/invite/FjCMmaJng6
Blogs: https://milvusio.medium.com/ https://www.opensourcevectordb.cloud/ https://medium.com/@tspann
Expand LLMs' knowledge by incorporating external data sources into LLMs and your AI applications.
06-20-2024-AI Camp Meetup-Unstructured Data and Vector DatabasesTimothy Spann
Tech Talk: Unstructured Data and Vector Databases
Speaker: Tim Spann (Zilliz)
Abstract: In this session, I will discuss the unstructured data and the world of vector databases, we will see how they different from traditional databases. In which cases you need one and in which you probably don’t. I will also go over Similarity Search, where do you get vectors from and an example of a Vector Database Architecture. Wrapping up with an overview of Milvus.
Introduction
Unstructured data, vector databases, traditional databases, similarity search
Vectors
Where, What, How, Why Vectors? We’ll cover a Vector Database Architecture
Introducing Milvus
What drives Milvus' Emergence as the most widely adopted vector database
Hi Unstructured Data Friends!
I hope this video had all the unstructured data processing, AI and Vector Database demo you needed for now. If not, there’s a ton more linked below.
My source code is available here
https://github.com/tspannhw/
Let me know in the comments if you liked what you saw, how I can improve and what should I show next? Thanks, hope to see you soon at a Meetup in Princeton, Philadelphia, New York City or here in the Youtube Matrix.
Get Milvused!
https://milvus.io/
Read my Newsletter every week!
https://github.com/tspannhw/FLiPStackWeekly/blob/main/141-10June2024.md
For more cool Unstructured Data, AI and Vector Database videos check out the Milvus vector database videos here
https://www.youtube.com/@MilvusVectorDatabase/videos
Unstructured Data Meetups -
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/
https://lu.ma/calendar/manage/cal-VNT79trvj0jS8S7
https://www.meetup.com/pro/unstructureddata/
https://zilliz.com/community/unstructured-data-meetup
https://zilliz.com/event
Twitter/X: https://x.com/milvusio https://x.com/paasdev
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zilliz/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
GitHub: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus https://github.com/tspannhw
Invitation to join Discord: https://discord.com/invite/FjCMmaJng6
Blogs: https://milvusio.medium.com/ https://www.opensourcevectordb.cloud/ https://medium.com/@tspann
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/events/301383476/?slug=unstructured-data-meetup-new-york&eventId=301383476
https://www.aicamp.ai/event/eventdetails/W2024062014
Did you know that drowning is a leading cause of unintentional death among young children? According to recent data, children aged 1-4 years are at the highest risk. Let's raise awareness and take steps to prevent these tragic incidents. Supervision, barriers around pools, and learning CPR can make a difference. Stay safe this summer!
PyData London 2024: Mistakes were made (Dr. Rebecca Bilbro)Rebecca Bilbro
To honor ten years of PyData London, join Dr. Rebecca Bilbro as she takes us back in time to reflect on a little over ten years working as a data scientist. One of the many renegade PhDs who joined the fledgling field of data science of the 2010's, Rebecca will share lessons learned the hard way, often from watching data science projects go sideways and learning to fix broken things. Through the lens of these canon events, she'll identify some of the anti-patterns and red flags she's learned to steer around.
2. Methodology
2
• The survey was conducted by Rating Group Ukraine on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in
Survey Research.
• The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine (except for the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas) from December 13-
27, 2018, through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes.
• The sample consisted of 2,400 permanent residents of Ukraine aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. It is representative of
the general population by gender, age, region, and settlement size. The distribution of population by regions and settlements
is based on statistical data of the Central Election Commission from the 2014 parliamentary elections, and the distribution of
population by age and gender is based on data from the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine from January 1, 2018.
• A multi-stage probability sampling method was used with the random route and “last birthday” methods for respondent
selection.
• Stage One: The territory of Ukraine was split into 25 administrative regions (24 regions of Ukraine and Kyiv). The survey
was conducted throughout all regions of Ukraine, with the exception of the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas.
• Stage Two: The selection of settlements was based on towns and villages. Towns were grouped into subtypes according
to their size:
• Cities with populations of more than 1 million
• Cities with populations of between 500,000-999,000
• Cities with populations of between 100,000-499,000
• Cities with populations of between 50,000-99,000
• Cities with populations of up to 50,000
• Villages
Cities and villages were selected by the PPS method (probability proportional to size). The number of selected
cities/villages in each region is proportional to the share of population living in cities/villages of a certain type in each
region.
• Stage Three: Households were selected by the random route method, and respondents were selected by the “last
birthday” rule.
• The margin of error does not exceed 2.0 percent for the full sample.
• The response rate is 62.7 percent.
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
• The survey was financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
• For disaggregations by intended vote, the Top 9 parties and the Top 10 presidential candidates are displayed. The sample of
respondents who would vote for other parties/candidates is too small for analysis.
3. Frequently Cited Disaggregates
3
Region Sample Size (n)
West 625
Center 813
East 375
South 587
Age Sample Size (n)
18-35 714
36-50 652
50+ 1,024
First Choice in
Presidential Elections
Sample Size
(n)
Yuriy Boyko 169
Anatoliy Hrytsenko 164
Oleh Lyashko 136
Yevheniy Muraiev 77
Petro Poroshenko 205
Andriy Sadoviy 50
Yulia Tymoshenko 320
Oleksandr Shevchenko 69
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk 54
Volodymyr Zelenskyi 217
I would not vote 322
Undecided 451
Political Party
Preference
Sample Size
(n)
Batkivshchyna 326
BPP “Solidarnist” 180
Civic Position 146
Nashi 71
Oppositional Platform –
Za Zhyttia
159
Radical Party 141
Self-Reliance
(Samopomich)
62
Sluha Narodu 202
UKROP 66
I would not vote 355
Undecided 469
4. 4
Geographical Key
*Due to the Russian occupation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, residents of Crimea and the so-
called separatist-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts (“the Donbas”) were not surveyed in this poll.
6. Do you intend to vote in the presidential elections scheduled for
March 31, 2019?
6
32%
42%
5%
12%
9%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
7. 7
(Disaggregated by region, age)
26%
30%
37%
26%
30%
32%
38%
43%
44%
40%
41%
40%
43%
44%
7%
5%
4%
6%
6%
5%
4%
13%
13%
10%
17%
14%
10%
7%
10%
8%
9%
10%
10%
10%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
South
East
Center
West
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you intend to vote in the presidential elections scheduled for
March 31, 2019?
9. If presidential elections were held next Sunday and the following
candidates participated in the election, for whom would you vote?
9
19%
13%
4%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
6%
7%
7%
9%
9%
13%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Arseniy Yatseniuk
Valentyn Nalyvaichenko
Ruslan Koshulynskyi
Serhiy Taruta
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleh Lyashko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Yuriy Boyko
Petro Poroshenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
(All respondents)
10. 10
(Among likely voters: n=1,773)
17%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
7%
8%
9%
11%
11%
16%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Arseniy Yatseniuk
Valentyn Nalyvaichenko
Ruslan Koshulynskyi
Serhiy Taruta
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Oleh Lyashko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Yuriy Boyko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Petro Poroshenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
If presidential elections were held next Sunday and the following
candidates participated in the election, for whom would you vote?
11. 11
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Yulia Tymoshenko 11% 13% 16% 13% 16% 13% 8%
Volodymyr Zelenskyi 18% 9% 3% 5% 10% 12% 7%
Petro Poroshenko 7% 10% 9% 12% 9% 5% 7%
Yuriy Boyko 3% 5% 11% 4% 5% 9% 13%
Anatoliy Hrytsenko 3% 6% 10% 9% 7% 4% 6%
Oleh Lyashko 3% 5% 8% 5% 6% 7% 3%
Yevheniy Muraiev 1% 4% 4% - 4% 4% 6%
Oleksandr Shevchenko 4% 3% 2% 6% 2% 2% 2%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1%
Andriy Sadovyi 2% 4% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2%
Serhiy Taruta 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1%
Ruslan Koshulynskyi 1% 1% - 2% - - 1%
Valentyn Nalyvaichenko - 1% 1% 2% - - 1%
Arseniy Yatseniuk 1% - - 1% - - -
Other 4% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 5%
I would not vote 17% 14% 11% 9% 11% 19% 17%
Difficult to answer/No answer 20% 19% 18% 23% 16% 18% 20%
If presidential elections were held next Sunday and the following
candidates participated in the election, for whom would you vote?
(Disaggregated by age, region)
14. If the following two candidates made it to a second round in the
March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would you vote?
14
20%
41%
26%
13%
Difficult to
answer/No
answer
Would not
vote
Yulia
Tymoshenko
Petro
Poroshenko
0% 20% 40% 60%
Poroshenko vs.
Tymoshenko
21%
35%
23%
21%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Yulia Tymoshenko
Anatoliy
Hrytsenko
0% 20% 40%
21%
33%
23%
24%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Volodymyr
Zelenskyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
0% 20% 40%
22%
38%
25%
15%
Difficult to answer/No
answer
Would not vote
Yulia Tymoshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
0% 20% 40%
Hrytsenko vs.
Tymoshenko
Sadovyi vs.
Tymoshenko
Tymoshenko vs.
Zelenskyi
15. If the following two candidates made it to a second round in the
March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would you vote?
15
20%
38%
28%
14%
Difficult to
answer/No
answer
Would not
vote
Yulia
Tymoshenko
Yuriy Boyko
0% 20% 40%
Boyko vs.
Tymoshenko
21%
35%
18%
26%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Sviatoslav
Vakarchuk
Yulia Tymoshenko
0% 20% 40%
24%
38%
11%
27%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Petro Poroshenko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
0% 20% 40%
21%
36%
29%
14%
Difficult to answer/No
answer
Would not vote
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Petro Poroshenko
0% 20% 40%
Tymoshenko vs.
Vakarchuk
Poroshenko vs.
Zelenskyi
Hrytsenko vs.
Poroshenko
16. If the following two candidates made it to a second round in the
March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would you vote?
16
23%
41%
18%
18%
Difficult to
answer/No
answer
Would not
vote
Petro
Poroshenko
Yuriy Boyko
0% 20% 40% 60%
Boyko vs.
Poroshenko
24%
45%
18%
13%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Andriy Sadovyi
Petro Poroshenko
0% 20% 40% 60%
24%
42%
22%
12%
Difficult to
answer/No answer
Would not vote
Sviatoslav
Vakarchuk
Petro Poroshenko
0% 20% 40% 60%
Poroshenko vs.
Sadovyi
Poroshenko vs.
Vakarchuk
17. If Yulia Tymoshenko and Petro Poroshenko made it to a second
round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would
you vote?
17
99%
37%
28%
24%
22%
19%
19%
13%
13%
16%
5%
16%
15%
3%
2%
2%
10%
9%
98%
6%
39%
31%
41%
54%
59%
67%
49%
41%
29%
1%
20%
25%
19%
21%
20%
12%
28%
37%
2%
49%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Andriy Sadovyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Petro Poroshenko
Undecided22%
25%
30%
16%
26%
29%
29%
26%
11%
14%
13%
10%
20%
8%
12%
13%
45%
42%
37%
50%
30%
45%
42%
41%
22%
18%
19%
24%
23%
18%
17%
20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
East
West
South
Center
Nationwide
Yulia Tymoshenko Petro Poroshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
18. If Anatoliy Hrytsenko and Yulia Tymoshenko made it to a second
round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would
you vote?
18
99%
40%
35%
30%
26%
25%
17%
12%
12%
14%
11%
18%
13%
27%
9%
14%
14%
21%
98%
12%
30%
25%
26%
30%
39%
49%
58%
41%
20%
<1%
20%
22%
31%
17%
27%
20%
16%
26%
2%
53%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Petro Poroshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleh Lyashko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
Undecided13%
22%
26%
14%
15%
22%
31%
21%
21%
23%
24%
27%
14%
24%
23%
23%
42%
34%
30%
42%
45%
34%
22%
35%
24%
21%
20%
17%
26%
20%
24%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
South
East
Center
West
Nationwide
Anatoliy Hrytsenko Yulia Tymoshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
19. 97%
32%
24%
21%
15%
15%
13%
13%
11%
12%
<1%
21%
25%
27%
15%
22%
19%
21%
53%
97%
16%
30%
25%
30%
54%
41%
47%
34%
20%
20%
2%
17%
27%
21%
16%
22%
22%
32%
17%
3%
53%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Andriy Sadovyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Petro Poroshenko
Yuriy Boyko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Undecided
19
17%
23%
28%
14%
25%
25%
26%
24%
34%
23%
15%
15%
26%
22%
25%
23%
30%
34%
35%
47%
24%
38%
30%
33%
19%
20%
22%
25%
26%
14%
19%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
East
West
South
Center
Nationwide
Yulia Tymoshenko Volodymyr Zelenskyi Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Yulia Tymoshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi made it to a
second round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom
would you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
20. 97%
40%
11%
11%
9%
8%
7%
6%
4%
1%
10%
10%
34%
22%
32%
14%
23%
33%
29%
97%
15%
36%
38%
47%
41%
45%
51%
39%
40%
25%
3%
14%
17%
20%
18%
33%
19%
22%
28%
2%
50%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleh Lyashko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Petro Poroshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Yulia Tymoshenko
Undecided
20
9%
14%
19%
8%
12%
18%
26%
14%
24%
27%
31%
37%
29%
26%
12%
28%
45%
40%
31%
33%
39%
41%
39%
38%
22%
20%
19%
23%
20%
15%
23%
20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
West
Center
South
East
Nationwide
Yuriy Boyko Yulia Tymoshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Yuriy Boyko and Yulia Tymoshenko made it to a second round in
the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
21. 98%
33%
19%
18%
16%
14%
14%
14%
13%
15%
17%
13%
31%
5%
18%
10%
39%
25%
100%
10%
31%
44%
32%
66%
38%
52%
32%
33%
23%
2%
19%
24%
19%
13%
29%
23%
16%
30%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yuriy Boyko
Petro Poroshenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Andriy Sadovyi
Undecided
21
22%
24%
28%
16%
24%
28%
28%
25%
13%
20%
14%
7%
27%
15%
9%
15%
41%
38%
36%
50%
24%
37%
46%
38%
24%
18%
22%
27%
25%
20%
17%
22%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
East
West
Center
South
Nationwide
Yulia Tymoshenko Andriy Sadovyi Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Yulia Tymoshenko and Andriy Sadovyi made it to a second
round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would
you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
22. 92%
39%
38%
36%
32%
18%
13%
10%
10%
1%
12%
17%
20%
16%
19%
14%
34%
16%
17%
98%
14%
29%
19%
30%
29%
42%
30%
61%
52%
21%
8%
16%
23%
17%
19%
25%
23%
13%
22%
1%
54%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Andriy Sadovyi
Petro Poroshenko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Oleh Lyashko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Yuriy Boyko
Yulia Tymoshenko
Undecided
22
14%
19%
23%
8%
12%
19%
29%
18%
30%
24%
21%
16%
29%
28%
25%
26%
34%
37%
35%
49%
44%
33%
22%
35%
22%
19%
21%
26%
15%
20%
23%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Nationwide
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk Yulia Tymoshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Sviatoslav Vakarchuk and Yulia Tymoshenko made it to a
second round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom
would you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
23. 99%
45%
42%
39%
35%
25%
24%
22%
20%
4%
20%
6%
5%
9%
2%
9%
2%
4%
2%
93%
4%
25%
30%
27%
39%
35%
51%
49%
67%
20%
1%
24%
23%
24%
23%
31%
23%
25%
10%
3%
56%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleh Lyashko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yuriy Boyko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yevheniy Muraiev
Petro Poroshenko
Undecided
23
20%
27%
32%
18%
22%
29%
35%
27%
11%
14%
11%
9%
7%
12%
17%
11%
44%
37%
34%
46%
51%
36%
23%
38%
26%
22%
23%
27%
19%
24%
25%
24%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
East
South
Center
West
Nationwide
Anatoliy Hrytsenko Petro Poroshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Anatoliy Hrytsenko and Petro Poroshenko made it to a second
round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would
you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
24. 96%
14%
12%
11%
7%
7%
5%
4%
4%
8%
2%
30%
44%
51%
25%
40%
33%
21%
22%
97%
19%
35%
23%
20%
32%
33%
39%
54%
60%
22%
2%
21%
21%
18%
36%
21%
23%
21%
14%
3%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Petro Poroshenko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Undecided
24
11%
16%
14%
10%
11%
12%
21%
14%
39%
29%
21%
28%
17%
33%
31%
29%
30%
36%
40%
46%
47%
34%
22%
36%
20%
19%
24%
16%
25%
21%
25%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
South
East
Center
West
Nationwide
Petro Poroshenko Volodymyr Zelenskyi Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Petro Poroshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi made it to a
second round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom
would you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
25. 95%
44%
22%
20%
14%
12%
10%
9%
5%
12%
2%
12%
5%
13%
31%
23%
11%
25%
98%
11%
39%
48%
56%
45%
35%
49%
42%
42%
25%
5%
16%
19%
19%
28%
22%
17%
37%
28%
2%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Oleh Lyashko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Petro Poroshenko
Undecided
25
13%
17%
22%
9%
14%
25%
29%
18%
16%
21%
17%
33%
16%
10%
10%
18%
46%
43%
37%
32%
47%
47%
37%
41%
25%
20%
23%
27%
23%
18%
23%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
West
Center
South
East
Nationwide
Yuriy Boyko Petro Poroshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Yuriy Boyko and Petro Poroshenko made it to a second round
in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would you
vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
26. 97%
7%
5%
5%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
8%
34%
27%
27%
29%
35%
12%
20%
13%
100%
12%
40%
39%
42%
44%
33%
62%
55%
71%
29%
3%
19%
28%
26%
23%
28%
23%
22%
13%
52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Petro Poroshenko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Yuriy Boyko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yevheniy Muraiev
Andriy Sadovyi
Undecided
26
11%
15%
12%
8%
10%
12%
20%
13%
17%
21%
18%
16%
7%
18%
28%
18%
46%
44%
45%
56%
57%
47%
26%
45%
26%
20%
25%
21%
27%
23%
26%
24%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
South
East
Center
West
Nationwide
Petro Poroshenko Andriy Sadovyi Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Petro Poroshenko and Andriy Sadovyi made it to a second
round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom would
you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
27. 91%
52%
44%
32%
32%
26%
25%
14%
13%
1%
13%
4%
2%
10%
5%
4%
7%
2%
4%
95%
8%
21%
39%
36%
39%
43%
37%
61%
66%
26%
9%
23%
15%
21%
24%
28%
31%
23%
17%
4%
53%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Andriy Sadovyi
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Lyashko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Yuriy Boyko
Yevheniy Muraiev
Petro Poroshenko
Undecided
27
17%
22%
28%
8%
17%
23%
33%
22%
13%
15%
10%
10%
8%
12%
19%
12%
44%
42%
40%
54%
53%
43%
23%
42%
26%
22%
23%
28%
22%
22%
26%
24%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Nationwide
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk Petro Poroshenko Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
If Sviatoslav Vakarchuk and Petro Poroshenko made it to a
second round in the March 2019 presidential elections, for whom
would you vote?
(Disaggregated by first round choice)
29. 29
4%
1%
3%
7%
10%
15%
19%
17%
13%
11%
3%
1%
5%
7%
5%
13%
14%
20%
21%
11%
3%
1%
2%
4%
6%
7%
10%
11%
16%
39%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Russian presence in Crimea
Foreign policy
Government incompetence
Social benefits
Communal housing payments, utilities, tariffs, etc.
Economy
Corruption
Military conflict in the Donbas
First choice Second choice Third choice
When making your decision on whom to vote for in the upcoming
presidential elections, currently scheduled for March 31, 2019,
which issues influence your vote the most?
30. 30
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Military conflict in the Donbas 39% 41% 38% 40% 44% 37% 33%
Corruption 16% 17% 16% 21% 18% 14% 9%
Economy 12% 12% 11% 12% 11% 10% 12%
Communal housing payments, utilities, tariffs, etc. 9% 8% 12% 8% 9% 13% 13%
Social benefits 6% 4% 10% 6% 5% 10% 9%
Government incompetence 5% 7% 5% 4% 6% 5% 8%
Foreign policy 5% 4% 4% 1% 3% 8% 7%
Russian presence in Crimea 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2%
Other 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1%
Difficult to answer/No answer 3% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1% 7%
When making your decision on whom to vote for in the upcoming
presidential elections, currently scheduled for March 31, 2019,
which issues influence your vote the most?
(First choice; disaggregated by age, region)
31. 31
When making your decision on whom to vote for in the upcoming
presidential elections, currently scheduled for March 2019, which
issue influences your vote the most?
YuriyBoyko
SviatoslavVakarchuk
AnatoliyHrytsenko
VolodymyrZelenskyi
OlehLyashko
YevheniyMuraiev
PetroPoroshenko
AndriySadovyi
YuliaTymoshenko
OleksandrShevchenko
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
Military conflict in the Donbas 36% 35% 53% 35% 37% 37% 55% 42% 40% 25% 31% 41%
Corruption 16% 30% 13% 19% 18% 12% 8% 23% 19% 20% 14% 16%
Economy 13% 11% 9% 12% 11% 12% 13% 12% 12% 16% 9% 12%
Communal housing payments, utilities, tariffs, etc. 14% 7% 7% 8% 9% 13% 6% 2% 12% 13% 10% 13%
Social benefits 8% 7% 7% 6% 12% 11% 3% 10% 9% 2% 8% 5%
Government incompetence 5% 4% 5% 8% 6% 6% 3% 6% 3% 10% 9% 3%
Foreign policy 5% 2% 3% 6% 4% 6% 10% 4% 2% 4% 3% 4%
Russian presence in Crimea 2% 4% 3% 4% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 5% 1% 2%
Other - - - 1% 1% - - - 1% 2% 1% 1%
Difficult to answer/No answer 1% - 1% 3% 1% - - - - 4% 12% 5%
(First choice; disaggregated by first choice in presidential election)
32. 32
Improving the
economy
Improving social
protection for
the poor
Defending
Ukraine’s
territorial
integrity
Combatting
corruption
within state
bodies
Yulia Tymoshenko 17% 15% 11% 12%
Yuriy Boyko 9% 8% 6% 6%
Volodymyr Zelenskyi 6% 8% 6% 8%
Petro Poroshenko 8% 6% 10% 5%
Anatoliy Hrytsenko 5% 6% 11% 6%
Oleh Lyashko 5% 7% 5% 5%
Andriy Sadovyi 2% 2% 2% 2%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk 2% 3% 2% 3%
Other 7% 6% 7% 7%
None of them 25% 26% 26% 32%
Difficult to answer/No answer 13% 13% 14% 15%
Which presidential candidate do you think is the best on the
following issues?
33. 33
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Yulia Tymoshenko 15% 17% 19% 18% 20% 18% 11%
Yuriy Boyko 5% 7% 13% 4% 8% 11% 17%
Petro Poroshenko 8% 8% 9% 13% 9% 4% 7%
Volodymyr Zelenskyi 12% 6% 2% 4% 8% 7% 4%
Anatoliy Hrytsenko 3% 5% 7% 8% 6% 3% 4%
Oleh Lyashko 4% 4% 7% 5% 6% 5% 3%
Andriy Sadovyi 2% 4% 2% 4% 2% 1% 2%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1%
Other 6% 8% 8% 5% 9% 4% 12%
None of them 27% 28% 21% 20% 21% 34% 26%
Difficult to answer/No answer 15% 13% 12% 15% 11% 13% 15%
Which presidential candidate do you think is the best on
improving the economy?
(Disaggregated by age, region)
42. 42
4%
20%
38%
22%
16%
Completely free and fair
Somewhat free and fair
Somewhat not free and fair
Not free and fair at all
Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you believe that the upcoming presidential elections, currently
scheduled for March 31, 2019, will be free and fair?
44. 44
5%
20%
31%
20%
24% The possibility of street violence is
very high
The possibility of street violence is
somewhat high
The possibility of street violence is
somewhat low
The possibility of street violence is
very low
Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you anticipate street violence in the run-up to the
March 31, 2019 presidential elections?
46. 46
6%
24%
26%
18%
26%
The possibility of street violence is
very high
The possibility of street violence is
somewhat high
The possibility of street violence is
somewhat low
The possibility of street violence is
very low
Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you anticipate street violence in the aftermath of the
March 31, 2019 presidential elections?
48. 9%
2%
3%
13%
6%
18%
27%
22%
30%
39%
37%
24%
49%
30%
16%
21%
6%
12%
18%
20%
Completely free and fair
(n=86)
Somewhat free and fair
(n=473)
Somewhat not free and
fair (n=915)
Not free and fair at all
(n=537)
The possibility of street violence is very high The possibility of street violence is somewhat high
The possibility of street violence is somewhat low The possibility of street violence is very low
Difficult to answer/No answer
48
… in the run-up to the March 2019
presidential elections?
6%
2%
5%
14%
7%
21%
31%
27%
30%
34%
32%
21%
48%
28%
13%
16%
9%
15%
19%
21%
Completely free and fair
(n=86)
Somewhat free and fair
(n=473)
Somewhat not free and
fair (n=915)
Not free and fair at all
(n=537)
Do you anticipate street violence…
…in the aftermath of the March 2019
presidential elections?
(Disaggregated by belief that the presidential elections will be free and fair)
50. Do you intend to vote in the parliamentary elections scheduled for
October 2019?
50
28%
40%
4%
13%
15%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
51. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, for which
political party would you vote?
51
20%
15%
4%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
3%
3%
3%
6%
6%
7%
8%
8%
14%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Vidrodzhennia
Narodnyi Front
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Justice
Svoboda
OSNOVA
Opposition Bloc
Samopomich
UKROP
Nashy
Radical Party
Civic Position
Opposition Platform Za Zhyttia
BPP Solidarnist
Sluha Narodu
Batkivshchyna
(All respondents)
*In this survey, IRI replaced “Za Zhyttia” with the new political association, “Opposition Platform - Za Zhyttia” with Boyko
mentioned among the leaders. The leaders of Opposition Bloc were listed as Novinskiy and Vilkul.
52. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, for which
political party would you vote?
52
(Among likely voters: n=1,631)
18%
4%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
3%
3%
4%
7%
8%
8%
10%
11%
17%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Vidrodzhennia
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Narodnyi Front
Justice
Opposition Bloc
Svoboda
OSNOVA
Nashy
Samopomich
UKROP
Radical Party
Civic Position
Opposition Platform Za Zhyttia
BPP Solidarnist
Sluha Narodu
Batkivshchyna
*In this survey, IRI replaced “Za Zhyttia” with the new political association, “Opposition Platform - Za Zhyttia” with Boyko
mentioned among the leaders. The leaders of Opposition Bloc were listed as Novinskiy and Vilkul.
54. 54
9%
14%
27%
37%
13%
Completely support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Completely oppose
Difficult to answer/No answer
To what extent do you support or oppose the government’s
decision to introduce a thirty-day period of martial law in
Ukraine, beginning effective November 28, 2018?
56. 56
16%
42%
17%
9%
16%
It’s a decision that serves the interests of
Ukraine
It’s a political decision aimed at giving
some politicians an advantage
Both equally
Neither
Difficult to answer/No answer
In your opinion, did the introduction of martial law in Ukraine on
November 28, 2018 serve the interests of Ukraine or did it
represent a political decision aimed at giving some politicians an
advantage?
58. 58
3%
57%
59%
11%
15%
23%
12%
3%
12%
6%
Don't support the introduction of
martial law (n=1,548)
Support the introduction of martial
law (n=540)
It’s a decision that serves the interests of Ukraine
It’s a political decision aimed at giving some politicians an advantage
Both equally
Neither
Difficult to answer/No answer
In your opinion, did the introduction of martial law in Ukraine on
November 28, 2018 serve the interests of Ukraine or did it
represent a political decision aimed at giving some politicians an
advantage?
59. 59
To what extent did the introduction of martial law in Ukraine have
any direct, negative impact on your day-to-day (“everyday”) life?
62%
20%
6%
12%
It has not negatively affected my
everyday life at all
It has somewhat affected my
everyday life in a negative manner
It has greatly affected my everyday
life in a negative manner
Difficult to answer/No answer
60. 60
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
6%
6%
6%
63%
66%
65%
51%
14%
12%
13%
18%
14%
10%
10%
18%
5%
5%
4%
3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Volodymyr Hroisman
Oleh Lyashko
Yuliya Tymoshenko
Petro Poroshenko
Improved a lot Improved somewhat Hasn’t changed
Worsened somewhat Worsened a lot Difficult to answer/No answer
To what extent has your attitude towards the following politicians
changed after the introduction of martial law in Ukraine?
62. Generally speaking, do you think that things in Ukraine are going
in the right direction or wrong direction?
62
13% 14%
15%
18%
34%
29%
15%
17%
15%
11%
13%
11%
13%
18%
16%
14%
15% 15% 16% 16%
71%
66%
69%
64%
48%
51%
72%
68%
70%
76%
71% 72% 72%
68% 67%
71% 71% 70% 71%
70%
16%
20%
16%
17% 18%
20%
13%
15% 15%
13% 15% 17%
15%
15%
17%
15%
14% 15% 14% 14%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Right direction Wrong direction Difficult to answer/No answer
63. Generally speaking, do you think that things in Ukraine are going in
the right direction or wrong direction?
63
70%
27%
20%
19%
12%
10%
5%
4%
3%
5%
12%
21%
50%
69%
63%
77%
73%
82%
90%
92%
84%
67%
9%
23%
12%
18%
11%
17%
13%
5%
6%
11%
21%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
BPP Solidarnist
Samopomich
Civic Position
UKROP
Batkivshchyna
Sluha Narodu
Radical Party
Opposition Platform
Nashy
Would not vote
Undecided
Right direction Wrong direction Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by political party preference)
72. Which three of the following issues are the most important for
Ukraine?
72
49%
45%
25%
24%
23%
20%
17%
17%
15%
13%
10%
10%
7%
5%
4%
4%
2%
2%
2%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Military conflict in Donbas
Corruption within the state bodies
Low industry production
Growth of prices
Government incompetence
Political instability
Unemployment
Social protection for the poor
Relations with Russia
Hryvnia devaluation
Healthcare
Russian presence in the Crimea
Crime
Delay in salary/pension payments
Rights to land ownership
Lack/possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Environment
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
73. Which three of the following issues are the most important for you
personally?
73
62%
28%
26%
26%
23%
20%
17%
14%
11%
11%
9%
9%
8%
7%
5%
5%
2%
2%
5%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Growth of prices
Healthcare
Social protection for the poor
Unemployment
Hryvnia devaluation
Military conflict in Donbas
Corruption within the state bodies
Low industry production
Government incompetence
Delay in salary/pension payments
Political instability
Crime
Lack/possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Rights to land ownership
Relations with Russia
Environment
Russian presence in the Crimea
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
76. 40%41%
38%
46%48%
44%
51%49%50%
47%45%
49%
54%
50%
47%47%49% 47%
10% 8%
16%
22%
11% 9%
12%
9% 8% 7%
13%
8% 7% 6% 6%
10% 8%
13%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Warm Cold
24%26%26%
37%
41%40%40%39%40%41%
38%
42%
47%45%
40%40%38%36%
18%16%
22%24%
16%
13%
18%16%15%15%
19%
13%
9% 8%
10% 15%15%
20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
52%50%51%
31%
15%17%17%16%18%16%18%18%19%18%18%
22%19%
15%
12%
15%
19%
45%
66%
51%
61%59%58%58%56%56%
51%49%48%48%
52%54%
0%
20%
40%
60%
European Union United States
Russia
76
How do you evaluate your attitude toward each of the following
countries?
77. 77
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
36%
37%
32%
40%
42%
41%
52%
53%
59%
55%
57%
57%
55%
54%
51%
53%
54%
52%
50%
52%
52%
54%
53%
43%
41%
42%
37%
37%
36%
27%
24%
17%
14%
17%
15%
15%
15%
19%
18%
18%
14%
16%
18%
15%
14%
13%
4%
5%
6%
5%
5%
9%
6%
10%
9%
12%
12%
12%
14%
12%
14%
14%
8%
9%
10%
15%
17%
16%
14%
17%
17%
20%
18%
17%
14%
14%
13%
15%
20%
14%
16%
15%
19%
17%
15%
20%
24%
24%
14%
16%
16%
20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2012
May 2012
September 2012
May 2013
September 2013
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
September 2018
December 2018
European Union Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan Other Difficult to answer/No answer
78. 78
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
84%
77%
74%
67%
60%
57%
50%
26%
13%
52%
36%
3%
8%
6%
6%
13%
13%
8%
40%
35%
8%
12%
4%
5%
6%
11%
7%
12%
15%
21%
36%
12%
26%
9%
11%
14%
16%
20%
18%
26%
13%
16%
28%
26%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
BPP Solidarnist
UKROP
Samopomich
Civic Position
Batkivshchyna
Sluha Narodu
Radical Party
Opposition Platform
Nashy
Undecided
Would not vote
European Union Customs Union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan Other Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by political party preference)
79. If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
79
34%
38%
43%
41%
48%
48%
45%
39%
43%
46%
40%
34%
37%
43%
43%
45%
44%
43%
40%
31%
30%
28%
30%
30%
32%
29%
27%
27%
26%
26%
33%
33%
31%
30%
9%
7%
17%
14%
8%
10%
10%
12%
11%
12%
12%
15%
12%
7%
8%
8%
10%
13%
15%
8%
15%
17%
13%
16%
17%
17%
14%
22%
24%
26%
17%
16%
15%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
September 2018
December 2018
Would vote for Ukraine to join NATO Would vote against Ukraine joining NATO
Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
80. If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
80
81%
74%
68%
63%
50%
44%
37%
16%
11%
39%
29%
7%
15%
13%
21%
25%
21%
33%
66%
66%
27%
34%
5%
1%
6%
3%
5%
14%
10%
7%
13%
11%
24%
7%
9%
12%
14%
20%
22%
20%
10%
10%
23%
13%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
BPP Solidarnist
UKROP
Samopomich
Civic Position
Batkivshchyna
Radical Party
Sluha Narodu
Opposition Platform
Nashy
Undecided
Would not vote
Would vote for Ukraine to join NATO Would vote against Ukraine joining NATO
Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by political party preference)
82. Demographics
45%
55%
30%
27%
43%
2%
18%
40%
38%
<1%
44%
35%
16%
1%
4%
24%
2%
13%
6%
27%
4%
7%
5%
5%
5%
1%
67%
33%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Male
Female
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, non-governmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
City
Village
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
SETTLE-
MENT
TYPE
82
83. Demographics
47%
31%
22%
89%
8%
3%
1%
37%
19%
9%
1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
4%
22%
2%
6%
97%
1%
1%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENAT
HOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGO
MEMBERSHIP
83
84. Demographics
84
13%
32%
37%
11%
3%
<1%
3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money for buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and
shoes, but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases
like a good suit, a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing
more expensive things (e.g. appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases
like a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS