- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
Звіт Міжнародного республіканського інституту США щодо ситуації в УкраїніmResearcher
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from November 15 to December 14, 2017. It provides details on:
- The national sample of 2,400 residents surveyed throughout Ukraine, excluding occupied territories.
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 residents each in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The multi-stage probability sampling method used to select respondents randomly from cities and villages proportionally.
- Response rates ranged from 58% to 76.2% and margins of error were below 2.8% for city samples and 1.7% for the national sample.
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
The USAID-funded survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of IRI, and the fieldwork was carried out by Rating Group Ukraine.
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Звіт Міжнародного республіканського інституту США щодо ситуації в УкраїніmResearcher
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from November 15 to December 14, 2017. It provides details on:
- The national sample of 2,400 residents surveyed throughout Ukraine, excluding occupied territories.
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 residents each in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The multi-stage probability sampling method used to select respondents randomly from cities and villages proportionally.
- Response rates ranged from 58% to 76.2% and margins of error were below 2.8% for city samples and 1.7% for the national sample.
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
The USAID-funded survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of IRI, and the fieldwork was carried out by Rating Group Ukraine.
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
2014 april 24 survey of residents of ukraine, april 3 12, 2014dumosius
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 3-12, 2014. It finds strong opposition to Russian military intervention across Ukraine, with over 90% opposing in western regions and over 50% opposing in eastern regions. It also finds support for Ukraine remaining a unitary country and high levels of intention to vote in the upcoming May presidential election, with Petro Poroshenko as the frontrunner. Confidence in the interim government remains moderate.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The survey was conducted September 12–25, 2014 by Rating Group Ukraine and Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organizationon behalf of the International Republican Institute.
Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal SurveyRatinggroup
This document summarizes the results of municipal surveys conducted in Ukraine in 2015, 2016, and 2017. It provides ratings and indexes of satisfaction for various public goods and services, opportunities, safety, and pride across different cities in Ukraine. It also includes data on satisfaction with municipal authorities. Overall, it analyzes ratings and perceptions of life in cities across several domains to understand trends over the survey periods.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
Sociopolitical life of Zaporizhzhia city: the directions of changes that happened during the year and existing problems. The rating of key players in the sphere of politics.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
Media consumption and political preferences in 8 oblasts of East and South of...DonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 8 oblasts in eastern and southern Ukraine regarding media consumption and political preferences. Over 15,000 face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2015 and March 2017 to understand media usage patterns and political views. The survey found that television remains the most widely consumed media, with over 90% of respondents reporting daily use. Internet and social media usage is also common, with over half of respondents reporting at least one social media account.
This document contains a study conducted by students at Middle College High School at HCC Gulfton on voting trends in Harris County, Texas for the 2014 election. The study found that early voter turnout has decreased since 2010 despite population growth. The students created an early voting information guide with locations, dates, and historical voter data to address the lack of centralized information and encourage more people to vote early. Their research method included collecting daily early voting data and comparing 2014 results to 2010 and 2012, finding that efforts are needed to maintain momentum in voter turnout.
The document provides a summary of a November 2018 survey of people crossing checkpoints between government and non-government controlled areas in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- The majority (90%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas. Most common reasons for crossing differed depending on area of residence.
- The number of respondents over age 60 increased by 9% to 63% of total, likely due to pension requirements. Reconstruction continued to cause some delays at certain checkpoints.
- Weather deterioration increased safety risks at two checkpoints due to poor infrastructure conditions. Concerns about shelling remained highest at one checkpoint.
Socio-political life of Zaporizhzhia: the rating of key players in political ...MLS group
Sociological research "Socio-political monitoring in Zaporіzhzhia: actual problems. Round #1" was held from March 5 to 16, 2018. The poll involved 804 respondents aged 18 years. Data collection was conducted by the "face-to-face" interview method, that is, personally with the respondents at their place of residence. The results obtained are representative of the respondent's residence area, age and sex.
Populism and global engagement europe, north america and emerging economies d...Pew Research Center
This document summarizes the findings of a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 10 EU nations, the US, China, and India from April to May 2016 with over 18,000 respondents. Some key findings include:
- Populist party supporters in Western countries are more likely to believe their nation's role and influence in the world has declined compared to 10 years ago, and that their economy is currently bad.
- Europeans are more negative than Americans about the impact of increasing diversity on their countries. Europeans also express more concern than Americans about refugees being a threat to security.
- Trust in government and other institutions has declined significantly in many Western countries in recent decades. Many Europeans want to return some powers
The document provides data and information for an afterschool agency to use in deciding where to expand their programs. They currently serve over 1,100 students ages 5-13 across 3 sites in Queens Community Board 1. The data includes demographics of current participants, school data and testing scores for three local school districts, census data on population changes of children in the areas, and guidance questions to structure their decision making process. They will use the "Ask, Assess, Decide" framework and data to determine the best location for their expansion.
Various aspects of Ukrainian society such as: Level of well-being, Tolerance, Trust, Linguistic-ethnic groups, The attitude of Ukrainians to Russia and Russians to Ukraine, Independence of Ukraine, Attitude to the EU NATO the Customs Union, Euromaidan, Propaganda, Situation in the Donbas, Migration, Volunteering
Post-Brexit, Europeans More Positive About the EU, But Want Own Referendum on...Pew Research Center
Bruce Stokes, director of global economic attitudes, presented Pew Research Center findings on European attitudes toward the European Union (EU) in Brussels, Paris, Warsaw, Berlin and London.
1) Georgia has faced a difficult geopolitical position since independence from the Soviet Union, wanting to align with the West but facing complications from Russia and internal conflicts.
2) Early nationalist policies under Zviad Gamsakhurdia exacerbated ethnic tensions that led to conflicts in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Eduard Shevardnadze then took power amid civil unrest.
3) Current relations with Russia remain icy due to the 2008 conflict and Russia's support of breakaway regions. Georgia also seeks closer ties with the EU and NATO but these aspirations are threatened by territorial disputes.
Women are still more undecided than men on how to vote in the EU referendum and less certain that they will vote. Only 56% of women feel informed enough to make a decision on how to vote. While women are more interested in the EU debate than men, only 26% say the campaigns have helped them decide how to vote. 37% of women think both sides of the debate have been too dominated by men.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
The survey was conducted September 12–25, 2014 by Rating Group Ukraine and Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organizationon behalf of the International Republican Institute.
Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal SurveyRatinggroup
This document summarizes the results of municipal surveys conducted in Ukraine in 2015, 2016, and 2017. It provides ratings and indexes of satisfaction for various public goods and services, opportunities, safety, and pride across different cities in Ukraine. It also includes data on satisfaction with municipal authorities. Overall, it analyzes ratings and perceptions of life in cities across several domains to understand trends over the survey periods.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
Sociopolitical life of Zaporizhzhia city: the directions of changes that happened during the year and existing problems. The rating of key players in the sphere of politics.
1) The document analyzes survey data on Ukrainian citizens' preferences regarding integration with the EU or Russia. Support for the EU increased under President Poroshenko while support for Russia declined under Yanukovych and increased under Yuschenko.
2) The data shows significantly higher support for EU integration in western and central Ukraine compared to eastern Ukraine, where support is divided between the EU and Russia. However, this difference is likely temporary and influenced by Russian media propaganda and the security situation in eastern Ukraine.
3) When comparing the benefits of cooperation with the EU and Russia, respondents preferred the EU in most areas like law, technology, investment and security, while seeing energy, trade and culture as equally beneficial with both.
Media consumption and political preferences in 8 oblasts of East and South of...DonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 8 oblasts in eastern and southern Ukraine regarding media consumption and political preferences. Over 15,000 face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2015 and March 2017 to understand media usage patterns and political views. The survey found that television remains the most widely consumed media, with over 90% of respondents reporting daily use. Internet and social media usage is also common, with over half of respondents reporting at least one social media account.
This document contains a study conducted by students at Middle College High School at HCC Gulfton on voting trends in Harris County, Texas for the 2014 election. The study found that early voter turnout has decreased since 2010 despite population growth. The students created an early voting information guide with locations, dates, and historical voter data to address the lack of centralized information and encourage more people to vote early. Their research method included collecting daily early voting data and comparing 2014 results to 2010 and 2012, finding that efforts are needed to maintain momentum in voter turnout.
The document provides a summary of a November 2018 survey of people crossing checkpoints between government and non-government controlled areas in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- The majority (90%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas. Most common reasons for crossing differed depending on area of residence.
- The number of respondents over age 60 increased by 9% to 63% of total, likely due to pension requirements. Reconstruction continued to cause some delays at certain checkpoints.
- Weather deterioration increased safety risks at two checkpoints due to poor infrastructure conditions. Concerns about shelling remained highest at one checkpoint.
Socio-political life of Zaporizhzhia: the rating of key players in political ...MLS group
Sociological research "Socio-political monitoring in Zaporіzhzhia: actual problems. Round #1" was held from March 5 to 16, 2018. The poll involved 804 respondents aged 18 years. Data collection was conducted by the "face-to-face" interview method, that is, personally with the respondents at their place of residence. The results obtained are representative of the respondent's residence area, age and sex.
Populism and global engagement europe, north america and emerging economies d...Pew Research Center
This document summarizes the findings of a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 10 EU nations, the US, China, and India from April to May 2016 with over 18,000 respondents. Some key findings include:
- Populist party supporters in Western countries are more likely to believe their nation's role and influence in the world has declined compared to 10 years ago, and that their economy is currently bad.
- Europeans are more negative than Americans about the impact of increasing diversity on their countries. Europeans also express more concern than Americans about refugees being a threat to security.
- Trust in government and other institutions has declined significantly in many Western countries in recent decades. Many Europeans want to return some powers
The document provides data and information for an afterschool agency to use in deciding where to expand their programs. They currently serve over 1,100 students ages 5-13 across 3 sites in Queens Community Board 1. The data includes demographics of current participants, school data and testing scores for three local school districts, census data on population changes of children in the areas, and guidance questions to structure their decision making process. They will use the "Ask, Assess, Decide" framework and data to determine the best location for their expansion.
Various aspects of Ukrainian society such as: Level of well-being, Tolerance, Trust, Linguistic-ethnic groups, The attitude of Ukrainians to Russia and Russians to Ukraine, Independence of Ukraine, Attitude to the EU NATO the Customs Union, Euromaidan, Propaganda, Situation in the Donbas, Migration, Volunteering
Post-Brexit, Europeans More Positive About the EU, But Want Own Referendum on...Pew Research Center
Bruce Stokes, director of global economic attitudes, presented Pew Research Center findings on European attitudes toward the European Union (EU) in Brussels, Paris, Warsaw, Berlin and London.
1) Georgia has faced a difficult geopolitical position since independence from the Soviet Union, wanting to align with the West but facing complications from Russia and internal conflicts.
2) Early nationalist policies under Zviad Gamsakhurdia exacerbated ethnic tensions that led to conflicts in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Eduard Shevardnadze then took power amid civil unrest.
3) Current relations with Russia remain icy due to the 2008 conflict and Russia's support of breakaway regions. Georgia also seeks closer ties with the EU and NATO but these aspirations are threatened by territorial disputes.
Women are still more undecided than men on how to vote in the EU referendum and less certain that they will vote. Only 56% of women feel informed enough to make a decision on how to vote. While women are more interested in the EU debate than men, only 26% say the campaigns have helped them decide how to vote. 37% of women think both sides of the debate have been too dominated by men.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, December 2018DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted between December 13-27, 2018. It provides details on the methodology, including that a representative sample of 2,400 Ukrainians were surveyed through in-person interviews. Key findings include that 32% said they definitely intend to vote in the 2019 presidential election, with Yulia Tymoshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi emerging as the top choices for president at 16% and 11% respectively. The document also examines potential second round matchups between candidates.
Social and political moods of Ukrainians, december 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from December 13-27, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents. It found that 32% said they definitely would vote in the 2019 presidential election, while 42% said they somewhat would vote. If the election was held the following Sunday, the top candidates respondents said they would vote for were Yulia Tymoshenko at 16%, Volodymyr Zelenskyi at 11%, and Petro Poroshenko at 9%. The survey also examined potential run-off election matchups between candidates.
Research which clearly shows opinion and attitude differencies between Western+Central and Southern+Eastern Ukraine. There are some questions to
- wording and formulation of questionnaire,
- some methodics of results presentation of this USA-sponsoring research,
but anyway that shows the whole picture
Public Opinion Survey: Residents of MoldovamResearcher
The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center
for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting.
Ukraine National Municipal Survey, March 2015 by IRIIlya Ponomarev
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 22 regional capitals of Ukraine between March 2-20, 2015. Some key findings:
- 68% see corruption as a significant problem in their city
- 60% see nepotism as a significant problem
- 57% think Ukraine should join the EU if it could only join one economic union
- 47% would vote for Ukraine to join NATO if a referendum were held
- 35% think their city authorities are making efforts to reduce corruption at the municipal level
The survey involved over 17,000 respondents and provides insights into citizen attitudes about local governance, services, and reforms in Ukraine.
Public Opinion PollResidents of KyrgyzstanmResearcher
В исследовании приняли участие 1 483 респондентов в возрасте от 18 лет и старше – граждане, которые уже имеют право голоса на выборах. Отмечается, что выборка была однородной по возрасту, полу и прописке.
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Ratinggroup
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. The survey was conducted by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the International Republican Institute, with funding from the National Endowment for Democracy. A multi-stage random sample of 1,200 Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older were interviewed face-to-face.
The survey found that a majority of Ukrainians believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industrial production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a customs union with Russia. Support for the
Serzh Sargsyan leads in the polls ahead of Armenia's February 2013 presidential election, receiving around 44% of the vote according to survey results. Raffi Hovhannisyan has established himself as the leading opposition candidate with around 20% support, more than all other candidates combined. While not all parties nominated a candidate, high voter turnout is expected with around 73% saying they will certainly vote. Sargsyan receives the highest ratings for experience and political power, while Hovhannisyan is seen as more caring, credible, and likeable, though voters trust Sargsyan's political program and party affiliation more. The election seems poised for Sargsyan to win in the first round, though
The second nationwide TNS opinion poll was carried out between 31 January and 5 February 2013 by its local partner IPSC. The poll was commissioned by European Friends of Armenia (www.EuFoA.org) in order to contribute to a factual debate ahead of the elections. The sample size of the survey is 1,609.
Municipal survey_May 2023_ENG - FINAL.pdfRatinggroup
The document summarizes the results of the eighth annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey conducted in April-May 2023. It was administered in 21 regional capitals not under Russian control, to a sample of 16,800 respondents. Key findings include:
- Over half of respondents believe things in their city are going in the right direction, though this varies between 39-82% across cities.
- Most respondents said their household's economic situation stayed the same (34-45%) or worsened (27-43%) over the past year.
- Respondents were cautiously optimistic about Ukraine's economic prospects, with most expecting the situation to improve (25-38%) or stay the same (22-36%) in the next
Objective: to identify the attitude of citizens of Ukraine to the socio-political and economic situation in the country, to determine the electoral preferences and level of confidence towards the civil and public institutions, as well as to form an estimate of judgments of the situation in the Donbas, e-declaration and other high-profile events
Media consumption and political preferences in Luhanska oblastDonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the results of a media consumption survey conducted in the Luhanska oblast region of Ukraine between November 2015 and March 2017. Over 28,000 respondents were interviewed across multiple regions to understand their media preferences and political views. The document outlines the methodology, sample sizes, and key findings regarding television, radio, print, online and social media usage in Luhanska oblast and some sub-regions. Television remains the most widely consumed media, while Russian and local language content is also popular alongside Ukrainian media.
2014 july 25 public opinion survey residents of moldova, june 7-27, 2014Rasa Alisauskiene
The survey was conducted in Moldova from June 7-27, 2014 with 1,200 respondents through face-to-face interviews. It is representative of Moldova's population by age, gender, education, region and settlement size. The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. Growing support for democracy was found, with satisfaction in democracy increasing and more believing the country is heading in the right direction. However, corruption and economic problems remain top concerns.
A public opinion survey was conducted in Tunisia from April 19-26, 2017 with 1,229 Tunisian respondents. The survey used a multi-stage stratified sampling method to select respondents proportionately from Tunisia's 24 governorates based on population data. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using tablets and the overall margin of error was +/- 2.85%. The survey addressed topics such as views on Tunisia's direction, the economy, priorities for government, and ratings of government performance.
Similar to Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018 (20)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
The document analyzes violations of electoral rights that occurred during elections in liberated territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in Ukraine. It describes violations during the 2014 extraordinary presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 2015 local elections, including obstacles to voting, violence against election officials, and criminal interference. The document highlights issues preventing internally displaced persons from exercising their right to vote and proposes solutions like allowing voters to change their voting address without changing their official place of residence, to integrate displaced people into their new communities while preserving electoral rights.
The document provides background information on Popasna, Ukraine and summarizes key events regarding its occupation and liberation during the 2014 conflict. It describes how Popasna came under the control of pro-Russian separatist forces in May 2014 but was liberated by Ukrainian troops on July 22, 2014. However, Popasna remained strategically important and faced repeated artillery attacks from separatists using Grads and other rocket launchers throughout the remainder of 2014, resulting in civilian casualties and property damage. The document lists numerous specific dates of artillery attacks on the city during this period.
The town of Mariinka has been at the center of conflict in eastern Ukraine since 2014. It has been repeatedly shelled by Russian-led forces, leading to numerous civilian casualties and widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure. Although a ceasefire was agreed to in Minsk, the shelling of Mariinka has continued on a near daily basis. As a result, many residents have been forced to evacuate while others live in difficult conditions, lacking basic services. Over four years of conflict, 41 residents have been killed according to official data. The constant shelling of civilian areas like Mariinka may constitute war crimes under international law.
Digest by Ukrainian Helsinki Human rights Union, April 2019DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the activities of the USAID Human Rights in Action Program implemented by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union in April 2019. It discusses the program's work on human rights monitoring, advocacy, strategic litigation, free legal aid provision, and human rights education. Key events covered include Russia simplifying citizenship for eastern Ukrainians, and the PACE keeping sanctions on Russia in place.
We are pleased to share with you the latest VCOSA statistical report on the cotton and yarn industry for the month of May 2024.
Starting from January 2024, the full weekly and monthly reports will only be available for free to VCOSA members. To access the complete weekly report with figures, charts, and detailed analysis of the cotton fiber market in the past week, interested parties are kindly requested to contact VCOSA to subscribe to the newsletter.
Build applications with generative AI on Google CloudMárton Kodok
We will explore Vertex AI - Model Garden powered experiences, we are going to learn more about the integration of these generative AI APIs. We are going to see in action what the Gemini family of generative models are for developers to build and deploy AI-driven applications. Vertex AI includes a suite of foundation models, these are referred to as the PaLM and Gemini family of generative ai models, and they come in different versions. We are going to cover how to use via API to: - execute prompts in text and chat - cover multimodal use cases with image prompts. - finetune and distill to improve knowledge domains - run function calls with foundation models to optimize them for specific tasks. At the end of the session, developers will understand how to innovate with generative AI and develop apps using the generative ai industry trends.
06-20-2024-AI Camp Meetup-Unstructured Data and Vector DatabasesTimothy Spann
Tech Talk: Unstructured Data and Vector Databases
Speaker: Tim Spann (Zilliz)
Abstract: In this session, I will discuss the unstructured data and the world of vector databases, we will see how they different from traditional databases. In which cases you need one and in which you probably don’t. I will also go over Similarity Search, where do you get vectors from and an example of a Vector Database Architecture. Wrapping up with an overview of Milvus.
Introduction
Unstructured data, vector databases, traditional databases, similarity search
Vectors
Where, What, How, Why Vectors? We’ll cover a Vector Database Architecture
Introducing Milvus
What drives Milvus' Emergence as the most widely adopted vector database
Hi Unstructured Data Friends!
I hope this video had all the unstructured data processing, AI and Vector Database demo you needed for now. If not, there’s a ton more linked below.
My source code is available here
https://github.com/tspannhw/
Let me know in the comments if you liked what you saw, how I can improve and what should I show next? Thanks, hope to see you soon at a Meetup in Princeton, Philadelphia, New York City or here in the Youtube Matrix.
Get Milvused!
https://milvus.io/
Read my Newsletter every week!
https://github.com/tspannhw/FLiPStackWeekly/blob/main/141-10June2024.md
For more cool Unstructured Data, AI and Vector Database videos check out the Milvus vector database videos here
https://www.youtube.com/@MilvusVectorDatabase/videos
Unstructured Data Meetups -
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/
https://lu.ma/calendar/manage/cal-VNT79trvj0jS8S7
https://www.meetup.com/pro/unstructureddata/
https://zilliz.com/community/unstructured-data-meetup
https://zilliz.com/event
Twitter/X: https://x.com/milvusio https://x.com/paasdev
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zilliz/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
GitHub: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus https://github.com/tspannhw
Invitation to join Discord: https://discord.com/invite/FjCMmaJng6
Blogs: https://milvusio.medium.com/ https://www.opensourcevectordb.cloud/ https://medium.com/@tspann
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/events/301383476/?slug=unstructured-data-meetup-new-york&eventId=301383476
https://www.aicamp.ai/event/eventdetails/W2024062014
Discovering Digital Process Twins for What-if Analysis: a Process Mining Appr...Marlon Dumas
This webinar discusses the limitations of traditional approaches for business process simulation based on had-crafted model with restrictive assumptions. It shows how process mining techniques can be assembled together to discover high-fidelity digital twins of end-to-end processes from event data.
PyData London 2024: Mistakes were made (Dr. Rebecca Bilbro)Rebecca Bilbro
To honor ten years of PyData London, join Dr. Rebecca Bilbro as she takes us back in time to reflect on a little over ten years working as a data scientist. One of the many renegade PhDs who joined the fledgling field of data science of the 2010's, Rebecca will share lessons learned the hard way, often from watching data science projects go sideways and learning to fix broken things. Through the lens of these canon events, she'll identify some of the anti-patterns and red flags she's learned to steer around.
06-18-2024-Princeton Meetup-Introduction to MilvusTimothy Spann
06-18-2024-Princeton Meetup-Introduction to Milvus
tim.spann@zilliz.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
https://x.com/paasdev
https://github.com/tspannhw
https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus
Get Milvused!
https://milvus.io/
Read my Newsletter every week!
https://github.com/tspannhw/FLiPStackWeekly/blob/main/142-17June2024.md
For more cool Unstructured Data, AI and Vector Database videos check out the Milvus vector database videos here
https://www.youtube.com/@MilvusVectorDatabase/videos
Unstructured Data Meetups -
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/
https://lu.ma/calendar/manage/cal-VNT79trvj0jS8S7
https://www.meetup.com/pro/unstructureddata/
https://zilliz.com/community/unstructured-data-meetup
https://zilliz.com/event
Twitter/X: https://x.com/milvusio https://x.com/paasdev
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zilliz/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyspann/
GitHub: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus https://github.com/tspannhw
Invitation to join Discord: https://discord.com/invite/FjCMmaJng6
Blogs: https://milvusio.medium.com/ https://www.opensourcevectordb.cloud/ https://medium.com/@tspann
Expand LLMs' knowledge by incorporating external data sources into LLMs and your AI applications.
2. Methodology
2
• The survey was conducted by Rating Group Ukraine on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in
Survey Research.
• The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine (except for the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas) from September 29,
2018, through October 14, 2018, through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes.
• The sample consisted of 2,400 permanent residents of Ukraine aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. It is representative of
the general population by gender, age, region, and settlement size. The distribution of population by regions and settlements
is based on statistical data of the Central Election Commission from the 2014 parliamentary elections, and the distribution of
population by age and gender is based on data from the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine from January 1, 2017.
• A multi-stage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday methods for respondent
selection.
• Stage One: The territory of Ukraine was split into 25 administrative regions (24 regions of Ukraine and Kyiv). The survey
was conducted throughout all regions of Ukraine, with the exception of the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas.
• Stage Two: The selection of settlements was based on towns and villages. Towns were grouped into subtypes according
to their size:
• Cities with populations of more than 1 million
• Cities with populations of between 500,000-999,000
• Cities with populations of between 100,000-499,000
• Cities with populations of between 50,000-99,000
• Cities with populations of up to 50,000
• Villages
Cities and villages were selected by the PPS method (probability proportional to size). The number of selected
cities/villages in each region is proportional to the share of population living in cities/villages of a certain type in each
region.
• Stage Three: Households were selected by the random route method, and respondents were selected by the “last
birthday” rule.
• The margin of error does not exceed 2.0 percent for the full sample.
• The response rate is 61.8 percent percent.
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
• The survey was financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
3. 3
Geographical Key
*Due to the Russian occupation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, residents of Crimea and the so-
called separatist-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts (“the Donbas”) were not surveyed in this poll.
10. Do you intend to vote in the presidential election scheduled for
March 2019?
10
34%
43%
6%
12%
5%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
11. 11
(Disaggregated by region, age)
28%
34%
40%
28%
33%
34%
41%
46%
42%
41%
42%
41%
43%
44%
7%
6%
4%
9%
6%
5%
3%
13%
14%
9%
16%
15%
10%
8%
6%
5%
6%
5%
4%
7%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
18-35
36-50
51+
East
South
Center
West
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you intend to vote in the presidential election scheduled for
March 2019?
13. If the presidential election were held next Sunday and the
following candidates participated in the election, which of them
would you vote for?
13
17%
14%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
4%
4%
4%
6%
7%
8%
8%
14%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Oleksandr Vilkul
Roman Bezsmertnyi
Vitaliy Skotsyk
Serhiy Taruta
Valentyn Nalyvaichenko
Oleh Tyahnybok
Andriy Sadovyi
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleh Liashko
Vadym Rabinovych
Yuriy Boyko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Petro Poroshenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
(All respondents)
14. 14
(Likely voters: n=1,851)
17%
5%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
4%
5%
5%
8%
9%
10%
10%
17%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Oleksandr Vilkul
Roman Bezsmertnyi
Vitaliy Skotsyk
Serhiy Taruta
Valentyn Nalyvaichenko
Oleh Tyahnybok
Andriy Sadovyi
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleh Liashko
Vadym Rabinovych
Yuriy Boyko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Petro Poroshenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
If the presidential election were held next Sunday and the
following candidates participated in the election, which of them
would you vote for?
15. Do you think that the democratic opposition to the current
authorities should have a single candidate for the presidential
election?
15
40%
20%
40%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer/No answer
16. 16
Who, in your opinion, should be the single candidate for the
presidential election from the democratic opposition to current
authorities?
24%
18%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
8%
17%
22%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Svitlana Zalishchuk
Oleksandr Solontay
Hanna Hopko
Yuriy Derevyanko
Serhiy Leshchenko
Vasyl Hatsko
Mustafa Nayem
Viktor Chumak
Yehor Sobolyev
Andriy Sadovyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
(Those who think that democratic opposition should have a single candidate: n=971)
17. What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
17
48%
44%
8%
Candidate’s ability to provide changes
Candidate’s ability to ensure stability
Difficult to answer/No answer
18. 69%
65%
59%
57%
54%
52%
52%
46%
42%
23%
41%
44%
27%
35%
33%
38%
42%
44%
44%
52%
53%
69%
41%
47%
4%
1%
8%
5%
4%
4%
4%
2%
5%
9%
19%
9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Petro Poroshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Liashko
Vadym Rabinovych
Yuriy Boyko
Would not vote
Undecided
Candidate's ability to provide changes Candidate's ability to ensure stability Difficult to answer/No answer
18
What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
(Disaggregated by presidential candidate preference)
19. What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
19
46%
43%
11%
Candidate should have experience in
politics and governance
Candidate should represent a new
generation of politicians
Difficult to answer/No answer
20. 20
What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
74%
72%
69%
65%
58%
55%
42%
24%
16%
11%
22%
34%
16%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
51%
73%
79%
87%
52%
49%
10%
8%
6%
4%
7%
4%
7%
3%
5%
2%
26%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yuriy Boyko
Petro Poroshenko
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Liashko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Vadym Rabinovych
Andriy Sadovyi
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Would not vote
Undecided
Candidate should have experience in politics and governance
Candidate should represent a new generation of politicians
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by presidential candidate preference)
21. What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
21
54%
19%
27% Ability of candidate to ensure better
cooperation with the West
Ability of candidate to ensure better
cooperation with the Russian
Federation
Difficult to answer/No answer
22. 22
What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
83%
82%
77%
77%
76%
64%
62%
55%
32%
13%
30%
51%
9%
7%
11%
12%
10%
15%
15%
19%
45%
62%
20%
13%
8%
11%
12%
11%
14%
21%
24%
26%
22%
25%
50%
36%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Petro Poroshenko
Andriy Sadovyi
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Yulia Tymoshenko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Oleh Liashko
Vadym Rabinovych
Yuriy Boyko
Do not vote
Undecided
Ability of candidate to ensure better cooperation with the West
Ability of candidate to ensure better cooperation with the Russian Federation
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by presidential candidate preference)
23. What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
23
47%
42%
11%
Candidate should be a strong leader
Candidate should have a strong team
Difficult to answer/No answer
24. 24
What is your key reason to vote for a particular candidate in the
upcoming presidential election?
60%
58%
54%
53%
52%
49%
47%
44%
37%
33%
41%
40%
34%
39%
46%
40%
41%
46%
45%
46%
52%
56%
34%
43%
6%
7%
7%
5%
8%
10%
11%
10%
25%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yulia Tymoshenko
Oleh Liashko
Oleksandr Shevchenko
Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Petro Poroshenko
Sviatoslav Vakarchuk
Vadym Rabinovych
Yuriy Boyko
Volodymyr Zelenskyi
Andriy Sadovyi
Would not vote
Undecided
Candidate should be a strong leader Candidate should have a strong team Difficult to answer/No answer
(Disaggregated by presidential candidate preference)
3%
25. 25
Once you have decided on a candidate for whom to vote, how
likely are you to change your mind in the months leading up to the
election?
9%
20%
40%
12%
19%
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Somewhat unlikely
Very unlikely
Difficult to answer/No answer
28. Do you intend to vote in the parliamentary elections scheduled for
October 2019?
28
30%
43%
8%
12%
7%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
29. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, which
political party would you vote for?
29
18%
16%
4%
<1%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
4%
4%
6%
6%
6%
7%
14%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
I would not vote
Other
Revival Party (Vidodzehnnia)
Narodnyi Front
Nash Krai
Socialist Party
Movement of New Forces
Justice
Democratic Alliance
Osnova
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
UKROP
Svoboda
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
Radical Party
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Opposition Bloc
Civic Position
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP Solidarnist)
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
(All respondents)
30. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated in the election, which
political party would you vote for?
30
(Among likely voters: n=1,751)
18%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
3%
3%
4%
5%
5%
8%
8%
8%
9%
17%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer/No answer
Other
Socialist Party
Narodnyi Front
Nash Krai
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Movement of New Forces
Osnova
Justice
Democratic Alliance
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
UKROP
Svoboda
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
Radical Party
For Life (Za Zhyttia)
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
Opposition Bloc
Civic Position
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP Solidarnist)
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
31. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, which other
political party would you vote for if the party that you have
chosen above did not participate in the elections?
31
8%
31%
19%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
3%
4%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
No answer
Difficult to answer
I would not vote
Other
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
National Corps
Nash Krai
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP Solidarnist)
Socialist Party
Osnova
Movement of New Forces
Justice
UDAR
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Narodnyi Front
Svoboda
UKROP
Opposition Bloc
Radical Party
For Life (Za Zhyttia)
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Servant of the People (Sluha Naroda)
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
(All respondents)
32. 32
(Among likely voters: n=1,751)
47%
3%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
4%
4%
4%
5%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
No answer/Difficult to answer
Other
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
National Corps
Nash Krai
Socialist Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko (BPP Solidarnist)
UDAR
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Osnova
Narodnyi Front
Movement of New Forces
Justice
Svoboda
UKROP
Opposition Bloc
For Life (Za Zhyttia)
Radical Party
Civic Position
Servant of the People (Sluha Narodu)
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, which other
political party would you vote for if the party that you have
chosen above did not participate in the elections?
40. Which three of the following issues are the most important for
Ukraine?
(Multiple responses permitted)
40
57%
49%
26%
24%
22%
21%
15%
13%
11%
11%
9%
9%
8%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Military conflict in Donbas
Corruption within the state bodies
Low industry production
Growth of prices
Unemployment
Government incompetence
Political instability
Social protection for the poor
Hryvnia devaluation
Relations with Russia
Crime
Healthcare
Russian presence in Crimea
Environment
Delay in salary/pension payments
Lack/Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Rights to land ownership
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
41. Which three of the following issues are the most important for you
personally?
(Multiple responses permitted)
41
68%
29%
27%
24%
22%
20%
17%
11%
10%
10%
10%
9%
7%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
6%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Growth of prices
Military conflict in Donbas
Hryvnia devaluation
Unemployment
Healthcare
Social protection for the poor
Corruption within the state bodies
Low industry production
Lack/Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Government incompetence
Crime
Delay in salary/pension payments
Political instability
Environment
Relations with Russia
Rights to land ownership
Russian presence in Crimea
Russian language status
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
43. Have you or your family members signed a contract with your
family doctor in the last six months?*
43
59%
34%
7%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer/No answer
*In October 2017, the Ukrainian parliament passed sweeping healthcare reform, allowing, among other
things, Ukrainians to choose their own doctor as opposed to being required to seek treatment only at clinics
near their legally registered address.
45. 45
10%
30%
17%
11%
32%
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Difficult to answer/No answer
What do you think of the key component for the new healthcare
reform, whereby state budget money "follows the patient" and is
paid to the family doctor or medical professional selected by the
patient to provide services?
47. Do you support the establishment of the Autocephalous Orthodox
Ukrainian Church?
47
20%
22%
19%
25%
11%
13%
18%
15%
32%
27%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
June 2018
September 2018
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
*Autocephaly would establish a united Ukrainian Orthodox Church independent from the Moscow Patriarchate.
48. 48
10%
17%
11%
30%
36%
22%
17%
13%
22%
36%
30%
25%
19%
6%
17%
10%
8%
13%
27%
27%
18%
3%
6%
15%
27%
37%
32%
20%
20%
27%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Orthodox, Moscow Patriarchate (n=427)
Atheist (n=133)
I believe in God, but do not belong to any
religion (n=715)
Orthodox, Kyiv Patriarchate (n=776)
Greek Catholic (n=208)
All respondents
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you support the establishment of the Autocephalous Orthodox
Ukrainian Church?
(Disaggregated by religious affiliation)
49. In your opinion, will the establishment of the independent
Autocephalous Orthodox Ukrainian Church foster unity or increase
division within the country?
49
34%
19%
24%
23%
It will foster unity of the
country
It will have no impact on the
country
It will increase division within
the country
Difficult to answer/No answer
50. 50
17%
22%
18%
53%
51%
34%
13%
22%
29%
13%
20%
19%
45%
32%
29%
11%
11%
24%
24%
25%
24%
23%
18%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Orthodox, Moscow Patriarchate (n=427)
I believe in God, but do not belong to any
religion (n=715)
Atheist (n=133)
Greek Catholic (n=208)
Orthodox, Kyiv Patriarchate (n=776)
All respondents
It will foster unity of the country It will have no impact on the country
It will increase division within the country Difficult to answer/No answer
In your opinion, will the establishment of the independent
Autocephalous Orthodox Ukrainian Church foster unity or increase
division within the country?
(Disaggregated by religious affiliation)
51. 51
72%
13%
19%
72%
3%
15%
6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Do not support establishment of the
Autocephalous Orthodox Ukrainian Church
(n=649)
Support establishment of the Autocephalous
Orthodox Ukrainian Church (n=1,106)
It will foster unification of the country It will have no impact in the country
It will increase division of the country Difficult to answer/No answer
<1%
In your opinion, will the establishment of the independent
Autocephalous Orthodox Ukrainian Church foster unity or increase
division within the country?
(Disaggregated by religious support for establishment of Autocephalous Church)
53. Are you personally considering the idea of emigrating abroad to
find work?
53
29%
64%
7%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer/No answer
54. 54
(Disaggregated by region, age)
11%
36%
47%
23%
28%
31%
31%
84%
56%
45%
72%
63%
61%
62%
5%
9%
9%
5%
9%
8%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
South
East
Center
West
Yes No Difficult to answer/No answer
Are you personally considering the idea of emigrating abroad to
find work?
55. Do you have a relative or friend who is currently abroad working
or looking for work?
55
48%
48%
4%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer/No answer
56. 56
(Disaggregated by region, age)
37%
56%
57%
40%
43%
44%
65%
58%
41%
41%
55%
54%
52%
33%
5%
3%
2%
4%
3%
4%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
51+
36-50
18-35
East
South
Center
West
Yes No Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you have a relative or friend who is currently abroad working
or looking for work?
57. 57
What is the key reason why you are considering emigrating
abroad?
38%
31%
27%
2% 2%
I am forced to do so to satisfy basic needs
of my family
I would like to achieve self-fulfillment and
find new opportunities
I do not see any future in Ukraine
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Among those who considering emigrating abroad to find work: n=685)
58. 58
In your opinion, after the next presidential election in Ukraine (in
the event the candidate you voted for does not win), will you be
more or less likely to consider emigrating abroad to find work
there?
8%
65%
9%
18%
More likely
Elections will have no influence on
my decision
Less likely
Difficult to answer/No answer
59. 59
2%
19%
72%
56%
11%
4%
15%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Do not consider emigrating abroad to find
work (n=1,546)
Consider emigrating abroad to find work
(n=685)
More likely Elections will have no influence on my decision Less likely Difficult to answer/No answer
In your opinion, after the next presidential election in Ukraine (in
the event the candidate you voted for does not win), will you be
more or less likely to consider idea of emigrating abroad to find
work there?
(Disaggregated by receptiveness to emigration)
65. 65
How do you evaluate your attitude toward each of the following
countries?
36%
27% 28% 23%
6%
9% 9%
17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Sep.15 Dec.17 Mar.18 Sep.18
Warm Cold
30%
23% 26%
22%
7% 9% 8%
12%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Sep.15 Dec.17 Mar.18 Sep.18
RomaniaHungary
66. 66
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
36%
37%
32%
40%
42%
41%
52%
53%
59%
55%
57%
57%
55%
54%
51%
53%
54%
52%
50%
52%
52%
54%
43%
41%
42%
37%
37%
36%
27%
24%
17%
14%
17%
15%
15%
15%
19%
18%
18%
14%
16%
18%
15%
14%
4%
5%
6%
5%
5%
9%
6%
10%
9%
12%
12%
12%
14%
12%
14%
14%
8%
9%
10%
15%
17%
16%
17%
17%
20%
18%
17%
14%
14%
13%
15%
20%
14%
16%
15%
19%
17%
15%
20%
24%
24%
14%
16%
16%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2012
May 2012
September 2012
May 2013
September 2013
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
September 2018
European Union Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan Other Difficult to answer/No answer
67. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
67
9%
23%
38%
11%
20%
20%
27%
20%
14%
42%
18%
15%
12%
19%
13%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukraine should develop and follow the path of integration
with the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
Ukraine should develop and follow its own independent
path, refusing integration with the EU and Customs Union
Ukraine should develop and follow the path of integration
with the European Union
Fully agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Completely disagree Difficult to answer/No answer
68. 68
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Ukraine should develop and follow its own independent path, refusing
integration with the EU and Customs Union.
(Disaggregated by preferred international economic union)
63%
20%
12%
23%
28%
16%
5%
25%
28%
3%
10%
29%
7%
18%
16%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other (n=395)
Support integration with the Customs Union
(n=333)
Support integration with the EU (n=1,292)
Fully agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Completely disagree Difficult to answer/No answer
69. If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
69
34%
38%
43%
41%
48%
48%
45%
39%
43%
46%
40%
34%
37%
43%
43%
45%
43%
40%
31%
30%
28%
30%
30%
32%
29%
27%
27%
26%
26%
33%
33%
31%
9%
7%
17%
14%
8%
10%
10%
12%
11%
12%
12%
15%
12%
7%
8%
8%
13%
15%
8%
15%
17%
13%
16%
17%
17%
14%
22%
24%
26%
17%
16%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017
March 2018
June 2018
September 2018
Would vote for Ukraine to join NATO Would vote against Ukraine joining NATO Would not vote Difficult to answer/No answer
71. 71
Which of these sources of information do you use for obtaining
political information?
75%
39%
33%
34%
29%
15%
12%
11%
7%
6%
3%
3%
3%
1%
<1%
2%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
National Ukrainian TV – news, programs
Internet – websites
Relatives, friends
Internet – social media
Local TV (of your city/region) – news, programs
Ukrainian radio – news, programs
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and magazines
Colleagues at work
Russian TV – news, programs
Billboards, stands in the streets
Leaflets, other free information by post
Russian radio – news, programs
Meetings with politicians
Articles in Russian newspapers and magazines
Other
None
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
72. 72
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
National Ukrainian TV 61% 77% 84% 77% 73% 76% 71%
Internet – websites 59% 47% 20% 38% 42% 37% 39%
Relatives, friends 31% 32% 35% 31% 29% 40% 34%
Internet – social media 55% 41% 14% 38% 31% 35% 33%
Local TV (of your city/region) 21% 30% 35% 29% 24% 39% 27%
Ukrainian radio 9% 14% 21% 17% 16% 14% 13%
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and magazines 7% 9% 18% 12% 16% 9% 10%
Colleagues at work 13% 15% 8% 10% 10% 14% 12%
Russian TV 3% 7% 9% 3% 5% 9% 13%
Billboards, stands in the streets 5% 6% 6% 4% 6% 7% 5%
Leaflets, other free information by post 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 6%
Russian radio 2% 3% 4% 2% 3% 2% 4%
Meetings with politicians 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3%
Articles in Russian newspapers and magazines - 1% 1% 1% - - 1%
Other - 1% - 1% - - 1%
None 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% - 1%
Difficult to answer/No answer 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 5%
(Disaggregated by age, region)
Which of these sources of information do you use to obtain
political information?
73. 73
Batkivshchyna
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ZaZhyttia
Samopomich
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
SluhaNarodu
UKROP
Wouldnotvote
Undecided
National Ukrainian TV 79% 70% 80% 79% 79% 78% 83% 73% 71% 84% 64% 75%
Internet – websites 33% 42% 37% 21% 48% 27% 22% 44% 56% 44% 39% 43%
Relatives, friends 32% 30% 38% 31% 32% 35% 21% 35% 40% 37% 34% 33%
Internet – social media 32% 33% 29% 21% 43% 28% 19% 31% 52% 55% 30% 37%
Local TV (of your city/region) 33% 37% 28% 38% 32% 41% 26% 29% 28% 42% 22% 24%
Ukrainian radio 17% 17% 21% 13% 13% 22% 21% 16% 13% 17% 10% 12%
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and
magazines
18% 15% 15% 7% 8% 19% 17% 5% 10% 19% 6% 9%
Colleagues at work 8% 9% 13% 7% 16% 10% 4% 9% 20% 22% 11% 14%
Russian TV 7% 5% 8% 12% 5% 13% 6% 4% 5% 10% 7% 4%
Billboards, stands in the streets 6% 4% 6% 5% 2% 5% 2% 6% 9% 23% 3% 5%
Leaflets, other free information by
post
5% 2% 5% 2% 5% 3% 3% 1% 5% 20% 1% 1%
Russian radio 4% 2% 3% 4% 0% 6% 8% - 1% 1% 2% 2%
Meetings with politicians 2% 5% 7% 2% 6% 2% 4% 2% 4% 12% 2% 3%
Articles in Russian newspapers and
magazines
- - 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 1% 4% - -
Other - - - 2% - - - 2% - - - 1%
None 1% - 1% 2% 2% 5% - - 1% 3% 4% 2%
Difficult to answer/No answer 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% - - 2% - 2% 2%
(Disaggregated by first choice in parliamentary elections)
Which of these sources of information do you use to obtain
political information?
74. 74
How often do you seek an additional source of information to
verify a claim you have heard?
5%
11%
38%
31%
15%
Always
Most of the time
Sometimes
Never
Difficult to answer/No answer
75. 75
Where are you most likely to see false or misleading information?
(Multiple responses accepted)
44%
15%
14%
14%
10%
4%
4%
4%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
1%
5%
23%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
National Ukrainian TV – news, programs
Internet – websites
Russian TV – news, programs
Internet – social media
Local TV (of your city/region) – news, programs
Relatives, friends
Russian radio – news, programs
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and magazines
Ukrainian radio – news, programs
Articles in Russian newspapers and magazines
Billboards, stands in the streets
Leaflets, other free information by post
Meetings with politicians
Colleagues at work
Other
None
Difficult to answer/No answer
76. 76
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
National Ukrainian TV 38% 45% 48% 41% 37% 56% 45%
Internet – web-sites 21% 17% 10% 12% 16% 16% 17%
Relatives, friends 23% 16% 7% 15% 11% 18% 16%
Internet – social media 13% 16% 14% 20% 14% 11% 11%
Local TV (of your city/region) 8% 10% 12% 10% 5% 16% 13%
Ukrainian radio 3% 4% 6% 4% 6% 3% 4%
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and magazines 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 7% 6%
Colleagues at work 4% 5% 4% 8% 4% 3% 1%
Russian TV 2% 4% 5% 2% 3% 5% 4%
Billboards, stands in the streets 3% 3% 3% 6% 2% 2% 1%
Leaflets, other free information by post 3% 4% 2% 5% 1% 3% 2%
Russian radio 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2%
Meetings with politicians 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1%
Articles in Russian newspapers and magazines 1% 2% 2% - 2% 3% 2%
Other 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1%
None 4% 4% 5% 7% 7% 1% 1%
Difficult to answer/No answer 23% 20% 25% 22% 27% 17% 28%
(Disaggregated by age, region)
Where are you most likely to see false or misleading information?
77. 77
Batkivshchyna
BPPSolidarnist
CivicPosition
ZaZhyttia
Samopomich
OppositionBloc
RadicalParty
Svoboda
SluhaNarodu
UKROP
WOuldnotvote
Undecided
National Ukrainian TV 50% 30% 38% 58% 33% 55% 45% 48% 43% 38% 46% 44%
Internet – websites 14% 17% 19% 13% 9% 9% 6% 22% 28% 19% 14% 14%
Relatives, friends 11% 19% 11% 15% 18% 15% 7% 10% 23% 25% 14% 11%
Internet – social media 15% 17% 15% 9% 19% 13% 16% 23% 9% 33% 8% 14%
Local TV (of your city/region) 12% 12% 6% 19% 6% 11% 7% 6% 8% 6% 15% 6%
Ukrainian radio 4% 2% 4% 6% 5% 6% 9% 2% 8% 8% 3% 3%
Articles in Ukrainian newspapers and
magazines
4% 10% 2% 9% 1% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4%
Colleagues at work 5% 9% 6% 0% 18% 1% 3% 5% 1% 9% 3% 5%
Russian TV 3% 6% 2% 5% 6% 7% 4% 4% 2% 1% 3% 3%
Billboards, stands in the streets 4% 4% 4% 0% 11% 4% 3% 1% 2% 5% 1% 2%
Leaflets, other free information by
post
1% 1% 3% 2% 6% 2% 4% 8% 2% 10% 2% 2%
Russian radio 1% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 5% 3% 2% 10% 2% 2%
Meetings with politicians - 2% 3% 0% 5% 1% 5% 5% 3% - 2% 2%
Articles in Russian newspapers and
magazines
1% 4% - 2% - 1% 1% - 4% - 1% 3%
Other 1% - 1% 0% - 1% - 1% 2% - 1% 1%
None 6% 5% 4% 4% 14% 4% 5% 5% 3% 7% 5% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 22% 19% 20% 17% 20% 22% 21% 12% 22% 11% 28% 28%
(Disaggregated by first choice in parliamentary elections)
Where are you most likely to see false or misleading information?
78. 78
Do you believe your community has a higher degree of
vulnerability to disinformation due to the war on the Donbas?
15%
32%
18%
9%
26% Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Somewhat no
Definitely no
Difficult to answer/No answer
79. 79
12%
15%
19%
17%
31%
30%
29%
44%
18%
18%
19%
13%
8%
10%
10%
6%
32%
26%
24%
20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Center
South
West
East
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer/No answer
Do you believe your community has a higher degree of
vulnerability to disinformation due to the war on the Donbas?
(Disaggregated by region)
80. 80
What do you believe are the most efficient methods to combat
disinformation?
37%
32%
27%
21%
16%
14%
2%
20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Fact-checking opportunities
Education to spot disinformation
Banning media outlets known to feature disinformation
content
Blocking social network individuals known to feature
disinformation content
Warning labels on potential disinformation content
Ratings system for the credibility of various media outlets
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
(Multiple responses permitted)
81. 81
18-35 36-50 51+ West Center South East
Fact-checking opportunities 38% 42% 33% 34% 37% 37% 41%
Education to spot disinformation 32% 30% 32% 35% 28% 34% 30%
Banning media outlets known to
feature disinformation content
28% 28% 26% 29% 24% 32% 22%
Blocking social network individuals
known to feature disinformation
content
24% 24% 17% 23% 18% 27% 14%
Warning labels on potential
disinformation content
16% 16% 16% 16% 14% 20% 15%
Ratings system for the credibility
of various media outlets
17% 16% 10% 10% 14% 13% 24%
Other 3% 2% 2% 1% 3% 4% 2%
Difficult to answer/No answer 15% 16% 25% 19% 19% 20% 20%
(Disaggregated by age, region)
What do you believe are the most efficient methods to combat
disinformation?
83. 83
45%
55%
31%
26%
42%
4%
24%
37%
34%
1%
46%
37%
15%
2%
1%
25%
<1%
13%
5%
27%
4%
8%
6%
5%
5%
1%
67%
33%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Non-complete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Non-complete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
City
Village
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
SETTLE
MENT
TYPE
Demographics
84. 84
52%
27%
19%
91%
6%
3%
1%
32%
18%
9%
1%
1%
<1%
<1%
6%
30%
1%
3%
98%
<1%
1%
<1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENAT
HOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMBERSHIP
Demographics
85. 85
12%
33%
40%
11%
2%
<1%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money to buy clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and
shoes, but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases
like a good suit, a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing
more expensive things (e.g. appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases
like a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Demographics
86. Public Opinion Survey of
Residents of Ukraine:
Four Municipalities
September 29–October 17, 2018
87. Methodology
87
• The survey was conducted by Rating Group Ukraine on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center
for Insights in Survey Research.
• The survey was conducted in the cities of Kherson, Rivne, Severodonetsk and Slovyansk through face-to-face
interviews at respondents’ homes between September 29 and October 17, 2018.
• The sample consisted of 1,200 residents of each municipality aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. It is
representative of the general population by gender and age. The distribution of population by region of the city
is based on statistical data from the Central Election Commission from the 2014 parliamentary elections, which
divided the city into electoral districts. The distribution of population by gender and age is based on data from
the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine from January 1, 2017.
• A multi-stage probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday methods for
respondent selection.
• The margin of error does not exceed 2.8 percent.
• The response percent for the full sample per municipality are as follows:
• Kherson: 66.7 percent
• Rivne: 69.2 percent
• Severodonetsk: 63.8 percent
• Slovyansk: 62.9 percent
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
• The survey was financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
88. Generally speaking, do you think that things in your city are going
in the right direction or wrong direction?
88
38%
11%
48%
19%
35%
68%
30%
71%
26%
21%
22%
9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Slovyansk
Severodonetsk
Rivne
Kherson
Right direction Wrong direction Difficult to answer/No answer
91. 91
In the past two years, have you had to interact with your city
government offices (mayoral office, executive committee, city
council, rayon council, rayon administration, communal
enterprises)?
32%
16%
21%
17%
65%
82%
71%
79%
3%
2%
9%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Slovyansk
Severodonetsk
Rivne
Kherson
Yes No Difficult to answer/No answer
92. 92
19%
15% 17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Mar.18 Jun.18 Sep.18
In the past two years, have you had to interact with your city
government offices (mayoral office, executive committee, city council,
rayon council, rayon administration, communal enterprises)?
(Percentage of “yes” responses; March, June and September 2018)
Kherson
13%
17%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Mar.18 Jun.18 Sep.18
8% 10%
16%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Mar.18 Jun.18 Sep.18
17%
28%
32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Mar.18 Jun.18 Sep.18
Slovyansk
Rivne
Severodonetsk
93. How would you rate the ease of accessibility of information about
your mayor?
93
8%
8%
7%
4%
41%
37%
39%
25%
27%
29%
25%
37%
6%
7%
7%
16%
19%
19%
22%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Slovyansk
Severodonetsk
Rivne
Kherson
Easily accessible Somewhat accessible Somewhat inaccessible
Inaccessible Difficult to answer/No answer
94. How would you rate the ease of accessibility of information about
your city councilmembers?
94
8%
8%
7%
4%
35%
39%
37%
26%
30%
27%
24%
38%
7%
8%
9%
16%
21%
19%
23%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Slovyansk
Severodonetsk
Rivne
Kherson
Easily accessible Somewhat accessible Somewhat inaccessible
Inaccessible Difficult to answer/No answer
95. How would you rate the ease of accessibility of information about
your communal enterprises?
95
14%
12%
9%
4%
39%
46%
43%
38%
21%
20%
22%
29%
8%
8%
6%
12%
18%
15%
20%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Slovyansk
Severodonetsk
Rivne
Kherson
Easily accessible Somewhat accessible Somewhat inaccessible
Inaccessible Difficult to answer/No answer
96. 1%
4%
7%
9%
8%
14%
18%
24%
22%
24%
38%
47%
46%
43%
43%
35%
22%
17%
19%
20%
8%
5%
2%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Waiting time (if addressed personally, not through
telephone, post, etc.)
Quality of service received
Manner in which office staff treated me
Level of office staff’s knowledge on the subject
matter
How simple and clear the decisions and/or advice
provided by the officials were
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
96
Kherson
How would you rate the service you received from the local
authorities?
(Those who have interacted with city government offices in the past two years: n=201)
97. 4%
5%
3%
5%
4%
36%
37%
44%
36%
39%
36%
34%
32%
36%
34%
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
4%
6%
3%
3%
4%
6%
6%
3%
6%
4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Waiting time (if addressed personally, not through
telephone, post, etc.)
Quality of service received
Manner in which office staff treated me
Level of office staff’s knowledge on the subject
matter
How simple and clear the decisions and/or advice
provided by the officials were
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
97
Rivne
How would you rate the service you received from the local
authorities?
(Those who have interacted with city government offices in the past two years: n=248)
98. 1%
9%
12%
9%
9%
35%
35%
41%
42%
38%
43%
31%
31%
30%
26%
17%
19%
12%
12%
20%
4%
4%
2%
5%
4%
1%
2%
1%
2%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Waiting time (if addressed personally, not through
telephone, post, etc.)
Quality of service received
Manner in which office staff treated me
Level of office staff’s knowledge on the subject
matter
How simple and clear the decisions and/or advice
provided by the officials were
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
98
Severodonetsk
How would you rate the service you received from the local
authorities?
(Those who have interacted with city government offices in the past two years, n=187)
99. 3%
4%
4%
2%
4%
25%
28%
28%
27%
29%
40%
40%
48%
36%
37%
22%
18%
15%
17%
15%
7%
7%
3%
8%
8%
4%
3%
3%
10%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Waiting time (if addressed personally, not through
telephone, post, etc.)
Quality of service received
Manner in which office staff treated me
Level of office staff’s knowledge on the subject
matter
How simple and clear the decisions and/or advice
provided by the officials were
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
99
Slovyansk
How would you rate the service you received from the local
authorities?
(Those who have interacted with city government offices in the past two years: n=383)
100. 100
Kherson
How would you rate the quality of each of the following services
and/or public goods that are available in your city?
<1%
1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
1%
<1%
2%
<1%
1%
1%
2%
<1%
<1%
1%
<1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
5%
6%
6%
7%
9%
9%
10%
13%
14%
16%
19%
20%
19%
23%
25%
24%
25%
27%
27%
30%
24%
17%
32%
30%
47%
35%
30%
50%
45%
46%
49%
40%
41%
49%
41%
45%
52%
36%
51%
52%
53%
50%
44%
36%
41%
35%
24%
37%
33%
23%
30%
23%
26%
27%
30%
18%
25%
24%
10%
22%
12%
8%
6%
11%
27%
44%
19%
25%
18%
14%
25%
7%
10%
15%
5%
6%
8%
8%
10%
5%
4%
12%
3%
3%
4%
3%
4%
2%
2%
3%
4%
7%
3%
11%
4%
3%
5%
11%
2%
4%
3%
3%
9%
5%
8%
9%
8%
3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Industrial development
Roads
Sidewalks
Accessibility for persons with disabilities
Medical institutions
Parking
Transportation infrastructure/Public transport
Sports facilities (stadiums, sports clubs, etc.)
Yards and areas near buildings
Environment
Public parks and gardens
Police activities
Trash collection
Sewage
Street lighting
Street markets and trade premises
Universities, technical institutes, colleges
Heating
Cultural premises (concert halls, libraries, etc.)
Kindergartens
Schools
Water supply
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
101. 101
Kherson
In your opinion, which areas should be a top priority for your municipal
authorities?
(No more than three responses)
March 2018 June 2018 September 2018
Roads 48% 54% 50%
Housing and communal services 33% 30% 44%
Medical institutions 30% 39% 31%
Public transportation 22% 25% 30%
Industrial areas/Industrial development 12% 18% 17%
Securing transparency and openness of the municipal authorities 7% 12% 14%
Security 13% 8% 13%
Social assistance 20% 18% 13%
Sidewalks 6% 9% 9%
Environment 7% 7% 7%
Trash collection 9% 4% 6%
Yards and areas near houses 5% 3% 6%
Street lighting 9% 6% 5%
Heating 6% 1% 5%
Schools 8% 4% 4%
Kindergartens 5% 4% 4%
Land issues 3% 3% 4%
Parking 3% 2% 3%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities 5% 11% 3%
Sport facilities (stadiums, sport clubs, etc.) 4% 4% 3%
Sewage 3% 2% 3%
Administrative services provision 6% 5% 2%
Public parks and gardens 3% 3% 2%
Water supply 3% 1% 2%
Citizen participation in the decision-making process 6% 6% 1%
Street markets 2% 3% 1%
Cultural premises 2% 3% 0%
Other 0% 1% 2%
Difficult to answer/No answer 2% 2% 2%
102. 102
Rivne
How would you rate the quality of each of the following services
and/or public goods that are available in your city?
1%
2%
2%
3%
2%
4%
4%
3%
2%
2%
4%
4%
2%
3%
5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
2%
6%
4%
10%
12%
14%
16%
17%
20%
20%
24%
27%
27%
27%
27%
29%
30%
29%
33%
34%
38%
38%
43%
41%
45%
28%
31%
36%
28%
51%
42%
38%
45%
54%
48%
51%
45%
36%
45%
42%
46%
42%
43%
40%
27%
42%
39%
33%
33%
29%
37%
20%
19%
25%
14%
13%
16%
6%
16%
25%
16%
10%
6%
13%
12%
7%
17%
7%
8%
24%
17%
14%
14%
6%
4%
11%
5%
4%
4%
1%
6%
7%
4%
1%
1%
3%
2%
2%
7%
1%
3%
5%
5%
6%
1%
3%
11%
3%
9%
1%
2%
11%
2%
1%
2%
13%
10%
3%
1%
9%
4%
3%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities
Parking
Industrial development
Roads
Medical institutions
Sports facilities (stadiums, sports clubs, etc.)
Environment
Police activities
Sidewalks
Yards and areas near buildings
Universities, technical institutes, colleges
Transportation infrastructure/Public transport
Trash collection
Sewage
Kindergartens
Schools
Street markets and trade premises
Street lighting
Cultural premises (concert halls, libraries, etc.)
Heating
Public parks and gardens
Water supply
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
103. 103
Rivne
In your opinion, which areas should be a top priority for your municipal
authorities?
(No more than three responses)
March 2018 June 2018 September 2018
Housing and communal services 22% 35% 33%
Roads 52% 34% 27%
Medical institutions 30% 20% 25%
Social assistance 16% 14% 18%
Trash collection 13% 9% 16%
Public transportation 11% 15% 14%
Yards and areas near houses 8% 10% 12%
Industrial areas/Industrial development 9% 13% 12%
Environment 8% 12% 11%
Security 9% 14% 10%
Securing transparency and openness of the municipal authorities 8% 7% 10%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities 8% 7% 9%
Heating 5% 4% 9%
Parking 6% 7% 8%
Schools 9% 5% 8%
Kindergartens 12% 7% 7%
Citizen participation in the decision-making process 4% 7% 5%
Land issues 3% 5% 4%
Sport facilities (stadiums, sport clubs, etc.) 5% 2% 4%
Water supply 2% 5% 4%
Street markets 3% 2% 4%
Sewage 3% 5% 4%
Sidewalks 6% 5% 3%
Street lighting 4% 4% 3%
Cultural premises 3% 2% 3%
Administrative services provision 3% 4% 3%
Public parks and gardens 3% 3% 3%
Other 2% 1% 3%
Difficult to answer/No answer 2% 2% 2%
104. 104
Severodonetsk
How would you rate the quality of each of the following services
and/or public goods that are available in your city?
<1%
<1%
<1%
1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
<1%
1%
2%
8%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
5%
9%
13%
15%
17%
27%
28%
28%
29%
32%
40%
50%
51%
56%
61%
58%
69%
4%
14%
35%
12%
38%
40%
55%
46%
36%
53%
60%
38%
59%
57%
44%
32%
28%
29%
28%
33%
29%
27%
66%
64%
49%
68%
52%
42%
31%
13%
19%
16%
10%
10%
8%
11%
15%
2%
1%
1%
1%
3%
3%
2%
28%
20%
14%
14%
6%
10%
4%
2%
4%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
4%
<1%
1%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
<1%
1%
1%
<1%
4%
1%
2%
<1%
26%
27%
12%
1%
23%
4%
1%
4%
25%
20%
19%
13%
1%
1%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Industrial development
Roads
Sidewalks
Accessibility for persons with disabilities
Yards and areas near buildings
Public parks and gardens
Trash collection
Police activities
Parking
Medical institutions
Sewage
Sports facilities (stadiums, sports clubs, etc.)
Environment
Street lighting
Heating
Kindergartens
Universities, technical institutes, colleges
Schools
Cultural premises (concert halls, libraries, etc.)
Transportation infrastructure/Public transport
Street markets and trade premises
Water supply
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
105. 105
Severodonetsk
In your opinion, which areas should be a top priority for your municipal
authorities?
(No more than three responses)
March 2018 June 2018 September 2018
Housing and communal services 32% 39% 46%
Industrial areas/Industrial development 27% 38% 42%
Roads 59% 61% 39%
Social assistance 12% 16% 17%
Public parks and gardens 15% 10% 15%
Yards and areas near houses 9% 7% 12%
Sidewalks 15% 12% 8%
Medical institutions 22% 17% 8%
Security 3% 5% 7%
Securing transparency and openness of the municipal authorities 5% 3% 7%
Heating 6% 4% 5%
Trash collection 3% 1% 5%
Citizen participation in the decision-making process 2% 5% 4%
Sport facilities (stadiums, sport clubs, etc.) 2% 2% 3%
Schools 4% 2% 2%
Street lighting 3% 4% 2%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities 2% 2% 2%
Public transportation 3% 5% 2%
Kindergartens 3% 3% 1%
Culture premises 1% 0% 1%
Street markets 1% 1%
Parking 1% 0% 1%
Administrative services provision 2% 1% 0%
Land issues 1% 1% 0%
Sewage 1% 0% 0%
Environment 1% 1% 0%
Water supply 1% 0% 0%
Other 4% 6% 14%
Difficult to answer/No answer 10% 7% 13%
106. 106
Slovyansk
How would you rate the quality of each of the following services
and/or public goods that are available in your city?
<1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
3%
3%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
2%
3%
3%
6%
3%
3%
9%
8%
10%
12%
12%
14%
15%
15%
16%
16%
18%
20%
20%
20%
21%
26%
29%
28%
29%
29%
24%
17%
40%
32%
34%
49%
40%
50%
46%
43%
37%
34%
40%
44%
41%
48%
53%
50%
44%
50%
50%
45%
33%
41%
28%
44%
40%
26%
27%
25%
30%
21%
36%
33%
17%
23%
20%
23%
9%
20%
20%
7%
6%
15%
26%
36%
9%
14%
11%
8%
9%
8%
5%
6%
9%
14%
4%
7%
7%
5%
2%
2%
4%
1%
1%
3%
13%
2%
13%
1%
5%
4%
12%
2%
3%
13%
1%
1%
18%
5%
10%
1%
12%
<1%
1%
10%
12%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities
Industrial development
Parking
Water supply
Environment
Yards and areas near buildings
Heating
Public parks and gardens
Medical institutions
Sports facilities (stadiums, sports clubs, etc.)
Street lighting
Roads
Cultural premises (concert halls, libraries, etc.)
Sewage
Police activities
Sidewalks
Universities, technical institutes, colleges
Trash collection
Transportation infrastructure/Public transport
Schools
Kindergartens
Street markets and trade premises
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible Difficult to answer/No answer
107. 107
Slovyansk
In your opinion, which areas should be a top priority for your municipal
authorities?
(No more than three responses)
March 2018 June 2018 September 2018
Housing and communal services 23% 38% 39%
Industrial areas/Industrial development 17% 23% 31%
Social assistance 13% 16% 28%
Medical institutions 24% 36% 24%
Water supply 16% 13% 21%
Roads 55% 37% 21%
Street lighting 11% 10% 12%
Environment 4% 10% 8%
Public transportation 8% 8% 7%
Securing transparency and openness of the municipal authorities 6% 9% 6%
Security 8% 6% 6%
Heating 5% 6% 6%
Sewage 6% 6% 6%
Administrative services provision 3% 4% 6%
Citizen participation in the decision-making process 4% 5% 6%
Public parks and gardens 7% 8% 6%
Trash collection 5% 5% 5%
Schools 7% 7% 5%
Accessibility for persons with disabilities 4% 6% 4%
Kindergartens 7% 6% 3%
Yards and areas near houses 5% 5% 3%
Sidewalks 13% 6% 3%
Sport facilities (stadiums, sport clubs, etc.) 5% 3% 3%
Cultural premises 4% 2% 2%
Land issues 2% 2% 2%
Street markets 1% 2% 2%
Parking 2% 2% 2%
Other 2% 2% 7%
Difficult to answer/No answer 2% 2% 1%
109. 109
43%
57%
33%
24%
43%
2%
17%
37%
40%
3%
49%
37%
12%
1%
1%
24%
<1%
12%
3%
29%
5%
11%
4%
2%
10%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
Kherson
Demographics
110. 110
8%
64%
28%
<1%
92%
6%
1%
0%
49%
12%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
6%
26%
1%
6%
99%
1%
<1%
<1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Difficult to answer/No answer
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENATHOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMBERSHIP
Kherson
Demographics
111. 111
10%
29%
46%
12%
1%
<1%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow money for
buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes, but we
need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a good suit, a mobile
phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other purchases, but we
need to save or borrow money for purchasing more expensive things (e.g.,
appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive purchases, but
we need to save or borrow money for purchases like a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Kherson
Demographics
112. 112
45%
55%
37%
27%
36%
2%
11%
39%
45%
4%
40%
36%
18%
3%
4%
20%
1%
15%
5%
19%
9%
5%
7%
7%
11%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
Rivne
Demographics
113. 113
89%
2%
8%
1%
95%
2%
1%
1%
56%
19%
1%
1%
3%
<1%
2%
12%
2%
4%
95%
1%
2%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Difficult to answer/No answer
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENATHOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMBERSHIP
Rivne
Demographics
114. 114
9%
22%
41%
21%
4%
<1%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money for buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes, but
we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a good suit,
a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other purchases,
but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing more expensive
things (e.g., appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like a
car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Rivne
Demographics
115. 115
45%
55%
25%
25%
49%
2%
18%
40%
40%
<1%
52%
33%
12%
<1%
3%
16%
<1%
11%
7%
36%
6%
6%
4%
5%
6%
3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
Severodonetsk
Demographics
116. 116
4%
83%
13%
<1%
66%
33%
2%
<1%
7%
52%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
12%
28%
<1%
1%
97%
2%
1%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Difficult to answer/No answer
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENATHOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMBERSHIP
Severodonetsk
Demographics
117. 117
18%
39%
37%
5%
<1%
<1%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money for buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes,
but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a
good suit, a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing
more expensive things (e.g., appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like
a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Severodonetsk
Demographics
118. 118
45%
55%
24%
28%
48%
7%
17%
41%
32%
3%
49%
31%
16%
2%
2%
25%
<1%
13%
3%
33%
4%
7%
5%
4%
5%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Males
Females
18-35
36-50
51+
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Dificult to answer/No answer
I do not work
Private
State
Public, nongovernmental
Dificult to answer/No answer
Worker
Farmer/Peasant
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Self-employed/Entrepreneur
Other
Dificult to answer/No answer
GENDERAGEEDUCATION
SECTOROF
EMPLOYMENTOCCUPATION
Slovyansk
Demographics
119. 119
6%
65%
27%
<1%
75%
22%
3%
1%
10%
35%
<1%
<1%
1%
<1%
1%
8%
38%
3%
4%
96%
1%
1%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Ukrainian
Russian
Both, Ukrainian and Russian equally
Difficult to answer/No answer
Ukrainian
Russian
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
Orthodox UPC KP (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox UPC MP (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Catholic
Protestant
Judaism
Muslim
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer/No answer
None
Member of a political party
Member of an NGO
Difficult to answer/No answer
LANGUAGE
SPOKENATHOMENATIONALITYRELIGION
PARTIES,NGOs
MEMEBERSHIP
Slovyansk
Demographics
120. 120
25%
33%
28%
11%
2%
<1%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money for buying clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes,
but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a
good suit, a mobile phone, or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes, and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchasing
more expensive things (e.g., appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes, and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like
a car or an apartment
I can buy anything at any time
Difficult to answer/No answer
FINANCIALSTATUS
Slovyansk
Demographics