The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
To fill existing gaps in the humanitarian information management system, primarily caused by accessibility and security issues, REACH developed the Area of Knowledge methodology. Every month the humanitarian need for different sectors was assessed in 7 out of 10 states. The information was presented in a factsheet ideated by Marco Pizzolato in November 2016.
Data from the second wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine about options for humanitarian and trade relations between Ukraine and uncontrolled territories in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were most supportive of maintaining humanitarian relations like allowing movement of people and payment of pensions, while implementing an economic blockade.
- There was support for allowing trade in essential goods from Ukraine to the uncontrolled territories.
- If Ukraine regains control of the territories, respondents favored locally elected authorities over authorities appointed by Kyiv, and allowing local input in appointing police and judicial positions.
- Healthcare and education workers in the territories would generally be allowed to keep their jobs under Ukrainian control.
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, May 26-June 10, 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from May 26 to June 10, 2018 through face-to-face interviews with 2,400 permanent Ukrainian residents aged 18 and older. The majority of respondents believe things in Ukraine are going in the wrong direction and that the economic situation has worsened over the past year. Most plan to vote in the upcoming 2019 parliamentary elections, with the Servant of the People party being the most popular choice.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, November 2015DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine between November 19-30, 2015. It provides details on the methodology, including that 1,800 residents nationwide and 1,284 residents of the Donbas region were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found high levels of pessimism, with most believing things are going in the wrong direction for Ukraine. Approval ratings for the president, prime minister and parliament were low. Economic assessments were also negative, with most saying the national and household economic situations had stayed the same or worsened over the past year.
This annual survey provides an extensivelook at citizen attitudes about local governance and municipal services.
Report link - http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2018-3-22_ukraine_poll.pdf
To fill existing gaps in the humanitarian information management system, primarily caused by accessibility and security issues, REACH developed the Area of Knowledge methodology. Every month the humanitarian need for different sectors was assessed in 7 out of 10 states. The information was presented in a factsheet ideated by Marco Pizzolato in November 2016.
Data from the second wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine about options for humanitarian and trade relations between Ukraine and uncontrolled territories in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were most supportive of maintaining humanitarian relations like allowing movement of people and payment of pensions, while implementing an economic blockade.
- There was support for allowing trade in essential goods from Ukraine to the uncontrolled territories.
- If Ukraine regains control of the territories, respondents favored locally elected authorities over authorities appointed by Kyiv, and allowing local input in appointing police and judicial positions.
- Healthcare and education workers in the territories would generally be allowed to keep their jobs under Ukrainian control.
Ukrainian Municipal Survey, 20 January – 8 February, 2016Dmytro Lysiuk
Ukrainian Municipal Survey
20 January – 8 February, 2016
This annual survey provides an unprecedented
window into citizen attitudes about local governance
and municipal services.
Methodology 5
Concern About Corruption and Nepotism 6
Moods and Attitudes 18
Commitment to Move Ukraine towards the West 26
Approval of and Satisfaction with Officials and Institutions 32
Assessment of the Quality of Public Goods and Services 52
Citizen Participation in Local Governance 81
Municipal Authorities’ Performance 95
Interaction with Local Authorities 108
Accessibility of Information on City Authorities and Institutions 113
Electoral Moods 124
Local or National Responsibility 132
Demographics 146
Survey of Ukrainian Public Opinion: May, 2013Igor Tyshchenko
This document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from May 14-28, 2013. Over 1,200 Ukrainian residents were interviewed face-to-face. The survey found that most respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and their financial situation has worsened over the past year. Unemployment, corruption, and low industry production were identified as the most important issues facing Ukraine. A plurality support Ukraine joining the European Union over a trade union with Russia.
Assessment of the situation in the donbas minsk agreementsUIFuture
This document summarizes the results of a socio-political survey regarding the situation in the Donbas region of Ukraine and the Minsk agreements. Key findings include:
- Only 11.4% of respondents were familiar with the content of the Minsk agreements, while 60.3% had superficial knowledge.
- Support for Ukraine adhering to the Minsk agreements decreased from 54.9% to 42.3% compared to a previous survey.
- Respondents were pessimistic about resolving the Donbas conflict, with 37.5% believing it would be frozen for a decade.
- There was no clear consensus on how to solve the problem of occupied Donbas territories.
Objective: to identify the attitude of citizens of Ukraine to the socio-political and economic situation in the country, to determine the electoral preferences and level of confidence towards the civil and public institutions, as well as to form an estimate of judgments of the situation in the Donbas, e-declaration and other high-profile events
This report is the fourth round of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the non-governmentcontrolled area (NGCA) administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of rights of the conflict-affected population within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore reasons and concerns of those travelling between the NGCA and the government-controlled area (GCA), as well as the conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through EECPs. The information collected in the survey helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts.
This report is based on data collected during December 2017 – January 2018, which is characterized by the holidays and deteriorating winter weather conditions.
Data from the first wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were more likely to expect dialogue and negotiations rather than intensification of military operations to resolve the conflict within the year.
- A majority saw continued military activities by self-proclaimed separatist groups as worsening the problem, while international negotiations and sanctions on Russia were viewed as potentially helping to solve it.
- Payment of pensions in non-government controlled areas and introducing a federal system of governance in Ukraine had mixed views, while elections in separatist areas before control and separation from Ukraine were largely unacceptable.
FUTURE AND THE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PROFILE EVENTSUIFuture
In anticipation of 2017 respondents pondered over events that might happen next year. 37.2% don't expect any fundamental changes, but 23.9% believe that next year early parliamentary elections will be held, and 17.2% think that there will be early presidential election, whereas 7.6% predict a violent overthrow of Poroshenko. One in ten anticipates that in 2017 Russia will begin a new military advance in Ukraine. Comfortingly, there is a part of the respondents optimistic about the next year: 21.6% expect the emergence of new political leaders who will change the country for the better, and 12.1% expect that there will be stabilization and economic growth in Ukraine.
Public Opinion Survey: Residents of MoldovamResearcher
The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center
for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting.
This report summarizes the results of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints between government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas of Ukraine in April 2018. Some key findings:
- The majority (57%) of respondents were elderly traveling to obtain pensions or benefits, with most (94.8%) originally from the non-government area.
- Reasons for travel differed by destination, with visits to relatives and property checks common reasons for traveling to the non-government area, while avoiding benefits suspension and document issues motivated trips to the government area.
- Concerns about long lines increased at some checkpoints as weather improved, though concerns about poor infrastructure decreased accordingly. The lack of seating and shelter while
In mind internews_ media_report_2014 english editIrina Negreyeva
Internews presents the Media Audience Survey held in Ukraine in spring-summer 2014. The survey explores the Ukrainians' media consumption in ten regions of Ukraine and exemines their awareness about media ownership, paid journalism and Ukraine's switch to the digital broadcasting.
Tunisie sondage : Une économie en manque de performance et la corruption cont...Jamaity
Tunis, Tunisie— Un nouveau sondage réalisé par le centre de l’Institut Républicain International (IRI) pour les sondages révèle que les mauvaises conditions économiques et la corruption continuent de susciter une grande insatisfaction publique en Tunisie.
« Ce sondage renforce une nécessité vitale de résoudre les problèmes les plus préoccupants des tunisiens : la corruption et l’économie, » déclare Scott Mastic, Directeur Régional pour l’Afrique du Nord et le Moyen Orient. » Nos résultats renforcent le besoin de faire face à la corruption aux niveaux local et national, et espérons que le gouvernement intègre cette approche dans sa ‘guerre contre la corruption’ lancée tout récemment »
Un total de 87% des tunisiens décrivent la situation économique comme mauvaise (26%) ou très mauvaise (61%). (44%) disent que le chômage est le plus grand problème auquel fait face le pays, suivi de l’économie et la crise financière à 24%. Une majorité claire de répondants (72%) pense que la lutte contre la corruption est le meilleur moyen pour améliorer l’économie de leurs communautés, suivi de 59% qui disent que les collectivités locales vont « rendre plus facile de lancer des entreprises pour les entrepreneurs »
La corruption continue d’être une préoccupation majeure, avec 89% de tunisiens qui affirment que la corruption est plus élevée aujourd’hui qu’avant la révolution démocratique de 2011. 46% pensent que les relations personnelles (wasta) mèneraient le « plus probablement » vers la richesse en Tunisie. Particulièrement, pour la deuxième fois dans l’histoire des sondages en Tunisie, les répondants ont mis les hôpitaux en tête des institutions où ils auraient fait face à la corruption (17%).
Le sondage indique aussi in déclin de l’intérêt à la participation au processus électoral. 50% des répondants disent qu’ils sont « peu » (9%) ou « très peu » (41%) enclins à aller voter aux élections municipales-une augmentation de 7 point par rapport à avril 2017. En outre, 83% ne savent pas ou refusent de dire à quels partis ils voteraient si les élections allaient être organisées demain.
Méthodologie
Ce sondage a été mené pour le compte du Centre de l’Institut Républicain International (IRI) pour les sondages par la société tunisienne, ELKA Consulting sous la supervision de Chesapeake Beach Consulting. Les questions avaient focalisé en premier sur l’économie afin de fournir aux différentes parties prenantes des données et de permettre aussi de leur indiquer les priorités publiques.
Les données ont été collectées du 11 au 17 Août 2017 moyennant des interviews en face à face. Un échantillon national de 1226 Tunisiens âgés de 18 ans et plus. Un sur-échantillonnage a été effectué dans trois régions connaissant des difficultés économiques. La marge d’erreur étant de plus ou moins 2, 85% au milieu de gamme de niveau de confiance de 95%. Les chiffres indiqués dans les graphs et des tableaux peuvent ne pas faire la somme de 100% en raison de l’arrondissement.
Presented to the Franklin (MA) School Committee at the meeting of Feb 25, 2020. One piece (albeit a key one) of the puzzle before the school district to resolve. Next piece (facilities capacity analysis) due to be added to the discussion in April, 2020. Plenty of time to digest these numbers in the meantime.
Press statement (english) Ipsos Tanzania september 2015Ipsos
The survey sampled over 1,800 Tanzanians between September 5-22nd, 2015. It found that while twice as many Tanzanians identify as CCM supporters compared to the opposition party Chadema, a substantial minority do not support any party. At the time of the survey, the CCM candidate Magufuli led his main opponent Lowassa 62% to 31%, but many respondents were undecided or unwilling to state their choice. While Magufuli led across demographics, he had a stronger appeal among women, rural dwellers, and older people compared to men, urbanites, and younger Tanzanians.
The document provides an overview of demographic, economic, and quality of life trends in the Gauteng City-Region (GCR) based on census and survey data. Some key points:
1. The population of Gauteng province has grown rapidly, increasing by over 2.9 million between 2001-2011 to a total of 12.3 million people, which represents 23.7% of South Africa's total population.
2. Gauteng contributes disproportionately to South Africa's economy, representing 36% of national GDP while only comprising 2% of the country's total land area. However, unemployment in Gauteng remains the highest among OECD metro-regions.
3. Access to basic
This summary is based on results from Ipsos’ 1st Quarter SPEC survey of 2015 that was conducted between March 28 and April 7. It is the 9th such release. Given that the tragic attack on Garissa University College occurred on April 2, about 25% of the interviews took place after that date. However, in comparing the results obtained before and after April 2, their distribution was clearly affected more on some issues than others, or not at all. For example, the proportion of those perceiving al-Shabaab as “very much a threat” after April 2 was 14% higher than before that date. By contrast the results presented here (on issues unrelated to security, presidential approval, etc.) were not affected by that tragic attack.
Ke ipsos spec_poll_press_release_presentation_3rd_september_2015The Star Newspaper
This document provides the methodology and results of a survey conducted in Kenya between July 30th and August 9th, 2015. A random sample of 2,002 Kenyan adults were interviewed face-to-face. The survey covered topics like crime victimization, views on al-Shabaab and the deployment of the Kenyan Defense Forces in Somalia. It also includes demographic information about the respondents and trends from previous surveys. Strict quality control measures were employed to verify the data collection process.
Presentation at the WomenPower Fair organized by the Cyprus Interaction Lab of the Department of Multimedia and Graphic Arts of the Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol CYPRUS
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Ukraine National Municipal Survey, March 2015 by IRIIlya Ponomarev
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 22 regional capitals of Ukraine between March 2-20, 2015. Some key findings:
- 68% see corruption as a significant problem in their city
- 60% see nepotism as a significant problem
- 57% think Ukraine should join the EU if it could only join one economic union
- 47% would vote for Ukraine to join NATO if a referendum were held
- 35% think their city authorities are making efforts to reduce corruption at the municipal level
The survey involved over 17,000 respondents and provides insights into citizen attitudes about local governance, services, and reforms in Ukraine.
Звіт Міжнародного республіканського інституту США щодо ситуації в УкраїніmResearcher
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from November 15 to December 14, 2017. It provides details on:
- The national sample of 2,400 residents surveyed throughout Ukraine, excluding occupied territories.
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 residents each in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The multi-stage probability sampling method used to select respondents randomly from cities and villages proportionally.
- Response rates ranged from 58% to 76.2% and margins of error were below 2.8% for city samples and 1.7% for the national sample.
Municipal survey_May 2023_ENG - FINAL.pdfRatinggroup
The document summarizes the results of the eighth annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey conducted in April-May 2023. It was administered in 21 regional capitals not under Russian control, to a sample of 16,800 respondents. Key findings include:
- Over half of respondents believe things in their city are going in the right direction, though this varies between 39-82% across cities.
- Most respondents said their household's economic situation stayed the same (34-45%) or worsened (27-43%) over the past year.
- Respondents were cautiously optimistic about Ukraine's economic prospects, with most expecting the situation to improve (25-38%) or stay the same (22-36%) in the next
Assessment of the situation in the donbas minsk agreementsUIFuture
This document summarizes the results of a socio-political survey regarding the situation in the Donbas region of Ukraine and the Minsk agreements. Key findings include:
- Only 11.4% of respondents were familiar with the content of the Minsk agreements, while 60.3% had superficial knowledge.
- Support for Ukraine adhering to the Minsk agreements decreased from 54.9% to 42.3% compared to a previous survey.
- Respondents were pessimistic about resolving the Donbas conflict, with 37.5% believing it would be frozen for a decade.
- There was no clear consensus on how to solve the problem of occupied Donbas territories.
Objective: to identify the attitude of citizens of Ukraine to the socio-political and economic situation in the country, to determine the electoral preferences and level of confidence towards the civil and public institutions, as well as to form an estimate of judgments of the situation in the Donbas, e-declaration and other high-profile events
This report is the fourth round of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the non-governmentcontrolled area (NGCA) administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of rights of the conflict-affected population within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore reasons and concerns of those travelling between the NGCA and the government-controlled area (GCA), as well as the conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through EECPs. The information collected in the survey helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts.
This report is based on data collected during December 2017 – January 2018, which is characterized by the holidays and deteriorating winter weather conditions.
Data from the first wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were more likely to expect dialogue and negotiations rather than intensification of military operations to resolve the conflict within the year.
- A majority saw continued military activities by self-proclaimed separatist groups as worsening the problem, while international negotiations and sanctions on Russia were viewed as potentially helping to solve it.
- Payment of pensions in non-government controlled areas and introducing a federal system of governance in Ukraine had mixed views, while elections in separatist areas before control and separation from Ukraine were largely unacceptable.
FUTURE AND THE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PROFILE EVENTSUIFuture
In anticipation of 2017 respondents pondered over events that might happen next year. 37.2% don't expect any fundamental changes, but 23.9% believe that next year early parliamentary elections will be held, and 17.2% think that there will be early presidential election, whereas 7.6% predict a violent overthrow of Poroshenko. One in ten anticipates that in 2017 Russia will begin a new military advance in Ukraine. Comfortingly, there is a part of the respondents optimistic about the next year: 21.6% expect the emergence of new political leaders who will change the country for the better, and 12.1% expect that there will be stabilization and economic growth in Ukraine.
Public Opinion Survey: Residents of MoldovamResearcher
The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center
for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting.
This report summarizes the results of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints between government-controlled and non-government-controlled areas of Ukraine in April 2018. Some key findings:
- The majority (57%) of respondents were elderly traveling to obtain pensions or benefits, with most (94.8%) originally from the non-government area.
- Reasons for travel differed by destination, with visits to relatives and property checks common reasons for traveling to the non-government area, while avoiding benefits suspension and document issues motivated trips to the government area.
- Concerns about long lines increased at some checkpoints as weather improved, though concerns about poor infrastructure decreased accordingly. The lack of seating and shelter while
In mind internews_ media_report_2014 english editIrina Negreyeva
Internews presents the Media Audience Survey held in Ukraine in spring-summer 2014. The survey explores the Ukrainians' media consumption in ten regions of Ukraine and exemines their awareness about media ownership, paid journalism and Ukraine's switch to the digital broadcasting.
Tunisie sondage : Une économie en manque de performance et la corruption cont...Jamaity
Tunis, Tunisie— Un nouveau sondage réalisé par le centre de l’Institut Républicain International (IRI) pour les sondages révèle que les mauvaises conditions économiques et la corruption continuent de susciter une grande insatisfaction publique en Tunisie.
« Ce sondage renforce une nécessité vitale de résoudre les problèmes les plus préoccupants des tunisiens : la corruption et l’économie, » déclare Scott Mastic, Directeur Régional pour l’Afrique du Nord et le Moyen Orient. » Nos résultats renforcent le besoin de faire face à la corruption aux niveaux local et national, et espérons que le gouvernement intègre cette approche dans sa ‘guerre contre la corruption’ lancée tout récemment »
Un total de 87% des tunisiens décrivent la situation économique comme mauvaise (26%) ou très mauvaise (61%). (44%) disent que le chômage est le plus grand problème auquel fait face le pays, suivi de l’économie et la crise financière à 24%. Une majorité claire de répondants (72%) pense que la lutte contre la corruption est le meilleur moyen pour améliorer l’économie de leurs communautés, suivi de 59% qui disent que les collectivités locales vont « rendre plus facile de lancer des entreprises pour les entrepreneurs »
La corruption continue d’être une préoccupation majeure, avec 89% de tunisiens qui affirment que la corruption est plus élevée aujourd’hui qu’avant la révolution démocratique de 2011. 46% pensent que les relations personnelles (wasta) mèneraient le « plus probablement » vers la richesse en Tunisie. Particulièrement, pour la deuxième fois dans l’histoire des sondages en Tunisie, les répondants ont mis les hôpitaux en tête des institutions où ils auraient fait face à la corruption (17%).
Le sondage indique aussi in déclin de l’intérêt à la participation au processus électoral. 50% des répondants disent qu’ils sont « peu » (9%) ou « très peu » (41%) enclins à aller voter aux élections municipales-une augmentation de 7 point par rapport à avril 2017. En outre, 83% ne savent pas ou refusent de dire à quels partis ils voteraient si les élections allaient être organisées demain.
Méthodologie
Ce sondage a été mené pour le compte du Centre de l’Institut Républicain International (IRI) pour les sondages par la société tunisienne, ELKA Consulting sous la supervision de Chesapeake Beach Consulting. Les questions avaient focalisé en premier sur l’économie afin de fournir aux différentes parties prenantes des données et de permettre aussi de leur indiquer les priorités publiques.
Les données ont été collectées du 11 au 17 Août 2017 moyennant des interviews en face à face. Un échantillon national de 1226 Tunisiens âgés de 18 ans et plus. Un sur-échantillonnage a été effectué dans trois régions connaissant des difficultés économiques. La marge d’erreur étant de plus ou moins 2, 85% au milieu de gamme de niveau de confiance de 95%. Les chiffres indiqués dans les graphs et des tableaux peuvent ne pas faire la somme de 100% en raison de l’arrondissement.
Presented to the Franklin (MA) School Committee at the meeting of Feb 25, 2020. One piece (albeit a key one) of the puzzle before the school district to resolve. Next piece (facilities capacity analysis) due to be added to the discussion in April, 2020. Plenty of time to digest these numbers in the meantime.
Press statement (english) Ipsos Tanzania september 2015Ipsos
The survey sampled over 1,800 Tanzanians between September 5-22nd, 2015. It found that while twice as many Tanzanians identify as CCM supporters compared to the opposition party Chadema, a substantial minority do not support any party. At the time of the survey, the CCM candidate Magufuli led his main opponent Lowassa 62% to 31%, but many respondents were undecided or unwilling to state their choice. While Magufuli led across demographics, he had a stronger appeal among women, rural dwellers, and older people compared to men, urbanites, and younger Tanzanians.
The document provides an overview of demographic, economic, and quality of life trends in the Gauteng City-Region (GCR) based on census and survey data. Some key points:
1. The population of Gauteng province has grown rapidly, increasing by over 2.9 million between 2001-2011 to a total of 12.3 million people, which represents 23.7% of South Africa's total population.
2. Gauteng contributes disproportionately to South Africa's economy, representing 36% of national GDP while only comprising 2% of the country's total land area. However, unemployment in Gauteng remains the highest among OECD metro-regions.
3. Access to basic
This summary is based on results from Ipsos’ 1st Quarter SPEC survey of 2015 that was conducted between March 28 and April 7. It is the 9th such release. Given that the tragic attack on Garissa University College occurred on April 2, about 25% of the interviews took place after that date. However, in comparing the results obtained before and after April 2, their distribution was clearly affected more on some issues than others, or not at all. For example, the proportion of those perceiving al-Shabaab as “very much a threat” after April 2 was 14% higher than before that date. By contrast the results presented here (on issues unrelated to security, presidential approval, etc.) were not affected by that tragic attack.
Ke ipsos spec_poll_press_release_presentation_3rd_september_2015The Star Newspaper
This document provides the methodology and results of a survey conducted in Kenya between July 30th and August 9th, 2015. A random sample of 2,002 Kenyan adults were interviewed face-to-face. The survey covered topics like crime victimization, views on al-Shabaab and the deployment of the Kenyan Defense Forces in Somalia. It also includes demographic information about the respondents and trends from previous surveys. Strict quality control measures were employed to verify the data collection process.
Presentation at the WomenPower Fair organized by the Cyprus Interaction Lab of the Department of Multimedia and Graphic Arts of the Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol CYPRUS
This document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from June 9 to July 7, 2017. It describes the following key elements:
- A national sample of 2,400 respondents was collected through in-person interviews across Ukraine (excluding occupied territories).
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 respondents each were collected in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The sampling methodology used a multi-stage probability sample to select respondents randomly from regions, settlements, and households while ensuring national representation.
New Ukraine poll reveals increased concern over military conflict in Donbas, ...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine conducted from May 26 to June 10, 2018. Some key findings:
- 34% of respondents think things in Ukraine are going in the right direction, while 48% think they are going in the wrong direction.
- 37% of respondents think the economic situation in Ukraine has improved over the last 12 months, while 31% think it has worsened.
- 32% of respondents definitely intend to vote in the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2019, while 36% somewhat intend to vote.
- 19% of likely voters would vote for the Servant of the People party if elections were held next Sunday. The second most popular
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, September 29 - October 14, 2018DonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from September 29 to October 14, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 51% said wrong direction and 34% said right direction.
- Regarding the economy, 37% said it had worsened in the last year, 31% said it stayed the same, and 27% said it improved.
- 34% definitely intend to vote in the upcoming presidential election in March 2019, while 18% do not intend to vote.
Political Disaffection Rife Among Young People Ahead of 2019 ElectionsDonbassFullAccess
- The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from March 15-31, 2018 and included 2,400 respondents. It assessed public opinion on the direction of the country, economic conditions, electoral intentions, and approval of political leaders.
- When asked if things in Ukraine are going in the right or wrong direction, 64% said wrong direction and 13% said right direction. Economic assessments were also predominantly negative.
- Looking ahead to the 2019 parliamentary elections, 37% said they definitely intend to vote while 26% said somewhat. The Servant of the People party was most popular among likely voters at 21%.
- Approval ratings for President Petro Poroshenko remained low, with 33% expressing strong or some approval and 45
Ukraine National Municipal Survey, March 2015 by IRIIlya Ponomarev
This document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in 22 regional capitals of Ukraine between March 2-20, 2015. Some key findings:
- 68% see corruption as a significant problem in their city
- 60% see nepotism as a significant problem
- 57% think Ukraine should join the EU if it could only join one economic union
- 47% would vote for Ukraine to join NATO if a referendum were held
- 35% think their city authorities are making efforts to reduce corruption at the municipal level
The survey involved over 17,000 respondents and provides insights into citizen attitudes about local governance, services, and reforms in Ukraine.
Звіт Міжнародного республіканського інституту США щодо ситуації в УкраїніmResearcher
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted from November 15 to December 14, 2017. It provides details on:
- The national sample of 2,400 residents surveyed throughout Ukraine, excluding occupied territories.
- Additional oversamples of 1,200 residents each in the cities of Dnipro, Khmelnytskyi, Mariupol and Mykolaiv.
- The multi-stage probability sampling method used to select respondents randomly from cities and villages proportionally.
- Response rates ranged from 58% to 76.2% and margins of error were below 2.8% for city samples and 1.7% for the national sample.
Municipal survey_May 2023_ENG - FINAL.pdfRatinggroup
The document summarizes the results of the eighth annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey conducted in April-May 2023. It was administered in 21 regional capitals not under Russian control, to a sample of 16,800 respondents. Key findings include:
- Over half of respondents believe things in their city are going in the right direction, though this varies between 39-82% across cities.
- Most respondents said their household's economic situation stayed the same (34-45%) or worsened (27-43%) over the past year.
- Respondents were cautiously optimistic about Ukraine's economic prospects, with most expecting the situation to improve (25-38%) or stay the same (22-36%) in the next
Public Opinion PollResidents of KyrgyzstanmResearcher
В исследовании приняли участие 1 483 респондентов в возрасте от 18 лет и старше – граждане, которые уже имеют право голоса на выборах. Отмечается, что выборка была однородной по возрасту, полу и прописке.
Research which clearly shows opinion and attitude differencies between Western+Central and Southern+Eastern Ukraine. There are some questions to
- wording and formulation of questionnaire,
- some methodics of results presentation of this USA-sponsoring research,
but anyway that shows the whole picture
National monitoring system of the situation with internally displaced persons...DonbassFullAccess
This document summarizes the methodology and key findings of a survey on internally displaced persons in Ukraine conducted by the International Organization for Migration with EU funding.
The survey used a sample of 300 territorial units across Ukraine to interview key informants and IDP households. It found that the majority of IDPs are women between 35-59 years old, with the average household size being 2.8 people. Over half of IDPs have a university education. While 28% are fully employed, 20% receive state benefits without working. 53% of households include children.
The survey aims to establish a National Monitoring System to regularly assess the situation of IDPs regarding their location, living conditions, access to services, and intentions to return
The survey was conducted September 12–25, 2014 by Rating Group Ukraine and Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organizationon behalf of the International Republican Institute.
National monitoring system of the situation with internally displaced persons...DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted by IOM in Ukraine to establish a National Monitoring System for internally displaced persons. Key findings include:
1) The survey involved interviews with over 600 IDP households across 24 oblasts of Ukraine to collect data on socioeconomic characteristics, movement intentions, livelihoods, access to services, and assistance needs.
2) Most IDPs are women between 35-39 years old, and the average household size is 2.85 people. Over half of IDP households have children.
3) Living conditions for most IDPs are poor, with 65% having incomes less than 1,330 UAH per month. Their main sources of income are social benefits
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, December 2018DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a public opinion survey of Ukrainian residents conducted between December 13-27, 2018. It provides details on the methodology, including that a representative sample of 2,400 Ukrainians were surveyed through in-person interviews. Key findings include that 32% said they definitely intend to vote in the 2019 presidential election, with Yulia Tymoshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyi emerging as the top choices for president at 16% and 11% respectively. The document also examines potential second round matchups between candidates.
Social and political moods of Ukrainians, december 2018DonbassFullAccess
The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine from December 13-27, 2018 through in-person interviews of 2,400 residents. It found that 32% said they definitely would vote in the 2019 presidential election, while 42% said they somewhat would vote. If the election was held the following Sunday, the top candidates respondents said they would vote for were Yulia Tymoshenko at 16%, Volodymyr Zelenskyi at 11%, and Petro Poroshenko at 9%. The survey also examined potential run-off election matchups between candidates.
This survey summarizes data from the first wave of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the conflict in eastern Ukraine. It provides details on the methodology and demographics of 1975 respondents surveyed by phone from April 14 to May 2, 2018. The summary includes responses to questions about expectations for resolving the conflict, views on potential measures and international initiatives, and levels of acceptability for various arrangements between Ukraine and eastern territories.
The document provides a summary of a survey conducted at five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) along the line of contact in eastern Ukraine in October 2018. Some key findings include:
- The majority (87%) of respondents were residents of the non-government controlled area (NGCA) and crossed primarily to deal with documents/payments or visit relatives.
- Most respondents (58%) spent 4-5 hours crossing, with the longest times at Marinka EECP. Crossing typically took longer on the NGCA side except at Stanytsia Luhanska.
- Reconstruction continued at two EECPs during the reporting period, leading to changes in lines and crossing times.
This report summarizes the results of a survey conducted in October 2018 at five entry-exit checkpoints in eastern Ukraine. The survey explored the motivations and concerns of people traveling between government-controlled and non-government controlled areas of Ukraine. Key findings include:
- The majority (87%) of respondents were residents of non-government controlled areas, with most traveling to solve document or payment issues, visit relatives, or withdraw cash.
- Reconstruction was ongoing at two checkpoints during the reporting period, leading to longer wait times at some locations.
- Over half of respondents spent 4-5 hours crossing checkpoints, with the longest wait times at the Marinka checkpoint.
2014 july 25 public opinion survey residents of moldova, june 7-27, 2014Rasa Alisauskiene
The survey was conducted in Moldova from June 7-27, 2014 with 1,200 respondents through face-to-face interviews. It is representative of Moldova's population by age, gender, education, region and settlement size. The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 percent. Growing support for democracy was found, with satisfaction in democracy increasing and more believing the country is heading in the right direction. However, corruption and economic problems remain top concerns.
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Key findings include:
- A majority of respondents expect dialogue and negotiations to resolve the conflict rather than intensification of military operations.
- Respondents had mixed views on whether various measures like military operations, sanctions, or negotiations would help resolve or worsen the conflict.
- Most respondents viewed direct Russian military intervention or continued activities by separatist groups as likely to worsen the conflict.
- There was no consensus on international initiatives or domestic political arrangements between Ukraine and separatist regions.
Similar to Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017 (20)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
The document analyzes violations of electoral rights that occurred during elections in liberated territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in Ukraine. It describes violations during the 2014 extraordinary presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 2015 local elections, including obstacles to voting, violence against election officials, and criminal interference. The document highlights issues preventing internally displaced persons from exercising their right to vote and proposes solutions like allowing voters to change their voting address without changing their official place of residence, to integrate displaced people into their new communities while preserving electoral rights.
The document provides background information on Popasna, Ukraine and summarizes key events regarding its occupation and liberation during the 2014 conflict. It describes how Popasna came under the control of pro-Russian separatist forces in May 2014 but was liberated by Ukrainian troops on July 22, 2014. However, Popasna remained strategically important and faced repeated artillery attacks from separatists using Grads and other rocket launchers throughout the remainder of 2014, resulting in civilian casualties and property damage. The document lists numerous specific dates of artillery attacks on the city during this period.
The town of Mariinka has been at the center of conflict in eastern Ukraine since 2014. It has been repeatedly shelled by Russian-led forces, leading to numerous civilian casualties and widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure. Although a ceasefire was agreed to in Minsk, the shelling of Mariinka has continued on a near daily basis. As a result, many residents have been forced to evacuate while others live in difficult conditions, lacking basic services. Over four years of conflict, 41 residents have been killed according to official data. The constant shelling of civilian areas like Mariinka may constitute war crimes under international law.
Digest by Ukrainian Helsinki Human rights Union, April 2019DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the activities of the USAID Human Rights in Action Program implemented by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union in April 2019. It discusses the program's work on human rights monitoring, advocacy, strategic litigation, free legal aid provision, and human rights education. Key events covered include Russia simplifying citizenship for eastern Ukrainians, and the PACE keeping sanctions on Russia in place.
Generative Classifiers: Classifying with Bayesian decision theory, Bayes’ rule, Naïve Bayes classifier.
Discriminative Classifiers: Logistic Regression, Decision Trees: Training and Visualizing a Decision Tree, Making Predictions, Estimating Class Probabilities, The CART Training Algorithm, Attribute selection measures- Gini impurity; Entropy, Regularization Hyperparameters, Regression Trees, Linear Support vector machines.
2. Methodology
2
• The survey was conducted by Rating Group Ukraine on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research.
• The survey was conducted throughout Ukraine (except for the occupied territories of Crimea and the Donbas) from
April 21 to May 5, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes.
• The sample consisted of 2,400 permanent residents of Ukraine aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. It is
representative of the general population by gender, age, region and the size of settlement. An additional 1,378
respondents were also surveyed in the Ukrainian-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. A multi-stage
probability sampling method was used with the random route and next birthday methods for respondent selection.
• Stage One: The territory of Ukraine was split into 25 administrative regions (24 regions of Ukraine and
Kyiv). The survey was conducted throughout all regions of Ukraine, with the exception of the occupied
territories of Crimea and the Donbas.
• Stage Two: The selection of settlements was based on towns and villages. Towns were grouped into
subtypes according to their size:
• Cities with a population of more than 1 million
• Cities with a population of between 500,000 and 999,000
• Cities with a population of between 100,000 and 499,000
• Cities with a population of between 50,000 and 99,000
• Cities with a population of up to 50,000
• Villages
• Cities and villages were selected at random. The number of selected cities/villages in each region was
proportional to the share of the population living in cities/villages of a certain type in each region.
• Stage Three: primary sampling points (PSP) were described.
• The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2 percent.
• The average response rate was 64.2 percent.
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
• The survey was funded by the Government of Canada.
3. Methodology
3
Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts Oversample
• An oversample was conducted in the Ukrainian-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts from from April 21 to
May 5, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at respondents’ homes.
• The sample consisted of 1,378 citizens of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts aged 18 and older and eligible to vote. The sample is
representative in terms of gender, age, and size of settlement. A multi-stage probability sampling method was used with
the random route and next birthday methods for respondent selection.
• Stage One: The sample was proportionally split between Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, in the areas controlled
by the Government of Ukraine.
• Stage Two: The selection of settlements was based on towns and villages. Towns were grouped into subtypes
according to their size:
• Cities with population of more than 1 million
• Cities with population of between 500,000 and 999,000
• Cities with population of between 100,000 and 499,000
• Cities with population of between 50,000 and 99,000
• Cities with population of up to 50,000
• Villages
• Settlements were selected at random. The number of selected settlements in each region was proportional to the
share of the population living in a particular type of settlement in each region.
• Stage Three: primary sampling points (PSP) were described.
• The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.6 percent.
• The average response rate was 67.3 percent.
• Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
4. 4
Geographical Key
*Due to the Russian occupation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, residents of Crimea
and the separatist-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts were not included in this poll.
Donbas
Region
8. As far as you know, how has the GDP of Ukraine changed over the
last 12 months?
7%
19%
38%
36%
It has grown
It hasn’t changed
It has decreased
Difficult to answer
8
10. Over the last 6 months, how has the economic situation of your
household changed?
4%
28%
34%
32%
2%
Improved a lot
Improved somewhat
Stayed the same
Worsened somewhat
Worsened a lot
Difficult to answer
<1%
10
12. 12
Do you think it is acceptable for groups of people to use each of
the following methods of protests?
4%
4%
5%
6%
10%
13%
27%
28%
35%
52%
7%
9%
8%
13%
20%
23%
34%
36%
39%
34%
22%
24%
23%
23%
31%
32%
16%
13%
10%
5%
58%
55%
55%
50%
29%
23%
13%
15%
9%
6%
9%
8%
8%
8%
10%
9%
9%
8%
6%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Blocking airports
Occupation of buildings or
enterprises
Blocking railway lines
Blocking major roads
Strikes without permission
Demonstrations without
permission
Boycott
Legal strikes
Legal demonstrations
Collecting signatures for
petitions, letters
Fully acceptable More acceptable than not More unacceptable than acceptable
Not at all acceptable Difficult to answer
14. Who bears primary responsibility for today’s situation in Ukraine?
14
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
4%
9%
14%
22%
39%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer
Other
The local authorities of Ukraine
The West
The people of Ukraine
The Russian Federation
Ukrainian oligarchs
The Parliament of Ukraine
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
The President of Ukraine
18. What is your opinion of each of the following Ukrainian politicians
or members of the Ukrainian government?
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
4%
3%
2%
2%
3%
5%
2%
7%
6%
3%
6%
6%
7%
8%
10%
11%
13%
14%
13%
12%
15%
16%
16%
15%
15%
20%
15%
18%
21%
25%
19%
17%
18%
28%
23%
25%
26%
23%
19%
21%
28%
25%
27%
21%
26%
26%
26%
24%
21%
45%
69%
48%
50%
53%
50%
49%
51%
53%
32%
47%
44%
49%
40%
39%
46%
45%
35%
26%
16%
9%
2%
<1%
3%
2%
2%
5%
12%
1%
2%
8%
<1%
5%
8%
13%
4%
14%
9%
10%
8%
8%
7%
7%
17%
7%
11%
6%
11%
12%
6%
6%
12%
14%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
One of the leaders of the “UKROP” party, Hennadiy Korban
Former Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk
Mayor of Kharkiv Hennadiy Kernes
Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen Avakov
MP Nadia Savchenko
Head of the Parliament Andriy Parubiy
Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko
Leader of the political party “Svoboda,” Oleh Tyahnybok
MP, leader of Opposition Bloc, Yuriy Boyko
Former head of SBU Valentyn Nalyvaychenko
Prime Minister Volodymyr Hroisman
Former Governor of Odesa Oblast, Mikheil Saakashvili
President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko
MP, leader of the political party “Za Zhyttia,” Vadym Rabinovych
Mayor of Kyiv Vitaliy Klitschko
MP, leader of the political party “Fatherland,” Yulia Tymoshenko
MP, leader of Radical Party, Oleh Lyashko
Mayor of Lviv Andriy Sadovyi
Head of the political party “Civic Position,” Anatoliy Hrytsenko
Very favorable Somewhat favorable
Very unfavorable Have not heard the name Difficult to answer
1%
1%
1%
18
24. Did you consume less energy or invest in energy efficiency
measures for your household during this winter?
24
49%
6%
9%
28%
8%
I consumed less energy
I invested in energy efficiency measures
I did not use less energy and did not invest
in energy efficiency
Difficult to answer
*Historically, the Ukrainian government has subsidized the price of utilities for households. In 2016, the International
Monetary Fund required that Ukraine decrease its subsidies, increasing the prices of utilities for families during a period
of ongoing economic hardship.
25. 25
Did your household participate in the state program for “heating
loans” aimed at improving the energy efficiency of your
household?
5%
92%
3%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer
26. 42%
51%
7%
Yes
No
Difficult to answer
26
Have you heard of the state program for “heating loans” aimed at
improving the energy efficiency of your household?
(Respondents who did not participate in the “heating loans” program and those who had difficulty
answering; n=2,289)
28. Do you support the idea of holding early parliamentary elections
in Ukraine?
28
15%
18%
20%
17%
18%
23%
27%
23%
25%
21%
24%
26%
22%
20%
19%
22%
19%
17%
23%
23%
22%
25%
21%
20%
14%
17%
14%
16%
18%
14%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Definitely no Difficult to answer
30. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated, for which party would you
vote?
30
19%
22%
5%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
5%
5%
6%
6%
9%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer
I would not vote
Other
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Left Opposition
Strong Ukraine
People's Front
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
People’s Control
Social Democratic Party
Nash Krai Party
National Movement of D.Yarosh
UKROP
Movement of New Forces
Svoboda
Civic Position
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Radical Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Opposition Bloc
Fatherland Party (Batkivshchyna)
(All respondents)
31. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated, for which party would you
vote? (continued)
31
(Likely voters, n=1,585)
20%
6%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
6%
6%
7%
8%
8%
9%
12%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Difficult to answer
Other
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Left Opposition
People's Front
Strong Ukraine
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
People’s Control
Social Democratic Party
Nash Krai Party
National Movement of D.Yarosh
UKROP
Movement of New Forces
Svoboda
Civic Position
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Radical Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Opposition Bloc
Fatherland Party (Batkivshchyna)
32. 32
(All respondents)
Jul.15 Sep. 15 Nov.15 Feb.16 Jun.16 Sep.16 Apr. 17
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna) 6% 9% 8% 9% 9% 9% 9%
Bloc Petro Poroshenko “Solidarnist” 8% 10% 11% 7% 7% 8% 6%
Opposition Bloc 6% 8% 8% 8% 10% 6% 6%
Radical Party 5% 5% 3% 5% 5% 6% 5%
Self-Reliance (Samopomich) 7% 9% 7% 8% 5% 5% 5%
Civic Position 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% 4% 4%
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia) - - - - - 3% 5%
Svoboda 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3%
Strong Ukraine 1% 1% - 1% - 2% 1%
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia) - 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1%
Movement of New Forces - - - - 2% 1% 2%
UKROP 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1%
Other party 13% 12% 10% 9% 9% 10% 11%
I would not vote 24% 16% 25% 27% 26% 21% 22%
Difficult to answer 20% 19% 17% 16% 19% 18% 19%
If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday and the
following political parties participated, for which party would you
vote? (continued)
33. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, for which other
political party would you vote if the party that you previously
selected did not participate in the elections?
33
34%
24%
3%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
3%
4%
4%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Difficult to answer
I would not vote
Other
People’s Control
Left Opposition
Strong Ukraine
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Democratic Alliance
Justice
UKROP
Right Sector
National Movement of D.Yarosh
Nash Krai Party
People's Front
Social Democratic Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Movement of New Forces
Opposition Bloc
Svoboda
Fatherland Party (Batkivshchyna)
Civic Position
Radical Party
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
(All respondents)
34. If parliamentary elections were held next Sunday, for which other
political party would you vote if the party that you previously
selected did not participate in the elections?
34
(Likely voters, n=1,551)
40%
5%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
4%
4%
4%
5%
5%
6%
6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer
Other
People’s Control
Left Opposition
Agrarian Party of Ukraine
Revival Party (Vidrodzhennia)
Strong Ukraine
Justice
UKROP
Democratic Alliance
National Movement of D.Yarosh
Nash Krai Party
Right Sector
People's Front
Social Democratic Party
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Movement of New Forces
Opposition Bloc
Svoboda
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Civic Position
Radical Party
For Life Party (Za Zhyttia)
Self-Reliance Party (Samopomich)
35. Why would you vote for this party?
35
4%
3%
9%
10%
10%
10%
13%
15%
17%
20%
22%
22%
25%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer
Other
This party understands the problems of my region
Other parties are even worse
This party will secure stability in the country
This party fulfills its promises
This party can restore peace in the country
This party has demonstrated consistent policies
I like their decisiveness
This party defends the interests of people like me
They tell the truth
This party can realize reforms and positive changes in Ukraine
The ideology of this party is very close to mine
The leadership of this party includes people whom I respect
(Respondents who selected a party; n=1,415)
36. 36
When electing a political party, which priority is closest to yours?
51%
17%
32%
The party's priority is Ukraine's membership in
the EU
The party's priority is Ukraine's membership in
the Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and
Kazakhstan
Difficult to answer
37. 37
38%
40%
10%
21%
59%
64%
69%
74%
80%
82%
84%
89%
18%
18%
58%
44%
7%
7%
7%
7%
3%
1%
3%
2%
44%
42%
32%
36%
34%
28%
24%
19%
17%
17%
13%
10%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Would not vote
Undecided
Opposition Bloc
For Life (Za Zhyttia)
UKROP
Radical Party
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Self-Reliance (Samopomich)
Movement of New Forces
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Svoboda
The party's priority is Ukraine's membership in the EU
The party's priority is Ukraine's membership in the Customs Union
Difficult to answer
When electing a political party, which priority is closest to yours?
(continued)
38. 38
When selecting a political party, which priority is closest to
yours? (continued)
53%
19%
28%
The priority of this political party is to deepen
economic cooperation between Ukraine and the
countries of the EU
The priority of this political party is to deepen
economic cooperation between Ukraine and post-
Soviet countries
Difficult to answer
39. 39
40%
42%
11%
23%
64%
66%
72%
75%
80%
80%
84%
90%
19%
19%
62%
46%
9%
9%
9%
9%
4%
4%
3%
2%
42%
39%
27%
31%
27%
25%
19%
17%
17%
16%
13%
8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Would not vote
Undecided
Opposition Bloc
For Life (Za Zhyttia)
UKROP
Radical Party
Civic Position
Fatherland (Batkivshchyna)
Self-Reliance (Samopomich)
Movement of New Forces
Bloc Petro Poroshenko "Solidarnist"
Svoboda
The party's priority is to deepen economic cooperation between Ukraine and the countries of the EU
The party's priority is to deepen economic cooperation between Ukraine and post-Soviet countries
Difficult to answer
When selecting a political party, which priority is closest to yours?
(continued)
40. When selecting a political party during elections, which is most
important to you?
40
6%
3%
<1%
1%
2%
3%
4%
6%
6%
34%
35%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Difficult to answer
I don’t pay attention to any of the aforementioned positions
when electing political party
What it suggests in environmental policy
How it supports language and culture
What it proposes for education and science
How it strengthens the position of Ukraine in the world
What it proposes for healthcare
How it defends our rights and freedoms
What it proposes for national security and defense
What it proposes for the economy
What it proposes for social policy (salaries, pensions,
employment, etc.)
41. What is another area you consider when selecting a political
party?
41
18%
3%
2%
2%
2%
5%
7%
9%
12%
18%
22%
0% 10% 20% 30%
Difficult to answer
I don’t pay attention to any of the aforementioned positions
when selecting political party
How it supports language and culture
What it proposes for environmental policy
What it proposes for education and science
How it strengthens the position of Ukraine in the world
What it proposes for national security and defense
What it proposes for healthcare
How it defends your rights and freedoms
What it proposes for the economy
What it proposes for social policy (salaries, pensions,
employment, etc.)
43. 43
If you could have only one or the other, which is more important
to you: a democratic system of government or a prosperous
economy?
13%
17%
16%
14%
14%
20%
19%
20%
20%
20%
34%
30%
29%
28%
27%
18%
20%
22%
21%
27%
15%
14%
12%
16%
12%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
July 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
April 2017
Democracy is definitely more important to me Democracy is somewhat more important to me
Prosperity is definitely more important to me
Difficult to answer
44. Which of the following are the three most important issues for
Ukraine?
44
1%
1%
1%
3%
4%
4%
7%
9%
10%
13%
17%
17%
23%
24%
26%
30%
52%
54%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Russian language status
Lack/Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Rights to land ownership
Delays in salary/pension payments
Russian presence in the Crimea
Crime
Relations with Russia
Hryvnia devaluation
Political instability
Social protection for the poor
Government incompetence
Inflation
Unemployment
Low industry production
Corruption within state bodies
Military conflict in Donbas
45. Which three of the following issues are the most important for you
personally?
45
1%
4%
1%
2%
6%
6%
6%
9%
10%
11%
14%
18%
26%
26%
32%
32%
33%
53%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Russian language status
Russian presence in the Crimea
Lack/Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Rights to land ownership
Relations with Russia
Crime
Delays in salary/pension payments
Political instability
Government incompetence
Low industry production
Hryvnia devaluation
Corruption within state bodies
Social protection for the poor
Military conflict in Donbas
Unemployment
Inflation
46. 46
3%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
5%
10%
12%
13%
22%
26%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Secure the country’s defense capability
Secure the unity of Ukraine
Make our cities and villages more comfortable for life
Achieve developed democracy so that citizens have more power
in decision-making processes
Make our country fairer and just
Restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine
Join the EU and NATO
Get rid of corruption
Secure a high level of economic development
Improve the quality of life of citizens
In your opinion, what should be the most important priority for
Ukraine’s development in the next 10 years?
47. 47
How would you characterize the detention of Roman Nasirov, the
former Head of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine?
30%
32%
38%
It represents political persecution and
selective justice
It demonstrates a real fight against
corruption
Difficult to answer
*Roman Nasirov headed the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine until his suspension in March 2017. He is being investigated by
the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) for alleged corruption worth up to two billion Ukrainian hryvnias ($74
million) in one of the highest-profile corruption cases ever in Ukraine.
48. Do you feel secure walking home alone in your neighborhood at
night?
48
19%
39%
23%
14%
6%
Yes, I feel completely safe
Yes, I feel safe most of the time
No, I never feel safe
Difficult to answer
50. 50
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be?
42%
36%
37%
32%
40%
42%
41%
52%
53%
59%
55%
57%
57%
55%
54%
51%
53%
40%
43%
41%
42%
37%
37%
36%
27%
24%
17%
14%
17%
15%
15%
15%
19%
18%
3%
4%
5%
6%
5%
5%
9%
6%
10%
9%
12%
12%
12%
14%
12%
14%
14%
15%
17%
17%
20%
18%
17%
14%
14%
13%
15%
20%
14%
16%
15%
19%
17%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2011
March 2012
May 2012
September 2012
May 2013
September 2013
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
European Union Customs Union Other Difficult to answer
51. 51
If Ukraine could only enter one international economic union,
which of the following should it be? (continued)
27%
38%
59%
83%
29%
31%
12%
2%
19%
20%
11%
8%
25%
11%
18%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
East
South
Center
West
European Union Customs Union Other Difficult to answer
52. 52
1%
4%
9%
13%
34%
38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Difficult to answer
Security guarantees
Guarantees that rules and standards will be observed
Greater ability to determine one's destiny
A better economic situation in Ukraine
Better living conditions for ordinary people
What do you expect from this international union first and foremost?
(Respondents who chose either the EU or Customs Union, n=1,687)
53. If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote?
34%
38%
43%
41%
48%
48%
45%
39%
43%
46%
43%
40%
31%
30%
28%
30%
30%
32%
29%
27%
9%
7%
17%
14%
8%
10%
10%
12%
11%
12%
13%
15%
8%
15%
17%
13%
16%
17%
17%
14%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
March 2014
April 2014
September 2014
July 2015
September 2015
November 2015
February 2016
June 2016
September 2016
April 2017
Would vote to join NATO Would vote against joining NATO
Would not vote Difficult to answer
53
54. 21%
33%
54%
71%
41%
42%
20%
10%
20%
14%
11%
7%
18%
10%
16%
12%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
East
South
Center
West
Would vote to join NATO Would vote against joining NATO Would not vote Difficult to answer
If a referendum were held today on Ukraine joining NATO, how
would you vote? (continued)
54
55. 55
2%
6%
41%
51%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Difficult to answer
NATO does not provide any benefits, but we need it for
international prestige
NATO will defend Ukraine
NATO will help Ukraine to increase its defense system
standards
In your opinion, what benefits does NATO provide to Ukraine?
(Respondents who believe Ukraine should join NATO, n=1,108)
58. Do you support the economic blockade of the so-called Donetsk
and Luhansk People’s Republics?
58
17%
20%
19%
27%
3%
14%
Fully support
Somewhat support
Definitely do not support
Haven’t heard anything about this
Difficult to answer
59. In your opinion, are the national authorities of Ukraine doing
enough to keep the liberated areas of the Donbas under Ukrainian
authority?
59
1%
12%
31%
41%
15%
Definitely yes
Somewhat yes
Definitely no
Difficult to answer
60. 60
11%
3%
3%
3%
10%
15%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Become part of Russia
Become an independent country
Part of Ukraine but with special status
Part of Ukraine but with extended authorities as a result of
decentralization reform
Part of Ukraine as before
In your opinion, what status should the Donbas territories under
the control of the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s
Republics have?
Support
Ukrainian Unity
61. 61
In your opinion, what status should the Donbas territories under
the control of the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s
Republics have? (continued)
November 2015 April 2017
Part of Ukraine as before 53% 55%
Part of Ukraine but with extended
authorities as a result of decentralization
reform
18% 15%
Part of Ukraine but with special status 9% 10%
Become part of Russia 4% 3%
Become an independent country 3% 3%
Other 1% 3%
Difficult to answer 12% 11%
62. 62
In your opinion, what status should the entire Donbas region have
(i.e., the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts)?
9%
2%
2%
2%
6%
8%
16%
56%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Become an independent country
Become part of Russia
The territories controlled today by the so-called Donetsk and
Luhansk People’s Republics should be separated from Ukraine
and the rest of the territory should stay within Ukraine
Part of Ukraine but with a special status
Part of Ukraine but with extended authorities as a result of
decentralization reform
Part of Ukraine as before
Support
Ukrainian Unity
63. 63
November 2015 April 2017
Part of Ukraine as before 53% 56%
Part of Ukraine but with extended
competences resulting from the
decentralization reform
20% 16%
Part of Ukraine but with a special status 6% 8%
Become part of Russia 2% 2%
Become an independent country 1% 2%
The territories controlled today by the so-
called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s
Republics should be separated from
Ukraine and the rest of the territory should
stay within Ukraine
7% 6%
Other 1% 2%
Difficult to answer 9% 9%
In you opinion, what status should the entire Donbas region have
(i.e., the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts)? (continued)
65. 65
21%
2%
2%
2%
11%
17%
45%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Become an independent country
Become part of Russia
Part of Ukraine but with a special status
Part of Ukraine but with extended authorities as a result of
decentralization reform
Part of Ukraine as before
In your opinion, what status should the Donbas territories under
the control of the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s
Republics have?
Support
Ukrainian Unity
66. 66
In your opinion, what status should the Donbas territories under
the control of the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s
Republics have? (continued)
November 2015 April 2017
Part of Ukraine as before 31% 45%
Part of Ukraine but with extended
competences resulting from the
decentralization reform
28% 17%
Part of Ukraine but with special status 13% 11%
Become an independent country 4% 2%
Become part of Russia 8% 2%
Other 1% 2%
Difficult to answer 15% 21%
67. 67
In your opinion, what status should the entire Donbas region have
(i.e. the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts)?
17%
1%
1%
1%
2%
9%
22%
47%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
The territories controlled today by the so-called Donetsk and
Luhansk People’s Republics should be separated from Ukraine
and the rest of the territory should stay within Ukraine
Become an independent country
Become part of Russia
Part of Ukraine but with a special status
Part of Ukraine but with extended authorities as a result of
decentralization reform
Part of Ukraine as before
Support
Ukrainian Unity
68. 68
November 2015 April 2017
Part of Ukraine as before 32% 47%
Part of Ukraine but with extended authorities as
a result of decentralization reform
35% 22%
Part of Ukraine but with a special status 8% 9%
Become part of Russia 7% 2%
Become an independent country 1% 1%
The territories controlled today by the so-called
Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics should
be separated from Ukraine and the rest of the
territory should stay within Ukraine
3% 1%
Other 1% 1%
Difficult to answer 14% 17%
In your opinion, which status should the entire Donbas region have
(i.e. the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts)? (continued)
69. In your opinion, are the national authorities of Ukraine doing
enough to keep the liberated areas of the Donbas within Ukrainian
territory?
69
6%
2%
18%
8%
23%
24%
29%
36%
25%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2015
April 2017
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Definitely no Difficult to answer
70. 70
In your opinion, which areas should the Ukrainian authorities
prioritize in order to keep the Donbas part of Ukraine?
(Three answers possible)
9%
3%
4%
24%
36%
42%
72%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Difficult to answer
Other
Focus on closer relations with the West (EU and NATO)
Focus on the status of the Donbas region and improve
relations with Russia
Improve basic services (health, education and
infrastructure)
Fight crime, corruption and reform the judiciary
Improve the economy and create jobs
71. 71
In your opinion, which areas should the Ukrainian authorities
prioritize in order to keep the Donbas part of Ukraine? (continued)
November 2015 April 2017
Improve the economy and create jobs 62% 72%
Fight crime, corruption and reform the judiciary 46% 42%
Improve basic services (health, education and
infrastructure)
46% 36%
Focus on the status of the Donbas region and
improve relations with Russia
19% 24%
Focus on closer relations with the West (EU and
NATO)
9% 4%
Other 2% 3%
Difficult to answer 12% 9%
72. 72
In your opinion, which issues should be the top priority for your
local authorities?
(Three answers possible)
3%
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
4%
4%
5%
6%
7%
7%
7%
8%
8%
9%
11%
14%
15%
26%
44%
48%
49%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Difficult to answer
Other
Land issues
Garbage collection
Cultural institutions
Sporting establishments
Pavements
Sewage
Kindergartens
Water supply
Public parks and squares
Heating
Yards and territories around houses
Street lightning
Schools
Environment
Transportation
Security
Industrial areas
Social assistance
Housing and communal areas
Medical institutions
Roads
73. In your opinion, which issues should be the top priority for your
local authorities? (continued)
(Three answers possible)
73
November 2015 April 2017
Roads 50% 49%
Medical institutions 37% 48%
Housing and communal areas 43% 44%
Social assistance 38% 26%
Industrial areas 14% 15%
Security 26% 14%
Transportation 25% 11%
Environment 21% 9%
Street lightning 34% 8%
Schools 22% 8%
Public parks and squares 15% 7%
Heating 25% 7%
Yards and territories around houses 25% 7%
Water supply 23% 6%
Kindergartens 19% 5%
Pavements 18% 4%
Sewage 16% 4%
Garbage collection 16% 3%
Cultural institutions 13% 3%
Sport establishments 11% 3%
Land issues 17% 2%
Other 10% 2%
Difficult to answer 10% 3%
74. Which of the following are the three most important issues for
Ukraine?
74
2%
3%
1%
2%
2%
4%
5%
7%
7%
8%
15%
16%
19%
23%
33%
35%
46%
63%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Difficult to answer
Other
Russian language status
Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Rights to land ownership
Delays in salary/pension payments
Russian presence in the Crimea
Hryvnia devaluation
Crime
Relations with Russia
Political instability
Social protection for the poor
Government incompetence
Inflation
Low industry production
Unemployment
Corruption within state bodies
Military conflict in the Donbas
75. Which three of the following are the most important issues for
Ukraine? (continued)
75
November 2015 April 2017
Military conflict in the Donbas 50% 63%
Corruption within state bodies 40% 46%
Unemployment 34% 35%
Low industry production 24% 33%
Inflation 23% 23%
Government incompetence 26% 19%
Social protection for the poor 22% 16%
Political instability 18% 15%
Relations with Russia 12% 8%
Crime 5% 7%
Hryvnia devaluation 14% 7%
Russian presence in the Crimea 3% 5%
Delays in salary/pension payments 6% 4%
Rights to land ownership 3% 2%
Possibility of cutting off gas,
electricity, water
7% 2%
Russian language status 1% 1%
Other 1% 3%
Difficult to answer 2% 2%
76. Which of the following issues are the three most important for you
personally?
76
6%
10%
2%
3%
3%
5%
6%
7%
9%
9%
11%
14%
14%
18%
21%
31%
50%
60%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Difficult to answer
Other
Russian language status
Rights to land ownership
Russian presence in Crimea
Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water
Crime
Relations with Russia
Delays in salary/pension payments
Political instability
Government incompetence
Hryvnia devaluation
Low industry production
Corruption within state bodies
Social protection for the poor
Unemployment
Inflation
Military conflict in the Donbas
77. Which of the following issues are the three most important for you
personally? (continued)
77
November 2015 April 2017
Military conflict in the Donbas 50% 60%
Inflation 43% 50%
Unemployment 29% 31%
Social protection for the poor 26% 21%
Corruption within state bodies 26% 18%
Low industry production 17% 14%
Hryvnia devaluation 21% 14%
Government incompetence 21% 11%
Delays in salary/pension payments 7% 9%
Political instability 11% 9%
Relations with Russia 8% 7%
Crime 3% 6%
Possibility of cutting off gas, electricity, water 10% 5%
Russian presence in the Crimea 3% 3%
Rights to land ownership 4% 3%
Russian language status 2% 2%
Other 6% 10%
Difficult to answer 2% 6%
78. What is your opinion of each of the following Ukrainian politicians
or members of the Ukrainian government?
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
1%
2%
2%
2%
1%
3%
5%
5%
10%
10%
20%
2%
3%
3%
3%
5%
5%
6%
5%
6%
7%
7%
7%
7%
7%
8%
8%
11%
12%
11%
12%
15%
16%
29%
14%
11%
16%
15%
18%
19%
22%
16%
15%
21%
15%
16%
18%
20%
19%
23%
20%
13%
11%
11%
19%
20%
14%
45%
75%
66%
66%
61%
48%
50%
51%
42%
51%
37%
57%
37%
56%
59%
53%
52%
16%
36%
30%
36%
28%
17%
14%
4%
8%
5%
9%
15%
6%
6%
2%
2%
24%
10%
12%
15%
14%
26%
20%
23%
28%
19%
35%
18%
26%
15%
12%
15%
15%
41%
31%
36%
17%
24%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
One of the leaders of UKROP Party, Hennadiy Korban
Former Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk
Head of Parliament Andriy Parubiy
Leader of the political party “Svoboda,” Oleh Tyahnybok
Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko
Mayor of Kyiv Vitaliy Klitschko
Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen Avakov
Mayor of Lviv Andriy Sadovyi
Former head of SBU Valentyn Nalyvaychenko
MP Nadia Savchenko
Mayor of Kharkiv Hennadiy Kernes
Former Governor of Odesa Oblast, Mikheil Saakashvili
Head of the political party “Civic Position” Anatoliy Hrytsenko
MP, leader of the political party “Fatherland,” Yulia Tymoshenko
President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko
MP, leader of Radical Party, Oleh Lyashko
Prime Minister Volodymyr Hroisman
Head of the Donetsk military-civic administration, Pavlo Zhebrivskyi
Former head of the parliamentary Party of Regions faction, Oleksandr Yefremov
Co-leader of Opposition Bloc, head of the opposition government, Borys Kolesnikov
MP, leader of the Opposition Bloc, Yuriy Boyko
MP, leader of the political party “Za Zhyttia,” Vadym Rabinovych
Businessman Rinat Akhmetov
Very favorable Somewhat favorable
Very unfavorable Have not heard the name Difficult to answer
1%
78
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
1%
2%
79. 79
2%
2%
7%
4%
22%
13%
49%
56%
20%
25%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2015
April 2017
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Definitely no Difficult to answer
Do you support the decision of the Russian Federation to send its
army to protect Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine?
80. 80
How do you evaluate Russia’s actions toward Crimea?
41%
43%
11%
12%
18%
11%
30%
34%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2015
April 2017
It is an illegal invasion and occupation of independent Ukraine
It is a lawful protection of Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine
Other
Difficult to answer
81. 81
In your opinion, which of the following should Ukraine do?
50%
54%
13%
4%
14%
15%
7%
2%
2%
2%
15%
23%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2015
April 2017
Remain a united country Remain a united country, but without Crimea
Divide into several countries
Other Difficult to answer
82. 2%
5%
9%
12%
28%
25%
54%
47%
8%
11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
November 2015
April 2017
Definitely yes Somewhat yes Definitely no Difficult to answer
Do you feel that the Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine are
under pressure or threat because of their language?
82
83. Do you support the economic blockade of the so-called Donetsk
and Luhansk People’s Republics?
83
5%
6%
17%
50%
1%
21%
Fully support
Somewhat support
Definitely do not support
Haven’t heard anything about this
Difficult to answer
87. Demographics
87
21%
33%
33%
11%
2%
1%
0% 50%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money to buy clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes,
but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a good
suit, a mobile phone or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money to purchase more
expensive items (e.g. appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like a
car or an apartment
Difficult to answer
FAMILYFINANCES
Nationwide
88. Demographics
44%
56%
29%
25%
46%
3%
75%
21%
4%
19%
43%
33%
20%
16%
1%
36%
5%
8%
7%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Male
Female
18-35
36-50
51+
Ukrainian
Russian
Ukrainian and Russian equally
Primary/Incomplete secondary
General secondary
Vocational secondary
Higher/Incomplete higher
Worker
White collar
Higher or medium level executive
Pensioner (not working)
Student
Housewife
Unemployed
Other
GENDERAGE
LANGUAGE
SPOKENAT
HOMEEDUCATIONOCCUPATION
88
Donbas Region
89. Demographics
89
20%
40%
1%
6%
21%
2%
9%
89%
11%
66%
34%
0% 50% 100%
Orthodox (Kyiv Patriarchate)
Orthodox (Moscow Patriarchate)
Greek Catholic
Atheist
I believe in God, but do not belong to any religion
Other
Difficult to answer
City
Village
Donetsk
Luhansk
RELIGION
TYPEOF
SETTLEMENTREGIONS
Donbas Region
90. Demographics
90
26%
41%
26%
3%
1%
3%
0% 50%
We need to save money for food
We have enough money for food, but we need to save or borrow
money to buy clothes and shoes
We have enough money for food and necessary clothing and shoes,
but we need to save or borrow money for other purchases like a good
suit, a mobile phone or a vacuum cleaner
We have enough money for food, clothing, shoes and other
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money to purchase more
expensive things (e.g. appliances)
We have enough money for food, clothes, shoes and expensive
purchases, but we need to save or borrow money for purchases like a
car or an apartment
Difficult to answer
FAMILYFINANCES
Donbas Region
91. www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls
Center for Insights in Survey Research
202.408.9450 | info@iri.org
This presentation was undertaken with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided
through the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD)
Programme réalisée avec l’appui financier du gouvernement du Canada accordé par l’entremise du
ministère des Affaires étrangères, du Commerce et du Développement (MAECD)
.
.