This document provides an overview of the ethical theory of utilitarianism. It discusses the key aspects of utilitarianism, including that it is a teleological or consequentialist system that calls for maximizing the greatest amount of goodness and happiness for the greatest number of people. It outlines the views of early utilitarian philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, and discusses different versions of utilitarianism like act- and rule-utilitarianism. The document also examines some of the main criticisms of utilitarianism, such as issues with measuring and calculating utility, the possibility of justifying normally impermissible actions, and concerns that it could violate integrity or justice.

1. Chapter Seven:
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a universal teleological system
It calls for the maximization of goodness in
society - that is, the greatest amount of
goodness for the greatest number of peopleand not merely the good of the agent

2. Two Types of Ethical Systems
Deontology:
From the Greek word deon
meaning “duty” and logos meaning “logic”. The
center of value is the act or kind of act; certain
features in the act itself have intrinsic value.
Teleological ethics: From the Greek word
telos meaning “goal directed”. The center of
value is the outcome or consequences of the act.

3. Classic Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham
Jeremy
Bentham (1748-1832)
He invented a scheme for measuring pain and
pleasure that he called the hedonic calculus.
According to Bentham, one should maximize
pleasure and minimize suffering.

4. Two Main Features of
Utilitarianism
The consequentialist principle : the rightness or
wrongness of an act is determined by the
goodness or badness of the results that flow from
it
The utility or hedonist principle : the only thing
that is good in itself is some specific type of state
(ie. pleasure, happiness, welfare)

5. John Stuart Mill
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)
Mill wanted to distinguish happiness from
mere pleasure.
Eudaimonistic utilitarianism
He defines happiness in terms of a higher order
of pleasures or satisfactions.
Higher or more refined pleasure are superior to
lower pleasures.

6. Act- and Rule-Utilitarianism
Act-utilitarianism:
An act is right if and only if
it results in as much good as any available
alternative.
Rule-utilitarianism:
An act is right if it is
required by a rule that is itself a member of a set
of rules whose acceptance would lead to greater
utility for society than any available alternative.

7. The Strengths of Utilitarianism
A single principle, an absolute system with a
potential answer for every situation.
It seems to get at the substance of morality
because it has a material core: promoting human
(and possibly animal) flourishing and reduce
suffering.
Well-suited to address the problem of posterity

8. Criticism of Utilitarianism
Problems with Formulating
Utilitarianism
How do you
measure the term “greatest”?
The greatest number of people over the
greatest amount of happiness –how to define?
What about those who are not in the greatest
amount?
Is it total or general happiness?

9. The Comparative Consequences
Objection
We normally
do not know the long term
consequences of all of our actions.
Consequences go on into the infinite future, so
we really cannot know them.
Calculation is impossible.

10. Two kinds of Consequences
1) Actual consequences of an act
2) Consequences that could reasonably have
been expected to occur

11. Two Corresponding
Right Actions
1) Absolutely right if it has the best actual
consequences
(as per consequence 1)
2) Objectively right if it is reasonable to expect
that it will have the best consequences
(as per consequence 2)

12. The Consistency Objection to
Rule-Utilitarianism
When pushed to its logical limits, it must either
become a deontological system or transform
itself into act-utilitarianism

13. The No-Rest Objection
We always have an infinite set of possible acts to
choose from, and even if I can be excused
from considering all of them, I can be fairly
sure that there is often a preferable act that I
could be doing.

14. The Publicity Objection
Moral principles must be known to all, but
utilitarians do not claim everyone should act
like a utilitarian.

15. The Relativism Objection
It seems to endorse different rules in different
societies
Also, the more serious worry is that it might
become so plastic that it justifies any moral
rule.

16. Criticism of the Ends Justifying
Immoral Means
1) If a moral theory justifies actions that we
universally deem impermissible, then that
moral theory must be rejected
2) Utilitarianism justifies actions that we
universally deem impermissible
3) Therefore, utilitarianism must be rejected

17. The Lying Objection
It leads to the counterintuitive endorsement of
lying when it serves the greater good

18. The Integrity Objection
Personal integrity can be violated by
commanding that we violate our most central
and deeply held principles

19. The Justice Objection
Utilitarians could consider actions that go
against standards of justice that most of us
think should never be dispensed with