3. TEAM 5 3
MIRTE de GRAAFF | structural engineer
building technology engineer | REMCO KEMPERMAN
building services engineer | TEUN van SCHIJNDEL RICHARD ter MATEN | structural BIM
architect | TIMO CARDOL
BART DANKERS | process manager
architectural BIM | VINCENT de WIT
SASKIA de NIE | sustainable engineer
4. MULTIDISCIPLINARY
MULTI DISCIPLINARY TEAM 4
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
REAL ESTATE & HOUSING CIVIL ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE REAL ESTATE & HOUSING
ARCHITECTURE
REAL ESTATE & HOUSING
5. STATISTICS 5
The past 8 weeks together we spend 2.464 hours
on this workshop.
We drunk about 1.232 coffees...
AND 943 choco-de-luxe
6. TABLE OF CONTENT 6
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
7. TABLE OF CONTENT 7
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
18. STRATEGY 18
BIM CYCLES: OPTIMALISATIONS
Time line 8 maart 11 maart 18 maart
Convert to revit
Discuss Build revit model
TH
3
TH
Find solutions Find errors
2
ST
1
20. TABLE OF CONTENT 20
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
21. VISION 21
“1+1=3”
WE BASE OUR DESIGN SOLUTIONS ON
ADDED VALUE FOR THE WHOLE OF THE BUILDING
22. VISION 22
Abstract
Function
Structure
Shape
Design Make Use Discard re-use
Time
Architect
User | owner | city | community | developer
BIM engineer
User | owner | city | community | developer
Proces manager
User | owner | city | community | developer
Sustainable engineer
User | owner | city | community | developer
Building service engineer
User | owner | city | community | developer
Builtding technolity engineer
User | owner | city | community | developer
Actors
IN THE 3 DIMENSIONS OF THE INTEGRATED DESIGN PROCES
24. VISION 24
0h 35min: Amsterdam
0h 20min: Schiphol
Rotterdam 0h 40min: Utrecht
Londen 0h 35min: Antwerp
2h 14 min: Dusseldorf
1h 10min: Brussels
2h 40 min: Paris
LOCATION HAS INFLUENCE ON THE BUILDING:
CONNECTIONS WITH BUSSINESS HUBS
25. VISION 25
2100
2010
WE SEE OUR BUILDING AS AN URBAN AREA
THAT WILL BE ADEQUATE FOR A LONG TIME
26. VISION 26
2020
BUILDING HAS INFLUENCE ON ITS SURROUNDINGS
27. VISION 27
2020
N
RLIJ
IJN S POO
ORL
SPO AM
M T ERD
RDA ROT RAAL
RO TTE AL T
CEN
TRA CEN
N
RLIJ
ENA ENA
WE WE
A
COO
O
O
C
C
COO
L N
L N
LSIN
L IN
L IN
LSIN
GEL
LIJN
E
E
I
GEL
B A
BAA
LIJN
I
L
L
N
BAA
AN
N
SURROUNDING ROUTING ON ITS SURROUNDINGS
28. VISION 28
WE NEED A DESIGN WHICH IS FLEXIBLE IN USE
30. TABLE OF CONTENT 30
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
31. CONCEPTS 31
SHOWCASE VERTICAL CITY LIGHTHOUSE
- MUSCLES IN SIGHT - ONE BUILDING - GOLD NUGGET
- FREE FLOORPLAN - ATRIA - ADDED URBAN LEVEL
- SILHOUETTE - CITY WALL - EFFICIENT
- HUMAN SCALE
32. CONCEPTS 32
Vertical city
Lighthouse
Showcase
Priority
EVALUATION DIAGRAM #1 10 value value value
ARCHITECT
Strengthen the walking route on ground level (station pompenburg centrum) 8 2 1 0
Relation between program on ground level and upper parts of the building 7 1 2 3
Relation between the building and its surrounding context 5 2 3 2
Creating an attractive building that represent the concept of highrise 9 1 2 3
An integrated building design (actors forms functions time) 10 1 0 3
All the spaces in the building have the same level quality 7 2 2 1
BUILDING INFORMATION MODEL
Level of integrated design for all design disciplines 10 2 1 3
Error risk during the future proces 8 1 0 2
Consistency in design process 8 3 2 0
PROCESS MANAGER
Building is flexible for use 9 2 3 0
The building implementation is feasible 10 1 0 2
Space efficiency 8 1 1 1
Material efficiency 8 1 1 3
Building can be delivered in phases 6 1 1 2
All parts of the program are commercial attractive 10 1 3 3
SUSTAINABLE ENGINEER
Smart solutions for energy consumption 7 2 3 1
Closing cycles of energy, water and materials 6 1 1 2
Sustainability is integral incorporated in the design 9 2 2 3
The building can be used flexible in time 7 1 2 3
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Minimal use of materials 9 1 1 1
Contribution of construction to the concept and design 7 1 3 1
Dimished Gross Floor Area needed for construction 8 2 1 2
BUILDING SERVICES
efficient horizontal transport 9 2 3 1
Efficient division of installation system 7 0 2 3
Match of the construction with the concept 7 0 2 2
Firesafety of the design 6 0 2 1
comfort of use 9 2 1 1
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Use the façade to serve the sustainable concept 7 1 3 3
Low maintenance of the building 9 3 2 3
Cold bridges 9 0 3 2
Free floor plans and connection with interior walls 6 1 2 3
No unnecessary large façade area 9 2 1 1
Free view from interior to exterior 6 2 1 1
REMAINING
consistency of the concept in the design 9 2 1 2
suitable for the urban requirements 9 1 2 1
Prevention of wind inconvenience 9 1 2 2
TOTAL PRODUCT 200 72 296
OUR CHOICE...
VERTICAL CITY
33. CONCEPTS 33
SWOT ANALYSIS
1. DEFINE WEAKNESSES OF VERTICAL CITY
2. EXTRACT STRENGTHS OF OTHER CONCEPTS
3. USE OTHER CONCEPTS TO GIVE US SOLUTIONS
4. TURN WEAKNESSES INTO OPPORTUNITIES
34. CONCEPTS 34
LIGHTHOUSE VERTICAL CITY SHOWCASE
ANSWERS QUESTIONS ANSWERS
+ +
EFFICIENT INEFFICIENT FLOORPLANS
MORE DAYLIGHT = LESS ENERGY LIGHT ADMISSION
SILHOUETTE CREATING GATE FOR ROTTERDAM
INTEGRATED DESIGN COMPLEX TECHNOLOGY
LESS FLEXIBLE FLOORPLANS FLEXIBLE DUE TO EXTERNAL ELEVATORS
HIGH RISK DUE TO ATRIUM
EXPENSIVE FACADE PREFAB ELEMENTS
LOW EFFICIENCY
EXPENSIVE VERTICAL TRANSPORT BOTH TRANSFER & SERVICE AREAS
INNOVATION IN CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM HIGH RISK VARIANT
CORE + OUTRIGGERS+FACADE = STABILITY COMPLEX STRUCTURE
NO ENERGY GENERATION PV CELLS ON FACADE
TOO MUCH MATERIAL
SHADING BY FACADE THICK FACADE
LESS MISTAKES BY INTEGRATED DESIGN COMPLICATED DESIGN
INTEGRATION MODEL
35. TABLE OF CONTENT 35
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
62. PLINTH 62
END SCHIEKADEBLOCK WITH AN
HUMAN SCALE PLINTH.
CEES DAM BUILDING REMAINS
AS IT FUNCTIONS WELL IN IT’S CURRENT PRESENCE
CREATE A MODULAR PLINTH THAT COULD
CONNECT TO THE HOFPLEIN IN THE FUTURE...
77. FACADE 77
POSSIBILITY OF STRUCTURE & INSTALLATIONS IN CITY WALL
78. FACADE 78
CITY IS REFLECTED
BY THE PLINTH & ATRIUM FACADE
AND PROTECTED BY THE HIGH RISE SHELL
THESE TWO CREATE AN
APPROPIATE HIGH RISE FACADE
79. EFFICIENCY 79
SHIELD & CORE IN PLAN MAKE LETTABLE SPACE
FLEXIBLE & EFFICIENT
80. EFFICIENCY 80
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
SMALL EFFICIENT CORES
- TRANSPORT IN DISTRICTS
- DUCTS IN FACADES
- MULTIPLE USE OF CORE SPACE
81. EFFICIENCY 81
TRAINS
Fire
Fire
TRAMS
Fire
Fire
TRAINS
SMALL EFFICIENT CORES
- TRANSPORT IN DISTRICTS
- DUCTS IN FACADES
- MULTIPLE USE OF CORE SPACE
82. FACADE 82
CITY IS REFLECTED
BY THE PLINTH & ATRIUM FACADE
AND PROTECTED BY THE HIGH RISE SHELL
THESE TWO CREATE AN
APPROPIATE HIGH RISE FACADE
83. EFFICIENCY 83
100
90
88% 84% 81%
90% 91% 95% 91% 94%
85% av. 77% Excl. extra public space
80 73%
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 0
av. 72%
0
EFFICIENCY LA / GFA
101. TRANSPORT 101
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Installation Installation
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Departures
Installation Installation
platform
2 1
Fire Freight elevator
Fire Hotel
High speed housing elevator
Fire
Fire
3 4
platform
Departures
103. FIRE SAFETY 103
Max floorspace (without vide) 1314 m² GFA
Corecompartment + facade/structure 320 m²
Fire compartment 994 m² = <1000 m²
Fire Fire
8,6 m 28,8 m
USABLE FLOOR SPACE 26,1 m
< 1000 M2
FLEXIBLE SPACE
ONE FIRE COMPARTMENT
8,6 m 28,8 m
Fire
Fire
Max floorspace (without vide) 1314 m² GFA
Corecompartment + facade/structure 320 m²
Fire compartment 994 m² = <1000 m²
104. STRUCTURAL CONCEPT 104
EXTRA COLUMNS IN ATRIUM FACADE:
LESS DEFORMATIONS & SIMPLE JOINTS
129. AIR SYSTEM 129
FRESH AIR INTAKE ON HEIGHT = CLEANER AIR
Ventilation Electricity
Transformer
Restaurant Housing
90.000 m³/h 702 MWh/year
2x d=1600mm
Atrium
Transformer
Club
111 MWh/year
Club
Office
100.000 m³/h
2x d=1600mm 5.040 MWh/year
6x2400 m³/h 6x400 m³/h Transfer
500x630 mm 150x600 mm Atrium 425 MWh/year
Transformer
Offices
14.400 m³/h Congress
1200x1200 mm 442 MWh/year
6x2400 m³/h Congress
500x630 mm 285.000 m³/h
4x d=1600mm Hotel
702 MWh/year
Atrium
Transformer
Retail
433.000 m³/h Casino
6x d=1600mm 1.029 MWh/year
Casino 6x72.000 m³/h
205.000 m³/h d=1600mm
3x d=1600mm
Retail
1.680 MWh/year
High voltage/
low voltage
Total 10.137 MWh/year
EXHAUST INTO THE ATRIUM
CREATING A CLIMATE BUFFER
130. HEATING 130
city heating: RE-USE WASTE HEAT
WASTE HEAT
40 ELECTRICITY
ENERGY ELECTRICITY
PLANT HARBOUR
60 WASTE HEAT INDUSTRY
CITY HEATING
40 ELECTRICITY
ENERGY ELECTRICITY
PLANT HARBOUR
60 CITY HEATING INDUSTRY
131. HEAT SYSTEM 131
ADIABATIC COOLING
COOLING - ON TRANSFERFLOOR
Menerga serie 98, hybrid watercoolingmachine
Stage 1: Adiabatic cooling Stage 2: Mix Stage 3: Mechanical cooling
air
humidifier scrollcompressors
water
HEATING
City heating
After treatment
heat exchanger
Pump
in basement
CITY HEATING
132. WATER 132
WATER SYSTEM 50 % DECREASE OF DEMAND
GREY WATER
TANK
133. WATER 133
COLLECTING RAINWATER
REUSE OF GREY WATER IN MULTIPLE WAYS
134. COSTS 134
FOUNDATION COSTS
6%
Elavators SKELET
STRUCTURE
22% 13% ROOF
0,3%
Façade
5%
Floors
11%
Services (W/E)
35%
Fi ng out costs
8%
Calculated investment :
€ 845 miljoen
GIY
excl. parking
€ 692 million € 850 million
GIY: 6,3 GIY:7,6
AVERAGE RENT PRICE: 300M2/YEAR
Average rent price: 300 euro m2/year
135. TABLE OF CONTENT 135
AMBITION
STRATEGY
VISION
CONCEPTS
FINAL CONCEPT
HOOGKWARTIER
REFLECTION
136. SUMMARY 136
WHAT WE NEEDED TO SOLVE IN VERTICAL CITY
& WHAT WE TOOK FROM OTHER CONCEPTS
VERTICAL CITY HOOGKWARTIER
QUESTIONS ANSWERS
INEFFICIENT FLOORPLANS COPY FLOORPLANS + CORE (LH)
LIGHT ADMISSION FLOOR-FLOOR WINDOWS > MUSCLES (SC)
SILHOUETTE GOLD NUGGET (LH) LIGHTHOUSE & GATE (SC)
COMPLEX TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATED DESIGN (LH)
LESS FLEXIBLE FLOORPLANS SMART ELEVATOR SYSTEM (SC)
EXPENSIVE FACADE GOLD NUGGET ON TOPLIGHTHOUSE
EXPENSIVE VERTICAL TRANSPORT SKYBRIDGES WITH TRANSFER & SERVICES (SC)
HIGH RISK VARIANT INNOVATION IN COMBINING SYSTEMS (LH)
COMPLEX STRUCTURE BRIDGES + VISIBLE K-FRAMES = NO OUTRIGGERS (SC)
NO ENERGY GENERATION PV CELLS ON SOUTH FACADE IN STEAD OF MESH (LH)
THICK FACADE USE FACADE AS SHUTTER (LH)
COMPLICATED DESIGN INTEGRATED DESIGN (LH)