Intranet challenges:  an involving approach
the intranet challenges
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
1°  ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY
2°   GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR  wants intranet to do  this
2°   GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR  wants intranet to do  this Production  wants intranet to do  that
2°   GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR  wants intranet to do  this Production  wants intranet to do  that n.  Department X  wants intranet to do  Y
2°   GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR  wants intranet to do  this Production  wants intranet to do  that n.  Department X  wants intranet to do  Y IT  wants just to do  less
3°  Legacy and already existent apps SAP
3°  Legacy and already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory
3°  Legacy and already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool , Lotus Notes,
3°  Legacy and already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool Shared folders (or autodestruction button)  , Lotus Notes,
3°  Legacy and already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool Shared folders (or autodestruction button)  , Lotus Notes, and many many more
the technological approach
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanks to Dilbert!
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanks to http://www.flickr.com/photos/theolaphoto/2394966982/
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanks to http://www.flickr.com/photos/theolaphoto/2394966982/ A Websphere (or other proprietary software) out of the box installation in your enterprise
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanks to http://www.flickr.com/photos/46264733@N00/268156261/in/photostream/ but there’s no that big difference if you bought an open source one:
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanks to http://www.flickr.com/photos/46264733@N00/268156261/in/photostream/ but there’s no that big difference if you bought an open source one:  It’s just cheaper
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH They are monolith for which have spent  $$$ and you can just workship
TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH They are monolith for which have spent  $$$ and you can just workship (HR) I pray you to simplify the vacation planning system! (IT) Please speak to the Active Directory… (Production) I need your help to support my process!
the involving approach
INVOLVING APPROACH Involve stakeholders Involve users needs first, then technology Permanent beta
INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS every intranet is different , since every enterprise is different an intranet has  a strong organizational impact , be prepared to afford it an intranet  could change  not only the  processes  but also the  approach to work Training talk to Intranet project owner (HR) and to IT
INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS to let them know we were working to create an intranet  ( is not a monolith suddenly and unexpectately coming from the outer space ) to explain them what an intranet is  and how it could affect ( and hopely improve ) their work ( intranet will not be MORE work, just work done simpler and more effective ) to get their engagement : “we want everyone among you help us with concrete ideas, we want you spread the words to all of your collegues” to find champions and evangelist capable people  between them to get them involved in the design and test phase. Brainstorming about “Intranet” with more than 30 people form every Honda’s department
INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS Project overview to managers to  let them know we were going to involve  a  lot of people  in our project to get their sponsorship
INVOLVE USERS Brainstorming  with more than 30 people from every Honda’s department Needs definition 85 ideas for the intranet!
INVOLVE USERS Needs definition Focus group  people who manage other people and people which don’t people from every department  people working in the offices and people from the assembly line people from Atessa and people from Rome (two main Honda locations in Italy)
INVOLVE USERS Needs definition Focus group  how they use computer and software in their everyday work which processes could be improved and how ? do they find all the information needed for everyday work ? do they need different tools to gain better access and a better way to manage this information ? and more questions
INVOLVE USERS Needs definition Survey To all 1000 workers to also have a quantitative analysis
INVOLVE USERS Design Card sorting,  many open card sorting sessions were done to build    the intranet Information Architecture Card sorting  allowed us to build an user friendly navigation structure, where findability is really high
INVOLVE USERS As soon as the first working software pieces became available, we started calling back several “champions users” groups: to show them the work done to understand if it met their needs  to fine tune our work and reschedule project priorities Testing Feedback during development
INVOLVE USERS We met and talked directly to more than 100 people on 1000
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY After brainstorming, focus group and survey we had  a  clear idea of final users’ needs So  we helped Honda to assign priority to some of those , using a scheme like this  one Thanks to Alberto Mucignat http://www.mucignat.com/blog/archives/673-definire-le-priorita-di-un-progetto.html /
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY Thanks to Alberto Mucignat http://www.mucignat.com/blog/archives/673-definire-le-priorita-di-un-progetto.html /
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY Knowing needs  we were able to choose the best fitting technology  Benchmarking: Proprietary software Open Source software
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY Knowing needs  we were able to choose the best fitting technology  Benchmarking: Proprietary software Open Source software
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY Thanks to Dilbert
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY The users define features end evolution roadmap Time to market  ( do   i need a feature? I can ask the community or i can do by myself; i’ve not to wait months for a new commercial release ) Open standard  (often easier to integrate) Freedom from a unique vendor Open Source benefit
NEEDS FIRST, THEN TECHNOLOGY (IT) Please speak to the Active Directory… No licenses, so all the money  is spent not to buy a monolith, but to start answering user’s needs immediately,  customizing and tailoring  the software to Honda’s needs Open Source benefit (HR) I pray you to simplify the vacation planning system! (Production) I need your help to support my process! $$$
PERMANENT BETA The launch is a starting point, not an arrival point
PERMANENT BETA Intranets have to grow with the enterprise. If an intranet is unchanged after 6 months lifetime, it is getting obsolete: the enterprise is 6 month ahead. The launch is a starting point, not an arrival point
PERMANENT BETA Intranets are never finished An intranet is always a work in progress. Although initial intranet builds follow a reasonably linear path, once implementation has taken place there is no single path forward and the next steps will largely depend on a combination of organisational imperative and the constraints the team is operating under. Cairo Walker  Step Two
PERMANENT BETA Doing  Card Sorting  using contents satisfying Needs group 1 (high priority), but also group 2 and 3, will permit the Information Architecture  to   include future content with no major change , avoiding user’s confusion
PERMANENT BETA Choosing a  Open Source  software will avoid waiting new commercial version to have new features (often not useful) added. Choosing  Open Source will permit to follow the enterprise needs continuously and to adapt better and faster  to new challenges (also thanks to what the community create and make public)
BRIEFLY Intranet Challenges Organizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications
BRIEFLY Intranet Challenges Organizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications
BRIEFLY Intranet Challenges Organizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications Involving approach Involve stakeholders Involve users Needs first, then technology Permanent beta
Thanks!
AUTHORS Cristiano Siri User Experience Designer [email_address] friendfeed.com/ cristianosiri www.linkedin.com/in/ cristianosiri friendfeed.com/ uxalia
AUTHORS Giacomo Mason Intranet Consultant [email_address] www.intranetmanagement.it

An involving approach to intranet design

  • 1.
    Intranet challenges: an involving approach
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR wants intranet to do this
  • 10.
    GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR wants intranet to do this Production wants intranet to do that
  • 11.
    GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR wants intranet to do this Production wants intranet to do that n. Department X wants intranet to do Y
  • 12.
    GOALS’ HETEROGENEITY Giacomo Mason – Cristiano Siri HR wants intranet to do this Production wants intranet to do that n. Department X wants intranet to do Y IT wants just to do less
  • 13.
    3° Legacyand already existent apps SAP
  • 14.
    3° Legacyand already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory
  • 15.
    3° Legacyand already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool , Lotus Notes,
  • 16.
    3° Legacyand already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool Shared folders (or autodestruction button) , Lotus Notes,
  • 17.
    3° Legacyand already existent apps SAP , 3 Active Directory , E-Procurement tool Shared folders (or autodestruction button) , Lotus Notes, and many many more
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanksto http://www.flickr.com/photos/theolaphoto/2394966982/
  • 21.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanksto http://www.flickr.com/photos/theolaphoto/2394966982/ A Websphere (or other proprietary software) out of the box installation in your enterprise
  • 22.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanksto http://www.flickr.com/photos/46264733@N00/268156261/in/photostream/ but there’s no that big difference if you bought an open source one:
  • 23.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Thanksto http://www.flickr.com/photos/46264733@N00/268156261/in/photostream/ but there’s no that big difference if you bought an open source one: It’s just cheaper
  • 24.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Theyare monolith for which have spent $$$ and you can just workship
  • 25.
    TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH Theyare monolith for which have spent $$$ and you can just workship (HR) I pray you to simplify the vacation planning system! (IT) Please speak to the Active Directory… (Production) I need your help to support my process!
  • 26.
  • 27.
    INVOLVING APPROACH Involvestakeholders Involve users needs first, then technology Permanent beta
  • 28.
    INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS everyintranet is different , since every enterprise is different an intranet has a strong organizational impact , be prepared to afford it an intranet could change not only the processes but also the approach to work Training talk to Intranet project owner (HR) and to IT
  • 29.
    INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS tolet them know we were working to create an intranet ( is not a monolith suddenly and unexpectately coming from the outer space ) to explain them what an intranet is and how it could affect ( and hopely improve ) their work ( intranet will not be MORE work, just work done simpler and more effective ) to get their engagement : “we want everyone among you help us with concrete ideas, we want you spread the words to all of your collegues” to find champions and evangelist capable people between them to get them involved in the design and test phase. Brainstorming about “Intranet” with more than 30 people form every Honda’s department
  • 30.
    INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS Projectoverview to managers to let them know we were going to involve a lot of people in our project to get their sponsorship
  • 31.
    INVOLVE USERS Brainstorming with more than 30 people from every Honda’s department Needs definition 85 ideas for the intranet!
  • 32.
    INVOLVE USERS Needsdefinition Focus group people who manage other people and people which don’t people from every department people working in the offices and people from the assembly line people from Atessa and people from Rome (two main Honda locations in Italy)
  • 33.
    INVOLVE USERS Needsdefinition Focus group how they use computer and software in their everyday work which processes could be improved and how ? do they find all the information needed for everyday work ? do they need different tools to gain better access and a better way to manage this information ? and more questions
  • 34.
    INVOLVE USERS Needsdefinition Survey To all 1000 workers to also have a quantitative analysis
  • 35.
    INVOLVE USERS DesignCard sorting, many open card sorting sessions were done to build the intranet Information Architecture Card sorting allowed us to build an user friendly navigation structure, where findability is really high
  • 36.
    INVOLVE USERS Assoon as the first working software pieces became available, we started calling back several “champions users” groups: to show them the work done to understand if it met their needs to fine tune our work and reschedule project priorities Testing Feedback during development
  • 37.
    INVOLVE USERS Wemet and talked directly to more than 100 people on 1000
  • 38.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY After brainstorming, focus group and survey we had a clear idea of final users’ needs So we helped Honda to assign priority to some of those , using a scheme like this one Thanks to Alberto Mucignat http://www.mucignat.com/blog/archives/673-definire-le-priorita-di-un-progetto.html /
  • 39.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY Thanks to Alberto Mucignat http://www.mucignat.com/blog/archives/673-definire-le-priorita-di-un-progetto.html /
  • 40.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY Knowing needs we were able to choose the best fitting technology Benchmarking: Proprietary software Open Source software
  • 41.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY Knowing needs we were able to choose the best fitting technology Benchmarking: Proprietary software Open Source software
  • 42.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY Thanks to Dilbert
  • 43.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY The users define features end evolution roadmap Time to market ( do i need a feature? I can ask the community or i can do by myself; i’ve not to wait months for a new commercial release ) Open standard (often easier to integrate) Freedom from a unique vendor Open Source benefit
  • 44.
    NEEDS FIRST, THENTECHNOLOGY (IT) Please speak to the Active Directory… No licenses, so all the money is spent not to buy a monolith, but to start answering user’s needs immediately, customizing and tailoring the software to Honda’s needs Open Source benefit (HR) I pray you to simplify the vacation planning system! (Production) I need your help to support my process! $$$
  • 45.
    PERMANENT BETA Thelaunch is a starting point, not an arrival point
  • 46.
    PERMANENT BETA Intranetshave to grow with the enterprise. If an intranet is unchanged after 6 months lifetime, it is getting obsolete: the enterprise is 6 month ahead. The launch is a starting point, not an arrival point
  • 47.
    PERMANENT BETA Intranetsare never finished An intranet is always a work in progress. Although initial intranet builds follow a reasonably linear path, once implementation has taken place there is no single path forward and the next steps will largely depend on a combination of organisational imperative and the constraints the team is operating under. Cairo Walker Step Two
  • 48.
    PERMANENT BETA Doing Card Sorting using contents satisfying Needs group 1 (high priority), but also group 2 and 3, will permit the Information Architecture to include future content with no major change , avoiding user’s confusion
  • 49.
    PERMANENT BETA Choosinga Open Source software will avoid waiting new commercial version to have new features (often not useful) added. Choosing Open Source will permit to follow the enterprise needs continuously and to adapt better and faster to new challenges (also thanks to what the community create and make public)
  • 50.
    BRIEFLY Intranet ChallengesOrganizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications
  • 51.
    BRIEFLY Intranet ChallengesOrganizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications
  • 52.
    BRIEFLY Intranet ChallengesOrganizational complexity Goals’ heterogenity Legacy and already existent applications Involving approach Involve stakeholders Involve users Needs first, then technology Permanent beta
  • 53.
  • 54.
    AUTHORS Cristiano SiriUser Experience Designer [email_address] friendfeed.com/ cristianosiri www.linkedin.com/in/ cristianosiri friendfeed.com/ uxalia
  • 55.
    AUTHORS Giacomo MasonIntranet Consultant [email_address] www.intranetmanagement.it

Editor's Notes

  • #41 focusing not only on the needs’ group 1 (high priority) but also on the medium and long term (group 2 and 3).
  • #42 focusing not only on the needs’ group 1 (high priority) but also on the medium and long term (group 2 and 3).