Universal Open Access
Are we there yet?
Louise Page
Chief Innovation Officer, PLOS
SciELO 20 Anos | 28 September 2018
Research is a dynamic process…
Twin Problems of Assessment and Access
2017 Highlights
Open Access is good bu$ine$$
Improve Incentives
• Focus on study design and
methods (not just results)
• Develop better ways to
reward failure
• More and better (article
level) metrics
Open Access allows everyone to access
research. Open Data allows everyone
to do research.
>100,000
Articles published with a data
availability statement at PLOS
<0.1%
of submissions rejected due to
authors’ unwillingness or inability
to share data
~23%
of submissions use data
repositories
PLOS Open Data Policy, since 2014
Mainstream Peer Review Transparency
Peer review can and should be improved:
• Increase transparency of review
• Disaggregate review of specific aspects:
• Rigor vs. importance
• Parallel research outputs (methodology, data,
code, etc.)
• Review as an ongoing process
Moving Towards the
Open, Networked Article
• Develop norms for sharing
protocols
• Share other outputs using FAIR
principles
• New forms of commenting and
assessment
• Add credit for fulfilling these
obligations
• Envision something more research-
shaped
Build Sustainable Infrastructure
• Support and facilitate FAIR sharing of all research
outputs (especially data)
• Promote open source and embrace interoperable,
open standards and digital identifiers
• Potential of new technologies to leapfrog
“The saddest aspect of life right now is that
science gathers knowledge faster than society
gathers wisdom.”
- Isaac Asimov
Obrigados.
lpage@plos.org

Louise Page - Universal Open Access: Are we there yet?

  • 1.
    Universal Open Access Arewe there yet? Louise Page Chief Innovation Officer, PLOS SciELO 20 Anos | 28 September 2018
  • 2.
    Research is adynamic process…
  • 3.
    Twin Problems ofAssessment and Access
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Open Access isgood bu$ine$$
  • 9.
    Improve Incentives • Focuson study design and methods (not just results) • Develop better ways to reward failure • More and better (article level) metrics
  • 10.
    Open Access allowseveryone to access research. Open Data allows everyone to do research.
  • 11.
    >100,000 Articles published witha data availability statement at PLOS <0.1% of submissions rejected due to authors’ unwillingness or inability to share data ~23% of submissions use data repositories PLOS Open Data Policy, since 2014
  • 12.
    Mainstream Peer ReviewTransparency Peer review can and should be improved: • Increase transparency of review • Disaggregate review of specific aspects: • Rigor vs. importance • Parallel research outputs (methodology, data, code, etc.) • Review as an ongoing process
  • 13.
    Moving Towards the Open,Networked Article • Develop norms for sharing protocols • Share other outputs using FAIR principles • New forms of commenting and assessment • Add credit for fulfilling these obligations • Envision something more research- shaped
  • 14.
    Build Sustainable Infrastructure •Support and facilitate FAIR sharing of all research outputs (especially data) • Promote open source and embrace interoperable, open standards and digital identifiers • Potential of new technologies to leapfrog
  • 16.
    “The saddest aspectof life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.” - Isaac Asimov
  • 17.