Examining Ohio’s Approach to Measuring Student Success
Series Session #1: Value-Added Information’s Role in Classroom and School Improvement
• First in a series of symposia, hosted by the OERC in partnership with Ohio Department of Education and Battelle for Kids, that are designed to bring together researchers, policy influencers, and educators to gain background and common understanding around how to help educators use analytics to drive classroom and school improvement.
• This session will lay the groundwork by beginning the conversation around the national value-added analysis landscape, Ohio’s established history with its value-added model, and where we are heading with the use of powerful education measures to inform curriculum, instruction, accountability, and evaluation.
Examining Ohio’s Approach to Measuring Student Success
Series Session #1: Value-Added Information’s Role in Classroom and School Improvement
• First in a series of symposia, hosted by the OERC in partnership with Ohio Department of Education and Battelle for Kids, that are designed to bring together researchers, policy influencers, and educators to gain background and common understanding around how to help educators use analytics to drive classroom and school improvement.
• This session will lay the groundwork by beginning the conversation around the national value-added analysis landscape, Ohio’s established history with its value-added model, and where we are heading with the use of powerful education measures to inform curriculum, instruction, accountability, and evaluation.
This presentation was given by Melanie Ehren from the London Institute of Education at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the second Workshop B on the role of shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October 2016.
How to evaluate professional learning policies: Match policy to practice for ...Learning Forward
Believing that policy drives practice, Learning Forward created Professional Learning Policy Review: A Workbook for States and Districts to help educators assess if their policies support the professional learning required for changes such as implementing Common Core State Standards. Learn how to move people through a series of stages to evaluate the policies a system has in place and consider recommendations for changes.
Reviewing the Research and PEAC Recommendations around Principal EvaluationRichard Voltz
Presentation made by Benjamin Fenton, Chief Strategy and Knowledge Officer and Co-Founder of New Leaders for New Schools at the IASA sponsored workshop on November 18, 2011 at the Triple I Conference.
HEIR conference 8-9 September 2014: Forsyth and StubbsRachel Forsyth
Rewriting the Rules: Institutional procedural change based on analysis of student feedback
As part of a large JISC-supported institutional project on assessment and feedback, two different types of institutional data were analysed to identify potential changes to assessment procedures and practice. Comments from institutional student survey data were analysed to identify 10,000 comments relating to assessment. Coding of these comments enabled the project team to identify a series of areas for change which were common across the institution, rather than just using the survey data for course-level changes, which had happened in the past. This led to the production of new institutional assessment procedures designed to improve the student experience. Institutional records about assignment types, which had been produced simply to support course validation, were then analysed to discover the ten most common types of assignment in use across the institution. Detailed guidance on implementing the new procedures was then developed for these ten assignment types, which accounted for two-thirds of the total number of assignments being taken by students. The combination of data from different parts of the institution has enabled change to be made and supported in a way novel to the university.
Two professionals from the University of Maryland compare and share best practices for measuring student success with the University of Johannesburg. This presentation is a summary of their visit.
Sharing Responsibility for School AccountabilityEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Suzanne Dillon from the Irish Department of Education and Skills at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the second Workshop B on the role of shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October.
This mixed methods study explored racial or ethnic minority students who were enrolled in an online course to determine if there was a relationship between their online learning readiness characteristics and their outcomes across institutions. Also, minority student perceptions of what skills and experiences lead to success and how they can be better supported for online online learning is reported. Student surveys were administered using Likert and open-ended items to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Readiness characteristics included student reporting of their technology access, beliefs, and skills (technology access, online work skills, social technology skills, online efficacy), their self-efficacy (self-directedness and organization, achievement mindset, and growth mindset), and their communication (need for socialization, general communication competence, communication with instructor, and communication with peers), and student outcomes gathered included student perceptions of learning, self-reported satisfaction, and academic performance (course grade, instructor reported). Significant findings were discovered from multiple regression analyses indicating that several of these measures of readiness (online work skills, online efficacy, self-directedness and organization, communication with instructor, communication with classmates) positively influence student outcomes (learning, satisfaction, and academic performance). Qualitative findings indicate that minority students report time management, previous online course experience, and online work skills as the most prevalent themes of skills and experiences that positively influence their success. Moreover, they recommend that instructors and institutions provide them additional resources prior to the class to better prepare them to be successful, and that they receive support during the class by instructors and academic support staff. Recommendations are shared.
United in Diversity Attainment targets in Flemish Education GovernanceEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Rien Rouw of the OECD at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex world during the Workshop C on meeting national targets in decentralised systems (Flemish Case Study).
Inspections as a Twin Vehicle for School Development and ControlEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Bente Barton Dalhberg from the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the first Workshop A on shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October.
What models of governance are effective in complex education systems? In all systems an increasing number of stakeholders are involved in designing, delivering and monitoring education. Like our societies, education systems are increasingly diverse regarding students, teachers and communities, as well as the values and identities we expect education to deliver. These trends have increased the complexity of education systems, leaving decision makers on all governance levels with the question of how to successfully manoeuvre in this highly dynamic policy area.
Governing Education in a Complex World addresses key challenges involved in governing modern education systems, looking specifically at complexity, accountability, capacity building and strategic thinking. The publication brings together research from the OECD Secretariat and invited chapters from international scholars to provide a state of the art analysis and a fresh perspective on some of the most challenging issues facing educational systems today.
Creating the open, dynamic and strategic governance systems necessary for governing complex systems is not easy. This volume challenges our traditional concepts of education governance through work on complexity, collaborative networks and decision-making. In doing so it sets the agenda for thinking about the inclusive and adaptable systems necessary for governing education in today’s world. The volume will be a useful resource for those interested in education governance and complexity, particularly policy-makers, education leaders, teachers and the education research community.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
.
This presentation was given by Melanie Ehren from the London Institute of Education at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the second Workshop B on the role of shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October 2016.
How to evaluate professional learning policies: Match policy to practice for ...Learning Forward
Believing that policy drives practice, Learning Forward created Professional Learning Policy Review: A Workbook for States and Districts to help educators assess if their policies support the professional learning required for changes such as implementing Common Core State Standards. Learn how to move people through a series of stages to evaluate the policies a system has in place and consider recommendations for changes.
Reviewing the Research and PEAC Recommendations around Principal EvaluationRichard Voltz
Presentation made by Benjamin Fenton, Chief Strategy and Knowledge Officer and Co-Founder of New Leaders for New Schools at the IASA sponsored workshop on November 18, 2011 at the Triple I Conference.
HEIR conference 8-9 September 2014: Forsyth and StubbsRachel Forsyth
Rewriting the Rules: Institutional procedural change based on analysis of student feedback
As part of a large JISC-supported institutional project on assessment and feedback, two different types of institutional data were analysed to identify potential changes to assessment procedures and practice. Comments from institutional student survey data were analysed to identify 10,000 comments relating to assessment. Coding of these comments enabled the project team to identify a series of areas for change which were common across the institution, rather than just using the survey data for course-level changes, which had happened in the past. This led to the production of new institutional assessment procedures designed to improve the student experience. Institutional records about assignment types, which had been produced simply to support course validation, were then analysed to discover the ten most common types of assignment in use across the institution. Detailed guidance on implementing the new procedures was then developed for these ten assignment types, which accounted for two-thirds of the total number of assignments being taken by students. The combination of data from different parts of the institution has enabled change to be made and supported in a way novel to the university.
Two professionals from the University of Maryland compare and share best practices for measuring student success with the University of Johannesburg. This presentation is a summary of their visit.
Sharing Responsibility for School AccountabilityEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Suzanne Dillon from the Irish Department of Education and Skills at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the second Workshop B on the role of shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October.
This mixed methods study explored racial or ethnic minority students who were enrolled in an online course to determine if there was a relationship between their online learning readiness characteristics and their outcomes across institutions. Also, minority student perceptions of what skills and experiences lead to success and how they can be better supported for online online learning is reported. Student surveys were administered using Likert and open-ended items to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Readiness characteristics included student reporting of their technology access, beliefs, and skills (technology access, online work skills, social technology skills, online efficacy), their self-efficacy (self-directedness and organization, achievement mindset, and growth mindset), and their communication (need for socialization, general communication competence, communication with instructor, and communication with peers), and student outcomes gathered included student perceptions of learning, self-reported satisfaction, and academic performance (course grade, instructor reported). Significant findings were discovered from multiple regression analyses indicating that several of these measures of readiness (online work skills, online efficacy, self-directedness and organization, communication with instructor, communication with classmates) positively influence student outcomes (learning, satisfaction, and academic performance). Qualitative findings indicate that minority students report time management, previous online course experience, and online work skills as the most prevalent themes of skills and experiences that positively influence their success. Moreover, they recommend that instructors and institutions provide them additional resources prior to the class to better prepare them to be successful, and that they receive support during the class by instructors and academic support staff. Recommendations are shared.
United in Diversity Attainment targets in Flemish Education GovernanceEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Rien Rouw of the OECD at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex world during the Workshop C on meeting national targets in decentralised systems (Flemish Case Study).
Inspections as a Twin Vehicle for School Development and ControlEduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Bente Barton Dalhberg from the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training at the GCES Conference on Governing Education in a Complex World during the first Workshop A on shared responsibility in developing accountability mechanisms that work in Brussels on 17 October.
What models of governance are effective in complex education systems? In all systems an increasing number of stakeholders are involved in designing, delivering and monitoring education. Like our societies, education systems are increasingly diverse regarding students, teachers and communities, as well as the values and identities we expect education to deliver. These trends have increased the complexity of education systems, leaving decision makers on all governance levels with the question of how to successfully manoeuvre in this highly dynamic policy area.
Governing Education in a Complex World addresses key challenges involved in governing modern education systems, looking specifically at complexity, accountability, capacity building and strategic thinking. The publication brings together research from the OECD Secretariat and invited chapters from international scholars to provide a state of the art analysis and a fresh perspective on some of the most challenging issues facing educational systems today.
Creating the open, dynamic and strategic governance systems necessary for governing complex systems is not easy. This volume challenges our traditional concepts of education governance through work on complexity, collaborative networks and decision-making. In doing so it sets the agenda for thinking about the inclusive and adaptable systems necessary for governing education in today’s world. The volume will be a useful resource for those interested in education governance and complexity, particularly policy-makers, education leaders, teachers and the education research community.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
.
Presentation at the Florida Association of School Psychologists on using Universal Design for Learning principles to create an effective and equitable multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) for all students.
As part of National Careers Week 2021, the NCSEHE hosted a virtual event on 21 May, showcasing major NCSEHE-commissioned research on key influencers and careers advice for equity students.
More info: https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/careers-week-webinar-careers-student-equity/
Ellen Wagner, Executive Director, WCET.
Putting Data to Work
This session explores changing data sensibilities at US post-secondary institutions with particular attention paid to how predictive analytics are changing expectations for institutional accountability and student success. Results from the Predictive Analytics Reporting Framework show that predictive modeling can identify students at risk and that linking behavioral predictions of risk with interventions to mitigate those risks at the point of need is a powerful strategy for increasing rates of student retention, academic progress and completion.
presentation at the 15th annual SLN SOLsummit February 27, 2014
http://slnsolsummit2014.edublogs.org/
Over the past decade, the OMG Center for Collaborative Learning has served as the research and evaluation partner in more than a dozen foundation-supported efforts to improve college access and success outcomes, not just within individual programs, but also at a community level. In this workshop, the presenters will: a) present lessons learned from these community-level efforts; and b) guide participants in using a systems lens to identify how and where they fit in their local college access and completion system.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
3. Starting Point
• Rigid, less inclusive demographic markers
• Census style data can:
• Create gender binaries
• Confuse gender & sex
• Confuse race & ethnicity
• Fail to provide comprehensive racial & ethnic breakdowns
4. Benefits from Inclusive Practices
• Provides strategic direction forward as campuses make
inclusion mission critical
• Supplements current accountability measures to improve
experiences of at-risk students
• Serves as a starting point for the interpretation of campus
climate
• Helps inform and align campus policies to reflect inclusive
student experiences
8. Shifts in EDI Work
Trend shifts since 70’s Next Steps?
From stereotypes to patterns of
treatment
“Good one” to organizational change
Single issues to intersectionality
Silence to competence
More integrated social justice work
Outcomes central to practice
Developing Internal capacity for
systemic change
Top down, well integrated
9. • Broadened data = more nuanced
understanding
• Implications of self report
• Expressions of fear
• Role of Faculty
• Students data use expectations
Moving Forward
10. • Proximity to differences
• Demonstrated Action
• Appreciation
• Collective consciousness
• Make efforts more visible to students
Student Expectations
11. • ADA & Disabilities
• Accommodations
• Culture, norms & practices
• LGBTQ Identities
• Multiracial students in a mono-racial world
13. In Practice | Gender Identity
• Campuses using Presence
• Utilizing Gender identity
• Tracked involvement based on these
demographics
• Tailored engagement for marginalized LGBTQ
population
• Identified needs, improved retention
14. In Practice | Campus Climate Surveys
• Effectiveness of outcomes improves
with inclusive data as starting point
• Intersection of race, gender &
class
• Intersection of LGBTQ identities
and sexual violence
15. In Practice | Preferred Name Policies
• Following State of Oregon HEC lobby
- preferred names in Banner
• Several states have followed suite
• See example policies in handout
16. In Practice | Campus Inclusion Plan
• Tie data collection goals to
overarching inclusion plan,
• Metrics
• Accountability measures
18. Top 3
• Consistent collection of data at events
• Building a culture of inclusive assessment
• Access to assessment policies
• Data sharing
• Constant review & iteration
• Collaboration & integration with internal software & third
party vendors
20. Divisional Implementation
• Intersectionality trainings
• Identifying opportunities for expanded
demographics in admissions
• Strategic initiatives to increase diversity
and inclusion, add in goals and metrics
that focus on data collection
21. Campus Wide Implementation
• Preferred name policies
• Tracking consistent data processes from
applicant stages to alumni databases
• Partnering with academics - personalized
learning
• Expand data collection in campus climate plan
selection and development
23. Discussion Prompts
• Ethics surrounding practitioner use of data
• In what ways do you raise awareness around the importance of these
policies or practices on your campus?
• What trainings have you found effective around EDI and data usage
and analyzation? What gaps in training can you identify on your
campus?
• Integrity and responsibility of data utilization and reporting
• What are some of the effective ways your department trains employees
on effective data utilization and reporting?
• How can these trainings be improved?
24. References
• Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: a developmental theory. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25,
297-308.
• Barton, D. (2015). The most important factor in a college student’s success. blogs.wsj.com/experts/2015/09/16/the-
most-important-factor-in-a-college-students-success/
• Kuh, et al. (2006). What matters most to student success: a review of the literature.
• Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
• Milem, et al. (2005) Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective. https://www.aacu.org/sites/
default/files/files/mei/milem_et_al.pdf
• 2016-17 DLE Survey Changes http://www.heri.ucla.edu/PDFs/surveyAdmin/dle/2017/DLE-2017-Survey-
Changes.pdf
• Elliot, et. al. (2013) Institutional barriers to diversity change work in higher education. http://journals.sagepub.com/
doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244013489686
• Johnston, Sara (2015) Unequal Treatment or Uneven Consequence: A Content Analysis of Americans with
Disabilities Act Title I Disparate Impact Cases from 1992 – 2012 http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4938
• Obear, K (2012) Reflections on our practice as social justice educators: How far we have come, how far we need to
go http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=jctp
25. For More Information
• Handout URL for more copies:
• Inclusive Data Blogs/ Inclusivity
Page
Kayley Robsham
kayley@presence.io
@kayleyrobsham
Lindsay Murdock
lindsay@presence.io
@linds_murdock