7. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 7
WHY PERSONALIZED VEHICLES ARE MORE?
Lack of facilities
No option
Time consuming
Comfort level
Lack of integration
Absence of active
transport choices
Absence of side
walks
8. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 8
EXCERPTS FROM A SURVEY
“I have to travel between Basavanagudi
and Agara every day for work. There
aren’t direct buses to my office; I
change three buses to get
there and on my way back, I
usually have to take an auto as one or
the other connecting bus is never
available. If I am not allowed to take
my car, how do they expect me to get
home,” questions T. Rashmi, a marketing
professional from Bangalore.
9. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 9
EXCERPTS FROM A SURVEY
Father
Son
Dad I need
a bike for
going to
college
Why you
need bike?
You can go in
a bus.
10. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 10
EXCERPTS FROM A SURVEY
Father
Son
Time waste
and no time
to study
OH!!!!?????
Purchase
bike for
him????
16. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 16
Decision depends on the choices available
INFLUENCING DECISIONS ABOUT TRAVEL
Of India’s 360 million urban residents, nearly 150 million people live in urban slums.
150 million people
won’t think of these.
Opting available public
transportation
17. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 17
Measures to retain the public transport users and to increase
the percentage of people using sustainable transport users
URGENT NEED OF PROVIDING SUSTAINABLE
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
City Population (in
millions)
Mass
Transport
Bicycle
Other
modes
0.1–0.5 30–40 30–40 25–35
0.5–1.0 40–50 25–35 20–30
1.0–2.0 50–60 20–30 15–25
2.0–5.0 60–70 15–25 10–20
5.0+ 70–85 15–20 10–15
Desirable modal split for Indian cities (as percentage of total trips)
Source: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, New Delhi. 1998. Traffic and Transportation Policies and Strategies in Urban Areas in India.
18. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 18
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+
28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
NO RESPECT FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT
USERS
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+ 28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
Existing Modal Split in Indian Cities (as a % of Total Trips)
Source: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, New Delhi. 1998. Traffic and Transportation Policies and Strategies in Urban Areas in India.
Dreaming about
personalized
vehicle
21. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 21
ACCESS HIERARCHY
Hierarchy - based on the type of city road.
Ex: Transit > Pedestrian > Bicycle >Automobile -
along a major Transit Corridor
Typical Hierarchy
22. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 22
TRANSPORTATION CHOICES
Giving people a range of transportation choices .
Mobility choices are governed by the provided options
23. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 23
Better public transport facilities
Pleasure in walking
Pleasure in cycling
Overall integration
Parking for sustainable modes at stations
PROVIDING SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT
INFRASTRUCTURE
24. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 24
WHAT WE ACHIEVE?
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+ 28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
25. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 25
WHAT WE ACHIEVE?
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+ 28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
26. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 26
WHAT WE ACHIEVE?
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+ 28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
Stop dreaming
about
personalized
vehicle. Stick to
sustainable
modes
27. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 27
WHAT WE ACHIEVE?
City
Population
(in millions)
Walk
Mass
Transport
IPT
Car
Two
Wheeler
Bicycle
Fast Slow
0.10–0.25
37.1 16.4 10.4 20.1 3.3 24.1 25.7
0.25–0.50
37.8 20.6 8.9 17.2 2.6 29.8 20.9
0.50–1.0
30.7 25.4 8.2 12 9.5 29.1 15.9
1.0–2.0
29.6 30.6 6.4 8.1 3.3 39.6 12.1
2.0–5.0
28.7 42.3 4.9 3 5 28.9 15.9
5.0+ 28.4 62.8 3.3 3.7 6.1 14.8 9.4
Even these
people will think
of using public
transport
38. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 38
taking transport as an
opportunity to create
vibrant public spaces
thereby improving the
image and livability of
the city.
Transport Integration as Facelift for city Area
OVERALL APPROACH
39. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 39
TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION
Based on Accessibility – Multi Modal Level of Service (MLOS)
41. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 41
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR IMPROVING URBAN
TRANSPORT
Physical Integration
Fare Integration
Route Integration
Institutional Integration
Intelligent Transportation
System Integration
city as connected when citizens have peace of mind regarding mobility –
making transportation available so that every citizen in a country can be
present in the right place at the right time.
42. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 42
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR IMPROVING URBAN
TRANSPORT
city as connected when citizens have peace of mind regarding mobility –
making transportation available so that every citizen in a country can be
present in the right place at the right time.
43. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 43
Typical map - Route Rationalization and Integrated Public Transport
Service Plan.
44. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 44
Typical map – Before Route Rationalization
Typical map – After Route Rationalization
45. Urban Transport 28/01/2016 45
TRANSIT CORRIDOR PLANNING
Through the dense areas.
All Successful transit corridors are along the
dense areas of city.
Scope for Transit oriented development (TOD)