Comparing Gorgias And Socrates Rhetoric

Comparing Gorgias And Socrates Rhetoric
In Ancient Greece, it was a popular activity for citizens to go and listen to speeches given by
professional orators. This common practice is also known as rhetoric, and was an important part of
education for the Greeks. It allowed politicians and others who needed to speak publicly the
opportunity to persuade audiences effectively. As with every good thing, there is the opportunity to
corrupt it or misuse it and that is what Socrates questions in much of the dialogue Gorgias. The
concept of oratory is not completely agreed upon in the discussion between Gorgias and Socrates.
This dialogue opens after the orator Gorgias gives a speech and Socrates asks some of his friends if
he would engage in a conversation. Gorgias obliged and wanted to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Gorgias agrees with Socrates that persuasion is about teaching, and can be used in the courts which
involve the concepts of justice and injustice. Socrates continues to ask many questions like the
difference between knowledge and belief. There must be a type of persuasion that produces
knowledge and belief, Gorgias agreed and said that oratory brings about belief. Socrates then tries to
define an orator as a persuader for the belief, not between matters or right and wrong. Gorgias
agreed
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Plato's The Gorgias: Rhetoric
The Gorgias written by Plato is a book about rhetoric being questioned as being The greatest art, and
also about good and evil in political events. It can be argued that the World that we live in today is
so corrupted that the issue of good and evil doesn't matter any more in political activities. It is all
about what is best for the community, city or country and anything will be said or done, whether it is
good or evil to achieve what is required for the society to prosper. The art of Rhetoric has to do with
persuasion and if one can be persuaded into giving you what you want or desire you are said to be a
rhetoric. The arguments that Plato made in Gorgias all have to deal with the problems that we are
facing in the 21st century. The main

Rhetoric In Gorgias By Socrates
Gorgias is a Socratic dialogue that aims to determine what rhetoric truly is. Socrates seeks the true
definition of rhetoric, attempting to pinpoint the essence of rhetoric and unveil the flaws of the
sophistic oratory popular in Athens at this time. The art of persuasion was widely considered
necessary for political and legal advantage in classical Athens, and rhetoricians promoted
themselves as teachers of this fundamental skill. Some, like Gorgias, were foreigners attracted to
Athens because of its reputation for intellectual and cultural sophistication. In Gorgias, Socrates
argues that philosophy is an art, whereas rhetoric is a skill based on mere experience. To Socrates,
most rhetoric in practice is merely flattery. In examining the role advertising plays in our ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rhetoric for polus is power. Polus is defeated by that of Socrates as well as his own words being
used against him. As Socrates argues that rhetors have no power in the city due to the meaning and
idea of relating power to committing just acts, this upsets Polus as he feels that Rhetoricians obtain
much. It is from here that Gorgias outlines rhetoric as a set of techniques and devices. Polus studied
rhetoric for its ability to get high on a social class level. Socrates points out that power is doing what
is good for one's soul. If rhetoric promotes unjust things and doing bad for your soul, then your are
powerless. The notion that one must have knowledge in order to have power guides Socrates in his
arguments against polus in that sure, Rhetoricians have knowledge, however Polus is forced to
accept that Rhetors enable unjust punishments for those before the courts who commit unjust acts to
get their in the first place. In this conversation, Socrates describes rhetoric as an experience in
contrast to Polus's rhetoric view–power. That experience is difficult to describe as it can be an
experience of many

Compare And Contrast Callicles And Gorgias
Callicles in Gorgias argues that what makes life better and worth living is constant pleasure. He
claims that self–control is a human weakness because people should be constantly attempting to
fulfill their desires. Callicles brings up an example of a person who inherited a wealth being held
back from their happiness due to self–control. He believes that it would be a waste for the person to
attempt to control his urges by putting himself under a master and by not doing what he pleases. He
argues that now that this person is vastly wealthy, the best thing to do for his happiness would be to
fulfill all his desires. Socrates rebuts by arguing that pleasure and good do not necessarily go hand in
hand. He suggests that people can feel pleasure

Gorgias: A Detailed Study Of Virtue
Gorgias is a detailed study of virtue founded upon an inquiry into the nature of rhetoric, art, power,
temperance, justice, and good versus evil. As such, the dialogue both maintains independent
significance and relates closely to Plato's overarching philosophical project of defining noble and
proper human existence. It exists in the form of a mostly friendly (though at times scathing)
conversation between Socrates and four fellow citizens. Chaerephon, an apparent contemporary of
Socrates, is found speaking with Plato's teacher at the beginning of the dialogue, yet says little else
throughout the conversation. Callicles, another of Socrates's peers (and here his harshest insulter),
plays host to Gorgias as well as opponent to Socrates near ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Socrates describes virtue of the body (through gymnastics and medicine) as well as of the soul
(through temperance and justice). Interestingly, Socrates's response here smacks of rhetoric and
oration more than of dialogue, and his tone takes on a passion and urgency unusual even for him.
This intense passion suggests the vital significance for him (and thus for Plato) of the topics in
focus. The mythology of death Socrates relates at the dialogue's conclusion illustrates the
importance of virtue both in this world and beyond.
Philosophical Themes, Arguments, Ideas
Art
Throughout this dialogue, as well as in many of Plato's other works, the notion of artful pursuits
comes up rather frequently. Essentially, an art is a skill directed towards some form of the good and
intended for the benefit of those practicing and/or those on whom a particular art is practiced. In this
sense for example, medicine is an art because it aims at improving the physical health of those for
whom a specific treatment is prescribed, while serving alcohol is not as it creates a deceptive
impression of physical health grounded in the bodily pleasure of intoxication. In Gorgias, Socrates
first mentions the notion of art as part of an inquiry into the nature of rhetoric. In

Importance Of Rhetoric In Gorgias
Rhetoric is a form of persuasive communication. It's a way to inform an audience of knowledge and
doesn't necessarily have to come from an expert source. Rhetoric is often used to persuade
individuals to believe that a speaker's knowledge is credible. In Gorgias, Socrates is a self–righteous
individual who has always questioned everything. Its meant for him and others to distinguish pure
knowledge from ignorance itself. Gorgias, on the other hand, is a naive individual and claims he has
the ability to answer any given question he has come across. Throughout the story, Socrates uses his
knowledge of Rhetoric to prove how Gorgias lacks his experience and knowledge. He often appeals
to the crowd to help convey his point of view. With Socrates being the person he is, it shows to the
audience that he has the strong belief in his own actions and knows when others are either right or
wrong. The crowd watching the debate is important because, in the end, they're going to support the
individual with the better argument. Having a connection with the audience does provide Socrates
with enough leverage to seem superior to Gorgias. Socrates appeal to the crowd helps him gain an
advantage in the debate because unlike Gorgias, Socrates uses his knowledge of philosophy and
rhetoric to control the speech. Socrates ability to appeal to the crowd is a strong advantage due to his
status as a well–known philosopher. He has been known to always try to prove people wrong. He
tends to question

Gorgias Essay
Gorgias
In Gorgias we have a conversation between Socrates, Gorgias, and Polus, Gorgias' young assistant.
They speak on the matters of rhetoric, knowledge, and whether injustice and suffering is better to do
or have done onto you. While conventional wisdom tells us that it is better to inflict suffering than to
receive it, Socrates argues that it is completely the opposite. Part of Socrates view is that moral
goodness is connected with knowledge, and that morally it is better to receive suffering than inflict
it. The argument begins with Polus telling Socrates that rhetoric and oratory can give you great
power and high regard. He likens their position to tyrants who do what they see fit. To this Socrates
says, " I say, Polus, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We do what we see fit to pursue the good or the better for ourselves. If we put someone to death we
do so because we believe it is beneficial. Now if having great power and doing what you see fit are
means to get to the ends which is the ultimate good, than by killing someone and inflicting more
suffering on them than yourself it is actually an abuse of power by using it without intelligence. If
intelligent use of power is always for the good and by putting someone to death it is actually worse,
aren't we really doing something that we do not want to do because it is not the better? At the same
time we are doing something that we see fit, we are actually not doing what we want to do because
the outcome is not the good but the bad. Socrates says that, "Can such a man possibly have great
power in that city, if in fact having great power is, as you agree, something good?"
Polus can't believe this claim and asks Socrates why it is that he would rather suffer injustice than
inflict it. Socrates says that he believes that, "...doing what's unjust is actually the greatest of evils."
If we are going too morally suffer for deeds that we saw fit, it is actually worse than suffering at the
hands of someone else. By inflicting injustice on others we do not use our power intelligently and
morally hurt ourselves, and therefore are

Compare And Contrast Plato's Gorgias
Plato's Gorgias is a discussion of debate among Socrates and his fellow sophists concerning the
natures of topics such as art, rhetoric, justice, pleasure, good, and evil. In one section of the dialogue
between Callicles and Socrates, the former argues that the good life is the equivalent of a life
focused on experiencing pleasure. However, Socrates refutes Callicles' conclusion with two
arguments fueled with detailed logic, both of which inevitably arrive at the conclusion that good and
pleasant are not interchangeable with one another. To begin with, Socrates confirms Callicles'
assumption that good and pleasant are equals (495d). He follows this by employing an ongoing
metaphor in order to generate a relatable circumstance to swing the argument to his favor: a
comparison of states of good and pleasure versus bad and pain to health and sickness. Callicles
confirms each statement that Socrates logistically describes, inevitably leading to his agreement
with the undeniable conclusion that health and illness cannot exist in an individual at the same time
(496b–c). Socrates' next comparison forces both him and Callicles to concur that one can feel
pleasure and pain simultaneously in that although one who feels thirst is in pain, the person feels
pleasure while drinking (496e). Yet, they also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This logic circles back and refutes Callicles' original idea by proving that feeling pleasure does not
parallel doing well and feeling pain does not parallel doing badly because

Plato's Gorgia
I.
The underlying explanation for the apparent discrepancy between the character Socrates' stance on
politics in Plato's Gorgias – that he is amongst the few that practice true politics (Gorg. 521 D) – and
his stance in Plato's Apology – that he does not practice what is often viewed as politics (Ap. 31 E) –
is reliant upon the subtle distinction that Socrates makes between those two fields; between what
politics truly is and the art of politics as it is commonly practiced. Further, this distinction itself is
heavily reliant upon the role of ῥητορικός, or lack thereof, in the art of common politics and in the
practicing of politics itself. This is made quite clear in the Gorgias.
Throughout the διάλογος, Socrates repeatedly questions Gorgias ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
30 C–31 D). Socrates presents his own actions as beholden to only the truth and benefit of the πόλις,
which aligns with his description of true politics, and is diametrically opposed to his description of
common politics, from the Gorgias. Through his actions – chiefly through exposing the ignorance of
fellow Athenians, and especially politicians (Ap. 21 C–22 C) – Socrates attempts to practice this
form of true politics by seeking to benefit the people, despite the people clearly finding his actions
unpleasant.
This is ironically further evidenced by the circumstances surrounding the trial of Socrates. Athenians
who practice ῥητορικός and, thus, a semblance of politics rather than the thing itself, brought forth
to trial a man who claimed to not practice ῥητορικός but, rather, to practice true politics. The
politicians – as peddlers of the pleasant – tried and sentenced to death a man who brought actual
benefit but also unpleasantness to the city, rather than the perceived but lacking benefit that the
politicians

Gorgias ' Encomium Of Helen
Gorgias' Encomium of Helen is a beautiful, short, though enigmatic, speech that demonstrates
sophist, Gorgias' mastery of the art of rhetoric. In this speech, Gorgias attempts to accomplish two
important tasks. One, by presenting a reasoned argument to his audiences, Gorgias tries to lift the
blame off of Helen for causing the Trojan War. Two, by demonstrating his mastery of the art of
rhetoric, Gorgias attempts to attract future consumers of his teaching of the art of rhetoric. This
might also be very likely given that Gorgias is a sophist that traveled from one city to another
looking for students that will purchase his ability to teach them rhetoric. Sophists were needed in
Greek cities as they provided education in public speaking, a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Gorgias' reasoned argument states the following:
1. There are four causes: Fate/Gods, rape, persuasive speech, and love which might have caused
Helen to pursue her journey to Troy.
2. If it is Fate or Gods that is the cause, then Helen is innocent.
3. If it is rape that is the cause, then Helen is innocent.
4. If it is persuasive speech that is the cause, then Helen is innocent.
5. If it is love that is the cause, then Helen is innocent.
Therefore,
6. Helen is innocent.
Gorgias' reasoned argument is a valid argument because the conclusion follows the premises.
However, as he attempts to demonstrate the third cause where a speech might have seduced Helen to
attempt to do wrong, it might seem that Gorgias falls into inconsistency. For example, at section 11
Gorgias claims that, "All who have and do persuade people of things do so by molding a false
argument." One might question this statement and conclude that Gorgias is being inconsistent about
his art of rhetoric because at the beginning of the speech he claimed that speech is used to deliver
the truth but now it is about false argumentation. However, I will argue that Gorgias is not being
inconsistent. In the section where he is arguing that Helen might have been persuaded through
speech, Gorgias is being very careful to draw a line between different categorizations of speech. For
Gorgias, all persuasion is speech but not all speech is persuasion.

Callicles
Question Selection: Write an essay on Callicles' views, as espoused in Plato's "Gorgias". Explain
what these views are; explain how Socrates tries to counter them; and give your own assessment of
the dialogue between the two.
With reference to Plato's work entitled Gorgias, this essay will provide a short background to the
dialogue, provide a synopsis of the points put forward by Callicles and how Socrates refutes those
claims, ending with a final assessment of the dialogue in completion. 'War and Battle' are the
opening words of the Gorgias. Voegelin believes this to be a battle for the soul of the younger
generation. 'Who will form the future leaders of the polity: the rhetor who teaches the tricks of
political success, or the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates' second argument is an attempt to show that Callicles admiration of courageous men is
inconsistent with the view that all pleasures are good regardless of their source or the character of
those who experience them. Socrates provides the example of cowards in war, who are pained by
the advance of the enemy and rejoice upon their retreat by at least as much as the courageous
(498a5–ca). Therefore if pleasure is good then the coward who is happy by the enemy's retreat is as
good as the courageous, something which Callicles doesn't want to portray as he believes the
cowardly and foolish are bad. In the end Callicles is forced to admit a distinction between good and
bad pleasures and this distinction in turn allows Socrates to condemn contemporary Athenian
politicians for ministering to the pleasures rather than the welfare of their people. From that point on
Callicles so disgusted by the outcome only replies to Socrates in a formal manner thereby allowing
Socrates to engage in a lengthy monologue in which the choice between philosophy and a public life
is examined in the light of conclusions already established.9 Socrates argues that contemporary
statesman are like poets pandering to the pleasures of the masses however Callicles thinks this only
sensible for the '"leviathan" will kill you if you don't humour it.'10 Callicles may well have been
right in asserting that Socrates would be at the mercy of anyone who chooses to kill or injure him
however immunity from

Plato 's Argument Of Pain And Pleasure
Rhetoric is an art form created before the reign of Gorgias, by Aristotle. As time progressed
throughout the ages, Aristotle taught the art of rhetoric to his student Socrates, who eventually
taught it to Plato. The art gradually adapted into the rhetoric we use today, providing the reason as to
why Plato chooses to recreate the account of Socrates and Gorgias' discussion. Plato shows us how
Socrates' knowledge of proper usage of rhetoric is vaster than that of Gorgias'. He helps us visualize
the various ways he uses rhetoric, to provide the reason for his ability to use rhetoric better than the
other Orators. This is illuminated by Socrates' use of pathos, in his argument of pain and pleasure,
the use of ethos in speaking about the comparison of medicine and gymnastics, and his use of logos
in his debate on the body and soul. Plato places special consideration into choosing the topics he
highlights in the story because of Socrates innate ability to refute these topics the way does.
Socrates' rhetoric in the argument of pain versus pleasure stems from his desire to actually make the
audience understand his argument through emotions; he wants to make them grow a better
understanding of the difference between pain and pleasure and show him how the proper use of
rhetoric can impact rather than just persuade. Throughout Gorgias, Socrates makes it a point to
attack Gorgias' position as an orator by asking questions about the true meaning of his craft, like
when he states "Then

Plato And Aristotle 's Views On Plato 's Philosophy
–INTRO: Plato and Aristotle are two of the most influential Greek philosophers of history. It would
be just to say that Plato's philosophical views were greatly influenced by his mentor, Socrates. Over
time, Aristotle found solemn in Plato's teachings and became his pupil. The philosophical theories
that were originally conceived by Socrates passed from Plato, to Aristotle. In a perfect world, it
would be nice to entertain the belief that Aristotle's beliefs resembled his mentor, Plato's and Plato's
mentor, Socrates. However, this is farthest from the truth.
–SUMMARY OF PLATO GORGIAS: Gorgias is a dialogue text written by Plato, in which Gorgias,
a Sicilian philosopher, orator, and rhetorician is in opposition to the beliefs of Plato's mentor,
Socrates. The exchanged begins following Gorgias's speech at an exhibition. Socrates was offered to
question Gorgias for as long as he pleased, for he wanted to "hear from him what is the nature of his
art, and what it is which he professes and teaches". Socrates begins by asking Gorgias what he and
rhetoric is, to which he responds in a smooth, sophisticated manner, avoiding the questions entirely.
He referred to rhetoric as an art. Although Gorgias avidly practiced rhetoric, he was not compelling
when answering Socrates's questions. Instead, he provided short responses. Socrates did not view
rhetoric as an art. However, he was utilizing this 'art' when asking Gorgias questions. His mission
was to persuade the speakers at this

Elenchus and Socrates
Mark Abby
PHL 414 Plato
Mid–Term
February 20, 2012
The phrase "Socratic method" gets tossed around quite a bit during the course of a liberal arts
education. One way of describing this method is teaching by means of asking. The thought is that by
asking questions, a teacher may trigger some thought in the student's mind which comes about more
organically and effectively than by the means of traditional lecture. Employing the Socratic method
allows a teacher to guide a student's train of thought toward a particular goal, and use of the method
requires on the part of the teacher both a keen understanding of psychology and a clear idea as to
where the line of questioning is intended to lead. The latter part of that statement becomes ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It seems clear to me that the elenchus is a negative method of philosophical inquiry. It does nothing
to establish new avenues toward knowledge, but instead merely serves to refute false claims and
point out underdeveloped assertions regarding knowledge. At no point in the dialogues does
Socrates attempt to make his own claims about any knowledge or virtue. He only picks apart the
claims of the interlocutors. This criticism of the elenchus is shared by Gregory Vlastos, who
believes that the elenchus does not aim to prove anything to be true, but only that certain things are
untrue. According to Vlastos' view, the elenchus serves to prove the refutation of a premise is valid
because the negation of said premise can be found somewhere within the beliefs of the holder of that
premise. However, Socrates' use of the elenchus merely shows that the interlocutor holds an
inconsistent premise set. (If the interlocutor begins by accepting P, and then Socrates gets the
interlocutor to also agree to Q and R, then Socrates holds that not–P must be the case. The logical
problem lies in that Q and R are ad–hoc, and nothing inherent within them necessitates the negation
of the original P). We can see Socrates' use of the elenchus, and consider Vlastos' criticism of it, by
examining the initial elenchai in two dialogues, the Euthyphro and the Gorgias (each dialogue
contains multiple uses of the elenchus, but for the scope of this

Gorgias Rhetoric In The Encomium of Helen Essay
In the Encomium of Helen, Gorgias attempts to prove Helen's innocence since she is blamed to be
the cause of the Trojan War. Gorgias uses rhetoric to persuade listeners to believe why there are only
four reasons to explain why Helen was driven to Troy. All of which he will argue were not her fault.
Fate was the first cause, followed by force. Gorgias then seems to focus the most on the power of
Logos, or words. Finally he explains how she could have been compelled by love (82B116).
I will assume Fate was pretty explanatory when Gorgias wrote the Encomium of Helen since he
does not delve deep into his reasons like he later does for Logos. He mentions that a human cannot
obstruct ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gorgias goes on to explain three different occupations that use Logos to gain acceptance of
opinions. Ultimately, Gorgias finishes comparing Logos to the effects of a drug (Freeman).
Gorgias argues that speech or Logos can achieve many marvelous achievements by the means of the
smallest form. Logos "can even put a stop to fear, remove grief, create joy, and increase pity"
(Freeman). Gorgias continues by trying to prove the power of Logos.
Poetry is a form of Logos. Gorgias defines poetry as speech in meter. Since speech causes many
things like he explained before, then poetry must be speech in meter because it can cause the listener
to "shudder in terror, shed tears in pity, and yearn with sad longing" (Freeman). Through this poetry,
the hearer's soul will begin to feel the same way (82B119).
Wizardry and witchcraft are another way Logos can be used. Special incantations can bring pleasure
and also avert grief. These incantations can unite with the soul, persuade, and then change it with
witchcraft (82B1110). Gorgias says that two types of witchcraft have been invented. One is through
the errors of the soul. The other is from deceptions in the mind (Freeman).
Persuasion through lies is another way Gorgias says Logos can be used. He says that if everyone
remembered everything in the past, knowledge of the present, and

Plato's Gorgias: The Art Of Rhetoric
Plato's Gorgias is a dialogue that was written by Plato around 380 BC. In this dialogue, Plato writes
about Socrates and shows the reader many different encounters Socrates has with other
philosophers. Socrates tries to find the meaning of many different things. Some of these things
include, the true definition of rhetoric, trying to find the spirit of rhetoric, the art of persuasion,
nature vs. convention, pleasure as fulfilment as well as uncovering the many flaws in sophistic
oratory. The art of persuasion was something that was very popular in Athens around this time.
Many different people used the art of persuasion and saw it as something that was necessary when
dealing with politics. Persuasive speaking was something that was common among many different
rhetoricians, and that is why many of them were at the front of politics in this time. They knew how
to persuade people, and how to make people believe in what they were saying. Rhetoricians are the
people that mainly advocated themselves as teachers of this skill, but what Socrates argues is that
philosophy is an art, while rhetoric is a knack. An orator can also use persuasive speaking to help
people believe in what they are trying to say. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this section Socrates and Polus start to debate about if oratory can be considered an art. Polus
begins by asking Socrates what craft oratory is, and the dialogue then continues with: "SOCRATES:
To tell you the truth, Polus, I don't think it's craft at all.
POLUS: Well then, what do you think oratory is?
SOCRATES: In the treatise that I read recently, it's the thing that you say had produced

Socrates And Sophists
Merriam–Webster's dictionary defines a Sophist as "any of a class of ancient Greek teachers of
rhetoric, philosophy, and the art of successful living prominent about the middle of the fifth century
B.C. for their adroit subtle and allegedly often specious reasoning," meaning that they were subtle in
their language and their reasoning was often filled with fallacies. The Sophists were rhetoricians;
speakers and orators concerned with winning the hearts and ears of their people, much like a
politician. Plato (427–347 B.C.) deals greatly with the ideas of sophists in his writings, particularly
Gorgias, Protagoras and The Republic, through the idealized character Socrates. Plato was not a
Sophist, nor was he a rhetorician. He was a logistician and geometer, concerned, not with persuasion
and followers, but with Truth and its methodical pursuit. This put him at odds with many of the
Sophists, who often shunned the truth to gain popularity and who often created flawed morals and
skewed senses of Justice based on this basic lack of Truth. Three main Sophists of Plato's and
Socrates' days were Gorgias, Thrasymachus and Protagoras. Each one had his own ideas which were
dangerous to society because of their lack of a base in Truth, and Socrates and Plato fought the ideas
of each heartily. But what was so dangerous about the ideas of the sophists? Each one was different.
For Gorgias, he attempted to destroy the idea of Reality with his philosophy on non–existence.

Rhetoric In Socrates The Gorgias
The Gorgias is a dialogue in which Socrates expresses his ideas with others about rhetoric. From the
dialogue, it can be argued that the philosopher is a mortal enemy of rhetoric. He condemns it on
ethical and epistemic grounds. Socrates argues that rhetoric is not a real knowledge because it is not
a legitimate art, and that the teachers of rhetoric are nothing but fraudsters. In addition, he asserts
that rhetoric is ethically bankrupt and its main objective is to gratify the ignorant and enhance its
experts' power to practice it. It tends to manipulate ignorant individuals into believing on
imaginative things. Therefore, Socrates argues that it is not real art, because a real art should depict
a purified rationalism and knowledge that maintains the changeless good. As a result, Socrates
draws a sharp line between rhetoric and real art or knowledge.
In his argument with Polus, Socrates seems to provide a level ground for both charges against
rhetoric. Socrates asserts that rhetoric is an emperia and a knack based experience. It is a piece of
flattery whose objective is to gratify and provide pleasure, and that it degenerates ethically (Pratt,
2015). According to Socrates, rhetoric is not part of art. Instead, he refers to it as a flattery giving
four reasons ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, rhetoric has no regard to the genuine interest of men (Pratt, 2015). Rhetoric continues to
make pleasure as the bait of innocent and deceives them to believe that rhetoric has the highest
value. According Socrates, cookery pretends to depict an understanding of the kind of food
appropriate for the body. Supposing that the cook and physician are engaged into a competition
regarding the understanding of best and the worst of food with children of men with little
understanding as the judges, the physician would starve (Sutton,

Why Were The Slandered Sophists Fair?
The Slandered Sophists
The Sophists were a group of people almost universally understood as wicked "teachers" with a
forte for corrupting and perverting the proper teachings of Greek rhetoric. In fact, the term sophism
today means "A specious argument for displaying ingenuity in reasoning or for deceiving someone."
As well as "Any false argument; fallacy." ("Sophism") This reputation comes primarily from the
teachings of Plato, who wrote Gorgias; a work detailing his own arguments against the sophists' way
of thinking. However, a question of Plato's fairness can be raised. Were the portrayals of the sophists
fair? In this essay I will be going through what current information we have accepted about the
Sophists and how they are portrayed by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the term "Sophist" referred to any person accepting money for teaching, some Sophists are
mentioned in modern philosophy as having legitimate concepts attached to their teachings. Antiphon
was one such Sophist who taught rhetoric. In discourse of political ideology, he is considered
important due to his teachings on the system of egalitarianism. Other Sophists with achievements of
note were Hippias, who was also a famous historian and creator of the quadratrix (a mathematics
term). There was also Prodicus, who served as an ambassador and had important discussions about
the meaning of words. () As far as the Sophists go, it appears that Plato did plenty to discredit them
with Gorgias. While many of them were sure to teach incorrectly, it appears others had legitimate
contributions to society in general and such, were misrepresented in Plato's works. One could argue
that some of these advancements came without the use of the Sophistic rhetoric. However, many
claims about the Sophists seem to be judgements of character as opposed to judgements of concrete

Women In Gorgias's Encomium Of Helen
In western society, women are encouraged to dress and act in a conservative manner. If a woman is
attacked and was wearing something even slightly provocative comments will ensue that blame the
woman. "She should not have been wearing that," "She was asking for it," and so many more will be
thrown at this woman. The perpetrator slinks farther away from the blame, while the survivor gets
the blame shoved at her. This is not a fair system, but it is what happens today because it has always
happened. In Gorgias's Encomium of Helen, despite his efforts to defend Helen, Gorgias blames
Helen for what happened. Through the power hierarchies in western society victims voices are
silenced this is present in Steubenville rape case as well the Encomium of Helen. The physical
appearance of women plays a huge role in how they are perceived by the world they live in. When
Gorgias talks about Helen, he does so in a way that sheds a negative light on her. This negative light
is especially apparent when he says, "In many did she work much ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This problem is rooted in childhood. The old adage "boys will be boys" gets thrown around a lot as
one is growing up. This old adage could be sending the message to young boys that they can get
away with more because of their gender. However, young girls are constantly corrected and
encouraged to be more lady–like, and in the process their voices become silenced. Boys and men
alike are not reprimanded as often as women, this is apparent throughout life and in sexual
situations. During the Steubenville rape case, the media's sympathies went out to the boys because
the whole incident was a misunderstanding and Mays and Richmond were just "boys being boys".
Gorgias blames Helen for the misfortune that happened to their country, just like the media blamed
the 16 year old girl for what she made these two star football players and good students give

The Flaws In Gorgias Encomium Of Helen
The Encomium of Helen, written by the Gorgias, is a very significant piece regarding Greek classic
literature in which he argues Helen of Troy's innocence from the blame placed on her by society
when she allegedly committed adultery. Throughout the piece, Gorgias uses his "philosophical"
perspective to pinpoint how every motive she could have had liberated her from any blame. This
piece came in a period in which many philosophers catalogued Gorgias as a sophist, or someone
who has no true wisdom and argues for the sake of winning and not to share knowledge. Throughout
this analyzation, I will proceed to explain the flaws in Gorgias' Encomium of Helen, as well as the
purpose in choosing this piece instead of the other literature pieces. Helen, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
His style is definitely appealing because it is bold and reflects some experience with abstract
concepts such as justice and praise. The word choice is direct and unambiguous. In my opinion
Gorgias' thematic in expressing the nature of his thoughts regarding Helen's position in the situation
was strategically ordered in a way that seemed to have validity but can also be interpreted as
contradictory. The Encomium of Helen was written to persuade from all pathos, ethos, as well as the
logical approach; however, Gorgias left many gaps in his defense that when analyzed meticulously
makes his argument seem questionable and weak. If one places blame on Fate and God like he
initially stated, then his argument would be based on a complete abstract since there is no concrete
evidence of the existence of the will of divinity other than those who believe in it. Helen is the
daughter of a god, but the fact that there are gods does not entirely prove how the will of the gods
can take over Helen entirely. A skeptical perspective could have deducted Helen could have easily
attributed her actions to Fate without this being the case. Therefore, the complexity in proving this
theory does not completely satisfy the purpose of finding her innocent and in contrast can make
Helen seem opportunistic at taking advantage of her role in society to satisfy her dishonest instincts.
Gorgias' reasoning would have not been able to convince skeptics because the reasoning is
subjective and

Rhetoric: Socrates Vs. Gorgias
Socrates vs. Gorgias
There are many definitions of rhetoric and an argument for each angle. In Gorgias we are able to
view two very different interpretations of the word. Socrates challenges Gorgias in his expertise and
draws his own rendition of the word. While Gorgias teaches what he believes the word means,
Socrates picks out every point and questions it in order to create his own understanding of it.
Gorgias is a self proclaimed rhetorician who believes that it is a valuable skill set or techne. He
explains it as an act used to persuade others to do what you want them to do or what they should do.
This can be especially used in a political sense and focuses on the end result of agreeing with the
rhetorician rather than what is right and what is wrong. A rhetorician is not suppose to be held
responsible for the use of the rhetoric they pass on. They can teach a person what it is and they
chose what to do with it next. In Gorgias' view it has nothing to do with validity or the truth, only
with getting people to go along with what you're saying. Persuasion leads to submission, therefore
gives you power over others. With this power one has undeniable freedom and control over people.
This can be viewed as excellence or virtue (arete) and is seen as a sort of expertise. In Athens power
like this is directly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates overall views rhetoric as a form of flattery. It is not something that you can learn to do or
use knowledge to get better at. It's something you just know to do from mere experience rather than
expertise. In a more defined sense, flattery is being good at creating your desired effect by bringing
people pleasure. If you can make people feel good about themselves than you have power and can
manipulate people. He believes that rhetoric appeals to people and confirms things that they have
already thought about, therefore giving them confirmation in their

Gorgias Summary
In the Gorgias reading, oratory is an art of persuasion. Notably Socrates is in search of that
knowledge, knowledge of what oratory truly is. He then approaches Gorgias, an orator himself, and
questions him about his teachings and practices. During the conversation both Gorgias and Socrates
engage in, many flaws are revealed in Gorgias beliefs and understandings of his teachings as
Socrates conducts his questions around the actual functions of oratory. In the beginning of their
discussion, Gorgias states that "in the case of oratory, on the other hand, there isn't any such manual
work. Its activity and influence depend entirely on speeches. That's the reason I consider the craft of
oratory to be concerned with speeches" (796). Meaning that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, Gorgias provided answers to these questions by stating that he is able to turn his
followers into orators and that even if they did not possess the knowledge he would teach his
students about all the subjects. Gorgias also believed that an orator was always just. In spite of that,
Socrates was able to contradict Gorgias with his previous statements by saying " if an orator uses his
oratorical skill unjustly we shouldn't complain against his teacher or banish him from the city, but do
so to the one who does what's unjust, the one who doesn't use his oratorical skill properly?" (805).
Gorgias agreed with Socrates statement even after Gorgias said that an orator would always speak
the truth and be just, meaning that even the student would not use his learnings for injustices
reasons. "I took it that oratory would never be an unjust thing, since it always makes its speeches
about justice. But when a little later you were saying that the orator could also use oratory unjustly, I
was surprised and thought that your statements weren't consistent" (805) with this section of the
conversation Socrates left Gorgias mute and his student Polus stepped in to back up

Socrates And Socrate
Gorgias invites Socrate to the party of an unknown person's house to show off his knowledge and
sees how much Socrate knows as Gorgias brags about how rhetoric is something he have a good
knowledge of. Socrate may be prepared to battle against the rhetoric and finds a way to defeat
Gorgias in the competition. Socrates first arrives late the competition in front of the crowd of people
in the party to show his opponent his disrespect. Socrate blames his friend Chaerephon of being late
to the party because he didn't want others to know that he is doing it purposely. Before Gorgias
shows up Socrates has a conversation with Gorgias' student Callicles. Callicles claims that Gorgias
can answer any questions are being asked. As Socrate finds a way

Plato's Gorgias: Where Does Socrates Go Wrong?
Topic 1: Where does Socrates go wrong?
Introduction
Plato's Gorgias is a detailed study of virtue in relation to the nature of rhetoric, art, power,
temperance, justice, and good versus evil. It is a dialogue between Socrates and four fellow citizens:
Chaerephon who is a friend of Socrates; Callicles who is another one of Socrates's peers as well as
one of his critics in this dialogue; Gorgias who is the famous orator and Polus who is Gorgias's
inexperienced but enthusiastic student. Although this is a fictitious dialogue, Socrates was Plato's
real teacher and the views expressed by Socrates in the dialogue should be seen as Plato's own
views. Personally, I think that Socrates position is flawless in this dialogue. However, there are some
criticisms ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The rhetorician makes the audience feel worthy because they can identify with his argument. They
can identify with the rhetoricians argument because the rhetorician is telling them what they want to
hear. After all, those skilled in rhetoric are ultimately skilled in the 'art' of persuasion. In order to
persuade someone to agree with your viewpoint you generally need to get them to identify with
what you are saying and possibly only tell them things they want to hear. Therefore, the audience
isn't getting the pure unadulterated truth that justice requires. Those skilled in rhetoric are not always
knowledgeable with regard to the topics that they give speeches on. Lack of knowledge can lead to
false information being distributed to the public. That is unjust. Socrates discusses the morality of
rhetoric with Gorgias, asking him directly if rhetoric is just. Socrates catches the incongruity in
Gorgias statements: "well, at the time you said that, I took it that oratory would never be an unjust
thing, since it always makes its speeches about justice. But when a little later you were saying that
the orator could also use oratory unjustly, I was surprised and thought that your statements weren't
consistent." Socrates believes that rhetoric alone is not a moral endeavor. Gorgias is criticized
because, "he would teach anyone who came to him wanting to learn oratory but without expertise in
what's

Gorgias: Rhetoric Analysis
Throughout this dialog, and also in a significant number of Plato's other works, the idea of artful
interests comes up frequently. Basically, art is an expertise coordinated towards some and meant for
the advantage of those performing the art. In Gorgias, Socrates first specifies the thought of art as a
major aspect of an exploration into the way of rhetoric. In examining this subject, he recognizes
genuine arts and false ones which make an inaccurate impression of good. This distinction turns out
to be progressively pertinent as the dialog continues, since Socrates affirms that the majority of his
contemporary Greeks and Athenians have been driven off track from the path of virtue because of
the fact that they confuse false situations of delight for genuine arts. The essence of power
encapsulates an idea vital both in Gorgias and Plato's philosophical convictions. Plato takes
incredible consideration to expose this point. From one end, Socrates contends, the individuals who
rule over others should regularly perform activities they don't prefer, to give them ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Evil flourishes in wrongful acts. This position is argued in Gorgias by Socrates, however alternate
members in the discussion concur with him as well. Dissension occurs rather with the dialog of what
is the greatest evil, or which is "more regrettable": "I believe I said in the earlier discussion that
committing injustice is worse than suffering it" (e.g. 473a). From one perspective, Socrates'
adversaries (mostly Polus and Callicles) express that suffering wrongdoing is more awful, since it
puts the sufferer in a position of torment and oppression to the inflictor. Alternatively, Socrates
sustains that perpetuating wrongdoing is more regrettable, since it is more despicable and in this
way more evil. He goes on to proclaim it more regrettable still to cause wrong without being
punished, since requital for an evil act in any event helps right the

Socrates And Gorgias
Plato's Gorgias is a stimulating, and at times inconsequential dialogue in that the interactions are at
times full of antagonism, unbending divergence, and misunderstanding. The spat between
philosophy and rhetoric shows itself as an unattractive street–fight in the Gorgias. Socrates was
seemingly rather concerned with discussion as a means of reaching the very best possible version of
the truth, as one can see throughout his early questioning of both Gorgias and Polus, but this does
not necessarily mean that his methods are just. In Gorgias, Socrates is out to criticize some form of
hedonism – the pursuit of pleasure, although it is not obvious at first. His attack; however, consisted
of two arguments: one attempting to show that pleasure ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the dialogue, both Callicles and Socrates come to an agreement that pleasure and goodness are
not the same (506c–507c).
Socrates arguments against Callicles are not the easiest to comprehend at first glance, one must
understand that the issue between the two philosophers is that of the nature of pleasure. To fully
encompass this issue, let us divert back to the beginning of the dialogue when Socrates argues that
orators and dictators hold no power or control over their audiences and subsequently the city.
Nevertheless, after being constantly berated by Socrates logic, Polus and Socrates conclude that one
does not want an act; one would want an act if it were beneficial to some degree, and avoid an act if
it were harmful. This conclusion adds to Socrates argument concerning desire which fundamentally
leads to one of the key differences between the philosophers. According to Socrates, pleasure is
structured, and Callicles' belief that it is not. The problem with the way Socrates' views are
presented in Gorgias, is that they can be viewed as hypocritical for Socrates simply

Plato 's Views On Politics Essay
Through much of Plato's texts, there are many instances of common interpretations of terms and
disciplines described in fairly uncommon ways. Such a trend is no different in both Plato 's Gorgias
and Apology discussing the importance and meaning of politics and the use of rhetoric. In the
Gorgias, Socrates participates in a continued dialogue against the role of rhetoric's deceiving nature
as being the best way to live one 's life. For he states to receive pleasure through injustice by means
of rhetoric is the most wretched life that one live. Therefore, the rhetorician is the worst type of
politician for they only want to convince through rhetoric to obtain pleasure rather than do what is
best for the people. However, throughout the Apology Plato describes Socrates as taking a different
take on the role of politics altogether. Unlike his convincing comments on politics in the Gorgias,
Socrates claims he does not know much about politics and would rather of not survived if partaken
in such an occupation. Yet, this such claim fully supports much of his dismantlement of the role of
rhetorician. As the politician for Socrates is one that deceives through rhetoric and since Socrates
does not employ the tools of rhetoric he would not survive in the world of politics. Unfortunately,
Socrates's choice to stay away form the field of politics doesn 't save him death after all as see with
his sentencing to death in the Apology. While this may seem like a devastating outcome,

Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 's ' Gorgias '
In Gorgias by Plato, Socrates questions and stands his ground on the disadvantages of Rhetoric.
Like Socrates, I believe that Rhetoric is a progressive form of language used to enhance one's self by
convincing others of their perspective and gain something in return for it, and that it shouldn't be
used because Rhetoric is dangerous to use to any person who could potentially use it for the wrong
purpose.
Socrates believes that rhetoric is a branch of flattery (Plato 27). Socrates makes it known that
Rhetoric is not something anybody should use because it would turn that person evil. He goes on to
discuss about how every action that one person does, has an "equal and opposite reaction" to the rest
of the universe (Plato 42). And with that, in our class discussion, Taylor mentions a game that just
recently came out where "any little thing you do can kill or save someone else in the game."
Callicles and Gorgias have their own opinion of what rhetoric is, and both of theirs are somewhat
similar. For Socrates, his definition differs as he says, "Well then, to me, Gorgias, rhetoric seems not
to be an artistic pursuit at all, but that of a shrewd, courageous spirit which is naturally clever at
dealing with men; and I call the chief part of it flattery (Plato 23)." Socrates makes this statement to
explain that rhetoric is not a profession of any sort; rhetoric is just the praise and complimenting of
men to get them to do something. Which I feel as though would work only on those

Analysis Of Gorgias Encomium Of Helen, Isocrates, And...
One of the main differences between humans and animals is our stream of conscience.
Our stream of conscience contributes to our ability to speak and form language in a powerful way,
which overall contributes to the ability to function successfully within a society. Many philosophers
built on the philosophies of the political atmosphere, language, and the shift from literacy (recited
knowledge) to oratory (agency, ability to formulate personal thoughts and opinions). Through the
analysis of various philosophical works, I will provide the basic understanding of the importance of
the development of rhetoric and how it's foundation has set the precedent for the future. In this paper
I intend to explore, Gorgias Encomium of Helen, Isocrates, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These statements imply that language is powerful, and has the ability to put the audience under the
spell of persuasion to the means of the speakers end. Gorgias's use of antithesis, length, and rhythm
made his audience not only "aroused by sensual pleasure", but also "shared a sense of participation
in a kind of wisdom available no other way" (author, pg 42). This type of speech was seen as unique
because language like this has never been used prior to the shift from oratory to literacy. Overall, the
"Encomium of Helen" helped philosophers and rhetoricians understand rhetoric and language by (1)
Gorgias demonstration of his own rhetorical wisdom/skill, (2) Offering an argument that speech is
just as powerful as gods, psychical force, seduction, and the true power of love, and (3) Introduces
the question of whether rhetoric itself or those who abuse rhetoric, are responsible for its moral and
ethical implications.
The development and change that led to the rhetorical shift Dissoi Logoi
As Gorgias spread his wisdom and skill through the Encomium of Helen, other philosophers also
expressed their wisdom and skill through contributing multiple perspectives on rhetoric. As other
philosophers have studied rhetoric, there has been many different perspectives and criticisms that
add to the complexity of understanding rhetoric and its effect on society. The Dissoi Logoi adds a

Knack vs Craft in Gorgias Essay
In the book Gorgias Socrates finds himself in an argument with Polus and Gorgias about whether
oratory is a knack or a craft. Socrates' opinion is that oratory is not a craft but rather a knack. When
looking at the distinction between a knack and a craft it is commonly agreed upon that a knack is
simply something that one is instinctively better at than others and a craft is a skill that one acquires
through pursuit. With this said, the distinction that Socrates makes between a knack and a craft is a
much deeper and more abstract one. Socrates argues that a knack is part of a shameful practice, that
practice being flattery, and is only in accordance with what is most pleasant at the time, where as a
craft deals with fitness of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The same goes for gymnastics and cosmetics. Cosmetics may make you look like you are healthy
but they do not make you actually healthy, where as gymnastics knows what's best for your physical
health (Plato 25,26).
This is what Socrates specifically refers to as flattery and is such the thing that he finds to be
shameful because it does not take into consideration what is best for both the body and soul but
instead guesses at what is most pleasant at the moment (Plato 25). Without the soul to govern the
body the world would not know what is best for it. This is what makes a knack undesirable and
shameful. What Socrates is ultimately saying is that flattery is deception and that is exactly what
oratory is.
Socrates' argument about oratory being a knack, and a knack being part of a shameful practice, is
backed up by his premises and thus makes his argument valid. The premises consisted of the four
parts of flattery and each of their counter parts that are found in a craft. After he explains the four
parts of both a knack and a craft he explains how a knack is only what is best for the time being,
where as

Plato Bias : A Debate Between Gorgias And Socrates
A debate between Gorgias and Socrates is sparked throughout Gorgias. Socrates argument consists
of trying to search for the precise essence of rhetoric. Gorgias thinks you need rhetoric, whereas
Socrates believes people need knowledge. In the first part of Gorgias Socrates tries to prove that an
entire sphere of human exertion, persuasive speech, is morally inoperative. He believes that rhetoric
doesn't require anyone to understand about the subject matter about which they speak. Rhetoric is
really only a talent for persuading people into believing something instead of arguing using
knowledge. Socrates argues rhetoric is made up of telling people what they want to hear instead of
telling them the truth. When Gorgias is unexpectedly not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Socrates asks a simple question expecting a simple answer. Socrates asks Gorgias to continue to
respond to his questions as briefly as possible. Gorgias claims no one can speak more briefly than he
can. As Socrates goes on to question Gorgias, Socrates uses socratic irony when he says "I'm really
impressed with your answers, Gorgias. I can't imagine how they could be shorter" (Socrates 5). It is
almost as if Socrates is only allowing short answers from Gorgias and does not allow him to go
greater into detail. However, Socrates does this so that Gorgias can't explain his answers to put
himself in a better light. So far, Socrates is controlling the debate. Socrates uses logos as he
questions Gorgias if there is a difference between knowledge and belief, and Gorgias says that they
are different. "Now, do you think that the state of having been taught something is the same as the
state of having been convinced?" (Socrates 14). Gorgias agrees with Socrates that conviction and
knowledge isn't the same. Persuasion's used to have someone to learn something. Socrates states that
there are two different kinds of persuasion, philosophical and rhetorical, Gorgias then agrees. After
Socrates has Gorgias agree with him after asking multiple questions, Socrates wants to understand
exactly what has been said about rhetoric so far. Gorgias states that a

Socrates Rhetoric
Things are not always what they seem. The Republican Party has now captured the House of
Representatives and the Senate. Many were not surprised, as history has shown that when a
president has low approval ratings, the opposing political party usually gains seats in Congress. The
Republicans' main argument was the failure of the Affordable Care Act. The platform was that they
would work on their constituents' behalf to repeal the health care law. However, it has been shown
that the health care law is working, providing health insurance for many who previously did not
have any health insurance. How did the Republicans convince their constituents to believe the
contrary? Plato would argue that the Republicans are truly the masters of rhetoric. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
What is unusual about the first section of the Gorgias is that, rather than disabuse one for claiming to
know some Y or Z, Plato tried to show that rhetoric is one of moral bankruptcy. Socrates wished to
know what is rhetoric and its purpose. Gorgias is consulted by Socrates since he was deemed an
expert in rhetoric. Rhetoric for Gorgias is the ability to persuade others, specifically jurors in the
courts, members of the Council, and citizens attending the assembly (Plato, 13, 452e). However,
Socrates astutely found that other professions have the ability to persuade. Gorgias responded by
stating that the ability to persuade is specifically for mass meetings (Plato, 15, 454b). Persuasion can
take two paths: one that confers conviction without proper understanding and another which confers
knowledge. Rhetoric as described by Gorgias is persuasion which leads to conviction. Therefore,
rhetoric is an agent of persuasion to produce conviction and not to educate citizens. The nature of
persuasion produced is based on opinion and not knowledge. The rhetorician is an expert in
knowing what the masses want, which is pleasure. From this knowledge the rhetorician can please
the crowd to gain their support. In contemporary American politics this is an indispensable ability
where the citizens' passions are used in order for the politician to be elected to public

Gorgias Rhetorical Analysis
In Gorgias, many descriptive analogies are used throughout the entire book. Plato uses these
analogies to try to convince his opponents of his beliefs. These analogies entice the dialogue and
make it more intriguing. Throughout the entirety of the book, these analogies give the text more
clarity that helps the reader (and the characters in the dialogue) understand the arguments. Some of
Plato's most persuasive analogies are the cracked jar, his analogy between good and pleasant, and
his example of cookery and medicine.
One great analogy that is made in Gorgias, is the leaky jar example on 493 "That part of the soul in
foolish people where the desires reside he likened to a leaky jar, because it can never be filled."
Socrates utilizes this leaky jar metaphor in order to display the significance of self–control, an
ongoing theme of the dialogue. Essentially, Socrates intends to prove that the control of one's desires
brings a person closer to virtue and a person who gives into temptation is automatically immoral.
This metaphorical imagery is very similar to Callicles's proposal that a proper life results from one's
possessing the bravery and intelligence to satisfy desires. It ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Rhetoric is to justice what cookery is to medicine." Socrates discusses what he believes are false
arts, such as cookery. This flawed pursuit chases a more worthy counterpart medicine. The main
contrast between the true and the false arts lies in the fact that the pleasant, ignoring the good and
thereby create a false impression of value commonly known as "cookery." True arts, by contrast, are
directly aimed at the good and thus by nature benefit those who practice values. In this statement,
Socrates defines rhetoric as a mere false impression of the more pure concept of justice. The
fallacious routine of cookery is very similar to the true art of medicine: each provides a vague image
of something more ethical and

Influential Rhetoricians During The Time Of ( 483
Gorgias the "Rhetorician" Ancient Athens had many influential rhetoricians during the time of (483
– 375 B.C.E), Gorgias of Leontini was a major figure prominent because of his skills in the art of
rhetoric. Gorgias helped rhetoric's development because of his renown skills as a rhetorician. At the
time the ability to communicate and deliver oratory was what gave one influence in Ancient Athens.
Gorgias contribution was significant to the culture and development of rhetoric because, he believed
in teaching rhetoric to the common man, and through the defense of Helen in his epidictic speech
the Encomium of Helen and his aura he spread wherever he went being able to persuade and
communicate with the best. Gorgias was a Sophist by nature of that time but rejected the title to be a
"Rhetorician" and had the beliefs like the Sophist that rhetoric was a universal right. He believed
that the common man deserved to learn rhetoric from teachers if they could conjure up the large
amounts money needed to learn from renown teachers of Gorgias status. Many from outside of
rhetoric would say it was incredibly wrong to charge people who couldn't afford to pay for teaching
and spend all their money just to learn rhetoric. What Gorgias would argue is that those outsiders
who found it wrong to charge money did not understand the power and influence rhetoric gave to
someone in Ancient Athens. Rhetoric gave the common man the ability to yield conversation in the
polis, debates, and

Plato's Critique Of Rhetoric
Through the figure of the sophist, I aim to explore Plato's critiques of rhetoric by looking at two
dialogues in particular, Apology and Gorgias. Using these dialogues as well as references to other of
his dialogues including Phaedrus, Protagoras, and Sophist, I will argue that while Plato critiques the
role of rhetoric in sophist arguments, he does not present the philosopher as free of rhetoric either, as
he himself uses elements derived from the rhetoric he critiques in his arguments. This will then be
argued to be problematic to the traditional conception of the distinction between the sophist and the
philosopher, as well as his overall view of the sophist through his work as a whole. Firstly, I will
consider Apology in the context of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead question me if you can, and prove that I'm wrong. Otherwise you must answer me."15 This
quote is found in a section where he again incorporates rhetoric into his argument. This is another
example of times where Socrates incorporates rhetoric into his argumentative discourse. For this
reason some argue that at times, Socrates is admitting the need of rhetoric in philosophy. In this way,
Socrates is also seen as admitting the power of rhetoric.16 Two more arguments for this regarding
Plato's writing of the work in the context of his oeuvre: the strength of the arguments presented by
Callicles and Gorgias. Gorgias, for example, offers a distinction to separate rhetoric and other areas
of knowledge, which would be a significant detriment to Socrates' argument were it accepted.17
Callicles is also seen as providing a strong argument, and many authors have argued that Socrates'
attempt to refute him fails.18 This is also connected in a way to the ultimate outcome of Gorgias;
Socrates fails to persude any of his opponents and ends up confronting Callicles in a rather nasty
manner. These are ultimately written dialogues where Socrates is the protagonist, so it is interesting
that the ending is as such. There are naturally many

The Ilusory Dialogue In Plato's Gorgias
Summary
Plato's Gorgias presents an illusory dialogue that is inaugurated upon Socrates' analysis of nature
and the power Gorgias states are presented in his art, oratory. The first two opening lines of the
dialogue forecast the nature of the text, for Callicles and Socrates allude to a Greek saying that is
like the Shakespearian saying, "first at a feast, last at a fray", when Socrates and his fellow peer,
Chaerophon, arrive tardily to the presentation awarded by the famed orator of the time and the
namesake of Plato's dialogue, Gorgias. The dialogue takes place on the street and the discussion
begins when Socrates dubiously pries for clarification from the esteemed Gorgias about the
supremacy and the basis of his craft, of which the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates tries, but fails, to convince Callicles that he knows of Callicles' beliefs better than Callicles
seem to know himself. Subsequently, Callicles, rejects Socrates outlook vehemently, and refuses to
yield to the works of Socratic logic. Instead, Callicles spent a good portion of the dialogue simply
chastising Socrates and his immersion in the search of philosophy (484c). According to Callicles, a
grown man should not engross himself in such a pursuit for it is, apparently, disgraceful,
unsophisticated, and childlike. Throughout the discussion, Socrates equips the audience with an
abstract logical proof of the distinction between the good and the pleasant, despite Callicles
persistence that pleasure and good are identical (494a–495a). The remainder of the text concludes
with Socrates attempt to reveal an apposite balance of the virtues and their materialization into a
righteous life (495d–496e). He describes the virtue of the body as well the soul through aerobics and
medicine, as well as through abstinence and righteousness respectively (497c–498a). At the
dialogue's conclusion, Socrates speaks of his fear – not of death, but of facing judgment with a
corrupt soul (522e). According to Socrates, a corrupt soul can be alleviated through punishment in
Hades but the best chance of having an untainted soul and evading said punishment is through the
impassive and isolated life of philosophy that he himself leads

Callicles 'Pursuit Of Happiness In Socrates Gorgias'
The great philosophers of ancient Greece concerned much of their time with what is the best path of
life and how to achieve it. Many people question what true happiness is and how it can be achieved.
In Plato's Gorgias, Socrates talks and muses about what happiness is, why people seek happiness,
how it is achieved and what the best way to achieve it is. In one part, Socrates tries to explain to
Callicles why not all pleasure is happiness and that one must use restraint and temperance to control
ones desires and help them achieve happiness (Gorgias, 488). Callicles argues with Socrates, stating
that happiness can only be truly achieved when one allows their goals to flourish without any
boundaries or anything to stop them (Gorgias, 489). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Polus disagrees and claims that there are many people who have done wrong that are happy and that
to experience discomfort from punishment is not happiness (Gorgias, 470). Socrates still persists
that those who do evil are unhappy, but Polus retorts by citing a tyrant as an example of one who has
done wrong but is happy (Gorgias, 473). Polus talks about a tyrant who killed his young nephew in
order to gain power and then argues that by having so much power this tyrant is now happier than he
was before (Gorgias, 473). Socrates disagrees and says that he is in fact unhappy due to the shame
he feels for the terrible acts he has committed in order to attain his power and that he holds a lot of
guilt inside him for what he has done (Gorgias, 476). Socrates then goes on about why those who
commit evil and shameful and crimes and then escape punishment are the least happiest of all. Polus
still does not agree with this notion and argues that those who commit evil acts and get away with
them with no punishment should be the happiest as the experience power and pleasure with no
punishment or consequences (Gorgias, 477). Socrates retorts by reiterating his previous statement
that it is

Gorgias Encomium Of Helen Of Troy
Based off of my understanding of the word encomium, and the knowledge I have on Helen of Troy,
I immediately understood the objective of Gorgias', Encomium of Helen, as a testimony to Helen's
innocence. With that, I could not avoid my first assumption that at some level, a sophist is a
persuader. Knowing that the answer to the debate over Helen's character is universally unknown, I
found it interesting for someone to assert such a strong stand right away. For Gorgias to take such a
position on such a disputed matter, it was clear he was in for an argument. Gorgias is upfront and
open with his intent in claiming Helen's innocence. He began with simple analogies of order and
disorder that I was able to follow easily. Yet, rather quickly I was able to pick up on the somewhat
negative and pretentious statements that were being made. For example, he states by "bestowing
some rationality on the discourse..." he will "show that those who blame her are lying..." and he will
"put an end to ignorance." These boastful statements had me question the nature of a sophist. I find
that the level of conviction necessary to make these bold statements in an argument show that a
sophist can easily be haughty or possibly overbearing. Using borderline derogatory remarks in
efforts to persuade an audience shows the sense of superiority a sophist ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I noticed that while some bold statements were being said, the flow of the argument was still rather
effective. I found that many of Gorgias' points, such as the plans of the gods, being abducted by
force, or persuasion, were broken down in a simple manner. His arguments were, in a sense, logical.
Therefore, I believe a sophist must be intelligent to some extent. To formulate an argument in a way
that is sound and structured, one must have some level of knowledge on how to articulate and

Comparing Gorgias And Socrates Rhetoric

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paula Smith

More from Paula Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Comparing Gorgias And Socrates Rhetoric