Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal

Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal
On April 22, 2017 two protests occurred at the capitol building in Lincoln, Nebraska. One gathered
hundreds of people and filled the steps. The other consisted of three people. The March for Science
gathered a crowd of people whose reason for standing with signs was that "science was under
attack". The other protested the systematic abuse of U.S. correctional facilities. In the past month
three correctional officers had been assaulted and one inmate had been murdered within the state of
Nebraska. None had died for the "attack on science" and yet people cheered and rallied. This lack of
attention towards prison problems is not just evident in protests, however. Despite horrific abuse
throughout the country, the public and the government have ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
citizens, but it was the researchers afterwards that contributed the most startling idea. Zimbardo, the
same man who ran the Stanford Prison Experiment, said in an interview with the New York Times,
"Prisons tend to be brutal and abusive places unless great effort is made to control the guards' base
impulses. It's not that we put bad apples in a good barrel. We put good apples in a bad barrel. The
barrel corrupts anything that it touches" (Swhwartz, 2004 p. 2). A professor of Law at Loyola
University, Marcy Strauss, studies criminal procedure and wrote a forty–two page manuscript on the
lessons that should be discussed beyond news articles. Strauss said of Abu Ghraib, "Undoubtedly,
these factors [poor training of guards, poor oversight and horrendous conditions] played a major role
in facilitating the abuse. Correcting these conditions is imperative. But, to end the introspection
there would be a mistake" (Strauss, 2005 p.9). The idea that people could be malignant under
specific circumstances has been proven by Milgrams' studies and this idea is now apparent in real
life. Thus, the concern for prisons, as pointed out by both Zimbardo and Strauss, cannot simply be
that the guards or correctional officers do not abuse people in the future. The issue is that the
maltreatment and indignity in Abu Ghraib was a result of the poor foundation of the U.S.
correctional system (Strauss,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

A Long Time Citizens
For a long time citizens have always respected the soldiers who stand to protect the nation, but none
care about how they do it or the psychological traumas they go through. After the Iraq War several
disturbing photos were released to the public. People who were distraught like Susan Sontag spoke
up and demanded an explanation for the events that took place in Abu Ghraib prison. Many have
questioned why no punishment was given to the perpetrators, but were disappointed when no direct
answer was given. Sontag tries to make a connection between the photos the military and their
leaders, and what they portray about the American society in her piece Regarding The Torture Of
Others. She displays acts of the military and their leaders showing justification in their act of torture
to enemies outside the United States. The act of generalizing a nation by an event in its history is not
effective and weakens her argument. This even has shaken the nation's image to the world, creating
a different interpretation about America and its citizens, which might not be accurate. The
photographs of the events that occurred in Abu Ghraib prison shows torture and abuse done to the
prisoners by American soldiers. The photos taken show how the military took pride in abusing and
torturing victims. The act of torturing prisoners gave the military a sense of achievement a
memorable event that needed to be recorded. Susan Sontag observed that, "the perpetrators posing,
gloating, over their helpless

Abu Ghraib Prison Pros And Cons
The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution says, "Excessive bail shall not be required,
nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." The fundamental idea of
torture is to inflict mental or physical pain onto a suspect as a form of punishment to obtain
information from them. This tactic is illegal because it violates the Constitution, and in addition, it
violates international agreements that our nation has committed itself to. The general provisions of
the Geneva Conference of 1949 prevent the use of torture in war; the document specifically outlaws
"Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating or degrading treatment..." By violating
these laws, particularly the Constitution, our nation is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, the torture implemented at Abu Ghraib produced no useful information. Willie J.
Rowell, a thirty–six year veteran of the Army's Criminal Investigation Command, says concerning
the prisoners in pain, "They'll tell you what you want to hear, truth or no truth." The information
produced through the use of torture at Abu Ghraib proved to be false, and it accurately represents a
much larger trend in which torture does not produce valuable information. A Senate Intelligence
Committee's report indicated that the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques from 2002 to 2008
produced no intelligence useful to counter imminent threats to our national security because the
suspected terrorists being interrogated frequently fabricated information. In addition, the Senate's
report was so gruesome that the Department of Defense warned American Embassies and military
bases overseas to be prepared for a possible terrorist attack in retaliation. The belief that torture can
be used to obtain information vital to our nation's security is flawed because it has been proven to be
useless for nearly two

Essay on Abu Ghraib and Insaniyat
Abu Ghraib and Insaniyat
Article by: Arshin Adib–Moghaddam
"We have met the enemy, and he is us"
Iraq is a different world than where we live in North America. Canadian values and culture of North
America are vastly different from those of the Middle Eastern country that is the subject of an–
article by Arshin Adib–Moghaddam titled Abu Gharib and Insaniyat. Following the terrorist attacks
in New York in 2001 the differences between these two cultures seemed immense. The stories and
images that were beamed into our houses by television and other media were unreal to our eyes.
From our perspective we feel fortunate to live in a different place and wonder how the world got to a
point where things can be so different in two places, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They saw every Iraqi, Pakistani, Iranian or Saudi as a terrorist and a threat to their country. All were
subject to a negative judgement without cause or trial. With the benefit of a passage of time we have
learned that these feelings were misdirected and wrong. It was as though certain people, those of a
different race and nationally, were robbed of their human rights and cast in the role of criminals
solely because of their culture and the acts of groups they likely did not know. In the calm aftermath
and a chance to reflect on this behaviour some American officials admitted that Abu Ghraib was the
functional equivalent of the 9/11 attack, only committed this time by the United States (Greenberg
2005: 98).
Prior to 9/11there had been various terrorist attacks on Americans around the world and on
American soil. However the events of September 11 intensely changed the United States
Government's approach towards terrorism. After September 11, the Bush Administration changed
the previous American approach, which had primarily employed the combined tools of diplomatic
cooperation, economic sanctions, and internationally coordinated law enforcement measures (Lee
2007: 137). Instead, the President declared in the aftermath of September 11 that the United States
was engaged in a war on terrorism. In this war all terrorists who plotted against the United States
and those who supported them were subject to American justice. This new

Torture And Dehumanization Of The Holocaust And Abu Ghraib
Torture and Dehumanization in the Holocaust and Abu Ghraib Throughout time, torture has been
used as a cruel war tactic to exploit human beings and dehumanize the characteristics that give
people their identities outside of prison walls. In Rena 's Promise: A Story of Sisters in Auschwitz,
Rena Kornreich tells her own accounts of the torture she experienced by both men and women
during World War II. Similarly, Coco Fusco sheds light on the use of torture by women in the United
States Abu Ghraib military scandal in A Field Guide for Female Interrogators. While in very
different time frames, a female victim and a female liberator seamlessly tie together the antics that
have been experienced and performed in war by thousands of men and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Upon returning the cap, the SS woman orders her German Shepard to attack the frail girl. Rena
glances at the sight, "Her bloodied arms flail the air. The dog reaches her throat. Cemented before
my eyes, never to rest, is her spirit as it departs, separated from her body by a dog's jaws on her
neck." (Macadam, 197). The dog is then praised as it returns to the Nazi woman and licks the
innocent bloodshed from its paws. This killing displays the ruthlessness executed by Nazi women,
as well as the pleasure they seemed to take from taking lives of the innocent. Not only did the
soldier inflict physical torture, but psychological torture to those who had to witness and hear the
death of their comrade. This directly affected Rena in that she was instructed to carry the girls' body
back to camp; "every step I take, her cries tear my soul." (Macadam, 198). In comparison to Rena's
Promise, Coco Fusco delves into the use of female soldiers in the Iraqi Abu Ghraib prison scandal in
the early 2000s. Female interrogators were "depicted in widely circulated photographs" "whose
sexualized humiliation of prisoners has come to symbolize the utter breakdown of any pretense the
US may have once had to being a guardian of democratic values" (Fusco, 19). Specifically, several
photographs of female soldiers Lynndie England and Sabrina Harman surfaced showing them giving
thumbs up and smiling over the battered

Abu Ghraib Human Rights Violations
In our ever–transparent world where our actions as a nation are continuously scrutinized, it is
exceptionally important that we begin to strengthen our group mentality when it comes to
international relations. As a powerful and resourceful nation, we have a lot to offer the international
community. Instead of embarking on our own humanitarian missions, we could be more effective by
strengthening institutions like the United Nations or the International Monetary Fund. The United
States seems to particularly enjoy acting from a position of perceived moral superiority; even after
the egregious human rights violations that took place at Abu Ghraib (Walt, S, 2011). The United
States has also refused to sign a human rights treaty since 2002, despite condemning other countries
for violations of human rights (Human Rights Library). According ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Our involvement in Iraq led to the death of over 100,000 people including innocent civilians
following the invasion and occupation of Iraq (Walt, S, 2011). Similarly, the arming of Nicaraguan
Contra rebels during the Reagan administration is a clear example of how American Exceptionalism
led to unnecessary foreign entanglement (Myre, G, 2014). The US supplied rebels with weapons to
fight the leftist Sandinista and over 30,000 people were killed with neither side coming out on top
(Myre, G, 2014). It was later discovered that the Reagan administration had sold weapons to Iran
and given the proceeds to the Contras against congressional law (Myre, G, 2014). Looking back on
the incident reveals several instances where we could have done significantly better. Granting that
hindsight is 20/20, it is a fair conclusion to say that had the US not been so hasty to solve the
problem singlehandedly and involved more likeminded institutions or nations, the outcome could
have been more

Abu Ghraib Prison Research Paper
What happened at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq can only be described as war crimes. The torture of
prisoners under American control includes being beaten, stripped, shocked, and starved of food
among many other cruelties. In spite of the overwhelming proof of crimes, many of those involved
were only charged with abuse of prisoners not of war crimes. Of those involved, only the lower to
mid–level personnel were charged. The overseer of the prison, General Janis Karpinski, was only
relieved of her command. Other top level personnel within the army were cleared of all wrongdoing.
At first many media sources tried to spin the torture of the prisoners as actions similar to hazing
rituals. Other people viewed the photographs as normal within the

Abu Ghraib : The Stanford Prison Experiment
Abu Ghraib: The Stanford Prison Experiment in a Combat Zone Gilman F Cooper Creighton
University ROTC The Abu Ghraib torture scandal left a large blemish on the occupation of Iraq and
George Bush's War on terror. As stories of the torture happening in the Abu Ghraib prison began
circulating, American citizens had trouble comprehending the acts of evil their soldiers had
committed on Iraqis. Some began to see a correlation between Abu Ghraib and the infamous
Stanford Prison Experiment. Though the guards in both situations were brutal to their captives,
distinct differences lay in the severity of their actions. Abu Ghraib's guards were much more vicious
to their captives, and this can be attributed to the prejudices the guards felt against their captors, the
environment, and the lack of training, compounded with a lack of accountability in the leadership.
The prisoners in Abu Ghraib subjected to the torture of the 800th MP Brigade were so treated
initially because of perceived differences. In social psychology, it is a natural behavior to attribute
bad feelings towards someone that is believed to be different. The MPs were thousands of miles
away from home running a prison in a country some believed was planning to hurt American and
her allies using weapons of mass destruction. A study notes that, in 2004, the average American saw
the Arabs as "...not especially sincere, honest, friendly, or warm." The MPs casted these Arabs in an
outgroup and their prejudices against the

Abu Ghraib Prison Experiment Essay
Abu Ghraib Prison was a cruel and inhumane form of torture that occurred during the famous era of
Saddam Hussein. Twenty miles west of Baghdad, Abu Ghraib stood as the most infamous prisons
the world has ever seen. There was reported weekly executions, daily torture and barbarous living
conditions. As many as fifty thousand men and women were crammed into Abu Ghraib at once.
During the war against Iraq, The United States Army took over the prison and committed extenuous
human rights violations against the prisoners. Detainees were raped, beaten, stripped, deprived of
food and sleep, hung by their wrists and threatened with death all under American control. A famous
picture taken at Abu Ghraib depicts an Iraqi standing on a box, in a scarecrow–like ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though this was just an experiment many of the test subjects were quickly pushed to their limits and
the ones in authority took their roles to the extreme. Eventually, this caused an early shut down of
the experiment. There was a total of 9 students who were willing to be the prisoners in this
experiment. The study issued that the guards would be forced to give brutal and cruel torture upon
the prisoner. The experiment was known as one of the most controversial studies in the history of
social psychology because even though it was an experiment, the prisoners went through major
psychological changes and one prisoner even succumbed to a short period of insanity. Through
deindividualized torture, exploitation and manipulation many of the test subjects underwent the
same torture as those who were imprisoned at Abu Ghraib. It was finally shut down by a woman by
the name of Christina Maslach but similarly to Abu Ghraib no one was held accountable for the
short period of torture. Also like Abu Ghraib, the men who played the role of the guards in The
Stanford Prison Experiment underwent psychological changes where they became evil, relentless
and manipulative all while blaming it on the fact that they're "just following orders." In many cases
when a person is given authority, they abuse it

Dr. Zimbardo 's ' The Lucifer Effect '
For centuries we have found means of humiliating, demeaning, killing and torturing each other, and
cited various reasons for the same: country, religion, law, war, race, superiority, superstition and
various other reasons. Our history is overflowing with blood poured out sometimes for heroic deeds
but often for a means to gain power. I have often speculated on the reason behind these violations of
human dignity and killing, when every religion and social culture promotes good will and condemns
evil. So what makes 'good people' turn the corner between good and evil? We often see evil as an
outside force interrupting our lives! We consider evil an entity or quality that is inherent in some
people, that turn people into monsters! ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1971, Dr. Zimbardo as a young psychologist at Stanford University, CA conducted an experiment
on prison behavior where normal, run of the mill liberal undergraduate students volunteers were
divided into two groups, 'prisoners' and 'guards'. Even though students knew, that it was an artificial
situation, the guards, assumed a sense of power and tormented, tortured and sexually humiliated
their prisoners regardless of the fact that they knew that the prisoners had done no wrong. The
prisoners were brainwashed into a role of helplessness, dejection and acceptance of their faith.
Zimbardo and his colleagues got so carried away with how well the experiment was turning out, that
he did nothing to stop it! They had all lost their moral compass in this situation! It was probably déjà
vu for Dr. Zimbardo when in April 2004, a news channel, 60 Minutes II, broke the story on Abu
Ghraib and telecast shocking photographs as evidence of human cruelty and human rights violations
carried out by American soldiers on Iraqi detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison. The pictures included
naked Iraqi captives piled in a human pyramid, prisoner's lead around on a leash by guards,
prisoners forced to engage in sexual acts, dogs intimidating prisoners, a hooded inmate balanced on
a cardboard box and electric wires attached to his fingers to mention a few. In some photographs,
the guards are seen posing,

What Is Abu Ghraib Unethical
A prison located in Iraq, "Abu Ghraib" was occupied by United States army in the early 2000s,
where Iraqi detainees and tortured. While the United States hoped to acquire information about
terror in hopes to save a greater number of people, reducing other people to merely a means was
unethical. In this review of the case of Abu Ghraib, I will examine various events and possible
contributing factors to unethical treatments of prisoners. Further, This essay will explore two
opposing perspectives for and against reasoning for tortures. To respond to the unethical nature of
the guards' behavior, I will apply Kant's method to ethics. Additionally, while trying to explain why
the United States actions, I will refer to Utilitarianism. Lastly, This ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
completely unethical. Immanuel Kant in his book "Religion within the Bounds of Reason Alone
(Part I: On the Indwelling of the Bad Principle along with the Good; or, On the Radical Evil in
Human Nature)", explains evil as knowing the difference between good and evil and choosing to do
evil. Some of the guards from Abu Ghraib stated they knew some of the abuse techniques where
unreasonable however they want to head to do it. Additionally while trying understanding morality
and society, Kant uses the categorical imperative. Kant's categorical imperative holds that to indicate
whether an act is ethical, apply your maxim as a universal law if the result is positive then the act is
acceptable.In the case study of Ghraib, Kant will respond by considering the result of making
extreme torturous to gain information while dehumanizing people is made universal law. The
torturous conduct by the prison guards cannot be a logical principle. Further more, referring to
Kant's practical imperative, "Act so that you use humanity, as much in your own person as in the
person of every other, always at the same time as an end and never merely as means."(p 47–48).
Kant would agree that people should be treated as ends not

The Prison Experiment And The Abu Ghraib Prison
Kohlberg's morality theory defines various levels and stages where a person's morality can be tested
on a scale. Reviewing the Stanford prison experiment and the Abu Ghraib prison was interesting.
The guards in the Stanford prison experiment reacted differently than each other and showed
different levels of morality. In the Abu Ghraib prison, the guards were put in a real life situation
where the morals were tested. It was fascinating to see how the two different scenarios had similar
behaviors.
The guards had different morality levels that varied by how the prisoners acted towards the guards.
At the start of the experiment, no guards were given orders on how to maintain the jail and
prisoners. Going into the experiment many guards had the incentive of Level 2–Stage 4, because
they wanted to have rules to promote order within the prison. For an example of this, guards had
lineups for the prisoners to familiarize their new number identities. When the prisoners did not
follow these rules, the guards shifted levels. At first it started at Level 1–Stage 1, because the
prisoners only broke minor rules, like talking back to the guards or not taking the lineups seriously.
Therefore, guards served minor punishment such as making the prisoners do pushups. Rules were
broken more severely which led to more severe punishment. The guards had to punish the prisoners,
because on the second day they staged a rebellion in which they locked themselves in their cells.
The level of

Abu Ghraib Documentary Analysis
I began my research first by watching a documentary on Abu Ghraib. In 2008, director Errol Morris
released a documentary called "standard operating procedure." The purpose of this video was to
demonstrate how powerful pictures are and how American soldiers had no respect for human dignity
when relating to the tortures and conditions the inmates had faced. The saying "pictures are worth a
thousand words" plays a key role here because all the pictures that were taken at this prison portrays
the hardships of the inmates. According to officer Sabrina, she wrote to her friend Kelly saying,
"sandbags were put over their heads while we soaked them in hot sauce," and this exemplifies that
the officers did not care whatsoever as to what kind of crimes they are committing. Morris uses ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If I were to watch the same film without any background music it would not have the same effect
because the music adds suspense and persuades me to take an approach. Not only did Morris use
pathos but he also had a distinct style when directing this short film. His style consists of having his
interviewees talk directly into the camera. He uses a method that is known as interrotron, which had
made his works famous. Interrotron is when the director is seen as opposed to a script, meaning the
person being questioned is looking precisely at the director. I think this is important because this
way the audience builds a relationship with the interviewees. Guards tried to persuade the audience
that the methods they used were justified because higher officials, Military Intelligence, told them it
was right. This just shows that the officers needed a reason to believe these acts were appropriate as
opposed to differentiating from what is right and wrong. But when the guards were interviewed
individually they rephrased what they said to blame their acts on higher officials and draw less
attention to

Why Is Abu Ghraib Cruel
Abu Ghraib is Not Yet in the Grave According to jail time served by prisoners, it is less punishable
to abuse foreign prisoners than it is to deal drugs. The average time served by the eleven offenders
involved during the Abu Ghraib scandal was 13.1 months, compared to the average of five years for
drug dealers (CNN Library). Only five out of the eleven people directly involved actually served
time at all, with the most time served being 6 years out of an original 10 year sentence. So instead of
dealing that heroin, maybe you could torture and humiliate soldiers, if you're looking to serve less
time in jail. The ghastly events at the Abu Ghraib prison occurred throughout 2003, but the
American public did not find out until the broadcast of "60 Minutes II" in April of 2004. The
photographs released include images of dogs attacking prisoners, soldiers giving the "thumbs–up"
sign as they appear to stitch prisoners' wounds, prisoners positioned in humiliating poses (often
naked), and prisoners forced to perform homosexual activities, which are illegal in most Islamic
countries (Harman). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The little guys shouldn't have to pay for it either–it was revealed in August 2004 that "responsibility
for the mistreatment of prisoners went higher up the chain of command... [from] Washington" (CNN
Library). Why should we trust the politicians in Washington when they could be behind it all? Abu
Ghraib was not an isolated U.S. event, as similar abuse took place in a British prison during the
same time period (Cobain). Though the Abu Ghraib prisoners never received justice for the abuse
that was inflicted on them, we as a country can ensure that if a similar event occurs, those who are
accountable will be held accountable, and that the U.S. is not just trying to cover up death and

Abu Ghraib Prison Experiment
In this paper I will illustrate how the lessons learned from the Stanford Experiment apply to
understanding the dynamics of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib. The Stanford Experiment
demonstrates how social influence can persuade one's behavior and shape their conformity. The
experiment and the prisoner abuse in Abu Ghraib exemplify the power of authority by utilizing their
positions and uniforms to control and overrule the prisoners. People are sentenced to prison as
punishment of a crime that has been committed, not for punishment. The job of a prison guard or
correctional officer is to help maintain law and order, to maintain security and to manage the health
and safety of staff and prisoners. It is a violation for any authority figure to deny ... Show more
The behavior demonstrated by both Stanford and Abu Ghraib prison stripped inmates of their
identity by contributing to harmful behavior. The external attribution affected the guards, individual
personality their morals and ethics. Working in the prison as a correctional officer for ten years I
took my oath seriously and my belief was firm and fair. As a correctional officer we have a
responsibility and a job to perform but one must always keep in mind our job is not punish an
inmate, there punishment is prison. Inmates can't stand up for themselves it's the inmates versus the
officers to punish a prisoner is an example of taking the law into your own hands, and this makes
one no better or different than the inmate. We are to uphold the law not manipulate or use our
authority because we can. I use to state to other officers the uniform does not make me, my
character remains the same in and out of

America's Accountability to its Constitution and the...
Our constitution is built upon the ideas of freedom and decency. After all, it was written after
hundreds of years worth of tyranny both at home in England (at the time), and abroad. People were
standing against oppression leveled against them from thousands of miles away (for example, the
Boston Tea Party), and they were called traitors to the Crown. Today, if someone speaks out against
the US and its oppression, or chooses to fight back, we call him an insurgent or a terrorist. It's quite
a twist. Our country was built upon the values laid out in the constitution, and any individual
working in the name of the US is absolutely bound by these truths. There is nothing which permits a
violation of this; no reason can be which excuses such ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Trying to argue against that point would be somewhere on the order of arguing against gravity. The
pictures speak for themselves (Unauthored). And also consider this: the woman who took the
infamous Abu Ghraib photographs was "...convicted by a court–martial, in May of 2005, of
conspiracy to maltreat prisoners, dereliction of duty, and maltreatment, and sentenced to six months
in prison, a reduction in rank, and a bad–conduct discharge (Gourevitch)." So the debate of whether
or not Abu Ghraib was torture seems moot. From there, it would seem absurd to argue in support of
it anywhere, in any country, for any reason. It is undeniable that what went on at Abu Ghraib was
never a series of isolated incidents, which were unbeknownst to the military leadership. It is
Taguba's opinion that this would not be possible (Hersh). Any person in the military is taught from
day one to follow orders. The woman in charge of the prison at the time was Janis Karpinski, an
Army reserve brigadier general, although she was not stationed there very long. It was the report
written by Taguba which exposed the "...sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses," which
occurred there (Hersh). It would seem quite unreasonable that one could think that an Army General
would embark upon a random course of such insane violence, on such a wide scale. And if you look
at the fact that similar activities occurred in Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan, it would certainly
paint a

The Massacre And Abu Ghraib Torture Prison
The My Lai massacre and the Abu Ghraib torture prison were both tragic events in history that
Americans were involved in. The My Lai massacre took place during the Vietnam war in 1968.
Lieutenant William Calley ordered the Charlie Company to proceed with the attack on the village of
My Lai. Their goal was to exterminate the Viet Cong combatants and any one who stood in their
way, but they ended up killing hundreds of innocent unarmed civilians instead. The Abu Ghraib
torture and prison was an american military run prison that was active during the Iraqi war in 2003
until 2006. They captured Iraqi soldiers and tortured them in extremely inhumane and unimaginable
ways. These horrific occurrences made an impact on a countless amount of communities and
people's lives around the world whether they had connections to the incidents or not, which is why
this issue is such an important matter to discuss. The concepts that will be discussed in this essay are
the similarities between the events of the My Lai massacre and Abu Ghraib prison, the major
difference between the two, considering who was truly responsible for the events at the Abu Ghraib
prison, discussing whether or not the lessons of My Lai were learnt, and the steps to take to insure
nothing alike these events would ever take place in the world again. There are several similarities
that are comparable between the My Lai Massacre and the Abu Ghraib prison torture. Both incidents
were extremely devastating events that

Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal Essay
In "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," Marianne Szegedy–Maszak informs the
reader of the situation United States guards caused against Iraqi detainees. Under Bush's presidency,
United States soldiers brought physical abuse and humiliation upon the Abu Ghraib Prison.
Szegedy–Maszak briefly analyzes the situation and compares the abuse to further scientific
experiments in which test obedience. One of the experiments was the topic of another article titled,
"The Stanford Prison Experiment," written by Philip G. Zimbardo. In his work, Zimbardo discusses
the experiment he held at Stanford University. A group of male students from the university were
paid to participate in an experiment held in a mock prison. Half of the group ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
In his article "The Social Contract and Human Rights," Grant effectively shares the importance of
human rights to society. He believes even meager obedience to inadequate authority is unethical by
stating, "When obedience is either enforced through conquest or slavery, or is simply the result of
blind and unthinking compliance with the law, there is no free, intelligent, and conscious choice
involved" (Grant 18). In situations like the Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal, Grant would confirm human
rights given to the guards were lacking, which allowed them to conform with the social pressures of
law enforcement. While testing obedience in his experiment, Zimbardo encountered a contrary
thought. For his specific experiment, the subjects were assigned consent paperwork and monetary
reward for participation. The right to discontinue one's experience was given; however, specific
instructions to perform the roles were not. After he distributed nearly zero guidelines to his
experimental guards, Zimbardo discovered, "...the guards became more aggressive, prisoners
became more passive" (Zimbardo 106). The test required only one individual to commence the
abuse for the other subjects to follow along. The editors of ABC News Primetime would agree with
this, as a shocking story from a Texas McDonalds was shared during their "Basic Instinct 5:
Milgram Experiment Re–visited" program. Similarly, all the trouble was due to one

The Chilling Torture at Abu Ghraib Prison Essay
When the news of torture at Abu Ghraib prison broke in early 2004 during the "global war on
terror," much of the public was outraged and did not know how to react. Heavy debate began over
the issue and media reporters on the issues took sides. Many books were written about the subject.
The conservatives attempted to downsize the issues and take the side that it was simply 'bored' and
'tense' soldiers trying to blow off a little steam with horseplay. However, the photographs that
surface said quite differently. Naked photographs of prisoners engaged in simulated sexual acts,
deceased prisoners in sexual poses and prisoners tied up and left for dead tell the chilling story of
the terror and torture behind the prison walls. Did the US do ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I feel as though these are not the isolated actions of a few "bad apples," but rather is carefully laid
out and systematic torture. This war was kick started to overthrow the rain and restore democracy in
Iraq. This was a war for human rights of Iraqi people. Marxist criminology is just one of the
criminological schools. It is very much centered on the work of structural functionalism
criminologists and parallels it very closely on the focus of what produces 'stability and continuity in
society.' However, it is different in the approach in the sense that it looks at a predestined 'political
philosophy.' Marxists focus on why things change and are quick to identify what disrupts life in
industrialized nations. They describe how society is divided up into slices and how slices of the pie
include power, wealth, prestige, and the perceptions of the world. Most theories of crime tend to be
'ahistorical.' "They do not treat the question of how the material conditions of society and crime
evolve together as relevant to the study of crime" (Chambliss, 1974, page 25). For Marxists this is a
problem because ahistorical theories fail to link the phenomenon under investigation – in this case,
crime. Ahistorical theories attempt to reason that crime occurs outside of social systems and is
something that develops on its own. Two important elements develop

Factors In Abu Ghraib And The Stanford Prison Experiment
Introduction The events that took place in Abu Ghraib and the disastrous results of the Stanford
prison experiment are related because of their determining factors. The drastic actions that took
place can be tied into the routine activities theory. As stated previously, these events are based on not
having anyone suitable in control, which can also tie into the mistreatment of children or the elderly
by their in–home care person(s). What took place? From what we know of these two horrible events,
we can determine that they can both be summarized as the disgusting mistreatment of human lives.
The strange thing is, that though they are so similar in fundamental reasoning, they occurred under
drastically different situations and time periods. The earlier incident, The Stanford prison
experiment, took place in the summer of 1971. (Haney, Zimbardo, 2008) The experiment was
carried out by the psychology department of Harvard, students and some administrators from the
psych. department turned certain floors of their building into a make–shift jail. This jail had multiple
cells, cots for prisoners, even a solitary confinement room. These areas were actually just offices
and closets that had been transformed to make the experiment seem more real for the participants.
Said participants were young males that applied to be in the experiment and were payed for their
participation. The young men were randomly assigned to their placement as guard or prisoner. The
experiment seemed

Torture At Abu-Ghraib
The "Torture at Abu Ghraib" was a horrible event that took place around 2004 where prisoners were
taken and dehumanized. A total of 3,800 of detainees were in the prison when the dehumanizing was
taken place by making men of Islamic culture preform homosexual acts on each other. In addition to
this, the guards of the prison would have these people completely nude and chain them to the doors
of the cells with others around. When the military guards were prosecuted and brought to trial
because of these horrendous acts bestowed on these prisoners most of them said that they were "just
following orders". Which, as bad as it sounds, could pose an explanation for what happened at the
Abu Ghraib prison. More into this, a researcher by the name of

Abu Ghraib Torture Essay
The acts of torture performed on the inmates at Abu Ghraib were both cruel and inhumane. But what
if the reason the guards tortured the inmates was due to the result of obedience from their superiors.
The cause of the torture of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib could have stemmed from situational factors
instead of the will of a few aggressive soldiers. Authority figures that use persuasive methods can be
very influential. There are many circumstantial possibilities as to why the guards treated the
prisoners cruelly. Most people don't attribute the torture to many situational and external causes. In
this case, most people attribute the torture to the internal faults of the guards when it could very well
be outside sources at fault. Fear ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Issue involvement is a type of involvement in which the attitudinal issue under consideration has
important consequences for the self" (Franzoi, 2003, Pg 217). Once again, fear could have been an
issue in the persuasion of the guards. The guards realized that they had to do their jobs and act in
compliance with orders or face the consequences. In many of the torture pictures at Abu Ghraib, the
prisoners are wearing bags on their heads or something to mask their face. The supervisors of the
jail could have masked the inmates to make the guards feel less responsible about the vicious acts.
Since the victim was masked and cannot tell who is torturing them, a kind of separation is created
between the guard and the inmate. "The results are also unequivocal in relation to the distance from
the direct exertion of violence: the greater the distance, the less the subjects feel responsible and the
greater the obedience" (Meeus & Raaijmakers 159). By masking the prisoners a sense of
deindividualization and lack of self–awareness occurred because the soldier knows that the inmate
does not know who he/she is. "Without such self–awareness, the deindividuated don't think of
themselves as separate individuals and do not attend to their own inner values and behavioral
standards" (Franzoi 336). With this sense of deindividualization, the guards performed actions they
normally would not ever do. Since they remained anonymous with the

Case Study Of Abu Ghraib
Torture and state authorities: a case study of Abu Ghraib Persion
ABSTRACT
Iraqi prisoners subjected to torment and abuse at Abu Ghraib jail may keep on suffering from critical
physical and mental results of their mishandle. This article reports two instances of Iraqi people
supposedly tormented at Abu Ghraib. Itemized legal assessments were led around one year after
their man touch as per worldwide rules. The discoveries of these assessments substantiate their
charges of torment and affirm the significant wellbeing results of torment. Moreover, these cases
bolster attestations that man grip of detainees was not restricted to being executed by watchmen, but
rather additionally happened efficiently with regards to cross examinations. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Yet, the photos just start to recount the tale of occasions that happened at Abu Ghraib and their
inheritance. Reports of abuse of Abu Ghraib detainees have fundamentally depicted the conduct of
watchmen, trained to "mellow up the detainees" pending cross examination, as opposed to
mishandle amid cross examinations themselves. There has been no revealing of legal assessments of
prisoners or previous prisoners at Abu Ghraib and sparse discourse of the potential wellbeing effect
of abuse of prisoners. In February 2005, I led scientific assessments of two Iraqi natives who
detailed being tormented and beforehand abused by U.S. experts while detained at Abu Ghraib and
different U.S. offices in Iraq. The assessments were led in Amman Jordan at the demand of the TV
news magazine indicate "a hour Weekday."These two people were alluded to "a hour Weekday" by
lawyers working with the Center for Constitutional Rights. The lawyers are speaking to them in a
claim that incorporates 143 different offended parties, looking for responsibility and reparations for
the offended parties' asserted abuse while kept by U.S. experts in Iraq. The two people assessed
gone from

What Can Social Psychology Teach Us About What Happened At...
What can social psychology teach us about what happened at Abu Ghraib? By Mandy Stead During
the Iraq war that between 2003 and 2006, the united states army committed a series of human rights
violations against prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison near Bagdad. The violations included murder,
sexual and physical abuse, rape, torturer, sodomy, humiliating and dehumanizing prisoners. In 2004
the abuse that was carried out was exposed by the publication of images that were taken by the
soldiers that carried out the violations. This paper will be looking at what social psychology can
teach us about what happened at Abu Ghraib. The abuse took place in tier 1A on the night shift. The
soldiers involved were all reserve soldiers who were not prepared or trained for this mission. They
were asked to interrogate the detainees 'take the gloves off' to extract information out of them. The
soldiers were pressured into crossing the line to gain information by the centre intelligence agency,
tier 1A was known as the interrogation hold. One detained was mentally ill, he covered himself in
faeces every day, the soldiers would have to role him in sand so he wouldn't smell so bad and they
named him 'Shitboy'. What was he doing in an interrogation hold? This is one example that shows
the level of humiliation and dehumanisation that went on. Philip Zimbardo was an expert witness for
U.S. Army Reserve Staff Sgt. Ivan "Chip" Frederick, who was convicted of five charges of abusing
prisoners, including

Abu Ghraib Prison Analysis
In 2008, Iraq Memory Foundation founder Kanan Makiya said in an interview with the Washington
Post, "The U.S. has not committed atrocities in Iraq that are even remotely comparable to what
Saddam did." A prolific writer on Saddam Hussein's regime and an Iraqi himself, Makiya has
written extensively on the power of violence and fear in modern Iraq. This paper argues the
enduring legacy of violence within Iraq left by Saddam Hussein's regime, specifically referencing
his human rights abuses at Abu Ghraib prison. In an attempt to fully examine the rise and
continuation of institutional torture within Iraq, this paper will explore the building of Abu Ghraib
prison in the late 1960s, and subsequently examine Saddam Hussein's rise to power beginning with
his joining of the Ba'athist party in 1956. Following the introductory historical background begins
an examination of the effects of, and responses to, Saddam's human rights abuses during his reign.
The final portion of this paper examines the U.S's use of torture within Iraq, and human rights
violations following Saddam Hussein execution in 2006, concluding with final remarks on the state
of Abu Ghraib prison today and what it represents for the future.
The Building of Abu Ghraib Prison & the Rise of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
American architect Edmund Whiting designed the prison, which was built in the early 1960s by
British contractors. Situated twenty miles west of the capital city of Baghdad, Abu Ghraib was built
to resemble supermax prisons that had already been established in Britain and the U.S. It opened for
the first time in 1970. This history and controversy surrounding the establishment of supermax
prisons is too immense to cover in this paper. However, to understand how the institutional torture at
Abu Ghraib came to exist requires an understanding of the features that qualify prisons for the
supermax

Tuskegee Experiment Compare And Contrast Zimbardo And Abu...
Did you know that for forty years the United States Public Health Services did an experiment that
was conducted on hundreds of African American men that suffered from the late stages of syphilis?
Well they did. This experiment is called the 'Tuskegee Experiment'. The men they researched were
mostly illiterate sharecroppers from one of the poorest counties in Alabama. The U.S. Public Health
Services never told the men what disease they suffered from, or its seriousness. The men were told
they were being treated for "bad blood". The researchers never had the motive to cure the infected
men. The data was collected from the autopsies of the deceased men that were left to decay from the
illness. The study was supposedly meant to discover how ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The 'Stanford prison experiment', or the 'Zimbardo experiment', influenced Abu Ghraib in Iraq. The
Abu Ghraib is to toughen up prisoners who misbehaved. Nobody would've known about Abu
Ghraib, if photos were not revealed. Zimbardo's experiment showed how people respond to a cruel
environment without clear rules. Dr. Zimbardo put an ad in the paper for healthy male volunteers.
With the flip of a coin they decided who would imitate the guards and who would imitate the
prisoners. The guards wore all khaki, with sunglasses. An imitation guard said, "If you mask your
identity it can make you behave in ways you wouldn't normally behave without a mask on." The
prisoners were given a smock with a number on it. The number was their new identity for the
experiment. They also got a chain and lock around their one foot to remind them, that their freedom
was "lost". Each day the simulated guards would taunt the fake prisoners. Experimental prisoner
number 8612, was the first to have an emotional breakdown. The fourth day in, things got very
sexual, and the guards loved to humiliate the prisoners. Every day a prisoner had a mental
breakdown. After 6 days, Dr. Zimbardo shut down the experiment. The power of the situation
changed everyone in the experiment, including Dr.

The Women Of Abu Ghraib Analysis
In the "The Women of Abu Ghraib," Francine D'Amico believes that both man and woman could do
good things and bad things in their life. D'Amico also talks about the sexual abused that happen in
the prison. The term 'sex' became the weapon in the Iraq prison. Lucinda Marshall discusses about
woman as a victim of sexual pornography. These Iraq women were rape by American soldier, and
these soldier proud of what he did as he took the photograph of it. Many rape actions happened
because Iraq women did not get protection even from their own family. However, the soldier who
was knows as a rapper, was humiliated and tortured by women. Miles in the reading also talks about
the photograph of Lynndie, who stood next to the naked prisoners. This photograph ... Show more
Both of them point out that she was a nice woman who loved to hear other laugh, and hated to see
children live in the prison because of who their father was. They also show the M.P. behaviors. The
M.P. never gave awards to the prisoners, they never tried to remember the prisoner's name, and often
gave punishments to them. The writers also discuss that Harman loved photography and she took
every moment that she loved without thinking further. However, she pointed out as a murdered, as
she took a picture of a dead body. Both Gourevitch and Morris believed that she innocent even
though she charged because of maltreatment.
In "Abu Ghraib Abuse Photos 'Show Rape'," the writer talks about rape and sexual abused that
happen in the Abu Ghraib prison. Many women and men were forced to undress, and even there was
a picture of a who was forced to do sex with the male soldier. Mr. Obama believed that these
pictures can put American troops in big danger, and inflame the public opinion. However, Mr.
Obama emphasis that the pictures were not more painful that what was actually happening in Abu

Summary Of Abuse At Abu Ghraib
"I asked several people, several times, where I could find a copy of the standard operating
procedures, or even rules and regulations,' says Frederick. 'And nobody would ever provide me with
any or let me know where they were. The only thing they would do is just give me a pat on the back
and say everything will be all right" (60 Minutes, Abuse at Abu Ghraib) This is Sergeant Chip
Frederick, one of the soldiers that has been convicted of conspiracy, dereliction of duty,
maltreatment of detainees, assault, and indecent acts. He served 8 years in military prison, in
Washington D.C. Even though Sgt. Frederick plead guilty, he claimed that no one involved in the
scandal was properly trained, and did not know the standard Geneva Conventions. "We had no
support, no training whatsoever. And I kept asking my ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the amount of people being sent to prison increased, the army couldn't keep up with rising
numbers. "There was– when I left, there was over 900 inmates. There was only five soldiers plus
two non–commissioned officers in charge for those 900– over 900 inmates" said Sgt. Frederick (60
Minutes, Abuse at Abu Ghraib). For every guard there is roughly 128 prisoners. At most United
States prisons, it is supposed to be for every guard there is five inmates. When 60 minutes
interviewed Sgt. Frederick, he was asked about the treatment of prisoners. "We learned a little bit of
Arabic, basic commands. And they didn't want to listen, so sometimes, you would just give them a
little nudge or something like that just to get them to cooperate so we could get the mission
accomplished" answered Sgt. Frederick (Abuse at Abu Ghraib). Soldiers in Abu Ghraib reported that
they needed to sometimes "get rough" with the inmates in order to remain in control and make sure
the prisoners listened to them (60 Minutes, Abuse at Abu Ghraib). In the end one of the biggest
causes of the scandal was lack of training and how understaffed the prison

Is Abu Ghraib : How Good People Turn Evil?
Social Psychology Week 8 For this week's discussion I was given, Genocide to Abu Ghraib: How
good people turn evil. Abu Ghraib prison was a US Army detention center for captured Iraqis from
2003 to 2006. An investigation into the treatment of detainees at the prison was started by the
unearthing of graphic photos showing guards abusing detainees in 2003. According to Fiske et al.,
(2010), aggression is generally defined as any behavior that is intended to harm another person who
does not want to be harmed; it is an external behavior that can't be seen, that isn't thought in
someone's mind and is a social behavior (p.833). In 2007, Zimbardo published The Lucifer Effect:
How Good People Turn Evil, a book based on the Stanford Prison ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
24). The report also faults multiple leaders for failing to conduct needed training after deployment
(Taguba, 2004, p. 24). According to Zimbardo (2007) and Bartone (2008), contextual factors alone
are not enough to explain why some individuals engaged in, and/or tolerated prisoner abuse–one
also must consider the psychological personality factors that played a role in fostering the abuse and
torture of prisoners. Bartone (2008), suggested three theoretical perspectives and the two
dispositional factors I will use for this discussion are: Lack of Hardiness: "Hardiness is a personality
style that predicts who will be resilient, thrive and remain healthy under stress versus who is more
likely to suffer. Recent work shows that hardiness also influences short– and long–term mental
health adjustment to major stressors, including war–related stressors (Bartone, 2008, p.5).
Psychological Development: Bartone (2008), suggested that Kegan (2004) third–order of
consciousness could explain from a developmental perspective, how Soldiers in the Abu Ghraib
situation could have tolerated and participated in prisoner abuse. In Dr. Kegan 's work, he outlines
Five Orders of Consciousness: First Order:

Abu Ghraib Prison Analysis
ISIS is located in Syria, Iraq, Jordan and other parts of the Middle East. The group's methods are
exceptionally brutal. The group began very different form in 1999. Al–Qaeda and ISIS are very
similar but different and share a lot of history. In July 2012 Iraq Reopens Notorious Abu Ghraib
Prison as Baghdad Central Prison this is called the great ISIS prison break. One chapter of the story
of ISIS's rise that very rarely gets mentioned: spectacular series of attacks on Iraqi prisons in 2012
and 2013. This prison break supplied it with a huge infusion of recruits, ISIS took advantage of the
Iraqi government's weakness. People for all types of crimes were recruited. ISIS won rapid infusion
of man power. April 2013: ISIS officially becomes ISIS– ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Some of those major events are, in October 2006–al–Qaeda leader Abu Yyub al–Masri announces
the creation of Islamic State of Iraq, and establishes AbuOmar al–Baghdadi as its leader. April 2010,
Abu Bakr al–Baghdadi becomes leader of ISIS after Abu Omar al– Baghdadi and Abu Ayyub al–
Masri are killed in a joint U.S. Iraqi operation. In May 2014 ISIS kidnaps more than 140 Kurdish
schoolboys in Syria, forcing them to take lessons in radical Islamic theology, according to London–
based monitoring group Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. In June 9–10 ISIS frees up to 1,000
prisoners. Then later in June on the 30th, The Pentagon announces the United States is sending an
additional 300 troops to Iraq, bringing the total U.S. forces in Iraq to nearly 800. Troops and military
advisers are sent to Iraq to support Iraqi security forces and help protect the United States embassy
and the airport in Baghdad. September 2, 2014 ISIS releases a video showing the beheading of
United States journalist Steven Sotloff. September 23 the United States carries out airstrikes against
ISIS. In October 2014 ISIS releases a video showing the apparent beheading of hostage Alan
Henning, in this same video ISIS threatens the life of American aid worker Peter Kassig, also known
as Abdul–Rahman Kassig. On November 16th 2014, ISIS militants claim to have beheaded
American hostage Peter Kassig in a video published to the Internet. He is the fifth westerner whom
ISIS claims to have beheaded via video messages. On January 24, 2015, 2015 An ISIS supporter
posts an online video of hostage Kenji Goto, holding a photo of beheaded hostage Haruna Yukawa.
The video includes a demand for the release of terror suspect Sajida al–Rishawi, from Jordan, in
exchange for Kenji Goto. Then on January 31st ISIS releases a video online showing the decapitated
body of journalist Kenji Goto. On February 6, 2015 in an online post, ISIS claims

Essay On Zimbardo Experiment
Philip Zimbardo is an emeritus professor at the Stanford University and has spent the past 50 years
studying and teaching psychology. With a Ph.D. from Yale University, Zimbardo specializes and
focuses on several areas such as terrorism, madness and evil. Zimbardo is most well known for the
infamous Stanford Prison Study that was carried out in 1971. The experiment tested college students
and their tendency to attribute the causes of their behavior to personal factors and the chances of
underestimating the influence of situational conditions. The aim of his experiment was to reveal how
social roles might influence a person's behavior. Twenty–four college students were asked to role–
play as prisoners (twelve) and guards (twelve) for a course of two–weeks. By the sixth day of the
experiment, Zimbardo (superintendent) had to stop the whole study due to the lack of ethical
consideration. All participants were stripped of their personal belongings and dressed into clothing
that suited their roles. Prisoners wore prison clothing and were given beddings. Prison guards were
dressed in a khaki uniform, with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Just like in the experiment he conducted, the lack of training, experience and supervision was also
present at Abu Ghraib as well as the "same psychological forces". Soldiers were commissioned at
positions they had never been in or had training for. General Janis Karpinski, was an Army reserve
brigadier general and was put in charge of all the military prisons in Iraq. She was the only female
commander in the war zone and had experience from the 1991 Gulf War and with operations and
intelligence with the Special Forces. Though she had never ran a prison before, she was in command
of eight battalions, three large jails thirty four hundred members of the military reserve forces,
whom like her had no experience in managing prisons or

FOB Abu Ghraib: A Short Story
"ATTACK" yelled Tom with his booming voice. Tom is in the US Army, fighting against Iraq. Tom
leads a charge on Iraq.
"Get up, we need to get ready." said General Carl demandingly. General Carl was one of the few
General's at an army base called FOB Abu Ghraib in Iraq.
"Yes sir." said Tom. Tom got up and got into his uniform. Tom was a First Lieutenant and working
on a mission in Iraq.
"Tom, I need you to test something for me." exclaimed General Carl. "It is something very
important that only the people who built it and I know about."
"Yes sir, I will test it with you." said Tom. His curiosity was rising, and so was his anxiousness.
When Tom got to the building, Carl had to put in a code so the door would open. "Here we are, the
lab!" ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was looking at a suit with full body armor, with glass protecting the eyes. And there was a gun
laying right next to it.
"This is what you will be testing for me. It is called the TALOS, the Tactical Assault Light Operator
Suit and we just finished constructing it recently." said Carl. He unlocked the door and they stepped
inside. "Try it on, see how it feels."
"Ok." said Tom. He put the suit on, and his large torso and short legs fit well inside the suit. And
then, something weird happened. People came out with big guns and started shooting at him. He
didn't feel a single bullet hit him, he just heard TOINK sounds when the bullets hit him. "THIS IS
SO COOL!" yelled Tom. Once the shooting was done, Carl explained to Tom what the suit was
going to be used for.
"We are planning to use this suit when we attack Iraq later today, and you will be in the suit during
the attack." said General Carl. Later in the day, Tom went back to the building with General Carl,
and strapped on the suit and picked up the gun. "Ok, so we will be attacking in thirty minutes, so
you better be prepared." said General Carl. Tom waited for the thirty minutes, and was learning how
to load up the gun. When thirty minutes was up, the attack

Differences And Similarities Between Stanford Prison...
There are many similarities between the behavior of the wardens in Stanford Prison Experiment and
the behavior of the soldiers at the prison in Abu Ghraib. I think the first and most obvious
comparison would be the blatant misuse and abuse of power. In both instances the figures in
authority were aware of their ability to make demands that their subordinates had to comply with,
and they took full advantage of it.
We see this expressed in emotional abuse that the prisoners had to endure. In both cases we forced to
perform demeaning tasks for no apparent reason. There were a number instances where the prisoners
were forced to be nude and were taunted. In the Stanford Prison Experiment the inmates were teased
about their genitals while in Abu

Abu Ghraib Analysis
After watching the video on the MP's in Abu Ghraib, I would have to say that the whistleblower
acted in authority as an MP to report his cohorts. As for the 7 that were accused of the crime, they
acted in social conformity. I feel like it was a think group gone wrong. the ringleader had a more
powerful personality than the others, so he lead them along. I believe the thinking came from the
idea that those people were the enemy and should be treated as if they were. Often times when
people are exposed to traumatic situations they lose the ability to make choices on there own as well
as the sense of what is right and wrong. I am not making excuses for their actions. However, I think
in a case of war the whole idea of right and wrong could easily be lost. when people are dealing with
trauma and they have no idea how to comprehend like In such case they follow the lead of the
strongest personality to get them though. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The one up game began and quickly got out of control. this is often the case with bordom. It
happens a lot in real prisons. People get bored and need a stimulant to pass the time. often that
results in victimization, a distraction, or some other forms of socialization. The need for power and
control is a pretty predominate characteristic in all of the settings both the real life and said
controlled experiments. your either the in–group or the out–group both groups think they are the in–
group. Either side has a ringleader in the Zimbardo experiment it was inmate 8162. He claimed he
was bored and thought it would pass time to stir things up. as for that real life issue with the MP, that
was very much a social conformity matter. the whole town was in an uproar over him telling on the
hero. perhaps in another town like Seattle that would not have been the

Abu Ghraib Scandal
The war in Iraq began in March of 2003. During this war personnel of the United States Army and
the Central Intelligence Agency committed a chain of human rights violations. This was against
prisoners in the Abu Ghraib Prison, which was in Iraq. These violations included torture, sodomy,
sexual and physical abuse, rape, and murder. The abuse captured public attention and was
widespread. The incidents received widespread condemnation both within the United States and
abroad, because of the photographs and publication of the abuse by the news in April of 2004.
Meanwhile, the soldiers received support from some conservative media within the United States.
The administration of George W. Bush was not loyal. They attempted to portray the abuse as
isolated incidents. They tried not to make it indicative of general U.S. policy. It was a challenge for
organizations such as Red Cross, and Human Rights Watch. According to the article from
Wikipedia, "After multiple investigations, these organizations stated that the abuses at Abu Ghraib
were not isolated incidents, but were part of a wider pattern of torture and brutal treatment at
American overseas detention centers, including those in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay."
The author of the article at Washington times stated that "The Abu Ghraib scandal exploded in ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bush mainly impacted him but impacted American citizens as well. George Bush became president
in the year 2000. One year later the 9/11 attack happened and his job approval rating reached 86
percent because of the attack. During the Abu Ghraib Scandal, between the year 2003 and 2004 his
job approval rating dropped by 13 percent, which brought it down to 74.82 percent because of his
actions. As the President of the United States, their 'job approval rating should not drop but only 1 to
5 percent every year or two. This stands out because who wants a president whose job approval
ratings drop at least 13%

Torture in Abu Ghraib Essays
The author Allen S. Keller, M.D., is the director of the Bellevue Hospital Center and belongs to the
member's advisory council on human rights. (p.558) He is well known for his advocacy on the
various use of torture tactics used on Iraqi prisoners and other refuges. During a Congressional
meeting Mr. Keller stated "To think that abusive methods, including the enhanced interrogation
techniques [in which Keller included waterboarding], are harmless psychological ploys is
contradictory to well established medical knowledge and clinical experience." ("CNN", 2007)
In this paper, I summarize the article and identify relevant information and any changes that may
have occurred since the publication of this article. I will also offer comments and ... Show more
That there are long term physical and psychological consequences of torture in regards to Iraqi
detainees due to months of abuse and mistreatment. The lack of sound medical professionals also
needs to be called to attention. Upon the interviewing and debriefing the detainee victims in this
case, resulted in significant long term physical and psychological suffering. Forensic psychological
evaluations tests such as the Istanbul protocol were conducted on both former Iraqi detainees of Abu
Ghraib. (Keller, 2006) The use of this test confirmed the significant amount of torture both
physically and psychologically.
Although Keller offered persuasive evidence to support his analysis of significant psychological
trauma, from mistreatment during imprisonment, Keller has failed to prove his case on long term
physical trauma as a result of abuse. However he proved beyond a doubt that both detainees indeed
do suffer and continue to suffer psychological stress do to abuse endured. One psychological
stressor proven is both individuals suffer from PTSD (post–traumatic stress disorder) as a direct
result of imprisonment and abuse of which prior to imprisonment and some investigations, both
individuals were psychologically sound. While both allegations of torture and abuse documented in
the article

Dr Zimbardo's Fault In The Case Of Abu Ghraib
The evidence from Stanford suggests that, according to Maria Konnikova, certain institutions and
environments demand those behaviors–and, perhaps, can change them. No institution or
environment on this planet demands the behaviors seen in Abu Ghraib or The Stanford Experiment.
The environment and leadership at the time of Abu Ghraib had a hand in this unfortunate incident.
In Dr. Zimbardo's Op–Ed piece in the Boston Globe he says those responsible should suffer severe
sanctions if found guilty, and we must separate guilt from blame. Being an active duty member in
the Navy, whenever there is a serious incident or accident blame is always investigated for. Who do
we blame? Depending on the incident or accident, the lowest man on the totem pole

Essay about The Human Right Violations at Abu Ghraib
The Human Right Violations at Abu Ghraib
In 1949, the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War was created to
prohibit immoral, cruel and degrading punishment toward prisoners during wartime. The United
States ratified this covenant and became a member of the Geneva Conventions. During Operation
Iraqi Freedom, a series of human abuses occurred from October through December of 2003 where
American military personnel have conducted acts of brutality and immoral behavior toward Iraqi
detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison. The inhumane "interrogation method" of the American military
have clearly violated Article 2 and 4 of the Geneva Conventions. Article 2.2 states "No exceptional
circumstances whatsoever, whether a state ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The responsibility of this failure is institutional as well as personal at higher levels.
Abu Ghraib and the Root Causes of Abuse
When President Bush declared the War on Terror after the incident of September 11, 2001, he was
declaring a new kind of war on a different kind of enemy. The al–Qaeda terrorist group who were
responsible for the destruction of World Trade Center is organized differently than any enemy that
the U.S. has faced before. Since the terrorists were determined to target large numbers of American
civilians, the Bush administration issued a memorandum which declared the Geneva Conventions
cannot apply to unconventional combatants such as al–Qaeda, it states " I accept the legal
conclusion of the Department of Justice and determine that none of the provisions of Geneva apply
to our conflict with al Qaeda in Afghanistan or elsewhere through the world because; among other
reasons al Qaeda is not a High Contracting Party to Geneva. (Bush 2002)"
In 2002, the Office of Legal Counsel responded to the President's request of exploring the question
whether American officials have the right to use torture against suspected terrorists. Assistant
Attorney General Jay S. Bybee of the Office of Legal Counsel not only legalized the use of torture
for U.S. officials but also defined torture in the narrowest way. He defines torture as inflicting
physical pain, or any serious physical injury such as failure of organs or at the most

The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal : Sources Of Obedience
In the movie, "A Few Good Men", two types of reactions are shown in response to being part of a
person's wrongful death. Philip Zimbardo in his work, "The Stanford Prison Experiment", provides
the perspective of the guards who initiated a harsh prison environment and how they reflected upon
the experience. Meanwhile a real–life scandal is analyzed by Marianne Szegedy–Maszak in "The
Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism". This piece reviews the actions of soldiers in
controversial situations shortly after the infamous 9–11 attacks. Repeating the military topic,
Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton addressed Lt. Calley's steadfast belief that he did no wrong
in the Vietnam War scandal in "The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The relief was brought about by the reconciliatory act of disbanding the mock imprisonment early.
Sadie F. Dingfielder, a writer for Monitor on Psychology, writes an overview of many psychological
reports over the 'Redemptive Sequence'. In her article, it is lain out that people who speak of a
meaningful episode in their lives in a 'Redemptive Sequence', a story of where bad events lead to
positive outcomes, tend to be happier (Dingfielder 42). In the case of the Stanford Prison
Experiment, this pattern would be seen as the mistreatment being the bad event and the early release
as the positive outcome. Also seen in "A Few Good Men," Markinson was a part of the negative
event, covering up the Code Red, and sought after a positive outcome in assisting the case on the
side of the defense. In the very least, reconciliation can be derived in the display of grief at the loss
of a positive outcome Dingfielder speaks of. In "Just Do What the Pilot Tells You", Dalrymple
explained a personal experience with regret stemming from actions out of obedience. Through the
writing, it can be logically inferred that the author was grieving this experience with the situation
being prominent enough to remember such events. The lack of action to comfort those patients
under his care pushed Dalrymple into this grief. Gilovich and Medvec addressed in their article,
"The experience of regret: When, when, and why,"

Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Melissa Moore

More from Melissa Moore (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal