2. What is it?
…concerned with the new or the novel.
Is innovation technology based? Many of the more
significant innovations of the 20th century are
organizational rather than technology based.
3. Different types of Innovation give greater
profitability at different points in the life cycle of
a product family
New product
invention, tailoring,
Profitability
and development
Process Marketing
Application Business
Innovation Innovation
Innovation Model
Innovation Structural
Disruptive Product Innovation
Innovation Innovation
Time
10. Genuine uncertainty
› It’s not going to happen – certainly not now
Cannibalization
› It will compete with our current products
Shifts in the customer base
› Our current customers don’t want it
Margin erosion
› It will make less money
11. Time horizons & Incentives
Fear of (individual) cannibalization
Overload
Competency Traps
12. Who buys a technology
when it is first
introduced?
Performance
New technologies sell to:
- New customers
- With new needs
- Often at lower margins
Time
16. Dynamically continuous innovation:
A pronounced modification to an
existing product
› Requires a *moderate* amount of learning or
behavior change
› Convergence:
The coming together of two or more
technologies to create a new system with
greater benefits than its parts
17.
18. “ Disruptive innovation theory points to situations
in which new organizations can use relatively
simple, convenient, low-cost innovations to
create growth and triumph over powerful
incumbents.”
Sustaining versus Disruptive Innovation
19. Markets that don’t exist can’t be analyzed
The experts, including you, will be wrong
Don’t invest all your resources on the first effort
— beta release
Discovery, not implementation, based planning
20. Markets that don’t exist can’t be analyzed
The experts, including you, will be wrong
Don’t invest all your resources on the first effort
— beta release
Discovery, not implementation, based planning
21. Bring a difference value proposition to the
market
Initially under perform established products in
mainstream market
But, the products improve at a rapid rate
Superior in ways that are not valued by the
established market — more reliable, easier to
use, or cheaper
23. Performance
Overshot
Customers
Undershot
Customers
Time
24. Automated Electronic
Paper Library
Collections Paper Library Library
Bib Control Paper Collections Paper Collections Digital
Bib Control Electronic Bib Control Digital
1965-1995 1995-date
25. Automated Electronic
Paper Library
Collections Paper Library Library
Bib Control Paper Collections Paper Collections Digital
Bib Control Electronic Bib Control Digital
1965-1995 1995-date
Sustaining Many
Innovations Disruptive
Innovations
26. Browsing versus Search
Britannica versus Wikipedia
Journals versus Repositories
27. Browsing — requires prior arrangement, you
are putting things (usually books) in order on a
shelf
Problems
› Mind reading — guess what the user is thinking
› Fortune telling — make predictions about the future
28. Searching —
› “the only group that can categorize everything is
everybody”
› “One reason Google was adopted so quickly when it
came along is that Google understood there is no
shelf… Google can decide what goes with what after
hearing form the user.”
29. “The Web has an editor, it’s everybody. In a
world where publishing is expensive, the act of
publishing is also a statement of quality — the
filter comes before publication. In a world
where publishing is cheap, putting something
out there says nothing about quality. It’s what
happens after it gets published that matters. If
people don’t point to it, other people won’t read
it.”
30. Google versus traditional bibliographic control
Open Archives/Repositories versus journals
(and soon monographs?)
Google Book Project, Open Content Alliance
versus library collections
Reference librarians versus Yahoo/Google
Answers
38. New Product Development Process
Evaluate at each
Opportunity Identification stage to determine
Go/No Go whether to proceed.
Design
Go/No Go Key is to manage
Testing risk of introducing a
Go/No Go failure or not
Introduction introducing a
Go/No Go success.
Life-cycle Management
Proactive vs. Reactive
39. Success Rate Entirely New Products
3000 raw 125 beginning
300 submitted
ideas projects
ideas
.03% .8%
.3%
1.7 launches 4 major 9 large
60% developments developments
25% 11%
1 commercial
success
40. It’s a great little product,
but we’re still working on
packaging and handling
41.
42. New, familiar New , unfamiliar
Decreasing knowledge of the market
Familiar
Familiar New , familiar New , unfamiliar
Decreasing knowledge of the technology
43. Decreasing knowledge of the market
Market Business New Business
Expansion Expansion Model
Market Business Business
Extension Extension Expansion
Market Product Product
Penetration Extension Expansion
Decreasing knowledge of the technology
44. Probability of
Success
Market Business New Business
New Product with Expansion Expansion Model
unrelated technology in
existing market: 50%
Market Business Business
Extension Extension Expansion
Market Product Product
Penetration Extension Expansion
45. Market Business New Business
Expansion Expansion Model
Probability of Market Business Business
Success Extension Extension Expansion
Existing product in a new
Market Product Product
market: 15% Penetration Extension Expansion
46. Improved product in Market Business New Business
existing market: 75% Expansion Expansion Model
Market Business Business
Extension Extension Expansion
Market Product Product
Penetration Extension Expansion
47. Market Business New Business
Expansion Expansion Model
Market Business Business
Extension Extension Expansion
Probability of
Success
Market Product Product
Penetration Extension Expansion
New Product in a New
Market: 5%
48.
49. A company cannot rest on its laurels; many
product class winners have fallen victim to
their success
US Steel (steel)
ICI (chemicals)
Kodak (photography)
Goodyear (tires)
Polaroid (instant photography)
Zenith (TVs)
IBM (PCs)
Smith-Corona (typewriters)
50. The right product is one that becomes available at
the right time (i.e., when the market needs it), and
is better and/or less expensive that its competition.
To have the right product, therefore, one must:
Predict a market need
Envisage a product whose performance and
capability will meet that need
Develop the product to the appropriate time
scale and produce it.
Sell the product at the right price
51. There are, unfortunately, many examples of potentially
innovative space products being developed at the
wrong time, at the wrong price point, or due to poor
market predictions:
TV-SAT and TDF-SAT: Performance wrong (few high power
transponders when many medium/low power were needed)
OLYMPUS: Too soon (large busses only started to become
needed some years later)
IRIDIUM and GLOBALSTAR: Wrong market and/or too late
(development of GSM took away most of the market)
AIRPHONE: Too expensive
CONCLUSION? Introduce only Productive Innovation
52.
53.
54.
55. OTHER POSSIBILITIES???
Battery Powered Battery Charger?
Braille TV Guide?
Fireproof Matches?
Solar Powered Flashlight?
Sugar coated Insulin btablet?
.....
56.
57. › Innovation can be productive or wasteful. The
secret to success is being able to spot the
difference in advance and encourage the former.
This should be your goal!!
Editor's Notes
Conclusion? Innovation should have a composite definition: a process whereby a new idea is conceived and detailed in the mind, developed into a physical entity through detailed design, analysis, experimentation, and production, and then introduced to give a company a competitive edge.In simplest terms, however, innovation is simple change for the better.
Customization for different group of people
Product definition:A product is a physical good, service, idea, person or place that is capable of offering tangible and intangible attributes that individuals or organisations regard as so necessary, worthwhile, or satisfying that they are prepared to exchange money, patronage or some other unit of value in order to acquire it.
The client was able to prioritize the three top composite markets and applications. The company… Optimized their R&D spendAddressed needed improvements with their materials and technology Formulated an overall market entry strategy for the composites industryCreated an approach for the individual markets and applications. …resulting in years of time and millions of $ savings, allowing the company to confidently focus on executing a well developed plan.