Essay The Debate Over Same Sex Marriage

Essay The Debate over Same Sex Marriage
The Debate over Same Sex Marriage
Legislation is deeply entrenched in language and the continual process of interpretation. Laws are
created as a response to cultural and societal needs, wants and norms and are restructured and
interpreted as these desires and standards change over time. The importance of the words chosen
and the syntax used in order to translate society's standards into legislation are amplified over time
because they are continuously deconstructed, examined, and analyzed. As these laws are applied to
and challenged by society, policymakers must examine them and then change them through
discourse and dialogue. As current sentiments towards marriage are changing and shifting,
policymakers must begin to examine our ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his 1996 speech against the Defense of Marriage Act, John Kerry chose to speak not only of the
legal implications of the law but took the opportunity to step back from the politics of Washington
DC and consider the human, embodied, and gendered effect of this law on our Nation. John Kerry,
in 1996 and 2004, does not support a homosexual couple's right to marry yet he has spoken out
against proposed legislation which is based on the denial of a right to someone who is a
homosexual. In his speech, he criticizes the use of the word "defense" in the title of the act saying
that if it was truly concerned with defending marriage it would, " provide for counseling,"
"guarantee day care," and "expand protection of abused children" among many other things (232).
This, he argues, would be defending marriage against that which threatens it. In order to defend, one
must first be put on the defensive by offensive and threatening actions and behaviors. Marriage is
threatened by alcoholism, domestic violence, etc. but not by the fact that two people of the same
gender love each other.
Unlike Bush and the conservative voice on the issue of same–sex marriage, Kerry, and other
liberals, are not afraid of taking about the issue of gender and love when it comes to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Barack Obama Outline
Introduction Barack Obama, The 44th President of The United States Of America, Throughout the
years, United States Presidency we saw a lot of different Presidents who sometimes achieved some
great things in life and beat the odds in life. Barack was not the First minority to be selected for
Presidency. His Campaign was bigger than Hillary Clinton's, he Prevailed a problem in the
Economic Problems, Health Care, so much more he has Accomplished so much in this Country. In
the end all of his hard work and dedication paid off as President over these 8 years in the White
House. If i could say one thing to President Obama i would tell him thank you for helping our
country and so much more things he has done with healthcare and obamacare ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit, to choose our better history, to carry forward that
precious gift, that noble idea passed on from generation to generation: the God–given promise that
all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness"( The
American Presidency Project.) In his Speech he is quoting social issues in the world that needs to be
changed and that would get changed while he was in office. He was stating that it's no time to play
around and not do things it's time to finally put in work for the country and make history better
instead of worst in the past years and that skin color doesn't matter in God's eyes we're all the same
in the end no matter what you look like and whatever measure it takes we gonna find happiness in
the end of it

Why The 2016 Election Is Different
The upcoming United States 2016 presidential election is different from previous elections in many
ways. First, the importance of money has decreased more than expected. It was believed that the
candidate with the most financial backing, had a larger advantage. According to "Why the 2016
Election is Different", Gerald F. Seib explained how the financial front runner of the republican bid,
Governor Jeb Bush of Florida, ran an unsuccessful presidential campaign. Seib also explained how
Governor Scott Walker of Minnesota lost his presidential bid, while being backed by a heavily
funded super PAC. Money does not always determine a winner in the election process. In my
opinion, being financially supported is still key in running a successful campaign.

Is the Electoral College Process Still Relevant Today ?
!
!
The United States Electoral College system and its contemporary challenge
!
Is the Electoral College process still relevant today ?
!
For some of us – European people that are accustomed to the universal suffrage – the
Electoral College process and its outcome may seem a bit surprising. In the 2000 U.S. presidential
election, for example, more Americans voted for Gore, but Bush actually won the presidency
because he was awarded the majority of Electoral College votes. It's a political upset that's occurred
several times since the ﬁrst U.S. presidential election; four presidents have been elected by the
Electoral College after losing the popular vote.
We'll explore brieﬂy the historic start of the process and describe two original ... Show more content
The "Winner–Take–All" rule of election implies that states that employ this method ( Forty eight
states and Washington D.C, there are only two exceptions1 ) award its electors as a single
bloc.
Here is shown the exemple of the state of
New York and its results of the 2012
Presidential elections. The State has 29
Electoral Votes and the popular vote gave
4,485,877 votes (63,35 %) to Barack
Obama when Mitt Romney had
2,490,496 votes (35,17 %).
More than two millions of Americans expressed their preference for Romney, nonetheless, the
outcome is as if no one in this state had voted for Mitt Romney because all the 29 Electoral Votes
were awarded to the winner.
!
Maine and Nebraska use the "congressional district method", selecting one elector within each

congressional district by popular vote and selecting the remaining two electors by a statewide
popular vote.
!1
!3
In light of this brief presentation we understand better the term of "swinging state" : a victory in
California gives a candidate more than a ﬁfth of the number of electoral vote he needs to be
president.
Another peculiarity of the Electoral College system is the Faithlessness, as described before, it
characterises a situation where a member of the Electoral College does not vote for whom he or she
had pledged to vote.
Not every state has laws

John Edwards Chapter 7 Analysis
Upon reading about John Edwards and the downfall of his presidential campaign, several things
resonated within our group ranging from Edwards's shocking characterization in Chapter Seven to
the scandal that ruined his campaign in Chapter Nine.
Chapter Seven began by giving insight and background on John Edwards and his achievements
before he announced his bid for presidency. Edwards believed that he could take Hillary down,
completely disregarding Obama. Interestingly, he did not initially see Obama as threat. Edwards
believed that his involvement in the 2004 election, where he ran for president before he was
nominated to be John Kerry's running mate, would solidify the democratic nomination in 2008.
Essentially, Edwards thought that he was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The chapter mentioned that Hunter was sighted at hotels where John was staying, however we did
not believe he was foolish enough to continue his affair and jeopardize his campaign more.
Elizabeth stayed with John after being publicly humiliated and in return he humiliated her a second
time by impregnating his mistress.
Overall, our Game Change chapters were insightful and gave us a new perspective on John
Edwards, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. It was interesting reading about Hillary's tactics in the
previous election and comparing them to how she is executing her current campaign. However, the
most interesting aspect of our chapters was John Edwards and his arrogance. It was disappointing
how his ambitions were overshadowed by his personal

Barack Clinton And Donald Trump Essay
In the beginning, God said, "Let there be poverty," and there was poverty. Although this is obviously
false, poverty has been a growing problem in the United States since its founding in 1776. For
centuries, presidents have been conjuring up ways to cure this ongoing headache in our society with
policies and procedures that have been either somewhat successful or a complete failure. This year,
on November 8th, Americans will choose the next candidate who will try to defeat this problem
once again. The 2016 presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, have drastically
different views on how to attack poverty in America. Trump believes in the system of "trickle–down
economics", while Clinton seeks to raise the federal minimum wage while taxing the rich in order to
create a more fair economy. After comparing the policies of both candidates, I have concluded
Hillary Clinton's policies will more effectively address the problem of poverty in America.
In order to more clearly understand the severity of poverty in our nation, we must first look back to
the source of the issue. With the start of The Great Depression in the 1920s, economic downturn was
at it's worst. After the Stock Market Crash of 1929, millions of investors on Wall Street were
uprooted. This caused consumer spending to drastically decline over the next several years. With
this decrease in consumer spending, nearly 15 million Americans were laid off and half of the
country's banks failed. President

Should We Replace The Electoral College?
The United States, well known for its democracy, holds elections every four years to elect its
President. Every American citizen over the age of 18 has a right to cast a vote in the presidential
election. The voting process, although it seems easy and straightforward, can be very complicated.
In the 2000 election, Al Gore captured the majority of votes, but George Bush won. The reason for
this strange outcome and why Al Gore lost was because of the Electoral College. The Electoral
College is voting system where different states are given a certain amount of votes in the election,
and which ever candidate wins a state, is given that state's votes. The Electoral College is out of
date, and should be replaced by the Popular Vote system, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Although this is true, the wide selection of canidates would also allow the American people to have
a better selection of canidates. Instead of selecting two canidates which the electoral college
promotes, they can choose from a lot more, selecting a canidate which they can identify with, and
supports the issues they also support. The popular vote system presents a flawless way of electing a
president, with absolutely not threat of electing a minority president. It is the best voting system for
the United States and should be instated in place of the outdated electoral college. The Reform of
the Electoral College Imagine two candidates running for the presidency of a country. They are both
outstanding candidates, and it is a close race. Going into the days of the voting, no one knows who
is going win the election, and become the president. When the votes are tallied it shows that one
candidate received more overall votes from the people of the country than the other. He, obviously
being the favorite of the people, loses the election. Many of the people of the country are confused
why he lost the election even though he won the popular vote. The winning candidate won because
the country he won the presidency of, uses an outdated and flawed voting system. This candidate
assumes the presidency knowing that he does not have the support of more than half of the nation
that he is now

The 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton And Donald...
In United States politics, voters are frequently placed into smaller groups or cohorts based on their
social, economic, and even political views. The general public, pollsters, and even candidates will
assume that these groups or cohorts will vote similarly, regardless of the type or magnitude of
election. In the 2016 presidential election the two main candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump specifically targeted and campaigned towards some of these groups of voters in an effort to
try and win the presidency. Among these targeted groups were independent/third–party voters,
women, Millennials, African–Americans, Hispanics, and evangelical voters. One of the most
influential groups of voters in the 2016 election was the independent or ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In other words, these voters lean one way or the other, but would rather identify with a candidate
that has the same political ideologies that they have rather than an entire party's stance on the
plethora of social issues.
There are five primary types of independents, the "Disengaged", the "Disguised Partisan", the
"Deliberator", the "Disillusioned", and the "Dislocated". The "Disengaged" are individuals who are
just not politically inclined. This group is very unlikely to vote even though they are often
registered. The "Disguised Partisans" are people who are "independent in name only", as they claim
to be either independent or members of third parties but follow partisan lines. This group is
sometimes considered to be undercover independents. The "Deliberators" are model citizens, and
are open to both parties. Bipartisanship is important to the "Deliberators", they tend to vote for
candidates and not for a specific party. The "Disillusioned" are a group of people who are angry at
the current state of political affairs. Finally, the "Dislocated" are also truly a group of independents
because they do not really fit into either party. The "Dislocated" are socially liberal but fiscally
conservative. While it may seem as if voters choose to become members of third–parties or
independent for reasons due to their disdain for both of the parties, this may not be completely valid.
Most

The Word Posse Comitatus Sounds Like The Name Of A Made Up...
The word Posse Comitatus sounds like the name of a made–up secret society you would only ever
hear about by watching Dead Poets Society. Au contraire. The Latin to English translation of Posse
Comitatus is "power of the county" and refers to "all males over the age of fifteen on whom a sheriff
could call for assistance in preventing any type of civil disorder" (Legal Dictionary). It doesn't quite
meet the criteria for a secret society, but appears to be more along the lines of a rather well–known
and powerful gang, if you will. And way back when (the 1800s to be exact) sheriffs and marshals in
southern states needed all the help they could muster up. Law enforcement agencies were once a
shadow of what they are now. Back in ye ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The President and Congress have always and will always butt heads, it's a simple fact of life, but
after the 1876 Presidential election, Congress grew increasingly bitter. Troops had been placed in
polling places all throughout the South with the intention of stopping any and all ex–Confederate
officers from attempting to vote, it seemed reasonable enough at the time considering it was against
the law for former Confederate officers to vote. Congress, having been made up of mostly
Democrats, was becoming rather frustrated once they realized just who was going to win the
Presidential election. What resulted from the supposed intimidation tactics used by the Army at the
polling places was the election of Rutherford B. Hayes into Presidential office. Congress's
nightmare certainly came true. As per what usually occurs when you mix a Democratic Congress
with a Republican President (or vice versa), butting heads occurred more often than not. Congress's
response to the seemingly highly influenced election of 1876 was the enactment of the Posse
Comitatus Act, in order to outlaw the practice of posse comitatus. The suggested purpose behind the
enactment of the Posse Comitatus Act is that Congress wanted to stop the Army from being called to
perform miniscule, civilian, law enforcement duties. However, since that initial suggestion, it has
been found that

It Is Time to Replace the Electoral College Essay
It Is Time to Replace the Electoral College In 1787, the framers of the constitution assembled and
decided how the new nation would elect its president. It took the framers little less than a month to
accomplish this task. During that month they considered various methods ranging from direct
election of the president, to selection by legislators, to selection by electors. Finally, they settled on
selection by electors, most commonly known as Electoral College. There were various reasons why
Electoral College ultimately won out. We will explore some of the reason later in this essay. I
believe that the reasons which were legitimate at the time are no longer valid and the time has come
for us to replace the Electoral College with a system ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before we talk about replacing the Electoral College, we must understand how it works. The
Electoral College consists of total 538 electoral votes. Of the 538, 425 votes go to the House of
Representatives, 100 votes to the Senate, and 3 go to District of Columbia, granted to them by the
Twenty–third Amendment to the constitution. In the Electoral College system, each state is given a
set number of electoral votes. The number of electoral votes a state receives is determined by the
state population from the latest census records. On Election Day we are voting directly for the
electors, not the presidential candidates. So who are these elector that choose our president and how
are they selected? An elector can be any person except for a "Senator or Representative or any
person holding federal office" (Edwards III 3). Each state has its own method of selecting an elector.
The most common procedure–used in thirty–four states–is for state conventions of the parties to
nominate the electors. In ten other states and the District of Columbia, the statue party's central
committee makes the nominations. One state, Arizona, authorizes nomination of the electors in
primary elections. The remaining five states use a combination of methods. The most unusual
nomination law is Pennsylvania's, which authorizes each party's presidential nominee to select
electors on his behalf. (Edwards III 2–3)
The framers' idea of an elector was someone who would be

The Electoral College System Is Outdated And Unfair
Every year on the fourth of November an election is taken place to select the next president of the
United States. Just recently, in the 2016 election, Hilary Clinton won the popular vote and Donald
Trump won the electoral vote, in which he was elected president. This made many Americans
question if the electoral college system is outdated and unfair and if the direct popular vote is a more
effective way of electing the president. This has happened twice where the candidate who has the
popular vote did not win the presidency. The problem that has arisen is that the rules of the
presidential election need to be replaced so that it will reflect the true opinion of the U.S. citizens.
According to Edwards III, under the constitution, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Every state has two senators and the number of representatives that is proportional to its population
(Schumaker 12). Congress decides who they want to dictate how many electors each state has based
it off of the state 's population (Edwards 14). The Constitution requires that winning candidate must
have 270 of the Electoral College votes. For instance, during the 2004 election, Bush had collected
271 electoral votes if he had two fewer votes and Gore two more than both of the candidates would
have had fifty percent of the Electoral College votes (Schumaker 12).
What is a popular vote? A popular vote is a way for a candidate to get a majority of votes for an
election. The citizens of the U.S. vote on a presidential candidate.
How was the Electoral College Founded? The Electoral College was constructed to be a
compromise between the different ways of selecting the president. Originally the delegates of the
Constitutional Convention wanted Congress to select eh president, while others preferred the direct
popular election (Schumaker 13). While the Constitutional Convention proceeded, one of the
founders established a "Committee of the Eleven" to create a compromise for selecting the president
(Schumaker 13). The reason for the idea of the Electoral College many opposed to the direct popular
vote because people feared that the less popular vote would feel inferior to other states (Schumaker
13). This method was widely accepted there was

Presidential Campaign Of President Obama
Political campaigns can elevate a candidate's position, or a poorly run campaign can doom that
candidate's chances no matter how good the candidate is. At the end of the day all that matters is
winning. That is the goal of political campaigns in a nutshell. There have been many tactics
implemented when trying to run a campaign. Of the tactics implemented there are those that are
believed to work better than others. Of those that work better than others are, mobilizing base voters
by properly identifying who they are, having a clear message and spreading that message to voters,
debate performances and fundraising efforts. In this paper the 2008 presidential campaign of current
president Barack Obama will be measured along with the 2004 presidential campaign of John F.
Kerry. In this paper both campaigns will be analyzed on what tactics they used properly, where they
were not as effective and what could have been differently.
One of the most important factors when trying to run a successful political campaign is properly
identifying and mobilizing base voters. According to the readings in the book Presidential Elections:
Strategies and Structures of American Politics, it gives reasons why people do and do not vote. One
of the reasons people do vote is because voting in some way or another makes the voter "feel good."
However when a campaign properly identifies their base voters, they can pretty much assume that
those voters are going to go out and vote, but more importantly

The 21st Century Elections
The 21st Century Elections United States of America has been the country that was always seen as a
powerful and strong by other countries. Our nation that was perceived before as a symbol of
modernity and as a sign of example to follow was soon to change throughout the years and
demonstrated on the elections of 2000 and 2004 where our nation set in stone the failure to maintain
a quality on its political life as well as its elections. The political effect of the 2000 and 2004
elections had on the 2008 Election was very significant, there was an increase with the young voters
comparing to the two elections before, Obama was able to connect with a younger group of people
utilizing the network, there was a diversity of cultures that was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Oregon also had delays in counting votes because it used only a mail–in ballot causing also the
elections returns to be delayed (U.S. Constitution Online, 2013, para. 8). Ira Krakow (2006) asserted
that due to Gore's request to recounts the votes manually, there were four counties in Florida such as
Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami–Dade that recounted the votes which were also not
completed within the seven days deadline after the election. Volusia County finished but not the
other three counties and Florida's Secretary of State Republican Katherine Harris then requested
them to give proof of reasons they have not finished recounting the votes to what she also rejected
and decided to certify the ballots on November 18th, however, the Gore legal team sued Harris to
prevent the action, and the Florida Supreme Court agreed and ordered Harris to accept the results of
any manual recount that was completed by November 26th (Krakow, 2006). The Supreme Court
took the case, stopped the recount of the votes, and made the decision only with the votes that were
recounted awarding the election to Bush on December 11. On December 12th they had a certified
list of electors which was needed for the meeting of the Electoral College on December 18th so the
Congress would not have to certify the Florida electors (Krakow, 2006). In conclusion, the election
of 2000 was indeed a major phenomenon, even when Gore

Persuasive Essay On Donald Trumps
There are any reasons why hillary clinton should have won. Im am going to state only a few reasons
why donald trump should have lost. Hillary even won the popular vote and still lost the election to a
rapist a sexist and a racist. And the many other horrible things that donald trump is. Donald trump
violates a lot of the constitution not letting people have the same rights. Deporting people who are
citizens just because they look wrong to him. He's a jerk and bully he doesn't care what other people
want just what he wants. When he says he will "make america great again" no it should be he will
"make america bad again". All he ever does is criticize people around him. He doesn't care what
they think all he cares about is himself. He goin got cause a war with someone (most likely iraq).
He's a horrible person and i don't know how he is president. Another reason that donald trump
should have won is the fact the hillary won the popular vote is crazy. That has only happened 5
times in the entire history of the constitution. Everyone agrees that he is a gigantic asshole.
Thousands of people protest trump being president to this very day because they think he is a threat
to this country. Many of the facts that donald trump states are "complete nonsense" or "utter lunacy"
is said by many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people say that they believe in trumps ideas, but they're going to start doubting him when
we're screwed into a nuclear war. Im my opinion hillary should have won because the fact we have
the electoral college is the only reason he won. Also he supports only 2 of the 27 amendments and
disregards all the other ones. He wants to deport people out of the united states just because of their
religion and race or color. donald trump only cares about himself and he want people who don't look
like him out. He a gigantic jerk, bully and asshole in

Function Of Humorists In 'Status Anxiety' By Latins Anony
A few people may have the audacity to say that the United States presidential election of 2016 was a
buffoonery. From email scandals to the usage of vulgar language, it can be said for certain that the
nation was divided up between two political extremes. However, despite the controversy within the
nation, we saw the rise of a band of citizens speak freely about their beliefs, humorists. In Alain de
Botton's 2004 book, "Status Anxiety," he challenges the notion about the function of humorists in
society. Substantially, he claims that humorists do not simply entertain others, but in addition, "to
convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly." The author
believes this due to the fact humorists are granted ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rarely heard of, one unique, humorous speech named the "La La Awards" by Latins Anonymous
tackles a genuine issue in the world. It is a satirical monologue about an emcee rejecting their
heritage, in this case a Latino heritage, by impersonating white prominent figures in culture at an
awards show. At the end of the monologue, the emcee professes their genuine identity, a proud
bilingual individual with a Latino background. Aside its humorous content, it teaches society a
valuable lesson. It encourages culture to embrace their shared humanity, one of countless struggles
humans fear to do. How do we know if this would actually occur? We are compelled by those who
we look up to or make a sacrifice for the greater good. Consequently, humorists do not merely
entertain, but educate society in a humanistic perspective. While some may argue that humorists
may serve a pointless purpose in the community, it is apparent they play a factor in the world.
Humorists consist of cartoonists, stand–up comics, satirical writers, and hosts of television
programs, all of which are actual jobs. Stating they just make people laugh discourages their self–
esteem, ultimately affecting society because they are influentially deprived. Thereby, humorists
should not be viewed as incompetent because they speak openly for a multitude of people, and
impact them in solicitous

The Impact of a Third Party America´s Two Party Political...
The Impact of a Third Party America´s Two Party Political System
For hundreds of years, the two party system has dominated the American culture, but many people
are confused by what a two party system actually means. Although a two party system is defined as
two parties that are bigger than the rest, third parties have greatly impacted elections for over a
hundred years. Minor parties still continuously voice their opinions in issues, causing other
candidates of either major party to adopt their philosophies. Furthermore, some parties, such as the
Reform have actually been successful in obtaining a position, such as governor. Finally, third party
candidates have actually taken away votes from a number of nominees over the years. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
All of these positions influence the people to consider the presidential minor parties, thus having an
impact on the presidential elections. When a party wins a local office as a minor party, the name of
whatever the minor party is spreads around all the way around the United States. Not only does
winning a local office help the victor, but it also helps the member of the same party who runs for
President. The most recent example of a third party winning an office is the Independent Senator,
Jim Jeffords of Vermont. Jeffords, who was once a Republican, became an Independent because he
felt he no longer supported the policies of George W. Bush's Republican Party. With Jeffords'
transformation to the Independent Party, he has promoted the Independent Party over the last three
years and continues to be a prominent figure in the modern Independent world. In terms of
governor, Jesse Ventura was elected as the Reform Party's Governor of Minnesota where he
advocated and endorsed the typical Reform beliefs. Ventura shocked the world with the exception of
other minor party candidates, who believed any party could win with a strong campaign. Ventura has
been credited with being one of the first few people to employ the Internet in a political campaign.
The Green party in 2002 saw its greatest year of elections in its history with 71 new offices
obtained. The Green Party then had a total of 170 officeholders around the United States, showing

Third Parties History
Though the 2016 election has come and gone, I'm sure that during it you thought: Hillary Clinton or
Donald Trump? Don't like either? Well, were you aware of the other choices? You could choose a
third party candidate. A third party is a political party that is separate from the two major political
parties. Multiple third party candidates ran in the 2016 Presidential Election. Did you know that any
of them existed? Third parties have been a part of American Elections from the beginning, but have
had little success due to the advantages given to major party candidates. In order to further
understand third parties, we will look at the history of third parties in the United States.
Political parties have always been a part of American elections, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Republican Party brought attention to slavery, the Socialists to women's suffrage, the Populist
Party to child labor laws, and Ross Perot to the deficit. They have also helped laws such as the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938 come into place. But sadly, major parties steal their thunder. "In most
cases, the issues or ideas championed by third parties have been "stolen" by candidates of one of the
two major parties." (Mott) Third Parties often bring attention to issues normally ignored by the
Major Parties. Major party candidates will then "steal" these issues, that may be the platform of the
third party, causing their supporters to move to the Major Party. This can cause third parties to
disappear. Other obstacles include, becoming a possible candidate and receiving government
funding for campaigns. When Ralph Nader ran in 2004 he was expected to get the signatures of 1.5
million people in every state in order to appear on the ballot. Government funding for campaign are
based on the percentage of votes received last election, some third parties did not run in previous
elections do to lack of support or did not exist at the time. "Perhaps the most significant of the
obstacles facing third party candidates is the winner take all system." (Nwazota) In elections the
candidate with the highest percentage of votes in each state receives the electoral votes. This means
that a candidate could have widespread appeal but never receive electoral votes (This is what
happened to Ross Perot). From lack of support to unfair policies it may seem impossible for a third
party candidate to win, surprisingly, there is a

Exemplification Essay: The Rise And Fall Of The Electoral...
When America itself was just beginning, our Founding Fathers needed to come up with a system of
government that was both efficient and fair. Many ideas were brought up and rejected through the
process of getting to where we are now. One of the many difficult decisions they had to make was
deciding on a method to elect our leaders. Eventually, they came up with a process where a group of
538 people would cast votes for the running candidates, called the Electoral College. Whether this is
a good system or not, though, is up for debate. Since 1787 to this day, the Electoral College is the
process we've used to elect our Presidents and Vice–Presidents. On every election day when U.S.
citizens cast their votes for a candidate, they're actually voting for which candidate will get all of the
Electoral Votes from their state. In all states besides Maine and Nebraska, the candidate who earns
the popular vote will get all of the electoral votes that state has to offer, just like 'winner takes all.'
These votes aren't distributed equally regarding population or the size of the state though, which
makes it possible for the running candidates to only pay attention to to the states with the most
electoral votes, and still end up winning. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From a 2012 Forbes article, "Three candidates who received votes in the 2004 Electoral College are
George W. Bush (286), John Kerry (251) and John Ewards (1). No, you did not read a typo. Not
only did a Minnesota elector vote for Democratic Vice Presidential nominee John Edwards for both
President and Vice President, but he or she could not spell his ordinary last name correctly." Not
only is this ridiculous, but this is only one of the fifty–plus errors that have been made so far using
this

The Principles Of The Us Electoral System
In this paper, we will consider the principles of the US electoral system. We will discuss the
historical aspect of the presidential elections and respond to the following questions: Is the election
of the President of the United States a result of a direct democracy or a representative democracy?
Who was eligible to vote for the president in the 1790's? We will also find out the purpose of the
Electoral College and discuss principles of its work.
The electoral system of the United States is based on the principle of equality of all residents of the
states and a rigid filter of the candidates (instead of the usual majority principle). In 1787, at the
Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia "fathers of the nation" were considering various options
of the American electoral system.
The first option is the election of the President by the Congress members. It was rejected because
this method would cause a serious disagreement between the members of the Congress and reduce
its efficiency; also it could generate intrigue and corruption in the Congress.
The second option is the election of the President by the legislatures of the states. It was rejected
because of the possible weakening of central bodies of the USA executive power.
The third option is direct election of the president of the United States by citizens. It was rejected,
because in such a case, the populous states would determine the outcome of elections, and the role
of the rest would be kept to a minimum.
As a

Government and Politics
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must
arm themselves with the power knowledge gives. A popular government without popular
information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps both."
–– James Madison ("Focus" 1)
The United States has strived to be a true democracy, a place in which the citizens are free to govern
themselves, since its inception. For a democracy to work, the citizens must remain knowledgeable
and elections must remain unbiased. Our current system of electing presidents fails in both of these
regards: citizens are only given two choices that stand any chance of winning and their decisions
between those two candidates are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1996, an estimated $400 million was spent on television airtime alone by presidential candidates
and that number is predicted to rise 150% to $600 million in the 2004 elections (Associated Press 1).
The majority of this money is spent by the two largest political parties. Candidates backed by
smaller parties and independent candidates cannot afford the huge cost of television advertising. By
banning television and radio advertising, as they have done in France, we would allow candidates
who cannot afford commercials would to legitimately compete in the elections (Basham 1).
In addition to making elections too expensive for smaller candidates, the use of thirty second
television commercials as campaign tools has shifted the focus of campaigns from positive plans for
the future to simply offering negative claims about the other candidates. False claims run rampant in
commercials because their is no mediator overlooking them. The networks will air virtually
anything as long as the airtime is paid for. Although there are legal steps that opposing parties can
take to stop false advertising, it takes days or weeks to get a commercial taken of the air. During that
time, millions of people will have seen it and most will have accepted it as truth. The best defense
against false allegations in commercials has become creating more commercials to counter–attack.
Of course, all this takes money that candidates do not have unless they are backed by huge political

Essay about John Edwards' Biography
John Edwards' Biography
Many Americans recognize John Edwards as the second coming of Jimmy Carter; the soft–spoken
Democratic Senator from the south. They know him as the running mate of John Kerry in his 2004
Presidential campaign. But before the North Carolina Senator entertained aspirations of President or
Vice–President of the United States, John Edwards made a name for himself as a successful trial
lawyer, a strong husband and father, and charismatic politician.
Born in Seneca, South Carolina on June 10th 1953, Johnny Reid Edwards was raised a Methodist
and learned the values of hard work and perseverance from his father, Wallace and mother, Bobbie,
while growing up in Robbins, North Carolina. Working alongside his father in ... Show more content
In Congress, Senator Edwards quickly emerged as a champion for the issues that make a difference
to American families: quality health care, better schools, protecting civil liberties, preserving the
environment, saving Social Security and Medicare, and reforming the ways campaigns are financed.
As a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator Edwards worked tirelessly for a
strong national defense, and strengthening the security of our homeland. He authored key pieces of
legislation on Internet and port security, as well as biological terrorism. During the latter part of
2001 and throughout 2002, Edwards engaged in serious politicking, and on January 2, 2003, he
announced the formation of a presidential exploratory committee, declaring himself a champion for
regular folks. On September 16th 2003, in front of the old Milliken Mill (his father's workplace of
thirty–six years) in Robbins, North Carolina, Sen. Edwards formally announced his candidacy for
President during the 2004 elections. Although there was no rule or law against his inhabitance of a
Senate seat while running for President, John Edwards announced that he would not seek re–
election, so that he could focus all of his efforts toward his Presidential campaign.
Some viewed Edwards as a very viable candidate, given his success as a Senator in North Carolina.
He also had a

Rhetorical Analysis Of Barrack Obama's Met Barack Obama
July 27, 2004, was the night America met Barack Obama. This was the night that Obama, a member
of the Illinois Senate at the time, spoke as the keynote speaker at the Democratic National
Convention. Obama is widely known for his and grand speeches that bring tears of hope and joy to
many Americans eyes. To be able to produce such strong emotions, a speaker must put forth a
speech that has all aspects of The Rhetoric, Ethos, pathos, logos, and the five canons, as a well as
use another theory called Narrative Paradigm to register with the audience. Barrack Obama's 2004
DNC speech become widely successful as it created hope and national unity throughout Americas
with the help of Obama's use of The Rhetoric and Narrative Paradigm Theory. The Rhetoric is a
theory created by Aristotle; can be defined by Aristotle himself as "an ability, in each particular case,
to see the available means of persuasion". This theory holds three proofs to its name, ethos, pathos,
and logos. The key to a successful speech is holding all three of these proofs in the work. Ethos is
the character and credibility that the speaker holds. Pathos is what kind of emotional connection the
speaker makes with the audience. And Logos is how clear and rational the speaker's argument is
(Wenzel, 2017). Obama has all three proofs represented in his speech. Obama's Ethos or his
credibility comes from the fact that he was chosen as the keynote speaker at the DNC. While at the
time he was a not widely known politician, the fact that he was picked by presidential nominee,
John Kerry. The way Obama carries himself with pride and confidence; leading the audience to
believe that he truly is just that. If Obama made this same exact speech on the street people would
not give him one minuet of their time but because the DNC is a huge event held for the presidential
elections, that automatically gives him creditability. Obama uses pathos by telling the story of his
parents growing up. He tells the audience about how his father grew up in rural Kenya, herding
goats, and eventually worked his way to a scholarship "in a magical place: America" (Obama,
2004). He goes on to tell the story of his mother and how she grew up in America with a military
father and a

David Reimann Research Paper
Rev. David Reimann was 51 years old when he passed away on January 15, 2008. He was a faithful
pastor at St. John Lutheran Church in Dublin, Ohio for 17 years. He was born on August 1, 1957 in
Michigan. He grew up there and moved to Dublin in 1990. He graduated from Ludington High
School, Michigan, and got his Bachelor's degree from Concordia University, Ann Arbor. He then
went to The University of Michigan School of Music to receive his master's degree and then went to
Concordia Seminary in St. Louis. He was married for 28 years to his loving wife Mary Jo and had
four children; Kim, Tara, Tim, and Malia. Pastor Dave, or PD, as I knew him, was a loving, funny,
honest man. He always put everyone before himself. Every time I needed a little pick me up, he
always knew how to make me laugh and put a smile on my face. SHOW HOW HE DID THIS There
were many activities he loved including the outdoors and softball. Every Sunday, during the spring
and summer, he would be out on the ball field after church ready to win another softball game. He
loved to be out there with many other men from the church including his own son. He loved being
outdoors no matter if it was blazing hot or freezing cold. I remember going to his house in the
middle of winter when it was snowing and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When our church installed its new pipe organ, he was the first person to play it and when he played,
it sounded like angels coming down from heaven. He loved playing the organ, singing in the choir,
playing handbells and playing the piano anytime he got the chance. I remember every Christmas
Eve, before the service started, he would be upstairs in the sanctuary playing the organ, making the
most beautiful sounds that filled the church with joy. His love of music passed down to his son who
is now a music minister in St. Louis. He always fulfilled his love for music in all he did in

Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
Every four years, in the United States, a president is either elected or re–elected. The process, called
the Electoral College, is unique to America and is widely debated. According to Amendment XII of
the United States Constitution, state electors, which combined are the Electoral College, vote on
who should be president and vice president. If a candidate receives a majority of the vote, they will
hold that office. The number of electors a specific state receives is the sum of the number of senators
and the number of representatives a state is given. Typically, electors of a state will vote for whoever
won the popular vote in their state (Presidential Election Laws). Despite the typical winner–take–all
format for state electors, there is an effort to have states' electors vote based on the national popular
vote. This endeavor, officially called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, would go into
effect when enough states have joined that would have a total sum of electors greater than the
required majority (Zimmerman). Because the Electoral College provides a clearer winner and
ensures that the president is elected by the whole country, it should remain the way that the president
of the United States is elected.
A popular vote system would make it incredibly difficult to get a clear and definite winner of the
election, a problem that the Electoral College does not have. It is a lot easier for candidates to earn a
majority of electoral votes as opposed to

The President Of The United States Essay
Introduction
In November of every four years, the United States must select its president. In the United States,
the president is not only the head of state and head of government, but is also the commander–in–
chief of the largest and most powerful military in the world. From the 300 million residents of the
United States, only two people ultimately have a realistic chance of become the next president of the
United States. These two people, and the eventual president, are chosen through an odd process
semblant of a democracy which lasts many months and costs millions of dollars. This process
includes causes and primaries, culminating in a small body of individuals (called the electoral
college), voting on the next president based on a winner–takes–all popular votes result from their
respective states.
In the resent presidential election, which pitted the Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton against
real estate mogul Donald Trump, the candidates collectively raised over two billion dollars in an
election that defied conventions, and brought into question well–established facets of the election
process including the role of media coverage and the electoral college. To be more specific, the
media was scrutinized and reprimanded for giving Donald Trump an excessive amount coverage in
the early stages of the race, thereby reducing his need for expensive television commercials to
garner attention. On the other hand, the electoral college system allowed the now

Essay About Electoral College
The electoral college is a relic from days gone by, and like those days, it's time for it to retire. The
college, in all it's promotes the blatant distrust of the will of the majority, has a sub–par backup plan
in the event of an electoral tie, and violates political equality.
The Electoral College's plan in the event of an electoral tie is an inherently flawed one, and instead
of simpler alternatives such as simply using the direct vote, it goes to the House of Representatives.
The problem with this plan of action is the very fact that it goes to the House of Representatives, and
that each state casts exactly one ballot. In his article, "The Indefensible Electoral College", Bradford
Plumer shows that in the event of a tie "The single representative from Wyoming, representing
500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35
million voters". This is an enormous structural flaw in the Electoral College ... Show more content
The final fundamental problem with the Electoral College is its' violations of political equality. In
his article "Why the Electoral College Is Bad For America" for the Yale University Press (YUP),
George C. Edwards goes on to illustrate how fundamentally non–neutral a counting device the
electoral college is. For example, if one were to win 12 states, and the District of Columbia, with the
fewest electoral votes, you would be handed 44 votes. On the other hand, if you were to win the
state of Illinois, a state endowed with 20 electoral votes, and a population as of 2004 of 12,830,632,
you would still not have as much as you would've if you had won those twelve state. The major
problem in this system is that combined those areas have 329,910 less people then Illinois,
illustrating that in the convoluted and complex system that is the college, size of population is by no
means a guarantee of a state's significance in the Electoral

FAMU Connection Concert Report
This past Wednesday night, I watched a high energy performance by FAMU Connection. This
performance took me on a flight that I hoped would never end. This journey demonstrated Goethe's
three elements portraying a storyline dealing with a group of college students. FAMU Connection
was about a group of friends, from different places on a plane heading to Tallahassee, Florida, to
attend college. However, one of their friends was not quite sure if FAMU was the right choice.
During the flight, the flight attendants were stating the facts about Florida Agricultural One of
Goethe's questions he would ask was what the artist was trying to do. I believe the actors were
trying to persuade the audience to attend Florida Agricultural and Mechanical

Essay on Electoral College
According to critics, the Electoral College is a faulty system that should be abolished and replaced
by direct election. Supporters of the Electoral College system make convincing arguments that it is
the best system to decide the Presidential election in a complex society such as the United States.
Many scholars place the Electoral College into a historical context by discussing its evolution and
sustenance throughout the history of the United States. This paper will discuss the main arguments
made by supporters of the Electoral College System. I will first provide a description of the
Electoral College and offer justifications as to why it was conceived by the Founding Fathers. Next,
I will present major arguments from the critics of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, a compromise was made by the delegates to have electors chosen by the various state
legislatures elect the President. This is the decision that made The Constitution. Critics of the
Electoral College often make three main arguments. The first argument states that the Electoral
College does not accurately represent the will of the people. The Electoral College's failure to
capture the will of the people derives from the winner take all system where the Presidential
candidates compete to win the most popular votes and whoever wins in that state, wins all the
electoral votes of that state. With this, it becomes difficult if not impossible for third party or
independent parties to make a showing in the Electoral College. Subsequently, the argument states
that the Electoral College supports a two party system and discourages third party and independent
candidates, which in turn restricts the choices available to the electorate. The second argument is the
possible role of the Electoral College in depressing the voter turnout. "Since each State is entitled to
the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the States
to encourage voter participation" and, finally the third argument is based on the alleged unfairness in
the process by which the votes are distributed among the

The Importance Of The Electoral College
The United States is considered the leader in promoting democratic values worldwide. For this very
reason, the United States has engaged in conflicts and negotiations around the world to allow the
people of different countries the ability to freely and directly elect their leaders. However, the
United States remains the only democratic country in the world that does not allow the people to
directly elect their President. Instead, the United States opts for the undemocratic institution of the
Electoral College, in which electors from each state are chosen and these electors are the actual
people that cast the votes that decide the presidential election. The Founders set up a system in
Article II Section I of the Constitution that guarantees, "each state shall appoint... a Number of
Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be
entitled in the Congress," and that, "the Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be
President, if such Number be a Majority of the Number of Electors appointed" (Constitution). This
outdated system of electing the "leader of the free world" should be abolished in favor of a direct
popular vote in which the winner must receive at least 40% of the vote. If 40% is not reached, a
runoff election between the top two vote–getters will be held a month after the November election to
determine who becomes the President. The system of a popular vote would make sure all voices are
heard and that the people

Madam President?
Madam President? President of the United States, the highest office in our nation. A respected title, a
praiseworthy title, an honorable title, but some may ask why anyone would want to be President.
For the fame, the power, or maybe they actually care about our country? But if we're talking about
Hillary Clinton, we will never know. This is Mrs. Clintons second time running for President of the
United States, but nobody knows why she's running... According to Investor's Business Daily,
Hillary Clinton has never explained why she wants to be our President, which is a little weird if you
ask me. And isn't our President supposed to be trustworthy, dependable, and fair at all times? Mrs.
Clinton is absolutely NONE of those. Hillary Clinton ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Clinton attended an online women's interview, where she was asked several political questions that
she did not answer, however she seemed to like talking about milk and her hairstyle more than the
problems our country is facing. Additionally, Clinton has been called a clumsy campaigner because
her staff gave the audience favorable questions in her last Presidential run, as a result, some voters
believe this could happen again. (Malcolm, Andrew).
Personally, I don't think Hillary Clinton actually knows what she wants. She continues to change her
views on major issues, and seems to only agree with whichever opinion is most popular with the
public at the time.
Do you recall when Hillary was against gay marriage? In 2004, Hillary Clinton gave a speech
broadcasted by C–Span and stated this:
"I believe marriage is not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman [...] the
fundamental bedrock principle that [marriage] exists between a man and a woman."
Then, in 2013, during an interview with Terry Gross, she states: "For me, marriage had always been
a matter left to the States," she said, eventually going on, "[I] fully endorse the efforts by activists to
work state by state."
It seems puzzling that just three years ago, she would not publicly say she supported gay marriage,
but since she started her campaign for president. All of a sudden, she acts like she has supported
them all

An Analysis of Three Presidential Elections
In this paper, three years of presidential elections shall be analyzed, mainly keeping an eye on the
turnout of voter, and the causes and effects of such turnouts. It shall be observed that voting turnouts
are directly related to the attitude candidate have and the ways in which they make fellow citizens
eager about their potential presidency, and the policies they plan on bringing to the country that are
related to the general public.
The first year of Presidential elections to be analyzed is that of 1988. Records show that in 1988, in
which Dukakis and Bush were battling for the title of President, the turnout was even lower than the
average expectation and only 91,594,686 people showed up to cast their vote. This figure concludes
that 50.1 percent of people eligible to vote came to elect the president of their choice and the rest did
not show interest. (Wright, 1995)
As mentioned the 1988 election was not very successful in attaining the president of the choice of
most American people because a very low number of people showed up to cast their vote. The low
turnout can be explained through several reasons.
First of all, it must be realized that Dukakis was a democratic candidate. It is well known that
democrats usually attract the low socioeconomic population who are more likely to skip voting for
reasons that are not political. However, those with higher socioeconomic statuses, who are less
likely to skip elections, are generally in favor of Republican leaders.

Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
There are some that would argue that the Electoral College should not be abolished. Williams
argued, "According to 2013 census data, nine states–California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, and Michigan–have populations that total roughly 160 million,
slightly more than half the U.S. population. It is conceivable that just nine states could determine the
presidency in a popular vote" (Williams). Consequently, without the Electoral College, nine states
can possibly determine the results of an election. Those that support the Electoral College think that
elections should be by state instead of a vote per person. The Electoral College can keep unqualified
candidates from winning an election and therefore, become president. "Talents for low intrigue, and
the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State;
but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and
confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make
him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States. It will not
be too strong to say, that there will be a constant probability of seeing the station filled by characters
pre–eminent for ability and virtue" (Williams). He supports the idea that the Electoral College keeps
unqualified candidates from becoming the president. He also talks about how there is a

Fahrenheit 9/11 Essay
Fahrenheit 9/11
Michael Moore's latest film, "Fahrenheit 9/11," presents a critical look at the administration of
George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. In this film Moore investigates the rapid growth of the
United States government and its trend of trampling the rights of individuals, and the corporatism
that is spawned out of the close ties between big government and big business during wartime.
Michael Moore may not convince all audiences, but is successful for its factual accuracy in which
the evidence spoke for itself, and at the same time proclaimed Moore's artistry in transposing and
splicing scenes to create impressions that supported his allegations and opinions. Michael Moore has
employed two main techniques in an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The scene of Lipscomb breaking into tears provides an empathetic reaction from the audience
further strengthening Moore's persuasion techniques.
Moore uses emotion to move the audience and this was intensely effective when the screen goes
entirely black and the audience is left the soundtrack of the tragic events of September 11 plays and
imposes an insistent presence of cries, sirens and radio communications. This is followed by the
image of New Yorkers terrified by the inexpressible horror of the collapse of the towers. Moore
keeps only the faces, contorted with tension and fear. The terrible reverse shot of this scene,
certainly known and engraved in all memories. The director does not believe in the simple force of
the image. The audience is already conquered upstream. This emblematic sequence gives the general
tone of the documentary.
In addition to using pathos to get the audience' attention Moore also makes extensive use of
rhetorical questions during "Fahrenheit 9/11,"to create a negative representation of George W Bush.
For example, during the classroom scene on September 11th, while Bush sits quietly, contemplating
the attacks, Moore poses whether Bush should "have held at least one meeting since taking office to
discuss the threat of terrorist" (Moore, Fahrenheit 9/11). Immediately this implies that Bush hasn't
had a meeting on terrorism since taking office in 2001, providing the audience with a disapproving
outlook on Bush's image.
Repetition is

The Electoral College Is Outdated And Undemocratic
The Electoral College is Outdated and Undemocratic
Many people hail the Electoral College as democratic, but the 2016 Presidential Election was
anything except democratic. The highly scrutinized leader, Donald J. Trump, won a majority of the
Electoral College, sealing his place as the Forty–Fifth President of the United States, but did not
receive the majority vote, as the popular vote went to Hillary Clinton. The results of previous
elections have not reflected the people's opinions, and it disenfranchised numerous Americans.
Outlined in the United States Constitution, the Electoral College reflects the needs of an eighteenth
century society (Amar, 2016). Because the Electoral College does not meet a twenty–first century
society's needs, it should be replaced by a national popular vote where voter registration is based on
a test regarding United States government basic knowledge. The Electoral College was created in
the late eighteenth century with its complex process outlined in the United States Constitution; more
specifically, the Twelfth Amendment. 538 electors comprise the system, and to win the presidency, a
candidate must obtain 270 votes. In the event no candidate receives the required votes, the election
redirects to the House of Representatives where they vote on the three candidates who received the
largest sum of votes (Parker, 2016). Consequently, the popular vote does not influence the election's
outcome; previous presidents have not won the popular vote.

What Makes A Great President
What makes a person a great president? This is a question that could have many different answers
depending on which political party one belongs to. Recently, the election of our new president has
caused protests and rioting in our country. Many people say he does not know anything about
politics and are unsure of whether or not he will make a great president for our country. We will take
a look at one of the former presidents of the United States to see what people thought about how he
did as our leader. First, we will be taking a look at his early life as a child and his life before
presidency. Next, we will be discussing his political philosophy and beliefs, and his legacy as our
leader. Finally, we will look at what his life was like after he had served as president and also how
America thought he did overall as president. During his early life, George W. Bush ... Show more
Bush began his life after presidency at the age of sixty–two. He returned to Midland, Texas and took
up residence very promptly at his Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford upon leaving office. He
eventually became part of the Dallas Community. He gave speeches and became very involved with
the George W. Bush Institute which he established at SMU. Bush enjoyed biking, golfing, attending
Texas Rangers baseball games, and reading American history in his free–time. Bush also began
doing paintings of his pets and many of the world leaders from his presidency, which attracted
national attention. His paintings were later displayed in his own presidential library. (4–5) Overall,
President George W. Bush was a memorable leader of the United States. He helped our nation
recover from the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He worked quietly to establish his legacy. He supported
veterans suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. Bush is known not only for his presidency,
but also for his paintings and the presidential center at SMU. Overall, Bush was a good and very
memorable

Rhetorical Analysis of Speech a Speech by George W. Bush...
In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure,
audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona.
More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how
they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of
the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and
why it is apparent in this particular speech.
President Bush's speech was directed towards an audience of northern Arizonan republican
supporters. Bush continuously uses the rhetorical appeal of pathos, the appeal to the ... Show more
It is another great example the rhetorical appeal of pathos. Again in an emotional appeal to the
nation Bush tries to sum up the general feelings of his audience when he refers to the people who
lost their lives on Flight 93 while working to save others. Bush recalls the events by exclaiming, "It
was a sad, sad moment...". The use of the word "sad" was a simple but effective way to convey
emotion to the audience and rally it to support the speaker.
Bush uses the first few paragraphs of his speech to introduce several of the people he is working
with. The appeals he makes in these lines are excellent examples of ethos, the rhetorical appeal to
character. Bush continuously comments on the character of the people around him. He speaks of
them as if he knows them very well, almost like old friends. Through this appeal the audience
became able to relate to these people and learn a little bit about their character. Some of the people
mentioned have large families and are of an honest and selfless nature. Because the speaker's
purpose is to gain support from the constituents for the candidates represented, the appeal to the
character of the candidates is a crucial tool that becomes extremely vital to the swaying of the
audience to the purposes of the speaker.
In the case of this speech, the appeals to

Political Office Campaign Marketing
With the ongoing growth in social media usage and other technological advances, the needs for
marketing and financial strategies in business endeavors are more important than ever before. These
endeavors also carry over to political office campaigns. While the purposes of financing and
marketing have greatly changed over time, their importance is at an all time high for these
campaigns. In order to run a successful political office campaign, one must also have a successful
marketing and financing campaign as well.
A campaign plan takes account of a campaign's goals, message, target audience, and financial
expenses. Candidates must also successfully communicate the message of the campaign, recruit
volunteers, and raise money. Marketing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, the political teams for Donald Trump and Marco Rubio repeatedly bashed the early
frontrunner in the 2016 Republican primary, Jeb Bush with negative ad campaigns. Each campaign
called out Bush's Super PAC and its lack of efficiency. The negative advertising proved effective, as
Bush eventually dropped out of the Republican primary. This same strategy seemed to doom Rubio
as well, as negative ads from Trump and other candidates doomed the Florida senator – Rubio could
not even win his home state of Florida. Additionally, Trump has also been an extreme target for
negative advertising from the other republican candidates, as this arguably is the only thing that has
stopped him from clinching the Republican nomination so far and increased the likelihood for a
contested convention this upcoming summer. This just goes to show that heavy financing will not
win you an election by itself. On the other hand, Clinton remains the favorite to win the democratic
nomination and the presidency, and has raised a significantly larger amount that any other candidate,
as shown in the figures

Analysis: Why Bill Clinton Won The 2004 Election
President Bill Clinton served two terms as President, therefore, he was not able to run for the
president again. Therefore, the democratic nominee was President Clinton's Vice President, Al Gore
and Republican George W. Bush up against each other for the 2000 election. George W. Bush won
the 2000 election to become the next President of the United States. However, some analysts believe
he won due to the substantial negative campaigning. So, why did he then win the 2004 election?
During President Bush's first term in the office, the horrific terrorism attack on September 11th
occurred, therefore, his campaign tactic for the 2004 election focused on national security, and
presenting himself as a significant leader while displaying John Kerry as a "flip–flopper" (Lenz,
2013). George W. Bush advertisement – https://youtu.be/7zktv920BJM
On the other hand, John Kerry used negative campaigning tactics while portraying himself as a
"new direction", promising to make ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the 2008 election, George Bush had completed his second term in office, leaving two fresh
faces to run for President of the United States. Barrack Obama, an Illinois Senator, was running for
the Democrats and Republican John McCain, an Arizona Senator. During Obama's first term
election, the Democratic party used the ongoing conflicts in Iraq as their central issue of the
campaign. The slogan of "candidate for change" was used by Barrack Obama since the Republicans
had held the presidential seat for the past 8 years. Now in Obama's reelection year, Mitt Romney's
campaign tactics consisted of using Obama's own statements against him. This commercial really
struck a nerve with many Americans when they saw it
http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/2012/these–hands. Again negative tactics against
the opposing candidate take precedence over what they can do for our

POlitical Campaign Advertising Essays
Since 1952, television has played a major role in presidential elections. Television allows candidates
to reach a broad number of people, and personalities, to help push along their campaigns.
Campaigns help the candidates just as much as the voters. The candidates get to be identified, and
known to the voters, and the voters get to hear and see how a specific candidate identifies with their
needs and wants. The best way to get this information out there is through the most used form of
media, television.
When candidates develop a plan of attack for campaign advertising, they tend to aim for at least four
types of commercials. One form or type of commercial is those which play on the fears of
countrymen. Fear ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the 2004 election, President Bush's campaign ads showed him to be a leader and a strong
president in a time when leadership was needed. Kerry's ad showed him to be a people person, and a
person who connects with the citizen of this country.
Political parties also use ads that make there opponent out to be the bad guy, and often these ads
come from what their opponent has said in the past. Candidates use information from the past to
display the image that there opponent can not be trusted and will go back on his or her word. This is
typically called "flip flopping". When candidates make there opponent out to be a flip flopper, the
opponent is making things worst for themselves. The Republican Party ran a series of ads that made
Senator Kerry look like a flip flopper, and I think the overall effective ness of those ads was a major
factor in the election, but Senator Kerry also stated his claims and told the voter how he fells on the
very same issues that the republican party made senator Kerry to look indecisive on.
Campaigns that are introducing a candidate to mainstream national coverage tend to run ads that
will show a candidates history and their background. These ads might list what some might call the
qualification needed to be in office. These ads usually show a record of good decision making,
leadership, honesty,

Essay The Debate Over Same Sex Marriage

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kristi Anderson

More from Kristi Anderson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay The Debate Over Same Sex Marriage