(2014) Water without Borders: The Columbia River Treaty Renegotiation and Transboundary Water Governance (10.5 MB)
1. Water without Borders:
The Columbia River Treaty Renegotiation and
Transboundary Water Governance
Border Policy Research Institute
Western Washington University
January 23, 2013
Dr. Emma S. Norman
Assistant Professor of Geography
Department of Social Sciences
Environmental and Energy Policy Program
2. Questions…
• What does the CRT tell us about
changing governance patterns?
• Are borders ‘softening’ or
‘thickening’
• Lessons learned?
• Why does it matter?
3.
4. CRT 101
• 1961 / Ratified in 1964
• Constructed 4 dams
• Flood Control
• Cost Sharing
• Shared Energy /
Benefits
• Mechanisms for
Cooperation
• Possible Termination:
• 2024 / 2014 (Sept. 16)
• Treaty ‘Modernization’
8. Many Entry Points
• Act 1: People and Place: Knowing the River
• Act 2: Harnessing Energy
• Act 3: Treaty Making / ‘Sharing’ Power
• Act 4: Rethinking Power
10. Knowledge of,
connection to Place
Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce Tribe
Marmes Rock Shelter (1967)
Human inhabitants dating back 11,230 year
11. c. 1900
Sceneries of
Columbia River,
Drying salmon,
Celilo Falls,
Oregon". No.
10541, B.W.
Kilburn
Company.
James Davis
photo
The Great Provider
12. Knowing / Naming the ‘Big River’:
Wimahl, Nch’i-Wàna, swah'netk'qhu, Columbia
Map of Lew and Clark, Across the Western Portion of N.
America, published 1814
Robert Gray, Named the Columbia river, in 1792
13. Social Power / Power of Maps
David Thompson:
map-maker, trader, explorer
“. . .in their power”
• upstream / downstream
protocol. . .
• know your neighbors. . .
14. Dipnet fishing at the Cul-De-Sac of Celilo Falls (Columbia River) circa 1957, Oregon,
15. Harnessing the Columbia River
Creating the Discourse
,
folk singer Woody Guthrie
“Roll on Columbia. . . . “
Commissioned by Bonneville
Power Authority
18. Treaty Now and Then
What the Treaty Does
• Coordinates Flood Control
• Generates Energy
• Generates Revenues
• Cost-Sharing
• Federal Controlled / Acted
Grievances
• Loss of Ecosystems (Salmon
Habitat)
• Inequitable Cost-Share
• Lack of Indigenous Rights
• Lack of Community
Participation & Decision Making
and Participation
20. Changing
Governance Mechanisms
1st meeting of the International Joint Commission, 1912
International Watersheds Boards, 2012
Round Table Discussion on Water Security, 2011
21. Different Eras
• Cooperative
Development
• Comprehensive
Management
• Sustainable
Development
• Participatory
– Projects of mutual benefit
– 1944 – 1964
– i.e. Columbia River dam
- Linking environment and economy
- 1986 – 2000 / current
- Increased local participation
• 2000 - current
• i.e. Watershed Boards
-Issue – based
-1965 – 1985
i.e. Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement/Annex
23. Renegotiation Process
Inclusion of Indigenous Groups
Inclusion of Citizen Groups
Greater Consideration for Ecosystems
Provisions for adaptation to Climate Change
? ? Maintains Similar Flood Control Provisions
24. Modernized Treaty
Regional Recommendations (BC) Post 2024
• Better address the region’s need for a reliable and economically sustainable
hydropower system;
• Continue to provide a similar level of flood risk management to protect public safety
and the region’s economy;
• include ecosystem-based function as a third primary purpose of the Treaty, to
ensure a more comprehensive approach throughout the Columbia Basin watershed;
and
• create the flexibility within the Treaty that is necessary to respond to climate change,
changing water supply needs, and other future potential changes in system operations
while continuing to meet authorized purposes such as navigation.
25. Modernized Treaty
Regional Recommendations (US) Post 2024
• Greatest Possible Shared Benefits - Continued Cooperation of Operations of Treaty
Reservoirs;
• Health of ecosystem should be a shared benefit and shared cost of the U.S. and
Canada;
• All operations based on ‘best available science’ and ‘measurable outcomes’.
• create the flexibility within the Treaty that is necessary to respond to climate change,
changing water supply needs, and other future potential changes in system operations
while continuing to meet authorized purposes such as navigation.
26. Modernized Treaty Categories
• Hydropower
• Flood Risk Management
• Ecosystem Based Function
• Water Supply
• Navigation Recreation
• Climate Change
27. Ecosystem Based Function
• 2. “A modernized Treaty should recognize and
minimize adverse effects to tribal, First
Nations, and other cultural resource in
Canada and the United States. To the extent
there are adverse effects……Federal Columbia
River Power Systems Cultural Resources
Program.
33. What CRT tells us about
governance patterns
• Greater need for…
• Inclusion of Indigenous treaty rights, land
claims, and self–governance
• Consideration of environmental provisions
• Aligning governance mechanisms with
increased public expectations for public
involvement and regional representation.
35. Lessons Learned…
• Know your neighbor
• Keep communicating (in times of non-crisis)
• Think Systemically / Holistically
• Power (like water) comes in many forms
• Learn from the Past
• Be prepared for the future
Think like a river….
37. More Questions &
New Projects
What is the the ‘right’ scale for
water governance?
Negotiating Water Governance:
Why the Politics of Scale Matter (Ashgate, 2014)
How can shared governance
lead to self-determination and
decolonization?
Governing Transboundary Waters: Canada, the
United States and Indigenous Communities
(Routledge, 2014)
Polly Spenner, 2012, Collage #5
Essentially, we propose a demographic study of the stakeholders in the GL fishery take, with attention to how changing demographics affect stakeholder involvement in fishery management.
The treaty allows for cross border management of water in the Columbia River that flows 2,000 kilometres through B.C., Washington and Oregon.
Four dams were constructed under this treaty: three in Canada (Duncan Dam, Mica Dam, Keenleyside Dam) and one in the United States (Libby Dam). The treaty provided for the sharing with Canada of one-half of the downstream U.S. power and flood benefits, and allows the operation of Treaty storage for other benefits
Four dams were constructed under this treaty: three in Canada (Duncan Dam, Mica Dam, Keenleyside Dam) and one in the United States (Libby Dam). The treaty provided for the sharing with Canada of one-half of the downstream U.S. power and flood benefits, and allows the operation of Treaty storage for other benefits
Chevvy Impalla - gas mileage: xxx
My Fair Lady – Julie Andrews
I want to hold your hand by the Beatles
Nelson Mandela sentenced to life imprisonment in South Africa (June 11).
Congress approves Gulf of Tonkin Resolution after North Vietnamese torpedo boats allegedly attack US destroyers (Aug. 7). Background: Vietnam War
Khrushchev is deposed; Kosygin becomes premier and Brezhnev becomes first secretary of the Communist Party (October). Background: Rulers of Russia since 1533
World Statistics - Population: 3.276 billion population by decade
Nobel Peace Prize - Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (US)
53 city / 46 highway
Person of the Year
Top Selling Car – Prius
American Hustle
1Daft Punk feat. Pharrell and Nile Rodgers, "Get Lucky”
Obamacare
Boston Marrathon
Royal Baby Birth
Paula Dean Lawsuit
Death of Nelson Mandela
7.2 Billion People on Earth
Many different Native Americans and First Nations peoples have a historical and continuing presence on the Columbia. South of the Canada–U.S. border, the Colville, Spokane, Coeur d'Alene, Yakama, Nez Perce, Cayuse, Palus, Umatilla, Cowlitz, and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs live along the U.S. stretch. Along the upper Snake River and Salmon River, the Shoshone Bannock tribes are present. The Sinixt or Lakes people lived on the lower stretch of the Canadian portion,[43] while above that the Shuswap people (Secwepemc in their own language) reckon the whole of the upper Columbia east to the Rockies as part of their territory.[44] The Canadian portion of the Columbia Basin outline the Traditional homelands of the Canadian Kootenay- Ktunaxa.
The Chinook tribe, which is not federally recognized, who live near the lower Columbia River, call it Wimahl in the Chinookan language.[45] and Nch’i-Wàna to the Sahaptin-speaking peoples of its middle course in present-day Washington;[46] The river is known as swah'netk'qhu by the Sinixt people, who live in the area of the Arrow Lakes in the river's upper reaches in Canada.[47] All three terms essentially mean "the big river".
Celilo Falls: the great provider
Wimahl in the Chinookan language.
Over his career he mapped over 3.9 million square kilometers of North America and for this has been described as the "greatest land geographer who ever lived.
Married a Scottish / Cree woman – married 58 years – longest marriage known in Canada at the time. 13 children.
Map from Lake Superior to Columbia
Map of 1812
Dip net fishing at the Cul-De-Sac of Celilo Falls (Columbia River) circa 1957, Oregon, USA. United States Army Corps of Engineers.
The song glamorized the harnessing of the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest. The 11 hydroelectric dams built on the American stretch of the Columbia helped farms and industry, but their construction also permanently altered the character of the river.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20ZffI6by3A
New Deal
Fraser River could not have become Fraser River without Columbia
Fish versus Power is very good history, but it contains a chastening conclusion. British Columbians spared Fraser salmon not because they had great empathy for nature, but because their electrical demands increased only after technological innovations enabled them to exploit the already-devastated Columbia and soon-to-be devastated Peace. This is not the sort of tale that makes readers proud - the just-so stories are much more effective on that score
Dams on the Columbia have transformed the river into a series of slackwater pools, such as this one between Bonneville and The Dalles, as seen from Rowena Crest.
Cooperative Development (1945 – 1955)
Projects of mutual benefit
i.e. Columbia River dam
Comprehensive Management (1965 – 1985)
Issue - based
i.e. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement/Annex
Sustainable Development (1985 – current)
Projects linking environment and economy
Participatory (2000 – current)
Increased Participation at local level
i.e. Watershed Boards, IJC
What is the the ‘right’ scale for water governance?