Paranormal Research Paper

Paranormal Research Paper
When it comes to paranormal occurrences, drastic measures are taken to prove that it is not
paranormal, but coincidence. There is always an explanation for what goes 'bump' in the night, even
if it is unseen. Certain circumstances are understandable to think there is something lurking in the
dark, but the phenomena is likely caused from fear. It is programmed in people's minds to fear the
unknown and fear the dark. Many people believe in ghosts or entities, but have no proof of ever
encountering one, which then becomes hear say. When the paranormal subject is brought up in
discussion, most people who are skeptical of the possibility, practice many different procedures to
prove the paranormal is all in the mind of those consumed by fear. To ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The witnesses would then present an abundance of photo–video evidence to be reviewed by
scientific specialists. It has been known for many people to edit or alter these "findings" to try to
make their stories believable. With todays technology, many specialists have been trained to find
any altercations to the evidence being presented. Photoshop is one of the most common culprits to
photo–video editing, proving nearly all evidence fraudulent. If the photo–video has not been edited,
it has been said that there is a technology malfunction in the equipment or bad lighting in the area. If
noises are recorded and are unexplained, the specialists send a team to where the occurrence took
place, to record evidence for themselves or to scope the area. There has always been an explanation
for strange noises. Radiators, old creaking floors, and even wind blowing through the attics are the
main sources of the strange noises being
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Ms. Gonzales 's Injuries Under The Dram Shop Act
It is likely that Ms. Gonzales will be found liable for Mr. Sutton's injuries under the Dram Shop Act
as the evidence shows both that Mr. Sutton had been "obviously intoxicated", in a readily apparent
manner, when he was served alcohol at Ms. Gonzales's art show, and also because Mr. Sutton's
intoxicated state had been the proximate cause of his injuries. Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 2.02
(LexisNexis, Lexis Advance through the 2015 regular session, 84th Legislature). There are two
elements, within the Texas Dram Shop Act, that must be met in order for a provider to be liable for a
patron's injuries. The first element that must be met is that the patron had been served alcohol, even
though "at the time the provision occurred it was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
El Chico Corp., 732 S.W.2d 306. For instance, in Bruce, the court held that the inebriated state of a
pair of customers of the defendant's restaurant may be deemed to have been sufficiently apparent to
the restaurant based on circumstantial evidence alone even if the defendant had not possessed actual
knowledge of the pair's condition. Bruce v. K.K.B., Inc., 52 S.W.3d 250 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi
2001). The plaintiffs in Bruce suffered serious injuries after his car was struck by an intoxicated
driver (a member of the aforementioned pair), who die died in the crash, who was driving home
from the defendant's restaurant. Id. In spite of testimony to the contrary by both the restaurant's
employees and the surviving member of the pair, the court held that there was sufficient
circumstantial evidence to exhibit that the driver had been "obviously intoxicated to the extent that
she presented a clear danger to herself and other" at the time of service. Id. Analogously, in Perseus,
the inebriated nature of a patron of the defendant's bar was deemed to have been sufficiently
apparent to the defendant, even if the defendant lacked actual knowledge of the patron's condition,
since the defendant should have had knowledge of the customer's condition. Perseus, Inc. 995
S.W.2d 202. The defendants in Perseus. were sued after the aforementioned patron hit and killed two
people after leaving

Crime And Punishment Psychology
In the novel Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, the murder of Alyona Ivanovna leaves
many characters scratching their heads. While authorities come up with several suspects, they are
unable to connect the suspects to the crime without reasonable uncertainty. When discussing the
murder, Razumikhin says "In this one case alone, one might open up a whole new approach. From
the psychological information alone it would be possible to show how to get on to the right track.
"We've got the facts," they say. But facts aren't everything; at least half the battle consists in how
one makes use of them" (164). For Razumikhin, the "whole new approach" is using the psychology
of the murderer to understand the facts and recreate the narrative. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While this makes sense because they did not commit the crime, what does not make sense was one
of the workmen running away and trying to hang himself when he was not guilty. Why would he run
and hang himself had he not committed the crime? Similarly, why does Raskolnikov faint when he
hears the police discussing the murder at the police station, and why does Raskolnikov become so
agitated and argumentative when he hears the murder discussed? But Razumikhin dismisses the
fainting of Raskolnikov because Raskolnikov had a fever and the police station smelled of oil paint.
While Razumikhin is correct that how you use the facts is just as important as what the facts are,
given the facts that the police and the public have, there is just as much evidence for one suspect as
the next. Razumikhin himself admits "Evidence of this kind –one founded purely on a simple
psychological impossibility, on a simple state of mind– as being irrefutable and having the effect of
demolishing all the incriminating and circumstantial evidence, whatever it may be. No, it is not"
(171) Each element of the story and each psychological insight is just as tainted and twisted as the
next. Ultimately the known facts, evidence, and psychological motives leave the police and people
of St. Petersburg with more questions than answers. While Razumikhin believes it is about how you
use the facts, one must be careful not to lead themselves

Evidence And Circumstantial Evidence
The collection of evidence, whether it be direct, circumstantial, physical, or testimonial, is very
important to a case. Why? Because that evidence is what the prosecution hopes will end with a
conviction. However, sometimes things happen and evidence gets contaminated. Now, the biggest
thing to determine is whether the contamination happened on accident or if someone tampered with
it on purpose.
There are four different types of evidence, direct, circumstantial, physical, and testimonial. Direct
evidence is evidence that is in the form of a testimony that someone has seen, heard, or physically
touched (Direct evidence, 2008). So that, if believed, proves a fact without inference or
presumptions (Direct evidence, 2008). This is different from circumstantial in the fact that direct
evidence erases the questioning and thinking behind the evidence itself (Direct evidence, 2008). ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is a series of facts that require reasoning and experience (Circumstantial evidence, 2008). The
members of the court who are presenting circumstantial evidence to the jury argues that the series of
facts that they are presenting resemble the facts proven so closely that they are just inferred to be
truth and that is what the jury must decide (Circumstantial evidence, 2008). For example, if James
sees William shoot Emily that's direct evidence, but if James see William and Emily go into another
room together and hears William say that he was going to shoot Emily, and then hears a gun shot
and William comes out the room holding a gun and Emily is dead, James' testimony would be
circumstantial

Examples Of Ten Minute Essay
Ten Minute Essay
If I have to provide only a yes or no answer, I would have to say no. The scenario is too vague to
confirm a, "yes" answer. Or preferably I would like to conclude that possibly the magazine would be
relevant. Here is my reasoning; the scenario states that there is a magazine that was found in the
backseat of the car driven by Danielle. Thus, if I was the investigator on scene and in doing a
thorough job of investigating the accident scene, I would look over everything top to bottom inside
and out of the car. At first I would note it and then secure the magazine as evidence possibly taking
precautions to look and see what was in the bag in the first place. Upon finding out it is a magazine
in the backseat, then we can ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The questions I would already have coming to my mind is what type of magazine needs to be
wrapped in another brown paper? Was this magazine hiding something else? Drugs in the pages?
Was it hiding material or contents in the magazine of an illegal nature? Then if this is true, and the
location of the magazine is the backseat of the car, and should it be directly connected to Danielle
and not her father, then we have a possibility of an additional crime, that Danielle would or could be
charged over and above anything to do with the car accident.
After ascertaining the reason and type of magazine in the brown paper, are answered, then the next
questions to the puzzle would be in regards to any elements found in and around the car that could
be the cause of the accident either directly or indirectly. Anoher question needing an answer is
would that particular magazine affect the outcome of any lawsuit filed or charges brought against
the driver that was a factor in this accident. Also, should it be determined that this item would affect
the outcome of the lawsuit then it is relevant and should be taken and entered into evidence.
However, if it wasn't related to causing this accident and the item was still containing illegal
material or hiding contraband then according to FRE 403 the magazine could be relevant to an
entirely different crime. Therefore, Danielle or her father could be held or charged with a crime if he
or she was concealing anything

Circumstantial Evidence Analysis
Evidence is every considerable type of proof legally presented at a trial it also must be approved by
a judge. The reason why we use evidence is to help convince the judge or jury of supposed facts that
relate to the case. Witnesses who testify, an expert who has information on certain fields of work,
paperwork, records, photos etc. are all types of evidence that could be used in a case. Circumstantial
evidence is evidence that aims to come to a conclusion by stating the cause while logically trying to
prove the facts. The arguments and statements lawyers present to the judge and a judge who wants
to make a statement can be ruled with an objection therefore it is not consider evidence. During a
testimony a witness must swear under oath to say nothing but the truth that way her testimony can
be considered the truth since they no way of know if it is the truth or not. If they are caught in a lie
consequences will be brought down on the witness and in some cases it can completely throw–out
the case. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It has to have the potential to hold in court and must be relevant to the case, can not be immaterial,
or must be able to pass all standards which means no objections if not it is consider inadmissible
evidence which is not relevant to the case. On certain occasions a person may try to present certain
evidence that has nothing to do with the case or determining a fact. For example, gory details to
prove support a point or fact may possibly be irrelevant, so it may outweigh its value. Criminal
cases that the courts handle are usually much more strict on letting the jury hear such inappropriate
details because of the possibility in "undue prejudice." The court only wants the jury to hear the
passive aggressive version of facts in cases especially those that involved

The Burden Of Proof Is The Duty Of A Party
Introduction
The burden of proof is the duty of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will shift the
conclusion away from the default position, to that party 's own position. In a legal dispute, one party
is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the
burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets their burden, the burden of proof
switches to the other side. Burdens may be of different kinds for each party, in different phases of
litigation. (Wikipedia, 2017) For all cases, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove beyond
reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty and vice versa for the defense. To start, the prosecution
gave their argument: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The applicable code of the prosecution was to prove beyond reasonable doubt rather than just
speculation on the case and learning about what the actual presented evidence consists of.
The reason the O.J. Simpson's case is pivotal in the crimes in the United States of America is the
necessity of the prosecution to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt; the standard that no other
logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime,
thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty (Beyond a
Reasonable Doubt, 2008). Despite being a first–degree murder case and a prima facie case, OJ
Simpson's was acquitted. The case came with a high public awareness concerning the prevalence of
domestic violence and difference. Also in the case of Casey; there was an expectation of conviction
due to the first evidence was given by the prosecution.
Opening Statements
The defense attorney was more convincing as compared to the prosecution. The attorney directs the
jury to seek what transpired and not to base their position on investigation directed to one person
only. He points out that the defense had a desperate investigation full of speculation and guessing. It
came down to a belief the state did not prove its case because it could not prove how Caylee died.
Human decomposition made it impossible to prove the mode of Caylee 's death with

Essay on Unauthorized Absence
This article is designed to cover every case not elsewhere provided for in which any member of the
armed forces is through the member's own fault not at the place where the member is required to be
at a prescribed time. It is not necessary that the person be absent entirely from military jurisdiction
and control. The first part of this article–relating to the appointed place of duty–applies whether the
place is appointed as a rendezvous for several or for one only.
The offenses of failure to go to and going from appointed place of duty require proof that the
accused actually knew of the appointed time and place of duty. The offense of absence from unit,
organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid maneuvers or field exercises ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
(e) Unauthorized absence with the intent to avoid maneuvers or field exercises (special type of duty
and specific intent). A member of the armed forces turned over to the civilian authorities upon
request is not absent without leave while held by them under that delivery. When a member of the
armed forces, being absent with leave, or absent without leave, is held, tried, and acquitted by
civilian authorities, the member's status as absent with leave, or absent without leave, is not thereby
changed, regardless how long held. The fact that a member of the armed forces is convicted by the
civilian authorities, or adjudicated to be a juvenile offender, or the case is "diverted" out of the
regular criminal process for a probationary period does not excuse any unauthorized absence,
because the member's inability to return was the result of willful misconduct. If a member is
released by the civilian authorities with–out trial, and was on authorized leave at the time of arrest or
detention, the member may be found guilty of unauthorized absence only if it is proved that the
member actually committed the offense for which detained, thus establishing that the absence was
the result of the member's own misconduct.
A person undergoing transfer between activities is ordinarily considered to be attached to the
activity to which ordered to report. A person on temporary

An Agreement Between Two Or More Persons Case Study
1. An Agreement Between Two or More Persons
In your first question you ask what steps must a person take to enter into a conspiracy. The relevant
case law establishes that a "confederacy of two or more persons" is a necessary condition of a civil
conspiracy. Van Royen, 262 Md. at 97–98. Moreover, the agreement must be shown by a
preponderance of the evidence. Out of recognition of the difficulties inherent in obtaining evidence
of agreed–to illicit conduct, however, the agreement can be shown either largely or completely
though circumstantial evidence indicating that the conspirators were engaged in a common plan.
Indeed:
In a civil case not involving a criminal act, conspiracy may be shown by a preponderance of the
evidence and may be proved by circumstantial evidence since almost never is direct evidence
available. Conspiracy may be shown by inferences drawn from the nature of the acts complained of,
the individual and collective interests of the alleged conspirators, the situation and relation of the
parties, their motives and all the surrounding circumstances preceding and attending the culmination
of the common design.
Daugherty v. Kessler, 264 Md. 281, 292 (1972) (citing W. Md. Dairy v. Chenoweth, 180 Md. 236,
243 (1942)).
"In essence the rule is that the plaintiff may prevail if men of sound mind may reasoningly and
reasonably deduce from the facts and circumstances presented to them that there was a conspiracy."
Id. Accordingly, the cases have established

Direct Vs Circumstantial Evidence Essay
Direct vs. Circumstantial Evidence
Evidence comes in many forms, such as eyewitnesses, participants, prior statements by the
defendant, documents, physical evidence, and scientific evidence, like fingerprints or DNA. No
matter the form, there are two basic kinds of evidence that may be admitted in court, direct evidence
and circumstantial evidence.
Direct evidence refers to any piece of evidence that stands alone to prove an assertion. In other
words, it provides direct proof of a fact and doesn't require any type of inference. The testimony of
an eyewitness is the most common form of direct evidence likely to be presented at a criminal trial.
When a witness relates something that he/she directly observed or experienced, he is offering direct
evidence of an event. For example, "a witness who testifies that he saw the defendant shoot the
victim gives direct evidence. A witness who testifies that he saw the defendant fleeing the scene of
the crime, or a forensics expert who says that ballistics proves that the defendant's gun shot the
bullet that killed the victim both give circumstantial ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unlike direct evidence, circumstantial evidence doesn't "stand alone", it requires the use of logical
reasoning to prove a fact. Forensic evidence is a good example of circumstantial evidence. It
requires the use of deductive reasoning to connect a suspect to a crime, because the evidence on its
own doesn't prove anything. Instructor Earl Crowe uses the example of the O.J. Simpson trial and
the gloves that were involved in that case. He states, "The gloves are considered circumstantial
evidence because no one witnessed the killings, and therefore there was no direct testimony that the
killer used the gloves that were entered in as evidence." Unlike direct, circumstantial is a little more
difficult to prove in court but is still just as

Stress Management Quiz
1) ____________ are internal states that focus on particular aspects of or objects in the environment.
2) Inventory shrinkages and accidents pertain to which component of direct costs associated with
mismanaged organizational stress?
3) Which of the following is an example of an indirect cost associated with mismanaged
organizational stress?
4) Distrust, disrespect, and animosity pertain to which component of indirect costs associated with
mismanaged organizational stress?
5) Title VII is most relevant to the employment context because it __________on the basis of race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin in all aspects of employment. A. prevents layoffs
B. eliminates nepotism
C. prohibits ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
12) When companies discover they can communicate better with their customers through employees
who are similar to their customers, those companies then realize they have increased their _____
diversity.
13) Which of the following observations is correct?
A. Diversity is quantitative and affirmative action is qualitative.
B. Diversity is proactive and affirmative action is reactive.
C. Diversity is problem focused and affirmative action is opportunity focused.
D. Diversity is government initiated and affirmative action is voluntary
14) How firms compete with each other and how they attain and sustain competitive advantage is
the essence of
A. operations management
B. financial management
C. data management
D. strategic management
15) Which of the following defines the crucial elements for a strategy's success? A. Strategy analysis
B. Strategy formulation
C. Strategy facilitation
D. Strategy implementation

16) How does a mission statement differ from a vision statement?
A. The mission statement includes the result of an analysis of the future availability of labor and
also future labor requirements.
B. The mission statement is an effort to anticipate future business and environmental demands on an
organization, and to provide qualified people to fulfill that business and satisfy those demands.
C. The mission statement typically includes a fairly substantial effort to establish some direct

Direct Circumstantial Evidence
There are several types of evidence that are direct, circumstantial or real. Evidence may be
presented in the form of witness testimony, written documents, videotapes, magnetic media,
photographs, and physical objects. Evidence such as tire marks, ransom notes and fingerprints are
all examples of the physical evidence.
All different types of physical evidence are interesting and play a vital role on a case to prove the
defendant's guilt. One of the different types of physical evidence I find the most interesting are the
foot and tires impression that could connect a perpetrator to a crime. The impressive part of the shoe
is that it could prove what size and type of shoes the perpetrator wore during the time of the crime.
The tire print also

Ignorance And Happiness In Fahrenheit 451 And Pleasantville
The world we have, where we live, comprises a vast amount of knowledge. Knowledge refers to
awareness or familiarity, obtained through learning, discoveries, or education. When you born, your
brain is a blank sheet of paper. As you develop, your mind becomes conscious of facts and fills the
clear piece of paper. The writing on the paper is precious; thus the knowledge is invaluable.
Everyone knows knowledge is precious, but have you ever thought: can knowledge make people
unhappy, distracted or suspicious? Ignorance is bliss' plays a crucial character, contemplating the
above question. Ignorance is happiness; a phrase that is strongly interpreted in the book Giver and
the supporting films: Fahrenheit 451 and Pleasantville.
'Ignorance is bliss' is well–explained in the book Giver due to the subsequent explanations. The
book Giver illustrates that everybody in the society is peaceful, except Jonas and the Giver. The
reason Jonas and Giver are depressed is that they are mindful of all the unpleasant memories that
have been given on for years. An additional example – that supports the phrase 'Unawareness is
pleasure,' – is, when Jonas's father goes for the releasing of a child, Jonas uncovers that releasing is
death. Before Jonas realized that releasing is death, he agreed on the concept of releasing, but as he
determines that releasing means death, that instant he says "he killed him, my father killed him,"
showing a shock, and sadness. The statement, 'Illiteracy is happiness' is correct because the
examples illustrate that everyone in the community is fortunate because they are innocent of
everything, even colors. They don't even know what is outside the town, so they claim it elsewhere.
If people wish to live a pleasant life, they should not be informed of everything
The movie Fahrenheit 451 provides a highly circumstantial evidence, for the phrase 'Ignorance is
bliss.' The famous quote from the film Fahrenheit 451; 'If you do not wish a house to set up, hide the
nails and woods,' meaning no one can build a house without nails and woods. How does this quote
justify Ignorance is bliss? The quote states that if societies do not require people to have the
intelligence, then all the wisdom–bearing materials

Summary: Thicke, T. I.
On August 15, 2013, Williams, Thicke, T.I. (Plaintiffs), filed a complaint for declaratory relief in
response to allegations made by both Marvin Gaye's family as well as those made by Bridgeport
Music, Inc. Compl. 1:2, August 13, 2013. In the complaint, Plaintiffs expressly denied these
allegations, stating that they neither incorporated, nor used any elements from "Got to Give It Up."
Compl. 5:2–4. Furthermore, they pointed out that "sounding like" another song does not meet the
prima facie case for copyright infringement. Compl. 2:9–10.
2b. Defendant's Response to Declaratory Relief Suit Between October and November, defendants
filed counterclaims stating that Plaintiffs, More Water from Nazareth Publishing, Inc. , and
Interscope ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
See Paul Goldstein, Goldstein on Copyright § 9.1.1 (3d ed. 2011). Direct evidence in this instance
typically means witness testimony, the infringer's own admission, or some recording showing the
infringer in the act of copying the author's work. Id. Circumstantial evidence is much easier to put
forth. In order to prove actual copying via circumstantial evidence, the author must prove (1) that
the infringer had access to the work and he must also prove (2) probative similarities. Id. Access can
be proven a number of ways, including evidence that the infringer had reasonable opportunity to
observe the plaintiff's work. Id. Courts have construed this to include a chain of events proving that
the infringer may have gained access to the work. Courts have also allowed access to be proven by
the simple fact that a work has been so widely disseminated that the infringer was able to access it
through the

Circumstantial Evidence
Physical Evidence is evidence that is seen at the crime scene. They are objects that may contain vital
information that are laying around the area of where the crime is committed. These objects are sent
to research facilities to see if the objects are useful in finding out what really happened during the
crime. If they are useless, then they will not change the thought of those who wish to know the truth.
But if they hold information that will turn the tide of a court case, then they will be used.
Circumstantial evidence is what most prosecutors use in the court of law. This evidence comes from
clues found at the scene that have something very defining about them. For example, no two people
have the same fingerprint. So if one is found at the crime scene, then it may lead to something
important. Or maybe not, since it may have been accidental, but you never know. Testimony is a
written sentence or statement that is used to prove a point. If someone is murdered and there is a
note next to the body. What the note says may give away who committed homicide or how the letter
is written, like how neat the words are, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When they talk about it, they do not mention how it may be false, until the end when they say,"And
defense attorneys frequently attack the validity of forensic evidence by pointing to lapses in the way
the evidence was collected or handled." Though, they do mentions that is has flaws. This means that
if the evidence does have some things that don't make sense, then it would be obvious that they were
messed with and then someone could be called out and it may head towards the truth being revealed.
And they mention this at the end of the text, which is suspicious since when someone sees the
bottom of the page, they feel relieved and think that they just want to get through the rest and may
not care as much. They may have done this so many people skip over it and think that forensic
evidence is more

Title VII Employment Discrimination Cases
Disparate treatment entails claims of deliberate and intended discrimination in which the employer
knowingly and intentionally discriminated against people on the basis of specific characteristics
such as race or sex. In contrast, disparate impact or also known as adverse impact focuses on the
effect of employment practices rather than on the reason or purpose underlying them (Heneman,
Judge, & Kammeyer–
Mueller, 2012). Theoretically, the main differentiation between disparate
treatment and disparate impact is the intent of your employer. Disparate impact involves a policy
which your employer may not have intended to be discriminatory, but which nonetheless affects one
entity more negatively than another. Disparate treatment, on the other ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If an employer treats some job applicants who are protected under the civil rights laws less
favorably than others because of their protected status, the applicant may have a Title VII claim. A
causal connection between the applicant's protected status and less favorable treatment may be
proven under a disparate treatment theory. Equally important, proof of discriminatory intent is
required in a disparate treatment case. The employer's motivation and intent can be proven through
circumstantial evidence that the job applicant was treated less favorably than similarly situated job
applicants outside of the protected class. Essentially, the burden of proof for a Title VII disparate
treatment case is based upon the burden–shifting test that the United States Supreme Court
articulated in McDonnell Douglas Gorp. v. Green. In this influential case, the Court established the
well organized framework to determine whether employment discrimination occurred due to
disparate treatment. To prove a prima facie case in an employment discrimination case based on
disparate treatment, a plaintiff must show that he/she is a member of a protected class who applied
for and was qualified for a position but was rejected based on his protected status. The

Witness for the Prosecution
The mystery, "Witness for the Prosecution", was produced in 1957 by Arthur Hornblow, Jr. and
directed by Billy Wilder. The two lead male actors were Tyrone Power as Leonard Vole and Charles
Laughton as Sir Wilfrid Robarts. The lead female actor was Marlene Dietrich as Christine Helm.
"Witness for the Prosecution" superbly demonstrated a realist view of the operating procedures in a
courtroom. The actors within the courtroom were easy to identify, and the steps transitioned
smoothly from the arrest to the reading of the verdict. The murder trial of Leonard Vole provided
realistic insight into how laws on the books are used in courtroom proceedings. With the inferior
elements noted, the superior element of the court system in "Witness ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The defense for Vole was nonexistent until a stranger provided damaging evidence against the
prosecution's most damaging witness.
For the defendant to be found guilty of murder, the burden is placed on the prosecutor "to prove the
defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014, p. 33). In other words, the
prosecutor, Mr. Myer must present a strong case to satisfy the jury "that charges against the
defendant are almost certainly true" (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014, p. 35). When the trial started, the
evidence was strong enough for a guilty verdict. The prosecution had three witnesses to support the
claim that Vole killed Emily French. The first witness, Inspector Hearne, provided the court with
blood evidence on the sleeve of Vole's jacket; however, during cross–examination, Sir Wilfrid
disputed the evidence because Vole's blood type was not excluded as the donor. The second witness
was Janet McKenize, Mrs. French's hard of hearing housekeeper, who stated she heard Vole and
Mrs. French talking on the night of the murder; nevertheless, during cross–examination, Sir Wilfrid
discredited her testimony when he proved to the jury that she was hard of hearing. The climax of the
prosecution came when Mr. Myers, after objections by Sir Wilfrid, called Christine Helm, Vole's
wife, to the stand. Christine was thought to be the wife of Vole but provided

Is Mayella Ewell Powerful Or Powerful Analysis
Is Mayella ewell powerful?That is the question that is asked and must be answered.Throughout the
story" To kill a mockingbird" Mayella shows some glimpses of power but not enough to say she is
powerful.For example in the beginning she shows that she can not even control her home life so
how can she be powerful.Also she shows that she is just too poor for her to have power.Now in the
next three paragraphs I will explain my thinking on why I believe Mayella is not powerful.
In the first paragraph I will explain why and how I believe Mayella Ewell is not powerful, with the
use of class.First off I would like to show you one of my biggest reasons for believing Mayella is
not powerful "Maycombs Ewells lived behind the town garbage dump in what used to be a negro
cabin".(DBQ:Is mayella Ewell powerful?13)The second reason I believe Mayella Ewell is not
powerful while using class for my examples is that "longs as he keeps on callin' me ma'am and sayin
miss Mayella.I don't hafta take his sass, I ain't called upon to take it" (DBQ: Is Mayella Ewell
powerful?.17). Now you can see even in her dialect she does not know or have class, you can also
tell by the way she is not used to being called ma'am and miss Mayella.Next I will show how much
of a lower class the Ewells are in "Mayella Ewell must have the loneliest person in the world...;
white people wouldn't have anything to do with her because she lived among pigs"(DBQ:Is mayella
Ewell powerful"21).The final reason I believe Mayella

Case: United States V. Ceballos
Rubio.
Likewise, mere possession of a vehicle cannot support an inference of knowledge regarding the
presence of contraband, and it certainly cannot support the specific intent as to a conspiracy or
otherwise for aiding and abetting. Indeed, "[i]t is axiomatic that more is required than mere
knowledge of the purpose of a conspiracy. See, e.g., Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703,
711–13 (1943); United States v. Ceballos, 340 F.3d 115, 124 (2d Cir. 2003). What is more, such
knowledge by itself, would not even establish aiding and abetting liability, which requires proof of
the intent to contribute to the success of the underlying crime, see United States v. Reifler, 446 F.3d
65, 96 (2d Cir. 2006), let alone conspiracy. See ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moreno, 579 F.2d 371, 372 (5th Cir. 1978), the compartment containing drugs had been welded onto
the truck's exterior and was partly visible to a person simply inspecting the back of the truck. The
defendant in United States v. Legeza, 559 F.2d 441, 442 (5th Cir.1977), was driving a car that
smelled of marijuana, testified that he knew pillow cases had been concealed and that they felt
peculiar, and acknowledged that the car's owner was using him in some kind of illicit scheme. The
odor of marijuana was about the vehicle in United States v. Maspero, 496 F.2d 1354, 1356–68 (5th
Cir. 1974), as well, and seeds were in plain view on the trailer's floor. Moreover, the defendants in
Maspero engaged in a variety of suspicious activities while under surveillance. Again, the odor of
marijuana was present about the automobile in United States v. Rodriguez, 556 F.2d 277, 278 (5th
Cir. 1977). The defendant in United States v. Fonseca, 490 F.2d 464, 466 (5th Cir 1974), had
previously been stopped in the same automobile, and marijuana seeds and rolling papers were
discovered in that earlier inspection. A strong odor of heroin was present in the car in United States
v. Gonzalez, 700 F.2d 196, 204 (5th Cir. 1976), and the defendant had been present during several
veiled discussions of the drug

Circumstantial Evidence In The Case Of Casey Anthony
The Casey Anthony trial outraged the media and public when Casey Anthony was found not guilty
on two counts of child neglect and murder. Casey Antony was put on trial on May 24th 2011 for the
death of her daughter Caylee Anthony. From the beginning of the case all the facts seem to point to
Casey Anthony, such as her lack of concern of her daughter's whereabouts. Cindy Anthony made a
call to law enforcement after picking up her car from a tow yard, which Cindy claimed reeked like
human remains. The same car that Casey Anthony had abandoned in a parking lot after Caylee had
been missing for about a month (Casey Anthony Biography, 2015). Caylee's mother who failed to
call police when her daughter went missing is a red flag.
There are various ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The defense claimed Caylee Anthony accidently drowned in her pool. Casey Anthony's remaining
actions proves that if this were the case, any concerned mother would have contacted law
enforcement immediately. In the event that Caylee Anthony drowned because of Casey Anthony's
neglect. Casey Anthony avoided calling police in fear of being prosecuted on child neglect, abuse
charges or manslaughter. Casey Anthony's failure to call law enforcement proves there is child
neglect. If a child is missing it is the caregiver's responsibility to find out where that child is. Now it
is hard to tell why any mother would fail to protect or have a desire to murder her own flesh in
blood. There are various psychologically and situational factors that play into these types of

The Consequences Of Frankenstein : Frankenstein Is The...
Does a definition of a monster have to be an unhuman like form or can it be a person who has done
numerous unjustified actions? An example would be if a person has committed many crimes or
harm innocent people, then should the person be counted as a monster. An image of a monster is a
form of some living thing that has ill qualities. Although the creature was thought as the monster,
but truly the creator of the creature is the true monster. Frankenstein is the monster because of social
isolation from his family, his act of selfishness, and his abandonment for what he created. The first
evidence that proves Frankenstein is the real monster is when Frankenstein was in a social isolation
when he was creating his experiment. One quality a monster has is social isolation and how it cannot
fit in with people. This quality fits perfectly with Frankenstein's actions because he was left behind
in society by not contacting any of his friends or his family during the time he was working on his
experiment. "And the same feelings which made me neglect the scenes around me caused me also to
forget those friends who were so many miles absent, and whom I had not seen for so long a time"
(Shelly Pg 83 Line 38). According to Dr. McAndrew When a person is alone in an unchanging
environment, the sensory information available to that person, and the ways in which it processes, it
can change in unpredictable ways (The Perils of Social Isolation). In analysis, Frankenstein was
isolated from

Circumstantial Evidence: Case Study
Based on the evidence given from both document briefs the appellant Kevin Latham should not be
given a re trail and that the trial Latham received was fair and justified. Firstly, the circumstantial
evidence such as Latham entering Mrs. Bernadette's home while she was away as mentioned in page
3 paragraphs 7 & 8, himself being in present near Bernadette's house when she, her son Lenaris, and
the place arrived at her house as mentioned in page 3 paragraph 5, as well as his ex girlfriend in
possession of many items stolen from Mrs. Bernadette's on page 3 paragraph 13 heavily implies he
committed theft. He denies that he is responsible and claims their isn't enough substantial evidence
to convict him. However his fingerprints are found near

12 Angry Men Movie Analysis
Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA 321
Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors
represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of
first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Uncomfortably hot
and sweaty, one intent on getting to a ball game, eleven of the twelve jurors had no intention to stop
and think about the life contingent on their verdict. The entire story was motivated by the reasonable
doubt, communication competence, and persuasion of one man. Had they not discussed the evidence
in further detail and investigated potential explanations, the boy would have been executed. The
purpose of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The diversity issues explored in the film are most discernable in Jurors #3, #5, and #10. Juror #3
constantly explodes with bottled–up anger, blinding him to the facts. Juror #5 shares his upbringing
in a slum, identifying with the boy's struggle growing up in an underprivileged area in an abusive
family. Juror # 10 is an unreasonable bigot whose prejudice ultimately demonstrates his lack of
credibility. Even Juror #4, who was one of the last to concede, told Juror #10, "now sit down and
don't open your mouth again" (Lumet, 1975). Eventually the biases among the group were
overcome, as they made no contribution to determining innocence or guilt. The jury did achieve
their goal to reach a unanimous decision, but it was not the original goal of each juror. There were
clearly mixed feelings regarding the conclusion of their deliberation, including self–awareness,
reflection, and relief. A swift and undiscussed decision concerning the fate of the boy's life was an
inappropriate approach for the jury. In the end, all of the jurors were satisfied with the verdict of not
guilty, but for very different reasons.
Reference:
Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 Angry Men [Motion

The Evidence For The Earliest Use Of Fire By Humans
Critically Examine the Evidence for the Earliest use of Fire by Humans
Fire, the source of heat and light, plays an important role throughout the history of humans, and has
been closely integrated into many stages of their evolution. The ability to control fire became a
turning point in human evolution, which enabled early hominids to cook food, according to Richard
Wrangham 's "Cooking Hypothesis", cooking food increased food efficiency so that human
ancestors spent less time foraging, chewing, and digesting Homo Erectus developed smaller, more
efficient digestive tract which freed up energy to enable larger brain growth. (Wrangham et al. 1999)
Therefore, the importance of fire is uncontested, and the question: "When was fire first controlled by
human beings?" becomes a hotly debated issue among archaeologists. With the excavations of more
ancient sites and improved methodology, some famous hypotheses and evidence for the earliest use
of fire by humans has been put forward. Here are some famous claims about evidence for earliest
controlled fire, and some analysis archaeologists made to prove those are hominin use of fire rather
than accidental fire. The first site was Swartkrans cave, South Africa, which suggests fire may
possibly have been in use there as early as about 1.0 –1.5 Million year ago. "As the excavation of
the Member 3 sediment progressed, numerous other pieces of fossil bone came to light that appeared
to have been burnt. Histological and chemical examination

Eyewitness Identification Evidence Essay
Witness identification evidence is the second most incriminating type of evidence bar a confession
(Brandon & Davies, 1973 – as cited by Valentine & Heaton, 1999). However, The Innocence Project
reports it is also the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the US, more specifically, 72% of
DNA exoneration cases since 1989.
The aim of line–ups is to give the witness a fair test of recognition. Additionally, the suspect (who
may be innocent) must also be given a fair chance. In the 1976 the Devlin Report was created
following an investigation into a signification number of wrongful convictions. The aim of the
report was to minimise convictions based on solely eye witness testimony. However, this rule is not
specified in law indicating that false identifications are still a likely possibility. The Police and
Criminal Evidence Act (1984) (UK code of practice) aims to increase the likelihood of accurate
identifications by providing guidelines to law enforcements. Although PACE provides guidelines for
how to conduct line–ups, the incidence of false identifications is still common.
It is of great importance to ensure that eyewitness identification of suspect's can be as accurate and
reliable as possible, especially considering the frequency and importance of its use. Factors that
affect the accuracy of eyewitness identification must be addressed and ameliorated to avoid future
miscarriages of justice (i.e. prosecuting the wrong person). Whilst law enforcements may not have

The Legal System Of The State Of Maryland
Kirk Noble Bloodsworth was wrongly convicted for the sexual assault, rape, and premeditated
murder of 9–year–old Dawn Venice Hamilton. Bloodsworth would spend nearly 9 years in
confinement for a crime that he did not commit. Despite his vehement pleas of innocence, the
circumstantial evidence was enough to convince a jury that he was the culprit. He was ultimately
sentenced to death for the heinous crimes committed to Hamilton. With receiving the death penalty,
his case would automatically be appealed. The legal system of the state of Maryland had ultimately
failed Kirk Bloodsworth. During the early morning of July 24, 1984 Dawn Hamilton had finished
watching a television sitcom. She lived with her family in the Fontana Wood Apartments, which was
adjacent to the Golden Ring Mall, and Becky Pond. She had gone out to play hide and go seek with
her cousin Lisa, in the nearby wooden area. When she couldn't locate Lisa she had approached two
boys and a man asking for help with her hide and go see game (2013). The boys and man were
discussing a turtle that they had caught at the nearby pond, so they were preoccupied with their
reptile. The two young boys had declined to help while the grown stranger had agreed to help. After
Lisa Returned home without Dawn, her mom had become alarmed. After a few hours had elapsed,
the police were alerted and a neighborhood wide search had begun. Purportedly, a newspaper
delivery man made the gruesome discovery of Dawn Hamilton in the wooded

Fire Debate
After everything I read, my decision never really changed from the beginning to the end of the story.
Even though there was plenty of evidence to prove me wrong, I have a gut feeling that Willingham
started the fire. It seems absurd that a man has the ability to start a fire and leave his 3 you children
inside. I wanna start by first saying I'm not a huge believer in the death penalty for this reason
specifically. For the death penalty to be put to use in my opinion requires indisputable evidence.
Either a video or audio recording of the criminal admitting to said crime or doing the crime. How
many people have already died because they were falsely accused of a crime? We have no idea. That
sickens me. While I don't believe the death penalty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This does not change my mind, however this needs to be addressed. False evidence can not be used
in court. This could incriminate a man who was not worthy of the crime. I'm not saying the
Willingham should still have served his punishment based on my evidence, but there should
definitely have been a re–trial with the information that is present now. I don't think Willingham
would have gone to jail with my evidence, seeing as it is circumstantial, but I do believe he is guilty.
In conclusion and to answer the basic questions, no an innocent man was not killed. Did he deserve
the punishment, however? No. This is not a case were there is indisputable evidence that
incriminates Willingham with the death of his

Circumstantial Evidence In John's The Man From Earth
People become skeptical about an unusual story even if there is a circumstantial evidence. People
add circumstantial evidence of the story when they try to share it with others making them believe it.
Sometimes speakers provide physical evidence in addition to circumstantial evidence, but the
audiences still tend to have doubts in their minds. It is very common to hear from audiences saying
that they think the story is true because of the provided evidence, but they still doubt it. In The Man
From Earth (2007), John describes what his early life was like and how he behaved according to
landscape and natural events such as the sun rising and sunset, but colleagues call it textbook
knowledge and disbelieve him. This does not likely happen if the subject of the story is something
that happens on a daily basis. Colleagues ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most people think that there is only one true world in which they live, and everyone lives their own
life in this world. This is not true, unfortunately. The world in which each person lives is the world
for himself or herself that is built up by his or her own sense and thoughts, which is slightly different
from the true world. The word that expresses this well is a phrase that the world exists only as much
as people know. It is not that people perceive the world because it exists, but the world exists
because people perceive. And people are very vulnerable hearing the truth that breaks this world of
their own. For instance, Children who believe in the existence of Santa Claus may react violently if
they hear that Santa Claus is not real. Edith, in The Man From Earth (2007), becomes outraged
when John says he was Jesus who tried to pass down Buddha's lesson to others. Colleagues go
through emotional up and downs constantly and even upset while they listen to John's story which
stands against their common sense and faithful

Essay about Domestic Violence In Police Homes
As all officers know, domestic violence is a serious problem throughout the United States.
Unfortunately, it is also a crime that some officers perpetrate in their own homes. When officers –
who are sworn to protect and serve in their communities – abuse their power and control at home,
they violate the law. When this occurs, the victim, the family, the agency, and the entire community
suffer. Officers are trained to maintain control, to use weapons, and to justify their use of force on
the job. Officers also need to understand, however, that the core behaviors that make them effective
on the job must not be used against family members and intimate partners (University of Florida).
The International Chiefs of Police (IACP) states that the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the victims, as well as abusers, experience same issues that are faced by civilians. Though
society looks to law enforcement to intervene in domestic violence situations, law enforcement
officers themselves may also be experiencing like situations at home. Law enforcement officers may
be abusers as well as victims of domestic violence. It is essential that they receive the same help as
civilians receive. It is not something to be ashamed of; it is a serious problem that needs special
attention. Abusers show similar signs and causes, as well as victims experience similar abusers and
abuse. What is the truth of officer–involved domestic violence?
Questions to consider in researching such a topic include: What can be classified as domestic
violence? How are civilian and officer– involved domestic violence similar and different? What are
warning sign of domestic violence? When should one report domestic violence? How can a law
enforcement officer be a victim? Why do victims remain in the abusive relationships? How does
officer–involved domestic violence impact the victim, the children, the agency, and the community?
Qualitative methods may include focus groups, in–depth interviews, and reviews of documents.
Primary inductive process is used to formulate theory or hypotheses. The qualitative method is more
subjective, it describes a problem or condition from the point of view of those experiencing it. It is

Direct Evidence Vs Circumstantial Evidence
The solving of a crime is highly dependent on the evidence gathered by the investigative team. The
crime scene will be the place where most (but not all) evidence will be located. This evidence can
range from tiny hair which are hardly visible to the naked eye to the more conspicuous pieces of
clothing left behind by the assailant. Whatever the case, this evidence often may often have a very
short life before it either gets destroyed or is contaminated. Hence it is imperative that it be gathered
with utmost care and sincerity so that the evidence can lead to the solution of the crime.
There are many ways of classifying the evidence. For e.g. Buckles (2007) differentiates between two
types of evidence: direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Testimonial evidence is often the most common and sometimes most controversial evidence as well.
This involves eyewitness reports about the crime. But it needs to be remembered that eyewitness
accounts are based on memories and these are often subject to distortions. Physical evidence is
objective evidence with specific physical dimensions such as size and shape. This includes
fingerprints, hair, blood stains, tyre marks, and other items. As is clear from the examples, that it
may be biological or non–biological in nature. Whatever, the nature of evidence, all evidence needs
to be collected in a scientific manner so that the evidence is uncontaminated. Documentary evidence
is in the form of written documents such as letters, notes, pictures that are found at the crime scene
or during the investigation. Demonstrative evidence demonstrates or "recreates" evidence that has
already been presented but needs further explanation. This may include sketches and photos of the
crime scene, diagrams

Circumstantial Evidence In Court Cases
While circumstantial evidence may be used to prove knowledge, the State did not meet its burden of
proof. When determining if a person had knowledge, a court will look at the following factors:
"incriminating statements made by the defendant, incriminating actions of the defendant upon the
police's discovery of drugs among or near the defendant's personal belongings, the defendant's
fingerprints on the packages containing the drugs, and any other circumstances linking the defendant
to the drugs." These factors were not present in Fischer and no other factors the majority used linked
Fischer to the drug, and thus established "knowingly" element beyond a reasonable doubt. As noted
in Justice Kern's dissent, the record lacks sufficient evidence ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The majority reasoned that Fischer's refusal to submit to a urinalysis is a factor that permits
inferences that Fischer knew about the drugs under the passenger's seat. However, as noted by the
dissent, "it is equally fair to presume he did not want to take the test because he had used marijuana
or simply wished to invoke his right not to submit to testing." The majority does not cite to any
statutory authority or case law to support their assertion that refusing to submit to a urinalysis is a
factor when considering the "knowingly" element under South Dakota Codified Law section 22–42–
5 Possession of a Controlled Substance. Refusing to submit to chemical testing is not circumstantial
evidence that links him to the tin to infer actual knowledge like circumstantial evidence of
fingerprints

Ignorance Is Happiness In Fahrenheit 451 And Pleasantville
The world we know, where we live, comprises a vast amount of knowledge. Knowledge refers to
awareness or familiarity, gained through learning, discoveries, or education. When you are born,
your brain is a blank sheet of paper. As you grow, your mind becomes aware of things and begins
filling the clear sheet of paper. The writing on the paper is precious; thus the knowledge is
invaluable. Everyone knows that knowledge is precious, but have you ever wondered: can
knowledge make people unhappy, confused or doubtful? Ignorance is bliss' plays a crucial character,
contemplating that question. Ignorance is bliss; a phrase that is well–clarified in the book Giver and
the following films: Fahrenheit 451 and Pleasantville.
'Ignorance is bliss' is well–elucidated in the book Giver due to the following statements. The book
Giver illustrates that everyone in the community is happy, except Jonas and the Giver. The reason
why Jonas and Giver are unhappy is that they are mindful of all the unpleasant memories that have
been passed on for years. An additional example– that supports the phrase 'Unawareness is
happiness,'– is, when Jonas's father goes for the releasing of a child, Jonas uncovers that releasing is
death. Before Jonas knew that releasing is death, he agreed on the idea of releasing, but as he
discovers that releasing means death, that instant he says "he killed him, my father killed him,"
representing a shock, and sadness. The statement, 'Ignorance is bliss' is true because

Should Innocent People Be Convicted With Only...
I think people should not be convicted with only circumstantial evidence. Most of the time people
that are convicted are convicted with circumstantial evidence are innocent. My three supporting
ideas are that circumstantial evidence is not enough it should be direct evidence, using
circumstantial evidence will most likely convict an innocent person, and it does not point to one
person or party.
If the evidence is not accurate an innocent person will be convicted of a crime they did not commit.
For example, in the Brain Banks article Brain was convicted of a crime that never happened, he was
convicted with only circumstantial evidence. After Brain Banks served his six years in prison
Wanetta Gibson confessed that Brain Banks never rapped her. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Another example would be The Crucible. In The Crucible Abigail was doing witchcraft and was
caught. Abigail and her friends were being accused of witchcraft and in order to save their own lives
Abigail and her friends lied and named many innocent people. The innocent people Abigail named
were hanged with only circumstantial evidence, because it was all they had. Innocent people can be
executed by using circumstantial instead of direct evidence. (Source: The Crucible, Pg,19–21)
In the TedTalk Francisco Carrillo was convicted of murder, but all they had was photo of Francisco
Carrillo. Many eyewitnesses identified Francisco as the shooter this took place late at night. The
judge decided to go where the murder took place to only find out that it was not possible to see the
shooter because of how dark it was no matter how close the car was the judge still could not see the
shooter. Francisco Carrillo was not convicted because the evidence they had was not enough to be
able to convict Francisco. (source: TedTalk Pg,

Dr. Harold Shipman Circumstantial Evidence
The British doctor, Dr. Harold "Dr. Death" Shipman was a silent killer. The law enforcement and
attorneys must have evidence to convict any person in a court of law. Some of the key factors in this
case appear to be circumstantial evidence and there was no forensic evidence presented. The first
factor is that Harold Shipman was admitted for psychiatric treatment and a drug conviction in 1976
and the General Medical Council was aware of this serious issue. Yet, they allowed him to continue
to practice without any documentation being filed, so they say, and no monitoring was implemented
for Harold. Dr. Shipman established a pattern in which all of the victims were injected with
morphine/heroin as a result of the coroner's reporting.
All the victims died in the afternoon and some died within an hour of a house call by Dr. Shipman,
which established another pattern set by Harold Shipman. Dr. Shipman proceeded further by forging
death certificates and orchestrated his colleagues approving forged cremation forms for the victims.
All victims were cremated, which destroyed the evidence for law enforcement to be able to recover
if needed. He was under the suspicion of murder but was never informed to stop practicing during
any investigations or allegations (Daily mail.com). The British law enforcement officials never
arrested Dr. Shipman ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The officials and the General Medical Council are just as guilty as Dr. Shipman because of their lack
of actions pertaining to the victims in this case. He was convicted of murdering fifteen elderly
women but not once was it mentioned that they searched his facility where he practiced, searched
his home, surveillance was ordered for his practice or home, searched his vehicle, or captured
syringes or any fingerprints from any syringes used to apply the injections to the

Prejudice In 12 Angry Men With Clouded Judgement
12 Angry Men with Clouded Judgement.
"An opinion is a judgment based on facts"– Fowler, H. Ramsey. The Little, Brown Handbook.
Prejudice can often be formed without one even realize they are prejudiced, many of the characters
in 12 Angry Men, have done as such, allowing their prejudice to not allow them fully evaluate the
case unbiasedly. Jurors three, ten and seven are swayed by their prejudiced beliefs against the
accused, as the deliberate the accused fate, juror ten states "his type are no good"(12 Angry Men).
This prejudice which all of them share, justifiers their neglecting to inspect the evidence and
testimony given rather than simply accepting it at face value. The film 12 Angry Men conveys how
difficult it can be to set aside prejudiced views through jurors three, seven, and ten. The film also
enables the reader to see how prejudice such as past experiences, ingnorance or misinformation, and
stereotyping can cloud ones judgement.
The film uses juror three to demonstrate how past experiences can influence ones prejudice in
decision making. Juror 3, who has a prejudice against the accused, and thinks the kid is under–
privileged and doesn't deserve a second chance, which is reason enough for him to conclude the
accused is guilty. As the discussion continues as to the verdict of the trial, juror three grows
frustrated and angrily refutes, "What is this? Love your under– privileged bother week or
something? (12 Angry Men). Due to his past experiences with young men, he is ready to sentence
the defendant to death with weak circumstantial evidence, grows angry as the other jurors question
what he refers to as "facts" and claims "You can't refute facts" (12 Angry Men) As all the Jurors
except juror twelve get more and more frustrated by the slowed process, juror three begins to see
through his prejudice, and disperses the other jurors interruptions by saying "Be quiet, we'll all get a
turn"(12 Angry Men). It finally becomes clear, he sees similarities with his son he had a falling out
with several years ago, and puts this prejudice aside and excepts that the evidence is too
circumstantial to convict a kid for murder, and sentence him to death.
Juror seven who has an ignorant and misinformed disapproval of

Who Is Iago Evil In Othello
It is not love that is blind, but jealousy. Many characters in William Shakespeare's Othello face the
"green–eyed monster" that is jealousy, but no one like the valiant Moor general himself, Othello.
Othello's trusted and honest ensign, Iago, instills the deep envy within Othello towards his once
favorite lieutenant, Cassio. Iago serves as the play's main antagonist as he expresses profound hatred
towards both Cassio and Othello, calling for their demise. He manipulates many situations and
words of others to make it appear to Othello that his lovely wife, Desdemona, is having an affair
with Cassio. Based solely on circumstantial evidence Iago provides, Othello is fueled with anger and
jealousy that completely deprives him of thoughtful judgement. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Iago is able to use these desirable traits he possesses as well as his strong friendship with
Desdemona to add fire to Othello's insecurities regarding their marriage. Iago has created this
destructive jealousy in Othello mainly toward Cassio as he was able to woo over his wife. Othello
strips Cassio of his position as lieutenant after one incident and plans on death to Cassio. Cassio
avoids speaking with Othello as he is embarrassed of the scene he caused, however, Cassio is
unaware as of Act III of the affair claims. When speaking with Desdemona, "*Enter Othello and
Iago*/...Madam, I'll take my leave.../*Cassio exits*" (III.iii.32). Cassio fleeing the scene when
Othello arrives makes him look very suspicious and allows for Iago to state Cassio is guilty,
explaining the questionable exit. Othello's interactions, or lack thereof, with Cassio display how
jealousy silently takes over his whole body, to the point where no communication exists between the

Johnny Griffin Case Study
On January 24, 2017 I observed the court case of William Satchell vs. Johnny Griffin. The name of
the case I observed was Butler in department 20 and the judge present was Michael G Bowman. I
arrived to 720 9th Street in Sacramento, CA at 1pm and stayed until 4pm. I observed a murder case
where I watched the defense attorney Johnny Griffin try and defend his client Mr. Butler. Mr. Butler
shot and killed Carl Talent an innocent man. Carl talent was shot and killed and the defense attorney
Johnny Griffin said the killing was a result of a heated argument. The defense attorney Johnny
Griffin said Mr. Butler shot and killed Carl Talent due to self–defense because he was scared for his
life. The defense attorney Johnny Griffin made clear to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mullen in department 3 at 720 9th street Sacramento, CA. I arrived at 8 and left at 10. I observed the
judge read the different type of hearing arraignments offered to the defendants. There are several
different types of hearing like arraignment hearing, pretrial hearing, preliminary hearings, jury trail,
court trail, sentence hearings and post sentence or probation violation hearings. During an
arraignment hearing the defendant first appears in court, advised of their constitutional rights,
appointed by an attorney if they are unable to afford one. The defendants are advised of the nature of
the charges bring bought against them. The judge gives the defendant three pleas to enter, guilty, not
guilty, or no contest plea. Some of the defendants were released on their own recognizance and the
judge set bail for some of the defendants. The cases I witnessed the judge set bail was for felony
crimes and defendants who had prior convictions. The defendants who were charged with a
misdemeanor and plead not guilty to the charges had to be brought to trail within thirty days of
being arraigned if they were in custody for forty five days, bail or their own recognizance. If the
defendants were charged with a felony and plead not guilty to the charges their preliminary hearing
must be held within ten days of being arraigned. Preliminary hearings determination is made if there
is sufficient evidence the

The Casey Anthony Case Essay
The Casey Anthony case was one that captured the heart of thousands and made it to the headline of
national TV talk shows, newspapers, radio stations and social media networks for months. The root
of the case was due to a clash between the parental responsibilities, the expectations that went with
being a parent, and the life that Casey Anthony wanted to have. The case was in respect to the
discovering the cause of Casey's two–year–old daughter, Caylee Marie Anthony's, death; however
the emphasis was placed on Casey and her futile lies, which resulted in a public outcry. The purpose
of this essay is to delve into the public atmosphere and inquire about why the media and social
media collectively attacked the case by uncovering the content ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Casey told detectives several lies, including that her nanny had kidnapped Caylee on June 9, and
that she had been trying to find her, too frightened to alert the authorities. She was charged with
first–degree murder in October 2008 and pleaded not guilty. The prosecution sought the death
penalty and alleged Casey murdered her daughter to be free from parental responsibilities by
administering chloroform and applying duct tape. The defense team countered that the child had
drowned accidentally in the family's swimming pool on June 16, 2008, and that George Anthony
disposed of the body. The defense contended that Casey lied about these issues due to a
dysfunctional upbringing, which was said to include sexual abuse by her father. On June 5, 2011, the
jury found Casey not guilty of first–degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated
manslaughter of a child, but guilty of four misdemeanor counts of providing false information to a
law enforcement officer. She was released on a bond of $500,000 and a Florida court overturned two
of the misdemeanor convictions on January 25, 2013. The "performers" of the trial played a crucial
role in the trial, the verdict and the informal perceptions of Casey Anthony. The prosecutor and
defense both played contrasting roles in shaping their client/opponent legally and informally, in the
media. The

Paranormal Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jenny Richardson

More from Jenny Richardson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Paranormal Research Paper