Due to speedy industrialization and urbanization in the united states lot of infrastructure trends are taking place. This technique has in flip led questions to mankind to remedy the troubles generated through this growth. The troubles described are acute scarcity of constructional materials, improved productiveness of waste and other products. In this task M30 grade concrete is taken and waste plastic is used as modifier. Tests had been carried out on coarse aggregates, high quality aggregates, cement and modifiers plastic waste to decide their bodily properties. Trail mixes are organized with 5 , 10 and 15 of plastic aggregates as the substitute for sand in M30 grade of concrete. Based on the mechanical power of concrete, it is found that 5 substitute of sand with plastic aggregates is the superior content. A. Saravanan | D. Kanagaraj "Experimental Study on Plastic Vastum as a Coarse Aggregate Quia Structural Concrete" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30624.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/structural-engineering/30624/experimental-study-on-plastic-vastum-as-a-coarse-aggregate-quia-structural-concrete/a-saravanan
2. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30624 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 668
1.2. PRELIMINARY TEST
The particular gravity and sieve evaluation take a look at is
performed for each traditional and modifier materials.
Specific gravity check for cement is additionally carried out
in this study.
1.3. CASTING OF SPECIMENS
Casting of cube, cylinder and prism isperformedforeachthe
traditional and modifier specimens.
Table 1.1 Total number of specimens
Serial
No.
Specimens Conventional Modifier
5% 10% 15%
1 Cube 6 6 6 6
2 Cylinder 6 6 6 6
3 Prism 6 6 6 6
2. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Table 2.1 Specific gravity of cement
Trial No. 1 2
Volume of flask at 20°C 50 50
Temperature during Test (t °C) 27.5 27.5
Method of air removal Vacuum Vacuum
Weight of bottle W1 (g) 42.4 42.3
Weight of bottle + Cement W2 (g) 52.11 52.13
Weight of bottle + Cement +
Kerosene W3(g)
87.05 87.08
Weight of bottle + Kerosene W4 (g) 80.07 80.1
Specific Gravity Gce at t °C 3.56 3.45
Mean Value of Gce 3.15
2.1. PLASTIC WASTE
The plastic waste is beaten into portions and then melted at
positive boiling point. This molten plastic is fashioned into
threads and then the use of mold cutter it is reduce into
required size.
3. MIX DESIGN
The concrete used in this find out about was once
proportioned to acquire electricity of 30 MPa. The exclusive
kind of mixes are acquired throughincludingplasticwasteto
5%, 10% and 15% first-rate mixtureratio.Thecombineshall
be designed to produce M30 grade of concrete. The graph is
achieved as per IS 10262.
Table 3.1 Mix Properties
Water Cement
Fine Coarse
Units
aggregate aggregate
208 462 640.409 1065.68 m3
0.45 1 1.38 2.30
3.1. PREPARATION OF TESTING SPECIMENS
For the quite a number combine percentage of plastic waste
the concrete cubes, cylinder and prism have been organized
for 7days and 28days. The dice specimen had been used for
compressive energy whereas cylinder specimens have been
used for break up tensile power and prism specimens had
been used for flexural strength.
Figure 3.1 Specimens with concrete
Figure 3.2 Beam Specimen with concrete
TESTING OF HARDENED CONCRETE
Concrete specimens of cube, cylinder, prism is casted for
traditional and modifier combine in a variety of percentages
of by way of the weight of the sand and with the top-quality
proportion concrete specimens of cylinder, beam and slabis
casted. Thus specimens have been subjected to loading. And
the water absorption take a look at additionally conducted.
The quite a number take a look at are listed in desk below.
Table 3.1 Various tests conducted in this study
Serial
No.
Properties
studied
Specimen
Specimen
size(mm)
1
Compressive
strength
Cube 150 x 150 x 150
2
Split tensile
strength
Cylinder 150 x 300
3
Flexural
strength
Prism 100x 100 x 500
4
Young’s
Modulus
Cylinder 150 x 300
5 RCPT Cylinder 100 x 150
6
Flexural
Strength
Beam 1500 x 150 x 180
7
Impact
Strength
Slab 1000 x 1000 x 25
4. RESULTS
4.1. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
MIX ID
COMPRESSIVE STRNGTH N/mm2
3days 7 days 14 days 28 days
PT1 2.16 3.60 6.00 10
PT2 2.88 4.88 8.00 13.33
PT3 3.31 5.52 9.20 15.33
PT4 3.55 5.92 9.87 16.45
PT5 3.65 6.09 10.16 16.93
PT6 4.32 7.20 12.00 20
PT7 5.72 9.53 15.89 26.48
PT8 6.22 10.37 17.29 28.51
PT10 8.16 13.60 22.68 37.80
PT11 9.54 15.91 26.52 44.20
PT12 10.75 17.92 29.88 49.80
PT13 10.32 17.20 28.67 47.78
PT14 9.52 15.87 26.45 44.08
PT15 8.75 14.58 24.31 40.51
Table 4.1 Compressive strength comparison
Figure4.1 Cube Compressive strength at 7, 14&28 days
3. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30624 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 669
4.2. SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH
MIX ID
TENSILE STRNGTH N/mm2
7 days 14 days 28 days
P0 2.00 2.30 2.70
P5 2.60 2.70 3.43
P10 2.56 2.60 2.85
P15 2.08 2.58 2.45
P20 2.05 2.50 2.39
Table 4.2 Spilt Tensile strength comparison
Figure.4.2 Split tensile strengthat 7, 14 & 28 days
4.3. FLEXURAL STRENGTH
MIX ID
FLEXURAL STRNGTH N/mm2
7 days 14 days 28 days
P0 1.00 1.20 1.26
P5 1.20 1.26 1.30
P10 1.23 1.29 1.46
P15 1.38 1.40 1.50
P20 1.30 1.38 1.47
Table 4.3 Flexural strength comparison
Figure.4.3 Flexural strength at 7, 14 & 28 days
4.4. YOUNG’S MODULUS TEST (CONVENTIONAL)
Figure.4.4 Young’s Modulus Test (conventional)
4.5. FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF BEAM (MODIFIER)
Figure 4.5 Flexural strength of beam (conventional)
4.6. IMPACT STRENGTH OF SLAB
Figure.4.6 Energy absorption of RCC slab
5. CONCLUSIONS
From the experimental learn about on concrete with plastic
aggregates, the following observations are made,
1. The compressive strengths of modified (plastic added)
cement concrete nearly equals the compressive
electricity of undeniable cement concrete.
2. The most useful modifiercontentmaterial isdetermined
to be 5% by way of weight of sand for the exceptional
aggregate.
3. The addition of plastic aggregates have now not
produced any sizable exchange in the Compressive
strength, Split tensile Strength and Flexural strength.
4. Therefore the 5% of the herbal first-class combination
can be changed to put together the concrete.
5. The permeability of modified concrete used to be
observed to be very low.
6. Plastic waste can be efficaciously used in the concrete
and for that reason furnish a answer for the disposal
trouble of the plastic wastes.
REFERENCES
[1] Adewumi John Babafemi, BrankoSavija, Suvash
Chandra Paul, Vivi Anggraini, 2018, ‘Engineering
Properties of Concrete with Waste Recycled Plastic’,
International Journal of Emerging Technology and
Advanced Engineering, vol.2, pp.42-46.
[2] Anju Ramesan,Shemy S, Babu, Aswathy Lal, 2015,
‘Experimental Investigation on the Performanceof
Plastic Aggregate Concrete’, International Journal for
Research inAppliedScience &EngineeringTechnology,
vol.3, pp.303-312.
[3] Anju Ramesan, Shemy S. Babu, Aswathy Lal, 2015,
‘Performance of Light-Weight Concrete with Plastic
4. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30624 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 670
Aggregate’, International Journal Of Structural And
Civil Engineering, vol.3, pp.169-174.
[4] Anumol S, Elson John, 2015, ‘Study onthePerformance
of Plastics as Replacement for Aggregates’,
International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology, vol.4, pp.187-190.
[5] Balaji KVGD, Santosh Kumar, Kondra Nikhil Gupta,
2019, ‘Adoption of Recycled HDPE PlasticGranulesand
waste Crushed Glass as a Partial SubstituteoffineSand
in Concrete’, International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology, vol.8, pp.536-542.
[6] Chien-Chung Chen, Nathan Jaffe, Matt Koppitz, Wesley
Weimer, Albert Polocoser, 2015, ‘Concrete Mixture
With Plastic As Fine Aggregate Replacement’,
International Journal For Research Science &
Technology, vol.5, pp.26-34.
[7] Daniel Yaw Osei, 2014, ‘Experimental Investigation on
Recycled Plastics as Aggregate in Concrete’,
International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and
Civil Engineering, vol.2, pp.49-53.
[8] LogachandranD, Kalaivani M, 2018, ‘Feasibility Study
on Plastic Wastes in Concrete’, International Journal of
Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and
Technology, vol.2, pp.687-690.
[9] M. MuzafarAhmed, Dr. S. Siddi Raju, 2013, ‘Properties
of Concrete by the Addition of Plastic Solid Waste’,
Journal Of Materials And Engineering Structures,vol.5,
pp.24-31.
[10] MB Hossain, P Bhowmik, KM Shaad, 2016, ‘Use of
waste plastic aggregation in concrete as a constituent
material’, Performance of Light-Weight Concrete with
Plastic Aggregate, vol.5, pp.105-110.
[11] Ms. K. Ramadevi, Ms. R. Manju, 2012, ‘Experimental
Investigation on the Properties of Concrete With
Plastic PET (Bottle) Fibres as Fine Aggregates’,
International Journal of Civil and Structural
Engineering Research, vol.5, pp.47-52.
[12] Parvesh Kumar, Gaurav Kumar, 2015, ‘Effect of
Recycled Plastic AggregatesonConcrete’,International
Journal of Science and Research, vol.5, pp.912-915.
[13] Praveen Mathew,Shibi Varghese, Thomas Paul, Eldho
Varghese, 2013, ‘Recycled Plastics asCoarseAggregate
for Structural Concrete’, International Journal of
Science and Research, vol.4, pp.1170-1173.
[14] Suhad M Abd, Fahad Mohammad,HumamAbdul-sattar
and MaisMalallah, 2016, ‘Producing Green Concrete
Using Waste Plastic, One step of societies’,
Sustainability, vol.10, pp.1-26.
[15] ZasiahTafheem, Rakibul Islam Rakib, M.D.
Esharuhullah, S. M. ReduanulAlam, Md. Mashfiqul
Islam, 2018, ‘Experimental investigation on the
properties of concrete containing post-consumer
plastic waste as coarse aggregate replacement’,
Progressive Agriculture, vol.3, pp.383-391.