2. Prioritization Process
When Purpose/Actions
Meeting 1 (2/29) • Getting Started
• Agreements For Moving Forward
Between Meetings Initial Survey
(e-input) • Review/Provide Input on Proposed Criteria
• Identify State Roles for Strategies
Meeting 2 (3/19) • Review/Finalize Criteria
9:30am -12:30pm
Meeting 3 (4/2) • Clarify Strategies
9:30am-12:30pm • Clarify State Roles
Between Meetings Prioritization Survey
(e-input) • Rate Strategies Using Final Criteria
• Refine Concise Statement
Meeting 4 (4/25) • Vote on Concise Statement
1:30pm – 4:30pm • Share Results of Prioritization
• Gather Additional Input for Ex Committee
3. Agenda Review
Welcome and Overview
Vote on Concise Statement
Sharing Results of Prioritization Survey
Reflecting on Where We’ve Been and Clarifying
What’s Ahead
Gathering Comments
Closure and Thank You
4. Decision Making Process
Discussion: All encouraged to participate
Decisions: For Today & Prioritization Survey
60% super majority vote, motioned by a Steering
Committee Member
One vote per Steering Committee Member
Ex Committee, and other observers, do not vote
5. Steering Committee Voting
Members
Sector Team Leads or Designee (8 reps from PSD)
Healthy Eating (2 reps from PSD)
Physical Activity (2 reps from PSD)
LHAs (5 total: 1 rep each from El Paso, Weld, Boulder,
Pueblo, West-Central Partnership)
External Organizations (3 total: 1 rep each from Live
Well, Kaiser, Health Foundation)
6. Voting on Concise Statement
Purpose: To build support for the issues with an organization,
policy maker or a funding agency.
Describes the mission, internal strengths and weaknesses,
external opportunities and threats, and vision.
Describes gaps between current status and desired goals.
Included:
Health condition or risk factor considered
Population affected
Size and scope of problem
Prevention opportunities
Potential stakeholders
8. Top 5 Criteria
1. Likelihood of Population Impact (new definition
includes reach)
2. Capacity to Implement
3. Impact of Health Disparities
4. Ability to Measure
5. Political/Community Support
9. Reporting of Priorities
1. Strategies Across Sectors (ranked from highest to
lowest priority regardless of sector)
Strategy Sector Evidence Population Capacity Impact Ability to Support Total Potential
Level Impact on HD Measure Score CDPHE
(adjusted) Roles
2. Strategies Within Sectors (ranked from highest to
lowest priority within each sector)
Sector A
Strategy Evidence Population Capacity Impact Ability to Support Total Potential
Level Impact on HD Measure Score CDPHE
(adjusted) Roles
Sector B
Strategy Evidence Population Capacity Impact Ability to Support Total Potential
Level Impact on HD Measure Score CDPHE
(adjusted) Roles
11. PSD Obesity Project Charter:
Key Activities Accomplished
1. Community assessment
2. Data presentation quantifying the issue
3. Sector teams searched literature (“boot camp”)
4. Steering Committee approved concise statement (in this
meeting)
5. Sector teams rated literature
6. Sector teams submitted literature libraries and ratings to
Steering Committee
7. Steering Committee prioritized strategies
12. PSD Obesity Project Charter:
Next Key Activities
8. Executive Committee reviews and approves prioritized
strategies
9. Executive Committee and Steering Committee refer highly
rated and prioritized strategies to sector teams.
o Sector teams form implementation teams for selected strategies
o Invite stakeholders to participant on teams
o Similar to the MCH process
o Implementation teams consider:
Applicability to Colorado
Resources needed
Consultation with sector teams and/or partners
Future evidence
14. Gathering Comments
Three ways
Individually
Small Group
Large Group
What recommendations do you have for the
Executive Committee and/or Implementation
Teams moving forward?
15. Gathering Comments (part 1)
What recommendations do you have for the
Executive Committee and/or Implementation
Teams moving forward?
Individually – Write down your thoughts (5 min)
16. Gathering Comments (part 1)
What recommendations do you have for the
Executive Committee and/or Implementation
Teams moving forward?
When the chime rings, we’ll form groups of 4-5
people by counting off 1-4
Discuss and chart your comments for the Executive
Committee and/or Implementation Teams (20 min)
Assign a spokesperson
You will share these with the larger group
17. Gathering Comments (part 2)
What recommendations do you have for the
Executive Committee and/or Implementation
Teams moving forward?
What key themes do you see emerging from
the small group recommendations?
18. Gathering Comments (part 2)
What recommendations do you have for the
Executive Committee and/or Implementation
Teams moving forward?
What else is on your mind?
19. Closure and Thank You
Reminder
Hopes from Meeting #1
Evaluation to follow
Thank you
Editor's Notes
Reminder of where we are in the process
Review agenda (tight agenda, will keep us moving)Other handoutsnorms
These became our top five criteria.Remember, we selected criteria that we felt would be helpful in prioritizing strategies that CDPHE should put time and resources behind.You have a handout that shows the definition, the rating scale we’ll use, and some considerations to think about when applying the criteria. For now, just know it is there and we’ll have an opportunity to look at it together toward the end of the meeting today.
We thought it might be helpful, as we move into the strategy discussion, for you to know what the Executive Committee will receive, once we have the prioritized list.2 lists:One will show all of the strategies ordered by their total priority score (remember, there may be ties), across all sectors.The other will show the ranking of specific strategies within each sector.Why both?Ultimately, it is up to the Executive Committee to decide which sectors we work on, and which strategies we implement.We don’t want to assume that just because all of the strategies in one sector were ranked lower than all of the strategies in another sector, that we would simply not work on the lower ranked sector. We feel that providing the information in two formats will allow the Executive Committee to see the information from a couple different perspectives.
Karen cover both slides on charter?All of this information is on CoPrevent?** in various forms to make it more user-friendly and to provide as much detail as needed
