Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement
Advertisement

Web 2.0

  1. Web .0 Web: Spinning a New Thread Ismail Fayed ismailfayed@yahoo.com Sunday, 11 February 2007, 01:00:pm
  2. Overview • PLLE.. new trends and potentials • Web 2.0 technologies • Web 2.0 for educators • A gateway for learner’s autonomy and folksonomy.. 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 2
  3. The Internet Now and Before.. The only thing that I learned recently is 5 Yrs ago just a resource for using the open source systems on the teaching only, but now it’s internet which opened a lot of horizons related to everything around for interacting and communicating me. It’s part of my daily life. knowledge and software with people Khawla Tarish (2007) around the world. Rana Kais (2007) 5 years ago the internet to me was for information, music and emails. Today I use it for shopping, doing research, studying, shopping, getting movies, communicating, watching movies, playing chess, letters, ....... almost every thing. I now travel with a laptop. Murray Grant (2007) 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 3
  4. What’s Web 2.0? On Sep. 2005, Tim O’Reilly wrote apiece summarizing the subject. The min-map pictured here (constructed by Markus Angermeier on Nov. 11, 2005) sums up the memes of Web 2.0, with example-sites and services attached. 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 4
  5. What’s Web 2.0? 3 Minutes Flexbeta, (2006) “What is Web 2.0?” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 5
  6. Examples • R/A: Rich Turn-up Appications turning the data from the desktop to the browser (flash, Ajax) • SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture (Feeds, RSS, Web-services, Mash-ups) • The Social Web: by the help of the end-user. user The user is more of a participant.. (tagging – wiki – blogging – podcasting) 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 6
  7. Web 2.0 for Educators • Collaborative, social, and personal.. The Social Web provides: A folksonomy is an Internet-based information retrieval methodology consisting of collaboratively generated, open- ended labels that categorize content such as Web pages, • Feedback online photographs, and Web links. • Interaction A folksonomy is most notably contrasted from a taxonomy in • “data” that the authors of the labeling system are often the main users (and sometimes originators) of the content to which the labels are applied. The labels are commonly known as tags and the labeling process is called tagging… In contrast to professionally developed taxonomies with controlled vocabularies, folksonomies are unsystematic and, from an information scientist's point of view, undependable and inconsistent; however, for Internet users, they dramatically lower content categorization costs because there is no hierarchically organized nomenclature to learn. One simply makes tags up on the fly 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 7
  8. What’s Web 2.0? 2/11/2007 Web 2.0Ismail Fayed visual summary, by O’Reilly (2006) 8
  9. What’s Web 2.0? 2 Minutes Web 2.0 Ad! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 9
  10. Internet Evolution Today's Internet looks quite different from what many investors pictured just five years ago. Thomas Baker (1999) Web 1.0 Web 2.0 DoubleClick --> Google AdSense Ofoto --> Flickr Akamai --> BitTorrent mp3.com --> Napster Britannica Online --> Wikipedia personal websites --> blogging evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB domain name speculation --> search engine optimization page views --> cost per click screen scraping --> web services publishing --> participation content management systems --> wikis directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy") stickiness --> Syndication 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 10
  11. Features of the .0.. Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Examples of services available Static Dynamic Push Push/ Pull Text blogs, wikis, dictionaries, Read Only Read/ Write Voice messaging boards, chat, voice/ sound Client/ Server Peer-to-Peer SMS Video messages, flash videos, Taxonomy Folksonomy video online TV, iPods Consumerism Participation Google.com, kartoo.com, Walled garden Open territory search pagebull.com Teacher-administered Learner directed Community groups, forums, projects, wikis Highly structured Loosely structured building Institutional personal Institutional learner Free range learner Limited Few limited 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 11
  12. What is Web 2.0? 3 Minutes Web 2.0 Insights http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 12
  13. What’s Web 2.0? 5 Minutes Jutecht, (2006) “Web 2.0” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 13
  14. What’s Web 2.0? 5 Minutes ariosamba, (2006) “What Are Mash-ups” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 14
  15. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators oice g:V kin ards Spea Bo Vaestro.com©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 15
  16. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators oice :V ing rds eak oa Sp B Tackpack.com ©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 16
  17. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators g nin Liste BBC.co.uk ©, an example of News Live radio and TV 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 17
  18. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators Onlin e Co u r Comm ses and unitie s Elearning 4 kids ©, an example of News Live radio and TV 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 18
  19. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators Reading Writing Research Discussions Blogspot.com ©, an example of a class blog 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 19
  20. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators Se a rch topi for n cs o ew r the mes Page bull.com ©, an example of a live dynamic search engine 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 20
  21. Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators 7 Minutes Stanley’s “Web 2.0 for Language Learners” Video http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579 &q=Web+2.0+for+teachers 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 21
  22. References • Ariosamba, (2006). “What Are Mash-ups” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Baker, T. (1999). “TIAC White Paper on: Appropriate Technology for Digital Libraries” Available from: <http://www.tiac.or.th/tiacweb/Baker/Title.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Campell, A. Rip, Mix, and Burn: creating Personal Language Learning Environments to enhance EFL classes. Available from: <http://e-poche.net/?page_id=69> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. •D’Souza, Q. (2006). “Web 2.0 Ideas for Educators: A Guide to Rss and More” Available from: <http://www.teachinghacks.com/audio/100ideasWeb2educators.pdf> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Flexbeta, (2006). “What is Web 2.0?” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Good, R. (2006). “Web 2.0 Remixed” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Graham (2006). “Web 2.0 & Language Learning” Available from: <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579&q=Web+2.0+for+teachers> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Jukes, I. (2006). “Web 2.0 Tools for Educators” Available from: <http://21cif.imsa.edu/resources/links/v1n5_Web2.0_links.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Jutecht, (2006). “Web 2.0” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Kitched, D. & Tobler W. (2006). “Hak.5 Microshaft Web 2.0 Framework” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • MacManus, R. (2005). “What’s Web 2.0” Available from: <http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=5> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • O’Reilly, T. (2005). “Not 2.0?”. Available from: <http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • O’Reilly, T. (2005). “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”. Available from: <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Wikipedia’s definition of “Web 2.0”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. • Wikiperdia’s definition of “Folksonomy”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 22
  23. 2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 23
Advertisement