2. Summative evaluation
is the process of
collecting data and
information in order to
make decisions about
the acquisition or
continued use of some
instruction.
3. Describe the purpose of summative
evaluation
Describe the two phases of summative
evaluation and the decisions resulting
from each phase
4. Design a summative evaluation for
comparing alternative sets of candidate
instructional materials
Contrast formative and summative
evaluation by purpose and design
7. The purpose of the expert judgment
phase is to determine whether currently
used instruction or other candidate
instruction has the potential for meeting
an organization’s defined instructional
needs
8. Evaluating the congruence between the
organization’s instructional needs and
candidate instruction
Evaluating the completeness and accuracy of
candidate instruction
Evaluating the instructional strategy contained
in the candidate instruction
9. Evaluating the utility of the instruction
Determining current users’ satisfaction with
the instruction
10.
11. First Component is
outcomes analysis, which
involves determining the
effect of instruction on
learners’ skills, on the job
(transfer), and on the
organization (need
resolution).
Second Component is
called management
analysis, which includes
assessing instructor and
supervisor attitudes
related to learner
performance,
implementation feasibility,
and costs
12. Expert Judgment Phase of Summative
Evaluation
Congruence Analysis To perform the
congruence analysis, you
should first obtain a clear
description of the
organization’s needs,
which includes an accurate
description of the entry
skills and characteristics of
the target learners.
13. Analyze the congruence between the resources the
organization has available for purchasing and
implementing instructional materials and the costs of
obtaining and installing candidate materials.
Compare the organization’s needs versus needs
addressed in the materials
Compare the organization’s target groups versus target
groups for the materials
Compare the organization’s resources versus
requirements for obtaining and implementing the
instruction
14.
15. The final planning activity is to develop orientation and
perhaps training for the instructors.A good summative
evaluation will require the cooperation of those who are
implementing the instruction.
17. Summative evaluations are conducted to make decisions
about whether to maintain or adopt instruction.The
primary evaluator in a summative evaluation is rarely the
designer or developer of the instruction; the evaluator is
frequently unfamiliar with the materials, the organization
requesting the evaluation, or the set-ting in which the
materials are evaluated. Such evaluators are referred to as
external evaluators; these evaluators are preferred for
summative evaluations because they have no personal
investment in the instruction and are likely to be more
objective about the strengths and weaknesses of the
instruction
18. The design of the expert judgment phase of summative
evaluation is anchored in the model for systematically
designing instruction.
